Tuesday: Hili dialogue

March 4, 2025 • 6:45 am

Welcome to The Cruelest Day: it is Tuesday, March 4, 2025 and National Pączki  Day, the Polish version of the American jam donut, but much better, as they’re made with yeast and allowed to rise. Here are some pączki I photographed in Katowice last December during the Science Festival, and one below that purchased and eating in Krakow in 2013. Oy, were they good!

It’s also National Poundcake Day, International Pancake Day, Mardi Gras, National Snack Day, World Obesity Day (!), and National Grammar Day (at least they didn’t say “National Grammar Lover’s Day”).

Given the level of engagement yesterday, I think that the end of the science posts has arrived.

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the March 4 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:  The news is thin today as I had a busy day and little time to write here.

*Fricking Trump has hit Canada, China and Mexico with tariffs. He means business, and this is bad for the consumer (see later post for whom the Democrats should nominate in 2028):

China imposed tariffs on various U.S. food exports early Tuesday, responding swiftly to the Trump administration’s latest tariffs and escalating a global dispute that has rattled governments and international trade. Canada, which was also targeted by the Trump tariffs that took effect after midnight, immediately imposed retaliatory measures and Mexico was expected to respond later today.

China’s finance ministry announced 15 percent tariffs on imports of chicken, wheat, corn and cotton from the United States, as well as 10 percent tariffs on imports of sorghum, soybeans, pork, beef, aquatic products, fruits, vegetables and dairy products.

President Trump’s new tariffs — 25 percent on most imports from Canada and Mexico, and 10 percent on imports from China — will make good on his campaign promise to rework America’s trade relations, and they are likely to encourage some manufacturers to set up factories in the United States, instead of in other countries.

Canada responded by imposing 25 percent tariffs on $30 billion worth of goods at 12:01 a.m. Eastern but did not specify which products would be affected. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada said in a statement that the tariffs would extend to $125 billion of American goods in 21 days.

By altering the terms of trade between the United States and its largest economic partners, the tariffs will also probably rattle supply chains, strain some of the country’s most important diplomatic relationships and add significant costs for American consumers and manufacturers.

Here’s what you need to know:

  • Mexico pushes back: As President Trump uses the hammer of tariffs as a negotiating tool against Mexico, a sense of Mexican nationalism has been strengthened and the country’s president, Claudia Sheinbaum, has seen her approval ratings rise.

  • Canadian reaction: It remains unclear what is at the root of Mr. Trump’s love-hate relationship with Canada. But there is widespread consensus in the country that tariffs would inflict major damage on its economy, which is dependent on exports as well as industries that are tightly integrated with the American market.

  • Tariff basics: Trade wars were a feature of Mr. Trump’s first term in the White House. But his latest tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China could broaden the scale of disruptions. The three countries account for more than a third of the products brought into the United States, supporting tens of millions of American jobs.

Of course prices will go up for us as well as the Mexicans, Canadians, and Chinese. No good will come of this, that’s for sure. Once again we are alienating some of our allies. All I can do is apologize for our narcissistic leader.

*Trump has sort of scuppered himself, foodwise. According to the WSJ, RFK Jr. is trying to eliminate government benefits, like food stamps, being used to buy sugary drinks like Coke and Pepsi.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. calls it “poison.” President Trump has multiple cans of it every day. Welcome to the 2025 soda wars.

At both state and federal levels, the Kennedy-led Make America Healthy Again movement is backing efforts to prevent people from spending food-aid benefits on sugary, carbonated beverages. Now, they are gaining momentum with an administration led by a man who enjoys soda so much that he had a red button installed on his desk for a valet to bring him a Diet Coke.

Beverage companies are nervous about the push and preparing a counterpush of their own.

Liberal-leaning states including New York and Minnesota have tried in the past to strip soda from state food-aid programs, saying it would boost their nutritional impact. But the U.S. Agriculture Department, which oversees the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, has rejected the requests for more than 20 years, saying it would be too complicated to implement. This year, deep-red Arkansas may be the first to get a different answer.

The state is preparing to ask the USDA if it can restrict some less-healthy items, including potentially soda, candy and desserts, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in an interview Friday.

“Nobody is anti-Diet Coke. Nobody is anti-soft drink. I like a soft drink, too. It’s whether or not the government should be paying for it,” said Sanders, who was Trump’s press secretary in his first term.

Currently SNAP recipients can purchase most food with the benefits, but not items such as pet food or alcohol. Sanders said the state is still fine-tuning the language of its waiver request.

Trump’s new agriculture secretary, Brooke Rollins, has indicated she is inclined to grant such waivers. She sent governors a letter on her first full day in office, urging them to propose pilot programs testing changes to food aid.

. . . . “When a taxpayer is putting money into SNAP, are they OK with us using their tax dollars to feed really bad food and sugary drinks to children, who perhaps need something more nutritious?” Rollins told reporters recently outside the White House.

Meanwhile in Washington, an alarmed Coca-ColaPepsiCo and their band of lobbyists are trying to persuade Trump such steps would alienate his core voters. The chief executive of Coca-Cola, James Quincey, spent about an hour with Trump during the transition, presenting him a commemorative inaugural Diet Coke. “Our principal objective is to make sure we offer those consumers options,” Quincey said.

The American Beverage Association, a trade group that represents soda and juice makers, commissioned polling this year showing that nearly 60% of those who voted for Trump last fall support allowing soda purchases with food aid.

Well of course Trump will still be buying sodas; he doesn’t use food stamps!  I have mixed feelings.  Should we be subsidizing this stuff. If no alcohol, why not no sugary Coke? On the other hand, I drink only diet sodas, and in moderation; would they be exempt?  I wonder how readers feel about this one.  And don’t mention Social Security or Medicare. . . .

*Deborah Lipstadt was the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism under President Biden. Now she has rejected an offer of a visiting professorship from Columbia University, explaining at the Free PressWhy I Won’t Teach at Columbia.”

My decision to withdraw my name from consideration for a teaching post at Columbia is based on three calculations.

First, I am not convinced that the university is serious about taking the necessary and difficult measures that would create an atmosphere that allows for true inquiry.

Second, I fear that my presence would be used as a sop to convince the outside world that “Yes, we in the Columbia/Barnard orbit are fighting antisemitism. We even brought in the former Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism.” I will not be used to provide cover for a completely unacceptable situation.

Third, I am not sure that I would be safe or even able to teach without being harassed. I do not flinch in the face of threats. But this is not a healthy or acceptable learning environment.

On too many university campuses, the inmates—and these may include administrators, student disrupters, and off-campus agitators as well as faculty members—are running the asylum. They are turning universities into parodies of true academic inquiry.

We are at a crisis point. Unless this situation is addressed forcefully and unequivocally, one of America’s great institutions, its system of higher education, could well collapse. There are many in this country—including those in significant positions of power—who would delight in seeing that happen. The failure to stand up to disrupters who are preventing other students from learning gives the opponents of higher education the very tools they need.

Meanwhile, absent direct and comprehensive action to protect Jewish students and the campus environment, I will not be teaching on Columbia’s campus.

Although the students who recently occupied a building at Columbia were protesting the expulsion of students who broke the rules at the sister school Barnard,  Columbia wiggled out of any responsibility this way:

But watching Barnard capitulate to mob violence and fail to enforce its own rules and regulations led me to conclude that I could not go to Columbia University, even for a single semester.

I conveyed this to Columbia’s administration on Friday, which prompted Columbia’s interim president, Katrina Armstrong, to call me. She pointed out that the two institutions, Barnard and Columbia, while affiliated, have separate administrations, security teams, and policies. I know this is true. But its recent history regarding demonstrations suggests that it has far less than a firm commitment to the free exchange of ideas, or to preventing classroom disruptions or even condemning disrupters and their demonstrations.

During the Barnard protest, Columbia issued an anodyne statement disclaiming responsibility because the “disruption” was on Barnard’s campus, not Columbia’s, and asserting its commitment “to supporting our Columbia student body and our campus community during this challenging time.” No condemnation.

*The Oscar winners, except for “Flow”, which I predicted would win for Best Animated feature film,  surprised me. Here is the list of winners in major categories.

Best picture:

“Anora” – *WINNER

“The Brutalist”

“A Complete Unknown”

“Conclave”

“Dune: Part Two”

“Emilia Pérez”

“I’m Still Here”

“Nickel Boys”

“The Substance”

“Wicked”

I saw only “Anora” and “A Complete Unknown, but I thought neither was a world-beater.

Best actor in a leading role:

Adrien Brody, “The Brutalist” – *WINNER

Timothée Chalamet, “A Complete Unknown”

Colman Domingo, “Sing Sing”

Ralph Fiennes, “Conclave”

Sebastian Stan, “The Apprentice”

I will be seeing “The Brutalist”

Best actress in a leading role:

Cynthia Erivo, “Wicked”

Karla Sofía Gascón, “Emilia Pérez”

Mikey Madison, “Anora” – *WINNER

Demi Moore, “The Substance”

Fernanda Torres, “I’m Still Here”

Best actress in a supporting role:

Zoe Saldaña, “Emilia Pérez” – *WINNER

Best actor in a supporting role:

Kieran Culkin, “A Real Pain” – *WINNER

Best director:

Sean Baker, “Anora” – *WINNER

Brady Corbet, “The Brutalist”

James Mangold, “A Complete Unknown”

Jacques Audiard, “Emilia Pérez”

Coralie Fargeat, “The Substance”

Best original screenplay:

“Anora” – *WINNER

Annnnnnnd, . , Best animated feature film:

“Flow” – *WINNER

“Inside Out 2”

“Memoir of a Snail”

“Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl”

“The Wild Robot”

All I can say is that I’m going to see “The Brutalist” and that you have to see “Flow”. Here’s the trailer:

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili wants her chair:

A: Could you make a piece of the chair available for me?
Hili: Go and wash the dishes.
In Polish:
Ja: Czy możesz mi udostępnić kawałek fotela?
Hili: Idź pozmywać naczynia.

*******************

From Godless Mom:

From My Cat is an Asshole:

From Things With Faces; unhappy feet:

I am still pondering whether “gender” has a substantive meaning despite the assertion of many that it is pure superstition, like the Holy Ghost. Here JKR calls out the notion as authoritarian:

From Malgorzata:

Two cat posts from my Twitter feed:

Sound up:

. . . and one from my BlueHair feed:

Always wondering how nature can produce such crazy landscape… Well, I know how it happens, but still feels unbelievable.Cappadocia, 2024. aerial.#bluesky #photography #nature #art #landscape #geology

Armand Sarlangue (@armandsarlangue.bsky.social) 2025-03-03T14:55:12.595Z

From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I reposted:

A German woman and her infant were gassed to death upon arriving at Auschwitz, along with 1020 other Norwegian and German Jews.

Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-03-04T11:18:26.847Z

Two from Matthew. Here’s a “kot”:

Be nice or go away.

MissyBBBobtail (@missybbbobtail.bsky.social) 2025-03-01T17:16:38.797Z

. . . and a post from his recent trip to Asilomar:

Beach outside Monterey with Harbour seals

Matthew Cobb (@matthewcobb.bsky.social) 2025-02-27T21:47:29.178Z

Monday: Hili dialogue

March 3, 2025 • 6:45 am

Welcome to the beginning of the first work week in March: it’s Monday, March 3, 2025, and National Cold Cuts Day. Here’s a huge (3+ pounds) sub from Chicago, and not far from me (I’ve never been there):

It’s also 33 Flavors Day, celebrating Baskin-Robbins, Moscow Mule Day (a great drink), Canadian Bacon Day, National Mulled Wine Day, Shrove Monday, World Wildlife DayCream Bun Day in Iceland, and National Soup it Forward Day, whose meaning I don’t know. But remember this?

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the March 3 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*Israel has halted aid to Gaza after the terrorist group has refused to extend the first phase of the cease-fire (Hamas is demanding that Israel remove its troops from the border with Egypt, which are used for smuggling weapons and material).

Israel said Sunday it would not allow any more goods to enter Gaza over what it called Hamas’s refusal to accept a proposal to extend the expiring initial stage of the ceasefire and hostage release deal, and threatened “additional consequences” and a return to war.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government said the move had rock-solid backing from US President Donald Trump’s White House, even as Jerusalem appeared to back away from its previous agreement with Hamas to negotiate a second phase of the ceasefire during which additional hostages would be released and Israel would fully withdraw from Gaza.

“With the end of phase one of the hostage deal and in light of Hamas’s refusal to accept the [US special envoy Steve] Witkoff outline for continuing talks – to which Israel agreed – Prime Minister Netanyahu has decided that, as of this morning, all entry of goods and supplies into the Gaza Strip will cease,” the Prime Minister’s Office said in a statement Sunday morning.

Israel said Sunday it would not allow any more goods to enter Gaza over what it called Hamas’s refusal to accept a proposal to extend the expiring initial stage of the ceasefire and hostage release deal, and threatened “additional consequences” and a return to war.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government said the move had rock-solid backing from US President Donald Trump’s White House, even as Jerusalem appeared to back away from its previous agreement with Hamas to negotiate a second phase of the ceasefire during which additional hostages would be released and Israel would fully withdraw from Gaza.

“With the end of phase one of the hostage deal and in light of Hamas’s refusal to accept the [US special envoy Steve] Witkoff outline for continuing talks – to which Israel agreed – Prime Minister Netanyahu has decided that, as of this morning, all entry of goods and supplies into the Gaza Strip will cease,” the Prime Minister’s Office said in a statement Sunday morning.

“Israel will not allow a ceasefire without the release of our hostages,” the PMO added, threatening “further consequences” if Hamas continues to say no to the proposal.

It later denied a report in Arabic-language media that Netanyahu had dispatched a delegation to Egypt for talks.

Netanyahu also claimed at his weekly cabinet meeting that Hamas is diverting aid entering the Strip for its own use.

“Hamas is currently taking control of all supplies and goods sent to the Gaza Strip. It is abusing the Gazan population who are trying to receive the aid, it is shooting at them, and is turning humanitarian aid into a terrorist budget directed against us,” he said.

According to the Kan public broadcaster, Israel believes enough aid has entered the enclave in recent weeks to last Gaza for several months. Jerusalem has  questioned the veracity of reports of famine in the enclave over the course of the war, which has been blamed on a lack of sufficient aid flowing into the Strip via Israel-controlled border crossings.

. . . Under the ceasefire outline agreed to by Israel and Hamas on January 19, the remaining living hostages were to be released during the second stage of the deal, during which the IDF would complete a full withdrawal from Gaza. A third stage is also planned, during which the bodies of hostages held by Gazan terror groups would be released, the war would end, and the reconstruction of Gaza would begin.

The U.S. is endorsing Israel’s actions, even though the world will soon begin baying that Gazans are starving (that’s always been untrue) and even though Hamas takes most of the aid.  Unless you lack neurons, you’ll realize that Hamas will never agree to let all the living hostages go, as they are the ticket to their continuing in power. With no living hostages, there’s little impetus for Israel to allow Hamas to continue to rule, which they’ve said is intolerable—and it is. My prediction is that this will be drawn out considerably, but eventually the war will resume.

*As reader Jez comments, and as reported in the Guardian, “Rather bizarre, but it looks like the British prime minister and the monarchy are trying to undermine the official invitation for a state visit that Keir Starmer extended to Trump on Thursday by pre-emptively hosting Zelenskyy”:

King Charles will hold an ­official audience at Sandringham with the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Sunday as the UK and EU demonstrate their “unwavering” ­support after his humiliation at the hands of Donald Trump and JD Vance in the White House.

Keir Starmer will also host European heads of government and the leaders of Canada and Turkey at a special defence summit aimed at presenting a united front on the Ukraine crisis.

On arrival in Downing Street for a meeting with Starmer on Saturday night, just 24 hours after Trump and his vice-president Vance subjected him to a 10-minute tirade in the Oval Office, Zelenskyy said he was “very happy” that the king had agreed to the meeting.

The offer of a royal audience was seen at Westminster as a deliberate move to give the Ukrainian president equal treatment to Trump, who was presented during his meeting at the White House on Wednesday by Starmer with an invitation to a ­second state visit to the UK, including a meeting with King Charles.

Last night there were reports that the UK would show further solidarity by unlocking billions of pounds of frozen Russian assets to Ukraine. The Sunday Times claimed Rachel Reeves would divert money earmarked for green investment in the UK to the defence industry. It would be the first time that money from frozen Russian assets would contribute towards military spending.

The irate exchanges between Trump and Vance, on the US side, and Zelenskyy, which led to the Ukrainian president being told to leave the White House before any formal talks took place, led to fears among European and other world leaders of irreparable damage to the western alliance, and to the hopes of peace in Ukraine’s war with Russia. At today’s defence summit, which demonstrates the increasingly central role being played by the UK in Europe’s defence and security, Starmer will be clear that Europe must stand united against President Putin.

I’m especially heartened that King Charles, though he has little power, encouraged this move. The Brits are acting like menschen, while Trump and Vance, osculating Putin’s rump, look like dopes. I’m not sure what Trump intended to accomplish by humiliating Zelensky in public, but he gained nothing from it. This shows more clearly than ever how much he’s sundered America from its allies, but the one problem is that the U.S. alone can’t support Ukraine if it continues to fight rather than take Trump’s rotten offer.

*The NYT is flogging Christianity again, this time giving Nicholas Wolterstorff a theologian and philosopher of religion, a Q&A in which he discusses his faith with religionist Peter Wehner.  (Wolterstorff’s son was killed in a mountain-climbing accident at age 25, which surely motivated his answer to the first question (in bold; Wolterstorff answers are in plain text).

A two-part question, and I’ll start with this one. Throughout your career, you’ve obviously heard a lot of philosophical debates about Christianity, about belief in God. What do you believe is the strongest philosophical case against Christianity, and what’s your response to it?

I suppose the most powerful case against Christianity is the problem of evil. And that’s a serious problem for all human beings — Christians, non-Christians. My view on that has come to be something like this: A classic view was that God makes everything happen, and Augustine’s view was that evil in the world was sort of like dissonance in a fugue of Johann Sebastian Bach. It has to be there. It plays a significant role in the whole, entire composition.

I’ve long been impressed by the early-20th-century writings of Karl Barth on God and evil, and what Barth highlights in Christian Scripture is just a note of a battle going on. What the New Testament writers called the principalities and powers. God’s not doing everything, but there’s something mysterious — Barth uses the German term for “nothingness” — that’s abroad in the world. Other writers in Scripture call it Satan. And so what strikes me, Pete, as a deep theme in Christian Scripture is that God is dismayed, not displeased, but dismayed by some of the things that happened in human affairs.

I guess in a way, the Book of Job probably answers that question.

Exactly, exactly.

This is why theology is a useless discipline, for there is no observation so at variance with their notions of God that can’t be rationalized away. In this case, evil is due to “Satan,” though Wolsterstorff won’t say he accepts it. He uses the euphemism “there’s something mysterious that’s abroad in the world.”  Apparently God is not omnipotent, and perhaps Satan killed Wolterstorff’s son. (That’s glib, but Wolterstorff himself has pondered that enigmatic event.)

Job doesn’t get an answer from God other than: Look at all I’ve created and who I am. Now, the second part of the question. What do you think is the strongest argument, philosophically or otherwise, for Christianity? To put it another way, on what basis are you a Christian? Is it rooted in your philosophical outlook? Is it aesthetics? Is it both? Is it something else?

It’s not arguments. The traditional view — well, the traditional view of the 17th, 18th, 19th or early 20th centuries — was that to be a responsible religious believer, one had to have arguments. That has come under heavy philosophical attack over the last 40 years. And I think that very few philosophers would hold that position anymore. For me, there are two things, and they’re not arguments. They’re more like experience or reflection or something like that.

One is Creation. We now know that, as opposed to the Greeks, who thought that things had always been this way, they haven’t always been this way, that there was a Big Bang. And so that obviously invites the question: There has to have been some sort of existence or being before — “before” is the right word — this Big Bang. There’s always been existence, never just nothingness. And the biblical word for that is “Creation,” of course. It’s not quite an argument, I guess, but it’s reflection on the very existence of this world of ours.

And the second part of it for me is the Resurrection of Christ. If there had not been a Resurrection, I think it would have been plausible to view Christ as a really extraordinary, exceptional prophet. But the Resurrection tells us something more was at stake, that he’s not just one among other prophets. And I find the New Testament accounts compelling. So it’s Creation and Resurrection. Those two were my anchors for my Christian faith.’

There’s not much to say here save Wolsterstorff’s apparent ignorance of physics (there was no “time” before the Big Bang and, at any rate, if God created time, who created God?) As for the Resurrection, well, the theologian just swallows the New Testament whole.

