A parti-colored squirrel

November 24, 2013 • 3:57 pm

This squirrel, whose photo was sent in by reader Craig, looks as it if fell into some bleach.  It is probably a mosaic for leucism, though it could also be a true albino in its nether parts (I’m guessing the former).

There are two possibilities here. One, perhaps less likely, is that the zygote of this animal was homozygous for leucism or albinism. (Leucism and albinism involve different recessive genes altering pigmentation. I’ve seen albino squirrels, and I know there are also white squirrels with leucism.)One of the “white” alleles could have mutated to its wild-type form in the embryonic head region during development, giving it a normal color in that part of the body.

Alternatively, the animal could have been heterozygous for either the melanism or leucism allele (one copy of a white-color allele, the other copy for normal color), but then one of its “wild-type” alleles mutated to the white form during development, making it white behind the neck.

There are probably other genetic possibilities at all, but I’m too tired to think of them.

Perhaps a reader can tell us which gene has mutated here, though I suspect you’d have to genotype the animal. If the head were white and the eyes were pink, it would certainly be an albino.

Leucistic squirrel

Forbes goes after The Chopra

November 24, 2013 • 1:52 pm

Perhaps this is a bit self-aggrandizing, but I’ll note it anyway. Steven Salzberg, a professor of Biostatistics and director of the Center for Computational Biology at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, has written a post for Forbes called “Deepak Chopra gets upset, tries the Harvard gambit.” It’s largely about Deepak’s trying to pwn me by touting his credentials, but Salzberg gets his own licks in.

Chopra’s claim that photons have consciousness, I have to say, is the purest nonsense. Does Chopra even know what a photon is? (Doubtful: he’s been throwing around the term “quantum” for decades with apparently no understanding of what it means.)  Chopra says this sort of stuff all the time; Coyne also gives us this example:

“The gaia hypothesis says nature does have a mind, that the globe is conscious.”

So both photons and the entire planet are conscious. I can see why Coyne called this psychobabble. If Chopra doesn’t want to be ridiculed, he shouldn’t make ridiculous claims. (He also claims that telepathy is a serious research topic. Right.)

Chopra has become very wealthy spouting this kind of nonsense. His website heavily promotes his line of nutritional supplements, books, videos, and seminars (which he calls “meditation experiences”). He’s particularly fond of Ayurvedic supplements, which he claims provide a wide range of vague health benefits. One example: $35 for a 25-ounce bottle of fruit juice called Zrii (or 2 ounces for $4.75). This is little more than modern snake oil.

Visiting Chopra’s website is a deep dive into the world of pseudoscience. Jerry Coyne got this one exactly right – which is not surprising, because he went to Harvard.

I had visited The Chopra’s website only briefly, so I missed all the woo-ish goodies, but, inspired by Salzberg’s post, I made a longer visit to the Chopra Marketplace.  Oh, the goodies that lie within! Here are but a few ways that The Chopra Regimen can improve your life:

Cleanse and detoxify yourself!

Picture 5

Rejuvinate your nervous system and become more fertile at the same time. It’s also an aphrodisiac!

Picture 1

Scavenge those nasty free radicals, and improve your digestion at the same time!

Picture 3

Boost your metabolism and lose weight! (What a crock!)Picture 6

And (I can hardly say this without laughing): GUGGULU!  Clean out those “unhealthy tissues,” raise your white blood cell count, and rejuvinate your skin. (It also helps you lose weight and “cool inflamed joints.”)

Picture 2

Remember, Chopra flaunts his credentials as an M.D. I wonder how many of these health claims have been tested in double-blind studies?

But wait–there’s more! For only twenty-four bucks you can have your own Deepak-approved double-walled tea tumbler, embellished with a soothing lotus bud and some Tibetan symbols.

Picture 7

For a man who boasts of his impeccable scientific credentials, he sure pushes some weird remedies.

Eagles in Idaho

November 24, 2013 • 11:58 am

Reader Stephen Barnard sends photos of bald eagles, and the laws of physics have determined that I post them. His notes:

The eagles at Aubrey Spring Ranch appear to be taking over a nest in the  heron rookery (Their long-time nest tree blew down on July 4.) One of  them is apparently bringing in nest material. It may be interesting when the herons return in the spring. They don’t get along.

