Faith v. Fact: Audiobooks and recent broadcasts

June 16, 2015 • 10:45 am

I have four business items—the announcement of an audiobook and three broadcasts.

First, I’ve signed a contract that will make Faith Versus Fact into an audiobook. For those of you who prefer listening, you will eventually have it on CD (or however they do these things; I’ve never listened to an audiobook). Someone told me that most audiobooks are abridged; I have no idea whether that’s true, or whether mine will be.

Second, an audio transcript of my appearance on last Friday’s Brian Lehrer show is available here.  Lehrer did ask a rather invidious question at the end, but I deflected it.

Also, my 17-minute interview on Sunday’s Left Jab Radio is also archived here. The interviewer was remarkably sympathetic, though I see that I need to work on saying “you know” less often!

Finally, for Canadian readers, you can catch my television appearance on Steve Paikin’s The Agenda tonight on TVO; the show starts at 8 pm and is repeated at 11 pm (presumably Toronto time). I’m not sure when I come on, but our one-on-one chat lasted about 25 minutes. I’ll put up a link later when it’s archived.) One reader informs me that based on the ordering in the show’s schedule, I may go first.

As lagniappe (?), here are a few more photos of my trip to Canada.

First, here are the speakers and organizers of the INR5 conference in Vancouver. I won’t list the names; you’ll surely recognize some of them. I believe the photo was taken by Melissa Chen and circulated by Vyckie Garrison, who’s in the front row with a drink. I will point out the two main organizers: Bill and Kathy Ligertwood: Bill’s second from right in the front row, and Kathy is slightly crouched down in front of him, her hands on the shoulders of Tom Melchiorre, a key person in the meeting’s logistics. Lawrence Krauss and Seth Andrews had departed before the photo was taken.

1907489_10152510236198039_2017554103741322594_n

I chat with Eric Adriaans, the new head of the Centre for Inquiry, Canada, in the CfI offices (the two photos below are from Mark Taylor). He kindly gave me a copy of the Charlie Hebdo that came out after the terrorist attack—the issue with the weeping Muhammad on the cover. It’s a collector’s item now.

100_4147

Buy the damn book, already!

100_4155

Ex-Muslim’s letter to UC Berkeley student newspaper retracted because of “personal safety concerns”

June 16, 2015 • 9:45 am

Enough is damn enough, already! The threat of Islamic terrorism is cowing nearly everyone, including the editors of the Berkeley student newspaper The Daily Californian.

About two weeks ago, the paper published a really nice op-ed by an ex-Muslim from Pakistan, recounting how she (the author was obviously a woman) left Islam. At the time, the author’s name was appended to the piece. I’ve put that original letter at the bottom of this post, but have left out the author’s name. I’ve done that because the paper or author, apparently under threat, retracted the letter.

Here’s the paper’s retraction:

Screen Shot 2015-06-16 at 8.52.39 AM

As the Daily Caller reports,

The precise nature of these safety concerns, and whether they arose in reaction to direct threats levied against the author, is not clear. The Daily Caller News Foundations reached out to both the author and Veklerov for further details, but only Veklerov replied and she declined to comment.

If the paper was threatened, it would seem incumbent on Veklerov to report it, but we know how scared editors are.  I would think it seriously incumbent on the paper to write an editorial decrying these threats to free speech, especially since the original letter, which you’ll see below, was neither “strident” nor “shrill.” It was simply a personal tale of leaving faith behind. But of course we know that to many Muslims, apostasy = death.

But regardless of whether the retraction was requested by the author, or mandated by the paper, it shows how the thuggery of radical Islam is silencing free speech: in this case, a perfectly reasonable personal story about abandoning an oppressive faith. Clearly there were threats.

Finally, here’s the original letter, which was published (sans authorial name) on reddit:

If someone had told me six years ago that I would leave Islam and end up an atheist, I would never have believed him.

I was born and raised as a Muslim. I grew up in a Muslim country — Pakistan — surrounded by other Muslims who were convinced that their religion was the one true religion. My family, in particular, followed moderate Sunni Islam, which is a more liberal approach based on the “Sunnah,” or Prophet’s teachings. That was the path I set out on. But now, as a Muslim apostate and atheist, my journey couldn’t have led me any further from what I once knew to be true.

Until I was 14, I simply accepted everything I’d been told about Islam. I was taught that being born into a Muslim family is a blessing and is the greatest gift that Allah can bestow upon someone. I initially thought the Sunni path I followed was the one true path, just like my Shia, Bori and Ismaili friends adhered to the teachings of the sects their families followed. I noticed how everyone around me claimed to have a monopoly on the truth, which made me question who was actually right. I started to view Islam — and religion in general — as something dogmatic, irrational, unscientific and, most of all, completely sexist.

A feminist since age 10, it’s always been hard for me to reconcile my feminism with my faith. Even though the Pakistani society in which I grew up was sexist, my family has always been very progressive. As a result, I never accepted the male superiority and traditional gender roles that were part of my society. For most of my teen years, I felt torn apart by my contradictory beliefs. On one hand, I was a radical feminist who supported gay rights. But on the other hand, I was a practicing Muslim whose religion was clearly homophobic and placed men above women.

