Syracuse decides to allow screening of film on Israeli settlers

September 3, 2016 • 12:30 pm

The other day I noted that M. Gail Hammer, a professor of religion at Syracuse, canceled the screening of a film on Israeli settlers because of her fear that it would incite the BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) students on campus. The director of the film “The Settlers“, Simon Dotan, had been invited by a professor at Nebraska who was co-organizing a Syracuse conference on religion and film, but Hammer nixed that invite. The ironic thing was the BDS would have supported the showing, for the film apparently portrayed Israeli settlers in a negative light.

This was unique, as far as I know, because it was a disinvitation based not on any tangible dissent or opposition, but merely the fear of dissent—and a misguided fear to boot. Hammer’s behavior was reprehensible.

Fortunately, people can back down, as both Hammer and Syracuse have now done. As Syracuse.com reports, Hammer has apologized and the University of Syracuse will be showing the film after all. The Atlantic article by Conor Friedersdorf publicizing Hammer’s actions no doubt contributed to the publicity that led to this reversal:

Michele Wheatly, vice chancellor and provost at SU, emailed the campus community Friday morning to say that Hamner’s decision was not consistent with university policies. She said the university would be reaching out to the filmmaker to arrange a screening on campus.

Hamner also issued a formal apology, saying her reluctance stemmed from a fear of controversy and inexperience planning conferences.

. . . SU’s provost, Wheatly, responded to the controversy this morning [Sept. 2].

“I feel it necessary to reaffirm our commitment to intellectual and respectful debate on controversial issues,” she said in an email to the campus community.

Wheatly pointed to a letter from her predecessor, from 2014. Interim Chancellor and Provost Eric Spina said at the time that SU does not support the boycott of Israeli academic institutions, but welcomed discussion, debate and dialogue on campus concerning issues of peace and security in the Middle East.

Wheatly said she was working with Chancellor Kent Syverud and the College of Arts and Sciences to invite Dotan to screen the film on campus. No plans for the screening have been confirmed at this time.

Hammer issued her own statement through the University News Office:

Screen Shot 2016-09-03 at 12.09.49 PM

Well, I’ll take that; she certainly uses the right words, and it’s not a “notapology.” What is interesting is her mentioning the “media coverage” that ultimately came from the Atlantic piece. This is a lesson for us: if you see an egregious example of censorship or suppressionof speech, call it to the attention of the media, preferably Big Media like The Atlantic.

 

h/t: Greg Mayer

The masses comment on the Wolfe review

September 3, 2016 • 11:00 am

Nick Cohen’s advice to authors includes this gem: “Never read the comments.” And I nearly always follow that dictum, except for the comments on this site.  I also made an exception for my review of Tom Wolfe’s book in the Washington Post. I wanted to see how people reacted to my defense of evolution, realizing that 40% of Americans are pure young-earth creationists and another 31% theistic evolutionists.

And the Post comments demonstrated that amply—and heartbreakingly. Evolution is so well established as a scientific “fact,” and there are mountains of evidence supporting it! Yet resistance to it is everywhere. Further, the ideas of modern evolutionary theory are not hard to understand. Despite that, people either don’t understand it, make no effort to, or simply parrot arguments they took from creationists and IDers. So much ignorance, and so little time! The comments about evolution that amused me the most were the constant assertions that we don’t know anything about speciation—even though Allen Orr and I wrote a big technical book on that subject (Speciation; Sinauer 2004) showing that we understand quite a lot about the process.

I’m omitting nice comments about me as well as good comments defending evolution (I noticed some readers here making them), and present the ones showing both an ignorance of evolution and a hatred of Professor Ceiling Cat. I’ll just display the ignorant comments and a few of the nasty ones.

IGNORANT COMMENTS:

Whoever Ajax Martin is, he’s all over the comments parading his anti-evolutionism (people have responded to him, and you can see the pushback at the site. I’ll leave it to the readers to rebut, at least mentally, this first one.

Screen Shot 2016-09-02 at 3.42.01 PM

This one shows a profound ignorance of how we establish that something in the past as provisionally true:

Screen Shot 2016-09-02 at 3.42.52 PM

Here we see the same misconception as demonstrated above. Seriously, “nothing historical is factual?” Didn’t JFK get assassinated in 1963? Is that story telling? Didn’t the World Trade Centers topple after being hit by a plane? Fairy tale (well, to some denialists)?

