God and the Superbowl

February 2, 2013 • 9:41 am

Atlanta, Feb. 2 (Groundhog Day).

The call of “God bless America,” which we in this benighted county hear so often, should really be “God help America!” But He can’t, because He’s too busy watching the Superbowl. (For you non-Americans, that’s the game that decides who’s the champion football team—as in American football—among all teams in both professional leagues.) The Superbowl is tomorrow (Sunday), and I had to put off my talk in Augusta by one day because nearly all Americans, especially in the South, will watch the game. For your information, the teams playing are the Baltimore Ravens and the San Francisco 49ers.

But I am embarrassed, even in hyperreligous America, to report that many Americans think that God is not only watching the Superbowl, but has an intense interest in the outcome. And Christians are in a dilemma because they don’t know which team God is favoring. As the Washington Post‘s “On Faith” section notes (my emphasis):

Who should Christians root for in Sunday’s Super Bowl: the San Francisco 49ers or the Baltimore Ravens?

It may be a silly question to some, though not to millions of American believers who invest a lot of faith and hope in their sports teams, and see it repaid many times over by the regular public testimonies of numerous athletes and coaches.

A survey released days before the big game shows that more than a quarter of Americans — and about four in 10 evangelicals — think God will help decide the winner of the Super Bowl. So certainly God is rooting for one side or the other, no?

This year’s NFL championship game, however, is especially challenging for those who like their Christian faith to align with their sports loyalties.

Ah, but those clever Christians have a way of deciding who to root for: they simply find out which team has more Christians. But that presents an additional problem because, as we know, some Christians aren’t very moral:

. . . the heart of this moral conundrum is that both the Ravens and Niners have more than their share of Bible-quoting believers — as well as card-carrying cads. And to make matters worse, the saint and sinner can be the same person.

Take Ray Lewis, Baltimore’s defensive standout and future Hall of Famer.

Not only is Lewis a great player, but he is so outspoken about his Christian faith that Sports Illustrated dubbed him “God’s Linebacker” in a 2006 cover story. Moreover, Lewis is retiring after a 17-year career and a season in which he made an improbable (miraculous?) return from a triceps tear that should have ended his year. Redemption, anyone?

On the other hand, Lewis is a fierce and intimidating character who was implicated in a double homicide 13 years ago outside an Atlanta nightclub, an incident that led to a plea deal on a reduced charge. To the anguish of some victims’ relatives, he still has not spoken in detail about what happened that night.

The article lists other “Christian” plays whose track record is questionable. The Post, though, manages to dig up one kineseologist who sounds sensible:

So what is a Christian football fan to do this Sunday? Maybe get some distance, suggests Shirl James Hoffman, author of the 2010 book, “Good Game: Christianity and the Culture of Sports,” and a pointed critic of the ethics of the modern game.

“I will watch the Super Bowl, but not under the illusion that the game is in any sense blessed by God or that it is going to bolster my Christian faith,” said Hoffman, a professor emeritus of kinesiology at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. “In fact, I will be very conscious of the fact that it is appealing to instincts that are anything but Christian.”

I’m wondering, though, how Hoffman knows exactly what is blessed by God. At any rate, he’s at odds with a quarter of Americans and 40% of evangelical Christians.

But wait—it’s worse than you think. Here’s a figure from the Public Religion Research Institute:

The key is at the top:

Length of purple bars: percentage of Americans in a category who think that “God rewards athletes who have faith with good health and success.”

Length of burgundy bars: Percentage of Americans who think “God plays a role in determining which team wins a sporting event.”

GotW-God-in-the-Superbowl-1-28-13-Final

It still amazes me, as atheistic as I am, that so many believers think that God takes an interest in who wins the Superbowl.  But he’s clearly more interested in that than in the starving children of the world, because at least the Superbowl has a winner.

h/t: Bruce Grant

Krauss on the difference between science and faith

February 2, 2013 • 6:43 am

This short clip was excerpted by reader Brian from a longer debate in Australia between physicist Lawrence Krauss and Uthman Badar, the media representative of Hizb ut-Tahrir, a Muslim organization. It’s a very concise presentation of the difference between science and theology, and of why theology doesn’t find “truth.” I have long used the quote by Feynman, which is one of my favorites.

