Two cartoons on cats and heaven

April 10, 2014 • 12:35 pm

From Scott Hilbrum’s comic The Argyle Sweater (via reader Mark), we see an outcome neglected in Pascal’s Wager:

tas140409

It’s not just rodents who should worry. . .

And reader Al sent this cartoon whose point is familiar to all cat owners. I can’t find the source, but perhaps some reader can name the artist and post a link.

how_cats_get_9_lives~

 

David Cameron claims that he and the Tories are “doing God’s work”

April 10, 2014 • 9:54 am

Presented without comment, from The Independent:

David Cameron has claimed divine inspiration was at work when it came to drafting a key concept for Conservative Party policy.

Speaking last night at his Easter reception in Downing Street, the Prime Minister reportedly said he was simply doing God’s work when he launched the “Big Society” initiative of volunteering and civic responsibility.

“Jesus invented the Big Society 2,000 years ago,” Mr Cameron said. “I just want to see more of it.”

. . . He went further than any recent prime minister in speaking publicly about his faith, according to the Daily Mail, and took the opportunity to offer his support to Britain’s Christian community.

“It is the case that Christians are now the most persecuted religion around the world,” Mr Cameron said. “We should stand up against persecution of Christians and other faith groups wherever and whenever we can.”

And offering his services to help the Church keep up its commitments to Jesus’s Big Society concept, he a little bizarrely compared himself to a company that unblocks drains.

“If there are things that are stopping you from doing more, think of me as a giant Dyno-Rod,” he said.

Mr Cameron faced a backlash from his own Conservative Party MPs yesterday over the way he handled Ms Miller’s resignation.

Speaking after the soprano at the reception had finished her rather apt choice of hymn last night, the Prime Minister said: “The Bible tells us to bear one another’s burdens. After the day I’ve had, I’m definitely looking for volunteers.”

A giant Dyno-Rod? Really? Does this kind of Jesus-y stuff go down well in the UK? And Christians are persecuted? (Well, maybe in Islamic countries, but where else?). After all, the official religion of the UK is a Christian one.

h/t: Chris

UPDATE:

Twitter is having fun with the #CameronJesus hashtag

cameronjesus

Muslims shut down university screenings of film about Islam and women

April 10, 2014 • 7:36 am

American colleges, it seems, are hardly bastions of free speech, a thesis eloquently documented on the website of FIRE, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and in the book Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship and the End of Debate, by FIRE founder Greg Lukianoff .(I have a spare copy which I’ll soon offer as a prize in a contest, but this book is mandatory reading for free-speech advocates).

We’ve already seen this with the revocation of Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s honorary degree at Brandeis (shame be upon them) this week.  Now we have yet another example of campuses caving into to Muslim threats, and in some ways it’s even worse.

There’s a new film, “Honor Diaries”, in which Muslim women speak out against the oppression of women endemic to their faith.  The description is here, and I’ll give an excerpt:

The film gives a platform to exclusively female voices and seeks to expose the paralyzing political correctness that prevents many from identifying, understanding and addressing this international human rights disaster.  Freedom of movement, the right to education, forced marriage, and female genital mutilation are some of the systematic abuses explored in depth.

Spurred by the Arab Spring, women who were once silent are starting to speak out about gender inequality and are bringing visibility to a long history of oppression. This project draws together leading women’s rights activists and provides a platform where their voices can be heard and serves as inspiration to motivate others to speak out.

It was scheduled to be screened on two campuses: the University of Michigan at Dearborn and the University of Illinois in Chicago. The results were almost predictable. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)—the same group that complained to Brandeis University—protested that the film was “Islamophobic”, and the two school duly canceled the screenings.

FOX News reports: (sadly, it is to such conservative venues we must turn to for this kind of information):

CAIR started a Twitter campaign a few days ago against the film, calling it ‘Islamophobic,’ the term groups such as CAIR use not to mean prejudice or fear against the religion, but a fabricated term used to denote anything unflattering to Islam.

