The new Charlie Hebdo cover: what does it mean?

January 13, 2015 • 7:51 am

Several readers sent me the new cover of Charlie Hebdo (CH), which I reproduce below. It shows a tearful Muhammad holding a sign that says (in translation) “I am Charlie”—the motto taken up by many after the murders—along with the header “Tout est pardoné”: “Everything is forgiven.” The new print run, instead of being the usual 60,000, will be 50 times that—3 million copies, and in 16 languages. I don’t suppose the murderers anticipated that their thuggery would revive and popularize a financially ailing publication.

Curiously, the cover drawing came from an article in the newspaper USA Today which, like many publications cowed by fear of Muslim wrath, notes this:

USA TODAY traditionally does not show images of Mohammed to avoid offending Muslim readers. But the magazine cover has enough news value to warrant its publication in this case.

Yeah, right. The Danish Jyllands-Posten cartoons or the Charlie Hebdo covers that prompted the murders didn’t have news value, but when a new CH cover comes out after the murders and actually shows the Prophet (violence be on him), that has news value? Give me a break.

Anyway, the cover can be interpreted in several ways. Matthew had one take and I had a different one. Perhaps the magazine meant it to be ambiguous.  So I’m curious how the readers interpret it.  Who, exactly, is being forgiven? Is Muhammad forgiving the magazine after the outcry? Or is the magazine forgiving the murderers? Or could the magazine even be forgiving those who were too quick to take up the “I am Charlie” slogan? Might it be all of these? Or are there other interpretations that make sense?

Cover

Before you weigh in below—and I really am curious how reader see this, especially in light of the misinterpretation of the earlier CH cartoons as racist, bigoted, and homophobic—have a look at what the cartoonist himself said about the cover:

This week’s front page was drawn by cartoonist Renald Luzier, known as Luz.

[The French newspaper] Liberation said the Charlie Hebdo team took up their pens on Friday, “with the objective of showing Charlie Hebdo was not dead”.

Shortly after the attacks Luz discussed the symbol Charlie Hebdo had become during an interview with Les Inrocks.

“The media made a mountain out of our cartoons when on a worldwide scale we are merely a damn teenage fanzine,” he said.

“This fanzine has become a national and international symbol, but it was people that were assassinated, not the freedom of speech … people who sat in an office and drew cartoons.”

Finally, to put this issue to rest, have a look at the Daily Kos article, “The Charlie Hebdo cartoons no one is showing you,” which makes perfectly clear the magazine’s pro-immigrant and anti-racist slant.

If there are two social lessons from this whole horrible incident, they are these. Many magazines and newspapers are still fearful of Muslim wrath, and won’t reprint cartoons even when they have immense news value. Second, many bloggers were quick on the trigger to accuse Charlie Hebdo of racism, bigotry, and even homophobia—all without making the slightest investigation of what the cartoons actually meant. It’s time for magazines to overcome their cowardice, and for those bloggers to examine their tendency to see racism and bigotry everywhere.

Reader’s wildlife photos

January 13, 2015 • 6:58 am

For a while we’ll alternate between wildlife photos and India photos. Today we have an unlikely pairing: an elephant and an arachnid.

Reader Richard sent an informative email about the elephants of Tsavo Park (Kenya) with some words on poaching. Note that there are two species of African elephant: the one below and the smaller forest elephantLoxodonta cyclotis. Richard’s captions are indented.

Last year, WEIT touched a couple of times on the poaching of elephants in Africa, especially that of Satao (WEIT 15/06/14 and 16/06/14). I thought that your readers might perhaps be interested in some photographs that show a more cheerful outlook. There are currently about 11,000 bush elephants (Loxodonta africana) in Tsavo East. On my first visit 28 years ago, I saw only one large herd. Heavy poaching was driving the numbers down, and over the next three visits I saw respectively none, one tiny group, and a solitary old male. Ten years ago, however, I saw well over a hundred in a few hours, and these are a few of the photographs. The really encouraging thing is the unusually high proportion of juveniles. It looked as though the recovery from the worst of the poaching years was largely endogenous. I plan to visit Kenya again soon, perhaps in a couple of months, perhaps next year, in which case I shall definitely try to re-visit Tsavo East to see if the picture is the same.

Tsavo_East_elephants_1

The second photograph is a bit of a joke against me. The time taken by an early digital camera to autofocus allowed the elephants to hide their heads. Lions perform the same trick. However, it clearly shows that Tsavo elephants are, indeed, pink. The soil is laterite, containing a high proportion of ferric compounds. When elephants find a muddy patch, they wallow in it, and walk away covered in mud, which stains their hides this characteristic colour. This leaves a slight depression, which collects more water, which attracts more elephants to wallow, and this positive feedback loop eventually forms a waterhole. I was told by a guide that most of the waterholes, which benefit many other species, are made by elephants.

