I have landed (in Washington D.C.)

September 9, 2024 • 8:15 am

Well, it was a grueling 15¼-hour flight from Cape Town to Dulles Airport in the Virginia suburbs of Washington, D.C.,  and that was on top of a five-hour wait for my plane at Cape Town International Airport, resulting from an 8 p.m. departure when I had to check out of the hotel a bit after noon.

I tried to sleep on the plane, but it was largely futile. So, as usual, I watched a passel of movies, which included the first film (1972) of the movie trilogy “The Godfather” directed by Francis Ford Coppola.  After watching the whole three-hour movie carefully (and for about the fifth time), my opinion is only strengthened that this is one of the best American movies ever made (my top choice, which I’ve often mentioned is “The Last Picture Show,” released a year before “The Godfather”).

I know some people don’t or can’t rank movies, but if you’re daring enough to do so, I’d be delighted to hear readers’ choices for Best American Movie. (As for best foreign films, I’d choose two Japanese ones: Kurosawa’s “Ikiru” (1952) and Ozu’s “Tokyo Story” (1953).

BTW, I had forgotten that Marlon Brando, playing Don Corleone, is not the first character to speak in the movie; rather, it’s an undertaker asking the Godfather to exact justice on the undertaker’s daughter, beaten up by a gang of sexual predators. The first sign of the Godfather is the movement of his hand at 1:30. Here are the first 6.5 minutes:

The movie won the Oscar for Best Picture, and Brando nabbed it for Best Actor, but declined the award. It won a third Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay, shared by Coppola and author Mario Puzo.

I’m now cooling my heels at Dulles for two hours, waiting for the 2.5-hour flight to Chicago. After that it’ll be another 1.5-2 hours before I get home. It’s been a long, long flight, but less grueling than my canceled flight to South Africa, which I rebooked flying (after our flight to Cape Town to Dulles was canceled) from Dulles to Newark, then from Newark to Johannesburg, and then from Joburg to Cape Town.

I still have at least two photo-and-text posts left for South Africa, including a visit to the Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden in southern Cape Town, perhaps the best such garden I’ve ever seen. I hae photos of many flowers, including the resplendent King Protea (Protea cynaroides), the national flower of South Africa. Here’s a preview (these flowers can be as much as a foot across):

“Screams Before Silence”: Sheryl Sandberg’s gripping film on the sexual violence of October 7

April 27, 2024 • 11:30 am

By now there is ample evidence not only that sexual violence was part of Hamas’s attack on Israel on October 7, but also that this violence was part of the overall plen to brutalize and humiliate the Jews.  This much has been admitted even by the United Nations, whose UN Women group took way too long to even denounce that violence.

The UN’s official report, whose summary you can find here, concludes this, though results are still coming in:

Based on the information it gathered, the mission team found clear and convincing information that sexual violence, including rape, sexualized torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment has been committed against hostages and has reasonable grounds to believe that such violence may be ongoing against those still held in captivity. In line with a survivor/victim-centered approach, findings are conveyed in generic terms and details are not revealed.

In the context of the coordinated attack by Hamas and other armed groups against civilian and military targets throughout the Gaza periphery, the mission team found that there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred in multiple locations during the 7 October attacks, including rape and gang-rape in at least three locations, namely: the Nova music festival site and its surroundings, Road 232, and Kibbutz Re’im. In most of these incidents, victims first subjected to rape were then killed, and at least two incidents relate to the rape of women’s corpses.

The mission team also found a pattern of victims, mostly women, found fully or partially naked, bound, and shot across multiple locations. Although circumstantial, such a pattern may be indicative of some forms of sexual violence, including sexualized torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

. . .Overall, the mission team is of the view that the true prevalence of sexual violence during the 7 October attacks and their aftermath, may take months or years to emerge and may never be fully known.

Although the report has a bit of both-sideism by mentioning “allegations of conflict-related sexual violence” committed by “Israeli security forces and settlers,” none of that has been documented. Although those allegations persist, most, at least since October 7, have been retracted—even by Hamas.