Screen Shot 2016-09-03 at 9.13.23 AM

This guy dominic has nothing by way of evidence, so he just attacks Darwin because he’s “the secularists’s God”:
Screen Shot 2016-09-03 at 10.05.41 AM

Nobody ever said all of evolution can be completely explained by natural selection, for there are processes like genetic drift, that probably have a profound effect on the evolution of DNA sequences. And no, you can’t ignore evolution in the “causal mechanisms” in genetics, because the behavior and assortment of genes and chromosomes evolved by natural selection. Why are there complex DNA-repair mechanisms? Why do we have the complex process of meiosis involved in sex? Why are paternal and material chromosomes differentially imprinted? These are evolutionary questions, but Callicles can’t be arsed to think.

Screen Shot 2016-09-03 at 10.11.12 AM

Ahhh. . . here’s the old ID trope: if we don’t yet have a fully-worked out understanding or scenario of how a complex molecule evolved, evolution couldn’t have done it. It’s the prime fallacy of Intelligent Design, and I think it should have a name. Oh, right—the God of the Gaps fallacy.

Screen Shot 2016-09-03 at 10.15.17 AM

The person below needs to read Why Evolution is True. I am baffled how people can disregard the evidence as “theot581 does”, and claim that it’s “mountains of cow dung.” Does he think that all biologists, including religious ones like Francis Collins and Ken Miller are idiots who have been bamboozled into accepting cow dung? And this person, like many others in the thread, tries to draw a phony distinction between “microevolution” and “macroevolution.” There’s no hard and fast line there, and, of course, there’s plenty of evidence for extreme macroevolution, both in the fossil record (Tiktaalik, mammal-like reptiles, the progression of forms from artiodactyls to whales) and in the vestigial features that show common ancestry between, say, humans and fish, or humans and reptiles.
Screen Shot 2016-09-03 at 10.16.15 AM

Here are just three NASTY COMMENTS.  (There are more; I can haz Patreon now?) I wanted to find the best one, in which an irate reader called me a “child-man who uses the word ‘noms’ on his blog and posts about cowboy boots and cats”, but it eluded me. (If you find it, screenshot it and send it to me.)

These don’t bother me a bit: when people resort to name-calling, they got nothing. It just demonstrates their ignorance and incivility.


Screen Shot 2016-09-02 at 9.27.18 AM
Screen Shot 2016-09-03 at 9.10.41 AM

And I’ll add one FUNNY COMMENT—not about me but about Tom Wolfe. Do you get it?Funny

Dave Rubin: what is the alt-right?

September 3, 2016 • 10:00 am

I was going to refer you in this post to a 52-minute conversation that Dave Rubin had with Roseanne Barr, but it was so painful to listen to (Barr was all over the place and at times sounded almost insane) that I can’t recommend it at all. Listen at your own peril.

However, Rubin by himself is fine. If you’ve been baffled by the new term “alt-right,” as I have, here’s Rubin discussing it in an 8-minute video.

Short take:  The alt-right is a diverse group of powerless “keyboard warriors and professional trolls vying for attention for people in power.” The key is the use of the Internet to amplify one’s views. Rubin claims that it’s generally associated with fascists, anti-Semites, racists, neo-Nazis, or extreme conservatives, which he despises, but of course he’s a free-speech advocate and doesn’t feel they should be censored. And he thinks the group, such as it is, is a mixture of serious wackos and those who simply want to get attention.

Rubin adds that he sees the Regressive Left as far more of a societal danger than the alt-right, and the former, he claims, gave rise to the latter. I’m not sure to what extent Trumpism and alt-rightism is truly a reaction to Regressive Leftism, for I think most of the chowderheads who support Trump don’t follow the shenanigans of regressive leftists. How many Trump supporters or neo-Nazis, for instance, even know about Brandeis’s withdrawal of an honorary degree for Ayaan Hirsi Ali, or about the Great Halloween Costume Fracas at Yale?

At any rate, Rubin names only one alt-rightist, and that’s Scott Adams, creator of the Dilbert comic strip and apparently a fan of Trump. He’s had a conversation with Adams, which you can hear here (I haven’t yet listened).

I’m scheduled to do a show with Rubin in January, and I’m excited.

Caturday felid trifecta: Beatrix Potter’s lost cat book, pack of farm cats yowl for kibble, and giant felt cat heads

September 3, 2016 • 9:00 am

According to Minnesota Public Radio, the beloved Beatrix Potter started writing a gender-bending book about a cat—but the book was never completed (it’s now been finished and illustrated by others):

Here’s the backstory to this “new” Beatrix Potter book: Two years ago, a woman named Jo Hanks who’s an editor at Penguin Random House in the United Kingdom came upon a reference to a letter that Potter wrote in 1914. In that letter, Potter mentioned working on the manuscript of a story about “a well-behaved prime black Kitty cat who leads a rather double life.”

