April Fool’s joke

April 3, 2015 • 10:30 am

The Chronicle of Higher Education notes a geeky but funny prank pulled off by a professor at Biola Univesity. Biola, you may recall, is an evangelical Christian school in Los Angeles whose present name is an acronym of its former one: The Bible Institute of Los Angeles. It espouses creationism.

The Chronicle‘s words are indented:

April Fools’ Day can be treacherous, especially in academe (I’m lookingatyou, student newspapers). But I’m happy to report that pulling off a good, wholesome joke — one that doesn’t make light of both racism and genocide — is possible in an academic setting.

Cue Matthew Weathers, an assistant professor of mathematics and computer science at Biola University, who on Wednesday delighted his students with an impressively choreographed — and exceedingly nerdy — piece of pedagogy:

As Weathers posted on the YouTube video, “I played a trick on my math class for April Fool’s Day. In this one, I’m showing a ‘homework help’ video that gets some trigonometry wrong. How embarrassing!”

Here it is, and it’s quite clever:

It’s worth noting that Mr. Weathers is no amateur, to either YouTube or technological high jinks. He’s pulled several similar April Fools’ stunts in the past, all viewable on his user page.

h/t: Robin

 

Bad news: “nones” projected to fall as percentage of worldwide population

April 3, 2015 • 9:00 am

Most of you have probably heard of this recent Pew Survey projecting how, from demographic data, the world’s religions will fare over the period between 2010 and 2050.

Sadly, although the number of the religously “unaffiliated” (nonbelievers plus believers without a church) will rise a tad during those four decades, the proportion will fall a tad. Further bad news, in my view—for I see Islam as the world’s most pernicious faith at the moment—is the rise of Islam, which by 2050 will almost equal Christians in both absolute numbers and percentage of the world population (Christianity is and will remain, barely, the world’s most popular faith). The growth of Islam is due to a much higher fertility of Muslims than of members of other faiths.

Here is the most important data, with absolute numbers on the left and percentages on the right. Muslim percentages rise most rapidly, Christians and Hindus stay about the same, while the unaffiliated and the Buddhists take a hit. The total world population in 2050 is estimated to be 9.3 billion, a 35% increase over its 2010 value. That’s just too many people!

PF_15.04.02_ProjectionsOverview_projectedChange640px Here is what will happen to us, the “nones” (also including those with belief in numinous stuff but without formal membership in a church):

PF_15.04.02_ProjectionsOverview_unaffiliated2_640px

Heathens need to have more kids! (Not really; there are too many already.)  And of course the reason for all the growth of Islam is not conversions, but fertility excess. The unaffiliated have only a bit more than half the fertility of Muslims, and significantly less than Christians. That is, of course, because unbelievers don’t have strictures like not using contraception, and are, I suspect, more ecologically aware! That puts us having a fitness as low as Buddhists. But look how far Muslims are above everyone else in birthrate:

PF_15.04.02_ProjectionsOverview_totalFertility_640px

The growth of Islam is augmented by the fact that, among world religions, it has the highest proportion of adherents approaching childbearing age. The proportion of Muslims in 2010 under age 15 was 34%, higher than that of any other faith (it’s 27% for Christians, for instance, 21% for Jews, and a meager 19% for the unaffiliated).

Some of the change, but not much, is due to religious switching, and most of that switching is either away from Christianity or towards “unaffiliated status”. But the heartening rise in the numbers who give up formal religion is not enough to overcome our lower fertility:

PF_15.04.02_ProjectionsOverview_religiousSwitching_640px

The Pew article has a ton more data, including information about immigration, and about how the U.S. itself will change, summarized in the figure below. What’s happening to the U.S. gives us at least some good news: Christians will decline by 12%, largely displaced by the “nones”, who will increase by 9.2%. Muslims increase only slightly, from 0.9% to 2.1%, of the total population but that’s still more than a doubling in percentage.

PF_15.04.02_ProjectionsOverview_usReligComposition_310px

Finally, while the good news is that the whole world is becoming less dominated by Christians, the bad news is that it’s being replaced not by nonbelief, but by Islam. This will certainly cause more inter-faith tensions in the next few decades. As the chart below shows, Islam will become the dominant faith in several places, but in the enlightened nations of France, New Zealand, and the Netherlands, the dominant “faith” will no longer be Christianity, but “unaffiliated”!  And in Australia and the UK, the proportions of Christians will drop below half, though of course that’s a purely arbitrary cutoff given the panoply of faiths on offer.

pf_15.04.02_projectionstables18

What can we expect from all this? I’m not a prognosticator, but unless Islam undergoes a reformation (which is what Ayaan Hirsi Ali calls for in her latest book Heretic (a Professor Ceiling Cat Recommendation™), we can predict more bloodshed, more religious rivalry (which of course wouldn’t exist if the whole world were unbelievers), and more strife in general.  Let us hope that Islamic extremism wanes, and that Islamic moderates stop countenancing it to such a large extent. I don’t believe that will happen by 2050, but unless I live to be over a hundred, I won’t know.

h/t: Alberto, Heather

Readers’ wildlife photos

April 3, 2015 • 8:00 am

I’ve left most of my photos on my laptop in Chicago, so I’ll be largely restricted to posting things that are sent while I’m in Boston (till April 9).  Fortunately, Stephen Barnard sends photos regularly, and, even more fortunately, they’re good ones. Here are a few

Northern harriers (Circus cyaneus):

I was walking along an abandoned railroad right of way that run beside my ranch, and I’m sure the harriers have a nest nearby. She wasn’t happy with my presence.

