Jesus ‘n’ Mo ‘n’ AI

October 28, 2026 • 7:45 am

Today’s Jesus and Mo strip, called “charming,” came with a reference:

Here’s the article about AI religio-bots.

It’s an AP article that says this (among other things):

For some evangelical Christians, faith is about having a personal relationship with Jesus. At $1.99 per minute, the tech company Just Like Me is taking that concept to a new level.

Users of the platform can join video calls with an avatar of Jesus generated by artificial intelligence. Like other religious AI tools on the market, it offers words of prayer and encouragement in various languages. With the occasional glitch, it remembers previous conversations and speaks through not-quite-synced lips.

You can also talk to avatars of Charlie Kirk, Santa Claus, or your twin.

Two bucks a minute is expensive! But the strip is funny.

Jesus ‘n’ Mo ‘n’ spying

October 21, 2026 • 8:30 am

Today’s new Jesus and Mo strip, called “spying”, breaks the wall to bring the artist right into the strip. And the book they’re reading is one I just received (see below):

The “thing” is the artist, of course, who has just produced a new book: Jesus and Mo: The Chosen Ones, a “best of” collection covering the last two decades.  And the cartoons really are a hilarious collection: 151 pages of them. You can buy it here for only $18, and it would make a good present for heathens during the upcoming religious season.

I have my copy:

Jesus ‘n’ Mo ‘n’ insults

October 14, 2026 • 7:45 am

The latest Jesus and Mo strip, “fifty”, is a good one, and refers to a BBC article excerpted below. The “pedophilia” question refers to Muhammad’s youngest wife, Aisha, whom he married when she was six. (When the marriage was actually consummated is a vigorously disputed subject.)

Here’s the note that came with the email:

Today’s strip is in response to a story about the revoked death sentence of a Saudi-based Sri Lankan man who insulted Mohammed on Facebook.

From the BBC story:

The case sent shockwaves through Sri Lanka, spurring diplomatic efforts to seek clemency

Saudi Arabia’s Supreme Court has set aside the death sentence handed to a Sri Lankan migrant worker over a comment he made on Facebook, Colombo’s Deputy Foreign Minister Arun Hemachandra said.

Anojan Sivarasa, 27, was sentenced to death in September after a Saudi appellate court convicted him of blasphemy against Islam and the Prophet Muhammad over his comment.

The case sent shockwaves through Sri Lanka, spurring diplomatic efforts to seek clemency.

Saudi Arabia’s top court set aside the sentence on Wednesday, Hemachandra said in a post on Facebook, where he thanked the authorities and legal teams of both nations for their efforts.

In late June, footage of a young Muslim man kicking a dog following Hindu pilgrims circulated widely on social media, triggering religious arguments online.

During the exchange, a user posted derogatory remarks about a Hindu deity, leading Sivarasa to respond in Tamil insulting the Prophet Muhammad.

Although Sivarasa promptly deleted the comment and posted an apology video, a screenshot of it was brought to the attention of his employer and Saudi officials, leading to his arrest in July.

It is not clear if there will be further legal proceedings or whether Sivarasa will remain in detention, and for how long. He was initially sentenced to five years in prison as well as a fine of three million Saudi riyals ($0.8m; £0.6m) by the Al-Ahsa Criminal Court.

The death sentence came later, but is now revoked. It’s still ridiculous and barbaric treatment for insulting religion. I know of no other faith that would do something like this.

Oh, and the artist said this in his note to Patrons:

In other news, there’s a new Jesus & Mo book out! It’s a “best of” collection called The Chosen Ones – a selection of about 150 from 2005-2026. It would be a lovely Xmas present for the infidel in your life!

Also, if you wish to support J&M’s continued existence, please consider becoming a Patron. Just a dollar or two a month makes a difference.

Thanks for subscribing. See you next week!

Author, Jesus & Mo

Jesus ‘n’ Mo ‘n’ retrodiction

September 30, 2026 • 8:15 am

Today’s Jesus and Mo strip, called “bang2“, is an old one that I don’t remember, but it’s a good one. The term “retrodiction” is mine, though someone might have throught of it before I did.

The strip came with a note, and notice the new book on sale:

A resurrection from 2008 today, slightly edited. In other news, there’s a new J&M book out! It’s a best-of compilation, selected by me. 150 pages of J&M, without any crap ones!

In the strip below, of course you know who “Al” is, right?

Jesus ‘n’ Mo ‘n’ free speech

September 24, 2026 • 8:15 am

The latest Jesus and Mo strip, called “grail,” deals with a recent series of events in which John Cleese toured the UK, first showing the classic comedy film “Monty Python and the Holy Grail,” which was then “followed by an uproarious conversation and audience Q&A with Cleese himself, where he’ll share behind-the-scenes stories, wit, and wisdom – assuming he remembers any of it.” The traveling show ended two days ago.