Nevertheless, part of the attack on Israel is “rape denialism”: either denying that any sexual violence took place (“no proof,” some people say), or to admit that there may have been a small amount, but it was ancillary and not part of the strategy of Hamas (here’s one example of that denialism). The denialism is, of course, part of the denigration of Israel and Jews that has followed October 7.

If you have any doubts about the existence or extent of sexual violence, read the full UN report, remembering that the UN investigatory visit to Israel took place mostly during February of this year. But first, I’d highly recommend that you watch this hourlong movie, “Screams Before Silence”. Created by Sheryl Sandberg; it received its premiere just two days ago and has already been made public for free.  I’m putting the link here and urge you to watch it, even if you’re squeamish. It is immensely moving, disturbing, and yet heartening as the survivors struggle to tell their tale because they want people to know what happened. Most of all, it’s convincing.

As the Times of Israel reports about the movie,

The hour-long film, created in cooperation with Israel’s Kastina Productions, provides first-hand accounts from survivors, freed hostages, first responders, and legal, medical, and forensic experts. Sandberg is present throughout the film either interviewing individuals in a studio or accompanying them to October 7-related sites.

What emerges is not only an understanding of the mass scale and barbarism of Hamas’s sexual attacks against women but also their deliberate, pre-meditated, and systematic nature.

“When the body of the woman is violated, it symbolizes [the violation] of the body of the whole nation,” Prof. Ruth Halperin-Kaddari, former vice-president of the United Nations Commission on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, says in the documentary.

The film’s testimonies detail a horrific truth that was largely brushed aside by a report released earlier this week by United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, in which he declined to include Hamas among organizations suspected by the UN of committing acts of sexual violence during conflict. That report noted there is evidence that sex crimes were committed during the Palestinian terror group’s devastating October 7 attack on Israel, but did not specifically attribute responsibility to Hamas.

Guterres is, of course, an odious, Israel-hating git, and that’s nowhere better demonstrated than in his refusal even now to admit that Hamas committed sexual violence during its attack. (It also, as you’ll see in the movie, did so to some of the hostages.)  Since many of the victims are dead, and there is still a dearth of witnesses, much less bodies that can give evidence of rape or other sexual violence, there is certainly enough to buttress the UN’s report—and to show Guterres up as the liar he is.

But I digress. In this movie, which you can see by clicking below, Sandberg largely stands aside but listens as survivors, witnesses, and forensic experts tell the story. If this doesn’t move and anger you, well, I don’t know how that could happen to anyone with a heart.

Click below and then on the “watch full film” box. NOTE:  Some of the material is not for those who can’t bear to hear about the often horrible violence done to women. As I said, if you are squeamish about that, you might not want to watch.  I was horrified at some parts, but I also think that one can’t comprehend such a phenomenon without confronting it directly rather than through words like “sexual violence happened.” But your mileage may vary.

The Golden Steve Award Winners

April 21, 2024 • 11:15 am

A while back I posted about my cinemaphilic nephew Steven’s nominees for the “Golden Steves,” which he humbly presents as a better alternative to the Oscars. As he says,

Far and away the most coveted of motion picture accolades, Golden Steves are frequently described as the Oscars without the politics. Impervious to bribery, immune to ballyhoo, unswayed by sentiment, and riddled with integrity, this committee of one might be termed in all accuracy “fair-mindedness incarnate.” Over 200 of the year’s most acclaimed features were screened prior to the compilation of this ballot. First, some caveats:

1) Owing to a lifelong suspicion of prime numbers, each category comprises six nominees, not five.

2) A film can be nominated in only one of the following categories: Best Animated Feature, Best Non-Fiction Film, Best Foreign Language Film. Placement is determined by the Board of Governors. Said film remains eligible in all other fields.

3) This list is in no way connected with the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences—a fact that should be apparent from its acumen. Please look elsewhere for Oscar analysis.’

Click to read and see all the winners.

