Readers’ wildlife photos

July 26, 2026 • 8:45 am

We are in dire need of wildlife photos, so if you have some good ones, please send them in.

Today we have the sixth and last installment of Ephraim Heller’s photos from his recent trip to Namibia. His captions and IDs are indented, and you can enlarge the photos by clicking on them.

This is the last installment in my series on a May-June 2026 visit to Namibia. Today’s photos were taken inland, at the Ongava/Etosha region (where I photographed rhinos for last week’s installment) and at Nkasa Rupara National Park in the Caprivi Strip.

Most of the animals in this post are well known to readers, but the history of the Caprivi Strip is worth a digression on 19th century colonial competition in Africa. Here is a map (courtesy of WorldAtlas) of present-day Namibia. The Caprivi Strip is the odd extension in the northeast corner of the country that juts out to contact Angola, Botswana, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. It is 30 km wide and 450 km long:

Germany had established the colony of German South West Africa (modern Namibia) in 1884. Germany also had the colony of German East Africa (Tanganyika, the mainland portion of modern-day Tanzania). German Chancellor Leo von Caprivi wanted to establish a trade corridor between the two German colonies on the west and east coasts of Africa, but there was one problem: the British held colonies in between. He came up with the idea that if he could extend German South West Africa’s eastern border to the Zambezi River, there would be a navigable waterway linking the two German colonies.

This ambition led to negotiations with Britain and to the signing of the Heligoland–Zanzibar Treaty in 1890. Britain transferred the Caprivi strip and ceded the North Sea island of Heligoland to Germany. In return, Germany recognized British authority over the Zanzibar islands (now also part of Tanzania) off of Tanganyika.

All of Chancellor Caprivi’s scheming came to naught, however, because the Germans were not aware of a small obstacle to navigation in the Zambezi River known today as Victoria Falls, one of the largest waterfalls in the world (photo courtesy of Wikipedia Commons):

The cunning British, on the other hand, were well aware of the existence of Victoria Falls (David Livingstone having named them in 1855). Perfidious Albion, indeed.  As usual during the Scramble for Africa, the indigenous people were not a consideration in this deal.

Now, on to the animals. I’ll skip descriptions as most species will be familiar to readers:

Wahlberg’s striped skink (Trachylepis wahlbergii) peeking out of the skull of an African buffalo (Syncerus caffer):

Lion (Panthera leo) at sunset:

Black-backed jackals (Lupulella mesomelas) playing at dawn:

Angolan giraffe (Giraffa giraffa angolensis) coming to drink at the Linyanti River:

Shikra (Tachyspiza badia):

Nile monitor (Varanus niloticus):

Rock hyraxes (Procavia capensis):

More from the sunset photo series. A Burchell’s zebra (Equus quagga burchellii):

Red Lechwe (Kobus leche):

Vultures (species unknown):

Sunday: Hili dialogue

July 26, 2026 • 6:45 am

Welcome to the Sabbath for goyische cats: Sunday, July 26, 2026, and National Bagelfest Day. Below I put, as always, a genuine bagel rather than the large, airy bread toruses that pass for bagels in America. This was in Montreal ten years ago. No commentary is needed:

One with a schmear. Notice that the bagel is small and dense.

It’s also Aunts and Uncles Day, National Coffee Milkshake Day, and World Tofu Day. In honor of the first holiday, here are my late uncles Bernie (left) and Mo (right)—my mother’s brothers. They’re all decked out for a round of golf, at the Jewish country club, of course (Jews weren’t allowed to join the regular country club):

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the July 26 Wikipedia page.

I have visitors for much of this week, so posting will be light; perhaps even days without a Hili dialogue. Caturday posts are being eliminated because interest is low.

Da Nooz:

*Breaking news ripped from the headlines: The U.S., prompted by a lack of missiles and Trump’s equivocation, has not attacked Iran in two days.

The war between the United States and Iran remained on pause for a second straight day on Sunday, while the Iranian Foreign Ministry said that there had been some movement in talks between Tehran and mediators over the Strait of Hormuz.

No U.S. strikes on Iran have been reported since Friday, while Iran has similarly held off attacking American allies around the Middle East after about two weeks of skirmishes brought the two countries back to the brink of full-blown war.

President Trump decided last week to put off plans to escalate the U.S. assault on Iran, at least for now, according to U.S. officials. Mr. Trump and his aides were motivated in part by dwindling stockpiles of interceptors to shoot down Iranian missiles, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss operational matters.

Mr. Trump has struggled to decisively end the war on Iran that the United States and Israel started jointly five months ago, even as the global economic toll and number of American casualties have mounted. A cease-fire signed last month effectively collapsed after Iran continued to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, the vital waterway for global oil and gas shipments.

Iran is and will continue to be the main exporter of terrorism in the Middle East—indeed, in the world.  If it’s allowed to retain the power it had to do that, America will have failed completely in our war aims.

*Trump is considering a big escalation in Iran (article archived here). Because of what I wrote about, this may be passé.

President Trump met on Friday with top advisers and senior members of his cabinet to decide whether to intensify the military assault against Iran, according to four people briefed on the discussion.

The meeting took place as Mr. Trump faces a potential inflection point in his approach to Iran, after the collapse of a fragile cease-fire and a memorandum of understanding that was intended to bring the United States and Iran back to the negotiating table for a longer-term denuclearization.

The White House did not divulge whether Mr. Trump determined how to proceed. But the president indicated that the military was ready to carry out heavier assaults if ordered to do so even while leaving open the door to a diplomatic solution.

“Look, we’re locked and loaded,” Mr. Trump told reporters on Friday afternoon. “We’re ready to go, but we’re talking to them, so maybe there will be, maybe there won’t be a tipping point.”

He added: “Maybe they will cry uncle, or maybe they’ll just give up, or maybe they’ll just go into a cave and hide.”

Mr. Trump previewed some of his discussions in an interview with Axios on Thursday, saying: “I am considering a massive attack. Bigger than ever before. I am close to making a decision. We are all set for it.”

He also indicated that the Israelis most likely would not be part of a new escalation, saying there could be “consequences” for them, apparently meaning from Iran. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel is coming to the United States on Monday and plans to meet with Mr. Trump, Mr. Netanyahu’s office announced.

