Amazing video: first human birth visualized by MRI

July 2, 2012 • 8:18 am

These videos of a human birth, the first visualized by magnetic resonance imaging, apparently appeared as supplementary material to a paper by Bamberg et al. referenced at bottom.

The scan was obviously terminated when the baby’s head emerged so that the machine wouldn’t interfere with removing the infant (see picture below).

Supine view:

The write-up from The Unnecesarean.com site:

In November 2010, a 24 year old gravida 2, para 2 woman at 37 5/7 weeks of gestation was admitted with regular contractions to the Department of Obstetrics of the Charité University Hospital in Berlin, Germany. The patient received an epidural and was transferred to the open MRI suite. In addition, the cervix was fully dilated, and the presenting part was engaged. Eight MRI studies were performed over a period of 45 minutes: 7 antepartum studies and 1 postpartum study. First, the woman was examined in the supine position with legs outstretched. In the active second stage, when the mother began expulsive efforts with the valsalva manoeuver, her legs were slightly abducted and supported by padding. This period was evaluated by real-time cinematic MRI series.

A 2585 gram appropriate-for-gestational age boy with Apgar scores of 9, 9, and 10 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes. Umbilical and umbilical vein pH measurements are routinely assessed as part of our daily practice. However, because of technical difficulties with the umbilical artery blood sample in this case, only the umbilical vein pH was available, which was 7.32. A neonatologist assessed the condition of the baby. Immediately after childbirth, the maternal anatomy was imaged before and after expulsion of the placenta, using a BFFE sequence. The total individual study time in the magnet room was less than 1 hour. The woman tolerated the discomfort during labor well and her postpartum course was uneventful. She was discharged with her newborn 2 days after delivery. The pediatric screening examinations, including auditory tests, did not reveal any abnormalities.

The setup for the scan:

h/t: Matthew Cobb via Emily Anthes

___________

Bamberg C, Rademacher G, Güttler F, et al. Human birth observed in real-time open magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:505.e1-6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.011

The most beautiful Facebook page

July 2, 2012 • 5:19 am

If you haven’t had a look at the Milky Way Scientists page, go over and see—and subscribe immediately.  It regularly posts some of the most fantastic landscape and astronomical photography I’ve ever seen. I’ll restrain myself and post a few specimens (click to enlarge).

Venus Transit. Photo was taken on June 6, 2012 using a Canon EOS 5D Mark III. Copy Credit : Alex Conu
Earth and Sun: The Setting of the Sun Over the Pacific Ocean and a Towering Thundercloud, July 21, 2003 As Seen From the International Space Station (Expedition 7); Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA-Johnson Space Center. “Astronaut Photography of Earth – Display Record.”
Mount Rinjani ~ Indonesia
Beautiful Morning Glory Cloud. The Morning Glory is a very rare meteorological phenomenon. It can be observed in Northern Australia’s Gulf of Carpentaria. A Morning Glory cloud is a roll cloud that can be up to 620 miles (1000 kilometers) long, 0.5 to 1.2 miles (1 to 2 kilometers) high, and can move at speeds up to 37 mph (60 km/h).— with Charrie Benedetti, Blair Ferguson, Pilar Rodríguez, Connie Coulter and Ornella Michelini.

I believe that’s a hang glider over the cloud. What a view!

Battle between light and dark.  Sunrise light creeps over the Palouse River canyon as the 200ft Palouse Falls rages with winter run-off. Photo by Ryan Dyar, used with permission.

And their “about” information is great:

Milky Way scientists is for humanists with an active interest in science. We believe that science is a fundamental part of humanism but also that it should be directed to humane and ethical ends. Science is, in our view, more a method than a body of facts.

Spain is Euro 2012 victor

July 2, 2012 • 4:28 am

This result was almost a foregone conclusion, but congratulations to my Spanish friends.