The nominees for the “big” categories are below, and I’ve put in bold the winners. Remember that there are eight categories below but 12 on the original list, so I’ll put the four extra winners at the bottom.

Best Picture

Afire
All of Us Strangers
Anatomy of a Fall
Killers of the Flower Moon
May December
Trenque Lauquen

Best Director

Laura Citarella, Trenque Lauquen
Andrew Haigh, All of Us Strangers
Todd Haynes, May December
Christian Petzold, Afire
Martin Scorsese, Killers of the Flower Moon
Justine Triet, Anatomy of a Fall

Best Actor

Paul Giamatti, The Holdovers
Benoit Magimel, Pacifiction
Cillian Murphy, Oppenheimer
Franz Rogowski, Passages
Andrew Scott, All of Us Strangers
Michael Thomas, Rimini

Best Actress

Jodie Comer, The End We Start From
Lily Gladstone, Killers of the Flower Moon
Sandra Huller, Anatomy of a Fall
Natalie Portman, May December
Emma Stone, Poor Things
Teyana Taylor, A Thousand and One

Best Supporting Actor

Jamie Bell, All of Us Strangers
Robert Downey Jr., Oppenheimer
Glenn Howerton, BlackBerry
Charles Melton, May December
Paul Mescal, All of Us Strangers
Mark Ruffalo, Poor Things

Best Supporting Actress

Penelope Cruz, Ferrari
Merve Dizdar, About Dry Grasses
Claire Foy, All of Us Strangers
Anne Hathaway, Eileen
Rachel McAdams, Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret.
Da’Vine Joy Randolph, The Holdovers

Best Non-Fiction Film

Apolonia, Apolonia (Lea Glob)
Beyond Utopia (Madeleine Gavin)
Menus-Plaisirs Les Troisgros (Frederick Wiseman)
Orlando, My Political Biography (Paul B. Preciado)
Our Body (Claire Simon)
To Kill a Tiger (Nisha Pahuja)

Best Foreign Language Film

About Dry Grasses (Nuri Bilge Ceylan)
Afire (Christian Petzold)
Anatomy of a Fall (Justine Triet)
Fallen Leaves (Aki Kaurismaki)
Trenque Lauquen (Laura Citarella)
The Zone of Interest (Jonathan Glazer)

And the other winners:

Best Screenplay–Adapted: All of Us Strangers (Andrew Haigh)

Best Screenplay–Original: Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World (Radu Jude)

Best Animated Feature:  Robot Dreams (Pablo Berger)

Best Original Song: Live That Way Forever,” The Iron Claw (Richard Reed Parry, Laurel Sprengelmeyer)

Here’s that best original song:

I guess I’ll have to see “May December” as it took home three Golden Steves. My moviegoing has been thin in the past year, and I know nothing about this movie save that it got a 91% Critics Rating (but only a 65% Viewers Rating) on Rotten Tomatoes. Here’s the trailer, showing the costars Julianne Moore and Natalie Portman.

 

California school tries to censor new documentary movie that shows some embarrassing stuff (attempts to remove A.P. classes, propagandizing of students, etc.)

April 8, 2024 • 12:00 pm

There’s a new 38-minute movie out, “Man of Steele”, made by filmmaker Eli Steele about diversity, the attempted removal of AP classes, and antisemitism in a ritzy California school district.  The movie, however, was was apparently removed from both YouTube and Vimeo—just for two seconds of video that someone claimed constituted “copyright infringement”. It appears to be fair usage, which isn’t really infringement, but fortunately you can still watch the movie. As Steele notes in the second headline below (click on each one to read):

The complainant was Menlo-Atherton High School’s newspaper, M-A Chronicle, and they objected to the inclusion of a two-second clip in the Killing America trailer. I checked the trailer’s YouTube page and, indeed, it had been removed.

Here’s are three Substack sites that explain the situation (the links to the movie are below, or you can click on the first headline).