Wolterstorff also makes some of the science-related arguments for God used by Ross Douthat in his recent book:

. . . . more specifically, we philosophers don’t have a good account of consciousness. We recognize that there is such a thing as consciousness. But what is it? It remains a philosophical mystery. For me, another mystery that, so far as I can see, evolutionary accounts don’t explain is the fact that we human beings can engage, do engage, in abstract reasoning, mathematics of an extraordinarily complicated sort, which plays no evolutionary role. They don’t help to get water or grow oats or anything like that.

Consciousness and this extraordinary ability to engage in purely abstract, mathematical, logical, philosophical thought other than just pragmatic reasoning, which enables you to get food or clothes or something like that — it’s those remarkable features that materialist accounts can’t deal with.

These are of course god-of-the-gaps arguments, and scientists have dealt with them using “materialistic accounts”. These apologists just don’t realize that once you’ve evolved a big brain and can live in small groups with other humans, you can do a lot of other stuff as epiphenomena.  After all, humans painted on caves early in our evolution; did God give us artistic abilities, too?

*Yesterday I wrote about how the Maine legislature had both censured and censored one of its members, Rep. Laurel Libby, for posting photos of a trans-identified male teenager on the podium after having won a girls’ athletic event, The editorial board of the WSJ notes, correctly, that this kind of behavior is going to cost Democrats elections. It’s clear that Libby was silenced for her sentiments, not posting the picture. (The excuse was that she photographed a teen, but it seems the teen was willing to be photographed, and this is not illegal.

If Democrats want to know why so many voters abandoned them in November, they could take a gander at the progressive meltdown in Maine. On Tuesday the Maine House of Representatives voted to censure Republican Rep. Laurel Libby for posting photos of a transgender high school athlete on Facebook.

The teenager, who previously competed in boys’ track and field, switched to compete in the girls’ pole vault this year, winning the class B state championship. “This is outrageous and unfair to the many female athletes who work every day to succeed in their respective sports,” Ms. Libby wrote on Facebook.

Cue full-on progressive derangement. Lawmakers voted 75-70 to formally reprimand Ms. Libby. The censure means she isn’t allowed to speak or vote in the Legislature unless she apologizes. She has said she will not.

Under the Maine constitution, expelling a member requires a two-thirds majority, but state lawmakers have used the censure as a backdoor to silence Ms. Libby by a simple majority vote. Trying to speak in her own defense during the Maine House Resolution to censure her, Rep. Libby was repeatedly interrupted by other members challenging her remarks. She later posted her remarks on Facebook.

The progressive left claims she was “doxxing” a minor by posting the photo. But a state champion athlete has no reasonable expectation of privacy after winning a high-profile championship. Taking pictures of such victories and distributing them in the press or internet is routine. No law prohibits what Ms. Libby did, which is free political speech. Her post didn’t attack the athlete. It simply reposted the champion’s picture and noted that the same athlete had placed fifth in the men’s competition in a previous year.

The Legislature’s censure of Ms. Libby also deprives her of the right to vote on legislation, which in turn disenfranchises her constituents by denying them representation. What’s to stop the majority party from censuring any problematic lawmaker to make sure legislation passes? Democrats should be considering whether they really want to go down the road of regulating posts on social media.

. . . Republicans prospered politically in 2024 by campaigning on the unfairness of forcing girls to compete against testosterone-loaded transgender athletes. Now, to dodge a debate over their policy, Maine Democrats abuse their power by silencing a duly elected dissenter. They’ve learned nothing from defeat.

Democrats have learned nothing. They need to stop doubling down on the stuff that cost them the election, and they need to stop pushing biological men to compete against biological women. Most Americans recognize the palpable unfairness of that stand.

*As I write this on Sunday afternoon, I am aware that the Oscar awards are tonight, and I’m also aware that I won’t be watching them.  But the WaPo has two of its writers predict which movie will win Best Picture, and then opine on what is the real best picture. (They also do this for every year since 1974):

2024:

Dan Zak: “The Brutalist” proves one thing above all else: No film should ever cost more than $10 million. This 3.5-hour historical epic was filmed on the cheap, but the results are magnificent. A world-building movie about how we build worlds, and about what we destroy in the process, with a career-best performance by Adrien Brody — all buoyed by a sublime score by Daniel Blumberg.

Amy Argetsinger: “A Complete Unknown” pulled off multiple magic tricks as a biopic that avoided the usual biopic cringe and actually made a lot of money. Most miraculously, it enthralled (rather than ticked off) a righteous nation of Dylan fans — even though everyone knows that it was at a concert in Manchester, not the Newport Folk Festival, where an audience member shouted, “Judas!”

I’ve watched only two of these (“Anora” and “A Complete Unknown”), and while I found them both creditable films, I found neither of them to be a world beater.  I was not enthralled by the Dylan movie, though I was impressed by Chalamet’s ability to play and sing like Dylan, a skill he taught himself over five years.  “The Brutalist” will be the next film I watch, though I just watched a nominee for Best Animated Feature: “Flow“. Of course it’s about a cat, but there are no words in the movie, and no humans, just animal noises. (The cat gets involved with a group of friends that include a bird, a capybara, a ring-tailed lemur, and and even a d*g.  Nevertheless, this post-apocalyptic movie is mesmerizing, and good for both adults and kids. The ending is quite discombobulating. See it!

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili has a philosophical question:

Hili: What is happiness?
Andrzej: An exceptionally high level of satisfaction with the present moment.

In Polish:

Hili: Co to jest szczęście?
Ja: Nadzwyczajnie wysoki poziom zadowolenia z chwili obecnej.

*******************

From Cat Memes:

From Things with Faces, a “stretching fondue squirrel”:

From the 2025 Darwin Awards!!!/Epic Fails!!!:

This post by Masih can’t be embedded (obscenity??), so I’m posting a screenshot:

From Malgozata: the benighted thugs shut down an event that attempted to produce DIALOGUE between Israeli and Iranian students. Jebus!

From Barry: Weird behavior from a whitish wolf. Look at them choppers!

I've never seen a wolf be silly 😅😅

amazingnature ☘️ (@amazingnature.bsky.social) 2025-03-02T03:47:22.949Z

From Malcolm; a Facebook video of cats imitating people. I am truly stunned!

From my feed, a helpful goose trying to rescue a stuck goat:

From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I reposted:

Murdered in the gas chamber upon arriving at Auschwitz. This French Jewish girl was only eight years old.

Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-03-03T10:31:56.423Z

Two tweets from Dr. Cobb. First, some ancient but lovely and largely intact teacups:

Something lovely for the weekend! Marvellous Minoan cups known as Kamares Ware. They look so modern, yet they were made by Bronze Age potters about 3,800 years ago!Heraklion Archaeological Museum, Crete. 📷 by me#Archaeology

Alison Fisk (@alisonfisk.bsky.social) 2025-03-01T11:07:19.265Z

Narwhals! (But I can’t find any video from the drone.)

Drone captures narwhals using their tusks to explore, forage and playwww.eurekalert.org/news-release…

Roger Highfield (@rogerhighfield.bsky.social) 2025-03-02T07:28:58.979Z

Sunday: Hili dialogue

March 2, 2025 • 6:45 am

Welcome to Sabbath for goyische cats: it’s Sunday, March 2, 2025, and National Banana Cream Pie Day. Wikipedia has an article on it with tasty photos:

Dale Cruse, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

It’s a thin day for holidays, but there’s an important one: International Rescue Cat Day.

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the March 2 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*Now that Zelensky has been publicly and harshly had his tuchas smacked down by Trump and Vance, and then kicked out of the White House, what will he do now? He left without the mineral-rights deal Trump wanted, and, I think, Trump came off looking like a narcissistic bully, which is what he is.  Ukraine demands security rights (i.e., someone to guarantee that Russia won’t attack again and take more land), but Europe can’t provide that in the way that the U.S. can. Zelensky is in a dilemma, but doesn’t deserve the crap he had to take from Trump. The NYT analyzes the situation (article archived here):

After President Volodymyr Zelensky’s disastrous meeting with President Trump in the White House on Friday, many Ukrainians were moving toward a conclusion that seemed perfectly clear: Mr. Trump has chosen a side, and it is not Ukraine’s.

In one jaw-dropping meeting, the once unthinkable fear that Ukraine would be forced to engage in a long war against a stronger opponent without U.S. support appeared to move exponentially closer to reality.

“For Ukraine, it is clarifying, though not in a great way,” Phillips O’Brien, an international relations professor at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland, said in an interview. “Ukraine can now only count on European states for the support it needs to fight.”

An immediate result was that Ukrainians, including opposition politicians, were generally supportive of Mr. Zelensky on Saturday for not bending to Mr. Trump despite tremendous pressure.

Mr. Zelensky signaled on Saturday that he had not completely given up hope of repairing the relationship with Mr. Trump. Posting on social media, he went out of his way to thank the United States, perhaps trying to address Mr. Trump’s complaint on Friday that he was ungrateful.

“I’m thankful to President Trump, Congress for their bipartisan support, and American people,” he wrote. “Ukrainians have always appreciated this support, especially during these three years of full-scale invasion.”

At the same time, Mr. Zelensky began laying the groundwork for moving ahead with the European countries that have stood by Kyiv’s side. Ukraine announced plans on Saturday for a joint weapons venture with France that would be financed by the interest earned from frozen Russian assets.

Later in the day, Mr. Zelensky met with Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain, who has been a supporter of the Ukrainian president in the face of Mr. Trump’s harsh rebukes. On Sunday, Mr. Zelensky will attend a summit of European leaders hosted by Mr. Starmer.

The real affront that prompted the spectacle, many Ukrainians and analysts believe, is that Mr. Zelensky pushed back against some of Mr. Trump’s terms.

Along the front lines, some soldiers said that the realization was sinking in that Mr. Trump would probably not help Ukraine. “Trump chose his side in this war,” said Pvt. Serhiy Hnezdilov in a telephone interview from the front on Saturday.

It’s sad that European leaders are now supporting Zelensky while Trump supports the autocrat Putin, creating a rift between us and our European allies. And there’s no chance of NATO providing security guarantees, because the U.S. would have to approve that, and it won’t.  It sucks to be Zelensky now, but I admire him a lot.

