E! about to debut new show starring a psychic “grief vampire”

January 21, 2016 • 9:30 am

As Susan Gerbic (head of Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia) reports on the Center for Inquiry site, the t.v. entertainment network E! is going the route of the History Channel—touting the paranormal. The “psychic” in question is one Tyler Henry, also touted as a “Celebrity Clairvoyant” or the “Hollywood Medium”, he’s very young (just 20) and good-looking, and has just been given his own show.

To wit, this is from Henry’s Facebook page; apparently the lad is endorsed and was presented by the odious Oprah-acolyte Dr. Phil:

Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 8.11.06 AM 12509268_983084628431456_5589832842810470152_n

Now “E!” stands for “entertainment,” but Henry’s supposed ability to discern things about people (“cold readings”) and put them in touch with the dead are presented not as entertainment—like magicians who emphasize that they’re doing tricks, not real magic—but as REALITY.

From E! (here and here):

The small-town native is a medium extraordinaire to some of the biggest stars in Los Angeles!

E!’s latest series Hollywood Medium will document Tyler’s experiences as he uses his special clairvoyant abilities to give readings and connect celebrities like Jaime Pressly, Bella Thorne and Snooki with their loved ones on the other side.

“I really think I knew I was different when I was able to see and feel things that most people weren’t able to,” Tyler says in the teaser.

and

The celebrity clairvoyant may be able to communicate with the dead, but he has never learned to drive a car!

No, E!, he can’t communicate with the dead!

Referring to an interview with Henry conducted by Out magazine (Henry’s gay), Gerbic says this:

Here it is. The part that makes it clear whether he is a psychic entertainer who is up-front about his act or just another grief vampire. Henry tells the interviewer his goal for the future. It is to work with parents who have lost their children to suicide. I can feel my blood pressure increasing and the hackles on the back of my neck starting to rise. He isn’t just a grief vampire; he is aspiring to be one of the most despicable types of grief vampires, tying for first place with those who work as psychic detectives. These are the people who prey on families when they are the most desperate and vulnerable. I’m appalled that he thinks this is something to aspire to. Something to be proud of!

In the Out interview, Henry gives a bit of lip service to skepticism:

The skeptic in me wants to know if your gift has ever been criticized, or if you’ve been asked to prove your ability?

Lots of people feel either that [my gift needs] to be proven or that, on a personal level, they need the validation that their loved one is ok. Some people come to readings with a ‘prove-it-to-me’ mentality and others come with an openness.

I do inherently understand both sides. I think it’s important to have a healthy degree of skepticism. I myself am a very skeptical person. In readings, my goal is to bring up information that there really is no way I could know. I don’t like saying general things. I don’t like saying information that everybody knows. I focus on information that can’t be researched or googled, and that usually includes inside jokes or sentimental pieces of information that only families really know.

In high school and earlier on, my issue wasn’t that I dealt with people who didn’t necessarily believe in me. Unfortunately, there was a lot of fundamentalism and people who didn’t like what I did because it conflicted with their beliefs.

People were more frightened by what I did, and that was a different kind of isolation in the sense that people were judging me from a religious perspective. But I found that as time went on, people did open their minds, well some did, and for those who didn’t, I understand that we’re all entitled to our beliefs.

This is just classic cold reading based on psychological cues given off by the mark, things that the “clairvoyant” could look up online (he claims he doesn’t), or general statements that are true a lot of the time (see below for links to tricks used in this practice). If Henry wants a serious test of his abilities, let someone like James Randi or Penn and Teller set up a real examination of his abilities—tests that “psychics” never submit to.

The sad part of all this is that Henry is going to be on a show on a widely-watched network, one that presents his duplicity as if it were real clairvoyance. And a lot of his efforts will be directed at soothing parents whose children have killed themselves. (Believe me, those parents will all receive reassuring messages that their kid is in Heaven and looking down on them. Nobody is going to hear that the kid is frying in Hell.)

What’s the harm in that, you ask? Why not tell parents soothing fictions if it makes them feel better? The harm is that it is all a fabric of lies, but, more important, it simply buttresses those people who believe in the afterlife and the ability of psychics to suss it out. And, of course, Henry will make tons of money promulgating these lies. Remember that Americans spend two billion dollars a year on psychics, and, like religion, the psychic business booms during tough economic times. These people prey on the poor and disaffected, often through “telephone consultations”. People like Henry may be attractive and slick, but in the end they’re simply enriching themselves by preying on vulnerable people. You can bet your ass his services aren’t free.