I’ve watched the movie, and you won’t lose much more than half an hour if you do, but I have to say that it’s a bit of a dog’s breakfast, as it mixes together diverse subjects (removal of AP classes from a high school, equity, diversity, a school board’s musing over the advanced-placement classes, and the reaction of one parent whose son goes to the Bay Area school at issue).  Perhaps I was tired, but I didn’t find it particularly coherent. That said, it’s still worth watching to see the parents battle over whether “tracking” students creates inequities and is unfair, or whether it allows students to reach their full potential. It’s worth it to see the school board dissimulate, and it’s worth it to see the odious, antisemitic and pro-Palestinian lies that some teachers tell to their students. But the film fails explain clearly how equity is connected with anti-Semitism, although one can intuit that the connection is via a DEI mentality, which promotes equity and denigrates Jews at the same time (Jews are seen as white, oppressive colonialists). And the occasional insertion of Russian stuff, like their national anthem, baffles me. Is Steele saying that Marxism is behind some of this? Who knows?

In the end, one doesn’t know what happens in the school district, but perhaps because the school board hasn’t decided what to do.

Here, from one of the posts, is the creator’s explanation of why he wanted to get the movie out (I know him only by the name “Man of Steele”):

That is why I’m releasing the film now — to force the following issues to the forefront:

  • Free Speech — what are we teaching students at high school newspapers when we tell them to embrace censorship, not free speech, as their weapon of choice?
  • Artistic Expression — are we going to let documentaries and other art forms be censored by activists, especially those in wealthy, elite neighborhoods?
  • Hate/Antisemitism — Why has this school and district largely ignored the rising antisemitism on campus? We know if it was blacks who were on the receiving end, the response would be different. This double-standard must end.
  • Ideological Capture/Lowering of Education Standards — For too long these education activists, many from Stanford University and beyond, have been given free reign to impose their ideologies onto students. As a result, the quality of education has declined significantly.

People often ask why I made Killing America and Diana Blum, the film’s main subject, once said something that summed up my thoughts perfectly: “With this film, I wanted to give parents a voice because they’ve been silenced and ridiculed for so long by the school board, activist teachers, and the school authorities. This film is our way to get around that ideological resistance and be heard for once and for all.”

I don’t have to say it but the irony here is that it is these education ideologues that are trying to take our voice away once again.

To watch the movie, click on the headline below, go here (same place), or watch it on Steele’s tweet below.

Again, I emphasize that you should watch this movie, but realize that it’s not a fully-formed documentary. The fact that the school is trying to censor it on trivial grounds tells you all you need to know.

If you want to donate to Steele to support the movie, go here. I also found this on the donation page, which clarifies the film a bit.

THE STORY: In August of 2023, I was contacted by Bay Area parents who recently learned that Sequoia Union High School District had been removing honors classes for the past 8 years. Not only that, they were infusing other classes with liberated ethnic studies curricula. At first, I thought that this was an old story. We saw how Virginia and Manhattan parents fought over the schools for the past three years.

Then October 7 happened.

It quickly became apparent to us how the immediate and unapologetic rise in antisemitism in the Bay Area schools was related to the elimination of honors classes as well as the oppressor-oppressed model that ethnic studies brought into the classroom. We knew then that we had a film here and “Killing America” is the result.

h/t: Luana

 

Caturday felid triefecta: Newlyweds adopt cat who crashed their wedding; full body acupressure cat massage; and earliest videos of cats

April 6, 2024 • 11:00 am

From yahoo!life, apparently originating at Fox News, we hear of a stray cat that interrupted a wedding.  The outcome was inevitable; click on screenshot below to read:

An excerpt:

A stray kitten was adopted by an adoring couple after she interrupted their wedding last year.

Cat owner Cara racked up over 3 million likes after posting video of her meow-filled wedding ceremony on TikTok. The wedding was held at Curry Estate in Hopewell Junction, New York in September 2023.

Video shows the groom reading his vows to the bride when audience members suddenly hear a cat – now named Daisy – loudly meowing.

Cara told Fox News Digital that she originally didn’t hear the chatty cat.

