As far as I can see, Vatican City isn’t a member of the United Nations, but it’s been taken to task by the UN for covering up Church-related cases of sexual abuse. And the Vatican’s response was neither silence, stonewalling, nor even denial, but a ludicrous defense that it has no power to enforce priests’ behavior outside the confines of Vatican City. As the Associated Press reports in a piece picked up by many papers (here it’s USA Today, published Sept. 26):
The Vatican accused a U.N. human rights committee on Friday of sowing confusion and violating its own norms and the church’s religious freedom with a report into the Holy See’s record on child sexual abuse.
The Vatican released its formal response to a February report by the U.N. committee on the rights of the child. The committee monitors implementation of the key U.N. child rights treaty.
After publicly grilling the Holy See in a daylong hearing, the committee concluded that the Vatican maintained a “code of silence” that enabled priests to sexually abuse tens of thousands of children worldwide over decades with impunity.
You can see the UN’s report on the “Holy See” here. Besides the child abuse problem, the committee criticized the Vatican’s position on abortion, homosexuality, and women’s rights. The Vatican’s response? (my emphasis):
In its response, the Vatican complained that the committee “dismissed or ignored” the measures it had taken to combat abuse.
At the same time though, the Holy See insisted that it is only responsible for implementing the treaty in Vatican City, a tiny city state in the center of Rome.
Suggestions by the committee that it was responsible for implementing it in Catholic institutions around the world violates the concept of non-interference in the internal affairs of states and “offers a controversial new approach to ‘jurisdiction’ which clearly contradicts the general understanding of this concept in international law,” the Vatican said.
The “profundity of confusion” sown by the committee over jurisdiction “has led to a grave misunderstanding of the Holy See’s legal obligations under the convention,” the Vatican said.
That’s about as weaselly as you can get. The Church falls back on “legal obligations,” yet neglects the moral obligations that should certainly fall to an institution that sees itself as a beacon of moral leadership. And of course the Church can take action to prevent child abuse, for every priest is ultimately responsible to Rome.
As for changes in abortion, forget it:
[The Vatican] accused the committee of having made “fundamentally flawed” interpretations of the church’s legal system and of making a “completely unacceptable” recommendation that the Holy See change its law on abortion. The committee had urged the Vatican to identify circumstances when abortion services could be permitted, such as to save the life of a pregnant young girl.
One would think that, given all the trouble in Ireland and elsewhere about women in medical distress being refused abortions by Catholic hospitals, the Church might rethink its policy. But of course its policy comes from God, and is therefore unchangeable. Abortion is murder, even if it’s needed to save the life of the mother or if a fetus results from rape or incest. Is there any Christian organization more odious than Catholicism?
Thanks, Pope Francis.