The Russian genocide against Ukraine

October 15, 2026 • 9:50 am

Here I contend that although there is no “genocide” being committed by Israel against Gaza or Palestinians as a whole, Russia is committing genocide of the Ukrainians. That the former is loudly touted but false, but the latter is not that newsworthy but is arguably true, shows that the world holds a double standard with regard to “genocide”.

Here I want to concentrate not on Israel’s war with Hamas, which I’ve discussed many times, but on Ukraine, which is being largely ignored by the U.S. (and by Western protestors), and is being mistreated. Indeed, the U.S., with its lifting sanctions on Russian diesel and its threats to withhold intelligence from Ukraine, is beginning to help Russia with this “genocide.”

The UN’s 1948 Genocide Convention defines genocide this way (Article II):

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

The definition requires not only intent to destroy a group, but examples of acts undertaken to fulfill that intent.  The arguments against an Israeli “genocide” of Palestinians is not met by either the intent or the actions.  Although there are isolated statements by Israeli officials that could be interpreted as intent, the actions of the IDF have been directed at killing the enemy (Hamas) and avoiding wiping out Palestinians as a while. You’ve heard the counterarguments to this: the warning of Gazan civilians by the IDF before strikes, the designation of “safe zones”, the vaccination of 1.1 Gazan children by the WHO and Israel, and so on.

What is Russia doing to Ukraine? Let me count the ways:

The transfer of children from Ukraine to Russia. According to the UN itself,  Russia is deporting Ukrainian children on a large scale, amounting to crimes against humanity:

Russian authorities committed the crimes against humanity of deportation and forcible transfer of children, and of their enforced disappearance, the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine said in its latest report to the Human Rights Council, which is complemented by a conference room paper.

Thousands of children have been deported to the Russian Federation or transferred to occupied areas in Ukraine by Russian authorities, according to the Commission. It has so far verified the deportation or transfer of over 1,200 children from five regions in Ukraine.

Shortly before the full-scale invasion, the Russian authorities undertook large-scale relocations, which they justified as “evacuations” due to the risks of the armed conflict. But the Commission found that four years later, 80 per cent of the children from the documented cases have not been returned. This contravenes international humanitarian law, under which evacuations can only be temporary for compelling reasons of health, medical treatment or safety.

Mass murder of Ukrainian civilians and prisoners of war. One example is the Bucha massacre enacted by Russia soon after it invaded Ukraine in 2022.  Over 400 people were executed, and this was documented by the UN Commissioner for Human Rights.

The denial of Ukrainian statehood.  This could also be seen as “rhetoric,” but it was not an offhand statement, but a formal speech by Russia’s President Putin in February, 2022.  It includes these statements:

“Modern Ukraine was entirely created by Russia, more precisely, Bolshevik, communist Russia. This process began immediately after the revolution of 1917…

“Ukraine never had a tradition of genuine statehood.”

Grok adds this, which speaks to an intent to destroy a “national group”:

Officials and state-aligned figures (including Dmitry Medvedev) have repeatedly denied Ukrainian statehood or identity, with statements calling for the elimination of Ukrainian political independence, language/education in Ukrainian, or the state itself so that “not even ashes remain” or that hostile Ukraine “does not exist anymore.” State media and ideologues have used language of “de-Ukrainization,” “denazification” as erasure of Ukrainian distinctiveness, and eliminationist framing. In occupied territories, authorities have systematically replaced Ukrainian curricula and language instruction with Russian ones, suppressed Ukrainian books/culture, renamed places, imposed Russian citizenship and passports, and promoted Russian patriotic/military education. Human Rights Watch and others have documented forced Russification of education, threats to parents for Ukrainian-language remote learning, and erasure of Ukrainian identity markers. Proponents argue this pattern shows intent to destroy the Ukrainian national group “as such” by eliminating its independent existence and identity, not merely to win a war or change a government.

Widespread and continuous targeting of civilians.  Wikipedia has a long article on “Russian attacks on civilians in the Russo-Ukrainian War (2022-present” (see also the article on “War crimes in the Russo-Ukrainian War (2022-present“). I quote from the first article (the site documents the statements):

During the Russo-Ukrainian War (2022–present), the Russian military has continuously carried out deliberate attacks against civilian targets[1][2][3] and indiscriminate attacks in densely populated areas.[4] The United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine says the Russian military exposed the civilian population to unnecessary and disproportionate harm by using cluster bombs[5][6][7][8] and by firing other weapons with wide-area effects into civilian areas, such as missiles, heavy artillery shells, and multiple launch rockets.[7] As of 2026, the attacks had resulted in between the UN-documented 16,000[9] and an estimated 40,000 dead civilians.[10] On 22 April 2022, the UN reported that of the 2,343 civilian casualties it had been able to document, it could confirm 92.3% of these deaths were as a result of the actions of the Russian armed forces.[11]

On 5 July 2022, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Michelle Bachelet, reported that most civilian casualties documented by her office had been caused by the Russian army’s use of explosive weapons with wide-area effects in populated areas, calling it “indisputable.”[12] By 30 June 2023, OHCHR assessed that 90.5% of all civilian deaths were caused by such indiscriminate attacks and that 84.2% of them were recorded in Ukrainian-held territory.[l

. . .The deadliest Russian attacks on civilians during the war have been the Mariupol theatre airstrike and the Bucha massacre, which are estimated to have killed hundreds. Other strikes on civilians with high casualties include the April 2022 Kramatorsk railway station attack (which killed 63); 3 March 2022 Chernihiv bombing (which killed 47); the July 2022 Chasiv Yar missile strike (which killed 46), the Zaporizhzhia civilian convoy attack (which killed 32), the 2023 Dnipro residential building airstrike (which killed 46), the 2023 Hroza missile attack (which killed 59), and the 2025 Sumy airstrike (which killed 35 people).[18]

In total, Russia has attacked more than 3000 health care targets,[19] more than 4000 schools and universities,[20] more than 2.5 million housing units,[21] more than 700 churches,[22] and killed more than 15,000 civilians as of February 2026.[23]

There is no similar article on “Ukrainian attacks on civilians in the Russo-Ukrainian war”, but an Al-Jazeera article reports a few:

The war, which began with the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, has seen both sides increasingly targeting civilian infrastructure.

According to an analysis by Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED), Russian forces carried out 29,792 attacks on Ukraine in 2022. Of these, 1,635, more than 5 percent, hit civilian infrastructure, including residential, energy, healthcare and education facilities.

By August 2026, the number of Russian attacks on civilian infrastructure in Ukraine had risen to 7,170, representing more than 13 percent of all Russian attacks on the country.

The same ACLED analysis recorded 245 Ukrainian attacks in Russia in 2022, with 24 of those – about 10 percent – targeting civilian infrastructure. By August 2026, that figure had risen to 3,560 attacks, or 27 percent of all Ukrainian attacks in Russia.

Advertisement

AD

Although a larger share of Ukrainian attacks targeted civilian infrastructure, Russia carried out far more attacks overall.

Indeed: 24 Ukrainian attacks targeted Russian civilian infrastructure as opposed to 1,635 attacks in the opposite direction: a 65-fold difference.  And Russia seems to be stepping up its attacks right now, as I hear of missiles targeting apartment buildings in Ukraine on almost a daily basis. I don’t know anything about accusation that Russia or Ukraine embeds its military among civilians to deliberately jack up the toll of civilians (this is what Hamas does), so I can’t speak to it with regard to this conflict.

