Caturday felids trifecta: World’s greatest cat painting, cat fails, and a cat walks into a bar

November 7, 2015 • 9:00 am

Well, about a dozen readers sent me information about the sale of the world’s largest (and said to be “greatest”) painting of cats, auctioned off this week at well above the estimated price. It is, as Philomena would say, it’s “YOUJE”, was painted by Carl Kahler , and is called “My Wife’s Lovers”. The “lovers,” though, weren’t human: you can guess what they were.

I’ll let The Smithsonian give you the information, from a piece written by Erin Blakemore:

The painting, which Kahler completed in the early 1890s, stands roughly six feet wide and eight-and-a-half feet tall. It features 42 Turkish Angora cats as they pose and play inside a luxurious home, surrounded by precious art and antiques.

Who would commission such an incredible a piece of art? It was none other than Kate Birdsall Johnson, a San Francisco philanthropist and one of history’s greatest cat ladies. Johnson had more than 50 “lovers”—her husband’s ironic nickname for the pets—and lived in luxury at a so-called “cat ranch” in California. Her feline friends were well heeled, to say the least, and had their own full-time staff. Johnson was known to pay thousands of dollars for an individual cat and even bought pet birds to amuse her furry darlings.

When Johnson died, according to legend, she willed a large sum of money to her cats so they would continue to live in luxury. A Sotheby’s release claims that her will set aside $500,000 to guarantee the cats’ perpetual care, but the actual document contains no reference to cats or other animals. She was certainly generous, though: Johnson’s will established a free hospital with some of her riches.

Feline trust fund aside, one thing is clear: Johnson wasn’t the only cat lover allured by Kahler’s painting. A year after it attracted big attention at the Chicago World’s Fair, it was sold at public auction. After it barely survived the San Francisco earthquake of 1906, My Wife’s Lovers became a national sensation in the 1940s, gaining a reputation as “the world’s greatest painting of cats.” On November 3, an anonymous buyer spent nearly a million dollars to snag it. Johnson’s fluffy friends would probably approve of the purchase.

According to ArtNet, the estimated pre-auction price was $300,000, so it went for more than twice that. There’s an art-loving ailurophile out there willing to pay $19,666 per cat!
Here’s the painting; click on it go to the Sotheby’s site and see a video about it. Note that every Angora cat has a different expression. Reader Taskin, who sent me this, was particularly taken by the haughty expression of the tortoiseshell female (redundancy!) lying on the bureau at upper right, with one leg hanging down. As she said, “I’ve seen that expression many times.”
9417_lot_40.jpg__800x600_q85_crop
You can see other paintings by Kahler (some with cats) at this site.
 *******

Bored Panda is a reliable source of feline humor, and this week it features “20+ cats who immediately regretted their poor life choices.” (Readers have added over 80 other photos!). The reader who sent the link noted “I like 5, 14 and the look of desperation on 15”, so I’ll put those up first

#5:

funny-cat-fails-32__605
Source unknown.

#14 (also with a look of desperation):

funny-cat-fails-21__605
Source: imgur

#15:

funny-cat-fails-1__605
Source: imgur

Here are three favorites of mine, but all the others are good, so go see them.

funny-cat-fails-5__605
From imgur
funny-cat-fails-4__605
From darthnut

From Amber Dekker, apparently in the Netherlands, who labels this photo: “Sanne gooit gewoon de kat knock-out!” (Translation, please?)

funny-cat-fails-40__605

*******

Finally, here’s a great cat cartoon:

000f1b8c62daa75b0fcd8801a973f197

h/t: Taskin, Cindy, Blue, Grania and all the others.

 

Readers’ wildlife photographs

November 7, 2015 • 7:45 am

First, regular Stephen Barnard is back with a set of three pictures he calls “the usual suspects”:

A drake Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos):

RT9A0618

A Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis):

RT9A0725

And something a little different: I’ve been seeing a male American Kestrel (Falco sparverius) frequently. I sent photos. This is the first female I’ve seen.

