Praise D*g! Jesus shows up in a terrier’s ear.

January 20, 2015 • 3:45 pm

Okay, we’re finishing up today with two lighthearted animal posts. Here’s a good case of pareidolia from the Daily Mail (of course). The headline below shows how far religion has fallen: imagine a major newspaper publishing such a sarcastic headline 50 years ago!

Screen Shot 2015-01-20 at 12.25.20 PM

That’s right: someone found an image of Jebus in their d*g’s ear. The Mail reports:

Rachel Evans, 25, was bathing her mini Yorkshire terrier Dave in the bathroom sink when she took some photographs of the dog enjoying his shower.

However, when she showed the pictures to her boyfriend James Williams, 28, she spotted the face of the Son of God in the pet’s soggy ear.

The Mail has thoughtfully inserted a circle around the miracle:

24D4DCB200000578-0-image-a-1_1421662215615

Dog-lover Miss Evans shares eight-month-old Dave with her house mate Lewis Evans, 24, along with a seven-month-old chihuahua called Gilbert and whippet Flo, one.

The pair hope the divine appearance is a good omen, and she added: ‘We’ve not long moved into the house, so that would be good.’

The Mail has enlarged the ear so you can see Jesus better. To me it looks more like Christopher Reeves:

24D4E1A700000578-2916503-Miss_Evans_had_been_taking_photographs_of_Dave_having_his_shower-a-37_1421675058022

And the paper’s even bigger picture. Praise Him!

24D4D92400000578-2916503-Miss_Evans_said_the_image_of_the_face_was_spooky_and_that_she_wa-a-43_1421675085417

The only question is how long it will take for believers to show up at the Evans-Williams home begging to see the terrier and falling to their knees when they do so. The thing is, the image almost certainly vanished when the d*g dried off.

 

Imagine No Religion 5: June 5-7, now in a new place

January 20, 2015 • 3:15 pm

It may be a bit early to flog this conference, but I suspect that it will sell out early as it’s in Vancouver this year (it’s always been in the much smaller and less accessible town of Kamloops) and because it has some Big Names in Science speaking, namely Richard Dawkins, Carolyn Porco (who gave a fantastic talk at INR4) and Lawrence Krauss.  Here’s the logo and date; click on the screenshot to go to the main website:

Screen Shot 2015-01-20 at 9.06.28 AM

The list of speakers, which is a very good line-up (and I don’t say that because it includes me) is here, and you can buy your tickets here.

I am not in general a huge fan of big secular meetings, but this is one of the best I’ve been to. The schedule is easygoing, the ambiance is informal, there are lots of good noms, there’s a ton of schmoozing (intellectual and otherwise), and you get a lot of chances to interact with the speakers. I, for one, am looking forward to seeing old friends as well as meeting other secularists I’ve admired, like Maryam Namazie and Robert Price.

If you want to go, I suggest anteing up now. It’ll be a good time.

 

My nephew’s 2015 Oscar picks

January 20, 2015 • 2:20 pm

My nephew Steven is a film buff trying to carve out a career as a movie critic in New York. And, against all odds, he seems to be succeeding. So far he’s interviewed three of this year’s Oscar nominees for Film Comment and has written a number of other pieces for that organ. Steven’s latest interview latest is with Alejandro Iñárritu, director of the acclaimed film Birdman (I haven’t yet seen it). The piece is well worth a read, and my nephew has now made me wildly jealous by scoring an interview with Julianne Moore, a Best Actress nominee for her role in Still Alice, and someone whom I’d be delighted to name as Mrs. Professor Ceiling Cat. (You can see the rest of Steven’s pieces here.)

Steven has an almost perfect record of predicting the Oscar winners, so I asked him who he thought would nab the little golden man this year. Here are his choices, covering, I think, every category:

Picture: Boyhood
Director: Richard Linklater, Boyhood
Actor: Michael Keaton, Birdman
Actress: Julianne Moore, Still Alice
Supporting Actor: J.K. Simmons, Whiplash
Supporting Actress: Patricia Arquette, Boyhood
Original Screenplay: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Adapted Screenplay: The Imitation Game
Song: “Glory,” Selma
Foreign Language Film: Ida
Animated Feature: How to Train Your Dragon 2
Documentary Feature: CitizenFour
Score: The Theory of Everything
Production Design: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Cinematography: Birdman
Costume Design: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Film Editing: Boyhood
Makeup and Hairstyling: Guardians of the Galaxy
Sound Mixing: Interstellar
Sound Editing: Interstellar
Visual Effects: Interstellar

We’ll see how he did after the winners are announced on February 22. But on February 13 Steven will announce the nominees for his own award, the “Golden Steve”—a honor that he sees as far superior to an Oscar.

p.s. I was curious about how the golden statue got named the “Oscar.” It turns out that the origin of the name is shrouded in mystery. But it does appear that the statue is based on a nude sculpture of the Mexican film director Emilio “El Indio” Fernández. I can’t resist pointing out that the same Chicago company that makes the Oscars also manufactures a similar gold-plated statue that I have, the Freedom from Religion Foundation’s “Emperor has No Clothes” award.