At that point, I still believed in an all-knowing God, and I felt that if I learned more about Islam, I would be able to understand why it stated the things it did. I read the Quran with translation and countless books on Islamic jurisprudence. I started taking classes at Zaynab Academy and Al-Huda, two traditional Islamic organizations. The Islam they preached was not the liberal, fluid Islam of my parents: Instead, it followed the Quran very rigidly. While the moderate Muslims I knew never encouraged hijab or gender segregation, these institutions differed in their views. I started to follow a more ritualistic Islam, going as far as giving up listening to music and wearing the hijab.

Stifled by orthodox Islam, I decided to turn to a more liberal approach. I embraced Sufism, which is the mystical side of Islam, and began to see God as an entity of love. Feminist scholars, such as Amina Wadud and Leila Ahmed, gave me a glimmer of hope that Islam and feminism could be compatible, although I later found their arguments very selective. On the other extreme, I read writers such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali, another ex-Muslim atheist, whose harsh criticism of Islam was not always justified.

After trying to understand Islam through a plurality of perspectives — orthodox, feminist, Sufi and liberal approaches — I decided to leave Islam, but by that point, I had realized that I didn’t need to look at things as black and white. I could leave Islam without dismissing it or labeling it as wrong.

Going through all of these versions of Islam has enabled me to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the religion. Islam is no monolith, and with more than 1.5 billion followers, it’s impossible to refer to Islam as a single entity. There are Muslim women who cover every inch of their bodies except for their eyes, and there are also Muslim women who wear short skirts. With so much variation amongst Muslims, it’s hard to determine who really gets to speak for Islam.

Despite being one of the fastest-growing religions in the world, Islam is still extremely misrepresented and shrouded with stereotypes. I want to address these stereotypes and portray Islam in all its diversity. I’ve experienced the religion firsthand and have also viewed it as an objective bystander. I probably spend more time thinking about God than most religious people; despite my skepticism, I’ve always yearned for a spiritual connection. I want to share what I’ve learned about Islam over the years. I plan to defend it and give credit where it’s due — Islam, after all, gave women the right to work and own property back in the seventh century — and I also plan to ruthlessly point out areas that need reform (yes, Islam does allow men to have four wives and sex slaves).

If there’s one thing I’ve learned about Islam, it’s that my former religion, just like any other ideology, has its flaws. Religion should not be immune to criticism. It’s important to have an honest dialogue about religion and identify what can be improved — and that’s exactly what I plan to do.

Seriously, what about that letter should doom its author? It’s time to put a stop to the kind of bullying barbarism that can censor a letter this mild—a letter that even says some good things about Islam, and suggests simply that it be improved. It even suggests that Islam and feminism can be harmonized, though I find that a real stretch.

If someone wrote the same letter about Catholicism, Orthodox Judaism, or any patriarchal faith, there would have been no problem. The problem is Islam. And this is why Ayaan Hirsi Ali has bodyguards.

Raccoon rides alligator

June 16, 2015 • 8:17 am

UPDATE: A reader in the comments (#2) gives a reference suggesting that this photo may be a fake. Stay tuned.

_________

If this photo hasn’t gone viral, it will. It shows a raccoon (Procyon lotor) riding an alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) in Florida. WPTV in West Palm Beach gives details:

A Palatka man’s son was able to quickly take an amazing photo of a raccoon riding on top of an alligator in the Ocala National Forest Saturday morning.

Richard Jones told WFTV in Orlando that he and his family were walking along the Oklawaha River watching alligators when his son walked through palm fronds to get a good picture.

Jones told WFTV that his son must have startled the raccoon, which he said then stumbled toward the water and hopped on top of the gator that was near the water’s edge.

CHjrr_WUcAALv3H

Since we’re all concerned about the fate of the raccoon, I can report that he hopped off without being nommed.

h/t: Hempenstein

Readers’ wildlife photographs

June 16, 2015 • 8:00 am

The first set of photos, of both animals and Roman architecture, are by reader  Jonathan Wallace:

The first picture shows a group of white storks [Ciconia ciconia] on battlements at Meknes in northern Morocco and the second shows a stork on a nest at the Roman ruins of Volubilis nearby to Meknes.  White storks evolved as tree-nesters but very readily nest on human habitations, sometimes in spectacular colonies.  They are culturally important birds in most places that they occur and platforms are commonly erected to provide nesting places for them and encourage them to settle.  Volubilis is an extensive set of ruins of an ancient Roman city and well worth a visit if visiting Morocco.

meknes cigognes blanches sur remparts

volubilis cigogne plus ruines3

These shots show a general view of the ruins at Volubilis plus a couple of closeups of some of the mosaics there.

volubilis forum

volubilis mosaic2

volubilis mosaic4

And the ever-faithful contributor Stephen Barnard sent photos of turkey vultures (Cathartes aura):

RT9A3089

RT9A3160

RT9A3226

Have you seen Jurassic World?

