Maybe I should stop posting about science

April 7, 2016 • 1:30 pm

I’ve long kvetched about the lack of comments on my science posts. I kvetch because a). many readers tell me they want more science, or read this site for its science, and b). the science posts are the hardest ones to write, as they involve reading a paper several times and then distilling the essence for nonscientists.

In response to my beefing, readers have assured me that they do read the science posts, but simply lack the professional expertise to comment.

But I’m not sure that’s the case, at least judging by the views that such posts get. Here, for instance, is a tally of views from my most recent science post:

Untitled

See the eye at lower left? 249 TOTAL views. That’s pretty pathetic given that other recent posts have been viewed dozens or hundreds of times more.

I’m not asking for reassurance here; I don’t want any. But I am contemplating getting rid of my posts about new results in evolutionary biology—unless people start reading them.

Woman raises cats in a gender neutral way

April 7, 2016 • 12:15 pm

Several readers called this piece to my attention, at last one of whom assumed it was an April Fool’s joke. But I’m pretty sure it’s not, if for no other reason than that it was posted on April 5.

The piece, by Lauren P. Taylor in the Washington Post is called “Don’t laugh: I have a serious reason for raising my cats gender-neutral.” Taylor is identified as “a self-defense instructor and anti-violence educator based in Washington, D.C. She is also a member of the editorial page staff.” The piece goes to show how far virtue signalling has invaded the media.

Taylor’s premise is this: she is not assigning genders to her two female (pardon me!) cats—not calling them “her” or “girls”—as a way of practicing avoiding the dreaded Gender Binary that plagues society. Instead, Taylor uses a term for each cat that some people use for themselves when they feel they’re both male and female, or are unsure: “they” or “them.” For example, if I used that pronoun, I’d describe myself this way: “Jerry is a superannuated professor; they worked for 30 years at the University of Chicago.”

Taylor:

Even though using they, them and their as singular pronouns grates on many people because it’s grammatically incorrect, it seems to be the most popular solution to the question of how to identify people without requiring them to conform to the gender binary of female and male. It also just feels right to refer to people as they wish to be referred to.

Around the house, with just me, Essence and Trouble – named for Rare Essence and Trouble Funk, for the DC music lovers reading this – things were pretty easy. I’d make a mistake (called “misgendering”), saying something like “Where’s your brother?” (Yes, I talk to my cats.)  Usually, I’d remember to fix it (“Where’s your sibling?” or “Where’s your pal?”).  Just as I’d hoped, I began finding it easier to remember to use gender-neutral language for the humans in my life.

Agreed. But this caused some problems with the moggies, especially at the vet’s (she punted, reverting to her “cis-gender privilege”!):

And I began to get an infinitesimal taste of what transgender and gender-nonconforming people face. I’m not talking about the outright bigotry and hatred –something I can’t know without being in their shoes — but the complete cluelessness. Friends would come over, I’d introduce the cats and their pronouns, and some would ask, “But what ARE they?” Some would randomly use “he” and “she.” Some would stumble, unable to form a sentence when talking about one of the cats.

Things got a little more real when Essence got sick. They were really sick.  I took them to the vet and had to weigh the question: Do I explain their pronouns not only to the vet, but also the front-desk workers, the vet techs, and everyone else we interacted with? Before the illness was over, we saw five vets, two sets of front desk people, and countless vet techs. I chose to fall back on my cis-gender privilege (look it up) and used the singular pronoun for Essence. I understood that wouldn’t have been so easy if I were the patient — or if Essence were human.

While all of this was unfolding, friends would ask me: How is your cat? “They’re better” or “The same. The vets don’t know what’s wrong with them,” I’d say. “Wait a minute—are they both sick?” people would reply, confused.

Finally, she emphasizes her rationale:

It is confusing. We’ve had gender drilled into us as part of language since we first heard adults talking when we were infants – decades of “he” and “she.”

But at the same time it’s necessary. People are coming to understand that not all of us fit into the “girl” box or the “boy” box. Those who don’t are claiming space to be who they are. We all need to find ways to acknowledge and respect that. My way of respecting it just happens to be raising my cats gender neutral. You can choose your own.