Canadian government kills First Nations girl out of misguided respect for faith

January 20, 2015 • 11:13 am

The Canadian government has often treated its indigenous people horribly, including taking kids from their family and sticking them in special residential “Indian schools” where they were forbidden to use their language or learn about their culture, and where they were often horribly abused. I saw one of these schools, now closed, when I was in Kamloops last year for the Imagine No Religion conference. Hearing the story, I was horrified.

So, in an admirable effort to make up for past misdeeds, Canada has made a number of accommodations to the people of the “First Nations”, as they call them. But this time they’ve gone too far, and have failed to remove children from their homes when they should have. These children are ill with cancer, and the government endorses “traditional” methods of healing, which inevitably lead to death. The government’s failure to insist on modern medical treatment for First Nations children has caused the death of one girl, and will soon cause the death of another. As the title of this post indicates, I consider this equivalent to murder, or at least manslaughter, for these deaths are entirely predictable and in many cases were preventable.

If that sounds harsh, it’s because I’m hopping mad over this kind of stuff. Courts in the US and now Canada have for far too long respected parents’ (and brainwashed children’s) desire to reject Western medicine in favor of faith healing or “alternative” (i.e., useless) medicine. In nearly every state in the U.S., parents who refuse medical care for their children on religious grounds get serious legal breaks compared to parents who also reject that care but on non-religious grounds. It’s an unconscionable kowtowing to faith, something I’d expect in America but not in Canada, which has always seemed more sensible (and less religious) to me.

The child who was just killed by Canada was Makayla Sault, an 11-year-old member of the Mississauga tribe of the New Credit First Nation in Ontario. She was suffering from acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and died yesterday after the courts refused to intervene and continue her chemotherapy. Her parents took her to a quack institute in Florida for bogus treatment, and there she passed away. Here are the salient facts as reported by both the CBC News and The Globe and Mail.

But first, here’s Makayla while she was alive. Click on the screenshot below to go to the CBC article and a video report on her death:

Screen Shot 2015-01-20 at 8.17.41 AM

Makayla had a good chance of surviving had she continued treatment.  As the CBC notes:

Makayla was given a 75 per cent chance of survival when she was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in March. She underwent 11 weeks of chemotherapy at McMaster Children’s Hospital in Hamilton.

Her parents were religious (both were pastors) and chose to discontinue treatment in favor of alternative treatments. They don’t regret their decision that lead to her death. Again from the CBC:

After Makayla said she had a vision of Jesus in the hospital, she wrote a letter to her doctors asking to stop treatment.

“I am writing this letter to tell you that this chemo is killing my body and I cannot take it anymore.”

She left chemotherapy treatment while in remission to pursue alternative and traditional indigenous medicine.

And from the Globe and Mail:

Makayla, who suffered from acute lymphoblastic leukemia, stopped chemotherapy in May because of the side effects of the drug. She had told her parents, Ken and Sonya Sault, who are pastors, that Christ had appeared in her hospital room to tell her she was healed.

. . . Mr. LaForme said her parents are holding up well considering their loss and do not regret taking Makayla off chemotherapy.

“From Day One they have never regretted the decision,” he said. “As a matter of fact, they wish that they had never even gone through the chemo in the first place.”

I’ve studied many of these cases—they figure largely in the last chapter of my Faith versus Fact—and one common feature of parents whose children die after they receive faith healing or alternative medicine is this: a curious lack of parental affect and regret. “I am a good parent,” they often say. They’re not; they’re ignorant parents who, if they really wanted to save the child’s life, would do the proper legwork.  In fact:

The parents self-servingly blame Makayla’s death on the chemotherapy. From the CBC:

“Makayla was on her way to wellness, bravely fighting toward holistic well-being after the harsh side-effects that 12 weeks of chemotherapy inflicted on her body,” the family statement reads. “Chemotherapy did irreversible damage to her heart and major organs. This was the cause of the stroke.”

They were wrong. Here’s a counter-statement from the same article:

Although her family claims her death was due to chemotherapy, in September, a McMaster oncologist testified that Makayla had suffered a relapse. The doctor also testified that there are no known cases of survival of ALL without a full course of chemotherapy treatment.

