Google Doodle honors peppermeister Wilbur Scoville

January 22, 2016 • 8:45 am

Today’s Google Doodle, an animation (access it by clicking on the screenshot blow), honors the 151st birthday of Wilbur Scoville (1865-1942), an American chemist. In 1912, Scoville devised the “Scoville Organoleptic Test,” a way to quantify the spiciness of chile peppers. Now, of course, breeders all over the world compete to grow the spiciest chiles with the highest Scoville rating.

Screen Shot 2016-01-22 at 6.46.20 AM

Here’s a video of the animation; Google’s story about the making of the Doodle is here.

In 2013 the New Yorker had a nice article, “Fire-Eaters” (free online) about breeders’ informal competition to grow the hottest chile. It ends with the teaser that Butch Taylor, a Louisiana plumber who breeds chiles as a hobby, was producing a really wicked one:

Before we came inside, Taylor had shown me his greenhouse, where he tends his most precious plants. A single bush dominated the small hut. Hanging from its branches were an assortment of pods, some of them deep red and some of them a faint green. The plant, which was not yet stable, was the third generation of an accidental cross of a 7-Pot Jonah and, most likely, a Trinidad Scorpion Butch T. Taylor was calling it the WAL—the Wicked-Ass Little 7-Pot. He shook a branch, unleashing a swarm of flies, and picked a pod from the stem. “Just off the top of my head, the first one I tasted, I’d say two million Scovilles,” he said. “But it may just be a freak of nature. You get those now and then.”

Below is Wikipedia’s diagram of the Scoville scale, with the Carolina Reaper still holding out over the Trinidad Scorpion Butch T pepper. Here’s how the ratings are achieved, a combination of objective methodology and subjective assessment (unavoidable when it comes to matters of taste perception):

In Scoville’s method, an exact weight of dried pepper is dissolved in alcohol to extract the heat components (capsinoids), then diluted in a solution of sugar water. Decreasing concentrations of the extracted capsinoids are given to a panel of five trained tasters, until a majority (at least three) can no longer detect the heat in a dilution. The heat level is based on this dilution, rated in multiples of 100 SHU.

A weakness of the Scoville Organoleptic Test is its imprecision due to human subjectivity, depending on the taster’s palate and their number of mouth heat receptors, which varies greatly among people. Another weakness is sensory fatigue the palate is quickly desensitised to capsaicins after tasting a few samples within a short time period. Results vary widely, ± 50%, between laboratories.

Notice that jalapeño peppers, which most people consider hot, come in at a wimpy 1000-4000 Scoville units.

Screen Shot 2016-01-22 at 7.28.52 AM

The active ingredient in chiles—the stuff that makes them hot—is the compound capsaicin, although other related compounds (“capsaicinoids”) contribute to the heat as well. Below is the diagram of a capsaicin molecule; it and its relatives probably evolved as protective compound in wild chiles, deterring attacks by herbivores and fungi. Humans have taken advantage of that protection by simply breeding for more and more of the hot metabolites.

Apparently birds, who disperse wild pepper seeds, don’t react to capsaicinoids, while mammalian herbivores, who would crunch the seeds and destroy the plant’s ability to pass on its genes, react adversely. This is probably not a case of true coevolution; I suspect that plants producing fleshy bits containing capsacinoids (seeds don’t themselves contain the compounds) left more genes than those that didn’t simply because birds already lacked the receptors for the compounds while mammals had them.

665px-Kapsaicyna.svg
Capsaicin

There is in fact, a Wikipedia article about Guinness’s Official World’s Hottest Pepper, the Carolina Reaper, also known as HP22B, bred in South Carolina and coming in at a scorching 1,569,300 Scoville units.  (One was rated at 2.2 million Scoville Units.) Here’s what they look like:

Carolina_Reaper_pepper_pods

You can buy seeds and Reaper Hot Sauce from the PuckerButt Pepper Company (sauce here; hottest seeds here). I dare any reader to try one of these (warning: do not ingest “Reaper Venum” directly):

reaper_squeezins_black1_1024x1024

Reaper_Venum_1024x1024

If you want something hotter, there are pure capsicum extracts, hotter than the hottest pepper available, here, as well as a panoply of hot sauces having various degrees of tongue-destruction.

Oh, and here’s Scoville himself, a man who had no idea what monster he’d created:

Screen Shot 2016-01-22 at 8.00.52 AM

 

 

Readers’ wildlife encounters

January 22, 2016 • 7:30 am

Instead of posting Readers’ Wildlife Photos today, I have a YouTube video about a cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus), and one reader’s experience with those birds.

