Moar Kipling: The Cat that Walked by Himself, now with added biology

January 21, 2013 • 9:10 am

“Just So Science” on BBC Radio 4 has taken some of Rudyard Kipling’s Just So Stories and biologized them—interviewing experts on animal behavior to provide a gloss on Kipling’s descriptions. The latest BBC segment, which you can hear here, deconstructs “The Cat that Walked by Himself”. It’s a 15-minute program including a dramatic reading interspersed with intriguing facts about the biology of Felis catus.

The BBC site gives notes:

Vivienne Parry presents the science behind some of Rudyard Kipling’s Just So Stories, with wondrous tales of how things really came to be.

In Rudyard Kipling’s Just So Stories, we’re told how the leopard got his spots, the camel his hump, the whale his throat and so forth. But what does science make of these lyrical tales? For the most part, just-so stories are to be dismissed as the antithesis of scientific reasoning. They’re ad hoc fallacies, designed to explain-away a biological or behavioural trait, more akin to folklore than the laws of science. But on closer inspection, might Kipling’s fantasies contain a grain of truth? And might the “truth” as science understands it, be even more fantastic than fiction?

In Just So Science, Vivienne Parry meets researchers whose work on some of Kipling’s ‘best beloved’ creatures is helping us to answer a rather inconvenient question: how do traits evolve? Why are some animals the way they are? Excerpts from five of the Just So Stories are read by Samuel West 5. The Cat That Walked by Himself. Do we keep cats, or do they keep us? [JAC: Do we really need to ask that question?] The myths and the mysteries of felis catus [sic] explored by Patrick Bateson and John Bradshaw. Producer: Rami Tzabar.

I’ll put the original story below (it’s short and really cool), and you can go here to read about its background and the reactions of critics and other authors.

The Cat that Walked by Himself
by Rudyard Kipling

Originally all the tame animals were wild, but especially the Cat: he walked by himself and all places were alike to him. The Man was wild too until he met the Woman, who chose a Cave for them to live in, lit a fire in it and hung a horsehide over the opening. She cooked a meal of wild ingredients.

Then, while the Man slept, she took the bladebone of a shoulder of mutton and made a Singing Magic. This attracted the Dog, and on the next two nights she similarly lured the Horse and the Cow to visit the cave. They agreed to provide services to the couple, the Dog in exchange for roast meat and the other two for hay that she had dried by the fire. Each time the Cat followed and eavesdropped, called them fools, and went off to tell no one.

On the fourth night the Cat went to the cave and smelt the warm milk from the Cow. The Woman laughed at him and told him to go back to the woods. The Cat flattered her and asked if he might never come in the Cave, sit by the fire or taste the milk. She answered that if she praised him once, twice and three times, his three wishes would be granted, but swore she never would. The Cat left, but the Bat reported to him what was happening.

When he heard the Woman had a Baby, the Cat knew his time had come. He went and found that the Baby crying outside the Cave. He rubbed himself against it till it laughed. The Bat told the Woman, who blessed whatever creature was responsible, whereupon the horsehide fell down and the Cat was admitted to the Cave. The Woman was annoyed. She began to spin, but the Baby cried again, and the Cat told her to tie her spinning-whorl to a thread to pull about the floor for him to chase. This made the Baby laugh, then it clutched the Cat, who purred it to sleep. The Woman thanked him, then the fire smoked and the Cat was found warming himself. She was furious, and made a Still Magic to prevent herself from granting the third wish. In the quiet, a mouse came out and she screamed. When the Cat killed the mouse, she thanked him, and the Milk-pot cracked open, allowing him to drink.

But he had made no bargain with the Man or the Dog. The man said the Cat must always catch mice or have boots and other objects thrown at him. The Cat agreed, but defiantly, so was told that three things would still be thrown. The Dog threatened to bite the Cat if he were ever unkind to the Baby, and receiving a defiant consent, promised always to chase him up a tree. Man and Dog carried out their threats; most men and all dogs will do the same, though the Cat keeps his bargain. But on moonlit nights he roams the woods or the roofs, walking by his wild lone.

Picture 1

I can’t resist an old joke:

Man: Madam, do you like Kipling?
Woman: Sir, I can’t say: I’ve never kippled.

h/t: Dom

The Speech

January 21, 2013 • 6:03 am

Take 17 minutes to watch this in honor of the thousands of blacks who suffered and died to get to where we are now, and the brave men and women whose blood and toil finally dismantled official segregation in the U.S.