RT9A0653

To show the sexual dimorphism in this species (one of my favorite raptors), here’s a photo of a male and female kestrel from FactZoo.comalong with a description from the Cornell bird site:

American Kestrels are pale when seen from below and warm, rusty brown spotted with black above, with a black band near the tip of the tail. Males have slate-blue wings; females’ wings are reddish brown. Both sexes have pairs of black vertical slashes on the sides of their pale faces—sometimes called a “mustache” and a “sideburn.”

american-kestrels-male-female

And reader “walkingmap” sent some photos from Colorado. First, a panorama:

I took this landscape on Sept. 27 the afternoon of the lunar eclipse, I had backpacked to  Lonesome Lake, Pitkin County, Colo. (Google Earth Address) to watch the eclipse. I was the only human there and it was glorious. For this picture I am looking north straddling the Continental Divide at about 12,000 ft. The Divide goes soft right to the close peak then swings back left along ridge to the middle of the picture.

The Continental Divide

When I turned around I found these lichens under an overhang. I think there may be 5 or 6 distinct colonies. I wish I had a macro lens for my iPhone. They were as wonderful to see as the landscape.
Lichens

One more from a different hike here in Colorado: Alloclavaria purpurea (Purple Coral) a beautiful mushroom that grows on the ground in Spruce/Fir forests at higher elevations, said to be edible but not distinctive.

Purple Coral

 

 

Saturday: Hili dialogue

November 7, 2015 • 5:17 am

It’s Saturday, and that means only one thing: today’s the day of the Annual South Side Pie Challenge, raising money for the Hyde Park and Kenwood Hunger Programs. I of course will be there to photograph the many luscious homemade pies (one of America’s great contributions to gastronomy), and also to contribute money to this worthy cause by buying as much pie as I can. Photos will be up within a few days. Also, I have several writing and science projects this week, so posting may be light. As always, I will do my best. Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is searching for her comestibles up in the trees, and where the hell did she learn Latin, anyway?:

Hili: Stupid birds, stupid birds…
A: Hili, what are you on about?
Hili: Audacter caluminiare, semper aliquid haeret.
Malgorzata adds this note about the Latin:  In case you do not know it: “Slander boldly, something always sticks.”
P1030568
In Polish:
Hili: Głupie ptaki, głupie ptaki…
Ja: Hili, co ty wygadujesz?
Hili: Audacter calumniare semper aliquid haeret.

 

The bizarre naked man orchid

November 6, 2015 • 3:15 pm

Let’s finish the week not with a cat, but a plant. This one, the “naked orchid” or “hanging naked man orchid,” is a real species, Orchis italica.

hanging-naked-man-orchid-1

There’s a reason they aren’t called the “naked hanging woman orchid”:

Orchis-italica-seeds-Pyramid-monkey-orchid-Italian-man-orchid-Home-Garden-Bonsai-Balcony-DIY-100-PCS

Don’t ask me the adaptive significance, if any, of this shape. Maybe there’s some insect that has a search image for men?

To see nine more bizarre flowers, many of them orchids, go here.

Go Canada

November 6, 2015 • 1:30 pm

Well, the new Trudeau government is off to a good start, and I’ll be brief:

  • Great news: according to Nature, Justin Trudeau just created a new cabinet-level post: Minister of Science:

“Kirsty Duncan, a medical geographer at the University of Toronto in Canada, will be the first to hold the job. Duncan, who contributed to the 2001 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, has also written a book about her expedition to Norway to determine the cause of the 1918 Spanish flu epidemic.

Her appointment marks a change from the government of former prime minister Stephen Harper. His administration placed oversight of science in the hands of a junior minister of state in the Industry Canada department.”

Clearly Trudeau is going to change the climate of secrecy around science, and the restrictions on government-employed scientists speaking, that the Harper government imposed.

“In their oaths of office, they each said: ‘I, (name), do solemnly and sincerely promise and swear/declare that I will truly and faithfully, and to the best of my skill and knowledge, execute the powers and trusts reposed in me as (cabinet title).’

Individuals had the choice of affirming their oaths, which allowed them to replace the word ‘swear’ with the word ‘declare’ and to omit the expression ‘So help me God.'”

  • Finally, Trudeau has created a cabinet with gender parity—half women—and also appointed two “aboriginal” (I’m not sure whether that means Inuit or non-Inuit First Nations people) members and three Sikhs. As the Guardian reports:

“It’s important to be here before you today to present to Canada a cabinet that looks like Canada,” Trudeau, 43, told reporters on Wednesday soon after he was officially sworn-in as the country’s 23rd prime minister – the second-youngest in its history.