The “war crimes” article in Wikipedia starts this way:

During the Russo-Ukrainian war (2022–present) starting with the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Russian military and authorities have committed war crimes, such as deliberate attacks against civilian targets, including on hospitals, medical facilities and on the energy grid;[1][2][3] indiscriminate attacks on densely populated areas; the abduction, torture and murder of civilians; forced deportations; sexual violence; destruction of cultural heritage; and the killing and torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war.[4][5][6][7]

What happened is clear: Russia believes Ukraine should be a part of Russia, and they invaded to effect that—for at least part of Ukraine. Without that invasion, there would be no war (sound familiar?).  Russia continues to attack civilian facilities in Ukraine and Ukraine is defending itself with counterattacks, with the bulk of them targeting Ukrainian military facilities or infrastructure that helps the military.  If Russia withdrew, the war would end.

To me, all of this adds up to a Russian genocide, one at least determined to wipe out the “Ukrainian” part of Ukraine. You can argue about whether that is targeting a national group, but clearly some war crimes and crimes against humanity are going on.

My purpose is not to dispel the “genocide” libel against Israel, which is ridiculous, but to show that that label applies far more clearly to Russia in its dealings with Ukraine. I find it disturbing that people in the West, especially the young people who holler about Israel, aren’t at least as concerned with the Russo-Ukraine war.  Hamas said it would keep trying to get rid of Israel, which is its primary aim, but Russia is, right now, trying to destroy Ukraine.

Why the relative silence?  Well, we know that if Jews are involved they take most of the heat, but the Russia situation is that of an unprovoked invasion that could blossom into further Russian attempts to take over other countries, like the Baltic states. The obligation of the West to defend Ukraine is not diplomatic but moral. It’s not only the right thing to do—defending a democracy besieged by an autocracy—but could nip further Russian ambitions in the bud.

Readers’ wildlife photos

October 15, 2026 • 8:15 am

Another batch of photos arrived this morning, this time from reader Andrew in Oz.  Andrew’s captions and IDs are indented, and you can enlarge his photos by clicking on them.

Yarra Bend, Melbourne, Australia

These photos were all taken in an hour or so, in a bit of bushland three miles (5 km) from downtown in a city of 3ish million people.

The Birrarung River (also, more commonly, known as the Yarra river). Melbourne’s main river. Often very brown – locally known as the river that flows upside down:

Pacific black duck (Anas superciliosa):

Dusky moorhen (Gallinula tenebrosa):

European honey bee (Apis mellifera). We sometimes call this the feral bee. In, I think, a River Red Gum, (Eucalyptus camaldulensis):

Black-faced cuckooshrike (Coracina novaehollandiae). A cute common name is the Shufflewing – when they settle after flight, they shuffle their wings alternately:

Spotted pardalote (Pardalotus punctatus) – female. Tiny bright little bird – common but hard to see and identify. Today I was lucky:

Spotted pardalote (Pardalotus punctatus) male:

 Red-rumped parrot (Psephotus haematonotus). More usually seen on the ground in small flocks. Surprisingly well camouflaged in the grass – quite easy to almost step on:

Pied currawong (Strepera graculina). Common, beautiful loud meodious song:

Rainbow lorikeet (Trichoglossus moluccanus). One of the most common birds in eastern Australia. Incredibly bright and beautiful – and loud:

Noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala). Another very common bird. A few lines from a review (by noted biologist/author Tim Flannery) of the book “Where Song Began” by Tim Low:

The title of Australia’s most aggressive bird … must go to a rather drab gray member of the honeyeater family known as the noisy miner.

Accused in a scientific paper of “despotic aggressiveness,” the species has been recorded driving off fifty-seven rival types of bird. Indeed the noisy miner’s aggression has led to it becoming “one of the most important mechanisms through which habitat fragmentation and degradation threaten populations of eastern Australian woodland birds.” “They will turn on almost anything,” Low says: “koalas, cows, bats, pigs, snakes, lizards, people,” as well as other birds. And worse, they recruit allies in their bullying, including the aptly named butcher bird—a sharp-beaked, shrike-like predator that the noisy miners leave alone—provided they refrain from taking their eggs and young.

Noisy miners will even recruit humans as allies. Some years ago, a great fracas emanating from a mob of noisy miners outside my house in Sydney induced me to leave my work and investigate. As I stepped outside, the birds fell into silent expectation. Looking down, I saw a python. I got the distinct feeling that the noisy miners expected me to deal with it. But I like pythons, so I left it and returned inside. The howl of disappointed rage emerging simultaneously from dozens of beaks had to be heard to be believed. To get any peace, I was forced to move the snake.

Thursday: Hili dialogue

October 15, 2026 • 6:45 am

Welcome to Thursday, October 15, 2026, and National I Love Lucy Day. Why today? The link tells all:

On October 15, 1951, I Love Lucy burst onto the American television scene and immediately began making history. In a revolutionary move, it became the first scripted program to be filmed in front of a live studio audience. To make this happen, the studio famously knocked a hole through a concrete wall, building theater-style seating to welcome fans to see the magic happen in person—for free! This innovative format and the show’s undeniable charm led to five Emmy Awards and countless nominations.

The show ran for six seasons.  Here is what I think is the most famous scene from the show, when Lucy and Ethel (Vivian Vance) are working at a chocolate factory:

It’s also Global Handwashing Day, National Cheese Curd Day, National Chicken Cacciatore Day, National Lemon Bar Day, National Mushroom Day, National Real Sugar Day, National Red Wine Day, National Roast Pheasant Day, and National Roast Pheasant Day.

Posting will be lighter than usual for a while; among the issues with my operated-on eye is the sudden appearance of a small retinal tear, which was repaired with laser surgery two days ago.  More regular checking by doctors, involving trips downtown, will ensue.  On the upside, I saw this rabbit on the way to work this morning; he is always around in the early morning, and I’ve named him Rocky Bun-Bun Coyne:

Here’s a photo taken 12 years ago yesterday: I’m cuddling Hili while wearing the shirt embroidered by Hiroko with Hili’s likeness:

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the October 15 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*The Israeli elections are on Tuesday, October 27, and a lot is at stake, especially whether Netanyahu remains as Prime Minister. Over at the Free Press, Yonah Jeremy Bob, a reporter for the Jerusalem Post, suggests that Gadi Eisenkot, former head of the IDF, might be a likely replacement.

I first met Gadi Eisenkot in March 2017 at Israel’s parliament, the Knesset. At the time, he was the chief of the Israeli military and he was explaining to legislators that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) were handling a new challenge from Hamas. The terrorist group was operating freely within the tunnel network it had built beneath Gaza, the extent of which had first been revealed in an assault on Israel a few years before.

As he explained the crisis, Eisenkot struck me immediately as amiable and much more subtle in expression than you might expect from a typical commanding general. And that ability—to be commanding in practice but project the aura of an everyday person—is part of the magic that could make him Israel’s next leader.

As of this week, his Yashar party is topping the polls in the election to be held on October 27, with about 22 percent of the vote compared with 20 percent for Netanyahu’s Likud party. Although the most likely election scenario is a deadlock leading to a second round between Eisenkot and Netanyahu, Eisenkot is widely viewed as having a better chance to build a majority coalition after the election, as a large share of seats will likely go to parties that oppose Netanyahu on similar grounds.

Eisenkot, 66, has a public image that is relatable to less-elite Israelis, including his lack of fluency in English. He is capitalizing on being the un-Netanyahu—someone with little in-your-face charisma but who underneath projects a depth of power that is undeniable.

Eisenkot is from Eilat, which is known globally as a prized resort. But internally in Israel, for locals who live there, it is known as a more depressed development town. He would be the first prime minister of Moroccan descent, as opposed to the European-Israeli background typical of his predecessors.

His background has helped him unexpectedly nab some support from Israel’s large Sephardic population. Though they typically support Netanyahu and right-wing coalitions, many of them see Eisenkot as personally representing them.

Eisenkot’s humble persona and roots also distinguish him from Netanyahu’s other top rival, Naftali Bennett. Bennett, the right-wing pol who was prime minister for just over a year from 2021 to 2022, differs from Netanyahu on policy in many of the same ways as Eisenkot. Yet Bennett has the same smooth delivery and elite background as the current prime minister, while Eisenkot projects a less polished authenticity that may remind some Israelis of simpler times in their history.

