Welcome to a Hump Day (“Gjornade dal gof” in Friulian): April 22, 2026 and, of course, that means it’s Earth Day, now celebrating its 56th birthday—but who remembers? Here is the unofficial Earth Day flag, noted by Wikipedia as created by John McConnell and including The Blue Marble photo taken by the crew of Apollo 17:

There is a Google Doodle for Earth Day; click the screenshot to see where it goes:
It’s also “In God We Trust” Day, marking the day in 1864 when Congress passed an act allowing that religious phrase to appear on U.S. coins. Finally, it’s National Jelly Bean Day, and here are two fun jelly bean facts from Wikipedia:
The “jelly bean rule“ is a rule put forth by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on May 19, 1994.
It says that just because foods are low in fat, cholesterol, and sodium, they cannot claim to be “healthy” unless they contain at least 10 percent of the Daily Value (DV) of: vitamin A, vitamin C, calcium, protein, fiber, or iron. The FDA also made a policy that companies could not fortify foods with the sole intent of making that claim.
and
In United States slang during the 1910s and early 1920s, a “jellybean” or “jelly-bean” was a young man who dressed stylishly but had little else to recommend him, similar to the older terms dandy and fop. F. Scott Fitzgerald published a story, The Jelly-Bean, about such a character in 1920.
The next time conversation lags at a gathering, just ask people what the connection is between F. Scott Fitzgerald and jelly beans. You’ll be the life of the party!
Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the April 26 Wikipedia page.
Da Nooz:
UPDATE: Iran apparently fired on two ships in the Strait of Hormuz.
Two ships came under attack in the Strait of Hormuz as tensions flared in the waterway, after President Trump said the U.S. would extend its cease-fire with Iran and continue its blockade until Tehran presents “a unified proposal.”
An Iranian gunboat fired on a containership northeast of Oman, before a second vessel reported being fired at off the coast of Iran. The two incidents within hours of each other demonstrate that while the aerial war between the U.S. and Iran is on pause, the fight for control of the strait continues.
*Trump has extended the cease-fire with Iran indefinitely as talks have gone nowhere:
President Trump said that the U.S. will extend its cease-fire with Iran and continue the blockade of the country’s ports until its leaders present “a unified proposal.” The move came after Vice President JD Vance paused plans to travel to Pakistan on Tuesday for negotiations with Iran over ending the war, highlighting uncertainty about possible talks. Regional mediators led by Pakistan are racing to try to convince Iran to join the talks, and neither Washington nor Tehran have informed the mediators the talks will be cancelled.
Earlier on Tuesday, U.S. forces boarded an oil tanker in the Indo-Pacific region that was previously sanctioned for working with Iran, the first such move outside the Middle East in connection with the war. Trump, in an interview with CNBC, said he wants to make sure the threat from Iran is ended even if it means the war doesn’t wrap up quickly. “I have all the time in the world,” he said.
“Based on the fact that the Government of Iran is seriously fractured, not unexpectedly so and, upon the request of Field Marshal Asim Munir, and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, of Pakistan, we have been asked to hold our Attack on the Country of Iran until such time as their leaders and representatives can come up with a unified proposal. I have therefore directed our Military to continue the Blockade and, in all other respects, remain ready and able, and will therefore extend the Ceasefire until such time as their proposal is submitted, and discussions are concluded, one way or the other,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.
Trump didn’t set an end date for the new cease-fire extension. A previous two-week cease-fire was due to expire Wednesday evening, he said previously, and had signaled earlier this week that he was unlikely to extend it.
The question is this: who does the extension help more: Iran or America? As gas prices rise and Americans get weary of war, it hurts the U.S. But as Iran loses its main source of income, it’s bad for them. And Trump doesn’t have all the time in the world: he has about 2 years and six months (or six months if you count of Republican losses in the midterms).
*Imagine what would happen if two members of Hamas made their way into Israel and one photographed another smashing the door of a synagogue. They’d be heroes! But when one IDF soldier photographed another smashing the head of a Jesus statue in southern Lebanon, it gave the whole world an excuse to damn Israel (the NYT reported it in detail), even though this is totally atypical behavior for the IDF, reflecting a couple of bad actors. And, sure enough, the two IDF soldiers were jailed:
Two Israeli soldiers have been pulled from combat duty and given 30-day jail sentences after one photographed the other swinging what appeared to be a sledgehammer at the head of a statue of Jesus in southern Lebanon, the Israeli military said on Tuesday.
Other troops who stood by but did nothing to intervene, the military said, have also been summoned and could face disciplinary action.
The military replaced the damaged statue with a gleaming new sculpture of the crucifixion of Christ and released a photo of it.
The extraordinarily swift administration of military justice by Israel was a tacit acknowledgment of the reputational damage the incident had done to the country, more than the seriousness of the crime.
The incident occurred in Debl, a Christian village in Lebanon a few miles from the Israeli border. The village is in an area that the Israeli military seized as a buffer zone before a cease-fire with Hezbollah went into effect late last week.