Asked to explain his gender parity promise, he answered: “Because it’s 2015.”

Indeed.  As a Canadian reader wrote me, “It’s like a breath of fresh air up here.”

Here’s the new Cabinet:

cabinet_canada_pri_3492504b

But I can’t resist adding that another cabinet that looks like Canada is this one:

Leafs

 

Best of luck to Canada and its new liberal government.

h/t: Diana, Danish, and several other readers

A British student union defends ISIS again, no-platforms an ISIS critic

November 6, 2015 • 11:00 am

If you want to talk about the “regressive Left,” the poster child would be Britain’s university Student Unions, which have a shameful record of suppressing free speech, especially when that speech criticizes Islam. Their latest shenanigan, as reported in The Independent, The Spectator and The Tab, is banning a speech by someone who battled against ISIS:

A university and its students’ union have been accused of displaying ‘horrible prejudice against the Kurdish cause, human rights and the freedom of speech’ after an officer banned a former student from speaking about his experiences fighting Isis in the Middle East.

Head of the Kurdish Society at University College London (UCL), Kavar Kurda, issued a statement online saying he was ‘angered’ and ‘deeply offended and disgusted’ after University College London Union’s (UCLU) activities and events officer, Asad Khan, blocked Macer Gifford from speaking at an event which was being organised by Kurda.

Speaking with online student publication The Tab, Kurda claimed he was told ‘one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist’ and that Khan further defended his decision by saying there were concerns an event with a person speaking about their experiences fighting in Syria ‘could lead to others going and fighting in the conflict’.

The Tab reports more reasons given by Khan:

[Khan] said in an email: “In every conflict there are two sides, and at UCLU we want to avoid taking sides in conflicts.”

. . . Asad said the Syrian crisis is a “contentious topic” and defended his decision to block the speaker.

He told The Tab: “It is important to note the rooms these activities take place in belong to UCL rather than UCLU and we liaised with UCL, who in turn wanted to seek advice from the police.

“When they didn’t get a reply, to stay on the side of caution, UCL also leant towards not providing a platform.

“The Syrian crisis is a very contentious topic with many different groups, and although I understand YPG are fighting against ISIS the situation is far too complex to understand in black and white as expected by the student.”

Why is it “taking sides” to present someone who criticizes ISIS? Isn’t a good university one that presents several sides, and lets students decide for themselves? According to Khan, however, that’s not the way it works at University College London: these issues are simply “too complex” to be understood by students. Clearly, though, Khan understands them, and what he really understands is that ideas critical of extremist Islam are simply to be kept from students.

Khan is someone who’s clearly lost his moral compass. Seriously—equating ISIS with those who fight against them? And banning a speaker out of fear that it may inspire someone to go and fight ISIS? Let’s hope that UCL changes its mind, and that university unions across Britain stop trying to censor speakers so that students are presented with only a sanitized and approved set of views.

Screen Shot 2015-11-06 at 9.26.33 AM
Censor Asad Khan (photo from The Tab)

Radio show on Faith versus Fact

November 6, 2015 • 10:42 am

In about 20 minutes, at 9 a.m. Pacific time and 11 a.m. Chicago time, I’ll doing an hourlong interview with Stuart Campbell on his “Consider This” show at KZYX, public radio in Northern California. You can find a link  to the live feed here (click on “listen live” button to the right or tab at upper left), and it will also be archived on the station’s Jukebox site.

It is in fact archived now. Just click on the screenshot below and press “play” or “download” when you get there. My bit begins at 10:14.

Screen Shot 2015-11-06 at 1.29.19 PM

We’ll be talking about Faith versus Fact. 

Ben Carson’s shameful and willful scientific ignorance

November 6, 2015 • 10:00 am

Ben Carson, former neurosurgeon, Seventh-Day Adventist, and overall ignoramus about science, is now the front-runner for the Republican Presidential nomination. I’m hoping he wins that nomination because he’s a born loser, and Hillary (or whoever) would defeat him handily. But I doubt he’ll be the candidate, for although my opinion of Americans’ political acumen is pretty low, I simply can’t believe that we’d elect a man so retrograde, so right-wing, and so totally ignorant of science to run the country. It’s even more shameful because his career was based on science.

