A New Yorker evolution-cartoon contest

April 23, 2018 • 3:15 pm

In a recent post on The New Yorker, several readers beefed that they no longer like the cartoons. Well, I still like most of them, and always read the cartoon contest on the magazine’s last page, where an artist submits a cartoon drawing without a caption; readers submit their own caption, and the editors pick three of the best. The next week the winning caption is announced.

Reader Mark sent this one, but I don’t know if it’s new. He says the last caption is the best. Judge for yourself—and invent your own caption if you wish, though it’s too late to enter the competition.

Cunk on Britain: Episode 3

April 23, 2018 • 2:00 pm

I believe I’ve posted the first two episodes of Cunk on Britain, Diane Morgan’s very funny take of the history of Old Blighty. I’m surprised that the episodes are still up (#1 here and #2 here), as the BBC tends to take these things down. Well, watch them soon.

This episode covers the nineteenth century, and there are some real gems. There’s of course a bit on Darwin (from 12:49 to 15:25).  You get to hear Philomena say her best word, “monkey” (pronounced “mahn-kee”), five times, and hear her description of Darwin’s classic book The Oranges of the Peaches.

h/t: Julian

New York Times cries “fake news” about real news from Palestine

April 23, 2018 • 12:00 pm

You may remember the reporter and anchor Campbell Brown, who worked for NBC and then CNN before the latter dropped her for low ratings (I liked her reporting). She then took to writing op-eds and turned herself into a well-known advocate for school choice, becoming more openly conservative along the way.

Now, as Nellie Bowles just reported in the New York Times (click on screenshot below), Brown was hired last year by Facebook to act as a media liaison and fix the company’s tarnished reputation as a purveyor of news.

One of the projects in which Brown is engaged is producing news shows for Facebook alone—shows featuring name anchors. I don’t know whether this is wise, or will succeed if it’s tried, but at any rate this post is not to criticize Brown, but rather Nellie Bowles and the New York Times.  For in her article, Bowles holds up as “fake news” the report that the Palestinian government pays terrorists for killing Israelis, both civilians and soldiers. Here’s what she says (my emphasis):

Facebook — with its reach of more than 2.2 billion users — already holds enormous power over the news that people consume. But now it is making its first venture into licensed news content. Facebook has set aside a $90 million budget to have partners develop original news programming, and Ms. Brown is pitching publishers on making Facebook-specific news shows featuring mainstream anchors, according to two people involved in or briefed on the matter, who asked not to be identified because the details were confidential.

Once those shows get started, Ms. Brown wants to use Facebook’s existing Watch product — a service introduced in 2017 as a premium product with more curation that has nonetheless been flooded with far-right conspiracy programming like “Palestinians Pay $400 million Pensions For Terrorist Families” — to be a breaking news destination. The result would be something akin to an online competitor to cable news.

As Tablet magazine points out in two pieces (here and here), however, this is not fake news or a “far-right conspiracy theory, but is in fact true. It’s well known to anybody who even knows a bit about this situation (the figures are publicly available) that the Palestinian Authority (PA) pays stipends not only to Palestinian terrorists who are convicted and languish in Israeli jails (the money goes to their families), but also to families of “martyrs” who kill Israelis—both soldiers and civilians. Here’s some information from the two Tablet pieces, which also notes that the PA budgeted $403 million for this purpose in 2018:

Every year, the PA has released a similar sum, roughly over one billion shekels (approx. $320 million dollars) per year for the past four years. I’m only providing the past four years as an example, but if we went back further, we would see that the number has also been higher than one billion. Due to international pressure, the Palestinian Authority decided that it was unable to directly pay the money, and so from its budget, through a trick that satisfied many international entities, they transferred the money, not directly to a ministry responsible for payments to prisoners, but to the PLO so that the terrorists’ salaries could be formally paid through Palestinian National Fund, which was declared afterward by the Israeli Ministry of Defense to be a terror-supporting organization. But this money all comes from the Palestinian Authority’s own budget.