. . .Looking forward, the largest policy difference between Eisenkot and Netanyahu isn’t Gaza, but the West Bank.

Both intend to crack down on Palestinian terrorism there, which according to Israel’s Shin Bet security service involves 1,000 attempted attacks per year, and between around 30 to 170 successful attacks.

Yet Eisenkot also accuses Netanyahu of letting the West Bank transform into a chaotic maelstrom of Jewish extremist violence against innocent Palestinians. The prime minister, Eisenkot says, has empowered right-wing allies who are encouraging the trend, including ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir and Shin Bet director David Zini.

. . .Whether or not he chooses it, the gaze of every Israeli prime minister is inevitably drawn overseas, with Iran looming as the largest adversary. Eisenkot says he would focus on two major direct threats: nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles.

He has an innovative approach to the nuclear issue, which involves persuading the U.S. to enforce a “kill zone” around the few areas where Iran’s 60-percent enriched uranium (close to weaponized levels) is still underground.

. . .Eisenkot is more open to working with other political interests to replace Hamas. For example, he dislikes the PA, but he concurs with most of Israel’s defense establishment that Hamas is much worse than the PA—if stuck choosing between the two.

While Eisenkot wants to preserve a Gaza security corridor, he would likely accept a smaller corridor than Netanyahu, if it preserves the military high ground. He is ready to agree to the thrust of the Trump deal or other initiatives which would be a step toward partial Hamas disarmament. That might require Israel, for example, to commit more aid for the rebuilding of Gaza, but it could also help regain the confidence of foreign allies.

In Lebanon, the largest difference between Netanyahu and Eisenkot would probably be the role of a third party: France. Eisenkot is committed to restoring Paris to a significant mediation role in Lebanon while Netanyahu has looked to pick fights with France and other traditional European allies nonstop in every arena. The split reflects Eisenkot’s belief that he can vigorously pursue Israel’s security interests while also inviting European cooperation in ways that could rebuild trust over time.

. . . If American diplomats are greeted by an amiable Israeli prime minister who wants to say yes to Western normalization initiatives, Eisenkot believes, possibly naively, that the current hostile dynamic can be changed fundamentally, even if he cannot endorse all Western priorities.

I’m pretty sure that even if Eisenkot becomes PM, the worldwide damnation of Israel won’t abate, despite the fact that he’s more receptive to Western suggestions and the governance of Gaza by the PA. The damnation will continue not because of Netanyahu, but because Israel is a Jewish state.

*And on that subject, over at It’s Noon In Israel, Amit Segal gives four reasons why Trump hasn’t endorsed Netanyahu.

So why, 13 days before Israelis vote, is he sitting this one out? I’d suggest four reasons.

The first is Budapest. Trump did everything he could to get Viktor Orbán reelected in Hungary, and Orbán lost. Trump does not like being seen with losers. He likes it even less when he’s photographed endorsing them. He will put his name on an Israeli candidate only if he is sure his name is what gets them over the line. Currently, neither candidate in Israel looks likely to be one Truth Social post from victory.

Trump may be especially conscious of that risk. A week after Israelis vote, Americans go to the polls for the midterms, with all 435 House seats and 35 Senate seats up for grabs. If Trump’s writ runs overseas, it’s a show of strength. If Israelis reject his candidate, it could be a preview of more rejections to come.

The second is the polls. The numbers sitting on desks in the White House veer closer to the majority of Israeli polls than the more rare ones predicting a comfortable Netanyahu win. The White House runs its own polls in the country. If those surveys begin to show Netanyahu closing the gap in the final week, the math could change.

The third is the cat. Hebrew has an idiom for a falling-out: a black cat has passed between them. I wouldn’t go so far as black. But a dark shade of gray cat has certainly passed between Trump and Netanyahu. In July, Netanyahu flew to Washington hoping for a public show of support. According to Axios, when the race came up, Netanyahu hesitated, and an adviser stepped in: “Mr. President, he is winning.” The endorsement never came. Since then, Trump has kept pressing Israel to halt the targeted strikes in Gaza that are stalling his 20-point plan.

The fourth is Tucker Carlson. Not the man himself, but the impression he has helped create that a slice of Republican voters is allergic to Israel. Whether or not that electorate is real, it is doubtful that the conversation in the Oval Office centers around how to bring Bibi into the national conversation before the midterms.

A senior White House official put the odds to me plainly. A 60 percent chance we stay out. A 30 percent chance we help Netanyahu. A 10 percent chance we help the other one.

Trump’s endorsement woiuld likely help Netanyahu in his goal to remain PM, for Trump has historically appealed to those who supported Netanyahu in Israel: the right-wingers.  When I asked Grok about Netanyahu’s chances, it told me this:

Roughly 30–40% chance of heading a new majority government, but a substantially higher chance (likely 60–80%+) of remaining in office in the near term as caretaker prime minister if there is a deadlock.
It added that on betting platforms, Eisenkot is the favorite (48% chance among all candidates) to replace Netanyahu.
*Anonymous sources have provided more information on why the government is investigating Ilhan Omar; apparently it has to do with immigration matters rather than her family finances. (There’s apparently a separate investigation of finances.)

The federal investigation that prompted the search of Rep. Ilhan Omar’s D.C. residence on Monday centers on claims that she or her late father may have lied on decades-old immigration paperwork to secure legal status and eventually U.S. citizenship, three people familiar with the matter said.

Omar — a Minnesota Democrat who was born in Somalia and fled civil war there with her family before eventually immigrating to the United States in 1995 — has repeatedly rejected such allegations, which have circulated in conservative media for years. She dismissed them again in a statement Monday as “baseless lies and smear campaigns.”

It is extremely unusual for federal agents to take public investigative actions related to a member of Congress just weeks before an election because doing so could cast a candidate who is not criminally charged in a negative light.

In Omar’s case, the investigation is notable for other reasons as well: It involves long-ago paperwork from when she was a teenager, and Omar is a lawmaker who has frequently been singled out for criticism and vitriol by President Donald Trump and his allies.

The president condemned her again in a social media post Tuesday, after U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro told Fox News that her office had launched a separate inquiry into Omar’s financial disclosure forms — a matter that has previously drawn the attention of House Republicans.

The immigration-related inquiry, which could result in fraud charges and potentially an attempt by the Justice Department to strip Omar of her citizenship, is based on a renewed look at her immigration history launched earlier this year by Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the investigative arm of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the people familiar with the matter said.

The agency had declined to move forward with such a probe years earlierbased on similar allegations, said one of the individuals, who is a former immigration official.

That person and a Trump administration official said agents now are especiallyfocused on whether Omar or her father, Nur Omar Mohamed, intentionally misstated her birth date on immigration paperwork so she could be eligible to derive citizenship through him as a minor when he was naturalized in 2000.

Both of them, and a third person familiar with the investigation, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss details that have not been made public.

Investigators have also scrutinized whether Omar’s father may have purposefully lied or omitted information on his past military service as he sought legal status in the United States before he became a citizen, the Trump administration official said. Mohamed died in 2020.

I suppose these things are worthy of investigation if there is any credible evidence for them, but two things make me doubtful. First, it smacks of retribution from Trump, who dislikes Omar (to be sure, I do, too), and is a non-urgent matter that was publicly announced within the 60-day window preceding her re-election sate—a window that the feds have traditionally avoided. Second, I thought this had all been hashed out and settled long ago.  If there are new data suggesting illegal activity, by all means investigate them after the election. If not, it’s a waste of time.

*Joni Mitchell has become an American citizen after more than 6 decades of living in America.

