Readers’ beefs of the week

August 23, 2014 • 9:52 am

Actually, these have accumulated over two weeks, as I’ve been busy.   None have been posted; this is the detritus.

This comment, by reader “Tyler”, was directed to a Caturday felid: White lions post:

what the hell how can a creature so beautiful can be part of evoloution have u seen how complicated these beautiful animals r so how can you think that white lions are from evolution they r made from the lord God Jesus Christ…

Well, white lions aren’t any more complicated than normal lions, or mice, for that matter.  But someone this blinkered is immune to reason.

*****

Not long ago I posted about a diner in North Carolina that gave a discount to customers who prayed before their meals: “Restaurant gives discounts to customers praying in public“. Reader “td” didn’t like my attitude:

Get a restaurant to give discounts to anyone who says “god is not real” or anything blasphemous and mind your own business.

We are minding our own business, unlike those who give discounts to those who pray. People like the owner of Mary’s Diner in Winston-Salem are enforcing their religious sentiments on others. That’s against the law, by the way, “td.” And of course giving discounts to atheists is just as illegal as giving them to those who pray.

*****

Reader “Josephine Richardson,” who apparently runs the website evolutioniswrong.org, had her own theory for a biological observation I used in WEIT as evidence for evolution: the development of the vertebrate kidney. Her theory is quite amusing.

The kidneys of mammals like ourselves actually go through three stages during embryogenesis (these three stages are also seen in reptiles and birds). We begin with a pronephric kidney, which takes wastes out of the body cavity (coelom) and excretes them to the outside. In primitive fish like lampreys and hagfish, this is also the first kidney to form in embryos, and then continues on to form the adult kidney. In mammals, this kidney is, however, nonfunctional. So why does it form?

After another two weeks or so, the pronephric kidney is replaced by the embryonic mesonephric kidney, which takes wastes from the blood and excretes them to the outside through a pair of “Wolffian ducts.” This continues on to  form the adult kidney in fish and amphibians, but is replaced in the bird, reptile, and mammalian embryo by yet a third kidney: the metanephric kidney, a revamped organ that also removes wastes from the blood and exxretes them through a pair of ureters.

This known to pre-Darwinian embryologists, but was explainable only by evolution: mammals, reptiles, and birds evolved from earlier animals that had different kinds of kidneys.  Those kidneys still form in utero as vestigial remnants of the creatures’ ancestry (the mesonephros may have some excretory function in mammals, but the pronephros does not). Why would the creator operate this way, giving us three successive kidneys, one of which is of no use at all? The best explanation is simply that the succession of developmental stages reprises, transitorily, the genetic information of our ancestors, and in the temporal order in which that genetic information accumulated. (This is one example of “ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny,” a misunderstood concept that doesn’t always work—some stages simply don’t show up in embryos—but is sometimes seen, as in the development of kidneys.)

Another example I like to use of an embryological feature that is functionless, but serves as a marker of our ancestry, is the lanugo, a coat of hair that develops about 6 months into gestation in the human embryo, and then is shed before birth. There is of course no function for a hairy human fetus, as it’s already floating in warm fluid, and hair is useless in keeping us warm when we’re wet. The lanugo is simply a remnant of the coat of hair that our ancestors had when they were hairier primates. (Remember, we’re the only “naked ape.”) Other apes also develop that coat of hair in utero, but they keep it: young chimps, for example, are born hairy as hell. (Premature infants are sometimes covered with the lanugo, to the horror of their parents, but they quickly lose it.)

Well, this long introduction is by way of explaining Josephine Richardson’s alternative explanation. She sent a comment with her own divine explanation for bizarre features like the development of the vertebrate kidney, and tried to post it, curiously, on a “Readers’ wildlife photos” post.

Regarding your question in one of your posts as to why a creator would in human embryonic development give us three kidneys, the answer could go like this (to make a long story short, it makes more sense than yours): Since man (humans) are the crown of His creation, God mapped out his body plan or how he would function first. He subsequently proceeded to create everything else. This would mean fish, frogs, and all other living things were an after thought (they were created before man, but using the same ideas as the body plan of man). To be more clear, God created man first(by drawing him up like a dress designer or an architect), put him aside, and proceeded to create all other life forms which he presented as gifts for scientists as yourself to muse about (perhaps to keep you from being bored).

