Readers’ wildlife photos, now with moar biology

February 21, 2015 • 9:06 am

We have two more photos from reader Stephen Barnard in Idaho, who appears to still be alive despite his ownership of a new, high-powered sports car. His customary pair of eagles, Desi and Lucy, have returned as well, and appear ready to make more eaglets.

Yet another Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) in flight:

RT9A4977

The bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus): Lucy (on the left) looks pregnant. It’s about that time. Last year she laid eggs in March. Desi is the male on the right.

RT9A5022

From reader Tim Anderson in Oz:

Here are two pictures of sunset looking west towards the town of Tumut, New South Wales:

TumutSunset

TumutSunset2

Reader Joe Dickinson sent some photographs called “More from Moorea.”

 Tours to see, touch, and snorkel with stingrays (Himantura fai?) and blacktip reef sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) are widely offered in French Polynesia.  They often are in shallow water on sandy bottoms, so pretty good views are possible without going in the water. A snorkel mask and waterproof camera provide better clarity (photo #2).  The rays, in particular, are fully habituated to frequent visitors, so up close and personal contact is easy. Note the remora on the ray’s ventral surface in the second photo.  The sharks usually have one or more remoras either swimming just below catching a ride. I like the final photo for the distorted reflections from the surface.

sharks & rays2

sharks & rays3

Note that the remora’s “sucker” is on its dorsal (top) side, so the one on the shark is riding upside down, while the one on the ray is upright.

Before we go back to the photos, we have a brief biological announcement, for there’s an evolutionary lesson here.

The “sucker” of the remora is remarkable, for it’s simply a modified dorsal fin. That was first conjectured from its morphology, but is now supported by analyzing its development. The following photos and info are from London’s Natural History Museum.

First, here’s the sucker; isn’t it bizarre?

remora-sucking-disc-490_118236_2
Photo by Dave Johnson.

But it’s a modified fin. The reason we know its evolutionary history is that the “sucker” begins developing just like a normal dorsal fin, which you can see by comparing its development to that of the dorsal fin in a sucker-less fish. Here is a sharksucker (Remora sp.) in early development, with the bones stained red. The sucker begins developing just like a normal fin, complete with the fin spines. Bottom photo is closeup of spines:

sharksucker-normal-dorsal-470-118242-1
Photo by Ralph Britz

And then, as the Museum page notes, the structure begins growing and moving forward:

Then, over a series of small changes, the dorsal fin in the Remora begins to expand andshift towards the head.

By the time the Remora has reached around 30mm in length, the dorsal fin has become a fully formed 2mm sucking disc. It still has the components found in the dorsal fin, the tiny fin spines, spine bases and supporting bones, but the spine bases have greatly expanded.

So, the sucking disc is formed by a massive expansion of the dorsal fin through small changes while the fish is developing. It is not the result of the evolution of a completely new structure.

Here’s the diagram of the dorsal fin of a regular suckerless fish (a bass, Morone sp., top) with that of a remora (bottom). The equivalent (“homologous”) parts are given the same numbers. In the remora, the internal bases of the spines (#1) have gotten much longer, the plates anchoring the spines (#2) have become large platelike structures, and the spines themselves (#3) are the lateral structures in the sucker:

sharksucker-123-200-118237-1

 

Here’s the adult remora with the bones stained red. You can clearly see the bony spines, homologous to the regular dorsal-fin spines:

sharksucker-stained-470-118240-1
Photo by Dave Johnson

So, as is usual in evolution, remarkable and useful new structures don’t arise out of nowhere: they’re simply modifications of things that were there before. One can only speculate about the steps taken by evolution to convert a dorsal fin into a sucker. If this is a product of natural selection, and it surely must be because of its complicated design and usefulness, then each intermediate step in the transition between a normal dorsal fin and the highly modified sucker fin must have been adaptive. I leave it to readers to think about how this might have happened gradually, with each modification conferring a reproductive advantage on individuals in the evolving lineage. (Hint: if you give up, read the article by Carl Zimmer highlighted by reader Glenn Butler in the comments.)