Muslims are objecting to the show, but not because of the movie, since the movie has not a word in it about Muhammed or Islam—it’s satirical about Christianity alone.  Apparently Muslims are objecting to what Cleese has said about Islam in recent years.  When I asked Grok  “What has John Cleese said about Muslims that has angered them”?  I got this response (with references, which I’ve omitted):

John Cleese has made a series of public comments—mostly on X in recent years, plus earlier interviews and tweets—criticizing aspects of Islamic doctrine, certain practices associated with some Muslim communities, and demographic/cultural changes in Britain. These have drawn accusations of Islamophobia from Muslim activists, publications like 5Pillars and Middle East Eye, and groups that have called for his events to be cancelled. He rejects the “Islamophobic” label, calling himself an “Islamosceptic” and arguing that criticizing a religion or culture is not the same as hating its adherents. He frequently contrasts this with the satirical treatment of Christianity in Monty Python’s Life of Brian.

Notable statements that prompted backlash include:

  • Claims that the Quran or Islamic teaching is “all about killing infidels,” acquiring power, and imposing Islam, and references to “Koranic demands to kill ‘infidels’” or beheading them. He has asked whether the “Islamic intention to kill all non-Muslims” or “beheading of infidels” has been dropped from the agenda
  • A 2026 post stating he particularly dislikes Islam because “it demands child marriage, female genital mutilation, the beating of wives, the killing of infidels, the unending promotion of the worst aspects of the male ego, and a complete refusal to contemplate multiculturalism.” He has listed similar practices (FGM, child marriage, wife-beating, stoning) as reasons he prefers other cultures.
  • “Like a bunch of five-year-olds, Muslims just want their own way, and will kill non-Muslims to achieve it.” He has also said some Muslims want “uniculturalism” rather than multiculturalism and show little respect for other traditions.
  • Warnings that replacing British/Christian-influenced values with Islamic ones would mean “this will not be Britain any more,” and questions about an “Islamic intent to take over the world.” He has described Muslim beliefs as “attacking British values.”
  • Older remarks (2011 and 2019) that London “is no longer an English city” or “not really an English city any more,” which some critics tied to immigration and multiculturalism; London Mayor Sadiq Khan and others called the comments out of touch or worse. Cleese said they were about cultural character (calmer, more polite, less money-oriented) rather than race.
  • Comments on free speech and satire: comics hold back from joking about Islam because they risk being killed (referencing Charlie Hebdo and similar cases); a “Life of Muhammad” equivalent to Life of Brian would be life-threatening; and “Islamophobia” is an incorrect term used to frame criticism as irrational fear or racism rather than cultural disagreement. In a 2015 interview he said Muslims living in the West have a right to be ridiculed like anyone else, but he would not mock the Prophet.

These remarks led to protests and a 2026 campaign by Birmingham activists (Deenified) to cancel a Holy Grail screening and Q&A, in which they called him a “hate preacher” spreading “dangerous misinformation” and creating hostility toward Muslims. Cleese responded that many “Islamic folk” have a good sense of humor and irony. He has consistently said he distinguishes ideas and specific doctrines/practices from individual people and notes that he faced no equivalent “Christophobic” label after mocking Christianity.

Here is a link to the kerfuffle in Birmingham about the show. A few words from a source, “Townhall,” that itself looks a bit biased.

Comedy legend John Cleese held his “John Cleese and the Holy Grail” show this weekend in Birmingham, but it was not without controversy. Islamist activists and content creators known as Deenified attacked Cleese prior to the event, saying he’s “not welcome” in Birmingham.

“John Cleese, we heard that you’re coming to Birmingham Town Hall to perform this so-called comedy show,” said one of the men.

“For years, you have used your platform to attack Islam, spreading dangerous misinformation and creating hostility towards Muslims,” said the other.

They’re proving Cleese correct, of course. Islam is a religion of death, of killing, of intimidation, and of destruction. It must be removed from the West if it cannot tolerate criticism and free thought.

A hostile tweet from Muslims, who of course have the right to object:

A response from my friend Melissa Chen:

And two responses from Cleese:

In my view, this is a free-speech issue, though Britain has no First Amendment and seems more willing than the U.S. to crack down on “hate speech”. Still, Cleese should have the right to say what he wants, and Muslims should have the right to object, though not to block access to his shows or try to get them canceled.

. . . and Mo’s response, which implies that he does want freedom of speech curbed when it comes to crtiticizing Islam. Cleese, of course, spent his career criticizing nearly everything.