Yeah, that really makes sense! It sure explains why we have a transitory, nonfunctional prophepric kidney, and then another one, that just happens to resemble the kidney of embryonic fish and amphibians that becomes the adult kidney—before we wind up with the final kidney God gave us.  Is her plan, which simply posits an unevidenced God, and then twiddles with Genesis to claim that God designed humans, but then created other stuff first before actuating our species, really parsimonious? And why would other things be designed on the ground plan of man?  It’s just a mess, and it’s a testimony to the mental contortions that religious creationists go through that they see this kind of explanation as superior to that of evolution.

But wait! Ms. Richardson says she’s not a creationist! Not seeing her comment appear, she tried to post another one.

Did you get my comment on the why the Creator made our kidneys the way He did? I am not a creationist. I am a Jehovah’s Witness. Wonderful science articles can be found at http://www.jw.org. Please also read my personal website athttp://www.evolutioniswrong.org

I am currently working on new articles. Also, give me your opinion of my comments via facebook or email.My name is Josephine Richardson.

Not a creationist? Jehovah’s Witnesses are creationists! And if she’s not a creationist, what is all this business about God creating humans and designing other animals on our ground plan. Ms. Richardson is deeply, deeply confused.

*****

Finally, “JERRY HUNDLEY” (yes, all caps) put this comment on Monday’s “Readers’ wildlife photographs” post (since when have these become a repository for craziness?):

If man would start with the truth of the Biblical account of creation they would be many billions of light years ahead so they can really explore the amazing truths of nature in this world!

Yeah, I guess so . .

Caturday felid trifecta: Cat superhero and supernerd, Hello Kitty goes into space, and cat furniture

August 23, 2014 • 7:31 am

Aren’t you lucky? We have several items of ailurophilic interest today.

The cult of kawaii has hit the Japanese space program. According to brandchannel, the Japanese government is creating a Hello-Kitty-themed space flight:

Japan, for one, is also trying to re-engage young minds with the fascinations of space using a tried and true method: Hello Kitty.

The iconic figure, which is celebrating its 40th birthday, has created billions of dollars in revenue for its owner, Sanrio, and Japan hopes that its internationally-recognized animated toy will drive the same kind of cultural interest for its space program.

To get more private companies interested in using satellites, the government has invested $40 million toward the project, Reuters reports. The satellite carrying the 1.6-inch Hello Kitty figurine was fine-tuned over a couple of months of experimentation and is about the size of a garbage can.

“Through this project we can make those people interested and stimulate their scientific curiosity,” Toshiki Tanaka, researcher in charge of the project at the University of Tokyo’s Nano-Satellite Center, told the wire service. “We can move their hearts.”

. . . The “Let’s Send a Message From Space!” campaign will project one message per day from August 26 through September 8 inside the satellite while it’s perfectly positioned with Earth in the background.

Here’s Sanio’s video for the “Message from Space!” campaign. Perhaps a Japanese-speaking reader can give us a translation. Warning: very saccharine!

 

As brandchannel also reports, this isn’t Hello Kitty’s first venture into space:

Early last year, a seventh-grade girl attached Hello Kitty to a weather balloon and sent it nearly 18 miles into the air for a school science-fair project.

There was a GoPro camera on that balloon, so here’s the very nice film. See where Hello Kitty winds up!

The Data:

Cornerstone Christian school 7th grade science project.
The effects of Altitude on air pressure and temperature.
Cameras: GoPro Hero2 video footage.
Edited By: Eddie Lacayo elacayo212@gmail.com
Flight gear: High Altitude Science.
Flight computer / Data acquisition: High Altitude Science.
Tree Climber: Woodpecker Arborist.

*******

Second, two cat-related tw**ts, the first from Marie Le Conte:

Screen Shot 2014-08-13 at 8.01.41 AMand a tw**t from Emergency Kittens:

Screen Shot 2014-08-15 at 7.02.17 AM

 *******

Finally, for those of you with cats and extra dosh, you might consider buying some of this cat-compatible furniture shown on Bored Panda, where you can see many other items.  Here are a few of my favorites:

Outdoor catwalk (Image credits: nekomomo):

cat-furniture-creative-design-22

Rocking chair for cat and its staff (designed by: Paul Kweton):

cat-furniture-creative-design-33

Shark cat bed (Available at Amazon):

cat-furniture-103

Indiana Jones cat bridge (Designed by: CatastrophiCreations

cat-furniture-creative-design-15

Grass table for cats (Designed by: Emily Wettstein):

cat-furniture-creative-design-4

cat-furniture-creative-design-3

And my absolute favorite, the Radiator Cat Bed (Available at amazon.com):

cat-furniture-creative-design-34

 

There are 19 other items at the Bored Panda site. But I hope a reader buys the cat radiator bed!