Mr. Trump has insisted that the U.S.-Israeli war in Iran would be a relatively short “excursion,” although it has lasted nearly five months, with no end in sight.

In my view, that last sentence is on the border of news and opinion. Nobody knows how long a war would last when it’s started, and nobody predicted that the Iranian regime would decide to tough it out while inflicting economic damage on the world by controlling the Strait of Hormuz. I have no idea whether Trump will escalate (I’m starting to think he will), nor what route he would take if he did.

*In his new NYT column, “Call the Veep, agent Mulder,” Bret Stephens eviscerates J. D. Vance (archived here).

Somewhere around the two-hour mark in JD Vance’s nearly three-hour podcast interview last week with Joe Rogan, the pair got into a serious conversation about supernatural and extraterrestrial phenomena. By serious, I mean it in the sense that Rogan seemed to take the subject seriously while Vance cynically, or cretinously, or cravenly, or credulously or conspiratorially — or perhaps it’s all of the above — played along with him.

It contained the following insights from the vice president of the United States:

“If we’re talking about an extraterrestrial being that is humanlike, but not human, that contains effectively infinite powers and is torturing human beings, you can call it an alien if you want, but I think there’s a lot of historical precedent to call that a demon.”

And:

“If you’re looking for me to concede the point that there is something different or could be something different between an angel, a demon, a space alien, a supernatural but non-any-of-those-other-things beings, yes, I concede that.”

And:

“I got two-and-a-half more years as V.P., and I swear to you, if there are little green men, like body remains, I’m not going to text you. I’m going to try to smuggle a camera in and get a photo of these things.”

Call the veep, Agent Mulder!

By this point, the two men had already propounded one conspiracy theory — that the Los Angeles mayoral election had been rigged (a claim previously debunked by a Trump-appointed federal prosecutor); followed by Vance’s accusation that Joe Biden’s staff got him to eat ice cream “in the most ridiculous, suggestive way imaginable” (a remarkable way of turning naked mendacity into adolescent prurience into another conspiracy theory); followed by an exchange about eating corn dogs in public (because, you know); followed by an argument about whether the Ten Commandments should be mandated in Texas public schools, in which neither man appeared to be aware that the commandments are not originally Christian.

The truth — that the most influential media figure in America today, with tens of millions of followers on social media, is a jocular bro with an Everyman affect who seems never to have encountered an idiotic or despicable conspiracy theory he isn’t willing to promote (moon-landing denial) or platform (Hitler revisionism). We are a nation that has moved at speed from the realm of fact colored by opinions to a kingdom of delusion infested with fear.

The truth — that the current vice president is by far the worst person ever to hold the office (move over, Aaron Burr, John C. Calhoun and Spiro T. Agnew); that he thinks, probably correctly, that there’s no political downside in today’s Republican Party to talking like a guy who thinks Dan Brown novels are works of nonfiction; and that it’s equally OK for a person who, by his own admission, has access to all U.S. intelligence to tease the possibility of deep-state conspiracies of the sort his political base is likely to believe. The prospect of this callow and sinister opportunist taking the place of the erratic buffoon now governing us may be the single scariest thought in world politics today.

The truth — that Vance’s interview with Rogan (as close as politics gives us to a national cancer diagnosis) was a blip in the news cycle, because crazy today is every day, and our capacity to feel shocked diminishes with every asinine utterance coming from the vice president’s mouth, to say nothing of that of his boss.

The truth is that the demons are here. We elected them.

Ouch!  Well, this is good for the Democrats: there’s plenty of dirt on Vance if he runs for President. But perhaps his acolytes don’t care.

*A WSJ editorial-board op-ed, “Globalizing the intifada in Mamdani’s New York,” rebukes Hizzoner for his “anti-Zionism”:

New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani has been running a campaign to demonize Israel and its supporters for committing “genocide.” He should reconsider after Thursday’s double-stabbing in New York, which included a kippah-wearing Jew attacked after exiting a synagogue.

Police arrested Raul Morales in connection with the stabbings. The mayor said victim and witness statements allege that Mr. Morales yelled “Allahu akbar” while attacking a Jew, Moshe Grunhaus and an Asian, Chok Sung. The NYPD is evaluating if this was a hate crime.

A friend who visited Mr. Grunhaus at the hospital tells us the victim was in the process of moving to Florida, in part due to concerns about crime, antisemitism and Mr. Mamdani. He returned to New York to tie up loose ends and attended synagogue during the fast of Tisha B’Av, when Jews mourn the destruction of the ancient temple in Jerusalem.

Earlier this week Mr. Mamdani taped a video accusing Israel of genocide and deliberate child murder. The next day he wished New York’s Jews a “peaceful” fast, in which “mourners will pause and reflect on the history and resiliency of the Jewish people.” That history is in Jerusalem and the land of Israel, but the mayor calls the Jewish state a “settler-colonial” project.

Thursday’s stabbing would fit comfortably with the Palestinian intifadas that Mr. Mamdani and his allies have been keen to “globalize.” Only after repeatedly excusing that phrase did he say that he would “discourage” it. He now sticks to “genocide,” “apartheid,” child-killing and other accusations to render Israel an enemy of mankind, along with the “Zionists” whose crime is to support its existence.

Before his mayoral run, Mr. Mamdani used “Zionist” as a casual slur. He also told comrades: “We have to make clear that when the boot of the NYPD is on your neck, it’s been laced by the IDF,” Israel’s military.

Mr. Mamdani reacted to Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre of Jews by bashing Israel, not Hamas, and mourning victims on both sides. His wife liked Instagram posts cheering on the Hamas attack. His party, NYC’s Democratic Socialists of America, endorsed a rally by pro-Hamas groups on Oct. 8 in “solidarity with the Palestinian people and their right to resist,” as the DSA put it.

. . .Mr. Mamdani isn’t responsible for Thursday’s stabbing. But he is responsible for promoting a culture of denigration that is all too easy for a fevered mind to hear and conclude that violence against Jews is acceptable. The mayor and his ideological groupies are playing with antisemitic fire.

“When I was growing up,” Rabbi Yosie Levine said Friday, after the attack on a congregant, “the only time we saw security outside my synagogue or my Jewish day school was when the mayor came to speak. The police were there to protect him. Today, every time the mayor speaks, we need the police to protect us.”