The PA’s official support of terror is a deliberate and official act of state: It occurs on the basis of PA laws that have been passed since 2004, and provide legal grounds for payments to incarcerated terrorists and the families of Terrorist killed carrying out terror attacks against Israel. These are explicit PA laws, which mandate payments to prisoners of war, or as they call them “al-asra”; a normal prisoner is “sijir” in Arabic. “Prisoners of war and released prisoners of war,” says the second clause of the law,“are an inseparable part from the fighting sector of Palestinian society.” On that basis, the PA has determines that Palestinian terrorists are entitled to “heroic treatment and recognition.”

I’m appalled that the New York Times (which I see as becoming increasingly authoritarian Leftist) would impugn a fact as a “conspiracy theory”. If you don’t believe the Tablet, do some Internet digging yourself.

And, by the way, these payments are illegal under international law. But of course Western media, committed to its narrative, chooses not to mention this.  Only one country in the Middle East is repeatedly accused of violating international law. But you won’t find Israel paying IDF soldier, or anyone else, a bonus for killing Palestinians. From the Tablet:

. . . Palestinian payments to terrorists and the families of terrorists who died carrying out terror attacks stand in complete contravention to all signed agreements in the Oslo Accords, and they stand in complete contravention to international law. The problem is that until now the international community and Israel have willfully overlooked the problem of the Palestinian Authority terror payments. There is a fear in Israel and abroad that if Israel or the West acted against these payments that the PA would collapse, resulting in even greater security chaos. In addition, the international community has excused these payments by defining them as social welfare payments to families, and not as to what they really are, rewards for terrorism, and incentives to commit future terror attacks.

h/t: Malgorzata

New Mexico: Santa Fe 2

April 23, 2018 • 9:30 am

I spent two nights in Santa Fe as there’s so much to see and do—and eat. People watching is fun, too, as the town harbors a mix of wealthy locals, aged tourists, and aged hippies, as well as a “woo” culture (see below). The food is good, too, though I’m trying to restrain myself: no more than two meals a day.

Here are a few holiday snaps from Day 2:

This is the New Mexico Museum of Art, right off the central plaza. I didn’t go in, as I feared I would eat up the whole lovely day looking at their collection of 20,000 pieces. It’s got a good reputation, and is New Mexico’s oldest art museum.

It was Saturday, so things were hopping: it was market day, when the local Native Americans come to town to sell their arts and crafts, including jewelry, blankets, and assorted lovely items. The vendors line the arcade along the Palace of Governors.  I didn’t buy anything (I already have too much stuff), but I greatly admired a handmade obsidian knife with a deerhorn handle made by a nice guy who chatted with me. I didn’t photograph it (I should have), and anyway it was $450: a piece of art, not cutlery.

I noticed that the obelisk in the center of the Plaza, a memorial to the settlers of the state who died while killing off the locals, had been defaced, with a word missing and another one written in:

I asked a tour guide who was leading a group around what word had been there before. He said the word was “savage”, and that one day, in broad daylight, a guy (I think a Native American, but am not sure) walked up to the monument and hacked off the missing word. I don’t blame him, as the indigenous people were no more “savage”—and probably less so—than those who displaced and killed them. I think someone else wrote “resilient” later. The story of the destruction of the indigenous peoples is a sad one, and this graffiti is just one form of reparation.

There’s a newer plaque on the other side of the monument that tries to make amends for the old, offensive words. This is one correction I don’t mind:

Tourists. I was surprised that many of them were older, but maybe they are “snowbirds” who come here to escape the chill of the north:

Jewelry for sale. If you like Native American style turquoise, this is paradise, but prices are, I suspect, very high:

A lovely piece of greenish turquoise (Wikipedia has a nice article on the gemstone, noting that it’s been debased in recent years by artificial coloration, synthetic “stones”, and imitations.)

There is woo in town. I went into one rock and mineral shop (I’m a sucker for rock and fossil shops) and noticed that, in the rear, they were selling “gemstone water”, water in which gemstones are placed, conferring on the liquid a “healing power”. Pure bullshit, of course.

And here’s some other woo.  I’m sure that some of the warm drinks are okay, though without medicinal properties, but what on earth is Belly Bless™? Note the crystal- and aromatherapy.