And here’s a comment below the CBC story. (I’m not a doctor but show this so that any physician reading this can comment):

Screen Shot 2015-01-20 at 9.45.13 AM

Makayla, and another Ontario First Nations child ill with leukemia, were treated at a quack Florida clinic. From the CBC:

In July, Makayla travelled to the Hippocrates Health Institute in Florida and took its three-week “life transformation program.” A CBC investigation revealed that Hippocrates is licensed as a “massage establishment,” and is being sued by former staff who allege the company’s president Brian Clement is operating “a scam under Florida law” and practising medicine without a licence. 

The other sick child, “J. J.”, is being “treated” at the clinic, and this is what the treatment involves:

In an interview with CBC News, [J.J.’s] mother said, “This was not a frivolous decision I made. Before I took her off chemo, I made sure that I had a comprehensive health-care plan that I was very confident that was going to achieve ridding cancer of her body before I left the hospital. This is not something I think may work, this is something I know will work.”

The girl’s mother said her daughter received cold laser therapy, Vitamin C injections and a strict raw food diet, among other therapies at Hippocrates.

Yeah, that’s some “comprehensive health care plan.” Raw food and cold lasers can totally cure leukemia!

The Canadian Medical Association Journal approves of Makayla’s “treatment.” This is perhaps the most odious part of the whole mess, for Canada’s premier medical association has approved what the parents and government did to this poor child. As The Globe and Mail reports:

Makayla died on the same day that an editorial in the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) said the country’s health-care system must respect aboriginal healing traditions, which are deeply valued ancestral practices.

Authors Lisa Richardson, an internal medicine specialist who is a leader of the University of Toronto’s office of indigenous medical education, and Matthew Stanbrook, a respirologist and deputy editor of the CMAJ, wrote that many indigenous Canadians feel unwelcome or unsafe in regular medical institutions.

“To make medical treatment acceptable to our aboriginal patients, the health-care system must earn their trust by delivering respect,” they wrote. They pointed to J.J.’s case saying, although some people took issue with the judge’s ruling, “it appears to have been a thoughtful decision addressing a complex area of law.”

“Thoughtful”? Really? If you can bear it, go over and look at that article (free online), “Caring for Aboriginal patients requires trust and respect, not courtrooms.” It’s a sickening paean to the worst aspects of multiculturalism: the assumption that all beliefs are equally worthy of respect. Here’s a quote from Richardson and Stanbrook’s article:

Medical science is not specific to a single culture, but is shared by Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people alike. Most Aboriginal people seek care from health professionals — but nearly half also use traditional medicines. Aboriginal healing traditions are deeply valued ancestral practices that emphasize plant-based medicines, culture and ceremony, multiple dimensions of health (physical, mental, emotional and spiritual), and relationships between healer, patient, community and environment. These beliefs create expectations that Aboriginal patients bring to their health care encounters; these must be respected. Doing so is not political correctness — it is patient-centred care.

No, it’s not patient-centered care; it’s culture-centered care, meant to treat a culture rather than the sick. And it’s political correctness of the worst stripe: a form that can be fatal. It is kowtowing to false beliefs for fear of offending an ethnic minority.

It disgusts me that two Canadian physicians can endorse “alternative medicine” because modern medicine causes distrust in some native peoples.  But really, is securing trust among all of them worth the lives of their children? How can Makayla’s parents live with themselves knowing that their daughter had a substantial chance of still being alive had they trusted modern medicine? Are they inhuman? No, they’re human; they were just corrupted by their faith.

And Canada, your government sucks. How many more children must die before you curb your own unwarranted approbation of faith?

h/t: Taskin, Christopher M.

ADDENDUM:

I posted last November about Canadian judge Gethin Edward’s decision to reject a request from a Hamilton hospital to continue “J.J.’s” chemotherapy after her family wanted it discontinued in favor of “traditional medicine”. The judge said this:

“I cannot find that J.J. is a child in need of protection when her substitute decision-maker has chosen to exercise her constitutionally protected right to pursue their traditional medicine over the Applicant’s stated course of treatment of chemotherapy,” Edward said, as he read his ruling aloud.