While I agree that we should use whatever pronoun a person wishes to use for themselves, it is not the case that there is no gender binary among humans. In the vast majority of cases, someone’s biological sex aligns well with their “gender” (i.e., whether they identify as a male or a female). I believe they don’t align in about 3% of people: those who feel they’re of both sexes, who are transgender individuals, or even those who don’t feel human. So if you make a frequency diagram of those whose gender aligns with their sex, you’d get a plot with two huge peaks (“male and female”) and a lot of intermediate points for the others.

This doesn’t mean we shouldn’t respect and sympathize with the plight of those whose psychology doesn’t align with their genitalia or other secondary sexual characteristics. We should. But until these people become more numerous, I’ll avoid asking them “what’s your pronoun?” If they correct me, I’ll respect them, but there’s no need to get huffy about it.

But really—with cats? The most trenchant of the 249 comments under the article is this one:

Screen Shot 2016-04-07 at 11.03.24 AM

I’m starting to realize the real value and psychological aptness of the term “virtue signalling”.

 

 

Obama to speak on Supreme Court; livestreamed at 2:30 Chicago time

April 7, 2016 • 12:00 pm

At 2:30 Central time (1:30 Eastern time; 8:30 London time), President Obama will be speaking at the University of Chicago Law School about the Supreme Court. We just got a link from the University News office, so if you click on the video below at that time, you’ll get to hear Obama’s talk. He’ll certainly address the Republican refusal to even consider his nominee.

What’s wrong with this ad?

April 7, 2016 • 11:10 am

Here’s an ad for a new clothing line involving a collaboration between The Gap corporation and comedian Ellen DeGeneris. Look at it, and then guess why it provoked a huge burst of outrage on social media—one so violent that The Gap is going to pull the ad.

The girls, by the way, are members of Le Petit Cirque, described (not in the ad) as “the only all-kid humanitarian cirque company in the world, comprised of eye-popping, pro-level children aged 5-14.”

_89090757_04d5172f-2a2c-4484-89d2-7a8d8c4deec0

Have you guessed the problem?

Now here’s an earlier ad from The Gap. Would having seen this tend to ameliorate any criticism directed at the photo above? If not, why not? The fact is that it didn’t.

_89090917_0e88dbab-2e40-4e4c-a42a-928ced5844e7

Now read about the issue, and see a sample of social media outrage, at the BBC site where this was posted. (See also here.)

I’ll leave comments about the sensitivity of people, and the obsessive search for things to be outraged about, to the readers.

h/t: Barry

Houston this weekend

April 7, 2016 • 10:15 am

The Lone Star College Book Fair starts tomorrow in Houston, Texas, and if you live there, drop by and say hi. I’m speaking (or rather discussing) on Saturday at 12:30; it will be a conversation with Dan Barker, who’s discussing his own new book, God: The Most Unpleasant Character in All Fiction, at 3:15 the same day. There will be a book signing (they may have both FvF and WEIT) right after my event; if you give me the Latin binomial for a felid native to Texas, you can get a cat drawn in your book.

I think it’s free for everyone. If you know any good places to eat (I’m going to Goode Co. for BBQ already), let me know.

 

Another secular blogger hacked to death in Bangladesh

April 7, 2016 • 9:46 am

I don’t know what to do about this except to tell public secularists (or critics of Islam) living in Bangladesh (especially Dhaka) to get the hell out of there. This is at least the fourth case I remember, but Wikipedia, in its article on “Attacks on secularists in Bangladesh” lists at least nine victims as well as several more (e.g., Taslima Nasreen) who have been targeted.

In  this case the victim, first hacked up with machetes and then shot (his brains were said to have splattered the sidewalk), was 28-year-old Nazimuddin Samad, said to have criticized Islamism on his Facebook page. And he also promoted evolution! As the Guardian reports:

“At least four assailants hacked Nazimuddin Samad’s head with a machete on Wednesday night. As he fell down, one of them shot him with a pistol from close range. He died on the spot,” deputy commissioner of Dhaka Metropolitan police Syed Nurul Islam told AFP.

“It is a case of targeted killing. But no group has claimed responsibility,” Islam said, adding police were investigating whether Samad was murdered for his writing.

The Dhaka Tribune said the assailants shouted Allahu Akbar (God is greatest) as they attacked Samad on a busy road near Dhaka’s Jagannath University, where he was a law student.

Samad was known to have been critical of state religion in the Bangladeshi constitution. In the first two lines detailing his religious views on Facebook, he stated: “Evolution is a scientific truth. Religion and race are invention of the savage and uncivil people.”

