Bill Maher on accidental bipartisanship

October 2, 2026 • 8:15 am

This week Bill Maher’s comedy/news bit on “Real Time” mourns the lack of bipartisanship in American politics—something that was once admired but now is denigrated. His two examples of how both parties contributed to improving society involve drugs—the dramatic decrease of death from street drugs like fentanyl as well as the price drops in widely-used prescription drugs. Maher argues that this wasn’t due to deliberate collaboration between the Dems and GOP, but was “accidental bipartisanship”:each party independently did things that contributed to the overall welfare.

People aren’t going to be happy with Maher saying that the GOP did anything worthwhile, though.

The guests you see on the panel are the journalists Jonathan Swan and James Kirchick. 

Bill Maher’s “new rule”: the young are puppeteering the lunatrocracy

August 29, 2026 • 11:15 am

In yesterday’s “Real Time” comedy-and-politics bit, Bill Maher calls attention to the fact that much of the real work in Congress isn’t done by the older Senators and Representatives, but rather by their staff, who may be “too young.”

In other words, the 20-somethings are writing the bills, and, as Maher said, “the kids are not all right.”  In Maher’s view, these kids , whatever their politics, grew up on social media, and on the Left they’re too woke and on the Right they’re too conservative and racist (40% of Republican staffers are fans of Nick Fuentes!). Neither side, he maintains, understands the art of compromise and of rational analysis aimed at producing solution.  The Democrats, though, seem to get most of Maher’s flak.  At the end he says, “The problem isn’t just the old farts; maybe it’s also the new little shits.”

Maher’s guests on this segment include Byron Donalds, a Republican Congressman from Florida, and Molly Jong-Fast, author and host of the Fast Politics podcast (as well as the daughter of Erica Jong).

 

Barack Obama, Larry David, and the tan suit

August 18, 2026 • 11:00 am

This comedy video, starring Barack Obama and Larry David, shows that the ex-President is a natural actor and comedian. (I’ve added a Facebook post below that also shows Obama’s comedic talents.) Here the Calm Man interacts with the Neurotic Man.  As for the tan-suit thing, Wikipedia has whoe article on “Barack Obama and tan suit controversy,” which includes this:

On August 28, 2014, President Barack Obama held a press conference about the situation regarding ISIS in Syria, and how the U.S. military was planning to respond to it. At the conference, Obama said that the U.S. had yet to develop a plan regarding the removal of ISIS, and talked extensively about his concerns in the region. During the conference he wore a tan suit, which until that point was uncommon for Obama.

Although it is common for men to wear light-colored suits in Washington during the summer due to the city’s heat and humidity, it was seen by conservative commentator and Fox Business Network host Lou Dobbs as “shocking to a lot of people”.[6] The controversy was seen in the context of the slow news season before the run-up to the 2014 election campaign. The suit received mixed reviews from a sartorial perspective.

At the time, the unusual attention given to a male leader’s fashion choices was contrasted with that of his 2008 Democratic rival Hillary Clinton’s “regular experience” as a woman in politics.

This bit gives a fictitious backstory about the Obama Tan Suit Incident, showing that it was all Larry David’s fault when he interacts with a mango smoothie. This could have been right out of “Curb Your Enthusiasm“:

Here’s Obama in an actual tan suit worn when he was President:

President Barack Obama meets with John F. Tefft, U.S. Ambassador to Russia, in the Oval Office, Aug. 28, 2014. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza). Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain

Merilee found this video of Barack being funny at other times.

Merilee found this video of Barack being funny at other times.

Bill Maher’s new rule re Fauci

August 9, 2026 • 9:30 am

This week’s Real Time with Bill Maher comedy-and-news bit takes up Rand Paul’s jihad against Anthony Fauci, which includes Paul’s publishing Fauci’s personal diary, which showed Fauci basking in his celebrity.

Maher concludes that Fauci is, at the same time, “an esteemed, dedicated public servant” and a “vain, flawed bureaucrat”.  As Maher notes, Fauci got some stuff wrong, but was not deliberately lying; as Maher says, “science is complicated.” And I agree with Maher that “we should not call people criminals for just the part they got wrong.”

Yes, Fauci did pressure scientists to publish a “wet market” conclusion about the origin of covid, but its origin is irrelevant to how the pandemic should have been handled.  But Fauci nevertheless fell prey, as did Trump, to the addiction to worship that comes with fame. In fact, Maher plays a game, giving quotes from either Trump or Fauci’s diary and asking the viewer to decide “who said it.” Maher gets a dig at “progressives,” noting that Julia Roberts called Fauci “Jesus with a Petri dixh.”

But in the end Maher concludes that Fauci put in a lot of service to the country, but was not a criminal, even though the adulation he received might have made him more dogmatic.  It’s sad that Fauci became seduced by celebrity, but he’s human and that’s a human tendency.

The guests shown are journalists Tara Palmeri and Matt Welch.

Bill Maher’s latest bit: Communism, the DSA, and the Democrats

August 1, 2026 • 8:15 am

Bill Maher’s back after his summer vacation, and his latest “new rule” bit starts in with some hard criticism of the “far far Left”—the progressives—for being close to Communists, and the Democratic Socialists of America for using Communist jargon. I’ve talked before about the DSA’s platform, which includes abolishing the Senate and ditching the President and Supreme Court. as well as getting rid of the police and jails.  But some of them go further, advocating seizing private property and “seizing the means of production”—straight out of Marx.