 

We need another Hollow Cost

January 20, 2015 • 9:42 am

This is a picture from Reuters, via Yahoo News, and it’s not a fake. The caption:

Supporters of the Al Muhammadia religious group chant slogans as they hold sign during a protest against satirical French weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo, which featured a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammad as the cover of its first edition since an attack by Islamist gunmen, in Peshawar January 19, 2015. The sign reads in Urdu, “We martyr for the Prophet’s sanctity.” REUTERS/Fayaz Aziz (PAKISTAN)

Supporters of the Al Muhammadia religious group chant slogans as they hold sign during a protest against satirical French weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Peshawar

I wonder what Karen Armstrong would say about this? Oh wait, I know: “They’re acting in the name of what they think is their religion, but it’s not the real of Islam.” If you think that’s a distortion of her thoughts, I’ll post an interview with her this week in which she says something along these lines.

h/t: Malgorzata

Bizarre family court ruling: go to mass

January 20, 2015 • 8:45 am

by Grania Spingies

This story floated to the top of the pile of court news last evening in the UK. The Telegraph reports that Judge James Orrell of Derby County in the Midlands has put a rather bizarre stipulation on a divorce settlement, a stipulation apparently not sought by either party to the case. The ex-wife is Catholic, and the stipulation has apparently not been applied to her:

A judge has ordered a father to take his children to Roman Catholic mass as part of a divorce settlement, even though he is not Catholic.

The man, who can only be identified as “Steve” because of reporting restrictions on the case, faces possible contempt of court and a jail sentence if he fails to go to church when he has custody of the children.

It is not clear why the judge decided to go this route, but it’s not the first time this family court judge has made headlines for strange decisions. Back in 2011, he chose to remove a child from its parents after only 15 minutes of hearing; that case was later overturned by an Appeal Court.

Although the father in the new case appealed the “mass” sentence on the grounds that his human rights were breached under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects freedom of thought, conscience and religion, his application was not successful. It seems that it is not only his rights that are being ignored here; as he says;

“My oldest son, who is now 10, has already expressed a clear lack of belief but legally I am required to take him to Roman Catholic mass at Christmas.”

As someone who had countless tedious and frustrating hours of my youth wasted by the never-ending cycle of repetitive prayers and rituals at my local Catholic church, the father and child have all my sympathy. This is a ridiculous, condescending and insulting decision. There is no reason why the religious party to a marriage should get the legal nod and sanction (although in this case she may not have even asked for it) while and the non-believer is relegated to the status of second-class citizen.

One can only speculate as to what judges think they are doing when they decide to force religion on people in a civil case or otherwise. Religion has never been the Great Ennobler of our species, and especially in a secular country it is a private choice. It is not something that any judge has any business forcing on someone—certainly not with the threat of jail-time to back it up. It is the kind of decision you would expect to see handed down by a court in a crazed theocracy.

 

h/t: Coel, Pyers

Readers’ wildlife photos

January 20, 2015 • 8:00 am

My friend Andrew Berry, who teaches evolutionary biology at Harvard, has gone to New Zealand and informs me that he’s taken some holiday snaps that he’s posted on Google+. I’ve picked one species from them: the kea (Nestor notabilis), an inquisitive and mischievous parrot with a bill so strong and dextrous that several of them can pick the chrome off a car. They also rip open the backs of sheep and consume the fat. As far as I know, they’re the world’s only semi-carnivorous parrot. According to the unimpeachable authority of Wikipedia, the kea is also “the world’s only alpine parrot.”

A snap from Arthur’s pass. Look at that beak!

NZ15005

A pair:

NZ15023

I love this proud beast. If it wrote an autobiography, would it be called I, Kea?

NZ15017

And, of course, they have to examine everything with an eye towards its destruction:

NZ15019

NZ15024

This must be the only sign of its kind. Note that it’s anatomically correct:

NZ15006

And, from the Auckland Museum, we have an artifact rather than an organism, but I couldn’t resist. This is the ice axe used by Edmund Hillary on his ascent of Mt. Everest (Andrew has also inadvertently taken a self portrait):

NZ15069

 

Morning LOL with Deepak

January 20, 2015 • 6:36 am

When reader Ant sent me a link to this tw**t by Deepak, I realized that I had no choice but to post it, for, like all of us, I lack free will. But if I need to confabulate, I have no choice but to add that Deepak’s lucubrations are a very reliable source of amusement.

Check out this nice Deepity which Chopra uses to tout his new book The Future of God—and he’s been touting furiously all over social media. The Amazon summary:

Can God be revived in a skeptical age? What would it take to give people a spiritual life more powerful than anything in the past? Deepak Chopra tackles these issues with eloquence and insight in this book.  He proposes that God lies at the source of human awareness. Therefore, any person can find the God within that transforms everyday life.

Screen Shot 2015-01-20 at 6.31.42 AM

B7wOQb5CAAAMC1o

Umm. . . .I think Chopra has a problem with the word “know” (and maybe “mystical”, too).