How not to write a comment on this site

December 19, 2016 • 11:15 am

Re this morning’s discussion of grammar and words that irk the readers, the number of comments surprised me. Note, though, that my post was mainly about usages that disturb me and my readers, not whether they are taken by grammarians as correct. Ergo lots of people corrected me about the use of the word “hopefully” to mean “I hope that” (a usage I don’t like) versus the meaning “with hope” (the one I use). I recognize that both usages are seen by some experts as fine, and of course readers noted that.

But there are ways and ways of commenting. Here is the good way: a comment made by reader Don:

“Hopefully,” used as a sentence adverb, is fine. If I may repeat what I have posted below, Richard Nordquist writes, “The sentence adverb has served a useful function in English since the 14th century. In the past few decades, however, one sentence adverb in particular has come in for a lot of criticism.” He’s referring to “hopefully.”

He goes on to give a variety of examples, saying, “Unlike an ordinary adverb–which is conventionally defined as a word that modifies a verb, adjective, or other adverb–a sentence adverb modifies a sentence as a whole or a clause within a sentence.

“Dozens of words can be used as sentence adverbs, among them actually, apparently, basically, briefly, certainly, clearly, conceivably, confidentially, curiously, evidently, fortunately, hopefully, however, ideally, incidentally, indeed, interestingly, ironically, naturally, predictably, presumably, regrettably, seriously, strangely, surprisingly, thankfully, theoretically, therefore, truthfully, ultimately, and wisely.”

Note that this is a polite and civil comment, and I took it in (though I still won’t use “hopefully” as an adverb).

Here is the way not to comment; I put this up and then banned the reader “malvolioblog” for incivility:

No, it doesn’t mean only that, any more than “thankfully” only means “done in a thankful manner.” Sorry, but this is a case, as with so-called “split infinitives,” where people are trying to be hyper-correct — and thereby getting it wrong. Please stick to your biology, Prof. Coyne, leave the grammar to us writers.

(I certainly agree with you, though, about ‘I could care less’, but that is becoming idiomatic, in speech, at least. Probably a losing battle. Never acceptable in writing, except as recorded speech.)

The part in bold is simply rude, and I don’t want people like this commenting here. If you’re a first-time reader, read “Da Roolz” for commenting on the left bar, or go here. You’ll then understand why a comment like that accrues its author a permanent ban.

I don’t understand why people can’t be civil like Don. Why must they pull rank and be rude to their host? Oh well, such is humanity.

WEIT joins Oxford’s “Landmark Science” series

April 25, 2016 • 12:30 pm

I haven’t rewritten WEIT, and, sadly, didn’t have time to write a new foreword to the book, but it’s just joined the Oxford University Press’s “Landmark Science” Series, acquiring a spiffy new cover (the design of all the covers is similar):

Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 11.47.19 AM

Here’s a complete list:

Daniel Nettle: Personality
Richard Dawkins: The Selfish Gene
Dawkins: The Extended Phenotype
Dawkins (ed.): The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing
Roger Penrose: The Emperor’s New Mind
Addy Pross: What is Life?
Nick Lane: Oxygen
James Lovelock: Gaia
Michio Kaku: Hyperspace
Jerry Coyne: WEIT

Here’s Nick Lane’s Oxygen for comparison:

41OFDt-mMOL._SX327_BO1,204,203,200_

And The Selfish Gene, which is in its 40th Anniversary edition and so gets a special black cover:

41kxjORzNUL._SX320_BO1,204,203,200_

Readers’ wildlife photographs

August 21, 2015 • 7:30 am

We have a diversity of fauna (and flora) today. We’ll begin with a lovely photograph by Stephen Barnard: a honeybee (Apis sp.) in flight over a Rocky Mountain bee plant (Cleome serrulata):

Barnard Bee

Reader Leo Glenn, who identifies himself as “the staff of Baxter and Gremlin”, has a caterpillar:

As you just posted a reader’s (Matthew Rave) wildlife photo of a Giant Leopard Moth [Hypercompe scribonia], I thought your readers might like to see what the caterpillar looks like. We don’t see many of the moths, but the caterpillars are frequent visitors on our property in western Pa., in the late summer and early fall. They are magnificent creatures.

Leo Glenn

We don’t often get underwater photographs, yet the sea is teeming with great species. Reader Jeff Gawthorpe sent a selection of pictures taken by him and his friends, including two mimics:

I’ve attached some of the photos from my trip last year to the Red Sea. They were all taken in or around Makadi bay near Hurghada in Egypt and all during the first week or two of November last year. It’s a great time to visit the area because just as the weather is getting greyer and colder here in Yorkshire, it’s still 30 Celsius over there with sea temperatures hovering between 26 and 27! I’ve been three times in the last few years and will hopefully be going again later in the year (international situation permitting). As you can see, the abundance and variety of marine life in the area is amazing. You’ll notice from the lighting that the sun is quite low in some photos as we tend to snorkel at sunrise when the nocturnal animals are still lurking around the reefs before disappearing into their hiding places when the sun gets up.  By the way I can’t claim exclusivity as the photographer here – the pictures are a group effort between myself and my friends Ania and Konrad.

