“God is a Boob Man”: a nice parody

April 17, 2016 • 2:00 pm

Thanks to several readers for sending me this clip from yesterday’s Saturday Night Live. It’s very clearly a parody of the risible movie “God’s Not Dead 2,” starring Melissa Joan Hart—famed in her previous life as Sabrina the Teenage Witch. To see the model, the trailer of GND2, click here. Even the lettering is the same.

I don’t watch SNL any more, since I cut my teeth on it in the days when it was truly great, with John Belushi, Gilda Radner, Jane Curtin, Dan Akroyd, and Chevy Chase; and I’m always disappointed when I look at its latest incarnation. But there are still some good bits, and this is one.

The disparity of views between critics and the public is clear from the divergent ratings on Rotten Tomatoes (click on the screenshot to see the critics’ take):

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 1.44.12 PM

Dinkoism: India’s Flying Spaghetti Monster

April 13, 2016 • 1:45 pm

I’ve recently learned that India, which as I discovered on a recent visit has far more atheists than I thought, also has its own mock religion along the lines of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. It’s called “Dinkoism,” and is based on elevating a fictional character, Dinkan, to supernatural status. Dinkan happens to be a mouse, and. . . .well, let the video tell you. (Trigger warning: there’s one Hindu anti-Dinkoist.):

Dinkan the mouse messiah bringing salvation to India’s atheists

Here’s the skinny on Dinkan and Dinkoism, taken from Wikipedia (note: somebody go in there and clean up the writing!):

Dinkan was originally published in the Balamangalam childrens’ magazine of Kerala in India. Later Nambolan, another superhero character was introduced to Balamangalam and it too became very popular. From later 1990’s, Balamangalam suffered from high competition from other children’s publications in Malayalam. The magazine still had a strong market share and they expanded out with a kindergarten kids magazine Kalicheppu and a comics book Balamangalam – Chitrakatha. But Dinkan continued to be Balamangalam’s most popular comics series

. . . Dinkan was born in Pankila forest, somewhere in Kerala, India. He was a naughty mouse, who wasn’t disciplined. During one of his escapades, Dinkan was abducted by aliens from an unknown planet. They conducted experiments on him which ended up giving him superior strength, enhanced senses and the ability to fly. Somehow Dinkan found himself back in Pankila forest and he decided to use his powers for the well-being of animals in the forest.

Sounds a bit like the theology of Scientology, no?

. . . Dinkoism has emerged as a parody religion on social networks organized by independent social welfare groups in Kerala, India. This religion celebrates Dinkan as their God in an attempt to bring awareness of the fallacies and practices of traditional religions. Dinkoists sarcastically get offended by any reference questioning the divinity of Dinkan or their ‘Holy Book’ Balamangalam.

Dinkoism is spreading!:

36456_1453096207

More from Wikipedia:

The backstory and professed ideology of Dinkoism has grown organically over the years. Supposed verses are quoted on the fly with fake passages to a non-existing holy book.

Most people found it very attractive since it has nothing to do in day to day life. It is described in its scripture that this faith is strictly restricted to ones home and will be punished after death if brings it into public life out from the home.

Like traditional religions Dinkoists also lay claim to various miracles of Dinkan in the form of writings and signs of Dinkan in food items, cow markings, vegetables and clouds.

. . . Dinkoists believe in ‘The Big Laugh Theory’ according to which the whole universe was created from ‘the Big Laugh’ of Lord Dinkan. Dinkan’s devotees get easily offended if anyone makes fun of their holy book ‘Balamangalam’. Most of the Dinkan devotees are in Trivandrum, Kozhikode and Kochi. Dinkoists of Kozhikode organized a conference at the Sports Council Hall, Mananchira on 20th March, 2016.

In this engrossing video, a Rodential Acolyte explains more about Dinkoism. Do watch it:

 

images

Get yourself a tee-shirt (but only if you’re in India); click on the screenshot to order:

dinkan

Dinkan also has a Twi**er page, but it’s mostly in Malayalam, the language of Kerala.  The Facebook page for the Holy Dinkan Religion, howevr, is in English, and has this recent entry, guaranteed to offend over a billion people:

13001094_1153397421358413_8266789386764012834_n

h/t: Clive

Woman raises cats in a gender neutral way

April 7, 2016 • 12:15 pm

Several readers called this piece to my attention, at last one of whom assumed it was an April Fool’s joke. But I’m pretty sure it’s not, if for no other reason than that it was posted on April 5.

The piece, by Lauren P. Taylor in the Washington Post is called “Don’t laugh: I have a serious reason for raising my cats gender-neutral.” Taylor is identified as “a self-defense instructor and anti-violence educator based in Washington, D.C. She is also a member of the editorial page staff.” The piece goes to show how far virtue signalling has invaded the media.