What can I say? Mamdani seems far more concerned with denigrating Israel and accusing it of apartheid and genocide than running his city. And the MSM, save for the conservative Wall Street Journal, won’t mention it at all. (That’s of course because they agree with the Mayor.)

*I am opposed to government-run lotteries and to sports betting, which is rapidly taking over the U.S.  Lotteries are simply regressive taxes, and sports betting is a way to get people addicted to gambling, as well as for the government to collect taxes on a profitable enterprise (the government taxes the companies as well as the winnings of successful betters)—companies that are guaranteed to do better than the sports fans. In an essay in The Free Press,The case against sports betting,” Coleman Hughes gives us his take.

Infamous as these offenses are, they became so because they were rare. For most of American history, it has been difficult and risky for a professional athlete to place a major bet on his own games.

But with the legalization of sports betting in most U.S. states—touched off by the Supreme Court’s overturning of a federal ban in 2018—we are now entering a darker era. With online betting legal and frictionless, athletes need only a few seconds on their smartphones in order to place a bet (or better yet, get a friend or family member to do the same). And they need not do anything as noticeable as throw a game. A professional basketball player, for instance, can simply bet on individual elements of their personal statistics line (called a “player prop” bet), and then subtly alter their play without drawing unwanted attention.

The scandals are now coming so frequently that it is hard to keep track of them. Just last Friday, the NFL suspended Arizona Cardinals executive Ryan Gold for allegedly betting on his team’s games. A few weeks prior, former NBA player Malik Beasley was indicted for allegedly manipulating his play in at least four 2024 NBA games in coordination with a group of bettors.

In the age of frictionless online betting on player props, all it really takes to cheat is to coordinate with one trusted friend or family member, tell them that you’re not feeling your best before a game, subtly underperform throughout the game, and then accept in-kind gifts from that person. Sure, the authorities will catch those who do this sloppily. But how exactly will they catch a duo who carries out such a scheme in an intelligent and patient manner?

But Hughes has an argument beyond the cheating argument given above—a view more similar to mine:

But the problem with sports betting is not just its effect on the integrity (both real and perceived) of sports. It’s also the unhealthy temptation it creates for sports fans. For psychologically well-adjusted bettors, it’s an innocent hobby. But for a significant minority, it’s a dangerous vice. One scholarly paper found that the introduction of online sports betting to a U.S. state caused a 12-point decline in average credit scores as well as an increase in “indicators of excessive debt, including bankruptcy filings, debt sent to collections, credit card delinquencies, and auto loan delinquencies.”

. . . And where is that money coming from? It’s what people would normally be saving in retirement accounts or for purchasing a home, worthwhile investments that can better their lives. A new study concludes that “risky bets crowd out positive expected value investments,” and instead drive up household debt, even as betting companies soak up billions in revenue.

What to do? As Hughes recognizes, once the government gets a taste of the money, and fans are used to betting, the cat is out of the bad for good. He proposes a more moderate solution:

So what should be done? Returning to something like the pre-2018 status quo—where sports betting was illegal in every U.S. state (except for Nevada, Oregon, Delaware, and Montana)—would be ideal. But it’s not going to happen. Now that states have a taste for the tax revenue that comes from the $167 billion industry, they are not going to bite the hand that feeds them. In principle Congress could ban it federally, but that is unlikely for much the same reason.

There are, however, more moderate alternatives. The SAFE Bet Act, introduced by Connecticut senator Richard Blumenthal and New York Rep. Paul Tonko, both Democrats, would keep sports betting legal while curbing its excesses. The bill would, among other things, ban in-game betting, advertising that targets minors, and player prop bets. Its main flaw is that it would require bettors to prove that they can afford bets before making them, which would require invasive financial disclosures. But on the whole, it is a decent first draft of the kind of legislation that we need.

I’d still favor a ban on betting, but it ain’t gonna happen.

*The FDA is considering whether to make peptides available to the public by allowing “compounding pharmacies” to make them. (A “compounding pharmacy” makes medicines on site.) The NYT tells us what peptides people want (archived here).  I was interested because I heard on the news yesterday that there’s a peptide for insomnia, but I lost interest after I read about it.

An advisory committee to the Food and Drug Administration convened Thursday to evaluate whether compounding pharmacies should be allowed to produce seven peptides that were previously banned over safety concerns.

Despite being prohibited, some of these peptides have become increasingly popular among consumers who purchase them from longevity clinics, alternative health providers, biohacking influencers and even TikTok. The peptides may be produced in unregulated labs, often in China, and sold as “research grade” compounds.

The F.D.A. is evaluating the peptides for specific uses, like treating ulcerative colitis, insomnia and osteoporosis. But they are marketed and used for many other purposes, which could be permitted if the drugs were cleared.

F.D.A. staff scientists reviewed the research on the peptides and have recommended against clearing the peptides, citing a lack of safety and efficacy data in humans. Here’s what they found.

I’ll give just two:

BPC-157

BPC-157, sometimes referred to as Body Protection Compound or bepecin, is one of the most popular “gray market” peptides.

The F.D.A. is evaluating it to treat ulcerative colitis, and it is also marketed as helping to reduce gastrointestinal inflammation and prevent ulcers. Another common use is to support muscle and joint healing — it is sometimes referred to as the “Wolverine compound,” after the Marvel superhero, especially when taken in combination with another peptide, TB-500.

A few small studies in humans have suggested BPC-157 might have benefits for knee painbladder-related pain or ulcerative colitis symptoms. But these had notable limitations: Two lacked a placebo group, and another was not published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Emideltide

Emideltide, also known as the delta sleep-inducing peptide, is naturally produced in the brain. Levels fluctuate throughout the day, which suggests it is connected to circadian rhythms, and it has been shown to increase deep sleep in animals.

The F.D.A. is considering an emideltide injections for insomnia, narcolepsy and opioid withdrawal. (Scientists think it acts through the opioid system.) It’s also marketed for stress, pain, cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.

There are several human studies of emideltide, most from the 1980s involving intravenous infusions. The research has generally suggested that emideltide helps people with insomnia fall asleep faster and stay asleep longer compared with a placebo. But the studies were very small and had limitations and did not all show a clear benefit.