Hanks dug into Potter’s archives at The Victoria & Albert Museum and she found the manuscript of The Tale of Kitty-in-Boots. Potter had written three drafts of the story and had done one watercolor illustration of Kitty, but for various reasons, she died in 1943 without completing the book.

Skip to the present and this lavish debut edition of The Tale of Kitty-in-Boots.

What is it with cats and boots? (Not that I mind!) Here’s that one illustration, and they even look like cowboy boots:

Beatrix Potter wrote three drafts of The Tale of Kitty-in-Boots and did one watercolor illustration (above). But the book was left incomplete when she died in 1943, and it is now being published posthumously, with illustrations by Quentin Blake.

Kitty is apparently genderfluid, which will appeal to younger Snowflakes-to-Be:

[The] ominous tone is set in the very first story when Peter Rabbit’s mother gives him and his sisters — Flopsy, Mopsy and Cotton-tail — a warning: “Now, my dears,” said old Mrs. Rabbit one morning, “you may go into the fields or down the lane, but don’t go into Mr. McGregor’s garden: your Father had an accident there; he was put in a pie by Mrs. McGregor.” In its own quaint way, Potter’s landscape is every bit as Gothic as the Brontes’.

And, sometimes, as in The Tale of Kitty-in-Boots, Potter’s stories are nearly as surreal as Lewis Carroll’s. The “Kitty” in question here calls herself “Miss Catherine St. Quintin,” and she does, indeed, lead a double life. By day she’s the docile pet of a kind old lady; by night she’s a poacher who prowls the countryside armed with an air-gun and dressed in “a gentleman’s Norfolk jacket, and little fur-lined boots.”

Kitty is such a convincing gender nonconformist that she’s mistaken for “a sportsman” by Mrs. Tiggy-Winkle, the hedge-hog from an earlier tale. Other recognizable furry faces include fellow feline Tabitha Twitchit, Mr. Tod the creepy fox and a much older Peter Rabbit, described as “stout” and “very fat.” Rest assured, this is the closest we come here to that dread Atticus Finch moment in which a beloved character is changed for the worse.

The book will be released in three days, and you can order it on Amazon, where it’s already #1 in Children’s Classics.

*********

HiHomer tells us about a gang of farm cats (they look to be in very good shape) owned by Corey Karmann of Nebraska. Here’s a video of the herd showing up at feeding time. Listen to those yowls! The owner, who goes by the name karmanno, promised on YouTube to reply to the many critical comments (you can just imagine what was said!), but I haven’t yet seen his reply.

*********

Finally, I’ve written before about Giant Felt Cat Heads, which can scare the bejeezus out of anyone; but there’s a new report, with new pictures, at cattime.com (see also RocketNews24). 

What better way to turn heads on the street than with a head? That’s the philosophy behind these awesome new cat masks designed by Japanese wool artist Housetsu Sato, who uses wool felt to make natural-looking cats heads that fit perfectly atop a human body. The artist has been perfecting the cat head design since April 2015, after he made a two-metre tall beckoning cat for a school festival that became incredibly popular. Sato found that the cat head on its own was a hit with students, who looked like hybrid feline-human beasts when they put it on.

. . . The heads are made of wool and look incredibly realistic if you don’t consider how big they are, and the eyes look like they’re following you wherever you go. All the heads are individually handmade, and the short-haired cat heads can be completed within a month. You can even get a head of your own cat made if you send the artist a photo.

I’ll have a Hili head, please! Ten to one you’d scare the hell out of your cat if you put one on.

Screen Shot 2016-09-03 at 8.28.29 AM
Screen Shot 2016-09-03 at 8.27.21 AM

. . . The heads don’t come cheap, however. They sell for 648,000 yen, which is about $6,220 US dollars. You can purchase them online from the Japanese site Dwango. The cost is pretty steep, but can you really put a price on walking around with a giant cat head and creeping out everyone around you?

Screen Shot 2016-09-03 at 8.28.17 AM

06141609_575fadc0a907c

For lagniappe, go read “Careless Whisker” (great title!) at the Guardian, describing an album of music for cats that will be released in late October.

h/t: Merilee

Readers’ wildlife photographs

September 3, 2016 • 7:30 am

Today we’re catching up with the backlog of photos I have from Mark Sturtevant. Be sure to keep your own wildlife photos coming in; I prefer to get between 4 and 10 photos, and please give IDs, including Latin binomials. Thanks!

Mark’s notes are indented:

Here is another installment of arthropods that I have photographed over this summer.

The first is one of our most familiar jumping spiders, the ‘bold jumper’, or Phidipus audax. This very pregnant girl was found on what I have dubbed my ‘magic tree stump’, since it is where I have made several very good finds. The caterpillar she is carrying appears to be for the eight-spotted forester moth (Alypia octomaculata).