“Joni Mitchell, Canada.” Loud applause surrounded this call-out at a U.S. citizenship ceremony on Tuesday morning, as Ms. Mitchell was summoned to the front of a room to take her oath.

Wearing a red beret and a navy blue floral shirt, she had been sitting in the front row waiting her turn. Ms. Mitchell, the folk singer known for defining the genre with anthems like “Big Yellow Taxi” and “Woodstock,” later shared a video of the moment on social media, alongside a photo of herself with a U.S. flag in hand and a larger one behind her.

She captioned her post: “A journey that began 62 years ago.”

. . .Ms. Mitchell, now 82, was a young Canadian folk singer with no record deal and only a handful of songs to her name when she arrived in Detroit in the mid-1960s, alongside her husband, Chuck Mitchell, also a musician. They had wed in June 1965 and were looking to make it as artists in America.

Two years later, when their marriage dissolved, Ms. Mitchell traded her sprawling five-bedroom apartment in Detroit (she called it her “tenement castle” in the song “I Had a King”) for a one-bedroom in the Chelsea neighborhood of Manhattan. It was there that she wrote “Chelsea Morning.”

. . .Around that time [1968], she moved to Los Angeles, first to Laurel Canyon in 1968, then to Bel Air in 1975. She would travel between California and British Columbia, Canada, where she had at one time bought a seaside property. She resides in Santa Barbara.

Ms. Mitchell has made no public mention of why she had chosen this moment to embrace U.S. citizenship, and a request for comment to her representative went unanswered.

She had, however, touched upon the issue in 2024 at a performance in Los Angeles roughly two weeks before the presidential election. “I wish I could vote,” she said onstage.

Here’s her tweet:

It’s kind of late for her to begin voting now!

*The WSJ reports (in big print!) that inflation rose to 3.7% in September, though within the last decade it’s been a lot higher than that. A lot of the rise is due to higher energy prices (i.e., gasoline), which affects many other prices. And have you been to the grocery store lately?

Inflation picked up in September, a sign that high energy prices are tightening their squeeze on consumers ahead of next month’s midterm elections.

Consumer prices were up 3.7% in September from a year earlier, the Labor Department said Wednesday, hotter than August’s gain of 3.4%.

That was above the 3.6% rise expected by economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal.

There were signs that high energy prices are starting to leak into other parts of the economy.

Prices excluding food and energy—the so-called core prices, which economists watch to gauge underlying trends—rose 2.6%, above forecasts for a 2.5% increase. Month over month, core prices rose by 0.3%, surprising economists who had expected a 0.2% increase.

“At this point we’re at dangerously elevated levels of inflation,” said Lindsey Piegza, chief economist at Stifel.

High prices have been a political flashpoint for Americans, who have grown fed up with more than five years of inflation. Prices rose much faster in September than average hourly earnings, which increased 3% from a year earlier, marking the sixth month in a row of inflation outpacing wages. That means many Americans are seeing their real incomes fall.

. . . Energy costs drove inflation in September, and high retail prices in October suggest pain at the pump will continue. Prices have soared since the Iran conflict started at the end of February

Gasoline prices last month rose 9.1% from the prior month—a faster pace than August’s 3.9% increase—and are up 34% over the past year. Fuel-oil prices, meanwhile, are up 74% since last September.

Well, a few tenths of one percent doesnt seem so serious to me, but economists worry about and prognosticate about such things. If you look at the record over the last 15 years, though, the rate doesn’t look so large. Here’s the chart from the WSJ.

But there’s more to the story. Here, from today’s NYT email newsletter, is the rate of inflation of particular items and services.  Gas, fuel oil, and airlines fares have far outstripped the general inflation rate.

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is plumping for beef again:

Andrzej: I’m going to sit here.
Hili: Make yourself some coffee first, and while you’re in the kitchen, get something nice for me from the pantry.

In Polish:

Ja: Zamierzam tu usiąść.
Hili: Zrób sobie najpierw kawę, a jak już będziesz w kuchni, to wyjmij ze spiżarni coś dobrego dla mnie.

*******************

From Stacy:

From CinEmma:

From Give Me a Sign:

From Masih: another peaceful protestor sentenced to death:

The Number Ten Cat shows himself off despite the scar from his recent operation to remove a cyst:

From Luana; this appears to be true (see here).

Two from my feed. Look at this beaver!

Here’s a video of some brave women athletes.  You can read the backstory in The Chronicle. Here’s an excerpt:

On Sept. 15, there was something more important to Skyview High School cross country athletes Charlie Garrett and Sierra Retzlaff than their race at Camas High School. The girls felt it was important to make a statement in support of the rights for girls like them not to be forced to compete against biological males.

Let’s Go Washington officials and news personality Brandi Kruse each reported this week that an athlete at Camas High School had competed on both the boys’ cross country and the girls’ cross country teams in the same season. Clark County Today also published an opinion written by Editor Ken Vance about this news.

Garrett, a junior captain of the Skyview team, and Retzlaff, a sophomore, are two of the top runners on their team. Garrett is a past state meet participant. Each of the two have goals they hope to accomplish this season.

But they set those goals aside at that meet three weeks ago.

“We found out a biological boy would be in our race running for Camas,’’ Garrett said. “I decided to step off the line with one of my teammates (Retzlaff) and protest against this. We lined up on the start line like we normally do. Once the gun went off, me and my teammate walked about five meters and then stepped off the course.

“I felt that it was unfair for me and that girls were having our opportunities taken away by something we couldn’t control,’’ Garrett said. “The kid started as a biological male at the beginning of the season and then a week later decided they would like to be entered in girls’ races. It troubles me that spots are being taken away from me at bigger meets like districts, regionals and state. Athletes’ spots are being taken away and scholarships are being taken away.’’

One I reposted from The Auschwitz Memorial:

And two from Professor Emeritus Cobb. I haven’t read these volumes by Darwin and now won’t even try. He corrected the date to 1868:

Having slogged my way through both volumes of Darwin’s 1866 VARIATION OF ANIMALS AND PLANTS UNDER DOMESTICATION all I can say is I’m glad I won’t ever have to read it again. What a load of confused, boring tosh. Not his fault, in a way, but he really didn’t need to go on so.

— Matthew Cobb (@matthewcobb.bsky.social) 2026-10-13T17:57:51.946Z

Sound up for this one:

yall ever just watch a wombat eating grass

— Andrew Lawrence (@ndrew.bsky.social) 2026-10-14T14:07:37.633Z

Readers’ wildlife photos

October 14, 2026 • 8:45 am

Today is the third and last set of photos sent last week, so I am of course in need of more. Send ’em if you got ’em!

The photos today come from reader Jan Malik. Jan’s IDs and notes are indented, and you can enlarge his photo by clicking on them.

In August I had to go to one of Mexico’s southern states for work (the usual story of Americans taking the jobs of hard-working Mexicans). The 12-hour shifts left little time for photography, and only toward the end of my assignment did I manage to spend a full three hours in a small nature preserve. The preserve is maintained by a certain state-owned company with an effective monopoly on oil exploration and processing in Mexico. Soon after entering, I realized that the preserve might well have been a money-laundering enterprise, but nonetheless, I went ahead trying to find interesting arthropods.