The human data was even more limited for narcolepsy — just a single case report in one patient.

There are others, but with just as pessimistic a take.  The upshot for all the peptides discussed is that the evidence is very thin, that there are some with side effects that may be serious, and tjat although some of these may eventually be useful, none are yet ready for prime time.

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili and Andrzej have a high-level discussion:

Hili: How would you characterize the consciousness of artificial intelligence?
Andrzej: The determinism of algorithms. Though you shouldn’t take me seriously.

In Polish:

Hili: Jak byś określił świadomość sztucznej inteligencji?
Ja: Determinizm algorytmów. Ale nie traktuj mnie poważnie.

*******************

From Bad Spelling or Grammar on Signs and Notices:

From Stacy:

From Bored Panda, Larry with his mouse. He’s so proud!

From Masih; an Iranian rapper sentenced to death for what would be free speech in America:

From FIRE via Luana; this doesn’t seem to rise to the level of “fighting words,” though the speech was hateful and odious. Click to read full tweet and get link:

Good news! Larry won’t have to put up with a d*g!

From Jeff Maurer. Very clever prof!

One from my feed, a lovely fawn. I’d like to see the adult:

One I reposted from The Auschwitz Memorial:

Two from Dr. Cobb. The first one came with the email note “Truth”:

hard-bo̾il̾e̾d̾Gardner (@kgardner.bsky.social) 2026-07-25T09:53:26.313Z

A hare—and one who takes off very fast when it sees the human:

I’ve been standing stock still in this wood for about 10 minutes while I mess about with a photo on my phone. I look up, notice the shape, and slowly crouch down to filmThis has made me so happy I feel I could cry. It’s as close to magic as I hope to get.

Toby Miller (@tobytram.bsky.social) 2026-07-24T18:37:53.777Z

Caturday felid trifecta: Towser the distillery cat and his mousing record; Operation Cat Drop; cat can groom another to annoy it; and lagniappe

July 25, 2026 • 10:30 am

We have three cat-related items today, and a bit of lagniappe.

From Facebook’s F’d Up Facts (note that the image is AI):

And the information attached to it:

At the Glenturret whiskey distillery in Scotland, there was a cat named Towser. She was a long-haired tortoiseshell. Her job was to keep the place free of mice.  She did her job very well. In fact, she was the best mouser in the world. Over 24 years, she is believed to have killed 28,899 mice. That’s about 3 mice every day for her entire career. The Guinness Book of Records officially recognizes her record. She became a legend in the distillery. A statue was even put up to h…

Here are photos and text about Towser from The Great Cat, a wonderful site.  The text is in a screenshot:

A photo of Towser credited to source at bottom:

The site adds that “even though Towswer had had several successors, none of them have ever been able to match her mousing skills.”

From ScotchWhisky.com,

All hail Towser. In the pantheon of mouse-catching machines, the famous cat from the home of The Famous Grouse reigns supreme, and it’s all about the numbers: almost a quarter of a century on duty at Glenturret, and a frankly mind-boggling 28,899 rodents liquidated.

Towser was a kitten of the ’60s, but seems to have skipped the ‘peace and love’ stuff – and she was still gamely terrorising mice until her death, three weeks short of her 24th birthday, in 1987.

Her longevity is attributed to the addition of a wee dram to her milk every night, although we should say that this is not a form of treatment formally endorsed by the veterinary profession.

If you’ve a calculator handy, you might have worked out that, for Towser to account for 28,899 mice over a 24-year period, she’d have had to kill three or four every day. That’s quite a vermin problem.

The story behind the figures is simple: a team from The Guinness Book of Records observed Towser’s activities for a few days, totted up the corpses and extrapolated the total from there. Not exactly scientific.

But let’s not allow such mundane concerns detract from the legend of Towser; a legend that lives on, both in the form of a statue at Glenturret distillery and, earlier this year, in a distillery bottling named after the mouser supreme.

You can see the official Guinness record here. Towser puts Larry to shame!

**********************

Here’s a video I found on Facebook. It’s basically true (see below), describing a parachute drop of cats into Borneo to control rodents where the native cats may have been exterminated by application of DDT.

The Wikipedia article on “Operation Cat Drop” is here, and here’s a bit of it:

Operation Cat Drop is the name given to the delivery of cats, equipment and supplies by the United Kingdom’s Royal Air Force to remote regions of the then-British colony of Sarawak (today part of Malaysia), on the island of Borneo in 1960. The cats were flown out of Singapore and delivered in crates dropped by parachutes as part of a broader program of supplying cats to curb an infestation of rats. The operation was reported as a “success” at the time.  Newspaper reports published soon after the operation reference only 23 cats being used. Some unreliable later accounts of the event claim that as many as 14,000 cats were used, but this figure is apocryphal.  An additional source references a “recruitment” drive for 30 cats a few days prior to Operation Cat Drop.

Insecticides including dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) were widely used during the 1950s, including in Borneo, as a malaria control measure. The insecticides were intended to kill malaria-carrying mosquitoes before they could pass the disease onto humans.

At the time of the cat drop in 1960, newspaper reports indicate that a district in Sarawak was suffering from an infestation of rats, which were destroying crops. It has been suggested that this rat infestation was the result of many of the existing local cats dying due to the use of DDT or other insecticides, and the rat population subsequently increasing as it faced reduced predation from cats. While it has been claimed that these cat deaths resulted from biomagnification of DDT – the cats eating other creatures such as lizards or cockroaches that had in turn been exposed to DDT – this has not been confirmed. Deaths of cats may have been caused by direct exposure to DDT sprayed in dwellings, as opposed to biomagnification.[4]

A nine-minute video about the operation, with pictures and video supplied by AI.

Text for the video is here.  And Wikipedia notes the unintended consequences of spraying DDT to control mosquitoes and the malaria they carried. Note that the video gives another but less likely story involving the proliferation of geckos or, alternatively, of caterpillars.

***********************

Finally, a new NYT article dispelling another bit of cat-related “wisdom”: that cats groom each other as a form of friendship and bonding. Not always true! You can read the article here by clicking below, or find it archived here. 

An excerpt:

Let’s just say cats have a reputation — of being standoffish, manipulative, maybe even jerks. Here’s more corroborating evidence: Scientists are beginning to think that even seemingly innocent cat behavior — grooming another cat — might not always be nice.

