The schlockiest songs of all time?

May 27, 2014 • 9:49 am

I’m still thin on the ground and can’t brain: I’m revising the last chapter of my book, teaching all afternoon, and have precious little time left for posting. Mea culpa.  Fortunately, readers still send me items, some of which are worth mentioning.

One, from reader Barry, is this deeply misguided list from Vulture of the “150 Greatest Schlock Songs Ever.”  The problem is that the compiler, Jody Rosen, doesn’t define “schlock,” so the list winds up being simply weird, with #1 and #2 being “Over the Rainbow” and “Purple Haze,” respectively. “Over the Rainbow” is a great song, and if it’s schlock, well then any song about love, or longing, is also schlock. “Purple Haze” is not a schlock song by anyone’s lights: it’s a very good psychedelic song, meant (I think) to mimic an acid experience.

I know a bit of Yiddish, and my conception of “schlock” meets that of the Merriam Webster Online Dictionary’s: “of low quality or value.” Those songs (and many on Rosen’s list) don’t fit that.

You can read the rest, but I have my own list; I’ve had it for years, and besides many sub-lists of great music (“soul”, “country”, etc.,) it includes a list of bad schlock songs, and there’s no quarreling with it:

Ballad of the Green Berets; Sgt. Barry Sadler

An Open Letter to My Teenage Son; Victor Lundberg

Spill the Wine (Dig that Girl); Eric Burdon

I Got a Brand New Pair of Rollerskates; Melanie

I’ve Never Been to Me; Charlene

Octopus’ Garden; The Beatles

Macarthur Park; Richard Harris

Old Rivers; Walter Brennan

Take the Money and Run; Steve Miller

Muskrat Love; The Captain and Tenille

The Name Game; Shirley Ellis

Drops of Jupter; Train

Needless to say, feel free to add your own. You can either go by Rosen’s guidelines, which I guess include “good but sappy songs”, or mine (truly dreadful songs).

 

 

Google Doodle honors Rachel Carson

May 27, 2014 • 7:25 am

If you go to the Google home page today, you’ll see this:

Screen shot 2014-05-27 at 7.55.18 AM

 

It celebrates Rachel Carson’s 107th birthday (she died, way too young, in 1964).

I know you’ve heard of her, for she was the twentieth century’s most notable environmentalist, and her 1963 bestseller, Silent Spring, undoubtedly the most important environmental work of our time. (If you want to learn more, today’s Washington Post has a nice retrospective.) That book —I still remember when it was published—called everyone’s attention to the dangers of pesticides, and, by so doing, launched the environmentalism of the 1960s that continues today.  She was also, of course, a marine biologist, having preceded Silent Spring with two bestsellers on ocean life.

Breast cancer took her at 56, but she’s one of those people for whom the words “she’s still with us” are more than a consoling bromide.

url

 

Right-wing politician gives an expensive dino skeleton (proving Noah’s Flood) to the Creation Museum

May 27, 2014 • 5:48 am

Talk to Action, a site that reports on the religious right, has a doozy with a few twists.  The title is a bit confusing: “RINO says his dino proves Noah’s Flood. Wha wha WHAT? UPDATED!

Well, the RINO (Republican In Name Only) is Michael Peroutka, an extreme right-winger who is so far to the right that he disguises his real political affiliation (the confederacy of dunces called The Constitution Party) by trying to run as a Republican for a minor political office in Maryland.  In reality, he’s a pro-Confederate secessionist who proudly sports the Confederate flag on his garb:

Clarkson and I have previously reported that Peroutka and Whitney [David Whitney, Perutka’s preacher and political ally] are leaders of the League of the South, a Neo-Confederate group which the Southern Poverty Law Center describes as a hate group. Whitney serves as the chaplain of the Maryland chapter of the League. As the lead instructor of Peroutka’s Institute on the Constitution, he teaches “the God-given right to secede.”

Peroutka has spoken at League of the South conventions for years, was elected to its board of directors in 2013, and on at least one such occasion sported a polo with a Confederate battle flag.

 photo MichaelPeroutkawearingDixieflagshirt-cropped.jpg

Below is a video of Peroutka from three years ago, arguing that “evolutionary thinking is dangerous—and anti-Amerian,” as well as “What I’m saying is that the promotion of evolution is an act of disloyalty to America… What I’m saying is there’s no way you can promote or believe in evolution and sing `God Bless America’ during the 7th inning stretch!” Note that he declares with confidence that the creator God is not Allah or any of the Hindu deities. Sounds like Eric Hedin, no? No Hindu monkey god could do that!

Now it’s Peroutka’s creationism that has led to this latest shenanigan, and the part that interests me (I can’t do squat about his political luncacy):

Peroutka’s family foundation — the Elizabeth Streb Peroutka Foundation (named in honor of his mother) — purchased an allosaurus skeleton for $200,000 in 2004 and spent a decade carefully restoring it. Creation Museum proprietor Ken Ham seems to think that the acquisition of the dinosaur fossil lends his endeavor credibility.

“For decades I’ve walked through many leading secular museums, like the Smithsonian in Washington, and have seen their impressive dinosaur skeletons, but they were used for evolution,” Ham told the Associated Press. “Now we have one of that class for our museum.”

