Welcome to The Cruelest Day: it is Tuesday, March 4, 2025 and National Pączki Day, the Polish version of the American jam donut, but much better, as they’re made with yeast and allowed to rise. Here are some pączki I photographed in Katowice last December during the Science Festival, and one below that purchased and eating in Krakow in 2013. Oy, were they good!
It’s also National Poundcake Day, International Pancake Day, Mardi Gras, National Snack Day, World Obesity Day (!), and National Grammar Day (at least they didn’t say “National Grammar Lover’s Day”).
Given the level of engagement yesterday, I think that the end of the science posts has arrived.
Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the March 4 Wikipedia page.
Da Nooz: The news is thin today as I had a busy day and little time to write here.
*Fricking Trump has hit Canada, China and Mexico with tariffs. He means business, and this is bad for the consumer (see later post for whom the Democrats should nominate in 2028):
China imposed tariffs on various U.S. food exports early Tuesday, responding swiftly to the Trump administration’s latest tariffs and escalating a global dispute that has rattled governments and international trade. Canada, which was also targeted by the Trump tariffs that took effect after midnight, immediately imposed retaliatory measures and Mexico was expected to respond later today.
China’s finance ministry announced 15 percent tariffs on imports of chicken, wheat, corn and cotton from the United States, as well as 10 percent tariffs on imports of sorghum, soybeans, pork, beef, aquatic products, fruits, vegetables and dairy products.
President Trump’s new tariffs — 25 percent on most imports from Canada and Mexico, and 10 percent on imports from China — will make good on his campaign promise to rework America’s trade relations, and they are likely to encourage some manufacturers to set up factories in the United States, instead of in other countries.
Canada responded by imposing 25 percent tariffs on $30 billion worth of goods at 12:01 a.m. Eastern but did not specify which products would be affected. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada said in a statement that the tariffs would extend to $125 billion of American goods in 21 days.
By altering the terms of trade between the United States and its largest economic partners, the tariffs will also probably rattle supply chains, strain some of the country’s most important diplomatic relationships and add significant costs for American consumers and manufacturers.
Here’s what you need to know:
Mexico pushes back: As President Trump uses the hammer of tariffs as a negotiating tool against Mexico, a sense of Mexican nationalism has been strengthened and the country’s president, Claudia Sheinbaum, has seen her approval ratings rise.
Canadian reaction: It remains unclear what is at the root of Mr. Trump’s love-hate relationship with Canada. But there is widespread consensus in the country that tariffs would inflict major damage on its economy, which is dependent on exports as well as industries that are tightly integrated with the American market.
Tariff basics: Trade wars were a feature of Mr. Trump’s first term in the White House. But his latest tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China could broaden the scale of disruptions. The three countries account for more than a third of the products brought into the United States, supporting tens of millions of American jobs.
Of course prices will go up for us as well as the Mexicans, Canadians, and Chinese. No good will come of this, that’s for sure. Once again we are alienating some of our allies. All I can do is apologize for our narcissistic leader.
*Trump has sort of scuppered himself, foodwise. According to the WSJ, RFK Jr. is trying to eliminate government benefits, like food stamps, being used to buy sugary drinks like Coke and Pepsi.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. calls it “poison.” President Trump has multiple cans of it every day. Welcome to the 2025 soda wars.
At both state and federal levels, the Kennedy-led Make America Healthy Again movement is backing efforts to prevent people from spending food-aid benefits on sugary, carbonated beverages. Now, they are gaining momentum with an administration led by a man who enjoys soda so much that he had a red button installed on his desk for a valet to bring him a Diet Coke.
Beverage companies are nervous about the push and preparing a counterpush of their own.
Liberal-leaning states including New York and Minnesota have tried in the past to strip soda from state food-aid programs, saying it would boost their nutritional impact. But the U.S. Agriculture Department, which oversees the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, has rejected the requests for more than 20 years, saying it would be too complicated to implement. This year, deep-red Arkansas may be the first to get a different answer.
The state is preparing to ask the USDA if it can restrict some less-healthy items, including potentially soda, candy and desserts, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in an interview Friday.
