Readers’ wildlife photographs

October 29, 2015 • 7:30 am

Reader Ed Kroc shows us The Life of Pigeons. I’ve always maintained that we don’t recognize the beauty of these birds only because they’re so common, and because they befoul our cities.

Attached are some photos of probably the most universally recognized example of urban wildlife: pigeons! Not just any pigeons though, these are common Rock Pigeons (Columba livia) that raised a couple of chicks on my balcony this past summer.

Actually, these are the third pair of pigeons that attempted to nest on my balcony this summer. The first couple, staking out their claim in May, seemed rather clueless, laying two eggs in the middle of the balcony, not even next to each other. They rolled around in the breeze and were abandoned after a couple days. Then a different pair arrived in June and built an impressive nest of twigs between two of my flower pots. They laid a single egg, but the very next day a crow spotted them and snatched the egg for lunch. These two then abandoned the site too.

Next came a solitary pigeon. I dubbed him “bachelor pigeon,” as he would sleep alone every night underneath one of the chairs on my balcony. He held this routine for about three weeks before a third pair of pigeons showed up and summarily evicted him from his roost. He tried to reassert his claim for a few days, but was forced to concede after several extended beak-clamping and wrestling matches! This third pair cleverly avoided building a nest by commandeering one of my flower pots that was only half full of foliage. The first attached photo shows one of them in the pot incubating the pair of eggs they laid in mid-July.

1-on the nest

After a little more than 2 weeks (a very short incubation period, at least compared to the gulls I usually watch!), the chicks hatched one day apart from each other. They are strange looking things, half-naked, with bills and eye “patches” that are almost adult-sized, but tiny bodies no bigger than their eggs. You can see in the second photo, taken at one-day and less-than-one-day old, that their eyes are not yet open.

2-Hatchlings
One of the parents is seen with the chicks at 3 and 4 days old in the third photo. The membrane that seemed to be covering their eyes upon hatching had just dissolved away, and you can see their pronounced ear-openings.

3-family portrait

The fourth photo shows one of the chicks being fed. It always looked like the parents’ exerted considerable effort when feeding, forcibly arching and heaving their bodies forward to expel the crop milk into the chicks’ open mouths4-feeding
Photo 5 shows the chicks at 6 and 7 days of age, already nearly tripled in size.

5-growing up

The next portrait, taken five days later, shows how the chicks were slowly morphing into something that vaguely resembled an honest rock pigeon. Their newly sprouting feathers gave them a porcupine appearance at this age, with most of their yellow baby-fluff still sticking out in between. Notice too the conspicuous earhole.

6-portrait

Photo 7 shows the chicks at about two and a half weeks old, with most of their outer wing feather grown in. I like this photo because I can see their different personalities in it: the one in the back was suspicious and hostile, rearing up on his/her legs and snapping in my direction whenever I would step out onto the balcony. The one in front never minded me at all.

7-big babies

At almost 4 weeks, the chicks finally jumped out of the flower pot for the very first time. The eighth photo was taken right after the first chick leapt out. I had to leave town for the weekend right after this picture was taken, and when I returned home three days later, the chicks were gone, fledged off the balcony (21 storeys up!) and dispersed out into the city below. They left a horrendous mess for me to clean up, and the tortured remains of a once healthy plant (also pictured in the last photo). Still, it was nice to provide a home for new life!

8-ready to fledge

Thursday: Hili dialogue

October 29, 2015 • 4:56 am

Weather for Chicago, cloudy with a chance of rain, high of only 51°F (11°C). I can hear the wind howling outside as I lie abed, but soon I must venture out in it. The sun will not be back until Sunday. In Britain, a couple has put together a “safety video”, like the airlines, telling visitors to their home how to deal with their cats Cole and Marmalade. Be sure to watch it. Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is espousing some rare empathy, and you will be heartened (if you like d*gs) to see their friendship:

Hili: Isn’t love better than hate and fear?
Cyrus: Absolutely.

P1030525

In Polish:
Hili: Czy nie lepsza jest miłość od nienawiści i lęku?
Cyrus: Zdecydowanie.

Wil Wheaton rebuffs the odious and stingy HuffPo

October 28, 2015 • 2:00 pm

Wil Wheaton, who became famous for his teen-star appearance on Star Trek, and who now appears regularly on The Big Bang Theory (a show I’ve never watched), was asked by PuffHo if they could re-post one of Wheaton’s own website posts, “Seven things I did to reboot my life.” Here they are, if you’re interested:

  • Drink less beer.
  • Read more (and Reddit does not count as reading).
  • Write more.
  • Watch more movies.
  • Get better sleep.
  • Eat better food.
  • Exercise more.