First, reader Diane G. called my attention to a Guardian column from last year by Grrlscientist about cockatiels, “This talented parrot thinks he’s a songbird.” After giving some information about the species, Grrlscientist gets onto the really good stuff—its famous vocal mimicry:

Male cockatiels (but not females) can learn to whistle a variety of songs — which I think of as being their true talent — and can also learn to mimic the human voice. An interesting — and very unusual for parrots — trait of cockatiels is that their ability to learn new sounds is limited by age. Most parrots learn to produce new sounds throughout their lives — a character known as “open ended learning” in songbirds. But in my experience, cockatiels’ song learning abilities diminish rapidly after they’ve passed their first birthday. In songbirds, this trait is known as “closed ended learning”.

The cockatiel in the above video is truly remarkable because the song he is whistling is quite complex and long, yet he produces it effortlessly. Someone invested a lot of effort into training that little parrot to whistle that song! And as if that isn’t remarkable enough, he also whistles his song whilst being accompanied on piano!

I think that the delightful musical piece that the cockatiel is whistling is the theme from the Japanese fantasy film, “My Neighbor Totoro”, but I am certain you’ll correct me if I’m wrong. [Readers can weigh in here.]

And here’s the vido, apparently from Russia, which I find quite remarkable:

When I remarked on that amazing performance, Diane G. added her own experience owning these birds, which includes a cool tale:

Per Grrl, “Someone invested a lot of effort into training that little parrot to whistle that song! And as if that isn’t remarkable enough, he also whistles his song whilst being accompanied on piano!”
My male ‘tiels would pick up lots of sounds automatically, like the sound of the back-door opening which would freak me out when they’d imitate it while I was all alone in the house. . . And they’d learn whistles quite easily, though longer ones took more effort. I remember once when my husband, who gets up at the crack of dawn, let the dogs out, only to have one of them get skunked pretty badly. . . so of course, he comes and wakes me up. The last thing I wanted to hop out of bed and do was wash a stinky dog, so I thought I’d just confine it to the mudroom until I wanted to get up “officially.”  Theodore, the cockatiel whose cage was also in the mudroom, didn’t think very highly of that idea, and he started whistling reveille* over and over at the top of his lungs, which in that case I think meant ‘get this *expletive* smelly dog outta here!!’  Suffice it to say I ended up not returning to bed…

*Note: “Reveille is the wake-up called played by bugles to American soldiers in the morning. It’s jarring, and you can hear it here.

If you’ve had a cockatiel (and I know some of you have), weigh in below. Musicians are also welcome to assess the bird’s performance.

 

Superfluous quotation marks

January 22, 2016 • 7:00 am

One of my first experiences with superfluous quotation marks was as a young assistant professor at the University of Maryland. There was to be a post-seminar social, and the chairman sent around a notice announcing that “coffee” and “cookies” would be served. Were these faux comestibles, I wondered? Now I encounter superfluous quotation marks all the time, and of course there’s a website for these things: The “Blog” of “Unnecessary” Quotation Marks. It’s a hoot.

Here’s my addition: the email I received from the company to which the Indian embassy outsources its visa program (a screenshot from my phone):

IMG_0936

I wonder what “received” means when it’s in quotes! Are they pulling my leg?

Friday: Hili dialogue (and Leon lagniappe)

January 22, 2016 • 6:00 am

PCC(E) is very tired this morning, still suffering from some chronic insomnia. Well, I do my best. On this day in 1905, Bloody Sunday in St. Petersburg kicked off the revolution of 1905, eventually leading to the Big Revolution—the one from which my grandfather fled to found the maternal side of the American Coyne Dynasty. In 1973, the Roe v. Wade decision was handed down by the Supreme Court, legalizing abortion, a decision that every Republican in the U.S. is now trying to gut. Lord Byron was born on this day in 1824 (I’ve seen his name that he engraved as graffiti on the Temple of Poseidon at Sounion, Greece); Sam Cooke was born in 1931; and Linda “Exorcist” Blair in 1959. On this day in 1666, the great Mughal emperor Shah Jahan died; he built the the greatest monument to love ever—the Taj Mahal (one of the three most beautiful things on Earth I’ve ever seen). Lyndon Johnson died of a heart attack on this day in 1973, and Heath Ledger in 2008 (was it that long ago)? Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili has taken a walk in the deep snow with her staff—a rare event that’s documented below. She looks like a mini Siberian tiger.

A: So you decided to enjoy winter after all.
Hili: Yes, but if we are having such Arctic weather now, where are the white mice?

P1030814 (1)
In Polish:
Ja: A jednak postanowiłaś cieszyć się zimą.
Hili: Tak, ale jak już mamy taką arktyczną pogodę, to gdzie są te białe myszki?

Meanwhile, Leon is off in the mountains with his staff, ready to hike in the snow. He is, however, a bit disgruntled with the heating arrangements in their vacation cabin. I’m eager to see if he’ll again meet his inamorata, the lovely Balbina, who lives in a lodge higher up.