Martin Luther King’s famous speech on civil rights took place on August 28, 1963 in Washington D.C.  He spoke from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. He had given snippets of the speech before, but that doesn’t detract from its power, enhanced by the cadences of Southern preaching. I was in junior high school then, living only a few miles from where this speech was given, and I well remember how it galvanized the country.

I defy you to watch the last five minutes—the crescendo—without a tear in your eye, or at least a lump in your throat. (Note: a reader below says that my embedded video isn’t viewable in the UK. If you can’t see it, this one should work.)

Wikipedia notes:

Widely hailed as a masterpiece of rhetoric, King’s speech invokes the Declaration of Independence, the Emancipation Proclamation, and the United States Constitution. Early in his speech, King alludes to Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address by saying “Five score years ago…” King says in reference to the abolition of slavery articulated in the Emancipation Proclamation, “It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity.” Anaphora, the repetition of a phrase at the beginning of sentences, is a rhetorical tool employed throughout the speech. An example of anaphora is found early as King urges his audience to seize the moment: “Now is the time…” is repeated four times in the sixth paragraph. The most widely cited example of anaphora is found in the often quoted phrase “I have a dream…” which is repeated eight times as King paints a picture of an integrated and unified America for his audience. Other occasions when King used anaphora include “One hundred years later,” “We can never be satisfied,” “With this faith,” “Let freedom ring,” and “free at last.”

Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated on April 4, 1968.

It’s a holiday!

January 21, 2013 • 5:54 am

All federal agencies and public schools (and the University of Chicago) are closed today, for it’s Inauguration Day as well as Martin Luther King Day.  Actually, Obama was sworn in yesterday, for the law requires that to occur on Jan. 20, and today’s “swearing in” will be a sham.  And Martin Luther King’s birthday was really on January 15, but the third Monday in January is stipulated to be the holiday in his honor (once opposed by many Southern states).

The inauguration will be live-streamed, and, among other places, you can see it here (note that the faux swearing-in is at 11:55 Eastern U.S. Time):

ABC News and Yahoo! News have come together to jointly produce live stream coverage of the 2013 Presidential Inauguration of Barack Obama across ABCNews.com, Yahoo! News, GoodMorningAmerica.com, ABC News’ iPad & iPhone apps, ABC News affiliate websites, as well as on the ABC News YouTube channel.

Livestream coverage on ABC also starts at 9:30 a.m. EST here.

ABC News-Yahoo! News live-streamed coverage of the second inauguration of Barack Obama kicks off on Sunday, January 20, with a special report on the president’s official oath of office at 11:55 a.m. ET, followed by continuous coverage on Monday, January 21, from 9:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. ET, anchored by ABC News’ Dan Harris along with Yahoo! News’ Olivier Knox.

Four more years!  Now let’s see if the stupid Republicans can set aside their invidious ideology so we can get something done before 2017.  We can start with guns.

In honor of MLK Day and the Inauguration, I will strive to put up only cats or humorous items today, with perhaps one serious post.  Here’s the first: the world’s most awesome snowman (snowrabbit?) tweeted by Ed Yong and forwarded by Matthew Cobb:

BA9SwHBCQAArhkc-1

Cats on your counter? Try this

January 20, 2013 • 5:47 pm

Seems to work . . .

Click this link to see video: LiveLeak:

Daniel Babineau

Lately one of our cats has been causing mischief. We’ve been trying to find out which one it was. One of our cats, Jack (who is one of two possible suspects), jumped up on the counter only to be positively spooked by the tinfoil that was laid down to deter the cats.

Screenshot:

Screen shot 2013-01-20 at 6.46.17 PM

h/t: Gattina

R.I.P. Stan Musial

January 20, 2013 • 5:02 pm

I can’t believe it: the man seemed immortal. The Donora Greyhound died yesterday at age 92, and there’s no doubt that he was my favorite baseball player of all time. I suppose part of it is that he played for the St. Louis Cardinals, my favorite team (I was born in St. Louis), but he was also a fantastic player and an uncharacteristically modest one.

I saw him play only once—at Forbes Field in Pittsburgh when he was in the waning years of his career. But my dad, a baseball fan who was stationed in St. Louis as an Army officer, saw Musial play frequently, and was also a great admirer. He told me that he never saw Musial question an umpire’s call, and that Musial was so fast that he regularly scored from first base on a subsequent hitter’s single.