For discussions of how these “psychics” do their tricks, go here, here, and here. (There are many other “whistle-blower” sites.) As has been noted many times before, if these people really could see back into the past, they wouldn’t be doing storefront readings; they’d be finding hidden treasure. Or, if they can foresee the future, they’d make a killing on the stock market.

Here’s Henry meeting the Kardashians and working his scam:

(Want more? Go here.)

What a fricking charlatan.

Sarah Palin blames son’s domestic violence on Obama

January 21, 2016 • 8:20 am

Most of you may have heard that Sarah Palin’s 26-year-old son Track Palin was arrested in Wasilla, Alaska on Monday for domestic violence. He apparently slugged his girlfriend, pulled out a gun, and threatened her. Here’s an excerpt from the police report (name of victim redacted):

Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 7.34.30 AM Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 7.35.27 AM Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 7.35.34 AM

As Gawker reported, Track was arrested for “assault in the fourth degree (domestic violence), interfering with a report of domestic violence, and possession of a weapon while intoxicated.”

Now I’m not going to tar Palin with her son’s misdeeds. Suffice it to say that this “model American family” has its problems. But where I do fault Palin is for blaming the actions of Track, an Iraq war veteran, on the Obama administration. As PuffHo reports:

Palin decided to address what she called “the elephant in the room” during a campaign rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, before she introduced Donald Trump, whom she endorsed Tuesday.

“My son, like so many others, they come back a bit different. They come back hardened, they come back wondering if there’s that respect for what it is their fellow soldiers and airmen and every other member of the military have so sacrificially given to this country,” Palin said, adding that she can “relate with other families who can feel these ramifications of PTSD and some of the woundedness our soldiers do return with.”

Palin went on to criticize the Obama administration’s treatment of veterans, implying that the president had something to do with her son’s situation.

The Washington Post gives more detail about what Palin said:

“It’s a shame that our military personnel even have to wonder if they have to question if they’re respected anymore. It starts from the top,” said Palin. “The question, though, it comes from our own president where they have to look at him and wonder, ‘Do you know what we go through? Do you know what we’re trying to do to secure America and to secure the freedoms that have been bequeathed us?’”

Now I’ve learned that Palin’s son was in a combat unit in Iraq for a year in 2008, but I can’t find evidence that he was actually involved in any fighting. Nevertheless, I suppose just being in a combat zone itself could cause mental problems that later trigger violent behavior.

But that doesn’t matter, because Sarah Palin not only overlooked Obama’s extensive efforts to help veterans (and Republicans’ opposition to bills providing veterans benefits; see also here), but uttered not a single word of sympathy for the victim of her son’s attack. She is making political capital out of a deplorable physical attack on a woman.

At least one veteran’s organization has decried Sarah Palin’s attempt to tar the President for what her son did (it’s not clear, by the way, whether Track Palin even has post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD):

“It’s not President Obama’s fault that Sarah Palin’s son has PTSD,” said Paul Rieckhoff, who heads Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA). “PTSD is a very serious problem, a complicated mental health injury and I would be extremely reluctant to blame any one person in particular.”

A few Europeans I talked to are amazed that Palin is even taken seriously as an American political figure. But one added, correctly, that when she endorsed Donald Trump for President in a speech we liberals find hilarious, she was hitting exactly the right notes that resonated with Iowa Republicans.

Readers’ wildlife photographs

January 21, 2016 • 7:15 am

Mark Sturtevant has some biology lessons along with his insect photos:

When I go out to hunt for arthropods with my camera, I am pretty content to get pictures of a critter just sitting on a leaf. But it is a bonus if I can capture images of interesting behaviors. Here are two examples of such behaviors.

During last summer I would spend a lot of camera time stalking insects in our ‘sun garden’. This garden is dominated by pretty and aromatic Phlox flowers, but no insects visit them I think because the corollas are rather long. But late in the summer the situation changes when the large Eastern carpenter bees (Xylocopa virginica) emerge and visit them in droves. However, they always disappear deep into the flower bunches rather than forage from the faces of the flowers. I was rather puzzled about that, and wondered what they were doing. The first two pictures show the answer: they are nectar robbers on these flowers. That is they go the to flower base and pierce it to get nectar without also getting pollen. This behavior was previously described here by reader Bruce Lyon for hummingbirds.