The white peacock butterfly (Anartia jatrophae), with a damaged wing, which probably occurred during a not quite successful pupation or immediately after, when the wings are soft and pliable and can get entangled in the exuviae or vegetation:

A leaf-cutter ant from the genus Atta—as evidenced by the sharp spines growing from its thorax. This may be Atta mexicana:

They were busy stripping bare a nearby ficus tree, which from my observations is one of their preferred foods, with supple leaves and twigs that are easy to cut:

More precisely, ficus is not the ants’ food, but raw material for their underground gardens, where they farm and tend to a fungus growing on plant matter, then eat the special tissue produced by the fungus. The fungus (Leucoagaricus gongylophorus) has lost the ability to thrive on its own and depends entirely on the ants for survival. In fact, a leaf-cutter ant’s nest is a consortium of at least three symbiotic organisms—ants, fungus, and bacteria growing on the ants’ exoskeleton, which secrete antifungal compounds to protect the garden from parasitic infections:

These ants are vegetarians (and often dreaded agricultural pests), but occasionally they may collect other arthropods, like this unfortunate caterpillar, which is being carried to an underground nest to be used as fertilized for the fungus:

I first became interested in the small creatures that live unnoticed under our feet after reading, decades ago, a popular science book by Bert Hölldobler and Edward O. Wilson, “Journey to the Ants,” which I highly recommend. The same team also wrote “The Leafcutter Ants: Civilization by Instinct,” which is still on my reading list. Perhaps that book contains the clue to this picture – how two or more ants with such tiny brains can organize their work so they can carry items to their nest together:

Leaving the ants alone, I went deeper into a subtropical grove, where by accident I spotted a supremely camouflaged tree trunk spider (family Hersiliidae), possibly from the genus Neotama. It was perfectly flush with the tree trunk; in fact, after looking away from it for a moment, I had trouble spotting it again. Normally it would have two “tails,” actually elongated spinnerets, at the end of its abdomen, but one of them had broken off on this individual:

Trying to photograph the cryptic spider, I brushed against another tree nearby and something—I thought moss or dirt—broke off. But, seeing several insects milling about around that spot a moment later, it turned out to be an encased termite tunnel, a section of which I had just destroyed. By the look of these nasute soldiers, they are from the genus Nasutitermes (spinning the taxonomic roulette wheel, it may be Nasutitermes corniger). They are completely blind and the first to lay down their lives in defense of their nest, trying to squirt a sticky liquid from their nozzle-like heads to ensnare invaders:

The termite tunnel led to a large bulbous nest. Some birds, like trogons and parakeets, use these structures for nesting—they breach the relatively fragile walls constructed from chewed plant material, saliva, and feces, then let the insects do the hard work of sealing the broken internal runways, thus acquiring a climate-controlled, safe nesting place:

Looking closer, there were two termite castes that appeared at the breach in their fortified tunnel: nasute soldiers, the bodyguards of the colony, and workers, here visible with lighter-colored heads and functional mandibles, trying to mend the breach. They must do it quickly, or marauding ants will invade the nest. Usually, after a breach in the defenses is mended, some straggler soldiers are left outside to die:

There was no shortage of ants in that neighborhood, for a few trees away I saw some turtle ant workers (genus Cephalotes, but I don’t know the species). They acquired the moniker “turtle” because of the soldiers’ flat, armored heads, which they use to block the entrances to their tree nests. They seemed to proceed with their business more deliberately, not in the feverish hurry expected of ants:

Some of them appeared to be carrying their larvae or pupae in their mandibles. These arboreal ants can reportedly control their fall to land back on the tree trunk and safely stick the landing:

This is possibly the spotted red bug (Pachycoris klugii), but they are highly variable so I may be wrong:

This tiny (about 5 mm) larva is probably a species from the bagworm family (Psychidae), which if everything goes well pupates into a small moth. It was crawling slowly, turning its armored head around, searching for anything palatable. The protective case is made from its own silk and plant debris. Adult males are winged, but females of many species stay inside their protective cases for life:

Another arthropod was a common spinybacked orbweaver (Gasteracantha cancriformis). I might have seen this species in New Jersey, but definitely in Texas. Unlike many squishy spiders, this one has a tough carapace and spines, making it a difficult morsel to chew or swallow whole. Its bright color may be an honest, warning signal to predators not of a foul taste or toxicity, but of the risk of choking or throat damage

Leaving the preserve, I spotted this butterfly, which could be a glassy-winged skipper (Xenophanes tryxus). The whitish spots on its wings are actually semi-translucent:

Jesus ‘n’ Mo ‘n’ insults

October 14, 2026 • 7:45 am

The latest Jesus and Mo strip, “fifty”, is a good one, and refers to a BBC article excerpted below. The “pedophilia” question refers to Muhammad’s youngest wife, Aisha, whom he married when she was six. (When the marriage was actually consummated is a vigorously disputed subject.)

Here’s the note that came with the email:

Today’s strip is in response to a story about the revoked death sentence of a Saudi-based Sri Lankan man who insulted Mohammed on Facebook.

From the BBC story:

The case sent shockwaves through Sri Lanka, spurring diplomatic efforts to seek clemency

Saudi Arabia’s Supreme Court has set aside the death sentence handed to a Sri Lankan migrant worker over a comment he made on Facebook, Colombo’s Deputy Foreign Minister Arun Hemachandra said.

Anojan Sivarasa, 27, was sentenced to death in September after a Saudi appellate court convicted him of blasphemy against Islam and the Prophet Muhammad over his comment.

The case sent shockwaves through Sri Lanka, spurring diplomatic efforts to seek clemency.

Saudi Arabia’s top court set aside the sentence on Wednesday, Hemachandra said in a post on Facebook, where he thanked the authorities and legal teams of both nations for their efforts.

In late June, footage of a young Muslim man kicking a dog following Hindu pilgrims circulated widely on social media, triggering religious arguments online.

During the exchange, a user posted derogatory remarks about a Hindu deity, leading Sivarasa to respond in Tamil insulting the Prophet Muhammad.

Although Sivarasa promptly deleted the comment and posted an apology video, a screenshot of it was brought to the attention of his employer and Saudi officials, leading to his arrest in July.

It is not clear if there will be further legal proceedings or whether Sivarasa will remain in detention, and for how long. He was initially sentenced to five years in prison as well as a fine of three million Saudi riyals ($0.8m; £0.6m) by the Al-Ahsa Criminal Court.

The death sentence came later, but is now revoked. It’s still ridiculous and barbaric treatment for insulting religion. I know of no other faith that would do something like this.

Oh, and the artist said this in his note to Patrons:

In other news, there’s a new Jesus & Mo book out! It’s a “best of” collection called The Chosen Ones – a selection of about 150 from 2005-2026. It would be a lovely Xmas present for the infidel in your life!

Also, if you wish to support J&M’s continued existence, please consider becoming a Patron. Just a dollar or two a month makes a difference.

Thanks for subscribing. See you next week!

Author, Jesus & Mo

Wednesday: Hili dialogue

October 14, 2026 • 6:45 am

Welcome to a Hump Day (“Ziua Cocoașei” in Romanian): Wednesday, October 14, 2026, and National Dessert Day, celebrating everyone’s favorite course. Here’s a fine treat of Hawaiian “shave ice” with matcha ice cream, sweet red beans, and vanilla ice cream on top and mochi on the side.  Shave ice hasn’t made it to the mainland yet, but I remember that Obama loves it:

It’s also National Chocolate-Covered Insect Day, National Fossil Day. and National Bring Your Teddy Bear to Work and School Day. I have Toasty, who’s always here with me:

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the October 14 Wikipedia page.

Hili will be short today as I went to the eye doctor yesterday, consuming the time I usually use to prepare this feature. Bear with me (this could be the title of the photo above); I do my best.

Da Nooz:

*During an operation yesterday to remove a nodule from his lung, Pope Leo was diagnosed with lung cancer, and a portion of his lung was removed. He’s only 71–young for a Pope:

Pope Leo was diagnosed with lung cancer on Tuesday, and a lower lobe of his right lung was removed during surgery, ​the Vatican said in a statement.

It said an examination of a nodule during the operation had confirmed a diagnosis of ​lung adenocarcinoma. It said cancer had been “suspected by preoperative tests.”

The surgery itself lasted approximately 90 minutes, and the pope, 71, was in the operating room for about 3 hours. “The surgery was successful, and there were no complications,” the statement said.