Leon: You can’t lie down on this heater!

12573044_1085118181508782_3049407370116394946_n

Squirrel Appreciation Day

January 21, 2016 • 3:15 pm

I should have asked readers to furnish pictures that they took of squirrels (perhaps offering a prize), but it’s too late. Fortunately, two readers sent in photos, and I have one of my own. Remember that it’s officially Squirrel Appreciation Day, and if you have photos on hand, send them to me and I’ll add them to this thread.

Here’s one of mine, fed on the windowsill. He’s eaten all his sunflower seeds and is asking for more.

IMG_0923

From reader Chris B.

In honor of squirrel appreciation day.  This is from a few weeks ago when we had not gotten much snow yet here in upstate NY.  The flagpole arrangement for the feeder was not specifically intended to exclude squirrels but you can see it takes some effort for them to get to it.  Have seen a few squirrels there, including this frazzle-tailed guy:

IMG_4269

IMG_4261

And from reader Randy Schenck:

Since this is Squirrel Day, let’s have some photos taken on this day.  The Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger).
21 Jan. 2016, wild life 009

Melanistic squirrel watched by melanistic cat:

21 Jan. 2016, wild life 001
__________
Additions:
From reader Simon Hayward, a shy squirrel:
IMG_3866
From reader Victoria P.:
I did not imagine I could get into the house for my camera and come back to find this squirrel still enjoying a backyard mango. But there she was, waiting for her closeup.
2007 squirrel eating mango
From reader Phil F.:
A South African squirrel for you. This guy is from Cape Town. He seems to have an enormous head of hair, but that is his tail wrapped up his back. Mouth wide open – I seem to recall he was making a lot of noise.
squirrel
Diana MacPherson contributes a link from Bored Panda: 20+ Adorable Pics to Celebrate Squirrel Appreciation Day. Go look at them all; they’re great. Here’s one:
cute-squirrel-photography-331__700
From Vitally Bondar

And Grania sent the vital Twi**er link: #SquirrelAppreciationDay. The photos and gifs include Squirrel with Horse Head:

 

The Ark Park is nearly done, still violating the Constitution

January 21, 2016 • 1:00 pm

The Ark Park constructed by Ken Ham’s Answers in Genesis (AiG) organization, featuring a life-sized Noah’s Ark and ancillary amusement, has been plagued by financial and legal troubles. There was difficulty getting enough money to build it (so they issued junk bonds), and then the state shut down its application because AiG wanted to hire only fundamentalist Christians as employees: a violation of federal civil rights law. Apparently, at least according to Newsweek, most of these obstacles have been surmounted and the Ark Park is set to open on July 7. Two issues remain.

Is taxpayer money funding the park? That would be a violation of the First Amendment, for the Ark Park, a literalistic presentation of the Genesis Flood story, is clearly a religious enterprise. According to Newsweek, yes, taxpayers will indeed be paying for the park, although indirectly:

Ham didn’t stand up when an assistant shuffled me [author Linday Tucker] into his office one Friday afternoon. He has railed against the media time and time again for, he says, falsely claiming that taxpayer money is going toward building the ark. When he speaks, he does so slowly, his words even and calculated. “No Kentucky taxpayer money is going to build the Ark Encounter,” he tells me. Several times.

Ham is telling the truth, but it’s a literal interpretation of the truth. The money used to build Ark Encounter came from donations of almost $30 million, plus $62 million in high-risk, unrated municipal bonds backed by the project’s future revenues. If Ark Encounter never makes significant profits (and bond documents warn that it may not), neither the city nor AiG is on the hook for the bond money. However, according to Mike Zovath, chief actions officer for AiG and Ark Encounter, the millions in tax dollars that will be rebated through the formation of the aforementioned TIF district* could go toward repaying the bonds and funding future attractions. What neither of them mentioned in conversations with me or in their many blog posts on the subject is that, as part of the TIF agreement, employees working within the TIF district will be subject to a 2 percent employment tax on gross wages for the next 30 years. In other words, $2 out of every $100 earned by people working at or around the park will go directly to paying off the attraction. So while tax dollars might not actually have been used tobuild the ark, a boatload that would otherwise go back into the community will instead be used to pay off Ark Encounter’s debt.

*A “TIF district” is a “tax incentive financing district,” and within this one, which encompasses the park and 1.25 miles around it, 75% of sales and real estate taxes collected go back to The Ark Encounter project. This is separate from the 2% employment tax. In both cases money that would go to the state is diverted to the religious enterprise.