*When we look back on this era from the remove of a few decades, we’ll see that sex and gender extremism had deeply corrupted liberals, leading to distrust of Democrats. That, at least, is the conclusion reached in this new Boston Globe column, “A new low for free speech: Democrats strip voting rights from Maine state representative over post on trans athletes.”  The subtitle is “Democrats can’t win the argument and know they’re out of step with public opinion. So they seem intent on silencing their opponents instead.” (h/t Jez)

Democrats fancy themselves the party that fights for women.

But on Tuesday, Maine House Speaker Ryan Fecteau, a Democrat, led the charge to take the vote away from one.

House Democrats voted, 75-70, to censure state Representative Laurel Libby, a Republican, and strip her of her vote and, by extension, her constituents of their representation in the Legislature until she apologizes for a Facebook post she made about a transgender student winning a girls high school track meet.

Her Feb. 17 post includes two pictures: one, from two years ago, that showed a male student standing on the fifth-place podium at a track meet; the other was from last week and showed the same student on the first-place podium, standing next to two girls with their faces blurred. The face of the transgender student — a minor — is shown clearly.

And this is where I pulled up.  If the transgender student is a minor, it’s not kosher to show their picture, and, indeed, that’s why Libby was formally censured.

Whether it’s fair for transgender athletes to compete in girls’ sports is something Libby could theoretically vote on in the Maine Legislature. While she could have made her point without a picture, she’s entitled to her opinion — and her constituents are entitled to hear it.

But in a scene that almost felt like satire, Fecteau gazed down from his lectern at Libby, mother of five, after she gave a speech about the importance of protecting girls’ sports ahead of the vote to censure her.

Or tried to give a speech. Over the course of about 10 minutes, Libby tried to explain herself, only to be interrupted mostly by Democratic men. “The member is beginning to skate on thin ice, as it relates to the course of debate in this chamber,” Fecteau told her from on high — after yet another interruption. Libby managed to get through less than one page of her seven-page floor speech.

Libby’s choice to depict a minor in a post was bound to draw criticism. Perhaps the inclusion of the photo was even unnecessary, with a national consensus on her side when it comes to the question of transgender athletes participating in girls’ sports. But she didn’t break any laws, and, as she has pointed out, public photos of the student had circulated widely before she posted about the track meet.

Nonetheless, instead of disagreeing with her, or debating with her, the Maine House moved to take away her vote, a sanction that should be reserved for politicians who commit only the most serious crimes related to corruption or public integrity. The punishment, on a party line vote, is vastly out of proportion to the supposed sin.

It’s a move that only underlines the illiberalism that’s associated with a progressive movement that refuses to see how certain instances of transgender participation in sports compromise the safety and fairness of girls’ athletics. A movement that has opted for shouting down dissent instead of debating their position.

Apparently, until she apologizes, which Libby has no intention of doing, she will not longer be entitled to speak or vote in the Maine House. Thus, it’s not just censuring but censorship. That is far too strict a punishment for something that, after all, is legal. One gets the feeling that the severity of the punishment—the vote was along party lines—is out of line with the magnitude of the transgression. And you know why: it’s blasphemy for a Democrat to suggest that trans-identified males should not compete in women’s sports. (Libby’s Twitter series that got her in trouble is here.)

*In his Weekly Dish post, Andrew Sullivan, a conservative, finds some solace from “The other resistance—on the Right.”  His piece launches from the opprobrium that the Republican Tate brothers, indicted in Romania for sexual violence (but allowed to leave that country), are receiving from fellow Republicans.

 Andrew Tate explained why he held out hope they could soon return to abusing women in the US:

The Tates will be free, Trump is the president. The good old days are back. And they will be better than ever.

I mention this not because I’m shocked. The two most prominent men in the Trump administration, after all, have either regularly “grabbed women by the pussy” or sired 13 kids from four different mothers — and evangelicals love them all the more. So of course, the Tates are beloved by Candace Owens, Benny Johnson, Richard Grenell, among other MAGA luminaries.

I mention it solely because some on the right actually don’t like the Tates at all. Ben Shapiro has fumed: “The right should DUMP Andrew Tate.” Chris Rufo called him “a common pimp with social media following.” Washington Examiner’s Kimberly Ross thundered: “The Left and Right don’t agree on much. But when it comes to a misogynistic predator such as Tate, we can agree on this: We don’t need more like him.” Senator Josh Hawley just said, “I don’t think conservatives should be glorifying this guy at all.” Super-rightist Pedro Gonzalez agreed: “Andrew Tate is a scumbag. Whatever cultural forces propelled his rise, Trumpworld’s embrace of him is disgusting and wrong.” And yesterday, Ron DeSantis told the Tates they weren’t welcome in Florida.

I know this is not exactly a big ask: distancing from alleged rapists and human traffickers. But in the current cult-like climate, as the Trump peeps repeatedly huff their own methane, and the crazies appear to be pushing on countless open doors, it’s something. (I wish there had been similar liberal call-outs of left-extremists under Biden at the very start.) And it’s not the only sign of internal, conservative resistance to a reactionary, lawless populism.

. . .So let us now praise National Review, whose writers Ed Whelan, Andrew McCarthy, Charles CW Cooke, and executive editor Mark Antonio Wright have consistently called out Trump’s rhetorical assaults on core American values. [JAC: where’s Bret Stephens?] Substacker Richard Hanania has been on a roll as well, decrying the dumbness of the Muskovites: “Coming around to the idea that it’s all just stupidity. I can’t think of any obvious or 4d chess reason why you would stop funding biomedical research.” Me neither.

Among veterans on this lonely path: Jonah Goldberg, George Will, David Brooks, and David French (the latter somewhat defanged by being coopted as the NYT’s darling). And let’s also note Jack Goldsmith’s erudite deconstructions of Trump’s violations of even unitary executive theory, rightly understood.

. . . Other conservatives have been decrying the “woke right,” by which they mean those so caught up in their far-right bubble that they risk jeopardizing the entire project of restraining the left. Two honorable mentions: Bari Weiss’ speech at the ARC conference in London, raising alarm about Tate-like excesses; and James Lindsay, a constant wild card, who nonetheless sees the same groupthink, cultish behavior, and intolerance on the right that we saw on the woke left under Biden. Here’s Lindsay, for example, on Bannon’s kinda-Nazi salute:

Bari Weiss is not what I’d consider a conservative, though I don’t know where Lindsay places himself on the political spectrum (no, it’s not binary).  A bit more:

The WSJ, the highest quality right-of-center paper, has also been airing dissent on a regular, intelligent basis. Today alone, in a Trump symposium, you’ll find one regular columnist decrying the chaos of Musk’s appointment, another worrying about Trump’s military designs on Panama, another that, “under this administration, for better or worse, it’s not clear there is a script,” and another that the administration is opening “the Overton window in ways good and bad.” The paper openly campaigns against Trump’s tariffs. Its chief political columnist, Kimberley Strassel, wrote this week:

Trump, through his own narcissism and stupidity, is destroying whatever coalition he forged in November. Sullivan sees this as a watershed time for the GOP:

But this is the very beginning of the second-term roller-coaster ride, the moment when all doubts are supposed to be set aside by the faithful exulting in the honeymoon. And these small acts of conservative defiance matter. They are putting on record all of Trump’s overreach, in a manner unknown among dissident Democrats when Biden began his woke Kulturkampf. They keep the conservative tradition alive, even as most of the GOP abandons it in favor of strongman, tech-bro authoritarianism. That’s something. And when in the future we begin to undo the madness of this moment, it will, unlike Trump’s derangement, age remarkably well.

*The oldest living Holocaust survivor has died at 113 (see also here; h/t Jez and Frau Katze). And Rose Girone has her own Wikipedia page. From the Guardian first:

Rose Girone, believed to be the oldest living Holocaust survivor and a strong advocate for sharing survivors’ stories, has died. She was 113.

She died on Monday in New York, accrding to the Claims Conference, a New York-based Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany.

“She just was a terrific lady,” her daughter, Reha Benicassa, said by phone on Friday. “Nothing was too hard. She wasn’t fearful. She was an adventurous person. She did well.”

Girone was born on 13 January 1912 in Janow, Poland. Her family moved to Hamburg, Germany, when she was six, she said in a filmed interview in 1996 with the USC Shoah Foundation.

When asked by the interviewer if she had any particular career plans before Adolf Hitler, she said that he “came in 1933 and then it was over for everybody”.

Girone was one of about 245,000 survivors still living across more than 90 countries, according to a study released by the Claims Conference last year. Their numbers are quickly dwindling, as most are very old and often of frail health, with a median age of 86.

From the NYT:

Rose Girone was eight months pregnant and living in Breslau, Germany, in 1938 when her husband was sent to the Buchenwald concentration camp. She secured passage to Shanghai, only to be forced to live in a bathroom in a Jewish ghetto for seven years. Once settled in the United States, she rented whatever she could find while supporting her daughter with knitting.

Despite the hardships, including two pandemics, Ms. Girone embraced life with urgent positivity and common sense. “Aren’t we lucky?” she would often say.

Ms. Girone was believed to be the oldest survivor of the Holocaust. She died at a nursing home in North Bellmore, N.Y., on Long Island, on Monday, her daughter and fellow survivor, Reha Bennicasa, said. She was 113.

Her secret to longevity was simple, she would say: dark chocolate and good children.

“Holocaust survivor” clearly means not somebody who survived a concentration camp (though we have some of them), but any Jew who lived through the period and lived in a country controlled by Nazis. I wonder if I’ll be alive when the last one dies (this won’t be too far from the last solder in WWII dying, either).

Here’s Rose Girone, a screenshot from The Algemeiner (a screenshot):

*Finally, let’s end the weekend by saying, as they say on NBC News, “there’s GOOD NEWS tonight.” This time it’s the rescue of a horse who fell through the ice into a freezing New York pond.

A horse that fell through the ice of an upstate New York pond was saved by rescuers who pulled together to free the animal from the frigid water.

Body-camera footage from responding officers shows the team of Saratoga Springs police and neighbors grunting and straining to pull Sly, a 1,300 pound (590 kilogram) horse, from a hole in the ice late Monday afternoon. Sly can be seen flailing his front legs while rescuers shout “One, two three, pull!” and “C’mon, baby. We got ya!”

Sly’s owner, Ali Ernst, said she noticed her three horses playing on the pond when she came home from work, which was not uncommon. But when she looked out again, the 22-year-old quarter horse had fallen through the ice.