That’s good grist for PuffHo’s “life improvement” mill, so it’s no surprise that they wanted it, especially because Wheaton’s so well known.

What then happened to Wheaton is exactly what happened to me: PuffHo asked if they could re-publish one of my website posts, and I asked them, “What are you paying?” And their response—the same one they gave to Wheaton—is that they don’t pay but they can give you valuable exposure. Thus the title of Wheaton’s post describing his run-in with Arianna’s site, “You can’t pay your rent with ‘the unique platform and reach our site provides‘.”

His account of his interactions with the Odious Site, and one of his tw**ts:

A very nice editor at Huffington Post contacted me yesterday, and asked me if I would be willing to grant permission for the site to republish my post about the seven things I did to reboot my life.

Huffington Post has a lot of views, and reaches a pretty big audience, and that post is something I’d love to share with more people, so I told the editor that I was intrigued, and asked what they pay contributors.

Well, it turns out that, “Unfortunately, we’re unable to financially compensate our bloggers at this time. Most bloggers find value in the unique platform and reach our site provides, but we completely understand if that makes blogging with us impossible.”

I translated this on Twitter thusly:

Screen Shot 2015-10-28 at 1.23.43 PM

Although Wheaton isn’t sure he “made the right call,” I think he did. As the Wall Street Journal points out, HuffPo may be worth a billion dollars, and is projected to bring in $168 million in revenue this year. (While it has yet to turn an operating profit, HuffPo says that’s because it’s plowing the revenues into growth.) But what this journalistic octopus is doing is completely devaluing professional writing. Hopeful writers will write for free, counting on getting the exposure on PuffHo needed to turn their avocation into a profitable career.

That usually doesn’t happen, and so we see a bunch of young writers giving PuffHo the means to earn its millions, and all they get is unproductive exposure. But exposure, as Wheaton says, won’t pay the rent. This is what’s killing serious journalism all over the U.S., and driving down the wages of those who do earn money.

I won’t write for HuffPo until they pay for my words, and neither will Wil. Yes, I write here for free (it cost me money to keep the site up), and I get no revenue from ads. That’s because I write for my own amusement, and to expel my thoughts into the ether. But if other people want to make money from those thoughts, they’ll have to pay me.

Blogger Raif Badawi reportedly scheduled for second flogging

October 28, 2015 • 12:48 pm

Most of us have heard of Raif Badawi, one of the most prominent victims of Islamic blasphemy laws. Badawi, 31, was convicted by a Saudi court in 2013 of apostasy (he was supposedly insulting Islam on his website), and was later sentenced to 10 years in prison and 1000 lashes, to be doled out in 20 sessions of 50 lashes each. This is no light punishment, for a lashing is a severe beating that can severely injure or even kill a prisoner.

In January of this year, he was given his first flogging, publicly, in a mosque in Jeddah. Badawi was severely injured, and further floggings were postponed because his medical condition—diabetes and hypertension—might kill him if he were whipped again.

Now the soft-hearted Saudi government is set to resume this inhuman punishment, at least according to Badawi’s wife, who lives in Canada with their children. CNN reports:

In a statement published on the Raif Badawi Foundation website Tuesday, [Ensaf] Haidar said that an “informed source” told her that Saudi authorities had approved resuming the floggings.

“The informed source also said that the flogging will resume soon but will be administered inside the prison,” Haidar said. The sentence originally called for the floggings to be carried out in public.

“It is worth mentioning that the same source had warned me of Raif’s pending flogging at the beginning of January 2015 and his warning was confirmed, as Raif was flogged on 9th January,” she said.

Haidar, who has been granted political asylum in Canada along with the couple’s three children, urged the Saudi King to show mercy.

The new Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has joined Haidar in requesting Badawi’s release:

Sadly, Obama has refused to condemn this inhumane punishment, ducking the question when asked about Badawi. It’s a blot on the U.S. that we can’t even bring ourselves to criticize such barbarity by our “allies.”

I’m still hopeful that this torture can be stopped, for not only is it cruel and unusual punishment, but it’s been imposed solely because the Saudi theocracy doesn’t like what Badawi said. Remember, too, that this crime and its punishment would not exist without religion, for the very meaning of apostasy depends on the hegemony of Islam. This one can’t be pinned on the West, or on colonialism.

Let’s hope that three children don’t go fatherless much longer, and that Badawi can find asylum in Canada.

This is supposedly a photo of Badawi being flogged, but I can’t verify that it’s him. But it doesn’t matter, for it can stand for the Saudi’s barbaric form of justice, which normally mandates death for apostasy.

flogged

Ghost hunting in Norway: Have other superstitions replaced religion in Scandinavia?