You can find the full two-hour debate here.

The YouTube notes:

Discussion forum held at the ANU, Canberra on 9 April 2012 entitled “Belief in God: Prohibitive or Liberating?” Dr. Lawrence Krauss and Uthman Badar discuss the following and related questions.

Is belief in God rational or irrational? What role should religion play in our private and public lives? Is science sufficient to make religion redundant? Is the way forward for humanity in the 21st century a return to God or the completion of secularisation process of modernity?

Caturday felid: New weapons in the battle of cat vs. mouse, and bonus business cat

February 2, 2013 • 5:50 am

Jeff de Boer, an artist whose website is here, has an unusual form of art. He describes himself as:

a Calgary-based multi-media artist with an international reputation for producing some of the world’s most original and well-crafted works of art. With an emphasis on metal, he is best known for such bodies of work as suits of armour for cats and mice, armour ties and sword-handled briefcases, rocket lamps and pop culture ray guns, and exquisite high art, abstract works called exoforms.

The page with the cat and mouse armor is here; go have a look at these amazing constructions. I’ll show some of the cat armor and, to be fair to teh rodents, one set of mouse armor.

Tournament Cat, 20082008, nickel, aluminum, leather, brass, wood
Tournament Cat, 2008
2008, nickel, aluminum, leather, brass, wood
Samurai Siamese2005, copper, brass, mixed media
Samurai Siamese
2005, copper, brass, mixed media
Elven Princess2010, nickel, brass, leather, gemstones
Elven Princess
2010, nickel, brass, leather, gemstones

The detail on de Boer’s work is incredible. Here’s the helmet from the outfit above:

Elven Princess2010, nickel, brass, leather, gemstones
Elven Princess helmet
2010, nickel, brass, leather, gemstone
Samurai Siamese2005, copper, brass, mixed media
Samurai Siamese
2005, copper, brass, mixed media

An article at i09 gives more information:

De Boer was already experienced at making armor when he made his first suit of cat armor for a sculpture class. He decided to explore this idea in greater depth, taking real historical armor designs and adapting them for an animal form. Today, he has dozens of helmets and full suits of armor designed with cats and mice in mind. He says that he’s never outfitted a mouse in one of his armored suits, but he has tried to armor one of his cats and has “the scars to prove it.” He says that he’s far more interested in evoking an imaginative, narrative response from people who see his armor than explore the practical merits of putting mice in mail.

Mouse armor!

Tournament Mouse - View 22006, silver, brass, wood
Tournament Mouse – View 2
2006, silver, brass, wood

Be sure to browse the rest of de Boer’s galleries.

As special lagniappe for today, go have a look at the “business cat” memes (you can also make your own by clicking on any one and adding your own caption). Here are two:

Cej

3qxdpt

h/t: Greg Mayer, Brian Switek

The Great Southern E/A/BBQ Tour: final information

February 1, 2013 • 9:36 am

My schedule for the Great Southern Evolution, Atheism, and BBQ Tour is finalized (I wish we had tee-shirts), and here is the final schedule, with links to where I’ll be speaking:

Saturday, Feb. 2: Talk on WEIT and other stuff spondored by the Fayette Freethought Society, Peachtree City Humanists and the Spalding Freethought Society, in Peachtree City, right outside Atlanta. There are two Facebook pages set up by these groups; you can get registration info and directions here or see who’s coming here. Note: although there’s a charge of $15 (which includes a drink), I am not being paid for this; the money goes to rent the venue. There’s a book-signing afterwards, and if you say the secret word (“Henri”, with the French pronunciation), I’ll sketch a cat with my autograph.

Monday, Feb. 4: Talk in Augusta, Georgia sponsored by the Central Savannah River Atheists and Agnostics: “Science and religion are incompatible” at the Jabez Sanford Performing Arts Center at 6:30 pm.  Information is here; admission is free, and there may be a book signing, but I’m not sure. If there is, the secret word applies here, as it does everywhere until Feb. 8.

Tuesday, Feb. 5: Book talk at Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina. Admission is free, information is here.

Wednesday, Feb. 6:  Book talk at 5 pm. in the Department of Biological Sciences at The University of South Carolina at Columbia. All information is available here.