“Nobody is anti-Diet Coke. Nobody is anti-soft drink. I like a soft drink, too. It’s whether or not the government should be paying for it,” said Sanders, who was Trump’s press secretary in his first term.
Currently SNAP recipients can purchase most food with the benefits, but not items such as pet food or alcohol. Sanders said the state is still fine-tuning the language of its waiver request.
Trump’s new agriculture secretary, Brooke Rollins, has indicated she is inclined to grant such waivers. She sent governors a letter on her first full day in office, urging them to propose pilot programs testing changes to food aid.
. . . . “When a taxpayer is putting money into SNAP, are they OK with us using their tax dollars to feed really bad food and sugary drinks to children, who perhaps need something more nutritious?” Rollins told reporters recently outside the White House.
Meanwhile in Washington, an alarmed Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and their band of lobbyists are trying to persuade Trump such steps would alienate his core voters. The chief executive of Coca-Cola, James Quincey, spent about an hour with Trump during the transition, presenting him a commemorative inaugural Diet Coke. “Our principal objective is to make sure we offer those consumers options,” Quincey said.
The American Beverage Association, a trade group that represents soda and juice makers, commissioned polling this year showing that nearly 60% of those who voted for Trump last fall support allowing soda purchases with food aid.
Well of course Trump will still be buying sodas; he doesn’t use food stamps! I have mixed feelings. Should we be subsidizing this stuff. If no alcohol, why not no sugary Coke? On the other hand, I drink only diet sodas, and in moderation; would they be exempt? I wonder how readers feel about this one. And don’t mention Social Security or Medicare. . . .
*Deborah Lipstadt was the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism under President Biden. Now she has rejected an offer of a visiting professorship from Columbia University, explaining at the Free Press “Why I Won’t Teach at Columbia.”
My decision to withdraw my name from consideration for a teaching post at Columbia is based on three calculations.
First, I am not convinced that the university is serious about taking the necessary and difficult measures that would create an atmosphere that allows for true inquiry.
Second, I fear that my presence would be used as a sop to convince the outside world that “Yes, we in the Columbia/Barnard orbit are fighting antisemitism. We even brought in the former Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism.” I will not be used to provide cover for a completely unacceptable situation.
Third, I am not sure that I would be safe or even able to teach without being harassed. I do not flinch in the face of threats. But this is not a healthy or acceptable learning environment.
On too many university campuses, the inmates—and these may include administrators, student disrupters, and off-campus agitators as well as faculty members—are running the asylum. They are turning universities into parodies of true academic inquiry.
We are at a crisis point. Unless this situation is addressed forcefully and unequivocally, one of America’s great institutions, its system of higher education, could well collapse. There are many in this country—including those in significant positions of power—who would delight in seeing that happen. The failure to stand up to disrupters who are preventing other students from learning gives the opponents of higher education the very tools they need.
Meanwhile, absent direct and comprehensive action to protect Jewish students and the campus environment, I will not be teaching on Columbia’s campus.
Although the students who recently occupied a building at Columbia were protesting the expulsion of students who broke the rules at the sister school Barnard, Columbia wiggled out of any responsibility this way:
But watching Barnard capitulate to mob violence and fail to enforce its own rules and regulations led me to conclude that I could not go to Columbia University, even for a single semester.
I conveyed this to Columbia’s administration on Friday, which prompted Columbia’s interim president, Katrina Armstrong, to call me. She pointed out that the two institutions, Barnard and Columbia, while affiliated, have separate administrations, security teams, and policies. I know this is true. But its recent history regarding demonstrations suggests that it has far less than a firm commitment to the free exchange of ideas, or to preventing classroom disruptions or even condemning disrupters and their demonstrations.
During the Barnard protest, Columbia issued an anodyne statement disclaiming responsibility because the “disruption” was on Barnard’s campus, not Columbia’s, and asserting its commitment “to supporting our Columbia student body and our campus community during this challenging time.” No condemnation.
*The Oscar winners, except for “Flow”, which I predicted would win for Best Animated feature film, surprised me. Here is the list of winners in major categories.