This first one is a houndfish (Tylosurus crocodilus). We used to joke about how vain this fish was because it was in the same place every single morning being pampered by bluestreak cleaner wrasse (Labroides dimidiatus). You (and many readers) will no doubt be aware that this species has a Batesian mimic called Aspidontus taeniatus [JAC: the “false cleaner fish”] which makes use of its disguise to take sneaky bites from unsuspecting fish hoping to be groomed.

Houndfish

This next one is a spot-fin porcupine fish (Diodon hystrix), it’s pretty unusual to see these out in open water as they are usually quite shy, preferring to lurk under ledges. They are extremely cute in real life. This one was pretty big – over 60 cm.

ppine

Here is another member of the porcupine fish family (Diodontidae), and as you can see it has a similar appearance to the Diodon hystrix with those spines and big eyes. This is a yellowspotted burrfish (Cyclihthys spilostylus) and, like other porcupine fish, they like to hide under ledges during the day.

burrfish

To my great disappointment I was not present when this picture was taken. I would have loved to swim with this pod of dolphins but I guess that will just have to wait till next time. Apparently they stayed around for about 5 minutes before swimming away. I think these are common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), but I’m not sure – I stand to be corrected.

dolphins

And here we have what I think is a black-headed heron (Ardea melanocephala) but not being an expert I might be wrong here. The bird is up early looking for breakfast before the sun gets high and drives the fish from the shallows. As far as I saw it went hungry on that particular morning.

heron

The striped mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta) [JAC: the binomial name is for the Indian mackerel, perhaps not the same species?] is another species that you never see once the sun has been up more than a short while. They can actually be quite intimidating when a large school swim towards you with open mouths. However they are filter feeders straining zooplankton as they swim, so are not going to bite! They’re not bothered in the slightest by a human’s presence, swimming really close as they go past.

mac

I don’t actually know what this once belonged to but it’s absolutely beautiful. Maybe a reader could identify it?

shell

Here are a couple of great examples of camouflage. First is a Red Sea Moses sole (Pardachirus marmoratus) doing its best to blend into the sea bed. This one stands out as it lies perpendicular to the ridges of sand on the sea bed but usually they are very difficult to spot.

sole

And here is a reef octopus (Octopus cyanea) doing its best to look like the surrounding coral. The octopus is one of the critters that you need to be up early to see – any later than 45 minutes past sunrise and they have all disappeared back to their daytime hiding places.

octopus

At first glance this looks like someone dropped a bag of tortilla chips over the sea bed but it’s actually an example of triangle turbinweed (Turbinaria decurrens) which is endemic to the Red Sea.

turbinweed

Oh and a bonus pic – this was actually taken without my knowledge and was not posed, I didn’t even know about it till we got back to the UK. I was re-reading WEIT while I was there and had been caught having a snooze while shielding my eyes from the light. I know the subject isn’t wildlife exactly—but feel free to post it if you like!

I do feel free to post it, of course! Why pass up a chance for self-promotion?

homo sapiens

WEIT turned into videos

July 13, 2015 • 9:30 am

The MassComrehension site has begun making videos of WEIT, which I think is a distillation of my words from the book.  There are two videos put up so far at the WEIT Videobook site.  The makers are eager for feeback, so if you’ve watched either or both of these, please put your comments below.

Part I: Introduction, Evolution, & Gradualism

Part II: Speciation

 

The world’s smallest copy of WEIT

June 13, 2015 • 3:45 pm

I defy any other writer on evolution to have their book presented in this way! In a comment on a recent open thread, reader Mark R. said this:

I like to build dioramas, and last week I finally published my latest that features the smallest WEIT in the world. It’s on top of the gear-pile at the rear of the ‘Greyhound’…you can see it on a couple close-ups. Could be a nightjar. I also cited the book and PCC in the copy as “my favorite book on evolution” which is also true.

You can see his amazing dioramas of army scenes at Mark-Armor, and the Sherman Tank diorama here.

This is what the whole diorama looks like, and imagine all the labor it took to build this thing, one of many war scenes he’s constructed, from scratch.

sherman-tank-diorama-big

Here’s just a bit of his description called, “Late Spring: Decisions, decisions”:

There is no doubt that certain landing sights on D-Day were obscenely more terrifying and horrific than other landing sights. The typically dramatic American movies depict Omaha beach since that was the pinnacle of Axis resistance and Allied (American) retort. However, the Allied invasion created a new dynamic to the war, one that became fully realized as Europe opened again and the Nazis retreated into smaller and smaller pockets. To slow the Allied invasion, it was a typical tactic of the Wehrmacht to blow bridges after their retreat, thus impeding the inevitable Allied onslaught.

