Saucy video

March 7, 2014 • 3:25 pm

It’s Friday afternoon, so, as Mehitabel the cat said, ‘Wotthehell.”  Reader Gunnar sent a link to this funny (and slightly salacious) video. Because of the last frame, it’s been characterized on other sites as a commercial for hair products; but some commenter say it’s from a UK television show called “Smack the Pony,” about which I know nothing. But that sounds about right given the voice-over laughter and applause.

Somehow I think the guy would be even more appealing when the “lump” is revealed as a cat!

Get the big pizza!

March 7, 2014 • 11:40 am

What size pizza should you order? The answer to that question is given in a February 26 post at the National Public Radio (NPR) website Planet Money: “74,476 reasons you should always get the bigger pizza” by Quoctrung Bui.  And that answer, as a moment’s thought will tell you (unless you’ve forgotten high-school geometry), reflects a simple fact: the area of a round pizza is proportional to the square of its radius, so a pizza that is twice the diameter of another has four times the area, and thus four times the nomming quantity. If it’s not four times as expensive, then, the better deal is the larger pizza.

Bui compiled the data on pizza prices throughout the country, showing the decline in price per square inch (we’re assuming, as is the case, that for a given pizza the depth is constant regardless of diameter); the graph at the NPR site also has a slider to show you how much you’re saving relative to a smaller pizza:

Screen shot 2014-03-07 at 12.24.21 PM

I did this calculation for one of my favorite pizzas, which happens to be purveyed only a few blocks from my crib: the Edwardo’s Special stuffed pizza from, of course, Edwardo’s. If you don’t know such a pizza, it has two crusts with oodles of filling in between, and (along with the deep-dish pizza) is a Chicago specialty that is not made properly anywhere else.

The Edwardo’s Special looks a bit like this, but with more veggies (onions, peppers, etc.)

09-wd0709-Chicago-Style-Stuffed-Pizza-2

This is not an Italian-style pizza, and I do like those, too, but if you’re the kind of snob whose only idea of pizza is a cracker with ketchup on top, and if you turn up your nose at the thought of tucking into the item shown above, then you’re a bad person who doesn’t like food.

But I digress. Here, from the Edwardo’s website, are two of my favorite stuffed pizzas with the sizes and prices. Below that I have calculated the price per square inch for the three different sizes of the Edwardo’s Special:

Screen shot 2014-03-07 at 7.49.01 AM

9″:  63.6 square inches; 30.2¢/square inch
11″: 95.0 square inches; 23.4¢/square inch
13″:  132.6 square inches: 19.0¢/square inch

Notice that the price per square inch is substantially higher than in the NPR graph, but that’s because this pizza is stuffed and not flat.  At any rate, you’re saving 37% per square inch if you get the largest rather than the smallest.

Why, then, should you ever order anything smaller than the largest pizza possible? I can see only two reasons. First, you’re impecunious and simply can’t afford a bigger one. (Note, though that the price difference for the pizza I’ve discussed is only  6 bucks between largest and smallest.)

Second, you can’t eat it all. But the second reason is not so good given that cold pizza (or even warmed-up pizza) is the most awesome breakfast in the world—second only to pie. If you’re a normal person, you will eat all of it eventually, even if you must take it home. Never in my life have I discarded pizza.

So remember the simple math next time you’re in the mood for a pizza: PIE ARE SQUARED.

h/t: Miss May

Only in America: Kentucky churches give away guns to bring men to Jesus

March 7, 2014 • 9:14 am

Don’t expect deep thoughts this week, for I’m struggling with recalcitrant book prose, and beyond that all I’m fit for is reporting on the lunacies of the world.  But this is a good one, for it combines all the best of America: guns and God.

The Louisville [Kentucky] Courier-Journal has an article this week whose title tells all: “Kentucky Baptists use gun giveaways to lure unchurched to Christ.” You couldn’t make that up, could you? And it’s just as bad as you think (there’s an amusing but also frightening video at the paper’s site):

In an effort its spokesman has described as “outreach to rednecks,” the Kentucky Baptist Convention is leading “Second Amendment Celebrations,” where churches around the state give away guns as door prizes to lure in nonbelievers in hopes of converting them to Christ.

