Monday children’s literature

February 29, 2016 • 2:30 pm

Reader Dom works at a library and thus comes across all manner of interesting literature. This story, “The Cat and the Mouse”, comes from a 1912 book, A Second Reader for Deaf Children. Click to enlarge, and be sure to look at the pictures (especially the last one), and read the story (especially the last two sentences).

The cat and the mouse

And a taste, in both senses, of what’s to come: the elusive Montreal smoked meat sandwich (my dinner last night). I ate every morsel.

P1090676

Gad Saad on New Atheism, religion, the “regressive left”, trigger warnings, evolutionary psychology, safe spaces, and free speech

February 29, 2016 • 1:00 pm

It’s worth getting acquainted with both Dave Rubin and Gad Saad, and these two shortish videos give you the chance (they’re bits of a single one-hour video).

Dave Rubin is a comedian and talk-show host, best known to us nonbelievers as host of The Rubin Report (YouTube channel here), which is a good replacement for The Young Turks since the latter show went Full Leftist Authoritarian (I find it unwatchable; I’d rather listen to out-and-out conservatives like Bill O’Reilly!). Rubin has, in fact, been responsible for popularizing—and mocking—that group of identity politicians and Islam-apologists known as “The Regressive Left.” I prefer to call it the “Authoritarian Left” since not all their stands are regressive.

Saad, of Lebanese and Jewish origin, is an evolutionary psychologist and professor of marketing at Concordia University, right here in Montreal. He also has a widely read website, Homo Consumericus, at Psychology Today. His criticism of the Authoritarian Left, and his work on evolutionary psychology, are guaranteed to alienate the large section of the atheist blogosphere that rejects evo psych on purely ideological grounds while claiming that the entire field is scientifically worthless. Too bad—Saad’s a thoughtful and reasonable man, and I wish I had his equanimity. And it’s just dumb to reject wholesale the notion that while human morphology and physiology reflects our evolution, our behavior is an exception.

In the first video, Saad covers a lot of ground. For one thing, he goes after the dissimulator Reza Aslan, and wonders if Aslan knows he’s lying when he produces his “endless tsunami of nonsense.” He further considers whether there’s any difference between religiosity and lunacy, the connection between religion and sports, and whether religion that has no impact on the public sphere deserves criticism (i.e., is it injurious in any way to have unfounded religious belief on which you don’t act?). Finally, he tells us why religion will always be with us, and why “New Atheism” is demonized.

This second video, twelve minutes long, deals with evolutionary psychology, and why so many people are reluctant to give any credence to the notion that some of our behavior reflects natural selection that acted on our ancestors. Saad goes on to discuss what he calls “political correctness and the thought police,” and why their actions are harmful.

If you’d like to listen to Saad’s Ottawa lecture, “How political correctness limits the free exchange ideas on campus,” to which he refers in the video above, go here. I recommend it; Saad’s a very good speaker.

I think all of us are behooved to listen to those who oppose our views. How else can we critically examine our beliefs, or sharpen our arguments should we decide to retain them? But if you’re sick of The Young Turks or miscreants like Reza Aslan, Rubin’s show is a good palliative.

Ottawa: a visit to The Canadian Museum of Nature

February 29, 2016 • 11:15 am

While in Ottawa, I spent a couple of engrossing hours at The Canadian Museum of Nature. I don’t have a picture of the entire building (built around 1905), but here’s one from Wikipedia. The incongruous glass addition was put on between 2004 and 2010 to replace the original stone tower, whose weight was causing the building to settle into the local clay:

800px-Canadian_Museum_of_Nature_2

The building is festooned with Canadian-themed animals and decorations. Here’s a carved beaver, one of Canada’s two National Animals (the other is not a moose or a polar bear).