The licking can be a method of subtle torment, according to new research published in the journal Applied Animal Behavior Science.

Mutual grooming, called allogrooming, is widespread in the animal kingdom and found in primates, birds, horses and even insects. The grooming is typically focused on parts of the body that are difficult for an animal to reach on its own, like its back and neck, making the behavior an act of kindness that supports social bonding and wins friends.

Like primates that pick lice from each other’s backs, cats that lick each other have also been considered an indicator of social bonding. “So far, mutual grooming in cats has been categorized as affiliative, or ‘friendly,’ cat behavior,” said Noema Gajdos Kmecova, a cat behavioral scientist at Ghent University and an author of the new study.

Or so we thought.

Morgane Van Belle, another cat behavioral scientist at Ghent University and the study’s lead author, was observing her own cats, Fabio and Giovanni, interacting over a favorite napping spot in the sun and noticed something.

“I saw these weird grooming patterns in my own cats where I thought, This is not super friendly at all,” she said. “Sometimes one cat would lay on the blanket near the window and the other cat would come up and start licking it — but in an annoying way.” The interaction would induce the licked cat to get up and forfeit the sunny spot, she said.

Reader Divy told me she noticed eactly this with her two cats Jango and Boba.  A bit more:

To check whether this behavior was more widespread, Ms. Van Belle and her colleagues looked at 53 households across Europe with two or more cats. After telling the pet owners what to look for, the researchers had them submit videos of their cats’ interactions. The scientists then randomly selected a submission from each participant and used statistical analyses to tease apart the hidden nuance in cat-licking behavior.

“It became immediately clear from the analysis that mutual grooming does not mean the same thing in all contexts,” Ms. Van Belle said.

The results revealed two things. The first was consistent with typical grooming behavior: The cats licked each other on the head, neck or ears. In these videos, the cats were much more likely to mimic each other’s body postures, either cuddling together or sitting next to one another before and after the grooming. The licks were clearly friendly gestures.

The other side of the cat-licking coin revealed something more in line with bullying. A subset of the videos showed that licking often preceded conflict. These interactions were defined by differing body postures, where one cat might stand and lick the other sitting cat. The aggressive licks were followed by signs of stress in the licked cat, including staring, yowling, rotating the ears, licking the lips or swiping at the other cat. The results were inconsistent with the prior conception of cat allogrooming.

“Based on our findings, allogrooming is associated with at least two contexts — not only social bonding, but also social tension,” Ms. Kmecova said.

 

***********************

 

Lagniappe:  First, the cat with the world’s longest tail:
Another video of Puggsley Addams:

 

More lagniappe: Kitten rescue (h/t Bill):

Marco Rubio, the DSA, and Communism

July 25, 2026 • 9:15 am

Here’s a 2½-minute video of Secretary of State Marco Rubio talking about socialism, communism, and his vision of America. It’s a bit Ayn Rand-ish, and I ignored the bit about God. (I don’t know the narrator, but it appears to be a “media personality” named Jillian Michaels, a woman of conservative views.

Rubio is speaking about “radical leftism” and its goal of “social justice” that, he thinks, is really acting out a mindset of “poisonous resentment cloaked in the language of equality and justice and liberation. . . “.

Have a listen and tell me that part of this doesn’t resonate with you; and forget it’s Marco Rubio speaking and just listen to the message. Of course I’ll get labeled an “alt-righter” for posting this, but I don’t care. I sent the video to several of my center-left friends, and in general they liked it (except for the God part).

Duckling photo and videos

July 25, 2026 • 8:00 am

It’s Saturday, and besides the Caturday felid post (coming up) we have a photo and three videos of Miss Duck and her babies having a postprandial rest on the rockes. This is the first weekiversity of their hatching, as they must have hatched last Saturday and made their way to Botany Pond in the morning. All four babies are doing well, and my hopes for their long-term survival and fledging have risen.

It’s typical for ducks, after a hearty feed, to find a quiet place to sleep.  Miss Duck and her Brood of Four like to rest on a rock at the north end of the pond, with Miss Duck taking a position on the ledge above to watch and guard the brood. First, a photo:

And three short (one-minute) videos of the ducklings resting.  “Rest” is hardly the word, for although they sleep, they also move around, stretch, wake up to have a drink of water, and flap their tiny wings.  Here’s a view of the whole scene”

A closeup of the resting brood. Notice the black feetsies extending out, the scratching and preening, and the nictitating membranes closing when they sleep.

Here they’re more or less sound asleep, and you can measure their breathing rate (I counted 32 breaths in 30 second for the duck in the foreground).  Notice the leg stretch 17 seconds in and a double leg stretch at 42 seconds.

I find watching sleeping ducks very restful, and could do it for hours (I often watch for the one hour that their naps usually last, both to relax and to prevent people from interrupting their nap).

Oh, and a first yesterday: I kissed a squirrel! They are now so tame they climb all over me to get a nut, whether or not I have nuts with me.  One of them, “Skinnytail”, crawls all over my body, climbing up my leg and sometimes perching on my shoulder. Yesterday he sniffed my ear and I could hear him breathe, and when his back was by my mouth, I kissed it to see if I could. This is a first! (Yes, you’ll think me crazy, but I don’t care.)

Saturday: Hili dialogue

July 25, 2026 • 6:45 am

Welcome to shabbos for Jewish cats: it’s CaturSaturday, July 25, 2025, and also National Day of the Cowboy.  Here’s a photo I took on a fly-collecting trip to Death Valley:  a rare Jewish cowboy once on display at the Eastern California Museum in Independence, CA. The last time I went, the photo was gone and nobody knew about it or even remembered it. I’d kill to have it. He looks more like a yeshiva bochur than a cowboy.

And there’s a feature-length documentary on the subject, which I haven’t seen:

It’s also Culinarians Day, National Hot Fudge Sundae Day, and National Wine and Cheese Day.

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the July 25 Wikipedia page.

I will have visitors for much of next week so posting will be light. Bear with me; I do my best.

