Do astronauts carry suicide pills?

April 2, 2026 • 10:45 am

This is a question I’ve entertained for a long time, probably because I’m preoccupied with death.  But I was curious about what would happen if astronauts, like the ones going around the Moon now, found themselves stranded in space with no way to get home, facing death from oxygen depletion or starvation. Or what would happen if the astronauts who were on the Moon years couldn’t start up the Lunar Module to get back to the Command Module and then back to Earth? Would they have been carrying something that would allow them to commit suicide quickly, avoiding a prolonged death?

I asked Jim Batterson, our resident NASA expert, and he didn’t know the answer.  I then turned to the AI bot Grok, which I got for free when X (“Twitter”)—for reasons unknown—gave me a free blue checkmark.

My question to Grok  is in bold below, and the short answer (indented) is that no, American astronauts don’t carry anything to do themselves in, though one Russian astronaut did.  Grok went though the data in 11 seconds, and spat out the following. Note that there are references (the bot gives you the links, which I haven’t included) to check the statements.

Do the astronauts carry cyanide capsules or anything they can use to commit suicide if they are stuck in space?
Thought for 11s

No, astronauts do not carry cyanide capsules or any dedicated suicide pills as standard equipment.

iflscience.com

NASA has never issued suicide pills (sometimes called “L-pills” or cyanide capsules) to its astronauts, including during the Apollo lunar missions or on current ISS and Artemis programs. Astronaut Jim Lovell (Apollo 13 commander) explicitly debunked this long-standing rumor: “Since Apollo 13 many people have asked me, ‘Did you have suicide pills on board?’ We didn’t, and I never heard of such a thing in the eleven years I spent as an astronaut and NASA executive.”

iflscience.com

The idea appears to stem from spy-movie tropes, urban legends, or sci-fi (e.g., the film Contact), but it has been consistently denied by NASA and astronauts. Multiple sources, including direct statements from astronauts, confirm that no such pills have ever been part of U.S. spaceflight medical kits.

quora.com

Why the rumor persists, and why pills aren’t needed anywayIn a worst-case scenario of being stranded in space with no rescue possible (e.g., a failed re-entry or detached during a spacewalk), astronauts have pointed out that the vacuum of space itself provides a relatively quick way to end life if someone chose to—by simply opening a suit valve or venting the spacecraft’s atmosphere. This would cause unconsciousness in seconds and death shortly after, making a pill unnecessary.

theguardian.com

NASA’s focus is on prevention and survival: rigorous psychological screening, crew training, rescue protocols (e.g., multiple docked return vehicles on the ISS), and detailed medical kits. Those kits contain painkillers, anti-nausea drugs, antibiotics, etc., but nothing lethal like cyanide.

nasa.gov

If an astronaut were to experience a mental health crisis in space (e.g., becoming suicidal or psychotic), NASA has written procedures: crewmates are instructed to restrain the person with duct tape and bungee cords, monitor them, and administer sedatives like Haldol or Valium (orally or by injection if needed). The goal is stabilization, not euthanasia.

cbsnews.com

One historical exception (Soviet side) The only verified case involves Soviet cosmonaut Alexei Leonov (the first person to spacewalk, in 1965 on Voskhod 2). He stated that he was issued a suicide pill for that specific high-risk mission—in case he couldn’t re-enter the spacecraft and his crewmate had to leave him behind in orbit. His suit ballooned during the walk, and he barely made it back inside after partially depressurizing it. This was not standard practice for the Soviet program overall, and no evidence exists of it being routine for cosmonauts then or now.

iflscience.com

In short, modern astronauts (NASA, ESA, Roscosmos, etc.) rely on engineering, training, and international rescue plans rather than personal suicide options. No agency equips crews with cyanide or equivalent for “stuck in space” scenarios.

Guest post: Shuttle astronauts to return to Earth at last (?)

March 12, 2025 • 11:00 am

When the two American astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams were stranded at the International Space Station (ISS) last June because their return vehicle had a problem that could not be fixed, I wailed to my friend Jim Batterson (a former employee at NASA) that they were going to die.  How could they survive if they couldn’t get back? Batterson (“Bat”) reassured me that there were plenty of vehicles that could bring them home, and there was nothing to worry about.  But their one-week visit turned into nine months of waiting, and my wailing increased. (To be sure, they did seem happy to have an extended stay on the ISS, since they like being in space.)

Well, it now looks like they’re coming home, so I have one less thing (among millions!) to worry about. I got the good news from Bat yesterday in an email, and asked him to expand it as a post, but also to keep some of the wording in his orginal email to me, which is beneath the asterisks. Bat’s post, original and fleshed out, are indented.

In 2014, contracts were awarded to SpaceX and to Boeing to each develop ways to take human crews to the International Space Station (ISS) and return them safely to Earth.  SpaceX’s Crew Dragon capsule was developed and has been operating successfully since 2020. It’s also used (along with Russian vehicles) to effect crew rotations of the ISS about every six months.  The Boeing Starliner capsule, after much delay, underwent a crewed test flight to ISS last June with two senior NASA astronauts onboard: Barry (Butch) Wilmore and Sunita (Suni) Williams.  The mission called for them to rendezvous and dock with the ISS and to stay aboard ISS for a week. But unexpected anomalies on the Starliner during rendezvous and docking led to NASA delaying their return until Boeing could understand and fix the cause of the anomalies.

After several months of testing both the docked Starliner and ground-based models, the problem was neither understood nor resolved, to NASA’s satisfaction. The astronauts could not be safely returned on this vehicle, so Starliner returned to Earth, uncrewed, in September 2024, having a soft landing in the New Mexico desert.  Astronauts Butch and Suni, as veterans of previous ISS missions, were integrated into the standing ISS crew to work and await the appearance of two future capsule seats for return to Earth.

Those seats finally appeared when the Crew 9 SpaceX capsule with two astronauts and two empty seats docked with the ISS in Septemberl, 2024.  The Crew 9 capsule is scheduled to undock and return to Earth with four astronauts—including Butch and Suni—in the next week or so.  Meanwhile four fresh astronauts (Crew 10) are scheduled to launch in a SpaceX capsule on Wednesday, March 12 and spend a week getting the ISS duties handed over to them.

This has been an excellent use of the ISS as a “safe haven” for astronauts, an idea that came about after the Columbia Shuttle accident for situations in which there are safety concerns about a return vehicle, allowing astronauts to await a rescue vehicle or simply another set of available return seats.  While there is constant danger in space, NASA decided that spending time on the ISS was deemed safer than returning on the Boeing Starliner ship.

************

But now Bat is worried that I might have been right: the returning astronauts might be in some danger. From Bat’s original post:

But NOW: Jerry,

You may have been right all along, as it is unfortunately turning out.

Now I also worry about Butch and Suni.  USA Today described tomorrow’s launch (Wednesday March 12 at 7:48 PM EDT – I usually go to Space.com to get a link or C-SPAN may carry it) of Crew-10, the replacement for Butch and Suni and the two Crew9 astronauts as routine. But Jeebus…nothing about human spaceflight is routine, and as soon as people start thinking it is, we are closer to losing a crew due to inattention. Then there is Musk, who in the past few weeks has exploded two suborbital spacecraft, raining debris down on the National Airspace System and on populated Caribbean islands, leading to significant flight delays and endangering 100’s if not 1000’s of air passengers.  I am convinced that Musk’s inattention to his launches led to at least the second failure and maybe both since it appears to me that he is the kind of hands-on boss whose constant physical presence makes a huge difference. So with him running all over the world as Trump’s chief of federal gov’t chaos, his space operations are running on autopilot for maybe the first time.  Both the booster rocket and the capsule for Crew 10 tomorrow are SpaceX products as is the Crew 9 capsule, currently docked at Station, which Butch and Suni are scheduled to return to Earth in sometime in the next several days.

And of course NASA has just announced a Reduction in Force per Trump’s and Musk’s actions, which has to get pretty much everyone’s (in NASA) attention.

Here’s Butch and Suni talking about their return. Look how her hair stands up in zero gravity!

Livestream from Earth: video from the International Space Station

February 2, 2025 • 1:05 pm

Here’s a livestream video you may want to check in on from time to time. As Space.com describes, it’s from the ISS:

Cameras are officially rolling! Or, in this case, streaming.

SpaceTV-1, a set of Ultra High Definition 4k cameras from space streaming company Sen, was delivered to the International Space Station (ISS) last year, and is now broadcasting live views of Earth and space for all the world to see.

The London-based company is pursuing a mission to provide anyone and everyone with easy access to an experience usually reserved for astronauts — the overview effect. A phenomenon coined for the awe of seeing our planet from space and the effect it has on a person’s perception of humanity, Apollo 14‘s lunar module pilot NASA astronaut Ed Mitchell described the overview effect as, “an instant global consciousness,” accompanied with “an intense dissatisfaction with the state of the world and a compulsion to do something about it,” and Sen wants that for everybody.

. . . The SpaceTV-1 camera suite was delivered to the ISS in March, 2024, aboard a SpaceX Dragon spacecraft on the CRS-30 cargo mission last year. SpaceTV-1 was attached to the Bartolomeo platform on the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Columbus module. The package includes three cameras, providing three unique views of space around the ISS and Earth below.

A wide angle lens captures the long curve of Earth’s horizon, with the occasional piece of the space station moving in and out of frame. A tighter view focuses directly on Earth, showing a stretch about 150 miles x 110 miles (240 kilometers x 180 kilometers). The third camera looks at the space station’s forward docking port, connected the the Harmony module.

It’s very easy to get mesmerized by the video, but you can always keep it in the background of your computer screen (there are some replays as there is signal loss when the ISS is on the other side of Earth from the receiver, but there are also helpful descriptions at the bottom of the screen. It is a YouTube video.

Sunrise is very soon!

h/t: Ginger K.

 

Readers’ wildlife photographs

May 22, 2024 • 8:15 am

If you have good wildlife photos, don’t forget to send them in!  Thanks.

Today’s theme is astronomical phenomena, and we have two contributors. Both contributors’ words are indented, and you can enlarge the photos by clicking on them.

First, Bryan Lepore sends two photos and a video.

I submit two photos of the geomagnetic storm on Friday, 10 May, 2024 as viewed from latitude ~42 N ~71 W (Massachusetts), at about 10 PM.

Bryan adds this figure, which comes from a tweet by AuroraAlerts:

One more item occurred to me that should fit with the aurora photos : a map from Aurora Alerts on 10 May :

… you can see it goes down to New England. So I saw that indoors, and immediately stepped outside. Readers can scroll through Aurora Alerts to see the info, and I recommend subscribing.  I think there is supposed to be more solar activity than usual in the next so many months – some cyclic activity of many years length (I’d need a refresher).

Bryan also made a short video for YouTube showing the International Space Station flying by during the aurora:

Our second contributor is Rik Gern, who sent photos taken the day of the eclipse:

Here is a small batch that represents all the remaining pictures I currently have processed and ready to go. They are of varying quality, but there is a theme running thru them; they were all taken in my yard in Austin, TX on April 6th, the day of the full eclipse.

Where I live the totality lasted for about 90 seconds and I didn’t bother to try to photograph the eclipse itself because a lot of people who know a lot more about photography than I do were setting up to take and share some nice pictures of the corona and other great effects. Instead, because I was fascinated by the rapidly changing light, I took pictures of plant life around the yard as the early afternoon light got steadily darker and everything started to look like evening time, but without the long shadows. It was subtly disorienting.

The first picture is of one of my favorite volunteer plants, the false dayflower (Tinantia anomala).  I love the “face” in the flower! This species initially made an appearance in the yard about ten years ago and at first there weren’t many, but when I discovered what a good looking plant it is I let it grow pretty much wherever it made an appearance and now it dominates the back end by the compost pile.

This next plant, common hedge parsley, aka spreading hedge parsley or tall sock-destroyer (Trills arvensis), wasn’t fully in bloom at the time. Even when it does bloom the flowers are very tiny and easy to overlook. The leaves remind me of carrot tops, though I don’t know if they’re related.

The tufted yellow woodsorrell (Oxalis priceae) was growing at the base of a cactus plant. For the longest time I confused woodsorrel with clover and they do look similar, but their flowers are different and unlike clover, woodsorrel in not a nitrogen-fixing plant and livestock shouldn’t graze on it. Both are bee friendly though. You can learn more about the similarities and differences here.

It was too early in the year to observe flowers on this spineless prickly pear cactus (Opuntia ellisiana), but the new pads that appear every year are intriguing in their own right.This picture was taken just a few seconds before the eclipse reached totality.

Despite a light cloud cover at the time, the total eclipse was dramatic and picturesque, and I can understand why people travel a great distance to observe the phenomenon. The eclipse’s totality inspired the hours of photoshop processing that transformed the cactus picture into this personification of nature.

SpaceX Starship launch this morning: 8 a.m. Eastern time, 7 a.m. Central (now delayed by about an hour)

March 14, 2024 • 5:30 am

Big Rocket Launch this morning: a test of the SpaceX Starship. It will launch from Texas, test the firing of two boosters and the payload door, and then (fingers crossed) a splashdown planned in the Indian Ocean. The flight time will be one hour and 4 minutes, and this time the rockets, though designed to be recovered, apparently won’t be recovered.

Set your alarm for 8 a.m. if you’re on the East Coast, 7 a.m. Central or corresponding times in other places. But the livestream begins half an hour before those times. You can watch the prep and launch either site given below.

This site gives information about the vehicle and launch, and also links to the SpaceX video.

From Jon and Bat, we hear of a SpaceX launch this morning.

This from Bat:

According SpaceX and news outlets, the big launch is on for a 110 minute window commencing at 0700 central time Thursday morning.  Launch is from SpaceX launch complex in Texas. The rocket is over 400 ft tall.  She’s a big ‘un!  Live Coverage begins at SpaceX website 30 minutes before scheduled launch so that would be 0630 Central Time.

This is the big rocket that Elon Musk is developing for big Moon mission payloads and on to Mars. He claims that they are using an “engineering approach”:  test often and learn from failure: you really don’t want failure but when you get it, you use it to improve the vehicle and its control.

A video of the launch should be at the site below (click to go there, and then click on “watch”; there’s another launch video site below):

Here’s the official announcement:

The third flight test of Starship is targeted to launch Thursday, March 14. The 110-minute test window opens at 7:00 a.m. CT.

You can watch the live launch webcast at SpaceX.com/launches or on X.com/SpaceX starting approximately 30 minutes ahead of liftoff.

The third flight test aims to build on what we’ve learned from previous flights while attempting a number of ambitious objectives, including the successful ascent burn of both stages, opening and closing Starship’s payload door, a propellant transfer demonstration during the upper stage’s coast phase, the first ever re-light of a Raptor engine while in space, and a controlled reentry of Starship. It will also fly a new trajectory, with Starship targeted to splashdown in the Indian Ocean. This new flight path enables us to attempt new techniques like in-space engine burns while maximizing public safety.

This rapid iterative development approach has been the basis for all of SpaceX’s major innovative advancements, including Falcon, Dragon, and Starlink. Recursive improvement is essential as we work to build a fully reusable transportation system capable of carrying both crew and cargo to Earth orbit, help humanity return to the Moon, and ultimately travel to Mars and beyond.

Excitement guaranteed!

Here’s a YouTube site:

Uncrewed Moon landing this afternoon

February 22, 2024 • 9:15 am

A “soft” landing of an uncrewed vehicle, built by NASA in conjunction with a commercial company, will take place this afternoon: 5:30 4:24 p.m. EST Jim Batterson gives the details and links where you can watch/hear it live.  This landing has hardly been in the news, but it certainly deserves our attention.

NASA/Intuitive Machines -1 Landing on the Moon Thursday Afternoon

by Jim Batterson

NASA, in collaboration with Intuitive Machines, is scheduled to soft-land an uncrewed payload near the Moon’s South Pole at 5:30 4:24PM EST this afternoon [RESCHEDULED].  If successful, this will be the first U.S. soft landing on the moon since the final Apollo mission of the early 70’s.

The mission was launched last week on a Space-X Falcon rocket from Cape Kennedy and, after several successful mid-course maneuvers is, as of this morning, orbiting the moon just 57 miles above the Lunar surface.  About an hour before the planned landing, a series of onboard rocket motors are scheduled to fire and take it out of orbit to a steady one meter/secpmd touchdown on the Lunar surface. The lander will take photographs, make soil measurements, and carry out scientific experiments.  In carrying out this mission, U.S. capabilities in space are extended to a commercial company as a part of NASA’s efforts to support more robust launch and landing capabilities by the private sector and to test and validate—on uncrewed missions—new technologies that can be used in the Artemis human crews to the moon program.

As a part of NASA’s return to the moon for a planned permanent presence, the NASA Artemis Program is developing a heavy, crew-rated launch system.  Many of us watched a major uncrewed launch in that program a bit over a year ago as a huge rocket sent an Orion capsule, which will be used to fly and land a human crew on the moon in the next few years, around the moon and back to Earth with a successful splashdown and recovery.  It is my understanding that a post-flight review of the capsule’s heat shield showed excess sublimation (melting and conversion to gas) over what was expected and that resolution of this issue and other abnormalities may delay the crewed Artemis 2 launch and circumlunar trajectory currently planned for Fall 2025, which of course would impact the crewed Artemis 3 launch—one that will carry a crew and soft-land them on the Moon in Fall of 2026.  A Wikipedia listing of the currently planned Artemis Program missions through the mid-2030’s can be seen here.

This current mission, IM-1 (Intuitive Machines 1) is the second in a series of uncrewed Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) missions that support the development of technologies to be incorporated in the Artemis crewed missions.  CLPS is a NASA program that, as its name implies, enlists commercial vendors to build, integrate, and operate compact, uncrewed space missions to prepare hardware on a fast pace parallel with the development of the main Artemis Mission crewed landings on the moon.  The idea is that using several commercial vendors creates capacity and know-how more quickly and cheaply than doing in situ testing of new space technologies.

The first of the CLPS series, Peregrine One, experienced a failure after launch last month.  The next scheduled launch after IM-1 will be in the Fall of this year and will be operated by commercial vendor, Firefly Aerospace.  This current mission, operated by the commercial vendor, Intuitive Machines was launched early last Thursday morning and is scheduled to soft-land near the South Pole of the Moon this Thursday afternoon.

As of 0830 EST this morning, the vehicle is in a circular orbit 57 miles above the moon. About an hour before the planned 1730 EST landing on Thursday afternoon, retrorockets will elongate its orbit to 67mi x 6 mi with the 6 mile high point being just above the landing site.  When the orbit reaches the 6 mi altitude point, another retrorocket firing and braking will be started and the vehicle will drop down to a soft landing in the region of the South Lunar Pole with touchdown expected at 1730EST. . . if all goes well!  Live updates are provided at the Intuitive Machines mission website, where there’s a nice write-up and link to live coverage of landing, coverage that should start about one hour before the expected 1730EST touchdown on Space.com at the site below:

One last thought:  One factor prompting this U.S. project is a bit different than the main cold-war driver of the Apollo program in the 1960’s.  Then we had a single competitor, the USSR, but that was seen as a competition for technological success of a democracy versus a Communist dictatorship.  After World War II, nobody else had the economy and technology to attempt a feat like a manned moon landing.  Today there are five nations that have hit the moon: China, Russia, Japan, India, and the U.S.  (Only the U.S. has actually landed humans on the Moon.) It turns out that there are concerns about any of these nations claiming possession of locations and minerals via landing there.

Here’s Wikipedia’s rendering of the Nova-C lander on the surface of the Moon (from Wikipedia and the Smithsonian Institution)