This diorama depicts a setback in the advance of the US 7th Armored division. The setting is a small French town with the backdrop of a ruined church. There are a few soldiers trying to figure out the best continued advancement, the rest are relaxing, brooding or responding to civilians. Orders come from the top, so as an infantryman, it shouldn’t be difficult to keep steady and be patient- survival depends on it. I wanted to depict a lot of tobacco smoking as all American soldiers during WWII were supplied cigarettes as a standard part of their kit. I tried to show a few different conversations and interactions: soldiers giving/taking information, exchanging pleasantries or giving/taking orders. A rifleman generously hands a priest (presumably the destroyed church’s) a canteen; the French civilian who is obviously on clean-up duty looks on with folded arms as if grumbling: “And what about me? I’m doing all the work.” The front left corner is occupied by two elderly civilians in front of a German propaganda poster which depicts German infantry on the move. It reads: Infanterie Königen aller Waffen (Infantry, kings of all weapons). Propaganda always seems to end up biting the propagandist in the ass. The lady is struggling with a bucket of canal water, and the man offers his assistance; even in times of war, civility is not forsaken. At the end of the bridge, two engineers are sizing up the damage. One engineer is using German 10 x 50 Service Binoculars which were more powerful than the standard US 6 x 30 optics. Who knows where he found them. Two other soldiers on the bridge are looking down at the destroyed Willys in the canal, a stark reminder of war’s deadly nature.

This photo, “Sherman Tank – Rear View Detail” shows the effort it takes to make this thing:

Screen Shot 2015-06-13 at 12.07.46 PM

Another detail: soldiers on the tank (“Three tankers”). You can be sure that every bit of this is accurate:

three-tankers-on-sherman-big

And the WEIT sighting—”Soldier Sitting on Greyhound Armored Vehicle”

soldier-sitting-on-greyhound-big

It was hard to spot, but I recognized the orange cover immediately, sitting next to the crate on the right. Mark’s notes on this tiny book (and note that “a few mm” is probably about one-sixth of an inch (ca 4 mm):

Yeah, that’s it…the four critters on the front are blurry, as well as the title…too small to print…the “book” is just a few mm long. As an added bit of irony, the book was actually a part of the priest kit…it was supposed to be his bible. heehee

I have to say that I’m mighty chuffed, despite the anachronism!

WEIT book price escalates even moar (plus answers to “Name the apologist” contest)

March 22, 2015 • 7:30 am

I’m very pleased to see that the price of the autographed and Houle-illuminated copy of WEIT has gone even higher: it’s over $4K, and there’s still a week to go:

Screen shot 2015-03-22 at 4.51.06 AM

Meanwhile, over at Sean Carroll’s site, Preposterous Universe, various sourpusses (sourpodes?) predicted it wouldn’t sell for much: as one of them said, “I’m going to be straight honest as any respecting person in pursuit of scientific truth should be: the book signed by all these people is not worth $60 and never will be. Dawkins is a science populizer more than a scientist. Dennett is a Philosopher. Weinberg is the heavyweight on that list. But not going to ever be worth 2k.”

But book is worth precisely what it sells for, and, as reader Ben Goren asked another sourpuss, “What kind of sauce would you like with your crow?”

Another questioned whether Doctors without Borders was “efficent financially.” I of course vetted that long ago, and the organization is very highly rated (see the Charity Navigator evaluation here). 87% of its expenses go for programs and services. So get your rich friends to bid, for it’s identical to a big donation to DwB, and you get a nice book. I’m truly glad I don’t have Carroll’s trollish commenters on my site.

As for yesterday’s “Guess the Apologist” contest, I guess it wasn’t so hard after all.  The first quote was from Karen Armstrong, the second from Reza Aslan. The links at their names lead you to the places where I found the quotes. I thought the contest would be harder, but I guess the nature and style of these people’s thoughts are pretty distinctive.

Website upgrade and other matters

February 18, 2015 • 10:00 am

If you look to the right of this site’s main page, you’ll see that the links have been revamped, to reflect my new book. (The name of the website will, of course, stay the same.)  The margin now looks like this:

Screen Shot 2015-02-17 at 3.40.00 PM

(Thanks again to Kalliopi Monoyios for doing this update; I’m completely useless at website design.)

A tip: Readers are always worried about emailing me at my work address, but that’s the one I use nearly all the time, and the one you should use to reach me. You can find it at the “Research interests” link that you can see above. That’s also where to send your “readers’ wildlife photos” as well as other links you think I might find interesting. But please be judicious: I get elebenty gazillion emails a day and can’t even answer them all. Also, as I’ve requested before, please limit your emails to me to one per day at the most. Some readers send me multiple contributions, comments, or questions in a single day, and I find that overwhelming.

One other request: please read “Da Roolz“—the guidelines for commenting on this site. They are conveniently located on the left margin of the page, or at the link just given. I am having to deal with a lot of new commenters who haven’t seen these guidelines, and who wade in with a full load of vitriol and insults. Or, they’ll email me and tell me what I should post about.  If you’re new here, please go to the link and acquaint yourself with these Roolz.