Is the Ark Encounter violating civil rights laws? It’s not clear. The Park’s application was initially rejected because it vowed to have discriminatory hiring based on religion (something the park at first said it wouldn’t practice), asking employees to sign statements including “salvation testimony” and “a creationist statement of faith.” AiG objected, and the issue, as far as I know, is still in the courts, where the creationist group claims that it needs to hire on the basis of religion, for not doing so is a form of religious discrimination:

When I asked AiG general counsel John Pence about the company’s revoked promise of non-discriminatory hiring, he referred me to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. “That allows religious organizations to discriminate in hiring,” he says. “If you can’t hire religious people for a religious organization, you can’t function as a religious organization.”

But should taxpayers have to pay for that discrimination? Even Williamstown Mayor Rick Skinner, who has been criticized for being overly optimistic about the ark project, says no. “I don’t think they can do that and expect to get the tourism rebate from the state,” he tellsNewsweek.

“AiG is confusing what they have the right to do as a private organization with what taxpayers are required to fund,” says Greg Lipper, senior litigation counsel for Americans United for Separation of Church and State. “They’re saying Kentucky taxpayers should pay for them to expand a religious ministry. That kind of argument would make Thomas Jefferson turn in his grave.”

Although people have warned that the park will tank financially, drawing few visitors, I don’t agree. The Creation Museum makes lots of dosh, and I don’t see why the Ark Park, a monument to Recreational Confirmation Bias, wouldn’t as well. Or so I predict.

0129noahsark02
The 510-foot Ark in statu nascendi (photo courtesy of Answers in Genesis)

Scottish university joins the costume censorship spree

January 21, 2016 • 10:30 am

First the “politically correct” censorship of costumes, Halloween or otherwise, spread throughout U.S. colleges; then it leaped the Atlantic to England, where many universities are unbearably censorious. Now, however, it’s spread to Scotland, a land of what I thought were sensible and level-headed folk. If you go to yesterday’s Scotsman, you’ll find this story (click on the screenshot below to get to it):

Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 8.44.19 AM

What, exactly, is banned? According to the article, “offensive fancy dress costumes” as well as “Mexicans, gangsters, mental patients and ‘camp men’”. Now I don’t know what “camp men” are, but rather than look it up I’ll ask readers to enlighten me. And, as usual, the ban is imposed not by the University, but by its student union:

The Edinburgh University Students’ Association (EUSA) has previously been criticised for excessive political correctness, introduced the rules following a series of scandals involving students “blacking up”.

Students have been told: “You may not intend to hurt anyone when picking out your costume, and you may not even think there’s a problem, but it’s important to consider the impact your choices will have.

“It is also not acceptable to use props to emphasise racial characteristics in order to convey an individual or character. A good costume should be clear enough that you do not need racial or cultural additions.”

Well, of course I think it’s terribly offensive to don blackface, given the history of how that was used (though I still wouldn’t ban it), but “cultural additions”? What’s wrong with looking like Mexicans that’s not wrong with looking like geishas or samurai? And even if it’s done to satirize a culture (something I again deplore), it’s still free speech. Who decides which costumes are offensive and which are not? Will Edinburgh Uni have a student Costume Police?

Apparently this isn’t the first time Scottish universities have imposed bans on websites, newspapers, and even songs:

Edinburgh was recently ranked as one of the most “ban happy” universities in Spiked magazine’s, Free Speech University Rankings 2016.

Tom Slater, the coordinator of the rankings, said: “The university that produced David Hume is banning fancy dress.

“Edinburgh was among the worst universities we assessed nationwide. The Edinburgh Union Students’ Association, in particular, has outdone itself.”

He added: “Our research shows that in Scotland – as it is across the country – campus censorship is hitting epidemic proportions.”

Previous bans made by EUSA have included social media site UniLad, Page 3 and Robin Thicke’s hit, Blurred Lines from being played on campus.

. . . Dundee University has also faced criticism after banning Pro-life groups in 2014 – despite them having their own stall on campus for years before.

And Stirling University introduced a policy to not “share a platform with any organisation deemed to be racist or or fascist by the National Union of Students.”

And yet, as happens so often, the Edinburgh student union argues that it’s actually promoting free speech!:

EUSA President, Jonny Ross Tatam, said their policies are intended “to broaden free speech, not restrict it. We’re committed to ensuring everyone feels able to participate in debate and discussion within our venues.”

This is a classic example of Orwellian doublespeak: censorship is really free speech! But how, exactly, is banning costumes going to broaden free speech? The way to do that is to unban those costumes, and then ensure that those who oppose them are able to state their opinions. Words versus words, or words versus costumes—that is the way to go.  If someone wearing a “camp man” costume somehow silences the opponents of such dress, that’s a pretty pathetic situation.

In the end, if these students really want to change the world, they should do so not by silencing their political opponents but by debating them.

Fortunately, most of the comments on the article aren’t on board with censorship. Here are two:

Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 9.01.39 AM

h/t: Su