As for the pathetically small sample of 13 Democrats (10 in Congress) who signed the “Promise to America” (text at the link), the Dallas Express gives the list:

  • Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-NY) — Co-leading the initiative
  • Rep. Adam Gray (D-CA) — Co-leading the initiative
  • Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ)
  • Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV)
  • Rep. Don Davis (D-NC)
  • Rep. Vicente Gonzalez Jr. (D-TX)
  • Rep. Laura Gillen (D-NY)
  • Rep. Janelle Bynum (D-OR)
  • Rep. Kristin McDonald Rivet (D-MI)
  • Rep. Maggie Goodlander (D-NH)
  • Jessica Killin (candidate)
  • Marlene Galán Woods (candidate)
  • Bobby Pulido (candidate)

The pledge is not some kind of right-wing manifesto, but a reasonable centrist Democratic view. I’m appalled that more Democrats in Congress wouldn’t sign it.

Oh, and my favorite Democratic curmudgeon, James Carville, appears with a quote about the “progressives”:

“There’s just some shit that I can’t be in the same tent with. . I”m done. I’m not in that fucking political party.”

The guests are Erin Brokovitch, Scott Galloway, and Peter Hamby, with the last two shown in this bit.

Oh, and I think the DSA members aren’t wearing masks to ward off covid; I believe they’re doing it to hide their identities.

The frightening DSA agenda

July 28, 2026 • 8:30 am

Members and acolytes of the Democratic Socialists of America are making inroads into the Democratic Party, so it’s useful to see what they stand for.  They may not enact all these pledges, but they will try.  Click on the screenshot below to see their recently published program.

No capitalism and NO BILLS!

But what if you want a different house from the one that the government gives you? Too bad!  But who’s gonna pay for all those free houses, medicine, and transportation? I suspect they’ll just say “tax the rich,” the common DSA answer. But there’s not enough money there to begin to pay for all the stuff promised above.

And no more law enforcement. Eventually, everyone will be law-abiding!

There’s this of course; a major plank of the DSA is the elimination of Israel (and, not said explicitly) and of Jews as well. Invoking the “right of return” of all descendants of Arabs who fled Israel in 1948 would lead to the elimination of Israel. Not a word about the actual genocide of Hamas and the terrorism of the Palestinian Authority.

. . and here goes the separation of powers carefully confected by the Founders:

This comes pretty close to Communism:

And some cant:

To achieve this future, our class must organize. The Democratic Socialists of America is building a party whose goal is a democratic society of the working class. Our enemies are not just individual bosses, but the entire global system of capital; not just this or that cop, judge, or president, but the entire anti-democratic structure of our society. We are workers fighting to transform society: to win the battle for democracy, draft a new constitution, and create a democratic socialist republic.

DSA has written this program for ending capitalist oligarchy and creating a real democracy. Some of these demands may be won under our current system, but we know complete victory will require building a new society from the ground up. We push these demands to their furthest extent today, so we can fight for their fullest realization in a socialist future. Join us.

But is that real democracy. What if people don’t want to run the big corporations or get rid of capitalism?

I don’t usually quote the conservative op-eds of the WSJ, but a new editorial-board op-ed describes the unconstitutionality of the DSA program:

The left has long targeted the Electoral College because it thwarts the ability of the most populous states to dominate presidential elections. But in its latest manifesto, “Workers Deserve More,” the DSA says it wants to “replace the President and Supreme Court with an executive and judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress.” It also wants to “abolish the Senate.” James Madison, call your office.

It’s important to understand how radical this is, essentially blowing up the Constitution’s separation of powers. Letting Congress choose the President means adopting the parliamentary system that prevails in Britain. It would essentially remove the presidential veto power that the Founders designed as a check on the legislative passions of the day.

Ditto for ending an independent judiciary, which is a check against legislative and executive violation of individual rights. Third World dictators seek to make the judiciary subservient to the ruling party for this reason, as they did in Venezuela, and as Mexico’s Morena party is now attempting to do.

The left loathes the Senate because it is also a restraint on temporary majorities. The Senate’s design, with two Members from each state, gives an equal voice to small and large states. This prevents dominance by California, New York and Texas. And it buttresses the federalist principles at the core of the Constitution’s design, which preserves certain powers to the states as a check on Washington, D.C.’s commandments.

The Senate’s six-year terms are another check on momentary House majorities elected every two years. The Founders’ original design that Senators be elected by state legislatures has given way to direct election. But the 60-vote filibuster rule has developed as an alternative check on radical change by narrow majorities.

Article V of the Constitution says “no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.” This means the Senate couldn’t be abolished without the consent of every state, assuming the DSA doesn’t ignore the Constitution, as some on the left might want to do.

. . . . The common denominator in all of these DSA proposals is eliminating barriers to rapid, radical change. The socialists want a single-branch legislature that can sweep into power in a single election, dominate the President, and neuter the judiciary as a check on that power. With those checks gone, they can impose their agenda that will be nearly impossible to undo.

The job of Republicans now, and Democrats who have the guts, is to educate the country about this agenda. Not by doing what President Trump does and call them “communists.” That general attack won’t resonate with young people who don’t know what communism is.

Well, read the platform and get yourself educated. Sadly, young people may still learn what communism is, but they also have to study history to see how it worked out. They can’t do that on their phones.

Marco Rubio, the DSA, and Communism

July 25, 2026 • 9:15 am

Here’s a 2½-minute video of Secretary of State Marco Rubio talking about socialism, communism, and his vision of America. It’s a bit Ayn Rand-ish, and I ignored the bit about God. (I don’t know the narrator, but it appears to be a “media personality” named Jillian Michaels, a woman of conservative views.

Rubio is speaking about “radical leftism” and its goal of “social justice” that, he thinks, is really acting out a mindset of “poisonous resentment cloaked in the language of equality and justice and liberation. . . “.

Have a listen and tell me that part of this doesn’t resonate with you; and forget it’s Marco Rubio speaking and just listen to the message. Of course I’ll get labeled an “alt-righter” for posting this, but I don’t care. I sent the video to several of my center-left friends, and in general they liked it (except for the God part).