The photograph surfaced online Sunday, sparking widespread outrage in Israel and beyond, and demands for harsh punishment of the soldiers.
Experts said the act of vandalism reflected both ignorance and a growing hostility to Christians among some Israeli Jews, who see Christianity as a form of idolatry or Christian proselytizing as a threat.
The incident also prompted immediate and profuse apologies from Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and its foreign minister, Gideon Saar.
In a statement Tuesday, Israel’s military expressed its “deep regret” and said that its chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, had condemned the incident as “a moral failure.”
I’m no expert, but this is the first I’ve heard of a fulminating hatred of Christianity among Israeli Jews. At any rate, it shows the very high (and double) standards to which the IDF and Israel are held compared to other countries. One or two rotten apples in the military suddenly tars the whole enterprise. But of course that is the way it has always gone.
*This is a surprise: The U.S. Department of Justice has charged the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) with financial crimes, namely defrauding donors by misusing their money. As you may remember, the SPLC was once a respectable organization uncovering and enforcing civil rights for all groups. But it then fell on hard times, with accusations of misusing funds and selectively leveling charges based on ideology, There were mass layoffs and the leadership quit or was fired. The latest news, however, seems to be a very hard blow (article archived here):
The Justice Department charged the Southern Poverty Law Center, a civil rights group that has long tracked hate groups, on Tuesday with financial crimes, accusing it of defrauding donors by using their money to secretly pay informants inside extremist organizations.
At a news conference announcing the charges, Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general, said that from 2014 to 2023, the group made payments totaling more than $3 million to people who were affiliated with extremist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan and the National Socialist Party of America. The law center, he added, was “doing the exact opposite of what it told its donors it was doing — not dismantling extremism, but funding it.”
The indictment, however, offers little to support the notion that the group’s payments to informants was meant to aid the extremist groups they had infiltrated.
That last paragraph, however, seems less than accurate in light of this:
Prosecutors describe how one informant, which the law center refers to as a field source, “was a member of the online leadership chat group that planned the 2017 ‘Unite the Right’ event in Charlottesville, Virginia, and attended the event at the direction of the S.P.L.C.”
That rally included torch-wielding marchers chanting antisemitic slogans, and violent clashes that culminated with one participant ramming his car into a group of counterprotesters, killing a woman and leaving at least 19 others injured.
The informant “made racist postings under the supervision of the S.P.L.C. and helped coordinate transportation to the event for several attendees,” the charging document said. Between 2015 and 2023, the informant received more than $270,000 from the group, the indictment said.
Is that not helping the organization?
The center faces charges of wire fraud, false statements to a bank, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. No individuals were charged in the indictment, though Mr. Blanche said the investigation was continuing. He accused the group of “manufacturing racism to justify its existence.”
Luana sent a tweet thread with more information, if it can be trusted:
Context: The SPLC spent more than $3 million in donor funds on informants from 2014-2023.
The crux of the DOJ’s case is that the SPLC did so duplicitously in violation of the law. pic.twitter.com/eo7dp35YXC
— Patrick Casey (@restoreorderusa) April 21, 2026
That thread also alleges that the SPLC set up dummy corporations to funnel the money to a series of extremist organizations. I guess this all depends on whether it is considered illegal to use donor money to pay off informants, especially if the dosh somehow furthered the goals of the organizations that the SPLC was infiltrating. We shall see.
*The Free Press describes a new literary genre, “Gazology,” in which, says author Matti Friedman, the whole world is seen through the lens of the war between Israel and Hamas, and to the detriment of Israel. Whole sections of bookstores in the West are devoted to these tomes. Here’s one example:
It’s likely that much Western culture, journalism, and politics in the coming years will be downstream of these books and the ideology behind them. Students in disciplines from anthropology to medicine will be assigned these works and invited to see the world’s problems through the lens of “Gaza.” For this reason, the genre is important. What follows is a survey of five representative samples of the volumes in question, in an attempt to sketch the contours of this expanding body of writing and to understand what it is trying to say.
. . .The memorable cover of the genre’s most popular title, and the first one I read, shows a stylized girl with a bomb about to drop on her head. The author, Omar El Akkad, was born in Egypt and immigrated to Canada, where he reported for The Globe and Mail before moving to the United States. He’s now an American citizen living in Oregon.
In the pages of One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This, El Akkad watches the war in Gaza unfold in portrayals on television and online, describing it as an era-defining evil that people will eventually claim to have opposed, like the crimes of the Nazis or the conquistadors. The war resonates for him as someone living with the displacement of his own migration from the Islamic world as a teen, with a heightened sensitivity to racism, and with the abiding discomfort of a Muslim man living in North America.