P1090603

A wolf carved on the staircase inside:

P1090604

And a moose-themed stained glass window:

P1090626

Our first stop was the ongoing insect exhibit, with both live and pinned insects. I of course favored the live ones, especially the series of giant beetles. I have no records of what these three are (they’re all huge), but I’m sure readers can identify them. They were all nomming too—and their food looked like banana.

P1090607

Another huge beetle with horns:

P1090610

And a big golden one. I have no scale for these, as they were in glass cases, but they were at least two inches long.

P1090609

The large creature below is a Malaysian jungle nymph (Heteropteryx dilatata). It’s famous for laying the largest eggs of any insect (up to half an inch long, or 1.3 cm), and Wikipedia adds this information:

Females reach a length of 25 centimetres (9.8 in), one of the world’s heaviest bugs, and the males a length of 10 centimetres (3.9 in). The females of this species are very aggressive and much larger, wider, and brighter-colored than the male. The female is lime green and has short, rounded wings, however their short length doesn’t allow them to fly. The males are much smaller and a mottled brown colour. Both sexes have small spikes on their upper bodies, more numerous in the female, who also has very large spines on her hind legs that can snap together as a scissor-like weapon.

This one is clearly a male.

P1090616

Here’s a female (from Wikipedia); note the spikes:

1024px-Malaysische_Gespensterschrecke

And both sexes; the sexual dimorphism is clear:

800px-Heteropteryx_dilatata_pair

Back to my photos: this one is of Mesohippus, one of the “transitional forms” in the evolution of horses. It lived 30-40 million years ago in what is now North America, and had three toes, having lost one from its ancestor. (Modern horses, of course, retain only the single toe, as the two side toes were lost.)

P1090621

Its relative size from the link above:

mesohippus-size

And a shot I took of the toes. You can see that they’re already reduced, and wind up as the “splint bones” on the side of the leg of modern horses.

P1090620

As I said, the toes became the split bones, a vestigial feature (prone to fracture and injury) attesting to modern horses’ descent from multi-toed ancestors:

89-093f1

On to whale evolution and the transitional forms. The Museum had a nice series showing whale evolution, and here’s one putative ancestor, Pakicetus, discovered and analyzed by Phil Gingerich and colleagues. It’s considered a “basal” cetacean because it has certain features of the ear found only in later and modern whales.

P1090628

Once thought to be semi-squatic, Pakicetus is now thought to have been largely terrestrial, perhaps spending a bit of time in the water. Here’s a reconstruction:

Pakicetus_BW

A bit later in whale evolution we get Ambulocetuswhich could clearly walk and swim. It’s thought to have been mostly aquatic, lurking like crocodiles in the shallows to strike animals on land. The rear limbs show modifications for movement in water:
P1090627

Here’s a reconstruction of Ambulocetus:

Ambulocetus_BW

The most recent fossil whale in the museum (beside the modern one shown below) is that of Dorudon, which was fully aquatic and lived about 40 million years ago. I didn’t take a photo of the entire fossil, but here are the rear legs, clearly vestigial (unconnected to the rest of the skeleton), but just as clearly the remnants of rear limbs:

P1090630

Here’s a skeleton from the Senckenberg Museum in Frankfurt am Main:

1024px-Dorudon_atrox_Senckenberg

And a reconstruction (from Wikipedia), showing the tiny rear limbs sticking out from the side. Modern whales have even smaller remnants of those limbs (see below):

Dorudon_BW

Here are all three stages of leg evolution in one shot, in chronological order starting from the bottom:

P1090629

Here’s a cool dinosaur fossil with head armor and spikes that point both backwards and forwards. I’m sure either Matthew (a dino aficionado) or a reader can identify it, as I’ve forgotten:

P1090623

Reconstruction of a feathered dinosaur, probably a theropod:

P1090624

And here’s a species that wasn’t a felid but shows convergent evolution with the “true” cats. I took a photo of the sign below so I could remember it:

P1090633

And here it is: Hoplophoneus, a member of the extinct family Nimravidae in the Carnivora. It was the size of a leopard and lived in North America about 35 million years ago. 