The statement did not say whether the pope would undergo further treatment. A Vatican spokesman said that the statement spoke for itself.

On Wednesday, the Vatican issued a statement saying that the pope “had a restful night.”

Lung adenocarcinoma is a common form of lung cancer. Survival rates for it vary greatly depending on the stage of the cancer and a patient’s overall health.

The information released about Leo thus far seems to indicate he has early-stage lung cancer, which is typically treated with surgery and tends to have a very high survival rate, said Dr. Sudish Murthy, a thoracic surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic.

The surgery was performed at a hospital in Rome, the Policlinico A. Gemelli. The Vatican had said previously that Leo was expected to spend about a week recovering in the hospital after the surgery and that all audiences with him would be canceled until Oct. 20.

An oncologist interviewed on NBC News last night said that if the cancer was stage 1, no other treatment would ensue, but if it were 2 or 3, he would have other treatment: presumably radiation or chemotherapy. I don’t think it was stage 4, which has a dire prognosis.

*The embattled U.S. Ambassador to Greece, Kimberley Gilfoyle, has resigned since the pressure on her was too great.

Kimberly Guilfoyle resigned as the U.S. ambassador to Greece on Tuesday after the White House asked her to do so following a string of damaging reports, including that she had asked a Republican donor to pay off her credit card.

In response to a question from a reporter about Ms. Guilfoyle’s status, President Trump’s new press secretary, Katie Zacharia, said: “We have asked Ambassador Guilfoyle to resign. She has been a wonderful asset to the team, and we wish her well.”

Mr. Trump said Tuesday that Ms. Guilfoyle “was doing a good job” but that he “didn’t like what I read.” The president also downplayed his connection to Ms. Guilfoyle, who was once engaged to his oldest son, Donald Trump Jr.

“She wasn’t a member of my family,” he told reporters before leaving the White House for Alaska. “She, I guess, dated my son a long time ago.”

In a lengthy post on social media, Ms. Guilfoyle said that her time as ambassador was “coming to an end” and that she planned to “vigorously defend my name, my reputation, and my integrity.”

“I will not allow false accusations to define my decades of public service,” she wrote.

A donor, Eric Deters, first told The Wall Street Journal that Ms. Guilfoyle asked him to wire her $100,000 to pay off her American Express card just before her Senate confirmation hearing in July 2025. According to messages Mr. Deters provided to The New York Times, Ms. Guilfoyle promised to serve as his “ride or die in Trump world” if he sent her the money.

Ms. Guilfoyle was one of the first ambassadors to be nominated in the president’s second term. In Greece, she has been a highly visible ambassador, appearing on the cover of Vogue Greece and at parties around Athens. Ms. Guilfoyle told The Times last year that her active social life demonstrated her commitment to the job.

What Gilfoyle did was bribery, plain and simple: “I’ll put in a good word for him with Trump if you give me the money.” Now whether an ambassador to Greece can have a lot of influence with the President is dubious, but nobody should be allowed to serve after saying something like that. And she’s not particularly qualified, either, though lots of ambassadorships are offered merely as political plums.

*The WSJ urges Trump to throw in his lot with the Saudis in attacking the Houthis.

Missile and drone attacks by Yemen’s Houthis over the weekend have Saudi Arabia reeling. The skies over Riyadh emptied after a Saturday strike on the international airport killed 13 and injured more than 300, and a Sunday attack killed one more. Now comes the test for U.S. policy.

Asked Saturday about joining Saudi strikes against the Houthis, President Trump said, “We may. We’re going to look at it.” Yet the last thing he seems to want before midterm elections is a military escalation. That hesitation may be what Iran and its Houthi militia proxies, whom it arms and finances, are counting on.

The U.S. could let the Saudis fend for themselves against the Iranian axis, but at great strategic cost. The region is watching what Washington will do when the cornerstone of its Gulf alliance system is under attack.

This doesn’t require a blank check for Riyadh, and U.S. interceptor shortages constrain what Mr. Trump can provide on defense. But this fight won’t be won on defense, continuing to play whack-a-mole with Houthi projectiles. That points to offense, where munitions stocks are healthier and U.S. help is needed to take out Houthi surface-to-air missiles.

Real-time U.S. intelligence support is more discreet but equally important. The Saudi-backed Yemeni government offensive already has the Houthis under pressure along Yemen’s western coast and Red Sea corridor, but it’s moving slowly.

The U.S. can also continue its diplomacy to rally a regional anti-Houthi coalition, including Israel and the United Arab Emirates. The Houthis threaten the region and international shipping, not only Saudi Arabia, and they operate as part of a larger Iranian strategy. Though Houthi-Saudi conflict predates the current Iran war, the war has put Saudi Arabia in the line of fire. Iran may believe it has identified the weak link in the U.S. regional alliance.

. . . . It didn’t have to be this way. The original Western error was to restrain the Saudi-Yemeni alliance when it had the Houthis on defense. Amid international humanitarian concerns over civilian casualties, a chance to defeat the Iranian proxy was missed in 2018 and 2019. In February 2021 the new Biden Administration cut off all support—arms, intelligence and logistics—for the anti-Houthi offensive.

To accommodate Iranian power, Joe Biden even lifted the Houthis’ terror designation. This for a group whose chant is: “God is the Greatest, Death to America, Death to Israel, Curse be upon the Jews, Victory to Islam.” The Saudis then cut a deal to appease the Houthis, including funneling money to grease the peace. As with Qatari money in Gaza, it didn’t work. The Houthis used the reprieve to rearm.

As with Hamas, there is no diplomatic way to eliminate the Houthis threat. Yes, diplomacy may be needed to forge an anti-Houthi alliance, but, like all Islamist Iranian proxy groups, there is no solution but military engagement.  And “rallying a regional anti-Houthi coalition” means putting together a plan of military strikes.  It’s less than two months until the midterms, but the Houthis can do a lot of damage to Saudi Arabia before then.

*Over at the Free Press, Tony Blair takes on the antisemitic Greens: “Britain’s fastest-growing party has an anti-Jewish problem.”

This weekend, the Green Party of England and Wales crossed a line. A dangerous line. One that it is unacceptable to cross. It passed a resolution which effectively denounced the State of Israel’s right to exist.

By a vote of 1,022 to 813, the party passed a motion entitled “Zionism Is Racism,” which commits the party to a single Palestinian state covering all of historic Palestine—which is to say, to a world in which Israel, the state which contains the largest population of Jews on Earth, does not exist.

To understand the full depth of this shift, consider what the motion says. It defines Zionism not as the movement for Jewish self-determination in the historic Jewish homeland, but as an ideology demanding “an ethnonationalist Jewish State in historic Palestine to the exclusion and/or domination of the non-Jewish population.” It instructs that Zionism will be “treated as any other form of racism” and rejects any attempt “to equate anti-Zionism with antisemitism.”

Since at least two-thirds of British Jews call themselves Zionists, the party has, in effect, branded the majority of the country’s Jews racists, while declaring that doing so cannot be antisemitic.

. . .There are those in my party, Labour, who might be tempted by the so-called progressive Red-Green coalition—an alliance between Labour and the Greens to unite the British left. But this vote should serve as a warning of the dangers such an alliance would bring.

Zionism was never a movement started in support of Jewish supremacy. It started because Jewish people found that the original preferred strategy of assimilation was impossible. Throughout the centuries Jews in Europe and elsewhere were subject to persecution. Sometimes treated less badly than at other times, but never treated equally. So in the late 19th century, the movement began for a Jewish homeland. The terrors of the Holocaust gave it unstoppable force. But it was never, and has never been, incompatible with self-determination for the Palestinians.

“Zionism is racism” is not fresh moral thinking about the Middle East. In 1975, the Soviet bloc and its Arab allies pursued United Nations Resolution 3379, which declared Zionism a “form of racism and racial discrimination.” Britain voted against the resolution in 1975 and for its revocation in 1991. Now, a Soviet propaganda campaign, which should have died with the Cold War, is being given a second life in 21st-century Britain.

