Angel

July 3, 2014 • 5:34 am

I missed Canada Day on Tuesday (it’s July 1)! But I believe I did post a Canadian singer then: the incomparable Sarah McLachlan. Apologies to my friends up north, even if they do install the toilet paper backwards.

To make reparations, I’m posting another great song by McLachlan: the famous “Angel,” recorded in 1997 and performed below in her home studio with just voice and piano. Clearly she didn’t need much else, for this is a superb and intimate performance.

The song is clearly about drug addiction, but the Wikpedia article gives a bit more information:

As McLachlan explained on VH1 Storytellers, the song is about the Smashing Pumpkins touring keyboard player Jonathan Melvoin, who overdosed on heroin and died in 1996.

. . . “Angel” was one of the first songs written for Surfacing. McLachlan said that writing it was easy, “a real joyous occasion.” It was inspired by articles that she read in Rolling Stone about musicians turning to heroin to cope with the pressures of the music industry and subsequently overdosing. She said that she identified with the feelings that might lead someone to use heroin: “I’ve been in that place where you’ve messed up and you’re so lost that you don’t know who you are anymore, and you’re miserable—and here’s this escape route. I’ve never done heroin, but I’ve done plenty of other things to escape.” She said that the song is about “trying not to take responsibility for other people’s problems and trying to love yourself at the same time”.

 

 

 

Readers’ wildlife photos

July 3, 2014 • 5:04 am

Reader Tony Eales from Brisbane, Oz, sent three pictures. Every bird here is new to me:

A Blue-Faced Honeyeater (Entomyzon cyanotis) kissing its reflection.

IMG_2871

One of my hands down favourite birds: Red Tailed Black Cockatoos (Calyptorhynchus banksii banksii) which spend hours deftly picking out dust-sized seeds from gum nuts, in this case Corymbia torelliana which is a bit of an invasive weed around here.

Red_tailed_Black_Cockatoo

A couple of Dusky Moorhens (Gallinula tenebrosa) fighting, although someone pointed out they look like they might be relaxing in a spa.

IMG_3878

The FFRF’s ad against the Hobby Lobby decision

July 2, 2014 • 1:31 pm

The Freedom from Religion Foundation (FFRF) has paid for a full-page ad to run in the July 3 issue of the New York Times, protesting the Supreme Court’s decision that two companies could, on religious grounds, opt out of covering female employees’ contraception. A small screenshot of the ad is below; click on it to see the full pdf.

Screen shot 2014-07-02 at 2.56.50 PM

These ads are hugely expensive but visible; do consider joining or contributing to this worthy organization (you can do so here).

 

More on the kidnapping and murder of Israeli teenagers (and now a Palestinian one)

July 2, 2014 • 11:51 am

As I expected, there was a lot of contention about my post yesterday that accused Hamas of kidnapping and killing three Israeli teenagers. I was generally pleased with the polite tone of all the comments, though I had to ban several people for insulting the host (one even had the temerity to tell me that the topic had nothing to do with evolution!).  In the future, please stick to the topic and avoid saying things to me that you wouldn’t say in my living room, which of course is what this website is. And read “Da Roolz”, which you can find on the sidebar. And try to keep a lid on your anger.

My original claim that the kidnappers were from Hamas has not yet been verified, so, as I noted in an update yesterday, my claim is actually in limbo. Yet Israel has identified two men associated with Hamas, Marwan Qawasmeh and Amer Abu Aisheh, as suspects, and they’re nowhere to be found.

The Times of Israel reports, though, that Hamas doen’st really actually deny responsibility, nor do they seem too upset about the teenagers’ murders. In fact, they’re happy about it. Look at the palpable and sickening glee expressed by the head of Hamas about the murders (my emphasis):

Hamas chief Khaled Mashaal on Monday praised the June 12 kidnapping of three Israeli teenagers as a heroic act but denied having any information on the abduction

In a lengthy interview with Al-Jazeera on Monday evening, Mashaal insisted that Gil-ad Shaer, Naftali Fraenkel and Eyal Yifrach, abducted while hitchhiking in the Etzion Bloc south of Jerusalem, were “settlers and soldiers in the Israeli army.”

“No one claimed responsibility so far. I can neither confirm [Hamas’s responsibility] nor deny it,” Mashaal said, quickly adding that the circumstances of the kidnapping were more important than the perpetrators.