As many as 1,000 people are expected at the next one, on Thursday at Lone Oak Baptist Church in Paducah, where they will be given a free steak dinner and the chance to win one of 25 handguns, long guns and shotguns.

The goal is to “point people to Christ,” the church says in a flier. Chuck McAlister, an ex-pastor, master storyteller and former Outdoor Channel hunting show host who presides at the events as the Kentucky Baptist Convention’s team leader for evangelism, said 1,678 men made “professions of faith” at about 50 such events last year, most of them in Kentucky.

In Louisville, he said, more than 500 people showed up on a snowy January day for a gun giveaway at Highview Baptist Church, and 61 made decisions to seek salvation.

McAlister’s boss, Paul Chitwood, the Kentucky Baptist Convention’s executive director, said such results speak for themselves. “It’s been very effective,” he said in an interview.

One of the giveaways was near Murray, Kentucky, where I spoke at Murray State not too long ago. Here’s one of the lucky converts there:

bilde
Danny Phillips, 69, of Murray, looks at his new Savage 17HMR rifle that he won during the Poplar Spring Baptist Church wildlife dinner at the church near Murray, Saturday, Feb. 22, 2014. The church gave away four long-guns, a bow, a deer stand and fishing equipment. Kentucky Baptist Convention’s Charles McAlister spoke during the event. (photo by Stephen Lance Dennee)

They do, however, interview other pastors and laypeople who think this guns-for-Jesus gambit is a travesty, which it is. It makes me ashamed to be an American.  When I feel this way, I remember H. L. Mencken’s quote from The American Mercury:

QUESTION: If you find so much that is unworthy of reverence in the United States, why do you live here?

Answer: Why do men go to zoos?

Some of the funnier quotes from the Courier-Journal piece:

  • “The day of hanging a banner in front of your church and saying you’re having a revival and expecting the community to show up is over,” said McAlister, who hosted the religious-themed “Adventure Bound Outdoors” on the Outdoor Channel for 16 years.“You have to know the hook that will attract people, and hunting is huge in Kentucky,” he said. “So we get in there and burp and scratch and talk about the right to bear arms and that stuff.”
  • Asked what Jesus would think of the gun giveaways, McAlister said, “I don’t know, but he was pretty handy with the whip when he ran the money-changers out of the temple.”
  • A Baptist church in Oakwood, Ga., last year gave away .22-caliber rifles at services to attract men who don’t think going to church is “manly,” its pastor said, according to news accounts.But Chitwood said McAlister came up with the idea of focusing the events on the hot-button right to bear arms, and McAlister said it was his idea as well to give away firearms in larger quantities.“We have found that the number of unchurched men who will show up will be in direct proportion to the number of guns you give away,” McAlister said.

Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!

jesus-gun-wwjd41-420x348

h/t: Barry

Good news: belief in God and the supernatural appears to wane

March 7, 2014 • 6:24 am

The results from a recent Harris Interactive Poll, taken in November of 2013 and published a month later, show a continual decline in Americans’ belief in the supernatural, which I take to be part of the inevitable secularization of this country. The sample size was 2250 adults over age 18, the poll gives no error limits on its estimates as it’s impossible to gauge error on issues like the beliefs of who didn’t respond, the wording of questions, and so on.

The good news, as I said, is that belief in things numinous and supernatural is on the wane; the bad news is that belief in religious superstition still far exceeds the acceptance of evolution.

Here’s the critical data: belief in evolution and the supernatural and paranormal between 2005 and the end of 2013. As usual, belief in things like miracles and the afterlife, as well as angels, hovers around 70%, but, as you’ll see in the last column, the percentage accepting such phenomena has dropped appreciably since 2005, with belief in God alone declining 8% in the last 8 years. If that trend continues, America should be completely atheistic by 2088! That won’t happen, of course, but note that most of the drop happened within the last four years.  (Because of that, one has to wonder if the new figures are somehow anomalous).