Here’s what I think is that the Tik Tok video:

@gatsby.and.daisy

The cat distrubtion system was working overtime for this one! #cat #weddingtok #catdistributionsystem

♬ Here Comes the Sun – Relaxing Instrumental Music

Besides the wedding, there is of course another happy ending: the stray kitten got adopted:

Cara’s sister, who served as the maid of honor, then called the couple’s attention to the matter.

“[She] kindly let us know that there was a cat right there meowing,” the wife explained. “She was so perfectly perched on a tree stump behind us demanding to be heard.”

According to Cara, she and her husband were already “huge cat people” before the ceremony – and the feline’s unexpected appearance was a highlight.

“We have a cat that we adopted together, Gatsby, [and] our friends have celebrity nicknamed us Catt (Cara + Matt), and we even had cat cake toppers,” she explained.

“It felt like this was all meant to be when she showed up.”

After the bride and groom fell in love with the kitten, the couple’s families and friends worked hard to look for her – but had no luck.

“All anyone could talk about was the cat. It was the highlight of the night… I knew we had to have her.”

All’s well that ends well:

Two weeks later, Cara and Matt were contacted by their wedding venue. After trying for days, staff were finally able to lure the stray with leftover shrimp from past weddings.

“We were on our honeymoon [when they said] they had gotten her and that she was headed to a shelter if we wanted to adopt her,” Cara explained.

Cara said Daisy perfectly integrated into her household. She was named after Daisy Buchanan from “The Great Gatsby” to match with her sibling, Gatsby.

“She is the most affectionate cat and loves nothing more than spending the day curled up inside our sweaters,” Cara said. “It got even better when our resident cat, Gatsby, befriended her so quickly.”

And a wonderful three-minute news video of the whole affair. Be sure to watch the whole thing showing Daisy finally adopted by the ailurophilic newlyweds.  I love that the cats are named after characters from The Great Gatsby.

****************************

Ginger, who sent this video of a New Age full-body cat massage, said, “You don’t have to watch/listen to the whole thing, but that is one HAPPY cat!  Every cat should have such treatment a least a few times in their nine lives.”

The maker, itzblitzz, adds this note:

(Update: We adopted her). Hi everyone  In today’s video, I will be giving our current foster kitten a relaxing massage . This has been one of my most HIGHLY requested videos of all time! I hope you find it relaxing and enjoyable. We have fostered 4 cats so far this year and it has been a very rewarding experience.
Start the video at 2:30 when the ad ends and the massage begins. It’s pretty New-Agey, so you can just look in on this 41-minute video. However, there’s no doubt that this is one happy cat!

****************

Here are three cat films, each of which purports to be the first video ever of a cat. But only the third one seems to have precedence.

First, an old silent film from 1906, colorized, fixed up and, most important, showing a CAT. Reader Jon says the short film is “a good way to modernize history (and show cats haven’t changed much over the years).”  This isn’t the earliest cat video, though; the two below it were made earlier.

The YouTube information (I didn’t alter caps or anhything):

We have learned so far that this film is “Le déjeuner des Minet” made in 1905, and released in 1906. This is a french movie, and many viewer lipread french words.

What we don’t know yet : The name of the director. The name of the young girl, and her grandmother,

Old film restoration with the following workflow : – Cleaning dust and scratches, degraining, stabilizing, sharpening, auto-levels and auto-white balance with AVISynth – Upscaled and Colorized using neural network to 4k – Frame interpolation up to 60 fps

And one from 1899 by Louis Lumière. It also claims to be the first cat video, but apparently it’s not.

This early silent film is the first cat video to be made in 1899 featuring a young girl feeding a rather energetic cat. The film was directed by Louis Lumière.

In fact, the REAL earliest video of a cat is this one released in 1894 by Thomas Edison Studios of two boxing cats.  I don’t like it because of the pugnacious, fighting moggies.  But the YouTube notes say this:

This film is the product of Thomas Edison’s (yes, that Thomas Edison!) Manufacturing Company. Why did the brilliant men – namely producer, W.K.L. Dickson – who worked for Thomas Edison feel that they needed to use this new technology to show the world “boxing cats” is a question that has boggled the minds of film historians for over 100 years.