Ernst made a series of calls for help as she ran to the hole in the ice, grabbed Sly’s halter to keep his head up and waited for help.

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports on two separate dramatic ice rescues in New York of a man and a horse.

“I was losing the battle to keep him above water alone,” she said in a phone interview Wednesday.

Officer Kyle Clinton arrived first and helped Ernst get Sly’s full head back up on the ice. They were soon joined by others, including two more officers, neighbors and family members.

Here’s the video. It reminds me of the old Jewish saying, “If you save one life, it’s as if you saved the world entire.” And they did—for this horse.  I never accepted the “ACAB” slogan, and this shows that it’s false.

Click on the “watch on YouTube” link.

 

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili has a good question:

Hili: I have a question.
A: What question?
Hili: Who is manufacturing the moral compasses?
In Polish:
Hili: Mam pytanie.
Ja: Jakie?
Hili: Kto produkuje busole moralne?

And a photo of the loving Szaron:

And from Berlin, Stupsi has a few words upon seeing a spider:

Stupsi:  “Es ist wieder kalt draußen. Dort sind wir von Feinden umgeben. Siehst Du meine neuen Freunde hier? Diese Spinnen sind Vorboten des Frühlings und sie geben mir Hoffnung.” (Translation: “It is cold outside. We are surrounded by enemies. Can you see my new friends here? These spiders are messengers of spring and they give me something to look forward to.”)

*******************

From Things With Faces, a sleepy eggplant:

From My Cat is an Asshole:

From The Dodo:

From Masih, another Iranian woman jailed for . . . SINGING:

From Luana. I’ll try to report on this paper within a day or two:

From Bryan, who says “… I’m simply captured by this performance. I have been singing it in my head the past week!  I gather – unexpectedly – that Just The Two Of Us on ukelele is a fad. I have not looked into that. I bet the clip you shared of McCartney on ukelele factors in the machine-learning that brought this up.”

From Malcolm, a fearless moggy:

From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I reposted,

2 March 1925 | A Polish Jewish girl, Jeannette Woda, was born in Siedlce. She lived in Paris.On 13 July 1942 she was deported to #Auschwitz. She did not survive.

Auschwitz Memorial (@auschwitzmemorial.bsky.social) 2025-03-02T03:00:13.819Z

Two tweets from Dr. Cobb. The first is from the Onion:

FBI Uncovers Al-Qaeda Plot To Just Sit Back And Enjoy Collapse Of United States

The Onion (@theonion.com) 2025-02-05T18:31:39.298Z

And it looks like most cats engage in ronronning:

The purr article on French Wikipedia has a chart that sorts cats into the groups "purrs," "uncertain," "probably purrs," and "no data"

depths of wikipedia (@depthsofwikipedia.bsky.social) 2025-02-05T04:29:59.688Z

Saturday: Hili dialogue

March 1, 2025 • 6:45 am

Welcome to shabbos for Jewish cats: it’s CaturSaturday,  2025, and March 1.  Here’s March from the illuminated manuscript the Très Riches Heures du Duc de Berry, produced in the second decade of the fifteenth century. Time for plowing and planting!

Limbourg brothers, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

It’s also National Pig Day, World Compliment Day, Beer Day in Iceland, The beginning of Ramadan, and National Peanut Butter Lover’s Day (note once again the misplaced apostrophe, implying that only a single lover of peanut butter is being honored.

Here’s a joke for World Compliment Day; pardon the misspelling:

A man goes into one of those Seattle fern bars and orders a drink. As he nurses his white wine, a peanut jumps out of the bowl on the table, runs up to him and says, “Nice turtleneck, buddy” and proceeds out the door.

“Whoa”, thinks the man with the wine.

A minute later, another goober runs by and yells, “Great haircut, pal!”, and strides out the door.

Enough!!

“Hey bartender”, calls out the patron, “What’s with these peanuts?”

“Oh, they’re complimentary snacks, sir”.

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the February 21 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*Trump had a meeting with Ukrainian President Zelensky in the White House yesterday, and it wasn’t pretty (article archived here). Trump wants Zelensky to lick his boots and abase his country because it got aid from America.

Tensions between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and President Trump burst into the open Friday in the Oval Office as the Ukrainian leader urged the U.S. not to trust Russian President Vladimir Putin and Trump responded that Kyiv needed to accept that it had a weak negotiating hand.

Ukraine had sought the meeting to line up U.S. support against Russian aggression, which it hoped to solidify with the signing of a mineral-rights deal later in the day.

But after a half-hour of a generally polite discussion, the tone of the session became testy as disagreements that typically occur behind closed doors spilled out into the open.

Zelensky sought to explain to Vice President JD Vance that Ukraine had signed a number of agreements with Russia that Moscow had subsequently broken.

Vance, and later Trump, said Zelensky hasn’t been grateful enough for the assistance his military received from the U.S.

“If you didn’t have our military equipment,” Ukraine would have lost in the war in weeks, Trump said. He added: “You have to be thankful.” At one point, Trump told Zelensky he is “gambling with World War III.”

Zelensky said he has been thankful to the American people. But as the tense exchange continued, Trump provided a dire picture of Ukraine’s military situation. “You are running low on soldiers,” Trump said. “You’re not in a good position…you don’t have the cards.”

Vance participated in the humiliation, too. From the WaPo:

But Trump has been skeptical of his Ukrainian counterpart, calling him a “dictator” last week and blaming Ukraine for the war even though it began with an unprovoked invasion by Moscow.

“You’re in no position to dictate what we’re going to feel,” Trump said at one point in the Oval Office. “You don’t have the cards right now.”

Vice President JD Vance also chimed in, saying that it was “disrespectful for Zelensky to come into the Oval Office, litigating in front of the American media.”

“Have you said thank you once?” Vance asked.

But the best way to gras[ this debacle is to watch this ten-minute a video of the meeting (it was a press conference preceding a meeting that didn’t occur). Trump comes off as a total jerk. Vance doesn’t look well, either, and Zelensky looks very uncomfortable.

Even as the back-and-forth grew more heated, Trump said he wanted the American people to see the exchange.  To read an analysis of this debacle, read the Free Press articke, “A fiasco in the Oval Office.”  Zelensky was summarily kicked out of the White House without even a closed-door meeting:

Before dismissing the press corps and kicking Zelensky out of the White House, Trump observed that the last 40 minutes had made for some “great television.”

It certainly had. And that’s the only good thing one can say about the entire meeting.

One image of Ukraine’s ambassador to Washington with her head in her hands captures the entire debacle.

*The NYT has an editorial-board op-ed on how the Trump administration is controlling speech (article archived here). Here are a few examples, and there are more, including government posts with the “wrong” gender ideology, including deep-sixing words like “diverse”.

The Orwellian nature of this approach is deliberate and dangerous. This posture is not about protecting free speech. It is about prioritizing far-right ideology — and at times celebrating lies and hate speech under the guise of preventing the criminalization of language — while trying to silence independent thought, inconvenient truths and voices of dissent.

Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter  Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning. 

When Mr. Trump announced that he was changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, for example, it seemed to be an essentially harmless bit of nationalistic chest-puffery, paling in comparison with the real damage he intended to do to national security, public health, the Civil Service and the rule of law. But then he made it clear that compliance was mandatory.

This month, a reporter for The Associated Press showed up at an Oval Office event and was barred from entering because the news organization continued referring to the gulf by the internationally recognized name it has had since at least the 16th century. That was an editorial decision that The A.P., just like The Times and many other outlets, has every right to make on its own without government interference.

The White House press office then upped the ante; it is now keeping both A.P. reporters and photographers away from many press events and off Air Force One on presidential trips, making it far more difficult for the nation’s largest wire service to provide essential coverage. The A.P., to its great credit, has sued officials in the administration, saying it was doing so “to vindicate its rights to the editorial independence guaranteed by the United States Constitution and to prevent the executive branch from coercing journalists to report the news using only government-approved language.”

Federal District Judge Trevor McFadden has yet to rule on The A.P.’s request but made it clear that the White House appeared to be improperly punishing the wire service for its editorial decision. “It seems pretty clearly viewpoint discrimination,” the judge said at a preliminary hearing.

This struggle is obviously about more than the name of a body of water; the White House wants to use coercion to control how it is covered and even who gets to cover the president. On Tuesday the press office said it would begin handpicking the news organizations that cover Mr. Trump as part of the press pool — a decision that up to now was made by a group representing the news outlets themselves. The White House immediately cut Reuters and HuffPost from the pool and added two sycophantic outlets, Newsmax and The Blaze.

“The White House press pool exists to serve the public, not the presidency,” said Bruce Brown, the executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Politicians are allowed to criticize the press — that is free speech, too, and there is nothing new about it — but there is a difference between using language and using muscle. Government officials are supposed to use their considerable regulatory powers for the benefit of the public, not for personal or partisan goals. This administration, however, is mustering the arms of government to suppress speech it doesn’t like and compel words and ideas it prefers. It sees the press not as an institution with an explicit constitutional privilege but as a barrier to overcome, like an inspector general or a freethinking Republican senator. Members of Congress can be targeted for primaries, and inspectors general can be fired; under the same mentality, reporters need to be excluded and their bosses subjected to litigation.

The worst part, in my view, is Trump’s attempts to control the press by reducing the privileges of media that criticize the administration, threatening to sue reporters, and trying to muzzle speech like AOC’s seminar to apprise immigrants of their rights (this is NOT illegal).  And that kind of stuff is truly Orwellian.

*As usual, I’ll post a few items from Nellie Bowles’s weekly news summary at the Free Press: “TGIF: Gold Bars, Gold Stars, Gold Cards.

You’ve surely seen this (for one thing, I posted it):

→ TrumpGaza: Our President this week posted an AI-generated video of what Gaza might look like in the future as an American colony, and I cannot describe how unhinged it is. Lyrics include: “No more tunnels, no more fear. TrumpGaza is finally here. TrumpGaza shining bright, golden future, a brand-new light.” There are dancing bearded women on the beach. There are golden Trump balloons, and shots of a suspiciously chiseled Elon eating vats of hummus. You just have to watch it to understand the level of freak emanating from America’s capital. Here’s a good link.