P1090634

A reconstruction of Hoplophoneus from Prehistoric Animals:

Hoplophoneus1

I was amused to find that the French word for “raccoon” (which of course is a New World mammal) is “washing rat”. It is not a rodent, but a procyonid.

P1090637

Finally, the Museum had an entire skeleton of a blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus), the heaviest animal known to have existed in all the history of life. It weighs about 180,000 kilograms (multiply by 2.2 to get pounds), or about 200 US tons. I photographed its vestigial limbs, which are unconnected to the rest of the skeleton:

P1090636

Next post: Canadian noms!

Readers’ wildlife photos

February 29, 2016 • 7:30 am

Today we have photos from a new contributor, Michelle Pearce. Her descriptions are indented:

Here is a small collection of photographs from a recent trip to Kenya and Rwanda.

Daisy, the Rothschild’s giraffe [Giraffa camelopardalis rothschildi], eating kibble with her long tongue. Taken at the Nairobi Giraffe Centre.

AEEE3A96-AC89-4268-B2D8-DBED00C44A30

The smallest baby elephant [Loxodonta africana] we saw. The male in the picture has had his tusks shortened because he used them to disable the electric fences. Taken in the North of Kenya.

FullSizeRender

A Grévy’s zebra [Equus grevyi]:

36320E55-B699-4EEF-870C-2E7006B99DB8

This mother and baby rhino [Diceros bicornis] were covered in mud and flies, surrounded by hungry egrets!

7242B190-174C-452C-BDA2-9FC860FA7DB2

This male cheetah [Acinonyx jubatus] was so full its belly practically dragged on the ground.

FullSizeRender

A Cape Buffalo (Syncerus caffer):

45D53F36-F507-4B7D-A944-677B7FBFAA3D

This lioness [Panthera leo] was part of a research programme. Her collar needed adjusting as it was getting too tight. She didn’t look unhappy though.

D9246B4F-DC8E-4148-B2EC-643975DE4780

7C9C03AF-7AF2-4EA1-ABDA-D68CEC842A8F

A leopard (Panthera pardus):

F07B236B-71A8-4315-9D8D-BC10F54F71BA

A mother and son.

ABE63107-3122-4B1E-9C21-AEE3C45011FF

Foot of a mountain gorilla [Gorilla beringei beringei]in Rwanda:

FullSizeRender-1

FullSizeRender

6859202D-140A-410B-A753-B6D9A4892A0A

Monday: Hili dialogue

February 29, 2016 • 6:30 am

It’s Leap Year Day! Google has a nice animated Doodle featuring bunnehs:

leap-year-2016-5690429188079616-hp

So what happened in history on February 29? Well, the Oscars were held in 1940, and Hattie McDaniel, who played “Mammy” in Gone with the Wind, became the first African American to win an Oscar: for Best Supporting Actress. (I note that the Oscars were last night, and Spotlight won the Best Picture Award. You saw it here [and here] first!) Also in 1940, as Wikipedia reports, “In a ceremony held in Berkeley, California, because of the war, physicist Ernest Lawrence receives the 1939 Nobel Prize in Physics from Sweden’s Consul General in San Francisco.” It’s a special day for Canadians, as, in 1980, “Gordie Howe of the then Hartford Whalers makes NHL history as he scores his 800th goal.”