 

h/t: Ginger K., Jon

Nominees for the Golden Steve Awards

March 12, 2024 • 11:30 am

Each year my cinemaphilic nephew Steven gives his nominations for the best achievements in motion picture production, all vying for the coveted “Gold Steve” awards.  They appear on his website Truth at 24, and if you click below you can see the whole list of nominees. There’s not much overlap with the Oscar nominees. The title comes from one of the nominated movies below (“Fallen Leaves”):

Here’s Steven’s introduction to the nominees (the awards will come “sometime in April”), written with his characteristic modesty:

Presenting…the 2023 Golden Steve Awards.

Far and away the most coveted of motion picture accolades, Golden Steves are frequently described as the Oscars without the politics. Impervious to bribery, immune to ballyhoo, unswayed by sentiment, and riddled with integrity, this committee of one might be termed in all accuracy “fair-mindedness incarnate.” Over 200 of the year’s most acclaimed features were screened prior to the compilation of this ballot. First, some caveats:

1) Owing to a lifelong suspicion of prime numbers, each category comprises six nominees, not five.

2) A film can be nominated in only one of the following categories: Best Animated Feature, Best Non-Fiction Film, Best Foreign Language Film. Placement is determined by the Board of Governors. Said film remains eligible in all other fields.

3) This list is in no way connected with the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences—a fact that should be apparent from its acumen. Please look elsewhere for Oscar analysis.

I’ll present the nominees in the most followed categories, but be aware that there are more on the site. Also, Steven has excellent taste in movies, so it would behoove you to pay attention to the list.

Best Picture

Afire
All of Us Strangers
Anatomy of a Fall
Killers of the Flower Moon
May December
Trenque Lauquen

Best Director

Laura Citarella, Trenque Lauquen
Andrew Haigh, All of Us Strangers
Todd Haynes, May December
Christian Petzold, Afire
Martin Scorsese, Killers of the Flower Moon
Justine Triet, Anatomy of a Fall

Best Actor

Paul Giamatti, The Holdovers
Benoit Magimel, Pacifiction
Cillian Murphy, Oppenheimer
Franz Rogowski, Passages
Andrew Scott, All of Us Strangers
Michael Thomas, Rimini

Best Actress

Jodie Comer, The End We Start From
Lily Gladstone, Killers of the Flower Moon
Sandra Huller, Anatomy of a Fall
Natalie Portman, May December
Emma Stone, Poor Things
Teyana Taylor, A Thousand and One

Best Supporting Actor

Jamie Bell, All of Us Strangers
Robert Downey Jr., Oppenheimer
Glenn Howerton, BlackBerry
Charles Melton, May December
Paul Mescal, All of Us Strangers
Mark Ruffalo, Poor Things

Best Supporting Actress

Penelope Cruz, Ferrari
Merve Dizdar, About Dry Grasses
Claire Foy, All of Us Strangers
Anne Hathaway, Eileen
Rachel McAdams, Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret.
Da’Vine Joy Randolph, The Holdovers

Best Non-Fiction Film

Apolonia, Apolonia (Lea Glob)
Beyond Utopia (Madeleine Gavin)
Menus-Plaisirs Les Troisgros (Frederick Wiseman)
Orlando, My Political Biography (Paul B. Preciado)
Our Body (Claire Simon)
To Kill a Tiger (Nisha Pahuja)

Best Foreign Language Film

About Dry Grasses (Nuri Bilge Ceylan)
Afire (Christian Petzold)
Anatomy of a Fall (Justine Triet)
Fallen Leaves (Aki Kaurismaki)
Trenque Lauquen (Laura Citarella)
The Zone of Interest (Jonathan Glazer)

A brief take on the movie “Rustin”

March 9, 2024 • 12:00 pm

I’ve just finished watching the movie “Rustin“, which came out last year.  Civil rights leader Bayard Rustin (1912-1987) was most famous for organizing the March on Washington in 1963, the event at which Martin Luther King gave his famous “I Have a Dream” speech. Over 250,000 people showed up, and the force of their presence, and of MLK’s speech, was arguably the pivotal event leading to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And he influenced Martin Luther King’s approach to civil rights activism, particularly by emphasizing nonviolence. But despite Rustin’s influence, how many people remember him?