Here: I’ll save you the trouble of clicking:

→ Lost in translation: A BBC documentary titled Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone had a lot of problems, but one is that they didn’t actually tell viewers what Palestinians were saying. The British broadcaster mistranslated or just left out any Palestinians’ references to the Jews or praise of jihad. The word Yahud, Arabic for Jew—and it also kinda sounds like it already—was changed to Israel or Israeli forces. A Palestinian’s praise of Yahya Sinwar’s “jihad against the Jews” was translated as Sinwar’s fighting “Israeli forces.” Watch this side-by-side. It’s a pretty perfect example of how Hamas’s war to eliminate Israel and expel all Jews from the Middle East is whitewashed into a gentle call for better military ethics. A call for an end to the military-industrial complex.

About that one, reader Jez found the “apology”: “The BBC has finally put out a statement on the dire documentary about Gaza narrated by the son on a Hamas official.” Have a look. Jez added, “When I tried to search the BBC website to find the statement using its full title, it didn’t come up, but ironically a link to a BBC Verify video called ‘Israel-Gaza war: How to spot fake news on social media”‘did. You couldn’t make it up – although apparently they did their best to…!”

And this one is absolutely true:

→ Mayor Johnson’s astonishingly low favorability: Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson is “overwhelmingly unpopular,” per a new poll. Fully 80 percent of voters disapprove of Johnson. And—this is incredible—only 6.6 percent hold a favorable view of the mayor. The same poll found that 67 percent of Chicago voters feel crime is the most important issue the city is facing. Brandon Johnson is a 2020-style mayor meeting the year 2025.

Johnson’s a goner, and Nellie’s last line is absolutely  correct.

*As I predicted, the protestors who had a sit-in at Barnard, injuring an employee, were not punished at all. They were protesting the expulsion of two students for disrupting a class on the history of Israel (bolding is mine):

Chanting “there is only one solution, intifada revolution” and beating drums, the students began their sit-in. Their demands included the immediate reversal of the student suspensions and amnesty for all other students disciplined for pro-Palestinian activism. They also requested a public meeting with Dean Grinage, who they said could decide on appeals of the student suspensions, and with President Rosenbury.

“Disruption until Divestment, Resistance Until Return, Agitation until Amnesty,” Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine, a banned group on campus, posted on X with images of the sit-in. “We will not stop until our demands are met.”

After several hours, a faculty intermediary, Kristina Milnor, the chair of the Barnard classics department, told the students that Dean Grinage had offered to meet with up to three protesters, but only if they came in unmasked and showed identification, according to video posted by the protesters.

The students rejected the terms. President Rosenbury was in Florida, Professor Milnor told the students.

About 8:30 p.m., Robin Levine, a Barnard spokeswoman, issued a statement saying that if the students did not agree to leave the building by 9:30 p.m., “Barnard will be forced to consider additional, necessary measures to protect our campus.”

She said that the college did not know if all of the protesters were Barnard students, and that there had been violence entering the hall.

“We have made multiple good-faith efforts to de-escalate. Barnard leadership offered to meet with the protesters — just as we meet with all members of our community — on one simple condition: remove their masks. They refused. We have also offered mediation,” Ms. Levine said in the statement.

The deadline was relayed to the protesters by another faculty member, who told them they had an hour more to talk, before officers from the Police Department might come. Several students were seen escaping out a first-floor window as the deadline came and went.

At 10:40 p.m., the protesters, chanting and beating a drum, marched out peacefully. At least nine Police Department vans were parked on Riverside Drive near the campus about 10 p.m.

Here’s a news video:

The students were part of Students for Justice in Palestine. The fact that these students suffered no punishment, even attacking someone and sending him to the hospital, is shameful.  Very few campuses seem to levy any punishment on students who break the rules about protesting.

*I recently reported that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) banned the participation of transgender athletes in women’s sports, following an EO from Trump threatening loss of federal funding to institutions that didn’t enact such a ban (see also this report from the NYT). Regardless of what you think of Trump, I see the NCAA as having promoted more fairness in women’s sports.  Unfortunately, Colin Wright, in a new Substack post, tells us that we shouldn’t be so optimistic: the NCAA policy, says Wright, is a “Trojan horse” that can be circumvented by using several loopholes.

While the new policy might seem reasonable at a glance, a closer look reveals a giant loophole that could be used to defy the clear intent of Trump’s executive order. In fact, the updated protocols could make it easier for males to compete in women’s sports.

The NCAA’s policy has several troubling features. First, it deliberately avoids referencing objective biology, and defines “woman” as a “gender identity” rather than as an “adult human female”—the language of the executive order. Further, it defines “gender identity” circularly as “an individual’s own internal sense of their gender.”

Second, though the policy states that “a student-athlete assigned male at birth may not compete on a women’s team,” and that eligibility will be determined based on the sex “marked on [the athlete’s] birth records,” this standard is easily manipulated. In rare cases, though more commonly in developing countries, doctors may misidentify a male newborn’s sex due to female-like or ambiguous genitalia caused by a developmental condition. The NCAA’s policy does nothing to keep such misclassified males out of women’s sports. Just this summer, a loophole of this kind allowed two male athletes, Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-Ting, to compete as women and win gold medals in boxing at the 2024 Paris Olympics.

The larger issue, however, is that 44 U.S. states and many countries allow individuals to amend their birth certificates to reflect their self-declared “gender identity.” Progressive lawmakers are keenly aware of this loophole, which is why officials like Washington governor Bob Ferguson are expediting approval of their constituents’ birth-certificate-modification requests. In a recent X post, Ferguson stated, “[T]he Department of Health will now process all requests to change gender designation on birth certificates within three business days. Previously, there was as much as a 10 month wait.”

Since sex is a matter of objective biology, any policy aiming to maintain the integrity of women’s sports must incorporate an active screening process rooted in empirical reality. This could include a cheek swab (Barr body) test to verify an athlete’s sex chromosomes, or a direct test for the SRY gene, which determines male development. Simply relying on changeable birth certificates is not a viable solution.

And believe me, those loopholes will be used!  Changing birth certificates retroactively is not something I approve of, since biological sex is immutable. If one finds out that at birth one was declared a member of the wrong biological sex, well, then, changes can be made. But using self-identification on those certificates? Not something I favor.

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, the Queen is feeling neglected:

Hili: I don’t know what to do.
Andrzej: What about?
Hili: To get you to take more interest in me.
In Polish:
Hili: Nie wiem co mam zrobić.
Ja: Z czym?
Hili: Żebyś się mną więcej zajmował.

*******************

From Things with Faces, a snarky ice-cream bar:

From The Dodo; the Branch Manager and the Assistant Branch Manager:

From I Love Cats; isn’t it gorgeous?

Via Masih, an Iranian woman arrested for singing in public (she’s not wearing a hijab, either).

Yup, another institution of pro-Palestinian demonstrators, who violated campus rules at Bowdoin College, getting off scot-free:

It’s curious, but I never thought about this question before!

From my Twitter feed: Sister Rosetta Tharpe (195-1973), showing the gospel origins of rock and roll:

From Malcom: “Friends”:

From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I reposted:

A fifteen-year-old French Jewish boy died in the camp. He was one of a million Jews who died at Auschwitz (and of a total of 1.1 million people)

Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-03-01T11:09:40.525Z

One tweet from Matthew. He says it’s a bee, and the black bits are “pseudopupils”: part of the compound eye.

Plus the upper part of the labrum makes it look glum. Mind you, it probably is if it’s been paying any attention.

Matthew Cobb (@matthewcobb.bsky.social) 2025-02-05T21:23:13.150Z

Friday: Hili dialogue

February 28, 2025 • 6:45 am

Welcome to Friday, February 28, 2025: the last day of the month and National Chocolate Soufflé Day.  Here’s an easy one for two, using only four ingredients:

It’s also National Science Day, Global Scouse Day, celebrating Liverpudlinas (including the Beatles), and National Tooth Fairy Day.  Here’s a lesson in speaking Scouse:

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the February 28 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*Obituaries first: Actor Gene Hackman, his wife, and his dog were all found dead in their home in New Mexico.

Oscar-winning actor Gene Hackman and his wife, Betsy Arakawa, were found dead in their home in New Mexico along with their dog, the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office told CNN. He was 95.

Their causes of death have not been confirmed, but foul play is not suspected, Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office spokesperson Denise Womack-Avila told CNN on Thursday morning.

Deputies responded to a welfare check request at the home around 1:45 p.m. Wednesday and found Hackman, Arakawa and a dog deceased, Womack-Avila said. An investigation is ongoing, the sheriff’s office said. The gas company is assisting in the investigation, The Associated Press reported.

The welfare check was conducted after a neighbor called authorities, concerned about the couple’s well-being, CNN affiliate KOAT reported.

A search warrant shows that Hackman, his wife and their dog had been dead for some time, and the couple’s bodies were in different rooms when deputies found them during the wellness check, the AP reported.

Hackman was found dead Wednesday in a mudroom, and Arakawa was found dead in a bathroom next to a space heater. There was an open prescription bottle and pills scattered on the countertop near Arakawa, the AP reported.

Medical examiner’s reports with the final cause of death “generally take anywhere from 4-6 weeks to generate,” said Chris Ramirez, spokesperson for the New Mexico medical investigator’s office.

Okay, no foul play, but the coincidence implies that it was a mass suicide. But why take the dog with you? There are ways to leave it alive—unless the dog was terminally ill or very old.  At any rate, I remember him well in The French Connectin, Scarecrow, and The Conversation. 

*Well, Trump decided to go ahead and raise tariffs on products from China, Mexico and Canada (the latter two were under a reprieve until now).

Tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico would go into effect on March 4 “as scheduled,” President Trump said on Thursday morning, claiming that those countries were still not doing enough to stop the flow of drugs into the United States.

China will also face an additional 10 percent tariff next week, on top of the 10 percent he imposed earlier this month, the president wrote in a post on Truth Social.

“Drugs are still pouring into our Country from Mexico and Canada at very high and unacceptable levels,” he said. “A large percentage of these Drugs, much of them in the form of Fentanyl, are made in, and supplied by, China.” He added that the levies were necessary until the flow of drugs “stops, or is seriously limited.”

In an effort to stem the flow of migrants and drugs, Mr. Trump threatened to impose tariffs on all products from Canada, Mexico and China in early February. But after Mexico and Canada promised measures like sending more troops to the border and, in the case of Canada, appointing a “fentanyl czar,” Mr. Trump paused their tariffs for one month.

He moved ahead with imposing a 10 percent tariff on all products from China, on top of those already in place, which prompted China to retaliate with its own tariffs on American goods.