Musial is still, as far as I know, the only player to have ever hit five home runs in one day (a doubleheader).

Retired, he opened a steakhouse and, despite having been one of the greatest players of all time, eschewed interviews and publicity. Only Sandy Koufax was more elusive.

From ABC News:

“I never heard anybody say a bad word about him — ever,” Willie Mays said in a statement released by the Hall of Fame. . .

“Stan will be remembered in baseball annals as one of the pillars of our game,” Hall of Fame President Jeff Idelson said. “The mold broke with Stan. There will never be another like him.”

And how often do modern players do this?

At the suggestion of a pal, actor John Wayne, Musial carried around autographed cards of himself to give away. He enjoyed doing magic tricks for kids and was fond of pulling out a harmonica to entertain crowds with a favorite, “The Wabash Cannonball.”

His records (lifetime batting average .331, fielding percentage: .984):

In all, Musial held 55 records when he retired in 1963. Fittingly, the accolades on his bronze Hall plaque start off with this fact, rather than flowery prose: “Holds many National League records …”

He played nearly until his 43rd birthday, adding to his totals. He got a hit with his final swing, sending an RBI single past Cincinnati’s rookie second baseman — that was Pete Rose, who would break Musial’s league hit record of 3,630 some 18 years later.

Of those hits, Musial got exactly 1,815 at home and exactly 1,815 on the road. He also finished with 1,951 RBIs and scored 1,949 runs.

I could go on and on. When I was in Little League, I tried to imitate his stance at the plate, which was unique. He stood with his feet close together, instead of spread wide, and wiggled his rump as the ball approached.  Then he’d uncoil—and CRACK!  That  stance never kept him from getting hits, but perhaps it wasn’t the best idea for me!

I know a sports reporter or two, and tried, in the last ten years, to interest them in getting an interview with Musial (who probably would have refused).  They weren’t interested, probably because he was largely forgotten, but also quiet and not a publicity hound. But those were the qualities that made him special.

Stan the Man, as I remember him.
Stan the Man, as I remember him.

And that stance!

musial_stan_legends2_b

Pascal’s Wager comes around again

January 20, 2013 • 12:41 pm

There’s a new “Note to atheists” by Sidney Callahan in the National Catholic Review online. Callahan is not as critical of atheists as even some other atheists are (viz., Julian Baggini or Alain de Botton), but at the end she brings up a modernized version of Pasal’s wager:

When atheists realize they are accepted and understood they can take on some heavy lifting for the culture. They can work on ways to help people without faith to progress to moral understanding through reasoning and accrued human wisdom. Our society needs to be convinced of the value of the common good. Tasks of building caring communities outside of churches also await. Many people are so alienated from religious institutions that faith based moral appeals are no longer viable.

Well, the assumption here is that people with faith already have good ways to progress to moral understanding. But leave that aside:

And surely atheists can do better than to offer the solace(?) that death signals nothingness. Why not at least turn to the unsolved scientific mysteries of human consciousness or potential mult-verses? Appeals to the creative wonder of art, music and poetry would be helpful. When Dosteovsky said that the world would be saved by beauty, perhaps he foresaw future debates over reductive materialism..

I’m not optimistic to think that cosmology or consciousness will replace heaven, and I think that Callahan knows that. What will replace heaven is a better life on earth, and that means not Rembrandt or Donne, but universal medical care, more income equality, and less crime.  But leave that aside:

When I debate at home with my beloved Catholic atheists, I finally end with the remark that the only outcome for our argument is that they will be surprised on dying. If they are right and nothingness prevails, then none of us will exist to continue the conversation. Thank God I can’t believe that for more than a minute.

Now that’s wishful thinking: Callahan simply can’t entertain the possibility that her consciousness will be extinguished at death.

I must confess, though, that I too chafe at the thought that the religious people will never learn they’re wrong. And I sometimes wish that the faithful could be resurrected for a few brief minutes after death—just so I could tell them, “I told you so!”

h/t: Chris

Turkey suppresses evolution books

January 20, 2013 • 8:47 am

UPDATE: In the comments below, reader mecwordpress calls attention to an article in the Hurriyet Daily News in which TÜBITAK denies having censored evolution books:

The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) has strongly denied reports that it has stopped printing books on evolution, saying the claims were “black propaganda” against their institution.