Best picture:
“Anora” – *WINNER
“The Brutalist”
“A Complete Unknown”
“Conclave”
“Dune: Part Two”
“Emilia Pérez”
“I’m Still Here”
“Nickel Boys”
“The Substance”
“Wicked”
I saw only “Anora” and “A Complete Unknown, but I thought neither was a world-beater.
Best actor in a leading role:
Adrien Brody, “The Brutalist” – *WINNER
Timothée Chalamet, “A Complete Unknown”
Colman Domingo, “Sing Sing”
Ralph Fiennes, “Conclave”
Sebastian Stan, “The Apprentice”
I will be seeing “The Brutalist”
Best actress in a leading role:
Cynthia Erivo, “Wicked”
Karla Sofía Gascón, “Emilia Pérez”
Mikey Madison, “Anora” – *WINNER
Demi Moore, “The Substance”
Fernanda Torres, “I’m Still Here”
Best actress in a supporting role:
Zoe Saldaña, “Emilia Pérez” – *WINNER
Best actor in a supporting role:
Kieran Culkin, “A Real Pain” – *WINNER
Best director:
Sean Baker, “Anora” – *WINNER
Brady Corbet, “The Brutalist”
James Mangold, “A Complete Unknown”
Jacques Audiard, “Emilia Pérez”
Coralie Fargeat, “The Substance”
Best original screenplay:
“Anora” – *WINNER
Annnnnnnd, . , Best animated feature film:
“Flow” – *WINNER
“Inside Out 2”
“Memoir of a Snail”
“Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl”
“The Wild Robot”
All I can say is that I’m going to see “The Brutalist” and that you have to see “Flow”. Here’s the trailer:
Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili wants her chair:
A: Could you make a piece of the chair available for me?Hili: Go and wash the dishes.
Ja: Czy możesz mi udostępnić kawałek fotela?Hili: Idź pozmywać naczynia.
*******************
From Godless Mom:
From My Cat is an Asshole:
From Things With Faces; unhappy feet:
I am still pondering whether “gender” has a substantive meaning despite the assertion of many that it is pure superstition, like the Holy Ghost. Here JKR calls out the notion as authoritarian:
🙄The fringe idea that we all have a ‘gender identity’ that may or may not match our biological sex is the whole point of this discussion. Trans activists act as though the existence of ‘gender identity’ is a settled, self-evident point, when to the vast majority of the world… pic.twitter.com/90R4KUGUWP
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) March 3, 2025
From Malgorzata:
Gee, NYT, last I saw the somber Gazans they were dancing around the coffins of murdered children. So spare me. pic.twitter.com/3gPeCKljtv
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) March 1, 2025
Two cat posts from my Twitter feed:
bro is a logo pic.twitter.com/7VQqcoKbjE
— Punch Cat (@PunchingCat) March 1, 2025
Sound up:
Bro really said “👋” pic.twitter.com/AegYWv9qiS
— contents that ll heal your depression 🌻 (@catshealdeprsn) March 3, 2025
. . . and one from my BlueHair feed:
Always wondering how nature can produce such crazy landscape… Well, I know how it happens, but still feels unbelievable.Cappadocia, 2024. aerial.#bluesky #photography #nature #art #landscape #geology
— Armand Sarlangue (@armandsarlangue.bsky.social) 2025-03-03T14:55:12.595Z
From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I reposted:
A German woman and her infant were gassed to death upon arriving at Auschwitz, along with 1020 other Norwegian and German Jews.
— Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-03-04T11:18:26.847Z
Two from Matthew. Here’s a “kot”:
Be nice or go away.
— MissyBBBobtail (@missybbbobtail.bsky.social) 2025-03-01T17:16:38.797Z
. . . and a post from his recent trip to Asilomar:
Beach outside Monterey with Harbour seals
— Matthew Cobb (@matthewcobb.bsky.social) 2025-02-27T21:47:29.178Z








