Trump Says Canada and Mexico Tariffs Will Start March 4, Plus an Increase on China – The New York Times

Additional tariffs on the country’s three biggest trading partners would only add to the economic strain that has begun to emerge from Mr. Trump’s flurry of actions. And his threats have posed a particular quandary for Canadian officials, who argue that fentanyl made in Canada has not posed an increasing threat to the United States.

This is not good for anyone; it’s merely Trump’s form of retaliation. It might work as a threat, but not as a practice, for it raises the price of good for consumers in all these countries and angers our northern and southern allies.

*The NYT is so happy that Christianity’s disappearance in America is slowing: “One Nation Under God.” (The subtitle is “Americans have stopped leaving Christianity.  And the country is overwhelmingly spiritual, a new report found,”

As religion in America declined, experts administered last rites.

Churches were approaching “their twilight hour” as attendance fell, The Brookings Institution wrote in 2011. In his 2023 book, “Losing Our Religion,” the evangelical preacher Russell Moore asked: “Can American Christianity survive?”

The answer appears to be yes. People have stopped leaving churches en masse, according to a new study released this morning by Pew Research. America’s secularization is on pause for now, likely because of the pandemic and the country’s sustained spirituality. Most Americans — 92 percent of adults — say they hold one or more spiritual beliefs that Pew asked about:

The United States is an outlier compared with most other Western countries, which are far less religious. America’s persistent religious and spiritual curiosity is visible in its centers of power. In Washington, President Trump and JD Vance talk a lot about God in their quest to remake America. In Silicon Valley, tech billionaires — long obsessed with religion-adjacent projects like artificial intelligence, transhumanism and immortality — are warming to Christianity. In Hollywood, films and shows about faith, such as “Conclave,” the latest season of “The White Lotus” and “The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives,” have dominated streaming charts.

Below, I’ll explain why religion still has such a strong hold in America.

And a few years’ worth of statistics show that the rise of the “nones” (those who don’t identify with a particular denomination) has slowed:

Over the last 25 years, tens of millions of people left American religion. It was a major shift that affected how people voted, when they married and where they lived. Christianity took the hardest hit: Around 15 percent of American adults who once went to church stopped going. While some people switched to new faiths, many left religion altogether.

Experts called this phenomenon the “rise of the nones,” a group that includes atheists, agnostics and people who said in surveys that they identified with “nothing in particular.” The nones grew to include about 30 percent of the country.

But the rise of the nones has stopped, Pew found. People are no longer leaving churches en masse, and other major religions are growing, largely because of immigration.

And the proposed explanations:

Experts point to a few possible explanations.

First is the pandemic. Pew found that people turned to faith for support during those years, as the number of people going to religious services — either in person or virtually — remained consistent at about 40 percent. About a quarter of Americans even told Pew that the pandemic had strengthened their faith. “Religion was in their psychological tool kit for dealing with the hard times,” said Alan Cooperman, an author of the report.

The second explanation is that secularization has a limit in the United States.

Americans pray more often, are more likely to attend weekly religious services and value faith in their lives more than adults in other wealthy democracies like Canada, Australia and most European countries, Pew found in a separate study. Americans — both religious and not — also report high levels of spirituality: Eighty-three percent say they believe in God or a universal spirit, Pew found.

Ryan Burge, a political scientist, argues that most people who disagree with their religion on political or social issues — on Trumpism, abortion or gay marriage, for instance — have already left or switched faiths. “What’s left is like the bedrock of American religion, which is exceptionally large,” he said. The report reveals how many people remain committed to their religious traditions even after those defections.

The pandemic is a possible explanation, for religion tends to rise during bad times. But it’s bad times all over for the U.S.: consumer prices and house prices high, wages, low, etc. Americans are unhappy, and unhappiness is positively correlated with religious belief. I’m not sure that secularization has a limit in the U.S., and, in fact, I don’t believe it.  Why would there be a high lower threshhold of religious belief in the U.S. but not in Europe or other Western countries. Must 80% of Americans always have a “god-shaped hole” in their being.  Well, we’ll see over the next decade. Even if disbelief stops, that doesn’t mean that I won’t keep promoting it.

*I mentioned a few days ago that Hunter College, part of the City University of New York (CUNY), had advertised for a “Palestinian scholar,” using antisemitic terms for the job requirement. Now the position has been removed per order of governor Kathy Hochul. (The job ad was here, but is gone.)

New York governor Kathy Hochul took an unusual interest in the hiring practices of the City University of New York on Tuesday when she ordered the public system to take down a job posting for a professorship in Palestinian studies at Hunter College.

CUNY quickly complied, and faculty at Hunter are up in arms over what they call a brazen intrusion into academic affairs from a powerful state lawmaker.

The job posting was for “a historically grounded scholar who takes a critical lens to issues pertaining to Palestine including but not limited to: settler colonialism, genocide, human rights, apartheid, migration, climate and infrastructure devastation, health, race, gender, and sexuality.”

“We are open to diverse theoretical and methodological approaches,” the posting continued.

In a statement Tuesday night, Hochul said the posting’s use of the words “settler colonialism,” “genocide” and “apartheid” amounted to antisemitic attacks and ordered CUNY to “immediately remove” the posting.

A few hours later, CUNY complied, and system chancellor Félix Matos Rodríguez echoed Hochul’s criticisms of the posting.

“We find this language divisive, polarizing and inappropriate and strongly agree with Governor Hochul’s direction to remove this posting, which we have ensured Hunter College has since done,” he wrote in a statement.

Hochul also directed the university system to launch an investigation at Hunter “to ensure that antisemitic theories are not promoted in the classroom.” Matos Rodríguez appeared to imply the system would follow that order as well, saying, “CUNY will continue working with the Governor and other stakeholders to tackle antisemitism on our campuses.”

A CUNY spokesperson declined to say whether the system would launch a probe into the posting at Hunter but wrote in an email that “each college is responsible for its own faculty job posting.”

And of course faculty are pissed off:

Faculty at Hunter are livid about the decision, according to multiple professors who spoke with Inside Higher Ed both on the record and on background. They say it’s a concerning capitulation to political pressure from an institution they long believed to be staunchly independent.

Is this academic freedom, and Hochul’s order violates it? Well, it’s advertising for a professor who will propagandize his/her students against Jews, so it’s not a clear-cut violation. Teaching anti-Semitism, which is clearly what CUNY wants, is probably against the law.

*Speaking of bad behavior in Colleges, last night there was a big pro-Palestinian protest at Barnard College (infamous for this kind of stuff)

A small group of pro-Palestinian student demonstrators occupied a building at Barnard College’s Manhattan campus Wednesday, clashing with staff and sending one employee to the hospital.

The demonstration, organized by Columbia University Apartheid Divest, was part of a week of action demanding the reinstatement of two students expelled for disrupting an Israeli history course last month.

Nearly 100 students from Barnard and Columbia University – which is affiliated with Barnard and was a focal point of pro-Palestinian demonstrations last year – staged a sit-in at Barnard’s Milbank Hall, Columbia University Apartheid Divest said on social media.

Masked students, many of them wearing keffiyehs, a traditional Middle Eastern scarf often symbolizing Palestinian identity, sitting inside a hallway chanting, clapping and beating drums, videos posted to social media by Columbia University Apartheid Divest Wednesday showed.

The students “physically assaulted a Barnard employee, sending them to hospital,” a Barnard spokesperson told CNN.

Barnard security staff “harassed and shoved several students, knocking at least one to the ground,” Columbia University Apartheid Divest said on social media. CNN has reached out to the group for comment.

Vandalism, as usual. . .

Here are the students acting out and also deciding whether the Dean can go to the bathroom. Oy!

As far as I know, Barnard pretty much capitulated to the protestors. As I write this on Thursday afternoon, nobody seems to have been arrested or expelled.

*Finally, over on his Substack site, The Philosophy Garden, Massimo Pigliucci has part II of his defense of the sex binary and an attack on philosophical eliminativism (the idea that we should deep-six definitions of sex), “Let’s talk about (biological) sex—Part II.”

Watkins & DiMarco then go on to discuss more sophisticated philosophical accounts of sex, such as the “homeostatic property cluster” one. These are interesting, but get rather technical, and they don’t change the basic goal of their paper: the standard (i.e., gametic) definition of sex in evolutionary biology ought to be eliminated from scientific parlance because it is, in the authors’ view, “problematic” on multiple fronts.

Notwithstanding Watkins & DiMarco’s frequent “worries” (a standard locution in technical philosophy papers), biologists find the gametic definition of sex useful because it is causally and historically connected to other relevant biological properties, such as different morphologies, mating strategies, parenting behavior, and so on. As another philosopher, Paul Griffiths (quoted by the authors), puts it:

“The payoff for this way of thinking about sexes is that it helps to explain the evolution of reproductive systems and how they differ across the diversity of life.” (p. 8)

Addressing the issue of exceptions, Griffiths continues: “There are some species at the boundary between unicellular and multicellular life, such as some volvocine algae, which can be seen as representing transitional states in the evolution of distinct biological sexes and might be described as having more than two sexes. They produce slightly anisogamous gametes and in a range of sizes rather than two discrete types. But in complex multi-cellular organisms like plants and animals we find two very different kinds of gamete, each associated with a fundamentally different reproductive strategy, and so two biological sexes.” (p. 9)

This is an observation in search of an explanation, which is how biology (and science more broadly) works. Accordingly, evolutionary biologists have produced a large literature on the evolution of mating systems, a literature that includes theoretical models that are informed by, and attempt to explain, the available empirical evidence.

. . . . But this pluralism of concepts [about biological sex] and corresponding usages is not really a problem: the fundamental notion is the one used in evolutionary biology, because, as the famous evolutionist Theodosius Dobzhansky put it, nothing makes sense in biology except in the light of evolution. The other concepts of sex are pragmatically useful, but are, in an important sense, derivative with respect to the gametic one. The reason certain organisms have one type of chromosome rather than another, one hormonal profiles rather than another, or one external anatomy rather than another is that the evolutionary lineages to which those organisms belong have developed anisogamy, that is, gametes of different sizes and function.