Picture 3

Acceptance of evolution has risen 5%, while that of creationism has declined by 3%; and acceptance of most paranormal phenomena, while showing a slight increase, is still appreciably below that of religious “supernatural” phenomena. Still, it’s a bit discomfiting that 42% of Americans still believe in ghosts!

Take a look at this table about degree of certainty that there is or is not a god; figures involve four polls over ten years.

Screen shot 2014-03-07 at 6.35.42 AM

Absolute certainty of God has gone down 11%, and if you cound the last three rows as “atheists/agnostics,” that figure has risen from 21% to 32%—a remarkable 52% increase in 10 years.

That secularism mirrors the change in people’s self-description, in which the “not at all religious” category has increased from 12% to 23% since 2007:

Screen shot 2014-03-07 at 6.40.03 AM

As expected, the South is more religious than other areas of the country, and Republicans are more religious than Democrats:

Screen shot 2014-03-07 at 6.42.00 AM Screen shot 2014-03-07 at 6.42.19 AM

Add to this table a partition by age (below), and you’ll see a steady increase in religiosity with age of respondent. This suggests a “cohort effect”: older people were more often brought up religious and have retained those beliefs. But there’s an alternative explanation: older people become more religious as they get older. I don’t have the data at hand, but I think that evidence from other polls, as well as from this one—the cross-section of Americans shows a general decline in religiosity, although the mean age is likely to be similar among all polls—suggests that some of this is a general decrease in religiosity in more recent years.

Remember, these data are percentages of people certain that there is a God:

Screen shot 2014-03-07 at 6.52.21 AM

In contrast, scientists working at “elite” universities show the opposite trend (this is from other data I’ve discussed): older scientists become less religious. That cannot reflect either a cohort effect or more belief with age, but, I suspect, reflects a steady erosion of belief the longer one works in science.

As always, religiosity declines with education, probably for the same reasons that scientists lose faith when they get older: with more education comes more ability or exposure to critical thinking. An alternative explanation, which I find less credible, is that people who are more religious at the outset tend to leave school earlier:

Screen shot 2014-03-07 at 6.52.30 AM

There are other interesting data in the poll, including what Americans think about God’s gender, but I’ll let you look for yourselves.

One figure did surprise me, though: the percentage of people who think God concerns himself (herself or hirself or zeself or whatever) with what happens on Earth:

Screen shot 2014-03-07 at 6.59.00 AM Screen shot 2014-03-07 at 6.59.21 AM

I’m trying to comport this with my observation (personal, of course) that most religious Americans are theistic, believing in an interactive God. The figures above, however, suggest that more Americans are deists (“does not control what happens on Earth”) rather than theists, though the most striking figure is in the last row—nonbelievers.

At any rate, perhaps theism is more than simply God’s “control” of what happens on earth, but can also involve God’s “interaction” with Earth’s inhabitants. That is, theists might not believe that God changes things, but still has a meaningful dialogue  with and a personal interest in believers. Still, the 29% of all adults who believe in a non-active God is a puzzle to me. Perhaps the question could have been worded better.

If one can trust these results, they document the increasing secularization of America—a secularization more rapid than I would have expected. Perhaps one happy day we’ll be like Denmark!

Friday: Hili dialogue

March 7, 2014 • 3:59 am

Hili: Some corrections demand extraordinary concentration.
A: So, maybe, it would be better to get help of an expert?
Hili: No, I enjoy my own mastery of the subject.

1964879_10202894781997886_1850773302_n

In Polish:

Hili: Pewne poprawki wymagają niesłychanej koncentracji.
Ja: To może lepiej zwrócić się z prośbą o pomoc do fachowca?
Hili: Nie, cieszy mnie moje własne mistrzostwo.

Jerry Coyne is getting bigger and handsomer

March 6, 2014 • 2:27 pm

Reader Gayle Ferguson, who adopted a litter of five kittens, including only one male (a ginger tom she called Jerry Coyne), sends pictures and news of Jerry and his littermates:

I’ve attached many new photos of the little man.  He is growing very handsome.  I haven’t had him weighed for a while but we’ll be going to the vet either tomorrow or Saturday to get this done.