Here’s part of his “about me” statment on his Facebook page, mostly in Bangla but with some English:

Screen Shot 2016-04-07 at 9.16.53 AM

Imagine getting killed for saying stuff like that! A bit more from the Guardian:

Imran Sarker, who leads Bangladesh’s largest online secular activist group and is the head of the Bangladesh Bloggers Association, said Samad had joined nationwide protests in 2013 against top Islamist leaders accused of committing war crimes during the country’s war of independence.

“He was a secular online activist and a loud voice against any social injustice. He was against Islamic fundamentalism,” said Sarker.

[Mustakur] Rahman said he had warned Samad about his social media posts that were critical of Islamism and religion: “Whatever he posted, I would see as fun. But people are taking it seriously and taking revenge. As a friend I warned him about the posts, I don’t want anyone to die early. But he said he can’t change his opinion against any religion.

This is probably not the last killing by any means; there’s reportedly a hit list of 84 Bangladeshi bloggers, though its authenticity isn’t guaranteed. But several on it have been killed, and the rest surely know the danger they’re in. Nevertheless, some keep on writing. Really brave peopl.

Here’s Samad’s photo from his Facebook page:

12654658_1039538889425777_3029077871437618407_n

And really, are Islamic apologists going to blame this one (and the others) on the West? That’s not credible, for public secularism is more or less a capital crime in some Islamic countries.

Reader’s wildlife photographs

April 7, 2016 • 8:30 am

I’m late today; I overslept while recovering from jet lag, and am preparing for a trip to Houston. On my way to work, there were police cars and helicopters everywhere, for President Obama is speaking today at the Law School (only law students and profs allowed) about his Supreme Court nomination.  But on to the photos:

Reader Stephen Barnard has been experimenting with video, and I’m chuffed to present his first one. His notes:

When a Bald Eagle (in this case Desi —Haliaeetus leucocephalus) carries a load to the nest (in this case a Rainbow Trout — Oncorhynchus mykiss), he first swoops below the nest to pick up air speed, then rises to a perfect stall before landing, gently. It’s a beautiful maneuver.

To see it in full size rather than the reduced version below, go to the flickr page.

And reader Mark Sturtevant sent some lovely photos of arthropods:

First we have the lovely orchard spider (Leucauge venusta), which spins a distinct orb web that is somewhat horizontal.

1Orchardspider

The next picture is of another orchard spider. I really like how the abdomen resembles antique porcelain, and check out those beautiful translucent green legs. This picture took many hours to prepare because as an experiment I combined two pictures that were focused slightly differently. The final picture was assembled manually by transplanting focused parts from one picture onto the 2nd picture, and blending the pieces together. The surgical operation was done with a free program called Gimp, which is very much like Photoshop (only its free). To complete the process, many of the tiny bristles that are silhouetted against the background are drawn in. If you double click and zoom in further you might be able to detect my deception.

2orchardspider

Next is a colorful two-striped grasshopper (Melanoplus bivittatus.), named after the two parallel stripes running down its prothorax I have not had much success taking pictures of Orthopterans since they always jump away, but this one was kept overnight and released the next day. It was hungry, so it allowed me to take pictures while it was munching on plants.

3grasshopper

This wasp was extremely hard to identify, but I think I finally got it. It belongs to the family Thynnidae (a family I do not recall hearing about), and it is a five-banded Tiphiid wasp (Myzinum quinquecinctum) – so apparently it was once in the Tiphiid family (?). These wasps are parasitoids of beetle larvae in the scarabeid family. Perhaps this one parasitizes June bugs, for example.

4Thynnid

Finally, a viceroy butterfly (Limenitis archippus) which is a well known Müllerian mimic of the monarch butterfly. I had seen this male repeatedly over a period of a couple weeks, sitting at his favorite perch along a field path that I used regularly in my photo safaris.

JAC: Mark got it right here. It used to be thought that the viceroy was a “Batesian mimic” of the monarch: a tasty butterfly that gained protection from bird predation by evolving the warning colors of the unpalatable monarch butterfly. In other words, it deceived the predator about its palatability. This is the way the system was taught by evolutionists (including me) for many years. Now, however, recent experiments suggest that the viceroy is also unpalatable to birds, and that it’s a case of Müllerian mimicry, in which two unpalatable species converge in color and/or pattern, which reduces predation by making the butterfly’s appearance easier to remember (and avoid) by birds.

5Viceroy