Although the New York Times may have exaggerated when calling the Spanish national team the “beat national team in the history of soccer,” (the Wall Street Journal agrees) it’s probably not far off. They were wonderful yesterday, with a superb exhibit of ball handling that crushed the Italian team, winning the European championship with the score of 4-0.  This video shows all the goals (the first, on a header, is stunning):

NYT:

On Sunday in Kiev, Ukraine, Spain defeated Italy, 4-0, to become the first nation to win back-to-back European championships. And let’s not forget that Spain won the 2010 World Cup in South Africa.

Comparisons? Brazil? West Germany? The great Hungarian teams of the 1950s? Spain is great and may have time to be even greater. Its players are young and in their prime, and there is no reason to doubt that Spain will contend in 2014 in Brazil and again in 2016, when France hosts the next Euro.

Interesting footnote: the United States is one of the few, if not the only, team to have beaten both Spain (2009 Confederations Cup) and Italy (friendly earlier this year) in recent years.

Spain has an incredible record of 42-3-4 in its last 49 games and made Coach Vincente del Bosque the first coach in soccer history to win the World Cup, European Champions League and European Championshisp.

It’s hard to know where the superlatives end.

I’ve been following soccer for only a few years, so I have no idea if this is the best national team ever.  Readers can weigh in here, though if one could form a single fantasy team with the best players of modern time, it would surely be Brazil.

Forty years ago today . . .

July 1, 2012 • 1:15 pm

. . . my oldest friends, Tim and Betsy, got married in Williamsburg, Virginia, home of our alma mater.  They sent me this picture of the wedding party today, which includes Professor Ceiling Cat in statu nascendi.  Can you spot him? (Hint: he’s wearing an ill-fitting blue suit borrowed from the groom’s father, with the trousers pinned up.)

Just remember: it was the early seventies.

Happy anniversary,T&B!

Later that summer, I was a member of a wedding party for another college friend, this time in Fort Worth, Texas.  They didn’t take kindly to longhairs there, and it was a very fancy wedding: the creme de la creme of Fort Worth society, including many oil magnates.

As it was hot, our job as males of the wedding party was to escort the ladies from their cars to the church, shielding them from the sun with umbrellas.  We lined up for our job, and when it came my turn, one monied old lady looked at me in horror and said, “Are you telling me that I have to be escorted to the church by Rasputin?”

Dawkins on Al Jazeera

July 1, 2012 • 8:52 am

Yesterday Richard Dawkins spent 35 minutes on the Al Jazeera television show “The Stream,” answering the hosts’ and viewers’ questions. The topic: “Is there room for religion in science?”

The questions facing Dawkins include the following: “Is atheism a religion?”, “Is there anything good about religion?”, “Isn’t it a base canard to say that religion is correlated with lack of education”, “Doesn’t living on science and facts alone make for a cold world?”, “Does morality come from God?”, and “Should atheists try to convert people to unbelief?”

I think you’ll agree that Richard is particularly eloquent in answering these questions. And for those who argue that Richard is strident (that includes you, Michael Ruse), look how cooly and respectfully he handles these hot issues.

Maryam Namazie and James Onen (from Freethought Kampala) make an appearance to add some support and intelligence. The skunk in this woodpile, though, is Haroon Moghul of the New America Foundation, who is antagonistically pro-faith and, at 18:30, blames extreme fundamentalist Islam and other fundamentalists faith on atheism: “state-enforced secularism”. That’s insane.

Further, one of the two hosts is repeatedly annoying in stressing that science has been wrong and of course will be wrong in the future; her implication is that we can’t have confidence in any science (this tactic, used in a subtler way, is beloved of Sophisticated Theologians™ ). Richard defuses it handily.  She doesn’t mention, of course, that religion has always been wrong.

I think this is worth watching in its entirety:

h/t: Abbie Smith

An inordinate fondness for Malaysian beetles

July 1, 2012 • 5:04 am

Lacking anything substantive to say, I am proffering pictures and videos today.  But they’re good ones. Here are some photographs of Malaysian beetles courtesy of Up Close with Nature, “Kurt aka OrionMystery’s Macro Photography” blog. Thanks to Alex Wild and Matthew Cobb for alerting me.