 

 

h/t: Su, Andrey, Grania

Readers’ wildlife photos

August 23, 2014 • 4:07 am

First we have an Honorary Cat™ (also known as a fox) sent by reader Graham with the note:

As I’m typing this the fox is sitting in the garden, making itself at home and ignoring me. Photos taken with a Pentax K-500 with a Sigma 300 telephoto lens. Hope they’re good enough for your website :-).

IMGP0082

IMGP0096

And a wonderful series of photos of a rail attacking a crab on the Indian Ocean island of Aldabra (a coral atoll), sent by reader  and biologist Dennis Hansen. Note the flightless rail, of which there are several species. All, I recall, inhabit oceanic islands, underscoring the biogeographical observation that virtually all small flightless birds are found on islands.  Evolutionists have several explanations for this, but I don’t think we know the answer for sure. Can you think of some?

This bird appears to be classified as a subspecies of the white-throated rail (Dryolimnas cuvieri), and I’m surprised that, given its flightlessness, it hasn’t been classified as its own species. It appears to be the last flightless bird in the Indian Ocean.

We’ve had three previous submissions by Dennis, and you should go back and look at these if you haven’t. One is of the giant tortoises of Aldabra, and the other two on the fearsome coconut crab (here and here).

Dennis’s notes are indented:

I saw to my great consternation that you seem to be running out of  wildlife photos to share with your readers. Here’s a sequence of photos I took during fieldwork on Aldabra Atoll last year. The flightless rail (Dryolimnas [cuvieri] aldabranus) is possibly the most feline bird I have ever seen hunting down prey. The elegance with which they dance and  jump around is amazing. I am pretty damn happy they are only 20-25 cm  tall, or I would fear for my own eyes, too.

#1: The flightless Aldabra rail routinely hunts down the large, terrestrial crab Cardisoma carnifex. The fearsome name of the crab suggests that it is a predator – but not here…

Rail&Crab1
#2: First the rail hacks out the eyes of the crab with surgical precision… [JAC: This behavior is probably genetically encoded, but perhaps it is completely learned. I wonder if anyone’s studied that.]

Rail&Crab2
#3 & #4: …disabled, unable to see, the crab tries to crawl away, but is attacked by the rail from all directions…

Rail&Crab3

Rail&Crab4
#5: …until finally the rail manages to turn over the crab; seconds later the crab’s struggle ends, as the rail’s beak stabs through its abdomen.

Rail&Crab5
#6: This is the typical leftover after the rail has finished. Soon,  other crabs will move in to scavenge the remains. Nothing is wasted on  Aldabra.

Rail&Crab6

 

A photo of the Aldabra atoll from Panoramio. Wouldn’t it be nice to work here? The atoll is about 34 km long.

18612335

and here’s a short video of the rail and its chicks:

Saturday: Hili dialogue

August 23, 2014 • 2:25 am

The editor is dispirited by the sad state of humanity.

Hili: Sometimes I fall into a reverie.
A: What about?
Hili: How did a human get the idea that he was the most intelligent of all creatures?

10255428_10204094659154065_8692769789742812122_n
In Polish:
Hili: Czasem wpadam w zadumę.
Ja: Nad czym?
Hili: Jak człowiek wpadł na ten pomysł, że jest najbardziej inteligentny ze wszystkich stworzeń?

 

Paws and relax on British Airways

August 22, 2014 • 2:17 pm

We’ll end the week with—hmm. . . what will lift our spirits? How about CATS??

In a remarkably enlightened move, British Airways is tempting ailurophilic customers with a new channel on its long-distance flights. As Yahoo Travel reports:

Do you ever go on Youtube only to get caught in an endless web of cat videos? It’s pretty adorable and relaxing, huh?

British Airways thinks so, and has dedicated a new channel aboard their long-haul flights called ‘Paws and Relax.’ The channel, which is set to launch in September, is dedicated to light-hearted footage of cats and dogs. Sounds pretty purrrfect!