1 nectarrobber

2 nectarrobber

The next picture shows a routine scene: a male Eastern pondhawk dragonfly (Erythemis simplicicollis) on its perch beside a lake. Younger males of this species are mostly green, like the females. But the males later change to this lovely color. Anyway, this male was very active. It would frequently fly out of my camera field of view, then return to the same spot. While it was off I would creep a little closer to get a better angle. After several of these excursions from its perch the hunter again returned to my field of view, but as the final picture will show it did not return alone…

3 dragonfly7-2

When it next appeared in my camera viewfinder it was carrying a mating pair of damselflies! These may be a species of ‘dancer’ (genus Argia) but I am not sure of that. While I watched and took pictures, the dragonfly was steadily chewing up the female. Meanwhile the male desperately clawed at the rock to break away. He did manage to detach and fly off, but only just barely!

4 dragonfly8-2

Dennis Mitton, whose website is My Selfish Gene, sends us a snake:

Here’s a shot of a baby copperhead [Agkistrodon contrortrix] greeting me as I left the house to go running one night. They are common here in South Carolina but aren’t often seen as they blend in so well with our native landscape. This guy sticks out like a sore thumb. Per the State of SC they are uncommonly docile unless aggressively roused. I grabbed this little guy with a garden rake and he – she – rode it quietly while I walked a few hundred yards down the road to release it into some woods.

Dennis Mitton

Reader Anne-Mari Cournoyer a climber and leader of outdoor expeditions to remote places (including those to the frozen north where you must drag your own sled of noms and equipment), further honors Squirrel Appreciation Day:

All that thinking about squirrels last night reminded me of that photo taken during my climbing years. A little friend, regular visitor of our packs, very interested by our climbing ropes (oops! not a good thing for our safety!) If I am not mistaken: a Cascade golden-mantled ground squirrelSpermophilus saturatus.

rongeur sac à dos_2

Thursday: Hili dialogue (and Leon and squirrel lagniappe)

January 21, 2016 • 6:00 am

I’ll be brief this morning, and posting may be light as I’m heading downtown to the Fifth Circle of Hell, aka the Visa Office for India (trip coming up!). There, despite having an appointment, I will likely cool my heels for an hour in the midst of general turmoil and fracas. I’d best bring something to read. Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is once again appropriating other peoples’ clothes.

Hili: Where did you buy such a nice sleeping bag for a cat?
Malgorzata: This is my waistcoat!

P1030807 (1)

In Polish:
Hili: Gdzie kupiliście taki ładny śpiwór dla kota?
Małgorzata: To jest moja kamizelka!
Leon’s staff has taken him once again for his annual hike in the Polish mountains, so we can expect some nice photos in the days to come. Here’s today’s monologue from the car on the way to the mountains.
Leon: In 100 meters you have to turn right.
12509853_1084869768200290_5874026419952096245_n
Serious Cat is serious.

Last but not least: in case you didn’t know, today is Squirrel Appreciation Day! Be sure to give some noms to these adorable rodents who brighten our lives so much (anybody saying squirrels should be shot or eaten will be banned). Reader Anne-Marie Cournoyer sent a special squirrel to celebrate.

A humming squirrel: “It’s gonna be a bright, bright sun-shiny day…”
At last, my day in the sun! Come on, show me your appreciation and bring in the nuts! Today’s the day! —Jimmy Cliff / Woodstock 94

DSCN0854_2

And from the atheist cartoon collection of Heather Hastie:

Suffer the little squirrels

The Joe Black joke

January 20, 2016 • 3:00 pm

I’m not even going to try to show some gravitas today. Instead, we’ll finish the day (it snowed, too) with the Joe Black joke, which for some reason I find hilarious. I can’t remember who first told it to me, but stop me if you’ve heard it before.

Two guys were sitting in a bar talking.  One guy was Joe Black, and the other guy was named Fred. As they were talking, people kept coming in and going out of the bar. Everyone who walked past said “Hi” to Joe Black.

Fred finally said. “Wow, Joe—you really know a lot of people”.  To this Joe replied,  “I do indeed. In fact, I know everyone in the world“. At this Fred laughed.  “No, really!” said Joe, “I really do know everyone in the whole world.”  They argued quite a while about this until Fred said, “I’ll bet $1,000 that you don’t know the Mayor.”

Joe warned Fred that he did know the Mayor and that Fred was sure to lose his money.  Fred took the bet anyway.  So on to the Mayor’s office they went. Upon entering, they were greeted by the secretary with, “Hi, Joe, how ya doing today?” Joe said, “Great; I need to see the Mayor”.  To make a long long story a little shorter, the Mayor knew Joe very well.