To a first order of approximation, all animals are insects, and all insects are beetles. Of the roughly one million described species of insects, anywhere between 30% and 40% are beetles, insects in the order Coleoptera.

Their abundance is the source of an anecdote that may be aprocryphal: someone once asked the geneticist J. B. S. Haldane what one could infer about the creator from the nature of His creation: “An inordinate fondness for beetles,” Haldane supposedly quipped.  A more reliable source, Haldane’s own book What is Life? The Layman’s View of Nature, says this:

The Creator would appear as endowed with a passion for stars, on the one hand, and for beetles on the other, for the simple reason that there are nearly 300,000 species of beetle known, and perhaps more, as compared with somewhat less than 9,000 species of birds and a little over 10,000 species of mammals. Beetles are actually more numerous than the species of any other insect order. That kind of thing is characteristic of nature.

Wikiquotes also reports Steve Gould’s attempts to track down the quote:

  • Stephen Jay Gould also discussed the quote in the article “A Special Fondness for Beetles” in the January 1993 issue of Natural History (Issue 1, Volume 2), which was reprinted on p. 377 of his book Dinosaur in a Haystack: Reflections in Natural History. Here he mentioned that Haldane had given a speech to the British Interplanetary Society in 1951, and that a report on the speech was included in Volume 10 of the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society which says that “he concluded that the Creator, if he exists, has a special preference for beetles.” Gould also says that in a letter to the August 1992 issue of The Linnean, a friend of Haldane’s named Kenneth Kermack said that both he and his wife Doris remembered Haldane using the phrase “an inordinate fondness for beetles”:

    I have checked my memory with Doris, who also knew Haldane well, and what he actually said was: “God has an inordinate fondness for beetles.” J.B.S.H. himself had an inordinate fondness for the statement: he repeated it frequently. More often than not it had the addition: “God has an inordinate fondness for stars and beetles.” . . . Haldane was making a theological point: God is most likely to take trouble over reproducing his own image, and his 400,000 attempts at the perfect beetle contrast with his slipshod creation of man. When we meet the Almighty face to face he will resemble a beetle (or a star) and not Dr. Carey [the Archbishop of Canterbury].”

But on to the creatures themselves; indented captions are from “Kurt’s” website:

Here are two photos of the “trilobite beetle,” something I didn’t know existed (they seem to be in the genus Duliticola, though this one wasn’t identified).

Amazing Violin Beetle from Maliau Basin

The name is quite appropriate, and this is one of five species in the genus Mormolyce:


Leaf beetle (Chrysomelidae, Hispinae subfamily) with two parasitoid wasps on it:

Handsome male click beetle, Callirhipidae, Elateridae

Look at those splendid antennae!

A rove beetle:

A newly emerged golden tortoise beetle(?) [JAC: probably not, because that species is found only in North America]

Rhinoceros beetle:

Finally, sex and death.

Mating pair of tortoise beetle, Laccoptera sp. (?). More bugs porn here.

Nature red in tarsus and mandible—a beetle about to meet its maker:

About two million species have been formally described, which means that up to 20% of all described species are beetles.  But that’s only a fraction of all species that exist on Earth, since most haven’t been found and scientifically described. How many species really exist on our planet? Go here for one answer.

There are lots of other pictures at Kurt’s site.  And Matthew has called my attention to an awesome artist who makes beetles and other insects out of glass: “Vetropod” who has an e-shop at Etsy. For around $60-$200 you could make some entomologist very happy at Christmas.  Here are two of Vetropod’s items: a rhinoceros beetle and a trilobite beetle. Go have a look.


Storm over Chicago

July 1, 2012 • 4:22 am

On Friday we had an evil-looking storm over the city, which, though threatening, didn’t do much to Hyde Park, the area where I live.  Reader “daveau”, however, sent several awesome photos of the bizarre cloud formations accompanying the rain; these were taken by his friends, who are credited below the photos. (Click to enlarge):

Photo by Andrea Grania

Photo by Kayla McCormick

Photo by Jean Marcellin

The Chicago Tribune has more pictures here.