Michael Shermer and Richard Dawkins: In defense of E. O. Wilson

If you’ve been following the fracas about biologist E. O. Wilson and the intimations that he was a racist or at least friendly with racists, you’ll know that there are at least three articles accusing him either explicitly or implicitly of racism (see here, here, and here).  Wilson’s also been defended by many of his … Continue reading Michael Shermer and Richard Dawkins: In defense of E. O. Wilson

More accusations that E. O. Wilson was a racist

There’s a new article in Science for the People magazine by Stacy Farina and Matthew Gibbons, which argues that E. O. Wilson was a racist. This is a different, more serious, and far better documented article than the Scientific American hit job by Monica McLemore, whose “research” apparently resulted from reading the last chapter of Sociobiology, … Continue reading More accusations that E. O. Wilson was a racist

Once again: Was E. O. Wilson a racist? His closest colleague says “no way”!

The accusations that biologist E. O. Wilson was a racist began with an unhinged article in Scientific American, which gave no evidence at all and, as a sign of its scholarly deficiencies, also accused Gregor Mendel of being a racist! Oh, and, based on semantics alone, it also claimed the statistical “normal distribution” was racist! … Continue reading Once again: Was E. O. Wilson a racist? His closest colleague says “no way”!

Daniel Finkelstein defends E. O. Wilson (and mocks Scientific American) in the Times of London

I don’t subscribe to the Times of London, so I count on my UK readers to alert me to anything interesting there. And today two of them did: Readers Pyers, who said the article below was “a superb piece”, and reader Adrian, who said this of the same piece (quoted with permission): Been following your … Continue reading Daniel Finkelstein defends E. O. Wilson (and mocks Scientific American) in the Times of London

Scott Aaronson hosts a guest post about the Sci Am hatchet job on E. O. Wilson

Several readers called my attention to the new entry on Scott Aaronson’s website, which deals with the recent Scientific American op-ed about E. O. Wilson’s supposed “racism”. (You can find the original piece here. Did you know that Mendel was a racist, too?) The op-ed was execrable, and I’d hoped that Laura Helmuth, the editor-in-chief, … Continue reading Scott Aaronson hosts a guest post about the Sci Am hatchet job on E. O. Wilson

Scientific American does an asinine hit job on E. O. Wilson, calling him a racist

Scientific American has hit rock bottom with this new op-ed that is nothing more than a hit piece on Ed Wilson, basically calling him a racist. It is written by someone who apparently has no training in evolutionary biology, though she says she “intimately familiarized [herself] with Wilson’s work and his dangerous ideas on what … Continue reading Scientific American does an asinine hit job on E. O. Wilson, calling him a racist

Our attempt to correct the record about E. O. Wilson: a joint letter to Scientific American—which, of course, they rejected.

UPDATE: David Sloan Wilson has also published the letter on his site “This View of Life”. ______________ A bunch of people in evolution and genetics took exception to an op-ed in Scientific American by Monica McLemore, which called E. O. Wilson a racist just days after he died. The author, who apparently had almost no … Continue reading Our attempt to correct the record about E. O. Wilson: a joint letter to Scientific American—which, of course, they rejected.