. . . A museum geologist claims that the well-preserved state of the 30-foot-long, bipedal predator shows that it apparently died in a sudden immersion. He hastily concludes that if the dinosaur died quickly by immersion, then this must corroborate the Biblical story of Noah’s flood. He admits no other possibilities for a dinosaur’s sudden drowning.

In case you’ve forgotten what an Allosaurus is, it’s a large carnivorous theropod dinosaur, which looks similar to T. rex. Here’s an Allosaurus fragilis skeleton. The one Peroutka gave to the creation Museum, which supposedly proves the Flood, is apparently worth about $200,000:

A. fragilis (from Wikipedia)
A. fragilis (from Wikipedia)

Now most animal fossils are formed after immersion of a carcass in water and its burial in sediments, so I’m curious how the Creation Museum’s “geologist” could show that this one died by sudden immersion (read: Noah’s flood). How can you distinguish that from the thing dying in water that wasn’t the Flood, and then being fossilized. Real geologists in Kentucky, of course, haven’t fallen for it:

“The Creation Museum has asserted the specimen to be evidence of Noah’s flood without any actual research,” said Dan Phelps, president of the Kentucky Paleontological Society, in an email to the AP.

“Real vertebrate paleontologists study the surrounding sediments and the geological context of their finds,” he added. “Of course since the Creation Museum doesn’t do scientific research, all (it) really has done is obtain a nice display trophy.”

So here’s a challenge to Ken Ham, the Creation Museum, and the “geologist” who proved that this skeleton was from an animal who died in Noah’s Flood. Since you claim scientific evidence for the Flood, including items like this skeleton, please make available for scrutiny the results of your geologist’s inspection of the Allosaurus skeleton, including the data showing that there is no possibility for the creature’s death save “sudden immersion while alive.” In fact, perhaps I’ll write Dr. Phelps and urge him to make this inquiry.

Any real scientist who studies something like this is honor-bound to make his data available to other scientists. I’m absolutely positive, of course, that this creationists “geologist” won’t do it, but I’d like to see his/her excuse. Without any evidence and documentation, the claim that this thing died in Noah’s Flood is worthless. Moreover, there should be some dates associated with the fossil, showing that it’s less than 10,000 years old, and certainly not 150 million years old thought by non-loony geologists to be the time when this creature lived.

Mr. Ham, show us those data!

h/t: Terry

Deeper than the Holler

May 27, 2014 • 4:48 am

We’re lucky to be living in the exact era when we can hear, live, the greatest male voice that country music has ever produced. I’m referring, of course, to Randy Travis (b. 1959). He’s not the best male country musician who ever lived, for he doesn’t write many of the songs he sings, and he’s at best a creditable guitar player. (If I were to choose better overall country musicians, they’d include Hank Williams, Doc Watson, Johnny Cash, Earl Scruggs, Patsy Cline, Bill Monroe, and the like).

But oh, The Voice! A deep, rich baritone: it’s what bourbon would sound like if it could sing. I don’t know of any male country singer who can match it.

Here’s one of his best songs. “Deeper than the holler” went to #1 on the country charts, but should have been a crossover hit as well. Written by Paul Overstreet and Don Schlitz, it’s performed live here with another well-known singer, Josh Turner. (I couldn’t find a good live rendition by Travis alone; you can find hear original recorded version here.)

Travis has had a rough life, largely of his own making. I thought he’d cleaned up, but in the last few years he’s been arrested a few times and has engaged in weird behavior (e.g., walking into a convenience store naked to buy cigarettes).  In this performance he’s already past his vocal prime, but The Voice is still there. And the song is beautiful:

Tuesday: Hili dialogue

May 27, 2014 • 3:15 am

The standoff continues. . .

Hili: Where is the black monster?
A: Hili, this is our Cyrus, he likes you very much.
Hili: In English the one who likes somebody so very much is called a stalker.
10402762_10203448754486852_1580694629911163848_n
In Polish:
Hili: Gdzie jest to czarne straszydło?
Ja: Hili, to jest nasz Cyrus, on cię bardzo lubi. 
Hili: Po angielsku takiego co tak bardzo lubi nazywa się stalker.

Please, O Ceiling Cat

May 26, 2014 • 5:17 pm

Is it too much to ask that I could have a few minutes with the cubs, too?

Five white tiger cubs recently born in a zoo in Austria, were shown to the public on Monday. Zoo owner Herbert Eder says it is rare for a tiger to bear so many cubs in one litter, and if they do, the offspring do not often survive. (May 26)

Die Tiere auf Deutsch

May 26, 2014 • 12:32 pm

This was highlighted in a tw**t from Tamsin Edwards, via Matthew Cobb. It’s accurate, as far as I know.

BobhONdCUAAW6Xo

I love “Meerschweinchen” (“little ocean pig”) as the name for guinea pig. Where did that come from? And “Lazy animal” for “sloth” is great.

Which reminds me of a story: A city girl was visiting a farm for the first time, and, given a tour, saw a group of pigs around their trough, noisily slurping their slop.  “Ewww!”, she said. “No wonder they call them pigs!”