Da Nooz:

*Over at It’s Noon in Israel, Amit Segal describes “Three options for escalation” of the war with Iran. Segal thinks that the higher alert levels of the Israeli military, the new involvement of the Houthis, and Trump’s own words bespeak a coming escalation of the war.  Segal gives three possibilities for how the escalation will take place—three target strategies:

The first is Iran’s energy infrastructure—the operation that was on the table before Trump declared a ceasefire. Israel had begun pursuing it during Operation Roaring Lion until Trump reportedly pulled the brakes, under pressure from Gulf states with a well-founded fear for their own energy industries. The target set is narrow and thoroughly understood. Kharg Island handles the overwhelming majority of Iranian crude exports; a few missiles in the right place and Tehran has no way to sell its oil. Choose this option and the Iranians are left cash-strapped and reeling—and overwhelmingly likely to retaliate against regional energy infrastructure, and perhaps against the desalination plants the Gulf depends on for its water.

The second is direct action against the nuclear program itself. That could mean targeting senior figures, seizing the enriched uranium, or some other step aimed at the core of the program. Pickaxe Mountain would likely be the primary target. The site is buried deep enough that it is widely assessed to lie beyond the reach of bunker busters, which is why “seizing” rather than “destroying” keeps surfacing in the discussion. The Iranian response to an attack on their nuclear facilities would be severe as well, though significantly less severe than an oil crisis.

The third is the Strait of Hormuz: a major offensive against the Iranian capabilities surrounding it—anti-ship missile batteries, the IRGC Navy’s fast-attack craft and mine stocks, and coastal radar and drone sites. Throughout the war, it was barely on Israel’s radar. It is now perhaps the single most important question in the global economy. But even such an operation still won’t open the strait. All it takes is one IRGC operator left alive with a drone or two to send war-risk premiums through the roof and shipping companies in the opposite direction. Regardless, Trump may simply declare the strait open and call it a day, with the best-case scen

What’s interesting is that some of these operations don’t require Israel’s involvement at all. Trump said so explicitly: “We don’t need anybody.” He also teased the opposite possibility, saying Israel “would join in two minutes if I ask them to,” and that there would be consequences if it did. Could the conflict intensify dramatically elsewhere while Israel largely stays out of it? At first glance, that seems unlikely. Israel is, after all, only the Little Satan. But even the Little Satan is still Satan.

On the other hand, the past few weeks have produced some confusion among the Israeli population. There are missiles and drones flying across the region, and they aren’t the target? While Kuwaiti vacation plans have been entirely put on hold, Israelis are still flying back and forth on a daily basis. It defies the historical pattern entirely. Israel has become a place of quiet in the middle of a hurricane sweeping across the Middle East.

Still, whether it remains so depends entirely on Trump. He has a ticking clock in the form of the midterm elections. As this war continues to plunge in popularity, Trump appears desperate to wrap it up, though I would caution the president that the only thing less popular than continuing an unpopular war is losing an unpopular war.

I’m not sure that if Trump “loses” the war he’d get more unpopular, as much of the American populace just wants gas prices to go down. And if Iran and Yemen keep blocking transit of oil, that won’t happen. Based on Trump’s verbiate, the second option seems the most likely, followed by the third. Infrastructure destruction would be less popular because the American people don’t like it, and some of it is a war crime. I am not a pundit, but one thing seems likely to me: Trump will escalate the war before he ratchets back.

*I can’t help but think that this NYT article, called “‘We’re trapped in hell’: Iranians say that life is put on hold by months of war” (article archived here), is meant not just as news, but also as part of the NYT’s regular criticism of our war with Iran. (The subtitle is “Devastated by cycles of violence and economic crisis, many are giving up on work and their futures as the United States batters Iran again.”)

Planning for the future seems an absurd luxury when impoverished friends can afford to buy rice only by the cup and when the United States and Iran are trading strikes on military sites, ports and water desalination plants around the region.

For more than a year, Iranians have been trapped in a constant cycle of airstrikes, domestic security crackdowns and economic devastation. A short-lived cease-fire reached last month with the United States brought some respite from falling bombs, though not from the plummeting economy.

The unraveling of the agreement in recent weeks tipped the country back into war. Many Iranians have been left feeling that their lives are on hold or are no longer their own.

. . .This cycle of crisis has plagued Iranians since the 12-day U.S.-Israeli war that battered the country in June last year. In its wake, the government placed the country under a monthslong internet blackout, citing national security concerns. That sent the already foundering economy into a nosedive.

Then, a currency crisis in December set off antigovernment protests that grew into a nationwide movement. Those were crushed in January in a crackdown fiercer than any Iran had experienced in decades, leaving thousands dead and the country bitterly divided.

Weeks later, Mr. Trump and Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, announced their war against Iran, describing it as a once-in-a-generation chance to topple the country’s authoritarian rulers. American and Israeli warplanes pummeled Iran, destroying infrastructure and killing the supreme leader and thousands of civilians. But the country’s theocratic rule remained intact, emboldened by its survival.

Asal, a 20-year-old shopkeeper in a town near Tehran, was among the thousands who took part in the protests in January. Breaking into tears as she described the arrest and torture she said she and her friends experienced, Asal said she had once hoped the U.S.-Israeli intervention would help bring down the regime.

“Trump told us he wanted to save us, but that wasn’t true,” she said. “Whatever happens in the future doesn’t matter to me anymore.”

. . .Loyalists to the Islamic republic camp out nightly on the streets of most cities, demanding that the government pursue war instead of peace and fraying the nerves of those Iranians desperate for the crisis to end.

“Things have become so bad that everyone has completely lost it,” said Mohsen, a business owner in the central city of Isfahan. “We’re trapped in hell, and there’s no saving us.”

“I have no control over my life anymore,” Behnam said. “Our fate is in the hands of those who don’t think about ordinary people.”

The NYT clearly wants this war over, and it wants it over with Trump looking like the loser (i.e., no nuclear deal, which means “worse than Obama”, and with Israel, which the NYT detests, also looking like a loser.  In fact, it also seems that the NYT is siding with supporters of the Iranian regime, though at least it mentions that the regime is oppressing many and has killed thousands (more than 30,000, it’s reported).  The NYT has been captured by progressives, amply represented among their young employees.

*Yesterday the Fields Medal—considered the “Nobel Prize” for mathematics, but given only every four years—was awarded to four people.

Two U.S.-based mathematicians from China have won the Fields Medal, considered math’s equivalent of the Nobel Prize, becoming the first Chinese nationals to earn the honor.