Tsavo_East_elephants_2

Tsavo_East_elephants_3

Tsavo_East_elephants_4

The fifth to eighth photographs were taken from Voi Safari Lodge, which is built part way up a rocky hill overlooking the waterhole. Although a bit scruffy, it is my favourite safari lodge. The seventh photograph gives some idea of the emptiness of the place. The horizon on the top left is southern end of the Yatta Plateau, about 40 km away; there is no human habitation in view. The plateau is said to be the longest extant larva flow in the world, at 290 km.

Tsavo_East_elephants_5

Tsavo_East_elephants_6

Tsavo_East_elephants_7

Tsavo_East_elephants_8

The ninth photograph is a bit poignant. When I saw Satao [the big tusker who was poached for his tusks; see the two WEIT posts cited above], he had three companions, one behind him on the track ahead of us, and the two in the photograph joining the track from the side. When we came too close behind Satao, the left-hand elephant in the photograph threatened us, with outstretched ears and waving trunk. As soon as we backed off, he calmed down, and got onto the track behind Satao and ahead of us. He was the main reason that I could not take a better photograph of Satao. The only other time that I have seen a threatening elephant was when we inadvertently cut him off from the rest of his herd. Again, he relaxed as soon as we got out of the way. If you do not annoy them, these gentle animals are very tolerant of human presence, even if you are close to them.

Tsavo_East_elephants_9

The last photograph is not an aberration. The hyraxes are the closest living land relatives to elephants. This one is a yellow-spotted rock hyrax or bush hyraxHeterohyrax brucei, and is about the size of a domestic cat. They are very tame, and in fact are a bit of a nuisance around the lodge, frequently invading the dining room. They seem to regard the tiles and stone of the lodge as a natural extension of the rocky hill that is their normal habitat. They will readily take food from your hand, but this is not a good idea. Like elephants, they have a pair of enlarged incisors, which in their case function as pretty effective canines and can inflict an inadvertent but nasty bite. I saw a very unhappy small boy, who had just fed one, with blood pouring from his hand.

Tsavo_East_elephants_10

Switching gears, we have a scary-looking spider from reader Chris Taylor in Oz. I have no idea why nearly ever snake and spider in Australia is poisonous; have biologists come up with an explanation?

This is a male of the red-headed mouse spider species Missulena occatoria, which was running around on the drive of the my property near to Gulgong in New South Wales.  The male has the red head and fangs like this, while the female is all reddish-brown to black.  The male is most often seen, as the female lives in trapdoor burrows up to 50cm deep.  We often see the burrows, but not the spiders.  The male however goes wandering around trying to find a mate, so is more visible. And yes, they are capable of giving a serious bite to humans, though very rarely do.

Mouse Spider IMG_4151

Tuesday: Hili dialogue

January 13, 2015 • 4:24 am

I see that Hili has turned herself into a kind of feline Gandhi today. Sadly, she doesn’t have Gandhiji’s patience:

A: What are you doing?
Hili: I’m fasting for peace.
A: How long are you going to fast?
Hili: Another moment.
P1020197
In Polish:
Ja: Co robisz?
Hili: Poszczę na rzecz pokoju.
Ja: I długo będziesz pościć?
Hili: Jeszcze chwilę.

Haught comes to town!

January 12, 2015 • 4:14 pm

OMG, one of my colleagues just got the following invitation from the executive director of Chicago’s Lumen Christi Institute. I don’t know what that institute is, but it sounds Catholish*:

I am pleased to invite you to a lecture and dinner on Thursday, February 19 at the University of Chicago. The lecture, entitled “Theology and Evolutionary Naturalism: How Much Can Biology Explain?” will be given by John Haught (Georgetown University) and will take place in the Biological Sciences Learning Center Room 001 at 4:30pm. Immediately following the event, you are invited to dinner with Prof. Haught and faculty at Gavin House (1220 East 58th Street). You can find out more about the lecture HERE.
I hope you will be able to join us for the lecture and dinner on February 19. Please RSVP to [name redacted to prevent embarrassment to the parties involved]
Of course given my history with Haught (see the Great Debate here and the Q&A here), I wasn’t invited, but I TAUGHT IN THAT ROOM! How dare they despoil a temple of real learning with Haught’s obscurantism and nebulous musings about the “layers of reality”? This town doesn’t have room for the two of us.
Many scientists and philosophers claim that a Darwinian understanding of life has rendered the idea of God unnecessary. Descent, diversity, design, death, suffering, sex, intelligence, morality, and religion—features of life that had previously been understood theologically—now seem open to a purely natural explanation. This lecture will consider whether the claims of evolutionary naturalists are coherent and whether a theological understanding of life can still be reconciled with biological accounts.

Any guesses about whether Haught will show that theology and biology can be reconciled? I’ll bet anyone $100 versus $1 that he will!

Haught is also lecturing the day before at the University Club downtown on “Science, Faith, and the New Atheism“:

The bestselling books by the “New Atheists” Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett and Christopher Hitchens provide colorful portraits of the evils of religions, especially those that profess belief in a personal God. In their passionate denunciation of faith in God the New Atheists appeal not only to morality but also to reason to convince readers of the absolute wrongness of belief in God. This lecture will summarize the main claims of the New Atheists and examine whether these claims are themselves reasonable.