Thursday, Feb. 7:  two events on Feb. 7 during Darwin Week at the College of Charleston (link takes you to all information)

4:00 p.m. Book talk (I don’t know if there’s a signing; if so, secret word applies)

7:30 p.m. A debate and then discussion on “Are science and faith incompatible?” with Dr. Lea Sweitz of the Lutheran School of Theology here in Chicago (only two blocks from my office!). I’m looking forward to this one, though I just found, by going to the link, that it’s being held in a church.

Freethought radio: Professor Ceiling Cat and other guests

February 1, 2013 • 9:32 am

I’m proud to be part of tomorrow’s (Sat., Feb. 2) interview on FreeThought Radio. Here’s the blurb:

Guest: biologist Jerry Coyne
Jerry Coyne

The Boy Scouts may be considering allowing gays, but they still deserve a Badge of Dishonor for excluding atheists. Annie Laurie and Dan discuss FFRF’s Action Alert about the Boy Scouts, complaints about religion in schools, vouchers for religious schools and patriarchal religious attitudes toward women. Then, to celebrate Darwin’s upcoming birthday, they interview biology professor Jerry Coyne, author of Why Evolution Is True.

And you can find all the information about listenening live or via podcast here.  My segment is short: about 15 minutes in toto, I think, but I do talk about this website.

Eddie-ism won’t die

February 1, 2013 • 5:18 am

The fisherman Eddie of Wiley Miller’s Non Sequitur apparently founded a religion when he appeared to walk on water, though it was really only a few inches deep due to low tide.  Today, tired of the adulation of the faithful, he tries to show them the facts and his nondivinity, only to realize that religion is impervious to facts!

Click to enlarge:

nq130201

Rationalization! I wonder how many of the readers are really seeing the satire here?

Yesterday’s strip:

nq130131

And the day before:

nq130130

 

h/t: Linda Grilli

A katydid talks to evolution

February 1, 2013 • 5:09 am

Starting today, posting will be light for a while as I’m embarking on the Great Southern Evolution, Atheism, and Barbecue Tour. I plan to resume regular posting around February 11, but am hoping that Greg and Matthew will step into the breach.

Here’s another from the “true facts” series of videos: “True facts about leaf katydids.” The dialogue is amusing, but the photographs and videos are amazing.

Leaf katydids are, to me, the paradigm of natural selection, for they show how close selection can take an animal toward an “optimum” phenotype. It’s not often that we can see how close selection in nature has taken an animal towards “perfection,” and there are many factors preventing the attainment of that perfection: the availability of the right mutations, constraints on development that prevent perfect mimicry because those genes have other roles in the organism, and so on. And in most cases humans can’t even discern what the “optimum” really is. At least in cases of mimicry like this, we know what the optimum is (precise mimicry of a leaf to protect one from predators) and can see that those other factors haven’t been important.

Some day I’ll do a post on cases in which natural selection has taken organisms almost right to their optimum.

h/t: Michael

Simon’s cat interviews Henri

January 31, 2013 • 4:27 pm

In a hard-hitting, gato a gato interview, Simon’s Cat interviews the internet sensation Henri, the Dolorous Existential Moggie. It’s at Simon’s site, and the entire interview is below:

Simon’s Cat Asks…

SC: So Henri, what is your favourite sleeping place?

HLCN (Henri, le Chat Noir): I don’t limit myself to any particular place for any of the 15 hours a day I sleep. I just lie down wherever the mood strikes me.

SC: Okay. Um, what is your favourite toy?

HLCN: Toys are diversions that humans use to keep us distracted from real thought. More cats might join me in pondering the deeper mysteries of the world if they were not distracted by jingling plastic balls.

SC: Of course. Er, what is your most annoying habit?

HLCN: I assume you mean in others? L’imbecile blanc tends to bat me in the ears while he is sleeping. It is very annoying.

SC: So, what is your most lovable trait?

HLCN: I prefer to be respected more than to be loved. That said, probably my chest fur.

SC: What would you say your most memorable moment was?

HLCN: My memories are like coins in the devil’s purse. When you open it you find only dead leaves.

Watch all of Simon’s animations here, and find Henri’s lucubrations here.

Picture 1Picture 2