RT9A1949

RT9A1977

Pastor: JFK’s death, like that of Jesus, was all for the best

November 24, 2013 • 9:50 am

The Washington Post’s “On Faith” column is, for atheists, a mixed bag.  They do publish some good stuff by unbelievers like Susan Jacoby, but it’s mixed with religious nonsense ranging from the mildly irritating to the outright disturbing. Tuesday’s column, “True believers: What JFK’s death did,” by Henry G. Brinton, is in the last category.  (Brinton is described as “pastor of Fairfax Presbyterian Church in Virginia and author of “The Welcoming Congregation: Roots and Fruits of Christian Hospitality.“)

While he takes pains to distinguish JFK from Jesus (the former, after all, was an adulterer), Brinton nevertheless tries to pry some good out of what was a tragedy—and he does this by comparing JFK’s death to that of Jesus. In the end, he practices theodicy: evil exists because it creates net good.  But let us hear from Brinton:

The assassination was a hinge in history, on par with Pearl Harbor and 9-11. It pivoted America from the calm of the 1950s to the upheaval of the 1960s.

But terribly shocking tragedies can have unexpectedly good results. Christians understand this, which is why we put crosses in our churches and around our necks. The cross of Jesus Christ is a reminder of a horrible death that had beneficial results.

Now JFK was no Christ-figure — far from it. Christians believe that Jesus was sinless, while JFK had deep personal flaws that undermined his reputation. But his death, like the death of Jesus, changed history for the better.

Initially, reaction to Kennedy’s assassination was nationwide shock and sorrow. Then the American people rallied around his vision of putting a man on the moon by supporting the Apollo program. JFK’s call for civil rights was amplified by his successor Lyndon Johnson, who invoked Kennedy’s memory as he advocated for the Civil Rights Act.

In the end, the death of JFK was not only a tragedy but a catalyst. I believe that it led to advances that might have become bogged down, or not occurred at all, if Kennedy had served two full terms during the chaos and conflict of the 1960s.

Well, the Apollo program was in place beforehand, and was partly proposed to make up for JFK’s failure with the Bay of Pigs invasion: a way to challenge the Soviets in space instead of in Cuba.  And although Johnson sometimes invoked JFK when pushing through the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in truth that was almost entirely Johnson’s own initiative, and he leveraged it using many machinations besides JFK’s death (see Robert Caro’s latest volume of Johnson’s biography, The Passage of Power). To be sure, Johnson may not have been electable had Kennedy not been killed, and so while the Civil Rights act was inevitable, it was probably speeded up considerably by JFK’s death.

But why try to find good at all in something that was a tragedy? Would Brinton say the world is actually better off because JFK was killed? If not, what is his point? After all, there are far more tragedies on this planet that have no good side at all, like the many people who die in natural disasters or the children who die from infections and cancer.

The point, of course, is to highlight the good that came from Jesus’s death. But scripture tells us that Jesus’s death was not really a tragedy, for it wasn’t the action of a disaffected killer but the deliberate plan of a benevolent God to save humanity. Dragging Jesus into the JFK assassination is a completely unnecessary way to push Brinton’s religious delusions on us. Nevertheless, he can’t help himself:

To find a benefit in tragedy seems counterintuitive, perhaps even scandalous.

But the followers of Jesus Christ now make up the world’s largest religious group, with more than 2 billion adherents. They accept the tragic death of Jesus as part of their religious history, and understand — in a variety of ways — that the evil that was done to him eventually resulted in great good.

On a practical level, Christians are motivated to fight injustice because it was a completely innocent Jesus who was nailed to a cross with criminals on either side of him. Across the country, for example, people are now working with the Innocence Project to exonerate wrongly convicted individuals.

The “evil” that was done to Jesus was planned by an loving God to give us a way out of Original Sin. It is nothing like the assassination of JFK, which was not planned to save humanity. Further, I know the people who founded the Innocence Project, and they aren’t Christians but secular Jewish atheists.  They are not in the least motivated by religion, much less Jesus: they’re motivated by secular reason, a knowledge of forensics, and a secular morality.

Infected by the religious virus, Brinton goes on:

Religiously-motivated movements can have national implications — as significant as the Civil Rights Act and moon landing that followed Kennedy’s death. Anglican Archbishop Desmond Tutu led the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in post-apartheid South Africa, which allowed victims and perpetrators to speak in public hearings and move toward reconciliation. Such a Christian focus on forgiveness comes from what Jesus said about his killers from the cross, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing” (Luke 23:34).

Could such good have been done without a violent death? Perhaps. But the assassination of JFK, like the crucifixion of Jesus, is both a shock and a stimulus. One death motivated the American people to work for progress, while the other continues to inspire Christians to fight injustice and do the hard work of forgiveness and reconciliation.