October 28, 2015 • 11:15 am

“Reader Mark” sent me a link to an article from Saturday’s New York Times, “Norway has a new passion: ghost hunting,” with a somewhat challenging line in his email:

You might want to think twice before ever again holding up those ‘Scandinavian countries’ as role models of rationality.

Now I don’t know whether to construe that as a lighthearted comment or a rather snarky one, for the Times article doesn’t much affect my opinion that Scandinavian countries as more rationally run than, say, the U.S. First of all, the article is about only one country, Norway. And what it says is that belief in ghosts, spirits, and woo is increasing:

Ghosts, or at least belief in them, have been around for centuries but they have now found a particularly strong following in highly secular modern countries like Norway, places that are otherwise in the vanguard of what was once seen as Europe’s inexorable, science-led march away from superstition and religion.

Sadly, there are no survey data supporting that claim, just anecdotes like the popularity of a Norwegian television show called “The Power of Spirits”. Here are all the “data” that the article gives:

While churches here may be largely empty and belief in God, according to opinion polls, in steady decline, belief in, or at least fascination with, ghosts and spirits is surging.

And, of course, ministers rush in to argue that this belief in ghosts is a sign that atheists must replace abjured religion with some kind of woo, with the implication that Ghost Woo is worse than Holy Ghost Woo:

“God is out but spirits and ghosts are filling the vacuum,” said Roar Fotland, a Methodist preacher and assistant professor at the Norwegian School of Theology in Oslo. Instead of slowly eliminating religion, as Sigmund Freud, Karl Marx and other theorists predicted, modernity has only channeled religious feelings in unexpected ways, Mr. Fotland said.

“Belief in God, or at least a Christian God, is decreasing but belief in spirits is increasing,” he added, describing this as part of a general resurgence of “premodern religion.”

And that, of course, is the point of “reader Mark,” who claims that I’m no longer entitled to argue that Scandinavia is more rational than the U.S., even though the article’s about Norway and the head of the nation’s Humanist Organization says that this is all tripe—that religion’s still dying out.

Well, first of all, how pervasive is Norway’s belief in ghosts compared to, say, the hyper-religious U.S.? We don’t know. What we do know is that many Americans believe in ghosts and woo. A 2005 Gallup poll shows that 32% of Americans believe in ghosts, while 19% are unsure, while 37% believe in haunted houses. If the article’s thesis is right, that should be lower than similar beliefs of Norwegians. A HuffPo/YouGov poll from just two years ago showed that 45% of Americans believe in ghosts or the notion that the spirits of the dead can return to stalk the Earth. A Pew Research poll, also taken in 2013, shows that 29% of Americans feel they’ve been in touch with the dead, and 18% that they’ve seen a ghost. How does that compare with Norway, much less with Scandinavia? I have no idea, and neither does Reader Mark.

Before we can claim that belief in ghosts has replaced the decline in religion in Scandinavia, we need to have surveys of such beliefs when religion was more pervasive in Scandinavia, and compare that data to beliefs now. Until we have those data, we can’t credibly claim that as religion wanes, the vacuum is filled with woo.

But of course it’s entirely possible that there’s been an uptick in woo. I don’t doubt for a moment that some people have a need for “spiritual” stuff, and if they give up their faith, or as society becomes less religious, love of woo may rise. But I do doubt that it would increase tremendously, which would have to be the case since the proportion of atheists in Norway is estimated by Phil Zuckerman as between 31% and 72% (see p. 56 of link). So I’ll simply ask Scandinavian readers (those from Norway in particular) to weigh in with their own beliefs and experiences, for that is all the Times article gives.

Finally, belief in ghosts isn’t near as inimical to human welfare as is belief in God and His moral strictures. I think American society, not to mention many Muslim lands, would be greatly improved if they’d give up Allah for Caspar. After all, we know that religiosity is negatively correlated with societal welfare across many lands (and in states within the U.S.), and as well-being wanes from year to year, religiosity increases a step behind. So yes, even granting the dubious premise that Scandinavia is ridden with ghostophiles, it’s still an area that is more empathic and run far more rationally than is the U.S.

Note to readers (again): fill in your blanks

October 28, 2015 • 10:10 am

Most people have already become aware of a WordPress glitch that has removed the autofill feature of comments, so if you make a comment, please be sure that your name and email address is filled in before you post it. I’m still getting way too many comments from “Anonymous”.  I am in touch with WordPress and they are aware of the problem.
Thanks.
—Management

Oh, and read the post on ravens just below. That’s an order.