Fred was a little upset about this and asked Joe if he could go double or nothing on whether Joe knew the President of the United States.  Joe warned Fred again that he was going to lose his money, but if Fred were willing to pay for their travel to Washington, D.C., he’d gladly take  the bet. As it turned out, the President knew Joe very well, even inviting the two for dinner in the White House.

After this Fred was really pissed.  He said, “Joe, I’ll bet you $100,000 that you don’t know the Pope.” (Fred was a rich guy.) Joe tried to talk Fred out of the bet, again telling him he would lose his money, but Fred insisted.  So off to Rome they went.

When they got to the Vatican, Joe told Fred that not just anybody could get inside to see the Pope. He gave Fred a pair of binoculars and told  him to climb a hill behind the Vatican and watch for him and the Pope to come out in the yard and wave to him. Fred was a little wary at first but finally agreed.

Fred waited on the deserted hill in the hot sun for over an hour. Just when he was about to leave, he saw two people coming out the Vatican door. The two walked  to the middle of the courtyard and started waving up at the hill.

Fred wasn’t sure what the Pope really looked like, and, since he had a lot of money riding on this, he wanted to make sure that it really was the Pope, “But how?”, he thought. Just then a dusty-looking old peasant walked by. Fred figured that a local should know what the Pope looked like, and called him over. Fred gave him the binoculars and asked him who those people were waving below.

To this the peasant replied, “I’m not sure who the guy in the robe is, but that other guy is Joe Black!”

I’ll be here all week, folks. Don’t forget to tip the waitress. And leave your favorite joke in the comments.

Spot the panda!

January 20, 2016 • 12:30 pm

I can’t brain today; I don’t want to attack fellow liberals and nonbelievers with whom I basically agree (why do people do that?); and I’m sick to death of reading and writing about the never-ending malevolence and evils of faith. Every day brings more news of such things, and what is there to do but point it out? Shall we have a panda to lighten our spirits? Yes, that’s just the ticket. And maybe some jokes later.

From IFL Science via reader Mark Sturtevant comes a “spot the panda” drawing. There are several ways to see it more clearly, but I’ll leave that up to you:

hidden panda_0

Taliban kill 22 at Pakistan university

January 20, 2016 • 10:30 am

It was just today that the Taliban assaulted Bacha Khan university, killing faculty, students, and four guards. At least 22 are reported dead. All four attackers were killed before they could detonate their suicide vests. As the New York Times reports, the Taliban stated their reasons:

Khalifa Umar Mansoor, a Pakistani Taliban leader, called reporters in Peshawar to claim responsibility for the attack and to say that four of their men were involved. He said the assault was in response for the execution in December of four men convicted of aiding the 2014 Peshawar school attackers.

Note that this has nothing to do with Western colonialism.

And do have a look at what that Prime Minister said:

Pakistan’s prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, condemned the attack. “We are determined and resolved in our commitment to wipe out the menace of terrorism from our homeland,” he said in a statement from Switzerland, where he was attending the World Economic Forum. “The countless sacrifices made by our countrymen will not go in vain, inshallah.”

It’s the last word that’s so ironic.

She’s baaaack!: Sarah Palin endorses Trump

January 20, 2016 • 9:30 am

Well, this is going to be an interesting election season, though I don’t see any good outcome. Bernie Sanders has moved way ahead of Hillary Clinton in Iowa, so perhaps he has a crack at the Democratic nomination—though I still wouldn’t bet on it. And even if a Democrat is elected in November, be it Clinton or Sanders, not much will happen,for both will be deadlocked with a Republican Congress, though for different reasons. Meanwhile, the GOP camp continues as a source of amazement, with Trump and Cruz going after each other hammer and tong. There’s not a credible leader among them, which speaks very poorly of Republicans (and our country in general).

The latest LOL is Sarah Palin’s endorsement of Donald Trump yesterday in Iowa. I’ve embedded her speech below. If you can watch the first three minutes without gritting your teeth, you’re a better person than I. If you can make it through the whole 21 minutes, you deserve a medal. (I did!)

How could it come to this in America: Sarah Palin is regarded as not only a celebrity, but as someone whose endorsement is worth having? DO NOT MISS her loud claim that Trump will “KICK ISIS’S ASS!” at 5:46, and her misuse of the word “largesse” as a perjorative at 15:48.

Where’s Tina Fey when we need her? Just the sight of Palin and Trump standing side-by-side on a platform, with Trump grinning like a fool and nodding like a bobblehead figure as Palin praises him, is an embarrassment to our country.

Finally, the Daily News headline from today: 569f05ee2a00004d00030dac