. . .This weekend’s motion overturns decades of international consensus. It rejects the two-state solution. With it goes the architecture of every attempt to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict since 1947, when the UN General Assembly first voted for a Jewish state alongside an Arab one. In this, the party is unashamedly aligning itself with the most extreme elements of Middle East politics.

Those of us working, through the Board of Peace, to ensure that the bloodshed of October 7 is never repeated, and that Gaza has a different and better future, understand very well the legitimate global concern about Gaza. We have a plan—the only viable plan on offer—whose framework is designed to create a new Gaza in which Israel’s security is protected and the Palestinians in Gaza have the chance of a different and better future. And we know that only by freeing Gaza from the control of Hamas, so long as it remains a group committed to the destruction of Israel by violence, can the Palestinians of Gaza have a chance at freedom.

This is very refreshing coming from a Labour Party man, though he’s misguided about the two-state solution. But Blair is right about freeing Gaza from the control of Hamas.  He should realize that that will never be effectd by the “Board of Peace”, but only through military compulsion.  I’d be delighted if Hamas laid down its weapons and disbanded, but can’t imagine the latter happening without the former—or ever. Hamas without weapons is like a lioness without teeth.

The black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes), brought back from near extinction and always precarious, is in more trouble now, as the founding population seems to have largely disappeared.  A plague is ravaging the species as well as its main prey, prairie dgs. (“Sylvatic plague” is caused by the same bacterium that produces bubonic plague, but this strain appears to affect rodents and mustelids, though its effect on ferrets is largely by killing their prey, not the ferrets themselves.)

Wyoming wildlife managers are reporting that no black-footed ferrets are being detected in the cradle of the species’ conservation: the Absaroka Range foothills outside of Meeteetse, where the ferrets were saved after presumed extinction in the 1980s.

A tough combination of plague and drought — both big issues for the embattled western species — are suspected causes of a population collapse in the Meeteetse area, where wildlife managers returned ferrets to the wild in 2016 after a three-decade-long absence. It’s not assured that the reintroduced population is completely gone, but it’s not looking promising, Wyoming Game and Fish Department small carnivore biologist Andy Gygli said.

“We spent a couple hundred hours of effort surveying 4,000 to 5,000 acres of the Meeteetse reintroduction area,” Gygli said. “We didn’t see any ferrets.”

Wyoming wildlife managers are reporting that no black-footed ferrets are being detected in the cradle of the species’ conservation: the Absaroka Range foothills outside of Meeteetse, where the ferrets were saved after presumed extinction in the 1980s.

A tough combination of plague and drought — both big issues for the embattled western species — are suspected causes of a population collapse in the Meeteetse area, where wildlife managers returned ferrets to the wild in 2016 after a three-decade-long absence. It’s not assured that the reintroduced population is completely gone, but it’s not looking promising, Wyoming Game and Fish Department small carnivore biologist Andy Gygli said.

“We spent a couple hundred hours of effort surveying 4,000 to 5,000 acres of the Meeteetse reintroduction area,” Gygli said. “We didn’t see any ferrets.”

. . .“We’ve heard a lot about deer, elk, pronghorn and cattle having hard times,” Gygli said. “It’s the same with our other herbivores. Prairie dogs also have to eat, and lack of (vegetation) coverage can result in low recruitment, which can result in downstream effects.”

For ferrets, those downstream drought effects are severe. They, too, haven’t had enough to eat. Indirectly, drought caused the numbers of rare mustelids in the world’s largest wild black-footed ferret population, in South Dakota’s Conata Basin/Badlands, to plummet from 250 to 70 animals between 2024 and 2025, according to biologist and ferret expert Travis Livieri, who studies that population.

“In my 30 years of doing this, I’ve never seen (drought) this bad, where prairie dogs failed to reproduce at a high rate,” Livieri said. “The prairie dogs don’t do well, the ferrets won’t do well.”

. . .There are some skeptics that Meeteetse will ever be home to self-sustaining ferrets. Oakleaf, the Game and Fish retiree, says he understands the desire to restore the historically significant population, but he worries that it’s just not the right place — it’s too small and has too much plague, he said.

“Everybody involved feels obligated to put them back in Meeteetse.” Oakleaf said, “But, man, I don’t know how you do it. It just hasn’t shown over the years that it could support a ferret population.”

For now, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department is not giving up.

“This is a place that we’re going to continue to work on,” Gygli said. “It’s the place where ferrets persisted.”

There are about 500 of these ferrets left in the wild and around 300 in captivity. Here’s a photo from Wikipedia:

USFWS Mountain Prairie, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili has an odiferous premonition:

Hili: There’s something scary over there.
Andrzej: I don’t see anything threatening.
Hili: Neither do I, but I don’t like the smell.

In Polish:

Hili: Tam coś straszy.
Ja: Nie widzę niczego groźnego.
Hili: Ja też nie, ale zapach mi się nie podoba.

*******************

From Meow Incorporated:

From CinEmma:

From Give Me a Sign 2.0:

From Masih: Here’s the funeral announcement for a woman murdered by her brother in an “honor killing” in Iran. The killer is listed among the mourners and organizers, with the honorific “esteeemed”:

The Number Ten Cat is recovering from a removal of a cyst, and his fur is growing back. But he’s still cracking jokes:

From Luana. The riots in France are spreading, and Luana thinks that immigrants are one of the causes:

Two from my feed. First, Hasan Piker cooks himself in his fancy Mao suit. Did he really say he had to “slope himself out”, or am I mishearing?

D*gs in flight!

One I reposted from The Auschwitz Memorial:

Two from Dr. Cobb. We’ve seen the first spider before, but not, I think, like this:

Here's a spider 🕷️ using a web 🕸️ like Spider-Man: it creates a thin line of web that can be used to yank something in towards you at VERY high speed!doi.org/10.1016/j.cu… 🧪Hat tip to @brembs.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy

— Zen Faulkes (@doctorzen.net) 2026-10-13T12:53:37.415Z

A cute Halloween runner duck:

Runner duckling Boot on pumpkin inspection duties

— Chris and his farmily of forever farm friends (@caenhillcc.bsky.social) 2026-10-12T19:59:17.519Z

There are many good doo-wop songs from the early days of rock, but this one’s my favorite: “So Much in Love” sung by the Tymes and released in 1963.  It’s street-corner music of the highest order, complete with background wailing and great harmony. Note that it begins with the sound of seagulls at the shore. There’s at least one other pop song that begins that way; can you name it?

Another journal drinks the Kool-Aid

October 13, 2026 • 9:45 am

The American Journal of Biological Anthropology was formerly The American Journal of Physical Anthropology but, according to reader who sent me this link, the name changed, presumably to reflect the changing nature of the field. I quote:

It is the flagship journal of the AABA and it used to be rigorous science only.  The latest special issue is filled with this nonscientific nonsense.  “Queering Biological Anthropology: uses of LGBTQIA+ knowledge and queer feminism in research”. It’s ridiculous and embarrassing.
You can see the table of contents at the last link above. Yes, a compendium of biological anthropology on sex and gender could potentially contribute to human understand of our personas and social interactions, but this one ain’t it.  Here are a few select articles, and I’ll give a quote or two from each (click on the headline to read the free bits; excerpts are indented, and bolding is mine).

Here’s the phenomenon:

Callitrichids are equally notable as chimeras, a term referring to organisms whose cells are derived from two or more distinct zygotic lineages (Anderson et al. 1951). Among mammals, small numbers of chimeric cells (i.e., “microchimerism”) are thought to be present in all placental species (Gammill and Harrington 2017; Nelson 2012). In callitrichids, however, chimerism routinely occurs on a much larger scale. Within this taxon, chimerism occurs in conjunction with the production of fraternal twins and other multiples, which is the typical birth pattern for all but callimicos (Ah-King and Tullberg 2000; Harris et al. 2014).

