What motivates ISIS?: a short interview with a Middle East expert

November 4, 2015 • 10:24 am

Here from PBS Newshour is an interview of historian Will McCants by Margaret Warner. McCants works for the Brookings Institution, a respected think tank in Washington, D.C.; his page there describes him like this:

. . . .a fellow in the Center for Middle East Policy and director of the Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World. He is also an adjunct faculty member at Johns Hopkins University and has served in government and think tank positions related to Islam, the Middle East, and terrorism, including as State Department senior adviser for countering violent extremism. He is the author of “Founding Gods, Inventing Nations: Conquest and Culture Myths from Antiquity to Islam”(Princeton University Press, 2011) and “The ISIS Apocalypse: The History, Strategy, and Doomsday Vision of the Islamic State” (St. Martin’s Press, 2015).

In this short  6½-minute chat, McCants discusses his new book, which is doing well on Amazon, and Warner queries him about the motivations of ISIS. She seems taken aback that their motivation seems to be largely religious, even for the organization’s recruits who, while not religious themselves, appear to be swept up in ISIS’s “apocalyptic vision”—a vision derived directly from Islam. They are, he says, intoxicated by “fighting an End-Times battle and absolving their sins.” Is religion at all culpable here? You be the judge.

h/t: Leon

“All shall have prizes and non shall be disappointed”: a teacher writes in about the coddling of American students

November 4, 2015 • 9:00 am
Last night I received this email from a high-school teacher in Texas, who gave me permission to put it up but, for obvious reasons, asked to remain anonymous. Here it is:

In light of recent discussion about the hypersensitivity of college students, you might be interested to hear what just happened at the high school where I teach. The administration announced today that faculty members should refrain from discussing college admissions with students, including those for whom we have written recommendation letters. The reason? “We know that you want to express support for your students during the application process, but by asking them which colleges they have applied to, you are reminding them of the possibility that they might be rejected.”

Perhaps you are retiring at just the right time, because with current high school students being coddled to this extreme, the future crops of college students are likely to be even more fragile than anything we’ve yet seen. It doesn’t bode well for free speech on campuses. And now in Texas, these kids who can’t handle a subtle reminder of even the possibility of rejection are going to be allowed to carry concealed firearms on campus. Soon it’ll be free A’s for everyone, and for more than one reason.

Well, I don’t have much to add. American colleges and high schools have increasingly opted to coddle students, trying to insulate them from the disappointment and offense that they will surely encounter in the real world.  It’s gotten so bad that professors who could support students, or help them during their application to college, aren’t even allowed to discuss college admissions with them. (I went through that process, and know others who are advisors, and to a person they’re supportive and helpful.) I guess when a student says, “Where do you think I might apply, or which college might be best for me?”, you’re supposed to say, “Sorry, I’m forbidden to discuss that.” Apparently the possibility that students might get nervous when reminded about colleges to which they’ve applied outweighs the benefits of giving support or advice to those students.

Though I’ve never encountered the “offense culture” as a teacher of biology, it still disturbs me to see the American educational system everywhere catering to the easily-bruised feelings of students rather than treating them as adults or near-adults. Yes, we have to avoid imposing unwarranted distress on students, but the request of this Texas school is simply silly.

Spot the tree frog!

November 4, 2015 • 8:40 am

Reader Mark Sturtevant sent us a “spot the. . . ” picture. Answer forthcoming in a few hours.

I have placed a single frog that is commonly known as the grey tree frog (Hyla versicolor) somewhere in this garden scene. Can the readers of WEIT find the frog?I assure everyone it is in plain sight. Good luck!

Click to enlarge, with an interval between first and second click:

IMG_3557

Jesus ‘n’ Mo ‘n’ the “dangers” of faith

November 4, 2015 • 8:00 am

The new Jesus and Mo strip, called “Even,” comes with this acknowledgment:

Thanks to Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis and Cardinal Vincent Nichols for their help with this week’s script.

Click on the link provided to see the Torygraph story that inspired the strip. And the last panel tells the tale—the fifth death of a Bangladeshi secularist writer or publisher at the hands of Islamic extremists.

2015-11-04

Readers’ wildlife photos

November 4, 2015 • 7:30 am

We’ll begin with another fall-themed photo: a picture of a solitary tree in Iowa taken by reader Randy Schenck. The Midwest doesn’t get the spectacular fall colors of Vermont or New Hampshire, but they’re often lovely. Do readers in other parts of the world get such spectacular fall displays in deciduous forest?

Trees & Birds 3 Nov. 2015 001

Reader Damon Williford sent some diverse photos:

Attached are some wildlife photos I taken over the last couple of months and for a change its mostly mammals. The first 5 photos are of Atlantic bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). These were taken in Port Aransas, Texas, which is on a barrier island (Mustang Island). There were four dolphins feeding in the an area where the International Ship Channel intersects with the entrance to a public marina.

