British Muslim leader: “Zionists stole my shoe!”

June 15, 2015 • 9:15 am

This story is making the rounds in the UK, and shows not only the extreme paranoia of British Muslim leaders (especially the radical ones who, like Asghar Bukhari, are in the business of justifying Islamic terrorism), but also their tendency to blame everything on the Jews. Fortunately, Bukhari’s cries that one of his shoes was stolen by British Zionists has been met with mockery and derision, as well it should. (I suspect, however, that the Guardian will go along with the Mossad shoe-stealing theory!)

Bukhari is one of what appears to be about three members of the British Muslim Public Affairs Committee, which appears to be largely an anti-Semitic and pro-radical-Muslim group. The Torygraph says this about it:

The Muslim Public Affairs Committee UK describes itself as a grassroots civil liberties organisation that works to “expose and counter the sinister and toxic anti Muslim narrative that permeates mainstream politics and media”. It has been accused of being an extremist and anti-Semitic militant body and is banned from many universities as a hate group.

My friend Malgorzata adds, “This man is a spokesman for Muslim community, respected by British authorities as a very moderate Muslim, a constant guest on BBC. His words are treated by Guardian as gospel.”

Bukhari is a nasty piece of work. Here’s a video of him on Sky News in January, basically claiming that the murdered Charlie Hebdo workers were asking for it, and that that attack, as with many others, are the result of Western colonialism. His critic on the big screen is the British writer Douglas Murray:

But then he lost a shoe. . . Three days ago Bukhari put up this Facebook post decrying the lost footwear, and blaming it on “Zionists”:

Screen Shot 2015-06-15 at 7.15.37 AM

And then he issued a video limning, at tedious length, the Mossad Theory of Footwear Theft:

This man is one neuron shy of a synapse. Why does the British journalistic establishment take him seriously?

I’ve realized, though, that one thing Tw*tter is good for is mockery, as in the case of #distractinglysexy and l’affaire Tim Hunt. But now we have the new hashtag site #Mossadstolemyshoe, and here’s a few prize specimens:

Screen Shot 2015-06-15 at 8.00.10 AM

Screen Shot 2015-06-15 at 8.00.45 AM

Screen Shot 2015-06-15 at 8.03.30 AM
Screen Shot 2015-06-15 at 8.01.59 AM

Screen Shot 2015-06-15 at 8.05.54 AM

Screen Shot 2015-06-15 at 8.15.18 AM

Screen Shot 2015-06-15 at 8.25.52 AM

Readers’ wildlife photos (Monday bumper edition)

June 15, 2015 • 8:20 am

The photo tank, dear readers, is running a bit low, so please send me your good wildlife photos for consideration.  Today we have photos by four readers. First, regular Diana MacPherson is still snapping her eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus), and she got a great photo yesterday:

This guy was shovelling seeds into his mouth to put away in his burrow. Notice the ant clinging to his whiskers! Many a time the ant was close to being devoured but never was.

270A2463

This one’s from Stephen Barnard in Idaho.

Flying in formation: Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus) and Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus):

RT9A8495

David Policansky, an old friend but a new contributor, sends two photos. First, a red-winged blackbird, photographed on Nantucket flaunting his epaulets:

1R5A9873-1sg

And a lovely rufous hummingbird (Selasphorus rufus):

IMG_1718-1sg

From reader Mal Morrison, who sent these last Wednesday:

This morning I went to Prawle Point which is the most southerly point in Devon. I took these while walking the coastal footpath. The first bird is a Eurasian Stonechat (Saxicola torquata) and the other is a Whitethroat (Sylvia communis) which is a type of warbler.

untitled-6870

untitled-6903

Making my way back to the car I was very surprised when I almost walked into a Badger (Meles meles). It was pretty shocked as well judging from its hair in the second picture! We had a moment when we looked at each other and then it turned tail and slowly walked slowly into the long grass to the right. I’ve never seen one during the day before. It was quite early but two and a half hours since dawn.

untitled-6921

untitled-6923

Here are the tree frogs

June 15, 2015 • 7:30 am

Yesterday I had a “spot the woodfrog” post, with the photo contributed by reader Mark Sturtevant, who placed the two gray tree frogs (Hyla versicolor) on a tree trunk. One reader put the solution in the comments, but here’s the definitive answer from Mark. And note how cryptic these little guys are!

Here are the tree frogs. These cute little critters are pretty common around here. The two used in this picture currently live in a preferred spot in my yard. One is always in the gap between my shed door and frame (I am vary careful opening and closing my shed), and the other is always found in a hole in our fence. I released them near where I found them, and within the day they both returned to their exact ‘spot’ where they have stayed for several weeks so far. I check on them every time I mow my lawn.

2 Screen Shot 2015-06-14 at 2.39.35 PM

The 2nd picture is the shed frog. This one has put up with my moving him (her?) around for pictures on several occasions. I think it has a funny expression on its face.

3 IMG_1004 copy

I expect you know that two related species of these frogs live in America, and that they mainly differ in their range and by one being diploid while the other is tetraploid. The one that is likely where I live (Michigan) is the tetraploid one, and the more southern species (H. chrysoscelis) is diploid. The whole story is summarized here.

Reader Su made a meme of that photo based on “the most interesting man in the world” Dos Equis ad (the man poses like the frog):

weit frog

Monday: Hili dialogue

June 15, 2015 • 5:42 am

And so another week begins, and my campus will be empty as all the students have gone. But my squirrels remain, and I’ve restocked the larder with nuts and seeds. Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, today’s dialogue has a title: “V-Formation of Angels.”  Apparently Hili, down at the Vistula, looked up and saw a flock of birds in the distance—perhaps geese or ducks.