June 16, 2015 • 6:17 am

by Matthew Cobb

I went to see Jurassic World with my family last night, and was frankly disappointed. Never mind the lack of feathered theropods, what about the plot?! (I fear the elevator pitch must have been something like “Home Alone 3 meets Transformers: Dark Side of Moon”.)

I invite readers who have seen the film, thereby contributing to the biggest grossing weekend in film history (it took over $510 million!), to do two things:

a) Chip in below with your high and low points. NB this will be a spoilerful zone, so if you want to watch the film not knowing what happens, do not read the comments!

b) Help dino researcher Dave Hone who is studying reactions to the film. You can do his brief survey here. Here’s an explanation of the project. Please spread the word as far as possible!

 

JWsurvey poster final

Tuesday: Hili dialogue

June 16, 2015 • 5:39 am

As I look out my window, I can see exactly—nothing. The city is swathed in a thick blanket of fog, and last night we had the first tornado warning I remember since I’ve lived in Chicago. Funnel clouds were spotted above downtown, but fortunately they didn’t touch down. The good news (for most people; I don’t care much) is that the Chicago Blackhawks won the Stanley Cup last night, beating Tampa Bay 2-0. That establishes us as a real hockey power, having won the Cup three times in six years. That also means that the Cup will be on display for a short while in my dentist’s office, as he’s the Official Dentist of the Blackhawks (he has to go to every game, and there’s a dental clinic in the arena to fix up players’ shattered teeth on the spot). Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili and Cyrus affirm their unholy alliance.

Cyrus: We are living like cat and dog.
Hili: Exactly.

P1020955
This is just WRONG!

In Polish:

Cyrus: Żyjemy jak pies z kotem.
Hili: Dokładnie.

 

Republicans take North Carolina to hell in a handbasket

June 15, 2015 • 3:00 pm

Traditionally one of the more liberal Southern states, North Carolina has been going down the tubes since the state government turned Republican in 2013. It’s got a Republican governor (Pat McCrory), and both houses of the legislature are majority Republican. That hasn’t happened since the Civil War!

One of the most obvious signs of this hegemony is how the state is dismantling what has long been an excellent state system of higher education, something my colleagues in North Carolina report to me regularly. Perceiving a “liberal bias” in state education (probably true given the conservative bent of the state’s inhabitants), the legislature has closed institutes dealing with poverty and biodiversity, forced the president of the Universities of North Carolina to resign (he was a Democrat), and replaced most of the University’s Board of Governors with Republicans. Some legislators tried to do away with tenure, and faculty at state universities haven’t had a raise in about five years.

This is what Republicans do when they control a state. The latest shenanigans, as reported in The New York Times, involve gay marriage. Both houses of the legislature have passed a law that permits a state officials to deny marriage licenses and refuse to perform marriages of gay people if those acts defy the religious sentiments of that official.

The bizarre aspect of this homophobic law is that it was vetoed by the Republican governor, and both houses of the legislature overrode the veto.

And if the Supreme Court rules this year that gay marriage is a constitutional right, as I expect it will (my prediction is that the ruling will be 6-3 in favor), this law will be unconstitutional, just as Alabama’s current refusal to grant licenses for same-sex marriage violates a federal court order. Everything’s on hold until the Supreme Court rules. But the Republicans are busy doing damage on other fronts:

The measure is one of a string of bills in states like Indiana, Arkansas and Louisiana to allow people to circumvent equal protection for same-sex couples on grounds of religious freedom. It is also part of a series of sharply conservative bills passed by North Carolina’s Republican-controlled legislature, including a bill signed last Friday by the governor that requires women who seek abortions to wait 72 hours before they can undergo the procedure.

Here’s Rachel Maddow on June 2 talking about the law, and noting that it has ramifications beyond gay marriage: it could permit refusals to allow marriages between people of different faiths, or even different races, based on religious conviction. As the Times notes, “However, the bill itself contains no language about same-sex marriage, leaving open the possibility that it could be used to refuse to perform any marriage for any reason.”

And so proceeds, as one of my colleagues in the state noted, “The Alabamafication of North Carolina.”

Pope Francis’s Encyclical: The Movie

June 15, 2015 • 1:00 pm

I remember when Archie Bunker used to talk about the “Pope’s Bicycle” (he also said the Pope was “inflammable”). Archie was of course referring to encyclicals, or letters from the pontiff sent to all Catholic bishops.  You might know that Pope Francis’s Bicycle on Climate Change, due to be published in three days, was leaked to the press and has appeared in the Italian magazine L’Espresso (it’s 192 pages long, so I suspect it’s excerpted).  Apparently it accepts and decries climate change as an anthropogenic phenomenon, and one that weighs most heavily on the poor.

That’s all well and good, but if you don’t have time to read the behemoth document, you can see the precis in this exciting trailer. Apparently it’s going to be an action movie! (According to Grist, this “was created by the Brazilian climate action group Observatório do Clima.”)

Jebus is in there, too!

h/t: David