Two pictures of Jerry and Hoover (so named because she sucked on her milk syringe with great vigor):

Hoover and jerry 2

Hoover and Jerry

Jerry on display:

IMG_2665

IMG_2680

IMG_2695

IMG_2701

IMG_2711

Hoover, Jerry, and Isis (Jerry’s girlfriend):

Isis Hoover and Jerry

Jerry, Molly, and Poppy:

Jerry Molly and Poppy

Jerry and Pistorius!:

Kitten and Pistorius

Gayle’s favorite picture of Jerry:

This is my favourite

Will some Kiwi or Aussie PLEASE adopt this guy? I want to be able to post pictures of him as he grows into an adult. (It goes without saying that you can’t change his name.)

I’ve enlarged Jerry Coyne’s “Satan Face” which is now my Twi**er icon:

Jerry

Pope Francis shows his true colors

March 6, 2014 • 11:54 am

The whole world, it seems—and that includes many unbelievers—have worked themselves into a frenzy of adoration toward Pope Francis. He’s such a humble man, they say, and he wears regular shoes! He lives in a tiny apartment instead of the fancy Vatican digs of his predecessor.

Those people were always fooling themselves, for the Pope must uphold one of the world’s most autocratic (and harmful) faiths, and he wouldn’t be Pope if he were going to fundamentally change Church dogma.

Sure enough, as reported by the BBC today, Pope Francis is reacting to the UN’s report (which faults the Church strongly and urges immediate action to root out sexual deviants from the clergy), with anything but humility.

Pope Francis has strongly defended the Roman Catholic Church’s record on tackling sexual abuse by priests.

In a rare interview with an Italian newspaper, the Pope said “no-one else has done more” to root out paedophilia.

He said the Church had acted with transparency and responsibility, yet it was the only institution to have been attacked.

And who else was supposed to be attacked?

In his interview with Corriere della Sera published on Wednesday, Pope Francis said: “The Catholic Church is perhaps the only public institution to have acted with transparency and responsibility.

“No-one else has done more. Yet the Church is the only one to have been attacked.”

The Pope, who will celebrate his first anniversary of his election later this month, also praised his predecessor, Emeritus Pope Benedict XVI, for changing the Church’s attitude towards predatory priests, saying he had been “very courageous”.

He also questioned the focus of the debate, saying: “The statistics on the phenomenon of violence against children are shocking, but they also clearly show that the great majority of abuses are carried out in family or neighbourhood environments.”

What kind of statement is that? That Church had institutionalized pedophilia, knew of the problem, tried to sweep it under the rug, and was called out for it. And the Pope tells us: “It’s not that bad: after all, more child abuse occurs outside the church than within it.” Is that supposed to absolve his Church of responsibility? It’s the worst possible thing he could have said, and it’s dripping with arrogance and insouciance.

“The Pope may make this statement, but then the Vatican doesn’t reply to the UN or impose the obligation that bishops should denounce accused priests in the courts and not deal with the cases internally.”

The founder of the US-based website, BishopAccountability.org, Terence McKiernan, was more direct in his criticism, complaining that the Pope had not merely failed to apologise to the children who had been abused but had not even expressed sorrow.

“It is astonishing, at this late date, that Pope Francis would recycle such tired and defensive rhetoric,” he said.

Meet the new Pope—same as the old Pope.

More mothy mimicry

March 6, 2014 • 11:09 am

This photo may have been staged to accentuate the mimicry of this buff-tip moth (Phalara bucephala), but there’s little doubt that it evolved to resemble a broken twig. It’s another remarkable case of the efficacy of natural selection. Note how its head (a feature that birds often look for) is appressed to the twig to make the moth even more inconspicuous.

634386

The moth, by the way, is European, and the picture comes from a Russian website that I can’t translate, and is courtesy of reader Jim E.