One more point: the sucker is so effective that in some places remoras are used to catch turtles—even large ones. They put a line around the remora’s tail, toss it into the water near a turtle, and it promptly heads for and fastens onto the turtle’s shell. (Remoras hate not being fastened to something.) Small turtles are simply reeled in with the fish, and large ones hauled near the boat where they can be harpooned.

Now back to our regular program: the blacktip sharks photographed by Joe:

sharks & rays5

sharks & rays6

 

 

Caturday felid: Gusiversary!

February 21, 2015 • 7:30 am

Today happens to be exactly one year since reader Carol Piller adopted Gus the snow-white cat, a cat deliberately trapped in an outdoor cage last winter by a miscreant, and who, as a result, lost most of his ears to frostbite. But after the local humane society rescued him, Gus found a loving home, and has now become a gentle and sweet-tempered pet—and also the whitest cat I’ve ever seen. He goes outside, but local laws in Canada mandate that he be kept on a harness outside the house.

I nicknamed Gus the cat who is “earless and fearless,” and you can read my earlier posts about him here. His lack of ears makes him look somewhat like a Scottish Fold, but even more adorable.

In honor of Gusiversary, Carol, a musician, wrote and recorded a song in his honor, “White Cat Rag,” and made a video with photos of Gus. Here it is (you may remember her earlier music-and-photo masterpiece, “Hili and Cyrus”):

Some of Carol’s notes about Gus:

I don’t think I ever told you what happened the first day we had Gus. On the first morning after we brought him home there was absolutely no sign of him. We looked all over the house, under and in everything we could think of, but no cat. I had to go to work without knowing where he was and eight hours later, when I came home, there was still no sign him. By this point, I was imagining he had escaped the house. Another hour of desperate searching and I was standing in the basement in despair. Suddenly, I knew where he was. I looked at the bookshelf and there was just enough room to squeeze over the books and go in behind. Sure enough, when I reached in to feel, it was fuzzy! I took the photo called “hiding place” last month: Gus is looking into the very place where he hid that day. I wonder if he remembers.

“Hiding place”:

Hiding Place
“Gus is home” is the first picture I took of him. I must have been too excited because it’s so blurry.

Gus is home
Gus is so photogenic, I have way too many pictures of him. I’ve attached a few other favourites; don’t post them all. [JAC: I did!] “Perfect Gus” is my all-time best photo, I love it; it’s in the White Cat Rag too.

“Perfect Gus”:

Perfect Gus

“Gus has a question”:

Gus has a question

“Gus tongue”:

Gus Tongue

“Upside down”:

Upsidedown

“Gus toes”:

Toes Hair

Here are a few old YouTube videos that you can use if you like. I don’t know why Gus hated that tuft of grass so much! He eventually destroyed it. You always seemed partial to the catnip videos, so I added those especially for you.

Gus attacks a tuft of grass;

Gus enjoys catnip:

Gus is baked after eating catnip:

Happy Gusiversary!

Saturday: Hili dialogue

February 21, 2015 • 5:56 am

My iPhone informs me that it’s 19° F outside (-7 °C): positively tropical! Meanwhile in Dobrazyn, Hili is contemplating a swat, for apparently Sarah waved her hand to get Hili to assume a photogenic pose. She assumed the “pre-pounce” pose.

Hili: I’m looking for the right response.
A: To what?
Hili: To your aggressive hand waving.

(Photo: Sarah Lawson)
100_2815
In Polish:
Hili: Szukam właściwej odpowiedzi.
Ja: Na co?
Hili: Na twoje agresywne machanie ręką.(Zdjęcie: Sarah Lawson)

Leon’s mountain adventure: part quatre

February 20, 2015 • 4:00 pm

Leon the tabby is having a blast hiking in the snowy Polish mountains. When I asked how far this cat could actually walk in the snow, Malgorzata relayed my question to Elzbieta, Leon’s staff, and I have this answer:

Leon walked yesterday about 6 km. It took 1.5 hours. Then he demanded to be taken up.