What about births? Wikipedia reports (I’ll consider this reliable until Greg writes his long-delayed article on the problems with Wikipedia) that in many places a “leapling” (the name of someone born on February 29) is considered for legal purposes to have been born on March 1.  (Otherwise you couldn’t drink till you were 80!). And quite a few notables were leaplings, including Dinah Shore (1916), Howard Nemerov (1920), Hermione Lee (1948), and Ja Rule (1976). Those who died on this day included Ludwig I of Bavaria (is there a Canadian province of Beaveria?) in 1868, La Lupe (1992) and Davy Jones of the Monkees (2012). Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is showing evolution-based contrition:

A: Hili, there is a mouse on the verandah, killed by you!
Hili: I couldn’t eat it. I was looking at it and thinking about the three and a half billion years of the unbroken chain of life…

(Photo: Sarah Lawson)

J

In Polish:
Ja: Hili, na werandzie znowu jest zabita przez ciebie mysz!
Hili: Nie mogłam jej zjeść, patrzyłam na nią i myślałam o trzech i pół miliardach lat nieprzerwanego łańcucha życia…
(Zdjęcie: Sarah Lawson)

As lagniappe, here’s an affectionate serval (Leptailurus serval) from Facebook (click on screenshot to go there):

Screen Shot 2016-02-29 at 6.54.58 AM

Explore an alien world – now!

February 28, 2016 • 1:56 pm

by Matthew Cobb

If you click here you will be taken to the live feed of the NOAA Ocean Explorer Okeanos exploration of the deep sea off Hawaii. This is conducted by a remote-operated vehicle, with a video camera and lights, with the operators on the ship way above. There are geologists and marine biologists on line to discuss the things they can see. This is really like being on Mars, except there are animals! Right now they are 1.4 km down – they just came across a 1 metre-long eel!

Yesterday they were 4.3 km down and came across this unknown octopus that got everyone very excited!  Really, click and watch – this is fantastically exciting stuff.

 

Let’s ditch the “rich old white dude” trope—and similar slurs

February 28, 2016 • 1:30 pm

Cue Andy Rooney:

“You know what really bothers me? Hearing people and their opinions dismissed because they’re seen as ‘rich old white dudes.’ I see this everywhere on the Internet, especially from the Authoritarian Left. (That’s a term I learned from my friend Jerry Coyne.)

“Now the Left is supposed to be against racism, sexism, and ageism, yet, here we see all three combined, and used to silence—or denigrate—a group of people whose opinions are by no means homogeneous. I mean, Bernie Sanders is a rich old white dude, and the Koch Brothers are two rich old white dudes. Bill Gates is another rich old white dude, too: he’s recently turned sixty. Bill O’Reilly is a rich old white dude, but so is Bill Clinton: a very rich old white dude. What do they have in common besides a Y chromosome, a big bank account, white skin, and a certain age?

“And why does being ‘rich’ mean your opinion doesn’t count? Yes, many rich people are conservatives, but many are not. Many are philanthropists. Being rich isn’t itself a vice, it’s what you do with your money, and how you made it, that counts.

“What are labels like that used for? Simply to dismiss a class of people, and still their voices, because of the color of their skin, their age, their wealth, and their sex. This is exactly what we’re not supposed to be doing.

“And here’s another thing: the term ‘BernieBros,’ devised and used by Hillary Clinton’s campaign to imply that those who favored Bernie Sanders over Clinton were either sexists or misogynists. Never mind that there are gazillions of women who support Sanders. It’s not okay to use the term ‘BernieBros’, just as it would not be okay to use the term ‘HillaryChicks.’

“Now I suppose people might respond that the term is used to show that one group is dominating discourse in the media or on the Internet, and we need fewer of them. After all, it’s supposedly okay to ‘punch up’ like that. Well, there’s a case to be made for diversity (though now that we have the Internet, almost anyone can have a voice), but you make it not by smearing or denigrating an entire group, but by making reasoned arguments.

“By all means criticize the lack of minority voices on television, but don’t dismiss the opinions of people simply because they’re the wrong age, race, or sex. After all, being young, black, poor, or female doesn’t automatically make you right.

“So let’s stop the nonsense about ‘rich old white men,’ ‘BernieBros,’ and the like. When you use them, you’re practicing exactly the same kind of bigoted stereotyping that you, as a liberal, find despicable.”

abc_wn_andy_rooney_111026_wg