“Blessed be the hands that captured them,” Mashaal said. “This is a Palestinian duty, the responsibility of the Palestinian people. Our prisoners must be freed; not Hamas’s prisoners — the prisoners of the Palestinian people.”

The “disappearance,” as he termed it, took place in the West Bank, an area he said was considered occupied “even by the United States.” Secondly, the three were not “youths, as Israel calls them, but first and foremost settlers … and not even regular settlers, but armed ones.”

. . . Mashaal blamed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the abduction, lambasting his insensitivity to the plight of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners on hunger strike.

“I ask the families of these three soldier-settlers: Had Netanyahu heard the voice of these hunger strikers … would the Palestinian situation be so stressed? … had Netanyahu not provoked us in Jerusalem by Judaizing it, would Palestinians be as angry?”

Contrary to Mashaal’s claim, these teenagers were not soldiers (they were going to school), and only one of them lived over the “green line,” in the occupied territories. Note, too that Mashaal blames Israel for the murders. He’s an odious man.

At least one website gives plausible reasons why Hamas would deny the kidnapping: because it was a botched operation, a kidnapping designed to ransom Palestinian prisoners, but one that went wrong when the kidnappers were forced to kill three victims instead of the one they intended to random. Hamas has apparently published handbooks on how to kidnap Israelis to facilitate prisoner exchange.

In another sickening twist on this story, a Palestinian teenager has been killed and his body dumped in a Jerusalem forest. It’s not yet clear whether this was done by Israelis to avenge the murder of the three teenagers (one source reports that it may have been an honor killing), but if it is a revenge killing, it’s as monstrous and brutal as the murder of the three teenagers. Israelis have no moral high ground if they, too, deliberately target and kill innocent civilians. We’ll simply have to wait to see what happened with all four of these murders.

But, as the New York Times reports, Israeli officials, unlike Mashaal, show no glee over this latest killing:

Mr. Netanyahu spoke before noon with Mr. Aharonovich, the internal security minister, and requested that “investigators act as quickly as possible to find out who stands behind the despicable murder,” according to a statement from the prime minister’s office. Mr. Netanyahu called on all sides not to take the law into their own hands, saying, “Israel is a state of law and everybody is obligated to act according to the law.”

. . . The mayor of Jerusalem, Nir Barkat, condemned the killing of the teenager in a statement.

“This is a horrible and barbaric act which I strongly condemn,” he said. “This is not our way and I am fully confident that our security forces will bring the perpetrators to justice. I call on everyone to exercise restraint.”

Compare that to the Palestinian celebrations that inevitably follow the murder of Israeli civilians.

 

 

 

 

Chopra and Cox enter the box

July 2, 2014 • 9:33 am

Well, Brian Cox has taken the heat off me, for he and Deepakity are going after it on Twi**er.  Cox even got invited to Chopra’s WooFest, but refused:

photo

The video Cox refers to in his first tw**t is Eric Idle’s new song for the Infinite Monkey Cage, Cox’s show:

h/t: Matthew Cobb

Science shows that yetis and Bigfoots are just well-known animals

July 2, 2014 • 8:50 am

But we already knew that, didn’t we? Nevertheless, a new paper by Bryan Sykes et al. in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B (reference and free download below) used sequencing of mitochondrial DNA to examine the origin of hairs purported to be from various cryptozoological critters like Bigfoot and the yeti. You should be able to recognize the species names in the fourth column, but the fifth will tell you.

Their table tells it all:

Picture 1

And the conclusion shows that every sample except for two (which were clearly bears, probably either a polar bear or a Himalayan bear, but couldn’t be definitively placed), are extant and well known REGULAR species:

With the exception of these two samples, none of the submitted and analysed hairs samples returned a sequence that could not be matched with an extant mammalian species, often a domesticate. While it is important to bear in mind that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence and this survey cannot refute the existence of anomalous primates, neither has it found any evidence in support. Rather than persisting in the view that they have been ‘rejected by science’, advocates in the cryptozoology community have more work to do in order to produce convincing evidence for anomalous primates and now have the means to do so. The techniques described here put an end to decades of ambiguity about species identification of anomalous primate samples and seta rigorous standard against which to judge any future claims.

Bye, bye, Bigfoot!

h/t: John Jaenike

_________

Reference: Sykes BC, Mullis RA, Hagenmuller C, Melton TW, Sartori M. 2014. Genetic analysis of hair samples attributed to yeti, bigfoot and other anomalous primates. Proc. R. Soc. B 281: 20140161.