The airline recently unveiled their happiness blanket as a way to help passengers sleep better on flights, and now they’re turning to pets to further increase the mood of travelers.  In a video posted on Youtube, Inflight Entertainment Manager Richard D’Cruze says this is the newest tool that the airline is using to enhance the passenger experience. “We discovered some scientific research that proves watching images of cute animals can actually lower your heart rate and reduces stress levels,” says D’Cruze.

And to really tug at your heart strings, all of the animals used in the launch photos are from the Battersea Dogs and Cats Home and are available for adoption. So if Alfie the Pug, or kittens Karma, Knight, and Karis really capture your heart, you can take them home!

The programming lineup for the initial launch includes the animated cartoon Simon’s Cat, the documentary The Secret Life of Cats, and Animal Planet’s America’s Cutest Dog.

If you’re really sharp, you’ll remember that Larry, the cat who is Chief Mouser to the Cabinet Office at 10 Downing Street (yes, that’s an official British goverment position) was also procured from the Battersea Dogs and Cats Home, though, sadly, he won’t mouse.

And they can just ditch the d*gs; everyone knows that what the Internet is all about is CAT videos. Without cats, there would be no Internet, regardless of what Al Gore says. You think British Airways is gonna attract customers with ducks?

Here’s British Airways Inflight Entertainment Manager Richard D’Cruze explaining the new channel:

and, OMG, I’ve gotten way behind on Simon Tofield’s wonderful animations. There are at least six I haven’t shown, so let’s catch up with the first one, “Hot water”. This is a good one (notice the cat’s butt), and I expect Diana MacPherson will have a comment about the first thirty seconds:

Goalkeeper scores goal

August 22, 2014 • 1:40 pm

Here’s a tidbit for soccer lovers. I’m sure this has happened before (readers?), but I’ve never seen it. In this video of a game from August 9, Hibernian goalkeeper Mark Oxley scores a goal against Livingston on a kick out from his own goal. Hibernian won this one 2-1 in the Scottish Professional Football League Championship tournament, which, as far as I know, is still going on.

 

Old Blue Eyes on religion: “When lip service to some mysterious deity permits bestiality on Wednesday and absolution on Sunday — cash me out”

August 22, 2014 • 12:00 pm

If you think of Frank Sinatra as a dumb kid from Hoboken, New Jersey, who made it big from his voice alone, you’ll be surprised by this interview he gave to Playboy magazine in 1963. He’s thoughtful, articulate, and—surprise!—godless.

The Playboy interviews were famous, one of the best things about the magazine. I used to read them when I’d sneak a peek at my father’s magazines, which, of course, I read only for the stories and prose.  The interviews were superb, and this one is eye-opening. (For excerpts from 10 engaging interviews, go here.)

Now I can’t vouch 100% that this is an accurate transcription, but several sources (e.g., here) verify that Sinatra did give the interview then, and I doubt that the source of these quotes, the “Sinatra Forum,” would simply fabricate the whole thing. But it shows a man who, despite the slang, has seen right through religion’s pretensions and its fake claims to be the arbiter of morality.

So, without further ado, The Voice discusses God:

Playboy: All right, let’s start with the most basic question there is: Are you a religious man? Do you believe in God?

Sinatra: Well, that’ll do for openers. I think I can sum up my religious feelings in a couple of paragraphs. First: I believe in you and me. I’m like Albert Schweitzer and Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein in that I have a respect for life — in any form. I believe in nature, in the birds, the sea, the sky, in everything I can see or that there is real evidence for. If these things are what you mean by God, then I believe in God. But I don’t believe in a personal God to whom I look for comfort or for a natural on the next roll of the dice. I’m not unmindful of man’s seeming need for faith; I’m for anything that gets you through the night, be it prayer, tranquilizers or a bottle of Jack Daniel’s. But to me religion is a deeply personal thing in which man and God go it alone together, without the witch doctor in the middle. The witch doctor tries to convince us that we have to ask God for help, to spell out to him what we need, even to bribe him with prayer or cash on the line. Well, I believe that God knows what each of us wants and needs. It’s not necessary for us to make it to church on Sunday to reach Him. You can find Him anyplace. And if that sounds heretical, my source is pretty good: Matthew, Five to Seven, The Sermon on the Mount.

Playboy: You haven’t found any answers for yourself in organized religion?