And yet he’s a Biblical, straight-up Genesis-six-day creationist. He’s downplaying it now, but if you have the time and will, listen to this speech he made in 2011 at a conference called “Celebrating Creation” (original talk here, my takedown here). That was before he knew he’d be a candidate, and so he pulls out all the stops espousing his crazy views—not just on creationism, but on cosmology.

As I wrote last week, Carson’s now downplaying his creationism, sensing that it somehow turns people off, but it’s now clear what he believes. The video below is annotated by VoysovReason to show where and why Carson is wrong. The subtitles are sometimes off (“Vestigial pelvis of Wales”? Is that a royal title?), and I don’t agree completely with every word of the narrator (humans are apes), but my disagreements with the science are trivial: by and large, it’s accurate, and shows Carson to be way off the rails:

Yep, there you hear every creationist trope, all of them long ago debunked: the great worldwide flood, a literal six-day creation, the canard of “circularity”—dating rocks with fossils and then the fossils with rocks—and so on. He even floats the Gish-ian idea that A. afarensis skeleton of “Lucy” (not just a skull, according to Carson’s lie, but a largely complete skeleton) was simply a modern human who had a “deformed head”! There’s no mention that we now have dozens of skulls and bones from A. afarensis, all of them are “deformed”!

Carson goes on: there’s an absence of transitional fossils (nope; read my book); an allusion to how complex organs like the eye couldn’t evolve because all the parts would have to be present simultaneously (“irreducible complexity”: the discredited basis of intelligent design); and even the idea that we couldn’t get order in the universe after the Big Bang because of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Nor can science explain altruism and empathy: those, implies Carson, must have come from God.

My favorite bit is at  18:30, when Carson mixes up Darwin’s finch collection on the Galápagos with Peter and Rosemary Grant’s work in the late 1970s on selection on beak shape in Geospiza fortis following a drought on the island of Daphne Major. Darwin didn’t see any drought-induced evolution in the Galápagos: he wasn’t there long enough!

There are many LOLs in this film, and most but not all are debunked. What a shameful display of willful ignorance!

But wait! There’s more! I wasn’t going to put this up, as it took place in 1998, but Carson has revived his 17-year-old claim that the Pyramids were built by the Biblical Joseph to store grain (Uncle Ben’s rice?), and that many scientists think that “alien beings” built the Pyramids. (What??) “Well,” I thought, “We have plenty of evidence of Carson’s ignorance now, so why go back so far to chastise him?” But he’s still maintaining that theory! The video below shows his original claim, and his defense of that claim just yesterday:

“Some people believe in the Bible like I do and don’t find that to be silly at all, and believe that God created the Earth and don’t find that to be silly at all,” Carson said. “The secular progressives try to ridicule it every time it comes up and they’re welcome to do that.”

As the Associated Press reports, the experts are taking Carson apart on his Pyramid hypothesis:

Neither Carson’s church nor any other major Jewish or Christian sect shares his belief about the pyramids’ origins. Jodi Magness, a specialist in biblical archaeology at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, said she knows of no scholar or archaeologist who questions that the pyramids were used as royal tombs.

“This is not an academic topic of debate,” Magness said in an email. “The use of the pyramids as tombs is verified by both written (literary) sources and archaeological evidence.”

The pyramids were built with narrow, secret passages intended to foil grave-robbers, making the structures unsuitable for grain storage, Magness said. And the design of the pyramids, with associated temples, “reflects the ancient Egyptian concept of the cosmos, according to which the king or pharaoh was at the center of a unified kingdom, serving as a god, a political ruler and a divine mediator.”

Even Carson’s own Church refuses to defend his lunacy:

Daniel Weber, a spokesman for the Seventh-day Adventist Church, said Carson’s belief about the pyramids are “his own interpretation.”

“Of course, we believe in the biblical account of Joseph and the famine,” Weber said. “But I’ve never heard the idea that pyramids were storehouses of grain.”

But does any of this matter? I doubt it. Anybody who defends Carson already knows of his creationism, and this Pyramid stuff won’t bother them a bit. For, as mushbrained as Carson is, his defenders are even more so, for they want the man to be President!

h/t: Randy Schenck, Hempenstein