That is amazing; I know of no other cat that would walk 6 km on a leash in the snow. And when Leon is “taken up”, he has a special compartment in Elzbieta’s backpack that is covered with a net so that he can see and breathe. Here’s his position in the backpack (I’m not sure if it’s worn in the front), with the net removed for better display of Leon. This picture was taken at my request:

Leon in backpack

Here are three more pictures of Leon’s Big Adventure, with the first having a monologue:

Leon: Now to the right and there is another kilometer to the hostel. Somebody has to be in charge of this expedition.

10997514_913534932000442_5801240216358842989_n

10997338_913536178666984_1872005131951949842_n

10653816_913535242000411_5963247067245224000_n

Thanks to Malgorzata for acting as an intermediary in Poland!

 

Red pandas frolic in the snow

February 20, 2015 • 3:25 pm

When I started graduate school, the red panda, Ailurus fulgens, was thought to be the closest living relative to the giant panda, mainly, I guess, because it sort of resembles the giant panda (both have a mask), lives in the same general area, and is arboreal, though it doesn’t eat bamboo.  In fact, it wasn’t even certain that the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleucans) was a bear, but that was settled with Vince Sarich’s aptly titled paper in Nature in 1973: “The giant panda is a bear.” (That’s one of the best paper titles I’ve ever seen.) Using immunological distances, Sarich showed that the giant panda was closely related to bears and much less closely related to red pandas or to the raccoon (the alternative theory, since raccoons also have masks).

We now know that the red panda (also insultingly called the “lesser panda”) is more closely related to weasels, raccoons, and skunks than to any bear, although it’s sufficiently unique to be the only species in its family (Ailuridae, though there’s some dispute about this, for higher-level classification is somewhat arbitrary). But here’s the phylogeny of several species showing the relationships I just described, as well as the approximate dates when the lineages diverged:

15_17MolecularPhylogeny-L copy

At any rate, the two species have another thing in common: both the greater and lesser pandas love to frolic in the snow. Here’s a recent video of red pandas having a high old time at the Cinncinnati Zoo:

h/t: Blue

Surprise! ISIS bans teaching evolution in schools

February 20, 2015 • 2:07 pm

This post is like telling people that Christians now worship Jesus. But I put it down for the record, for, after all, many Muslims accept evolution. It’s taught, for example, in Iranian public schools.

Nearly all devout Muslims, however, are human exceptionalists with respect to evolution: while they may accept other species of plants and animals as having evolved, humans are supposed to have been created directly by Allah. So it’s theoretically possible that ISIS could sanction the teaching of non-human evolution. But of course the chance of that happening is close to the chance of the Republicans enacting immigration reform in the U.S Congress.

At any rate, all we know about evolution and ISIS is this report from last September, detailing what ISIS decreed when it took over the Iraqui city of Mosul. As Talking Points Memo noted:

In Mosul, schools have been presented with a new set of rules, advertised in a two-page bulletin posted on mosques, in markets and on electricity poles. The statement, dated Sept. 5, cheered “good news of the establishment of the Islamic State Education Diwan by the caliph who seeks to eliminate ignorance, to spread religious sciences and to fight the decayed curriculum.”

The new Mosul curriculum, allegedly issued by al-Baghdadi himself, stresses that any reference to the republics of Iraq or Syria must be replaced with “Islamic State.” Pictures that violate its ultra-conservative interpretation of Islam will be ripped out of books. Anthems and lyrics that encourage love of country are now viewed as a show of “polytheism and blasphemy,” and are strictly banned.

The new curriculum even went so far as to explicitly ban Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution — although it was not previously taught in Iraqi schools.

That’s not much of a change, but the explicit ban means that ISIS, like some other Islamic countries, sees evolutionary biology as a threat to the faith. Other reforms include not just sex-segregated classes, but sex-segregated teachers, with men teaching boys and women teaching girls. And here’s some more changes:

The extremist-held Iraqi city of Mosul is set to usher in a new school year. But unlike years past, there will be no art or music. Classes about history, literature and Christianity have been “permanently annulled.”