1Phidipus

Next is another jumping spider. I occasionally see these, and was curious to learn what they were. It turns out that it is probably one of many subspecies of Phidipus audax, and that not all of them have green chelicerae. I was rather surprised to learn that.

2Phidipus2

Next is this dragonfly, and my d*g it is the hairiest odonate I have ever seen. I would frequently see this species patrolling meadows as this one was, but I could never get a picture since they would not land. After once again not getting a picture of this mystery dragonfly, I was later chased out of the woods by an approaching rain shower. On my way to the car I checked the meadow where I had earlier seen one on patrol, and saw it perched, maybe retiring as I was because of rising winds and increasing rain. So at last I got a picture. It is probably the common baskettail (Epitheca cynosura), but I cannot entirely rule out the very similar slender baskettail (E. costalis). They are really hard to tell apart, differing in tiny details like the amount of pigment at the base of the wings (and the pigment is variable), and the height of the tooth that projects downward from the cerci at the end of the abdomen.

3Baskettail

Although it is kind of random, readers in the Midwest and also Eastern U.S. might want to check out this web site developed by the Ohio DNR. It contains a lovely series of online field guides to various animal groups in Ohio, and it was from their field guide on dragonflies and damselflies that I easily narrowed down identifying the above dragonfly.

Next, ever have a loudly buzzing and rather scratchy insect land on the back of your neck? For most people you can at least swat it away, with some chance of not getting stung if it was a bee or wasp. But I can’t do that since I might want to take its picture. Anyway, I took a chance and grabbed this large insect that had landed on my neck, and was rewarded by this beautiful metallic wood borer (Dicerca sp.).

4MetallicWoodBorer

Finally we have this rather odd looking ant, with a strangely small head and remarkably long legs. It turns out to be a male black carpenter ant (Camponotus pennsylvanicus).

5MaleAnt

Saturday: Hili dialogue

September 3, 2016 • 6:30 am

We’re set for a beautiful and COOL weekend in Chicago, with highs today about 74°F (23°C), and no rain. And hooray—today is National Hummingbird Day! Since many readers have hummingbird feeders, make sure you check yours, and perhaps give them a special treat, like maple syrup or honey!

On this day in 1935, Malcolm Campbell became the first person to exceed 300 mph in a car, driving on the Bonneville Salt Flats in Utah and averaging 301.337 mph (484.955 km/h) in two runs. Exactly 8 years later, in 1943, Zyklon B, which produces cyanide gas, was first used by the Nazis to exterminate people. That was at Auschwitz, and the victims were Soviet prisoners of war.

Notables born on this day include the actor Alan Ladd (1913). Below is my dad (right) with Ladd (left) in front of the Parthenon in Athens; Ladd was there to film Boy on a Dolphin with Sophia Loren, in 1956. My dad, an Army officer, had helped the film crew procure vehicles and gas from the Army motor pool, for gas was still scarce in postwar Greece. I also have a photo of my dad with the young Sophia Loren, which I’ll post on her birthday (Sept. 20; someone remind me the day before!).

Floyd and Ladd

Those who died on this day include Ivan Turgenev (1883), E. E. Cummings (1962), Pauline Kael (2001), and Sun Myung Moon (2012). Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is quoting Karl Marx (“Freedom is consciousness of necessity”)! How did she learn that quote? Anyway, she looks cute:

A: What are you thinking about?
Hili: About the problem of consciousness of necessity.
A: And?
Hili: It’s a weak consciousness.
P1040756
In Polish:
Ja: Nad czym myślisz?
Hili: Nad problemem uświadomionej konieczności.
Ja: I co?
Hili: Słabo uświadomiona.
And in Winnipeg Gus, like all cats, drinks out of inappropriate vessels:
IMG_5872

I’m #3

September 2, 2016 • 4:00 pm

This is gratifying, despite the numerous creationists infesting the comments—people who don’t know squat about biology and nevertheless feel compelled to pronounce on it. Several people said, “We know nothing about speciation,” apparently unaware that I wrote a 450-page book telling biologists what we know (and want to know) about that very field!

Even worse are those who, having no arguments, just call me names; as Hitchens said, “If they start insulting you, you know they’ve got nothing.” Or something like that.  (By the way, should remarks attacking the evolution of humans be called ad hominin?) Fortunately, my skin is too thick to be disturbed by them, though I briefly thought of playing the victim and starting a pity-based Patreon.

Screen Shot 2016-09-02 at 3.43.48 PM

I may post tomorrow on some of the craziness in the 500-odd comments on my Post review of Tom Wolfe’s new book.