The book’s title, particularly the word this, led me to expect an account of the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza, or the war itself, but the strangest aspect of One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This is the author’s slim interest in any of those topics. We follow his travels in Oregon, and in Montreal. He listens to Nirvana. His backyard deck collapses in a way that feels emotionally significant, an episode that gets more space in the book than the entire ideology of Hamas—including the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews in pursuit of the supremacy of Islam—which is never mentioned at all. He writes sentences like “We are all governed by chance. We are all subjects of distance,” and “Fear obscures the necessity of its causing.” His daughter, we learn, “turns seven soon, a hundred in dragon years. She is made of dreaming.” The book won last year’s National Book Award for nonfiction.
El Akkad complains about racism from officials on the U.S.-Canada border, about the hardships of the writer’s life, and about the immoral Israeli investments of people who once gave him a Canadian book prize worth $100,000, which he doesn’t mention giving back. “I’ve sat through a wildly uncomfortable book tour interview once after I joked that I write all my novels in Arabic and then run them through Google Translate, and the interviewer believed me,” he tells us. We’re meant to sneer at this prejudice and sympathize with its victim, but why wouldn’t the interviewer believe him? And why does an author claiming to have discovered the age’s defining evil seem to be concerned primarily with himself? This was confusing at first, but as I read Gazology more deeply, I realized this approach is a characteristic of the genre: In these books, Gaza is not a subject but a stage.
The author gives no indication of ever having set foot in Gaza or in Israel, and when he talks about witnessing events, the recurring phrase is “I watch footage.” Some events are “witnessed” in this fashion—that is, via images that are subject to Hamas censorship and intimidation in Gaza, often curated by Western activists practicing journalism as agitprop, and then supercharged by the various Qatari, Chinese, and Russian information campaigns bending our online algorithms. Other events are not witnessed but ignored to the extent possible, most notably the October 7 massacre that began the war. In what turns out to be another feature of the genre, El Akkad sidesteps the butchery of that day by homing in on one false story promulgated after the attack about Israeli babies who were beheaded or put in an oven. That didn’t happen. But a reader doesn’t learn what did happen: namely, a premeditated mass murder committed by teams of terrorists going house to house through Israeli communities, burning families in their bedrooms, kidnapping toddlers and grandparents, and gunning down more than 350 young people at a music festival. To a reader of this book the motivation behind the attack remains mysterious. Though it was carried out by the Islamic Resistance Movement, known by the Arabic acronym Hamas, the words Islam or Islamic appear in the entire book a total of four times. The word genocide, on the other hand, appears more than 40 times.
There are four more examples, of course. The reason for the popularity of this genre, of course, is because Gazans and Palestinians are seen as The Colonized, people of color who have been victimized by “white adjacent” Jews. It’s the world turned upside down
Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, the Princess demands her due:
Andrzej: What are you doing here?
Hili: Waiting for applause.
In Polish:
Ja: Co tu robisz?
Hili: Czekam na oklaski.
*******************
From CinEmma:
From FB, source unknown:
From Give Me a Sign. Even I am not enough of a curmudgeon to carry around a bunch of these pre-made signs:
From Masih; another political prisoner executed in Iran:
Today, right after the call of “Allahu Akbar” at dawn, the regime in Iran, placed a noose around this young man’s neck and kicked the chair from under his feet, so he would struggle, suffocate, and die.
Yes this is happening in 21st century. They executed him because he went to… pic.twitter.com/4uAcRRVT9L— Masih Alinejad 🏳️ (@AlinejadMasih) April 21, 2026
From Luana, who says that this book was “banished from Amazon for telling a dystopian story of France after immigration in the distant future”. This article gives more information; the book definitely appeals to the Right, but Amazon is not supposed to censor books based on ideology.
In an egregious act of censorship, Amazon has removed @VaubanBooks‘ new edition of The Camp of the Saints, by the prize-winning French novelist Jean Raspail, from its US site. Since I wrote the critical introduction for the new edition, this turns me into a banned writer!
It had… https://t.co/S0t1m2PZa1 pic.twitter.com/yEXRmgkgo0
— Nathan Pinkoski (@NPinkoski) April 20, 2026
From Malcolm: orange cats!
It’s always the orange cats. Love them all. pic.twitter.com/ZAKjpaklV1
— Why you should have a cat (@ShouldHaveCat) March 9, 2026
One from my feed; parrots share the wealth:
Scientists taught parrots the concept of money, and what happened next shocked everyone pic.twitter.com/GV8HEuiq5h
— Science girl (@sciencegirl) April 22, 2026
One I reposted from The Auschwitz Memorial:
This Dutch Jewish girl was gassed to death as soon as she arrived in Auschwitz She was nine years old. https://t.co/t0VSPqs3XR
— Jerry Coyne (@Evolutionistrue) April 22, 2026
And Matthew posts a picture of his cat Harry:
Harry.
— Matthew Cobb (@matthewcobb.bsky.social) 2026-04-21T10:45:53.374Z



































