2015-11-01 Atlantic Bottlenose (Port A marina) 3
2015-11-01 Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphins (Port A marina) 1
2015-11-01 Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphins (Port A marina) fluke
These are collared peccaries (Pecari tajacu) from the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge:
2015-10-03 Collared Peccaries 2 (Aransas NWR)
This is an black-tailed jackrabbit (Lepus californicus) who appears to be very annoyed that I disturbed his sunbathing. This was also taken in Port Aransas.
2015-07-17 Black-tailed Jackrabbit 2 (Port Aransas)
The next 2 are locally common squirrels in southern Texas, including the eastern fox squirrel (Sciurus niger) and the Mexican ground squirrel (Ictidomys mexicanus). I am still not used to the new genus name for the Mexican ground squirrel. It was still lumped in Spermophilus when I took Mammalogy back int he 1990s.
2014-08-10 Eastern Fox Squirrel (Kingsman Apartments)
2015-10-31 Mexican Ground Squirrel (Restland Cemetary)
The last three are of an excited or annoyed House Wren (Troglodytes aedon) from the campus of the university where I work. The breeding range of this species is mostly outside the range of Texas but it does winter in two-thirds of the state. House Wrens are territorial. He/she may have been a recent arrival and was letting everybody know that “This tree is MINE!”
2015-10-17 House Wren (TAMUK) 3
2015-10-17 House Wren (TAMUK) 4
2015-10-17 House Wren (TAMUK) 5

Wednesday: Hili dialogue

November 4, 2015 • 4:49 am

It’s Hump Day already, and the weather has been lovely: sunny and with a high of 71°F (22°C) yesterday, and we’ll have pretty much the same weather today. I’m also pleased to report that my haircut was successful, as they tend to be: superfluous hair was removed, and I was cleaned up. Thank Ceiling Cat it doesn’t happen very often. It’s now 4:45 a.m. and time to report what’s happening in Dobrzyn, where Hili, for once, is on the inside of the windowsill. Can you spot the cat?

A: What are you doing there?
Hili: I’m being decorative.
(Photo: Monika Stogowska)

12202553_10204968358904527_481008778_n

In Polish:
Ja: Co tam robisz?
Hili: Dekoruję.
(Foto: Monika Stogowska)

Stephen Law on scientism

November 3, 2015 • 2:30 pm

On his eponymous website, writer/philosopher Stephen Law has a new post called “Scientism!“. I reproduce it in its entirety:

SCIENTISM: here’s the final paragraph of the chapter I just finished which will appear in Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry’s forthcoming tome Science Unlimited.

I have provided three illustrations of how the charge of scientism is made in a baseless and indeed irrelevant way against some critics of religious and/or supernatural beliefs. It is not difficult to find many more. In the hands of some – including many theologians – the charge of ‘scientism!’ has become a lazy, knee-jerk form of dismissal, much like the charge of ‘communism!’ used to be. It constitutes a form of rubbishing, allowing – in the minds of those making the charge – for criticisms to be casually brushed aside. No doubt some things really are beyond the ability of science, and perhaps even reason, to decide. But there’s plenty that does lie within the remit of the scientific method, including many religious, supernatural, New Age, and other claims. However, because the mantra ‘But this is beyond the ability of science to decide’ has been repeated so often with respect to that sort of subject matter, it has become heavily woven into our cultural zeitgeist. People now just assume it’s true for all sorts of claims for which it is not, in fact, true. The phrase has become a convenient, immunising factoid that can be wheeled out whenever a scientific threat to belief rears its head. When believers are momentarily stung into doubt, there are those who lull them back to sleep by repeating the mantra over and over. The faithful murmur back: ‘Ah yes, we forgot – this is beyond the ability of science to decide…. zzzz.’

A kindred spirit! I’m looking forward to that book, and to Law’s chapter in particular. I’m hoping I can find some humanist who can engage me in a written debate about whether the humanities and arts are “ways of knowing” (I say “no”). I still have not found any fact or observation about the universe that can be sussed out by the humanities but not by science. (By “science,” I mean “science broadly construed”: the combination of reason, empirical testing, and replication described in Faith versus Fact.

Migrating birds take a pause in the Baltic

November 3, 2015 • 1:30 pm

by Matthew Cobb

Regular readers will know that the BBC has a series of natural history programmes based on UK wildlife through the seasons, generally named after the annual three-week spring series Springwatch.  Autumnwatch, the briefer autumnal version, began last night on BBC2 and had some gorgeous images (website here; non-UK viewers can watch clips too).

In the 30-minute on-line and more informal magazine programme that traditionally follows each episode (called ‘Unsprung’), they had a fascinating discussion about re-wilding with journalist and campaigner George Monbiot, showed some clips of lynx that greatly excited my young cat, Harry, and briefly flashed some stunning footage from Martin Grimm, a freelance field ornithologist and wildlife photographer based in Heidelberg.

Grimm was apparently on a research boat in the Baltic last week when, in the middle of night, flocks of migrating birds – mainly chaffinches and brambling, well known to UK residents from their gardens – descended on the boat, presumably attracted by the lights. Here are a couple of videos posted by Grimm on his YouTube channel:

The author Richard Hughes (1900-1976), whom you may know from his first book, A High Wind in Jamaica, and perhaps from the unfinished trilogy The Human Predicament, wrote a little-read book called In Hazard, based on the story of the S.S. Phemius which was caught in a hurricane in 1932.

In a key scene in the book (republished in the US in 2008), Hughes describes how the ship – called the Archimedes in his fictional version – eventually reaches the eye of the storm, where everything is calm. There,  all of a sudden, flocks and flocks of exhausted, bewildered birds descend on the boat, having been battered by the storm. They have a few hours of respite, before being hurled off by the wind as the boat begins its journey out the other side of the hurricane. I read that scene over 30 years ago and it still lives with me. The reality must have been something like that captured by Grimm, only infinitely more so.

Here are some photos of the scene on Grimm’s boat that were posted on Tw*tter, including a rather surprised-looking sparrowhawk who appears to have its lunch perched on its head: