Man removes owl from his house using a Swiffer®

June 23, 2014 • 2:23 pm

Here are two short videos which show a man removing an owl from his home with a Swiffer, which is an American cleaning implement consisting of a an expensive rag on a stick. I didn’t know much about these videos but found this information from the Kansas City Star when I Googled “Swiffer’:

So the cat dragged an owl into Colton Wright’s house and being the smart fellow that he is he grabbed the first thing he could think of to remove the winged intruder: A Swiffer.

Anyone else see a TV commercial coming out of this?

Wright, now dubbed “The Owl Whisperer,” posted two YouTube videos last week that show his hair-raising adventure that went on for more than 45 minutes.

Be forewarned, he cusses. Not surprising, because we can tell you right now that if this happened to us, we’d be cursin’ too.

“Sadly, I found out through this video I scream. Not just scream, but borderline hysterics,” he noted about the first video.

Man, any cat that can catch an owl and bring it inside deserves a medal. Fortunately, the owl appears unhurt:

Owl Removal:

Then somehow he manages to hold a Swiffer in one hand and his phone in the other to videotape the remarkable removal process.

Our hand would have been shaking as we stared down that unblinking big-eyed bird of prey on the end of the sweeper.

“He was sucking my soul out,” Wright joked to one media outlet.

 
I’m sure at least one reader knows what species this owl is.

Wikileaks released Kent Hovind’s doctoral thesis

June 23, 2014 • 8:16 am

Reader Shep called my attention to the fact that Wikileaks released, of all things, Kent Hovind’s doctoral dissertation, which, according to Shep, “has been kept under lock and key by Patriot University since 1991.” According to RationalWiki, though, the dissertation has actually been available since 2009.

Most of you have probably heard of Kent Hovind, who was a prominent young-earth creationist , a Baptist, and founder of the organization Creation Science Evangelism. But at the end of 2006 he was convicted of tax malfeasance, sentenced to ten years in a Florida pen, and is scheduled to be released in 2015. His son Eric now runs the creationist organization, and Eric and Chad, Kent’s other son, also run a God-will-make-you-rich scam called “Godonomics”, on which I’ve posted before.

Kent Hovind’s thesis has a spotty history. First of all, it’s from a dubious school: Patriot Bible University in Del Norte, Colorado.  It’s been called a “diploma mill,” selling degrees earned in only a few months. This photo shows the entire university:

PatriotUniv1

Pretty impressive, eh? The Harvard of Del Norte!

As for Hovind’s degree, Wikipedia notes

In 1988 and 1991 respectively, Hovind was awarded a master’s degree and doctorate in Christian Education through correspondence from the non-accredited Patriot University in Colorado Springs, Colorado (now Patriot Bible University in Del Norte, Colorado, which no longer offers this program). Having a website called “Dr. Dino” has provoked some academics to look closely at how Hovind presents his education and credentials. Barbara Forrest, a professor of philosophy, expert on the history of creationism and activist in the creation-evolution controversy, wrote that Hovind’s lack of academic training makes it impossible to engage him on a professional level.

Patriot Bible University is a diploma mill, as it has unreasonably low graduation requirements, lack of sufficient faculty or educational standards, and a suspicious tuition scheme. The school’s current policies allow students to attain bachelor’s degrees, master’s degrees, and Doctor of Ministry degrees in months, rather than years, for as little as $37 per credit.

Bartelt has stated that Hovind’s doctoral dissertation is evidence of the poor requirements at Patriot and that Hovind lacks knowledge of basic science. She noted that Hovind’s dissertation is incomplete (it contains four chapters totaling 101 pages, but Hovind’s introduction claims the work is 250 pages with 16 chapters), of low academic quality, with poor writing, poor spelling, and poor grammatical style. Bartelt asserts that pages are repeated, references are absent, and it is not an original work with original ideas.

I wouldn’t waste a lot of time looking at the thesis, but you can find it at the Wikileaks page here, and download the pdf here.

Here’s the title page and the beginning of the introduction. Never in my life have I seen an introduction begin in this way!

Intro page Screen shot 2014-06-23 at 6.52.42 AM

Hello, Kent! How are you?

At any rate, in the introduction Hovind says there will be sixteen chapters, but I count only four (they’re not numbered):

Screen shot 2014-06-23 at 6.59.22 AM

It’s standard boilerplate creationism, with the usual accusations that evolution is a religion (a false one), that the only kind of “evolution” is microevolution, as well as a tedious introductory history of creationism and a lot of Biblical exegesis. While claiming that evolution is a religion, he says stuff like this:

Screen shot 2014-06-23 at 7.01.53 AM

I wonder what Ken Miller would think of that! And, speaking of errors, here’s one:

Screen shot 2014-06-23 at 6.56.02 AM

It is indeed 110 pages long, and here’s the last one:

Hovind

On this basis Hovind calls himself “Doctor Hovind,” and even listed himself that way in the telephone book! While his school is not accredited, claiming a Ph.D from it is still a travesty.

Christopher Hitchens said, in his famous “obiturary” of Jerry Falwell on CNN:

“The empty life of this ugly little charlatan proves only one thing: that you can get away with the most extraordinary offenses to morality and to truth in this country if you can just get yourself called ‘reverend.'”

Hovind’s life shows that you can get away with the most extraordinary offenses to truth and to science if you can just get yourself called “doctor.”

 

Reader’s wildlife photos: the story of Rita and Rocco

June 23, 2014 • 6:35 am

Reader Ed Kroc from Vancouver sent photos and a story about the kind of biological drama that goes on all around us, completely unnoticed. This one involves geese and gulls. (Click pictures to enlarge.)

I wanted to pass along a sequence of photos illustrating the eventful few months a gull pair across the street from me has had.  These aren’t particularly good photos from an artistic point of view; I only have access to a single, far away view.  But I thought you might like the story they tell.  I’ll explain in words too, if you can forgive any unintended verbosity.

I am lucky enough to have at least partial views of the nesting sites of several gull pairs from my apartment.  They are all glaucous-winged gulls (Larus glaucescens), the typical Vancouver gull.  A few of these pairs I’ve watched for several years now.  I always struggle with my desire to anthropomorphize other animals, and probably have a tendency to project my own emotions onto them a bit too often.  But nevertheless, I am confident claiming that at least some of these gulls exhibit distinct personalities, and one of the surest ways this is manifest is in their associations with their respective partners.  The pair depicted in these pictures, whom I have somewhat arbitrarily dubbed Rocco and Rita, are one of the more affectionate pairs I have had the pleasure to watch.

On to the pictures.  We start off in mid-April.  You may recall a couple photos I forwarded along about a month ago of a Canada goose family my partner and I helped rescue off the roof of a building across the street from our apartment.  As I mentioned briefly then, that mother goose had chosen to lay her eggs on top of a gull pair’s annual nesting site….  The first photo shows Rocco and Rita camped out next to the mother goose on her clutch, Rita glaring.

1RR watching goose

In mid-May, about a week after the goslings hatched and were relocated to Stanley Park, Rocco and Rita started laying their own clutch on the rooftop.  Interestingly, they did not use the same location that they had in the past, presumably because the geese had nested there.  Instead, they moved their nest to a central location on the small rooftop, which is unusual for urban gulls as it leaves them more exposed to predators and to the elements.  Perhaps this was a purposely brazen attempt to reassert their territorial claim?

Regardless, shortly after the first egg was laid, the geese pair actually started returning to the nesting site, thinking the territory was still theirs.  They had paired up with two other Canada goose families in Stanley Park by then, so both adults could sometimes leave the chicks with the other guardians.  Now though, the intrusion would not be tolerated peaceably by the gulls.  The pair would buzz and dive-bomb the geese, and the geese would respond by ducking and hissing, stubbornly refusing to budge.  This ugliness went on for several days, at least four times per day (likely more as I was out of the apartment for much of the day).  Each round would last 10-15 minutes, ending in either the geese getting annoyed enough to leave, or the gulls tiring and so settling to wait the intruders out on a nearby parapet.

2RR attacking geese

In the attached picture, you can see a single drab, greenish egg in the gull’s nest in the middle of the roof, as the male attacks one of the geese.  There is in fact a second egg in this picture, but it has been kicked out of the nest by one of the geese as it ran for cover (it’s at 7:30 from the egg inside the nest, but blends in well with the surrounding greenery).  This second egg was destroyed in the fight and was probably consumed later by the female gull for energy.

Thankfully, this conflict was not too prolonged.  After four days, the geese realized this territory was no longer theirs and stopped coming by.  The third picture shows Rita returning to her nest with the single surviving egg.  She laid her third and final egg a few days later.

3RR with egg

The rest of the incubation period went by uneventfully.  The fourth picture shows Rocco on the nest love-biting Rita.  Gulls always share incubation duties quite evenly, but they don’t always keep each other company.  Rocco and Rita are one pair that seems to enjoy spending time together.  Often, as one sits on the nest, the other will sit very close by.  Sometimes too the one on the nest will gently bite and tug at their partner’s chest.

4RR love biting

Finally, last week the two chicks were ready to unegg themselves.  The fifth picture shows Rocco trading spots with Rita as she nuzzles her body against the newborns (one day old) inside the nest.

5RR with newborns

Gull chicks are precocial and typically leave the nest cup within 24-36 hours after birth.  The next day, Rocco and Rita were each feeding the chicks bits of regurgitated fish or seastar meat, as in the sixth picture.  Note the excellent camouflage the chicks come equipped with, especially when viewed against the backdrop of the nest itself.

6RR feeding time

The last picture shows the family resting together mid-afternoon.  Rocco sits on the nest with one of the chicks warm underneath, and the other literally under wing (you can see the top of the chick’s head poking out between the father’s wing and body).  Rita nuzzles in right next to her partner.  I don’t have a huge observational sample to draw from, but this behaviour is not typical among the other gull pairs that I can watch.  They all share parenting duties quite evenly, and help each other out as needed, but this is the only pair I have witnessed that seems to display this level of presumably unnecessary affection toward each other.  I’m not sure what to make of that, maybe nothing.  But it is interesting!

7RR family

Today’s footie

June 23, 2014 • 6:04 am

OMG, the U.S. almost beat Portugal! Save for a Portuguese goal in the last minute of play, the U.S.would have advanced (I’m not particularly rooting for them, but since Spain went out of contention I’ve decided to root for promising underdogs like Ghana). Ronaldo was largely ineffectual because of a good U.S. defense (the keeper is great), but he did hit a cross that was converted into a goal by a header. (Is that the right language?) The U.S. plays Germany on Thursday.

Anyway, here’s today’s footie schedule, with several good games. Note that there are no 5 p.m. (Chicago time) games, so somehow I’ll have to sneak in one while I’m working. Maybe Netherlands vs. Chile?

Screen shot 2014-06-23 at 7.52.26 AM

Here are 4 minutes of US/Portugal highlights (the video’s pretty lousy, but watch quickly before FIFA has it taken down):

Google Doodles are going up at about three per day (one per game, I think), and I can’t keep track. Here’s the latest animated one; click on the screenshot to see it. It’s pretty funny.

Screen shot 2014-06-23 at 7.49.19 AM