I published this quotation (and its larger context) over two years ago, but it bears repeating. It’s part of an essay by ex-liberal-Protestant pastor Mike Aus, “Conversion on Mount Improbable,” that was published on the old Richard Dawkins website. The part I’ve put in bold should be tattooed on the arm of every person who promotes “other ways of knowing.”
When I was working as a pastor I would often gloss over the clash between the scientific world view and the perspective of religion. I would say that the insights of science were no threat to faith because science and religion are “different ways of knowing” and are not in conflict because they are trying to answer different questions. Science focuses on “how” the world came to be, and religion addresses the question of “why” we are here. I was dead wrong. There are not different ways of knowing. There is knowing and not knowing, and those are the only two options in this world. Religion, even “enlightened” liberal religion, is generally not interested in the facts on the ground. Religion is really not about “knowing” anything; it is about speculation not based on reality.
Here’s a video of Mike Aus “coming out” as a nonbeliever for the very first time—on MSNBC, a national television station. He shows the slow attrition of faith described by other former pastors like Dan Barker and Jerry DeWitt. Note also that he gives credit to Pinker and Dawkins for his “deconversion.” So much for the claim that vociferous atheists are ineffective in bringing believers to science (and nonbelief).