Of course Brinton neglects the religiously motivated movements that have had horrible consequences, including the Troubles in Northern Ireland, the eternal wars between Shiites and Sunnis, the downing of the World Trade Center. What good came from those tragedies? Did the violent deaths of 3,000 people in Manhattan, and the thousands more, guilty and innocent, who died in the resulting war in Afghanistan, have a silver lining? If there is one, I can’t see it. Brinton comes perilously close here to saying that JFK’s death was, in the main, a good thing. He forgets about the wife deprived of a husband, a family deprived of a brother or son, and the children deprived of a father.

He closes with this:

The anniversary of JFK’s death is a sign, like a cross in a church. It points us toward the possibility that death is not the end, and that good can come out of evil.

Yes, good can come of evil: Mothers Against Drunk Driving was founded by a mother whose child was killed by such a driver.  But good doesn’t always come from evil or tragedy—in fact, the vast majority of the time it doesn’t. The rest is just the senseless and unrequited misery and death inevitable in a material world containing immoral people. And a lot of that evil can, according to Pastor Brinton’s lights, be laid at God’s doorstep.

If God really was good, he would have brought about the Civil Rights Act by softening JFK’s heart and getting him to work more closely with LBJ—not by allowing JFK to be assassinated. God could have deflected Oswald’s bullets. Or was it His plan that the assassination take place so that we could have a Moon landing and civil rights? I’d love to ask Brinton this: if God is good, why do most horrible deaths not have beneficial results? And aren’t there other ways to get those results without suffering?

Finally, to compare eternal life with the Civil Rights Act is simply invidious.  One is a tangible and beneficial change in morality; the other a religious fiction.

h/t: Diane G

Holiday snaps: Kentucky

November 24, 2013 • 7:15 am

Here are a few shots from my visit to Murray State University, in Murray, Kentucky. The visit was sponsored by two secular organizations, the Murray State Free-Thinkers Society and the Student Organization for Reason and Science, as well as the university’s Department of Biology.

The talks went pretty well, I think: the turnout was about 140 for each of the two, and the attendees donated about $130 to Doctors Without Borders (I also donated my honorarium to that organization). It was lots of fun, but one could sense that the nonbelievers in that town felt pretty beleaguered by their hyper-religious surroundings. But the secular students were a cheerful and optimistic lot, and some of the post-talk comments I got from the audience suggested that the area harbors a lot of closeted heathens—typical of the South.

Here’s what I saw on the way into Murray from the Paducah airport, an hour away:

Flag

For you non-Yanks, that’s the Confederate flag, the official standard of the South during the Civil War. Since the war was largely about slavery, it’s seen by many as a symbol of continuing racism, and there is always controversy about whether it should be flown or displayed. But a fair number of Southerners are proud of the flag—perhaps they see it more as a sign of independence than of racism.

After my second talk, we repaired to the house of a local retired professor, who laid on a sumptuous buffet of barbecue (pulled pork and ribs), corn pudding, baked beans, salad, homemade bread and Italian sauce for dipping (the last two made by Bill Zingrone, faculty advisor to both secular groups) and the obligatory but superfluous vegetables.  Oh, and there was also moonshine: privately distilled hard liquor.

It came, as is traditional for moonshine, in Mason jars. This brand is called “apple pie,” as they add apple juice and spices to cut the alcohol (most moonshine, also called “white lightning,” is simply white raw whisky). This brand was delicious: it went down easily but had the kick of a mule:

Moonshine

When I was leaving at the end of the night, I noticed that one of the secular students, Courtney, was wearing a cat dress, which, I learned, she’d worn just for my talk:

Courtney

When I admired her frock, the students told her to show me her tattoos, and she obliged. On her right arm was this tree of life, which you’ll recognize as coming from Darwin’s notebooks (which also has the words “I think” written above it). It was the first representation in history of a branching phylogeny.  The tattoo also has Darwin’s signature below.

Courtney tattoo 2

On her left arm was a magnificent quartet of Darwin’s finches. I hope Carl Zimmer puts these in his gallery of science tattoos.