RT9A8860

RT9A8879

RT9A8888

Kildeer (Charadrius vociferus):

RT9A8807 - Version 2

Stephen identified this only as “a mammal.” Name the exact species:

Rabbit, Mar. 30

Bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus).

These eagles are so used to me and Deets [his border collie] it’s ridiculous. Last year it would have spooked if I’d been anywhere near this close.

Look at those talons!

Eagle, Mar. 30

I was almost directly under this bird that was on one of its favorite perches. I looked down and saw eagle poop all over the place.

Eagle Mar. 30

 

Friday: Hili dialogue

April 3, 2015 • 5:31 am

It’s Friday! Which seat can you take? I am taking one across the table from Uncle Dan Dennett, who will no doubt excoriate me over coffee about my views on free will. But that’s okay, for he has no choice. And, at any rate, I don’t expect he’ll convince me of his compatibilism, any more than he’ll convince me that the coffee I’m drinking is really cocoa, which is the Only Kind of Coffee Worth Wanting. Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is trying to find the Door Into Wonderland:

A: Hili, what are you doing?
Hili: I’m trying to go through the looking glass.

P1020459 (1)

In Polish:
Ja: Hili, co ty robisz?
Hili: Próbuję przejść na drugą stronę lustra.

 

“Death” is not a metaphor: Brian Dalton debunks the myth of the “fundamentalist atheist”

April 2, 2015 • 2:30 pm

Here’s a 20-minute video in which Brian Dalton (formerly “Mr. Deity”) debunks the old canard that passionate atheists are as bad as religious fundamentalists.  At about 3:30, he disposes of the similar claim that atheists always interpret scriptures more literally than do believers. He later argues that religious moderates rather than fundamentalists are the believers who really “pervert the faith.”

Dalton’s bit about the baby and the bathwater at about 12:30 is nice, and don’t miss the powerful summing-up beginning at 19:15.

Of course Dalton’s vigorous defense of anti-theism and criticism of religion is certainly going to brand him as a “fundamentalist atheist.” For in the Thesaurus of Accommodationism and Faitheism, “fundamentalist” is another word for  “passionate.”

h/t: Robin

Southampton university cancels conference questioning Israel’s right to exist

April 2, 2015 • 12:45 pm

This is how far the Israel-bashing has proceeded on the British Left. According to the Torygraph, Southampton University had scheduled a conference on whether Israel had a right to exist, but it was canceled after widespread protests.

The University of Southampton has withdrawn permission for the three-day conference to be held on its campus in the face of criticism from opponents who described it as “giving legitimacy to anti-Semitism”.

Critics said the conference – International Law and the State of Israel: Legitimacy, Responsibility and Exceptionalism – would be a ‘one-sided’ exercise in Israel-bashing and more than 6,000 people signed a petition calling on the university to cancel it.

One of its most respected former alumni returned his degree in protest and at least one major patron of the university was said to have been considering withdrawing funding.

Organisers describe the conference as “the first of its kind and constitutes a ground-breaking historical event … it is unique because it concerns the legitimacy in international law of the Jewish State of Israel.”

The University of Southampton has withdrawn permission for the three-day conference to be held on its campus in the face of criticism from opponents who described it as “giving legitimacy to anti-Semitism”.

The university’s own website advertising the conference, originally planned for April 17 to 19, made no secret of the fact that the event would question both the legal and moral right of the state of Israel to exist, stating:

“It concerns the legitimacy in International Law of the Jewish state of Israel. Rather than focusing on Israeli actions in the 1967 Occupied Territories, the conference will focus on exploring themes of Legitimacy, Responsibility and Exceptionalism; all of which are posed by Israel’s very nature.”

But in a sudden turnaround the university has apparently told the conference’s organisers that the event could no longer go ahead on safety grounds, after fears that demonstrators would try to disrupt the event, clashing with Pro-Palestinian activists expected to demonstrate in support.

The organizers (anti-Israel to a person) decried the cancellation as a violation of free speech, with “safety” being used as an excuse, and I actually agree with them. If the university originally agreed to host this odious conference, then they should not have backed off. It abrogates free speech to cancel it, unless there really were serious threats that someone would be physically (not mentally!) injured. What I do object to is the apparent stacking of the conference with people who were unanimously in agreement with the proposition that Israel shouldn’t exist.

What, no people who think otherwise were going to speak? That’s just dumb for an academic conference, and makes it seem more like an exercise in Israel-bashing than an open discussion. And in fact that it what it was, a meeting verging on official anti-Semitism.

Let’s face it: the only way Israel is going away is if the Palestinians, Iranians, or other Israel-hating countries bomb it out of existence. And why not a conference on other countries’ right to exist? After all, since War Two a lot of nations, including Pakistan, North Korea, and Slovakia (like Israel, designed to encompass an ethnic group), came into existence either by fiat, self-decision, or international mandate. Once again, Israel is being singled out. Why is that, do you suppose?

I shouldn’t have to say this, but since there are so many Israel bashers about, I must reiterate that I’ve always favored the establishment of a Palestinian state, and think that Netanyahu’s statement opposing that (though he’s seemingly retracted his position after his re-election) is reprehensible. A two-state solution is the only viable solution to the Middle East’s problems—or at least that one problem—but I don’t see how it will happen now. Nor do I really think, in my heart of hearts, that a two-state solution will stop Hamas’s attacks on Israel; after all, the Hamas charter itself calls for the complete elimination of that state.

According to the Telegraph, 900 academics and 4,000 people have signed a petition supporting the conference. That shows you the unique demonization of Israel in academica.

h/t: Coel