Hili: Strange…
A: What is so strange?
Hili: The angels flew in very late this year.
P1020923
In Polish:
Klucz aniołów
Hili: Dziwne…
Ja: Co jest takie dziwne?
Hili: Strasznie późno anioły w tym roku przyleciały.

 

Spot the tree frogs!

June 14, 2015 • 3:45 pm

No nightjars this time, but reader Mark Sturtevant sent a photo that has cryptic tree frogs in it. To wit:

I have placed two gray tree frogs (probably Hyla versicolor) on this tree trunk. Can your readers find them? For scale, the frogs are about 2 inches long from nose to rump, and the ridges on the bark are often about that wide. Here is a picture of what these look like.

They are very obliging at being placed on the tree pretty much wherever I want to stick them. And they do stick pretty well, given their tree froggy toes and generally sticky skin.

Okay, where are they? Answer later.

Find the tree frogs

Left Jab radio interview

June 14, 2015 • 2:30 pm
Here’s another radio interview about my book, one taking place tonight between 8:05 and 8:17 ET (subtract one hour for Chicago time) on Sirius XM Radio, Channel 127, the “Progress Channel”. The show is “Left Jab Radio”, which airs for two hours on Sunday evening, and you can find the link here. It being Sirius and all, I think you have to pay to subscribe, but the podcasts are archived at the link. If there’s a way to listen for free, do post it below.

Brother Tayler’s Sunday Secular Sermon: Scalia must go

June 14, 2015 • 1:15 pm

Brother Jeffrey Tayler has once again undermined Salon’s reputation for osculating faith: his latest piece of anti-theism is about Antonin Scalia’s irrational and extreme Catholicism, which has always surprised me (I still get astounded when someone with a lot of brains is deeply religious): “Justice Scalia is unfit to serve: A justice who rejects science for religion is of unsound mind.

Last week I posted about Scalia’s statement, at his granddaughter’s high school graduation, that humanity is very young: “Humanity has been around for at least some 5,000 years or so.” As I noted at the time, it’s not clear that this means Scalia accepts the Bishop Ussher-ian age of the Earth from Genesis, whether he was just referring to civilization itself (still about twice as old as Scalia’s estimate), or whether he was just making a lighthearted remark. But one can’t so easily discount Scalia’s statement in 2013 that Satan and Hell are for real (see my post on that interview here).  Dr. Tayler diagnoses Scalia with a chronic case of Faith Derangement Syndrome and, at the end, calls for Scalia to resign (that has a snowball’s chance in Scalia’s Hell!):

Sufferers of faith-derangement syndrome (FDS) exhibit the following symptoms: unshakable belief in the veracity of manifest absurdities detailed in ancient texts regarding the origins of the cosmos and life on earth; a determination to disseminate said absurdities in educational institutions and via the media; a propensity to enjoin and even enforce (at times using violence) obedience to regulations stipulated in said ancient texts, regardless of their suitability for contemporary circumstances; the conviction that an invisible, omnipresent, omniscient authority (commonly referred to as “God”) directs the course of human and natural events, is vulnerable to propitiation and blandishments, and monitors individual human behavior, including thought processes, with an especially prurient interest in sexual activity.

Secondary symptoms exhibited by sufferers of FDS comprise feelings of righteousness and sensations of displeasure, even outrage, when collocutors question, reject or refute the espousal of said absurdities. Tertiary symptoms, often present among individuals self-classifying as “evangelicals”: Duggar-esque hairdos and Tammy Bakker-ian makeup, preternaturally sunny dispositions and pedophiliac tendencies, sartorial ineptitude and obesity.

It’s astounding that a man Scalia’s undoubted intelligence is so soaked in irrationality. Remember, too, that in the case of Edwards v. Aguillard, a 1987 case adjudicating the constitutionality of a Louisiana law (the “Balanced Treatment Act”) requiring “creation science” taught alongside evolution in the public schools, Scalia was one of two (along with Rehnquist) who dissented in the Act’s dismissal. His dissent said, among other things, this:

Because I believe that the Balanced Treatment Act had a secular purpose, which is all the first component of the Lemon test requires, I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand for further consideration.

Scalia decided that all views should be presented, and the children should be able to decide for themselves. But why not, then, teach faith healing, like Christian “Science”, in the health classroom?

At any rate, Tayler adds this, among much else:

Arguably one of the most visible members of the nine-member body charged with the decisive resolution of our republic’s most contentious legal matters, Scalia confronts us with a sui generis challenge of great urgency: how to go about declaring a magistrate appointed for life of unsound mind and thus unfit to serve? Scalia rejects the fact of evolution – the foundation of modern biology – in favor of the opening chapter of a compendium of cockamamie fables concocted by obscure humans in a particularly dark age, evidence that his faculty of reason has suffered the debilitating impairment associated with acute FDS. He therefore cannot be relied upon to adjudicate without prejudice and should be removed from the bench henceforth.

I was sent the Tayler link by a flight attendant who had a personal encounter with Le Scalia, and not a pleasant one, either, adding in the accompanying email (which I pass along without comment):

I had that asshat on a flight once from Florida to Washington. It took all I had not to spit in his drink. He’s huge, too. He was SOOOO rude, like a spoiled and demanding child, and he had these little minions bringing his bag on and making sure he was ok and comfortable. I was so glad when he fell asleep. He was sitting in business class, of course. Maybe gawd will take him to his bosom when Hillary gets elected and she can throw another liberal in there.