Courtney tattoo

Another student, Evan, had a fancy tattoo with both a tree of life and DNA:

Evan tattoo

Here’s Bill Zingrone with his car, sporting a host of science-y and atheist bumper stickers. I’m amazed that they weren’t defaced, but he says that he’s often stopped by people who admire the stickers—more signs of closet atheists. (Bill has his own secular website, which, like mine, covers a diversity of topics; it’s called “Dispatches from the New Enlightenment.“)

Zingrone

This is a recipe for an altercation in Kentucky:

P1040829 (1)

The next day, on the way to the airport, we repaired to Starnes Restaurant, perhaps the most famous BBQ joint in Paducah. Here, in front of the place, is my student host, Ben Shelby. Ben, who used to be a homeschooled and devout Baptist, has an amazing “conversion” story that perhaps he’ll recount in these pages:

Starnes Ben

The place looks pretty spiffy from the outside for a BBQ joint, as they’re traditionally grubby and plain (after all, the food is what matters), but on the inside it’s closer to the mean:

Starnes inside

Lunch: pulled pork BBQ sandwich, potato salad, vinegar slaw, and, of course, sweet tea:

BBQ

For dessert there was a choice of homemade pies. It was hard to choose between the house specialties: chocolate cream, coconut meringue, pecan, and peanut butter pie, but I chose the last since you get it only rarely outside the South. It’s a wonderful pie, and should be available more widely (try one of the many recipes online):

Pie

Each table had a really cute salt-and-pepper holder in which old parts were formed into the shape of a pig. I believe the pig’s body is a drawer pull or a doorknob:

S&P holders

The downtown section of Paducah, next to the Ohio River, is actually quite quaint and artsy, and I spotted several old stores that indicated that the area once had a Jewish presence. Here’s one indicator, and nearby was an old store named “Cohen’s”.

Finkels

After lunch we set out for my one remaining goal: to find the grave of John T. Scopes, of “Scopes Monkey Trial” fame. Scopes was from Paducah, and is buried there in Oak Grove Cemetery. After a half-hour search (it’s a large cemetery!), Ben spotted it.  Scopes and his wife are buried next to his parents.

Family tombstone

The obligatory vanity photo. I suppose my smile was out of place, but I was happy to have found the site:

TombstoneJPG

“A man of courage.” The trial was in 1925, so he was only 24 years old at the time. It’s amazing to realize that he was still alive when I was in my twenties. I should have sought him out to shake his hand.

Here’s Scopes as a young man. After the trial he went on to get a graduate degree in geology (from the University of Chicago!), and spent the rest of his life working for oil and gas companies:

3526_1058408170

Outside the cemetery is a marker commemorating its most famous resident:

Marker 1

Marker 2

Finally, as we headed to the airport, I noticed that the cemetery had—FREE WIRELESS! Why on earth this is necessary baffles me, but Ben pointed out that it could be used to test the possibility of an afterlife. Simply bury someone with their laptop and see if they email from the grave:

Wireless

 So it’s farewell to Kentucky. I had a great trip and am most grateful to my sponsors and my hosts, especially Ben and Bill, for their hospitality and the hard work they did to prepare for my visit, which included replacing the defaced posters.

WWJD?

Sunday: Hili dialogue

November 24, 2013 • 4:30 am
Hili: Do existential questions induce humans to meowing?
A: Not really.
Hili: Maybe we cats experience it somehow differently.

1463093_10202149503886399_1491632319_n

In Polish:

Hili: Czy egzystencjalne pytania skłaniają ludzi do miauczenia?
Ja: Raczej nie.
Hili: Może my, koty, przeżywamy to jakoś inaczej.

The Hili Tumblr site has been updated, and if you go to the archive, you can see early Hili dialogues (when she was a tiny diva kitten) that haven’t appeared here. Also, if you have a question for The Furry Navel of the World, there’s an “Ask Hili” box (she will answer, on the Tumblr, whatever questions move her).

A lovely post from a Christian

November 23, 2013 • 12:57 pm

This comment—with the appended name “Kenneth Lovette” (I don’t know if that’s the person’s real name, but the name has an interesting history if you Google it)—arrived a few days ago. Naturally the chap won’t be allowed to post regularly, but I’ll give him his one shot. This comment was intended to follow the “Where are all the dead gods?” post from two years ago. I reproduce it exactly as it arrived.

God Almighty Father of ALL Creation and His Son Jesus, first begotten will share with you all that you have ever thought, said, or done when you stand in Judgement on the LAST DAY . look around you oh foolish one’s and tell me there is no SON OF GOD KICKING THIS PLANET AND IT’S NON BELIEVING PEOPLES ASS!!! Truly you shall be judged yea Antichrists , for there shall be many non believers in the end times. One more thing God Almighty OWNED THE GREEK INFERIOR GODLETTE’S!!!

I love that  “God Almighty Greek OWNED THE GREEK INFERIOR GODELETTE’S!!!”, with the possessive. That, of course, refers to the famous Mencken quote that started of my piece.

Perhaps this is a joke, but I don’t think so.

Do people really think that this kind of rant can turn us into Christians? Or are they just puffing themselves up?