The Islamic State group has declared patriotic songs blasphemous and ordered that certain pictures be torn out of textbooks.

God, what a soul-killer it must be to live in ISIS-controlled territory! It’s like North Korea without the starvation and fulsome worship of Dear Leader. There are no regimes that reject Enlightenment values more completely than the Islamic theocracies.

 

h/t: Gregory

I didn’t make Censor of the Year :-(

February 20, 2015 • 11:20 am

I was so pleased last year to be named the Discovery Institute’s “Censor of the Year” for 2013, recognizing my activities in deep-sixing the teaching of intelligent design at Ball State University. And I hoped I could make it two in a row; after all, we did get the principal of Lebanon High School to stop praying at graduation. But, it seems, the Discovery Institute likes to construe “censorship” as “censorship of teaching creationism.” And so, the recipient of the 2014 Censor of the Year award is. . . . . Neil deGrasse Tyson!

But why on earth Tyson? After all, he doesn’t engage in overt anti-creationist activities, and keeps a low profile about his unbelief. His gig is promoting science, and he’s good at it.

Well, the Discovery Institute appears to equate “promoting science” with “censoring creationism,” for here’s their award statement:

Neil deGrasse Tyson, of course, stands out this year for his command of the aptly named Ship of the Imagination, which he piloted through 13 episodes of the revived Carl Sagan science series, Cosmos. As we documented here at ENV and in a book, The Unofficial Guide to Cosmos: Fact and Fiction in Neil deGrasse Tyson’s Landmark Science Series, Cosmos represented a highly imaginative rewrite of the history of science. It was designed to convey an impression that faith was always an obstacle to scientific discovery, that all legitimate scientific controversies are in the past, that skeptics of scientific orthodoxy today are fools or worse.

Censorship can involve implied or explicit threats — that’s Jerry Coyne’s style, not Dr. Tyson’s. [JAC: Yay!!! I get a mention!] The charming, avuncular, facile Neil Tyson is effective, far more so than other nominees this year, because he is so very likable. As a censor, he works with an airbrush. Clearly produced with an audience of impressionable young people in mind, and no doubt on its way to becoming a staple in school science classrooms, Cosmos tells a seductive story that leaves out complications and controversies around science, and casts materialism as the obvious inference from the scientific data.

Tyson stands out, too, for his commanding cultural authority at the moment. He’s a star! What other television series can you think of that opened with an endorsement by the President of the United States?

. . . Tyson broadcast his photoshopped narrative of science to millions. That alone wins him our nod as 2015 Censor of the Year. He also stands out, though, for further dubious achievements. As others have documented, lead by Sean Davis at The Federalist, Neil Tyson is a fabulist. He’s been caught multiple times bending and stretching the truth in a variety of contexts.

Despite his confirmed slipperiness, his prestige as the popular face of science in America remains undimmed. He’ll go on to tell his distorted story again, and again, and again, you can be sure. Behold, our Censor of Year!

The “fabulist” stuff turns largely on a date that Tyson mixed up and a quote he attributed to George W. Bush, which Bush indeed did say, but not at the time that Tyson described. Tyson in fact clarified that issue in a Facebook post.  Have a look, and see if you think he’s a “fabulist.” And even if he were (and he’s not), fabulism is not “censorship.” What the Discovery Institute objects to is Tyson’s presentation of evolution, which left out the “controversies” about science (i.e., intelligent design creationism), and his reliance on “materialism” (i.e., he neglected God the Intelligent Designer). And he’s popular, too! That must really burn the Discovery Institute’s onions! None of those clowns will ever be as popular or as admired as Tyson! They’re a captious and dour lot, absent any charisma: can you imagine Bill Dembski hosting a television show?

Well, I’m sorry not to have won this year, but you have to hand it to Tyson: he’s in good company!