And what do you think the chances are that Haught will consider the claims of New Atheists to be reasonable?

I note from the Lumen Christi description that Haught got a “Friend of Darwin” award in 2008 from the National Center for Science Education. I don’t think that if Darwin were alive, he’d consider Haught a friend, and the NCSE should reserve those awards for people who espouse naturalistic evolution not (as does Haught) spooky God-directed evolution.

 ________________
*I looked it up the Lumen Christi Institute, and it turns out to be what I thought:

The Lumen Christi Institute advocates, supports and nurtures intellectual work done in intimate relation to the Light of Christ, the Catholic Christian tradition, and the teaching authority of the Church.

The Lumen Christi Institute exists to strengthen and nourish contemporary intellectual culture by deepening knowledge of the Catholic tradition, and to build up the Catholic presence in higher education by fostering the cultural formation of the university.

 

City council declares that an Alabama town now belongs to God

January 12, 2015 • 12:45 pm

I was going to post on free will today (several readers have sent me Daniel Dennett’s defense of free will recently published in Prospect), and I’m sure some of you are glad I’m not! Regardless, I will take up that cudgel tomorrow, but now I’m piled under with a complicated science paper to write and a book to review for a newspaper. So let me just put up some persiflage for the afternoon.

Reader Su sent me this juicy bit of news from Addicting Info. Of course it involves Alabama, which I’m starting to think of as a different country, not a different state. The hyper-religious of Alabama have amused and angered us many times with their shenanigans, but this one really takes the cake.

As reported by that site, and verified by Al.com, the last act in 2014 of the city council of Winfield, Alabama (population 4540) was to declare that the town was now OWNED BY GOD.  The council passed this resolution (from Al.com), and I kid you not:

Screen Shot 2015-01-12 at 12.27.56 PM

Sadly, where the City of Winfield is now “because of God’s grace and mercy” is impoverished: the median income of a family, as reported by Wikipedia, is about $38,000—12,000 or so less than the median income of all Americans—and 14% of the population is below the poverty line. Presumably that will change now that God owns the town.

Mayor Randy Price sees nothing wrong with the resoution, and asserts that the reaction of his town has been mostly positive. Of course. He said this:

I feel like we need to stand up for what is right. Our forefathers said ‘One nation under God’ and we went so far away from that. There are not enough godly people involved in day-to-day decisions.

And, perhaps concerned that perhaps Jews (if there are any in Winfield) or atheists (ditto) might feel disenfranchised, Price avowed that there really is only one religion, which of course is his:

“I’m going to step on a lot of people’s toes but there’s not but one God and, that one God, to Him be the glory,” Price said. “There’s no other way; there’s no other God. There are a lot of religions out there but only one God.”

Now that God is the mayor, I assume that all crime will cease immediately, as will fornication and consumption of the Demon Rum.

Here’s the city council, with Price in the middle, looking like a Christian Godfather.

16711327-large
Members of the Winfield, Ala., City Council unanimously approved a resolution in December 2014 declaring the city is “owned” by God and is a “City under God.” Council members are, from left, Grant Webb, Gloria Stovall, Max Brasher, Mayor Randy Price, Rusty Barnes and Steve Martin. (Contributed by City of Winfield)

Al.com also shows a monument to the Ten Commandments that Price has erected at his business—a “wrecker service.” (To you non-Americans, that’s a company that tows away damage or destroyed cars.)

h/t: Su

The Economist also publishes a map of the Middle East that omits Israel

January 12, 2015 • 11:11 am

Only nine days ago I wrote about how the publisher HarperCollins issued an atlas of the Middle East that included a map that didn’t show Israel. Just to refresh your memory, here was that map:

harpers-map

 HarperCollins’s explanation?

Collins Bartholomew, a subsidiary of HarperCollins that specializes in maps, told the Tablet that it would have been “unacceptable” to include Israel in atlases intended for the Middle East. They had deleted Israel to satisfy “local preferences.”

After a public outcry, HarperCollins took the book off sale and pulped the copies. But the damage had been done, and the publisher’s name sullied. Even critics of Israel, it seems, couldn’t countenance seeing a country simply effaced from existence.

Well, it’s happened again, and with a new map. According to CiF Watch, the British publication The Economist, a respected magazine, has published a story on the Middle East called “Soaring Ambition” (you can see the original here), that shows the map below:

Screen Shot 2015-01-12 at 6.12.46 AM

This is not the same map as the HarperCollins one, so it’s wasn’t simply copied from their atlas.  Why did they leave out Israel? I hate to think it’s because they’re catering to the feelings of the “locals” (that was HarperCollins’s explanation).

I left a comment (see below), and if you want you can do so, too: registration is free, so just go here and comment, which will automatically take you to an easy registration site.

Here’s what I said and a reply:

Screen Shot 2015-01-12 at 11.05.07 AM

h/t: Malgorzata