“If we aim to censor Evolution Theory we would discontinue publishing any books containing evolutionist approaches, but on the contrary we are publishing the books that are not being published by other publishing houses,” an official from TÜBİTAK told the Hürriyet Daily News yesterday in a phone interview.

However, the official refuted the claims. “There are two books already in our 2012 catalogue regarding evolution, Richard Dawkins’ ‘The Blind Watchmaker’ is one of them … Dawkins’ ‘The Selfish Gene’ is not being published because of a publication rights issue, but this is being manipulated,” the official said.

He claimed that “some circles” had kicked off a “black propaganda” campaign against TÜBİTAK to “shadow its success,” following the successful mission of Turkey’s first Earth observation satellite, Göktürk-2.

Göktürk-2 was launched Dec. 18 in China, but Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan followed the launch at Ankara’s Middle East Technical University (ODTÜ) campus, which witnessed huge numbers of students protesting the prime minister’s visit.

Erdoğan had called on the academics who supported the students to resign, but the police’s heavy-handed intervention in the protests also stirred a debate among Turkish universities, with some backing the police and Erdoğan and some opposing.

Middle East Technical University, a secular and liberal school, was where I gave my talk.  Let us hope that this “black propaganda” was really wrong, and that evolution survives (albeit tenuously) in Turkey. Stay tuned.

_________________________

From LiveLeak and the Turkish Hurriyet Daily News, we learn that the Turkish government has suspended both the publication and sale of any book that promotes the theory of evolution. LiveLeak:

The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) has put a stop to the publication and sale of all books in its archives that support the theory of evolution, daily Radikal has reported.

The evolutionist books, previously available through TÜBİTAK’s Popular Science Publications’ List, will no longer be provided by the council.

The books have long been listed as “out of stock” on TÜBİTAK’s website, but their further publication are now slated to be stopped permanently.

Books by Richard Dawkins, Alan Moorehead, Stephen Jay Gould, Richard Levontin and James Watson are all included in the list of books that will no longer be available to the Turkish readers.

WEIT hasn’t yet been translated into Turkish (I’m trying!), but of course any English editions would be banned as well.  TÜBITAK is probably gunshy because of the fulminating creationism of Turkey:

In early 2009, a huge uproar occurred when the cover story of a publication by TÜBİTAK was pulled reportedly because it focused on Darwin’s theory of evolution.

The incident led to intense criticism and resulted in finger-pointing by various officials of that publication and its parent institute.

Most of us know that there’s a strong antievolution movement centered in Turkey, headed by the odious Adnan Oktar, who goes by the pseudonym Harun Yahya. Many of us academics received free copies of Yahya’s hilarious but expensive Atlas of Creation (see below), which was printed at tremendous expense and distributed to thousands of American scientists.  Oktar is opposed by the numerous serious Turkish academics who teach evolution and are facing intimidation or even banning.

When I lectured on the evidence for evolution in Ankara several years ago, I drew the largest crowd I’d ever had (more than 1200 people), and got tumultuous applause. That was not because of me, but because I was presenting something that intelligent Turks accept but that is largely unacceptable in their country.  I had death threats before my lecture, and that was the only time in my life I ever feared that I’d get shot.  But we can’t let the creationist thugs cow us.

At any rate, perhaps a Turkish reader can fill us in on the controversy as it unfolds. Turkey is one of the few Islamic-majority countries with an official policy of secularism, put in place by the admirable Kemal Atatürk (and enforced, unfortunately, by military power). Headscarves are forbidden in public universities, and evolution was (until now) taught freely. This banning of evolution books is a bad sign for the future of Turkey, and I wonder if the EU—which Turkey has been trying to join since 1987—can do something about it.

A side note: The main theme of Yahya’s Atlas of Creation was that evolution could not have occurred because living creatures are supposedly nearly identical to fossil ones (that’s why there are so many glossy pictures in the book).  One fisherman discovered, however, that several of the “living insects” appearing in the book were actually fishing flies that he tied.  Graham Owen published Yahya’s deceptive pictures (used without permission) on his web page; here are two from the Atlas showing fishing lures. Notice the hooks!

atlas-of-creation

And a mayfly (Owen’s flies are fantastic; apparently those creationists overlooked the hooks!):

AoC-mayfly

Owen demanded that those photos be removed, and they were in subsequent editions of this execrable book.

What’s sadder are a few comments appearing beneath the Hurriyet article:

Picture 1