That’s interesting, but in the hands of an ideologue the finding allows one to go wild with speculation:

This article demonstrates how queer monster theory can illuminate the cultural boundary-work that stabilizes biological categories of sex and reproduction as well as the kinship claims that often follow. Read as monstrous informants, callitrichid chimeras make visible how “monstrosity” is employed to police these categories in human and nonhuman primates alike, as well as what is at stake when that policing is normalized. When primatology defaults to inherited assumptions about sex and reproduction, it risks not only mischaracterizing its study species but lending scientific authority to the broader cultural machinery of queer monsterization and erasure.

The promises of monsters and monkeys therefore carry epistemic and ethical obligations. Meeting them is, in a sense, a monstrous practice; it requires connections and conversations across subfields and sustained attention to the entanglements of science and sociopolitical dynamics. Yet these obligations can also begin with small methodological choices: specifying the traits being measured rather than using “sex” as a silent binary proxy; defining and justifying what counts as “reproduction” and “fitness” within a given analysis; and acknowledging nonbinary sex and nonreproductive individuals without casting them as aberrant or without value. Practiced in these ways, primatology and biological anthropology can begin to unsettle naturalized bias rather than reproduce it.

In fact, the whole issue is permeated with the view that sex is nonbinary. Here’s another example, one of two article that bemoans the fact that “gender” (presumably how one identifies with respect to sex)

A quote:

Intersectional feminism and queer theories may also be used to challenge sexist and cisgenderist biases that can harm sex- and gender-diverse individuals. Striving to de-center patriarchal ideology, feminist history highlights the shared goals of gender equality and equity. Feminist anthropology, specifically, teaches cultural competence and limits patriarchal biases in forensic casework. A rich understanding of intersectional feminism can help forensic practitioners better understand sex and gender variability. A more feminist forensic anthropology could greatly improve the communal impact of medicolegal practitioners across the U.S. Queer theory aims to critique assumptions related to “atypical” bodies by normalizing the spectrum of human sex and gender diversity. Advocating against biological determinism, integrating queer theories in medicolegal investigations can help ensure that documents and datasets are reflective of individuals’ biological and cultural experiences. Discussions on queering bioarchaeology emerged around the start of the century, with scholars such as Sabrina Agarwal, Pamela Geller, Sandra Hollimon, and Julie Wesp outlining the importance and utility of queer theory and methods in skeletal assessments and conceptualizations of the human body (e.g., Geller 2005, 2008, 2009a, 2009b, 2019; Hollimon 1996, 2001, 2011; Wesp and Agarwal 2017). Failure to recognize both biological and cultural influences on the skeleton risks perpetuating scientism, presentism, and bio-colonialism (Geller 2005, 2009b, 2019; Hollimon 2011). Using queer theory in forensic anthropology can help improve medicolegal case resolution by broadening identification efforts and collaboration with living communities.

Another search for nonbinary sex in skeletons:

This author use sa bogus overestimateion of true intersex individuals, and then, since there are really no data showing what the skeletons of such individuals look like, they simply make predictions. Again, there’s a general denial that there are distinguishable sexes, as well as the usual emphasis on sex-related traits which, of course, we’ve long known are more variable than sex itself. We still have only two types of gametes.

Blackless et al. (2000) have estimated that approx. 1.7%–2.3% of all humans are intersex. Fausto-Sterling (2000a) similarly estimated that intersex people comprise 1.7% of the global population, revised from an earlier estimate of 4% (Fausto-Sterling 1993). If accurate, these estimates indicate that intersex is not rare in population genetics terms (Astorino 2019), since “rare” traits are exhibited by < 1% of individuals in a given population (Hartl et al. 1997; Jobling et al. 2013). Researchers in the social sciences have noted that this frequency estimate is comparable to the global frequency of humans with natural red hair—a trait that is generally not considered “rare” by medical professionals or many cultures (Dreger 1998; Karkazis 2008a; Davis 2015). In other vertebrates, it is unclear how common intersex is; while the frequency of other forms of sex diversity has been more comprehensively studied across higher vertebrate taxa (Ashman et al. 2014; Nemesházi and Bókony 2023), similar data on intersex are not available.

. . . . Given these frequencies, it may be inaccurate to characterize humans as sexually dimorphic (Blackless et al. 2000). Astorino (2019) suggested that humans may be conceptualized not as sexually dimorphic, but as sexually polymorphic. Dunsworth (2020) proposed referring to “sex differences” instead of sexual dimorphism. McLaughlin et al. (2023) argued that sex is multivariate, where many individual traits—each of which may or may not conform to a binary distribution—collectively constitute what is typically considered a single variable. Similarly, Smiley et al. (2024) asserted that individual sex variables each represent different aspects of sex, which may have complex, dynamic relationships with other sex variables, and suggested that researchers operationalize specific, measurable sex variables appropriate for a given study, each of which may be characterized as monomorphic, dimorphic, or multimorphic.

Despite the fact that sex variation has been noted to be complex in humans, sex is still most commonly defined as sexually dimorphic by biological anthropologists and evolutionary biologists.

Bonobos used to rectify the claimed erasure of lesbian and bisexual relationships:

The title of this paper “Just gal pals!” refers to the heteronormative tendency to erase lesbian and bisexual relationships and is a memeified response by the LGBTQ+ community online to such erasure (Warburton 2021). We believe it also encapsulates the way researchers over the decades have described bonobo GG rubbing: Wow look at those two female bonobos (gal pals) and their strong social bond or just two female bonobos (gal pals) reducing tension. Entrenched biases make the alternative—that two female bonobos are having sex—one of the last available explanations that researchers explicitly acknowledge in the scientific literature. This may be why sexual motivations are omitted from hypotheses for the function of GG rubbing (Hohmann and Fruth 2000; 2009; Waller 2016). Similarly, while GG rubbing in female bonobos has been emphasized, male–male sexual behavior in bonobos and other primates is often overlooked. Media portrayals of female–female sexuality in humans are often framed for consumption by the male gaze and/or imply that the women involved are “testing” or “experimenting” while not invalidating a heterosexual identity (Diamond 2005). Thus, female–female sexuality among humans, particularly for bi/pansexual women, is often not viewed as valid, and sexual relationships among women are viewed more favorably than those among men (Worthen 2013; Bettinsoli et al. 2020). As a result, recognition of female–female sexuality in our closest relatives may also be perceived as less directly threatening to patriarchal hegemony in humans.

Now I haven’t read the whole issue, or any article in great detail, as that would cause severe damage to my alimentary canal. Regardless, this issue, for which papers were solicited, appears to be driven not by a search for truth but by a drive to promote “progressive” ideology. Not only do we see the claim that traditional anthropology has caused great harm (see above about erasing lesbian and bisexual relationships), but that these papers will rectify that harm. The science is mission-driven rather than knowledge-driven.

Other harm appears to come from the claim that sex in humans is binary, with misguided biologists like me recognizing that humans have but two types of reproductive apparatus: those designed to produce eggs or sperm. I’ve defended that position assiduously while recognizing that there is a very low frequency (about 1/5000) of true intersex individuals.

Overall, this shows the growing tendency of biological anthropologists to distort science for ideological ends. The claim that there are more than two sexes, or that sex is a continuum, is of course made to buttress the idea that individuals who feel that they’re not of their natal biological sex will be harmed by the sex binary. It is a way of providing consolation to nonbinary people (I’m talking about gender, not sex.) That idea bogus, of course, but it’s these well-meaning but careerist scientists—those who infuse their “findings” with ideology—who do the real damage.

And of course I make no comment about the other papers in the contents that I haven’t looked at.

h/t: Callum