Sinatra: There are things about organized religion which I resent. Christ is revered as the Prince of Peace, but more blood has been shed in His name than any other figure in history. You show me one step forward in the name of religion and I’ll show you a hundred retrogressions. Remember, they were men of God who destroyed the educational treasures at Alexandria, who perpetrated the Inquisition in Spain, who burned the witches at Salem. Over 25,000 organized religions flourish on this planet, but the followers of each think all the others are miserably misguided and probably evil as well. In India they worship white cows, monkeys and a dip in the Ganges. The Moslems accept slavery and prepare for Allah, who promises wine and revirginated women. And witch doctors aren’t just in Africa. If you look in the L.A. papers of a Sunday morning, you’ll see the local variety advertising their wares like suits with two pairs of pants.

Playboy: Hasn’t religious faith just as often served as a civilizing influence?

Sinatra: Remember that leering, cursing lynch mob in Little Rock reviling a meek, innocent little 12-year-old Negro girl as she tried to enroll in public school? Weren’t they — or most of them — devout churchgoers? I detest the two-faced who pretend liberality but are practiced bigots in their own mean little spheres. I didn’t tell my daughter whom to marry, but I’d have broken her back if she had had big eyes for a bigot. As I see it, man is a product of his conditioning, and the social forces which mold his morality and conduct — including racial prejudice — are influenced more by material things like food and economic necessities than by the fear and awe and bigotry generated by the high priests of commercialized superstition. Now don’t get me wrong. I’m for decency — period. I’m for anything and everything that bodes love and consideration for my fellow man. But when lip service to some mysterious deity permits bestiality on Wednesday and absolution on Sunday — cash me out.

Playboy: But aren’t such spiritual hypocrites in a minority? Aren’t most Americans fairly consistent in their conduct within the precepts of religious doctrine?

Sinatra: I’ve got no quarrel with men of decency at any level. But I can’t believe that decency stems only from religion. And I can’t help wondering how many public figures make avowals of religious faith to maintain an aura of respectability. Our civilization, such as it is, was shaped by religion, and the men who aspire to public office anyplace in the free world must make obeisance to God or risk immediate opprobrium. Our press accurately reflects the religious nature of our society, but you’ll notice that it also carries the articles and advertisements of astrology and hokey Elmer Gantry revivalists. We in America pride ourselves on freedom of the press, but every day I see, and so do you, this kind of dishonesty and distortion not only in this area but in reporting — about guys like me, for instance, which is of minor importance except to me; but also in reporting world news. How can a free people make decisions without facts? If the press reports world news as they report about me, we’re in trouble.

Parsing all that, sometimes he seems like a deist, but when he equates God with a bottle of Jack Daniel’s, we’re talking Alcoholic Pantheism, aka atheism. But note that the guy really had done some thinking about religion, even if he tries to express it like a hipster.  And could you guess that Sinatra would be capable of saying this: “Our civilization, such as it is, was shaped by religion, and the men who aspire to public office anyplace in the free world must make obeisance to God or risk immediate opprobrium. Our press accurately reflects the religious nature of our society, but you’ll notice that it also carries the articles and advertisements of astrology and hokey Elmer Gantry revivalists.” Big words, and as true now as it was then.

Then Sinatra realizes what he’s said, and that, even more then than now, public criticism of religion was a no-no. Somehow, though, this didn’t seem to have hurt his career.

Playboy: Are you saying that . . .

Sinatra: No, wait, let me finish. Have you thought of the chance I’m taking by speaking out this way? Can you imagine the deluge of crank letters, curses, threats and obscenities I’ll receive after these remarks gain general circulation? Worse, the boycott of my records, my films, maybe a picket line at my opening at the Sands. Why? Because I’ve dared to say that love and decency are not necessarily concomitants of religious fervor.

Playboy: If you think you’re stepping over the line, offending your public or perhaps risking economic suicide, shall we cut this off now, erase the tape and start over along more antiseptic lines?

Sinatra: No, let’s let it run. I’ve thought this way for years, ached to say these things. Whom have I harmed by what I’ve said? What moral defection have I suggested? No, I don’t want to chicken out now. Come on, pal, the clock’s running.

Frank Sinatra 1959 "Come Dance With Me" Capitol Records © 1978 Sid Avery
A godless heathen tempts you to share his unbelief