The International Mathematical Union awarded its Fields Medal on Thursday at a ceremony in Philadelphia to four people, including Yu Deng and Hong Wang, who both attended Peking University before earning doctorates in the U.S.

Deng, a professor at the University of Chicago, was honored for his work on one of a famous set of 23 problems proposed by German mathematician David Hilbert in 1900, which are considered benchmarks of progress in the study of mathematics, the university said.

Deng and his collaborators solved a problem within broader attempts to mathematically connect equations governing the motion of gases from the smallest to the largest scales, according to the university. An avid player of the ancient board game Go, the 37-year-old was also honored for research that laid the foundations for this breakthrough.

Wang, a professor at New York University and France’s Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques, was recognized for resolving the Kakeya conjecture in three dimensions, a decades-old geometric problem that addresses the shape left behind by a needle moving in multiple directions, NYU said.

The 35-year-old Wang, who briefly pursued architecture during postgraduate studies in France before renewing her focus on math, is the third woman among the 68 people to receive the Fields Medal since it was first awarded in 1936.

The Fields Medal is conferred every four years upon up to four outstanding mathematicians under the age of 40. The other medalists this year were John Pardon of Stony Brook University and Jacob Tsimerman of the University of Toronto.

. . .Pardon was honored for his work in determining “how to count curves on specific shapes in the field of symplectic geometry,” proving a two-decades-old conjecture that posited that two different ways of counting curves were in fact the same, according to Stony Brook.

The award for Tsimerman recognized his work, among other achievements, in helping to prove the André-Oort conjecture, a longstanding problem in geometry, the University of Toronto said. Tsimerman said Thursday he would be starting a role at OpenAI in its safety division.

I’m not sure what, if any, the practical consequences of these discoveries are, but that’s not as important to me as understanding what was actually done. Which I don’t. So be it. The Fields Medal is somewhat endangered in that AI is now solving these longstanding mathematical conundrums faster than humans can—if the humans can even solve them. It’s ironic that Tsimerman is going to work for an AI company.

*As usual, I’ll steal a few items from Nellie Bowles’s news-and-snark column in The Free Press, called this week, “TGIF: Kids doing fireworks.”

→ Mao did nothing wrong: To deliver his special College Democrats of America 2026 Convention speech, progressive celebrity influencer Hasan Piker wore a frustratingly well-tailored Mao Zedong–style suit, buttoned to the top to show he means business

Soon after, a clip of Piker on Twitch praising Mao resurfaced. Referencing his trip to China in November 2025, Piker said, “I got stopped by a cop who thought I was, like, making fun of Mao Zedong, which I never would and never will. Mao Zedong is one of the great leaders of this world, okay? A man who changed the entire universe, the entire planet. Okay? For real, for real. . . . There was a lot of fucking excesses, let’s be real, but the People’s Republic of China would not exist without Mao Zedong.” Anyway, this week Piker called the Great Chinese Famine—which killed tens of millions of people—“a famine due to mismanagement.” Mao’s only crime was basically an accounting error.

The news broke this week about Democratic politicians—including California Rep. Ro Khanna, Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, former Missouri congresswoman and current candidate Cori Bush, and New York congressional candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier—joining a livestream this past March where podcaster Kyle Kulinski compared the U.S. and Israeli governments to Hitler and Mussolini while defending Iran’s funding of groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis. I think at this point we gotta believe these people. When someone wears a Mao suit, you pay attention. On the topic of Mao suits:

→ DSA releases their new platform: The Democratic Socialists of America, fresh off several big wins, have released their platform. And it’s extremely reasonable, normal, and achievable. All it calls for is expanding the House, abolishing the Senate, and giving felons and noncitizens full voting rights. It paints a beautiful vision of the future: “Your retirement is publicly funded. Food, education, energy, medicine, and transportation aren’t for-profit businesses; they are common goods and utilities.” I’m gonna say it: The socialists have become full commies. All food, energy, medicine, and transportation is state-run, full communism.

The New York City DSA co-chair went on TV last week. When he was asked about bodega owners who might be upset over having to compete with new government grocery stores (which won’t have to pay property taxes or rent), here’s what he said: “Maybe they shouldn’t have been in that business in the first place.” Oh, baby, they are heating up! The ponytails are tight for these DSA leaders, and they will tell the bodega owner to consider an alternative career in union-building. Let me cut to the chase: All private industry is evil. All private property is evil. Your bodega? Evil. Personally, I would love to be a communist, but I have access to the internet and have read 30 seconds of Wikipedia about all past communist efforts, including literal lesbian communes. It don’t work, kids. It never does.

→ Everything is Israel vs. Palestine, apparently: “Was Spain vs. Argentina a proxy for Palestine vs. Israel?” asks the interview description for the World Cup postgame live chat between Mehdi Hasan and Javier Bardem on Hasan’s far-left news site Zeteo. You’ll be shocked to hear Mehdi’s position: It was indeed! Spain is Palestine, by the way. Spain, the most ruthless colonizing power. When you’re so obsessed with Jews that it becomes your entire animating life force, you can only see any conflict—even a soccer game—through the prism of who’s the Jew.

In other news: Sixty percent of registered voters aged 18–24 support Hamas over Israel, according to the July Harvard CAPS-Harris poll. Just 40 percent selected Israel. And just to document where we are, for posterity, here’s a new viral video: “How Israelis Are Colonizing the World,” about how Israelis are colonists no matter where they go, even if they’re traveling to leave Israel because they think it’s a bad, irredeemable place. Quotes: “Israelis aren’t just settlers in Israel. They’re moving and colonizing the world,” the narrator opens, attempting a dramatic Attenborough-inspired nature documentary voice. “From backpacking trails in South and Southeast Asia to quiet European mountain towns, you’ll find Israelis. We’ve mostly seen them take two forms: the war criminals fresh from service, and the liberals fleeing what they claim is a failing democracy.” You’ll find them and We’ve mostly seen them—this is literally how safari guides describe the habits of wild orangutans. “On the surface, they couldn’t seem more different. But watch how they move through the world, and you can see how Zionism produces a particular relationship to land and other people—one that is exploitative and violent and that is not limited to Palestine.” Watch how they move through the world? Are we analyzing their gait? Curiously, because Jews are now described as colonizers in Israel and colonizers if they leave Israel, there is only one correct thing for them to do in this logic. One solution, if you will.