It’s a tactic used by CAIR and others to successfully and often indefinitely quiet any criticism of Islam, even when it’s shining light upon the practice of honor violence and depriving young women of education, two central themes in the film.

This films is about genital mutilation, honor killing, and forced marriage of underage girls—as well as other misogynistic practices in many Islamic countries. It features nine Muslim women discussing and decrying such practices. And still, an American group of Muslims bays and whines, for they don’t want the dark side of their faith exposed.

This scenario is all too familiar, and we must stop giving in to that kind of pressure. College and universities, sadly, are even less open to such views than America in general, as Lukianoff documents in his book. Wedded to political correctness, American universities are all to ready to bow to ridiculous accusations of “Islamophobia.” How can Muslim women be Islamophobic.” They’re afraid of the trouble Muslims could cause if their feelings are hurt.

One of the women in the film, the eloquent activist Qanta Ahmed, a self-described “observant Muslim” and a physician in New York, speaks out against the canceling of the film:

With this act of censorship, the movie has become a metaphor for its message. Just like the women and girls it portrays, the movie has been silenced and its progenitors shamed.

While honor crimes take place in many cultures, they are most prevalent today in the Muslim-majority world and increasingly in Muslim diaspora communities settled in the West. Our movie examines the work of nine women activists, many of them Muslim, in defending and rescuing these victims.

 As an observant Muslim who has lived in Saudi Arabia, the center of the Muslim-majority world, as a woman of Pakistani heritage, and as a female physician who has identified and reported both adult and child victims of abuse, I contributed to the expert commentary in Honor Diaries, and did so willingly without compensation of any form. I did so in accordance with my values as a Muslim: We are mandated by Islam to expose any injustice, including among our own.

 Crying Islamophobia, and thus slandering the movie’s backers, Muslim groups have demanded that universities cancel these screenings. Contrast this with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia last weekend, where my colleague Dr. Maha Al-Muneef was honored by President Obama for the humanitarian work she as a Saudi Muslim physician has performed in exposing the abuse of women and girls in her own country — work that won first the admiration and later the patronage of the Saudi monarch himself. If a country as religiously restrictive and theocratic as Saudi Arabia can tolerate educational and social campaigns exposing the violence against women and girls, why in a country as robust as the United States are Muslim groups permitted to stifle public discourse in the academic sphere?

. . . American universities, especially vulnerable to accusations of discrimination or even marginalization, are easily frightened and persuaded to do the bidding of entrenched political Islamists.

. . .True to their core Islamist — not Islamic — values, they seek to silence any examination of the deep-rooted plight of the most vulnerable in our own communities. Such examination would expose Islamist ideals as hollow and fundamentally misogynist. By crying Islamophobia, the critics marginalize women and girls, who are utterly dispensable when it comes to realizing the Islamist political vision.

Universities, of course, should be the strongest bastions of free speech, for that is where our youth learn the give-and-take of free discourse and how to weigh conflicting opinions. It’s shameful that these universities have bowed to the implicit threats of Muslims. Would they have cancelled films documenting the pedophilia of Catholic priests? I doubt it.

I have huge admiration for women like Ali and Ahmed (could someone please get them on the atheist/secularist speaker circuit?), who are, after all, endangering their lives by speaking out against the injustices of Islam. If you want to counteract this shameful censorship by American universities, the film has an Indiegogo campaign to support its screening throughout the U.S. You could do worse than donate a few bucks.

University of Michigan and University of Illinois—join Brandeis in the Dishonor Roll of Cowardice.

Readers’ wildlife photographs

April 10, 2014 • 6:00 am

We have not only Stephen Barnard again, but a new contributor (see below). Barnard sends photos of a female eagle and a pair of cinnamon teal. The bald eagle chicks may have hatched, but they aren’t visible yet.

His captions:

Mama eagle vigilant on the nest.

RT9A7088

 

Cinnamon Teal BIF. [JAC: I didn’t know what “BIF” meant, but there’s an explanation here.]