Taylor’s premise is this: she is not assigning genders to her two female (pardon me!) cats—not calling them “her” or “girls”—as a way of practicing avoiding the dreaded Gender Binary that plagues society. Instead, Taylor uses a term for each cat that some people use for themselves when they feel they’re both male and female, or are unsure: “they” or “them.” For example, if I used that pronoun, I’d describe myself this way: “Jerry is a superannuated professor; they worked for 30 years at the University of Chicago.”

Taylor:

Even though using they, them and their as singular pronouns grates on many people because it’s grammatically incorrect, it seems to be the most popular solution to the question of how to identify people without requiring them to conform to the gender binary of female and male. It also just feels right to refer to people as they wish to be referred to.

Around the house, with just me, Essence and Trouble – named for Rare Essence and Trouble Funk, for the DC music lovers reading this – things were pretty easy. I’d make a mistake (called “misgendering”), saying something like “Where’s your brother?” (Yes, I talk to my cats.)  Usually, I’d remember to fix it (“Where’s your sibling?” or “Where’s your pal?”).  Just as I’d hoped, I began finding it easier to remember to use gender-neutral language for the humans in my life.

Agreed. But this caused some problems with the moggies, especially at the vet’s (she punted, reverting to her “cis-gender privilege”!):

And I began to get an infinitesimal taste of what transgender and gender-nonconforming people face. I’m not talking about the outright bigotry and hatred –something I can’t know without being in their shoes — but the complete cluelessness. Friends would come over, I’d introduce the cats and their pronouns, and some would ask, “But what ARE they?” Some would randomly use “he” and “she.” Some would stumble, unable to form a sentence when talking about one of the cats.

Things got a little more real when Essence got sick. They were really sick.  I took them to the vet and had to weigh the question: Do I explain their pronouns not only to the vet, but also the front-desk workers, the vet techs, and everyone else we interacted with? Before the illness was over, we saw five vets, two sets of front desk people, and countless vet techs. I chose to fall back on my cis-gender privilege (look it up) and used the singular pronoun for Essence. I understood that wouldn’t have been so easy if I were the patient — or if Essence were human.

While all of this was unfolding, friends would ask me: How is your cat? “They’re better” or “The same. The vets don’t know what’s wrong with them,” I’d say. “Wait a minute—are they both sick?” people would reply, confused.

Finally, she emphasizes her rationale:

It is confusing. We’ve had gender drilled into us as part of language since we first heard adults talking when we were infants – decades of “he” and “she.”

But at the same time it’s necessary. People are coming to understand that not all of us fit into the “girl” box or the “boy” box. Those who don’t are claiming space to be who they are. We all need to find ways to acknowledge and respect that. My way of respecting it just happens to be raising my cats gender neutral. You can choose your own.

While I agree that we should use whatever pronoun a person wishes to use for themselves, it is not the case that there is no gender binary among humans. In the vast majority of cases, someone’s biological sex aligns well with their “gender” (i.e., whether they identify as a male or a female). I believe they don’t align in about 3% of people: those who feel they’re of both sexes, who are transgender individuals, or even those who don’t feel human. So if you make a frequency diagram of those whose gender aligns with their sex, you’d get a plot with two huge peaks (“male and female”) and a lot of intermediate points for the others.

This doesn’t mean we shouldn’t respect and sympathize with the plight of those whose psychology doesn’t align with their genitalia or other secondary sexual characteristics. We should. But until these people become more numerous, I’ll avoid asking them “what’s your pronoun?” If they correct me, I’ll respect them, but there’s no need to get huffy about it.

But really—with cats? The most trenchant of the 249 comments under the article is this one:

Screen Shot 2016-04-07 at 11.03.24 AM

I’m starting to realize the real value and psychological aptness of the term “virtue signalling”.

 

 

The Stanford Review manages to offend everybody (well done)

April 1, 2016 • 2:39 pm

by Grania

It’s an April Fool’s joke, but it’s also satirical and rather pointed. It’s guaranteed to offend a lot of people who will claim they are skewering sacred cows; but at least this is pretty good evidence that #NotAllStudents are Special Snowflakes.

Like all good satire, it comes uncomfortably close to being indistinguishable from the real thing, while also being clearly absurd in other places.

 

stanford

 

Give it a read.

Schrödinger’s Jesus and other Easter fun

March 27, 2016 • 2:00 pm

by Grania

Here are some Easter-related bits and pieces from Twitter

A little physics lesson from the tomb showing that religions and science are indeed compatible.

https://twitter.com/TVMirrorDoor/status/714099794977898496

A little quiz to prove the Bible’s inerrancy and consistency.

And one just because of Reasons.

jesus_5825

Hat-tip: Jerry, Matthew

A new perspective of the geopolitical globe

March 25, 2016 • 12:00 pm

by Grania

This explains a lot.

As I’ve said before, I don’t believe that Trump actually holds all the positions that he espouses on the podium. In fact, probably only a few politicians do: elections are all too often reduced to personality contests where the person who managed to say the things the audience most wanted to hear gets to win. The outrageous thing is not that this man says the things he does, or that this appeals to some people – it’s that people believe any of it.