*The Seattle Times reports a new bipartisan federal proposal to kill seals to save salmon (h/t Wayne). Yes, that’s right. Native Americans need their lox, so the seals have to go.

Federal lawmakers are considering whether to expand the government’s authority to kill more sea lions and seals to bolster salmon recovery efforts in the Pacific Northwest.

The region’s critical salmon runs are on life support: Fourteen species and populations of salmon and steelhead trout in Washington are deemed at risk of extinction under the Endangered Species Act. The hurdles to their livelihood are numerous, spanning a worsening climate crisis, habitat loss, pollution and — as Congress members debated this week — proliferating predators.

The House Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries on Tuesday probed bipartisan legislation co-sponsored by Reps. Michael Baumgartner, R-Spokane, and Emily Randall, D-Bremerton, that would ease restrictions in the Marine Mammal Protection Act for killing sea lions and seals, renewing a decades-old conversation over whether humans should intervene to curb pinniped predation. It’s the second attempt this month by a Washington lawmaker to expand culling of the marine mammals.

The debate comes as marine wildlife officials investigate the shooting of a baby harbor seal found near Bellingham this month with a gunshot wound to its face. The pup, euthanized last week by medical professionals, is the third seal treated for a gunshot injury by SR3, a nonprofit sea life response, rehabilitation and research facility in Des Moines, in the past year, underscoring the tensions surrounding the animals even as Congress weighs broader lethal management.

Baumgartner in a statement before the hearing said his bill is a “common-sense” update that would allow Washington state and federally recognized tribes in Western Washington to explore new ways to responsibly manage booming pinniped populations. Randall told the committee that declining salmon runs also threaten tribal treaty-reserved fishing rights. “We have to find ecosystem balance,” she said. “Nonlethal methods of controlling the pinniped population haven’t worked for us.”

Both first-term members of Washington’s congressional delegation emphasized the bipartisan nature of the effort. Still, lawmakers representing the Pacific Northwest clashed on whether greater allowances to kill sea lions and seals is an effective — or prudent — solution.

Salmon recovery is widely viewed as vital to Washington state and the broader Pacific Northwest because salmon are a cornerstone of the region’s ecosystems and economy. They provide food for numerous species, including endangered southern resident orca whales, and are essential to sustaining Northwest commercial and recreational fisheries, as well as tribal treaty-protected fishing traditions.

Baumgartner and Randall’s Northwest Endangered Salmon Predation Prevention Act of 2026 would broaden where, and how, Washington state and Western Washington tribes with protected fishing rights can manage the growing sea lion and seal populations. In 2018, Congress authorized Washington state to expand a program to capture and euthanize sea lions in the Columbia River Basin due to concerns for salmon survival.

Their bill goes further, expanding the law from “sea lions” to all pinnipeds, including harbor seals, California sea lions and Steller’s sea lions. It would remove geographical restrictions limiting killings to portions of the Columbia River and eliminates the requirement that chemical euthanasia be the only approved killing method. It would take the effort beyond the Columbia River, too, establishing permits for tribes and state officials to kill pinnipeds in “each river and stream in the State of Washington that flows into the marine waters of the State.” The bill would also direct the development of nonlethal methods that prevent pinnipeds from traveling upstream into salmon habitats.

There are five species of pinnipeds that frequent Oregon and Washington (Pacific Harbor Seal, Northern Elephant Seal, California Sea Lion, Steller Sea Lion, and the Northern Fur Seal). As for regulating these populations, it seems that a major impetus is the need of indigenous people to harvest salmon.  Unless we are somehow responsible for the growing pinniped populations (and I haven’t seen any data supporting that), I’d like to know how this happened. You don’t go killing seals and sea lions so you can support a salmon-based economy.  It looks as if in fact humans are responsible for the decline of salmon, and we have no right to kill pinnipeds to rectify something that’s the fault of humanity. THERE WILL BE NO EUTHANIZING OF PINNIPEDS—not if I had any say in the matter.

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili’s bossing Andrzej around:

Hili: It’s a good thing you swept the floor. It was getting pretty dirty.
Andrzej: Keep your comments to yourself.

In Polish:

Hili: Dobrze, że pozamiatałeś, bo było już bardzo brudno.
Ja: Zachowaj swoje uwagi dla siebie.

*******************

From Meow Incorporated:

From The Grammar Police (strictly speaking, this is not ungrammatical):

From Things with Faces, a happy loaf:

From Masih:

From Barry: Evolution wins!

A bio-inspired robot crosses paths with a real insect , 400 million years of evolution face to face with human engineering.

Digital Brain (@yourdigitalbrain.bsky.social) 2026-07-18T16:11:42.000Z

Carole Hooven vs. Agustín “Spectrum” Fuentes (click to go to original tweets):

The Number Ten Cat is looking for an assistant, but not one to turn the spotlight away from the Boss:

One from my feed; live and learn!

And one I reposted from The Auschwitz Memorial:

And two from Matthew. He said the first one will leave you weeping (sound up):

From the brink of death,not a moment too soon.👍💙😍

omgisme (@omgisme.bsky.social) 2026-07-23T18:59:35.494Z

And of this one he says “lovely molluscs!”. Yep, squid are molluscs:

👽🦑🛸👽🦑🛸 #squidsquad #caribbeanreefsquid #cephalopodsofcoralcity #squid #coralcitycamera

Coral City Camera (@coralcitycamera.bsky.social) 2026-07-19T16:06:10.532Z

Jesus ‘n’ Mo ‘n’ science

July 24, 2026 • 10:15 am

Today’s Jesus and Mo post, called “Cern2,” is a repost from 14 years ago, for the artist is on hols.

At Botany Pond yesterday, I met a woman who, after she found out I taught evolution, told me that evolution was a fiction because it couldn’t explain where everything came from in the first place. Then she asked me if I’d studied the Bible. I told her I actuall read the Bible (how many atheist scientists have done that?), and she said, “No, I mean really studied it.”  I told her to read my book Faith Versus Fact and politely made my farewells.

But I digress; here the boys attempt (but fail) to reconcile science and religion.