But I also found four instantiations of my Spirit Animal. The first one is particularly lovely (notice the baby):

Kitty?

Two pumas outside an antique store:

The San Miguel Chapel (also called the “San Miguel Mission”) near downtown may be the oldest church in the United States. The adobe church was, according to its website, built between 1610 and 1626, but has been damaged and rebuilt several times since then. However, the original adobe walls are still largely there under the newer stucco. (Adobe is a building material made of mud, straw, and sometimes manure, that’s dried in the sun and used as large bricks. It’s fairly durable in dry climates, but requires attention and repair even then.)

I love the adobe houses and churches of the Southwest; I’ll show more on a Taos post later, as it’s the stuff from which the Native American pueblos are made. Here’s San Miguel:

Many of these churches were built using Native American slave labor under the direction of Spanish Catholic missionaries.

Across the street is what is reputed to be America’s oldest house: the De Vargas Street House, whose age is in fact unknown, but probably was built in the 17th or early 18th centuries. Well, who knows, but it’s a lovely adobe structure that you can enter and photograph. Here’s the outside and a reconstruction of the inside (it actually once had two stories). You can see the adobe bricks where the stucco coating is gone:

Finally, my second and last meal of the day (I did have a salted caramel milkshake as a pre-bed snack). I wasn’t hungry till about 3 pm because I’d had that huge breakfast of blue cornmeal pancakes with pinon nuts, butter, and syrup, which stayed with me for hours.

A nice woman at the tourist office recommended lunch at one of her favorite places near downtown, Del Charro’s, which has good draft beer and decent local cuisine. I had the blue corn chicken enchiladas, washed down with a superb local red craft ale, not too hoppy. (I deplore the tendency of brewers to overhop their beer in America, almost as if they’re in a contest to make the bitterest one-note ale.) This is a record day for me: I had blue corn food for both breakfast and lunch.

Tomorrow (or when I get a chance): a visit to lovely Taos.

Monday: Hili dialogue

April 23, 2018 • 6:30 am

By Grania

Good morning, and welcome to the new week!

Today is the anniversary of New Coke (1985), the sugary abomination created by Coca-cola in attempt to be more like Pepsi’s sweeter beverage.

In 2005 the very first Youtube video was uploaded by Jawed Karim (a co-founder of the platform).
It’s not the most profound 19 seconds ever recorded, but it was an important step towards the democratization of video publishing. Well, before Google went and ruined it all.

Here’s an interesting photo. Nancy Reagan looks like she really wants to be somewhere else.

Cat attack imminent.

This cat on the other hand, well, who knows.

Interspecies love

An interesting display of interspecies solidarity, well, except for the orcas who are ruining their reputation.

Finally, over to Poland where Hili seems to have stumbled upon a secret that has probably won more than one White House candidate their term in office.

A: You’ve thrown down my pen, again.
Hili: Audacter calumniare, semper aliquid haeret.

In Polish:

Ja: Znowu zrzuciłaś mój długopis.
Hili: Audacter calumniare, semper aliquid haeret.

The Latin: “Slander boldly, something always sticks”.

Hat-tip: Tina and Matthew

The effect of helicopter parents on their kids

April 22, 2018 • 1:30 pm

“Helicopter parenting” refers to parents who incessantly hover like a helicopter around their kids.  Some have blamed this style of parenting on the palpable entitlement felt and exercised by this generation of college students. Reader Brian called my attention to this short (2-minute) video from the Atlantic, one of a series on parenting. The Atlantic gives some background:

“Initially, helicopter parenting appears to work,” says Julie Lythcott-Haims, author of How to Raise an Adult. “As a kid, you’re kept safe, you’re given direction, and you might get a better grade because the parent is arguing with the teacher.” But, ultimately, parents end up getting in the child’s way. In the first episode of Home SchoolThe Atlantic’s new animated series on parenting, Lythcott-Haims explains how helicopter parenting strips children of agency and the ability to cultivate their own tools to navigate the world. “Our job as parents is—like it or not—to put ourselves out of a job,” she says.

This episode of Home School was produced by Elyse Kelly.