RT9A7183

 

Reader Ed Kroc sends photos of herons from the city of Vancouver:

Here are three pictures of a mated pair of Great Blue Herons (Ardea herodias) engaged in billing behaviour atop their nest. In the first photo, one of the pair opens its beak while the other arches back before stabbing his/her beak forward to clasp its partner’s. Their bills are tightly clasped in the second and third photos. It’s of course difficult not to anthropomorphize this behaviour, but nevertheless I have heard that it strengthens pair bonding. I watched this particular pair bill for 5-7 minutes, keeping each other’s beaks tightly clasped for 10-60 seconds at a time, then repeating the process.

Billing Herons 1

 

Billing Herons 2

I wonder if this is where the phrase “cooing and billing” comes from.

Billing Herons 3
True love!

Ed adds:

These are just one pair of maybe 50 or 60 at the famous urban heronry between the Stanley Park tennis courts and the Park Board Office building in Vancouver. In this small area alone there are at least 50 or 60 nests in ten or so tree tops. For some context, I’ve also attached a picture of the immediate area. 

Heronry

Thursday: Hili dialogue

April 10, 2014 • 5:36 am

Posting will be very thin today, as I have academic appointments all day and a seminar and dinner in the afternoon/evening. Talk among yourselves. 

A: Look, fiddler on the roof!
Hili: I can’t see him. Fitness has probably eaten him.

1530318_10203122912741012_5082800228437968829_n

in Polish:
Ja: Patrz, skrzypek na dachu.
Hili: Nie widzę, pewnie Fitness go zjadł.

 

Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s response, and how to contact Brandeis

April 9, 2014 • 1:45 pm

If you are one of the many people who are upset at Brandeis University’s withdrawal of an honorary degree from Ayaan Hirsi Ali, you can leave a message with the President, Fred Lawrence. He has a public Facebook page, on which I’ve left the following message (you have to “like” the page first). My message will probably be removed quickly , but perhaps if many people left messages, they’d get the message (note: as of a few minutes ago, my message was still there, along with others).

Screen shot 2014-04-09 at 1.20.35 PM

 His email address is also publiclawrence@brandeis.edu, and you can find a general email contact form (a box to fill in) here.

I’ll be sending emails later, but I must now prepare for a talk.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali has responded to the rescinding of her degree. Read her whole eloquent statement at the link, but here is an excerpt:

 I wish to dissociate myself from the university’s statement, which implies that I was in any way consulted about this decision. On the contrary, I was completely shocked when President Frederick Lawrence called me—just a few hours before issuing a public statement—to say that such a decision had been made.

. . . Having spent many months planning for me to speak to its students at Commencement, the university yesterday announced that it could not “overlook certain of my past statements,” which it had not previously been aware of. Yet my critics have long specialized in selective quotation – lines from interviews taken out of context – designed to misrepresent me and my work. It is scarcely credible that Brandeis did not know this when they initially offered me the degree.

What was initially intended as an honor has now devolved into a moment of shaming. Yet the slur on my reputation is not the worst aspect of this episode. More deplorable is that an institution set up on the basis of religious freedom should today so deeply betray its own founding principles. The “spirit of free expression” referred to in the Brandeis statement has been stifled here, as my critics have achieved their objective of preventing me from addressing the graduating Class of 2014. Neither Brandeis nor my critics knew or even inquired as to what I might say. They simply wanted me to be silenced. I regret that very much.

Not content with a public disavowal, Brandeis has invited me “to join us on campus in the future to engage in a dialogue about these important issues.” Sadly, in words and deeds, the university has already spoken its piece. I have no wish to “engage” in such one-sided dialogue. I can only wish the Class of 2014 the best of luck—and hope that they will go forth to be better advocates for free expression and free thought than their alma mater.

Damn, did she deserve that degree! Brandeis’s behavior is reprehensible and cowardly. President Lawrence, are you not ashamed of your university?

I couldn’t resist posting this comment, from a Brandeis graduate, that appeared on President Lawrence’s page. I don’t know who Sam Hilt is, but good for him!

Screen shot 2014-04-09 at 2.38.07 PM