They will if they see this wonderful movie, which recounts not Rustin’s whole life, but the short period of a few months over which he organized the March. Played by Colman Domingo in a bravura performance, Rustin was marginalized by the movement largely because he was a former Communist and had been arrested and served time for homosexuality—”sex perversion,” as it was called in those days. His homosexuality figures largely in this movie, threatening at times to derail the March, but King, with whom he had a fraught relationship, defended Rustin publicly and got the event back on the rails.

Domingo’s performance has earned him an Oscar nomination this year for Best Actor (awards yet to come), and the film nabbed a critics’ rating of 84% on Rotten Tomatoes, with a viewers’ rating of 85%.  Although it starts a bit slowly, it quickly gains momentum and culminates with King’s famous speech given as Rustin stands by with smiles and tears. By that point I was in tears, too. At the end, Rustin, taught to see anybody who helped their people as a worthy person, appropriates a garbageman’s sack and starts cleaning up the grounds around the Lincoln Memorial

Wikipedia notes that “Rustin” was produced by Barack and Michelle Obama’s production company Higher Ground, and it’s a worthy effort. It’s definitely a film worth seeing, and also carries lessons today about how a combination of peaceful behavior, a righteous cause, and civil disobedience can move mountains. I remember those times, but they seem to have vanished.

Here’s the trailer for the movie:

If you watch the film, you’ll surely want to learn more about Rustin, and, fortunately, you can do that by reading  Coleman Hughes’s new article in The Free Press by clicking below:

An excerpt:

When I was an undergraduate at Columbia University during the turbulent years of the Trump administration, there was a racial controversy on campus almost weekly, with some students claiming they experienced white supremacy “every day.” Yet as a black student myself, I detected almost no racism at all. In my search to explain this gulf between rhetoric and reality, I looked back at texts from the civil rights era and found, in the essays and letters of Bayard Rustin—texts I had never encountered on any syllabus—a prescient analysis of everything going on around me.

Rustin, who was born in 1912 and died in 1987, was a key ally of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

. . . . Rustin himself was a discovery; a courageous activist, organizer, writer, and descendant of slaves who had been arrested and beaten for refusing to sit at the back of a Jim Crow bus in 1942, when he was 30 years old—a full 13 years before Rosa Parks made history by doing the same. A Quaker and conscientious objector, it was Rustin who introduced Martin Luther King to Gandhi’s theory of nonviolent resistance and persuaded King, his close friend and confidant, to found the Southern Christian Leadership Conference in 1957, though Rustin omitted the word Christian in his original plan.

Six years later, Rustin organized the landmark March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, where King gave his famous “I Have a Dream” speech. Rustin had put it together in a matter of months and created “the blueprint for the modern American mass political rally.”

How was it possible for a figure so central to the civil rights movement—who had not only envisioned but helped bring about a world in which black Americans demanded and achieved full citizenship—to wind up, in the words of his biographer John D’Emilio, “a man without a home in history”? By any objective measure, Rustin belongs in the pantheon of great Americans every schoolchild should know. And yet, as D’Emilio put it in his biography, Lost Prophet, “Rustin hardly appears at all in the voluminous literature produced about the 1960s.”

The short answer is that Rustin lived as an openly gay man at a time when every state in the U.S. outlawed homosexuality. His civil rights colleagues could imagine the end of legalized white supremacy but could not envision a world in which Rustin could live as a gay man without fear of arrest. The long answer has something to do with those prophetic essays.

You can read about his “prophetic essays” and ideas in the rest of the article—views that are especially salient during today’s “racial reckoning.” Read the article (Hughes is, of course, a “heterodox” black man) and see the movie.