15 thoughts on “3.1415926

      1. No; you misunderstand me. The date here was 14.03.2016, not 03.14.2016, so it doesn’t work. We need standardization on this, really, as I never know when I see 05.03 whether we are talking about the third of March or the fifth of May these days!

        1. There is already standardisation in the form of ISO 8601

          In this format, 14th March would be written 2016-03-14. On the grounds that we want Pi day to happen every year, we should drop the year part giving 3-14 which means that today is indeed…

          … -11 day which is not as close as 3/14 (or approximately 0.21). For Pi day, we should standardise on British date format and the 22nd July, which we were taught in school is a good approximation (4 sig. figs.) and a relatively easy fraction to handle.

          I don’t know why US Central Time should be considered for the hours minutes and seconds part, I would have thought UTC would be better, which means that JAC was several hours late.

  1. I pointed out, last year, to over-eager celebrators that if they wanted to stop at 4 decimal places (3/14/’15), they really should wait a year, ie, until now. That 5 should’ve been rounded up to 6.

Comments are closed.