Watkins & DiMarco recognize this when they write: “While promising and worthy of further inquiry, [the gametic] account prioritizes a subset of biologists’ interests in anisogamy; namely, evolutionary biologists.” (p. 13). As it should, because evolutionary biology is the biological discipline that unifies all the rest, just like Dobzhansky said. Once again, Griffiths is on the mark:

“The operational definitions of sexes used in biomedical fields all rely on the more fundamental definition that comes from evolutionary biology. … As with so much of biology, sex makes better sense when viewed in the light of evolution.” (p. 14)

political projects should have absolutely nothing to do with scientific ones, because to do so is to pervert science and bend it to political and ideological aims. If scientists claim that concept X does important work within the context of their theories, then this is prima facie evidence that X does do such work. Philosophers are most certainly entitled to level criticisms to whatever scientists say or do, but the burden of proof is high and on the side of the philosophers. So there is no contradiction between preserving a critical role for philosophy of science and being very careful before taking a strong prescriptive role toward the activities of scientists. As for the people affected—in this case transgender and non-binary persons—they most certainly ought to have a saying, but in the court of public opinion, during legislative debates, and in courts of law. Most definitely not in scientific laboratories.

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is worried about the grocery shopping:

Hili: Are you going to the shop?
A: Yes.
Hili: Have you checked what I’m lacking?
In Polish:
Hili: Idziesz do sklepu?
Ja: Tak.
Hili: Sprawdziłeś czego mi brakuje?

*******************

From Emma Hilton, a lesson for those who willfully tout the claim that sex is a spectrum. This, for example, could be a post-menopausal woman:

From My Cat is an Asshole:

From America’s Cultural Decline Into Idiocy:

No Masih today, but here’s an Iranian-German entrepreneur celebrating (or rather dissing) No Hijab Day on Feb. 1:

From Bryan; the incomparable Fred Astaire dancing and playing the drums at the same time:

And a tweet from Emma demonstrating that sports bans on transgender athletes goes both ways:

From Simon, but I think the last panel is misleading:

RNA xkcd.com/3056

Randall Munroe (@xkcd.com) 2025-02-26T14:58:54.736Z

From my feed on Twitter:

Kitty train!

From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I retweeted:

This Polish tailor lived but five days after arriving at Auschwitz. He died at 49.

Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-02-28T10:31:06.654Z

And from Malcolm, a clever cat elevator:

Matthew will return in a few days.

Thursday: Hili dialogue

February 27, 2025 • 6:45 am

Welcome to Thursday, February 27, 2025. and National Toast Day,  Wikipedia has a whole article on toast, which includes this helpful photo of the effect of toasting on bread, captioned, “The same slice of bread, pre-toasting, and post-toasting.” Amazing! It shrank!

By Rainer Zenz, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the February 27 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*Trump had his first meeting with his full cabinet, and of course Elon Musk was there and domineering. Apparently Musk shared the stage with Trump, with Trump strongly defending the gazillionaire:

President Trump defended billionaire adviser Elon Musk on Wednesday and raised the possibility that some of the more than one million federal workers who didn’t respond to an email asking what they accomplished last week could be fired.

“Those people are on the bubble, as they say, maybe they’re going to be gone,” Trump said at the White House in the first cabinet meeting of his new term. The president also said that some of the people who didn’t respond may be dead or don’t exist. The White House said that one million workers responded to the email, or more than 40% of the federal workforce of roughly 2.3 million.

Musk, who is running the administration’s Department of Government Efficiency cost-cutting initiative, said he is confident he can find $1 trillion in savings across the government’s roughly $7 trillion in annual spending, or a cut of 15%.

Trump praised Musk’s efforts and asked his cabinet if anyone was dissatisfied with Musk’s efforts. No one responded.

“Some disagree a little bit, but I will tell you, for the most part, I think everyone’s not only happy, they’re thrilled,” Trump said. He added later, addressing his cabinet, “Is anyone unhappy with Elon? If you are, we’ll throw them out of here.”

Lots of Republicans are unhappy with Elon, though I don’t know if any are in the cabinet.  Here’s a chart of Trump (and Biden’s) approval ratings over time from Reuters; Trump’s is falling but has never been higher than about 48%

*Trouble coming down the pike: the WSJ reports that Iran has enriched enough uranium to fuel six nuclear weapons.

Iran has sharply increased its stockpile of highly enriched uranium in recent weeks, according to a confidential United Nations report, as Tehran amasses a critical raw material for atomic weapons.

The increase in Iran’s holdings of uranium enriched to 60%, or nearly weapons grade, would be enough to produce six nuclear weapons.

Iran is now producing enough fissile material in a month for one nuclear weapon, according to the report, which was reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

Tehran’s strides come as the country has indicated an openness to negotiating with the U.S. on limits to its nuclear ambitions. The Trump administration has said it would return to a policy of “maximum pressure” on Iran but that President Trump also wants to negotiate a nuclear deal.

The U.N. report said Tehran had amassed around 275 kilograms of 60% highly enriched uranium as of Feb. 8, up from 182 kilograms in late October. That is a 50% jump in 15 weeks. The fuel could be converted to 90% weapons-grade material in days.

Now this doesn’t mean that Iran has the bomb, as it doesn’t (yet), nor a delivery system, but I don’t believe the country is “open to negotiating with the U.S.”.  They want their bombs badly. However, there are other reports that Iran is on alert because it expects a joint U.S./Israel air strike. From the Torygraph:

Iran has put its defence systems around its nuclear sites on high alert amid fears of an attack by Israel and the US, The Telegraph has learnt.

According to two high-level government sources, the Islamic Republic has also been bolstering defences around key nuclear and missile sites, which include the deployment of additional air defence system launchers.

Officials say the measures are in response to growing concerns of potential joint military action by Israel and the United States.

It follows warnings from US intelligence to both the Biden and Trump administrations that Israel would likely target key Iranian nuclear sites this year.

“They [Iranian authorities] are just waiting for the attack and are anticipating it every night and everything has been on high alert – even in sites that no one knows about,” one source told The Telegraph.

My understanding was that Iran’s nuclear facilities were buried so far underground that they were inaccessible to any foreign strike. However, the Israelis did kill the chief of Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, who was sequestered deep underground.

*One of the two Muslim nurses in Australia who threatened to kill Israeli patients (and indeed, said they had done so before) has been arrested (h/t Jay).  Both had already been fired, for threatening patients is a violation of the code of ethics for nurses. Apparently it’s also a violation of the law. (I presume “stood down” means “fired” in AussieSpeak). The report. from ABC.net, is a bit repetitive:

A Sydney nurse stood down over a video posted to social media where she claimed she would refuse to treat Israeli patients has been charged by police.

Sarah Abu Lebdeh, 26, was charged with threaten violence to group, use carriage service to threaten to kill and use carriage service to menace/harass/offend.

Ms Abu Lebdeh was granted conditional bail and will appear in the Downing Centre Local Court on March 19.

A Sydney nurse is not allowed to leave the country or use social media after being charged over a video which showed her threatening harm to Israeli patients.

Sarah Abu Lebdeh, 26, was arrested on Tuesday night at Sutherland Police Station.

She was charged with three commonwealth offences of threaten violence to group, use carriage service to threaten to kill and use carriage service to menace/harass/offend.

The video showed Ms Abu Lebdeh and fellow Bankstown Hospital worker Ahmad Rashad Nadir bragging about refusing to treat Israeli patients, killing them, and saying they would go to hell.

The filmed conversation took place on cam chat app Chatruletka.

The two had been stood down pending an investigation.

NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb on Wednesday afternoon said Ms Abu Lebdeh had been charged with three “very, very serious” charges.

“She is on very, very strict bail conditions, namely prohibiting her from going to a point of departure from Australia, but more importantly, banned from using social media,” Commissioner Webb said.

. . .Commissioner Webb said detectives had worked tirelessly to gather evidence from overseas within 13 days.

“I don’t think I would have ever imagined that an investigation of that complexity, across the other side of the world, would be done in such a short time,” she said.

Commissioner Webb confirmed on ABC Radio Sydney police had found no evidence that anyone at the hospital had been harmed but said NSW Health was continuing its own investigation.

Here’s the video, embedded in a news report. At least these nurses didn’t actually hurt any patients:

*Three-quarters of the Bibas family were buried today kfir near the kibbutz where Hamas abducted Shiri, her two sons, and the father, who was released by Hamas. Shiri’s parents were both killed as well on October 7.

Shiri Bibas and her two young sons, Ariel and baby Kfir, who were abducted by terrorists to the Gaza Strip and then murdered there, were buried together Wednesday in a single casket, mother and children wrapped in an eternal embrace, at their joint funeral.

They were buried at Tsoher Cemetery, near the home in Kibbutz Nir Oz, from which they were seized on October 7, 2023.

“They will remain together and close, just as Shiri enveloped the children, always, including on that accursed day,” said Carmit Palty Katzir, who acted as MC at the funeral.

The moving live funeral of Sheri, Ariel, and Kfir is below, and Tom Gross describes a few of the eulogies:

Yarden Bibas, who was released alive earlier this month following months of torture by Hamas, eulogizes his wife and children at their funeral today, supported by his sister Ofri at his side:

“Ariel, I hope you’re not angry with me for failing to protect you. I hope you know I thought about you every day, every minute.

“Kfir, I love you the most in the world. I have so many more things to tell you all, but I’ll save them for when we’re alone.”

From the AP:

People lined up on the side of the roads as far as the eye could see, sobbing and embracing each other as the casket made their way along the 100-kilometer (60 miles) route from central Israel to the cemetery.

Hundreds of motorcycles, each with an Israeli flag and orange ribbons, rode solemnly behind the convoy. In the city of Tel Aviv, thousands gathered to watch a broadcast of the eulogies, many dressed in orange.

Kfir was the youngest of about 30 children taken hostage. The infant, with red hair and a toothless smile, quickly became well-known across Israel. His ordeal was raised by Israeli leaders on podiums around the world.

The extended Bibas family has been active at protests, branding the color orange as the symbol of their fight for the “ginger babies.” They marked Kfir Bibas’ first birthday with a release of orange balloons and lobbied world leaders for support.

Below is the livestream, which you can sample if you’d like. I just opened to a random spot, which apparently was Sheri’s sister Dana Silberman weeping as she talked about her sister. (If you want to read Yarden Bibas’s moving eulogy for his wife, go here.) It’s all heartbreaking. All over the world, including Argentina (Shiri and her family had joint Argentinian/Israeli citizenship), there was mourningm often involving the color orange since both boys were redheads (orange balloons were released in Israel. Here’s a photo of Christ the Redeemer in Rio, lit up in orange (via Tom Gross):

And the live feed of the funeral. Clearly, the entire Jewish state had adopted the two babies as their own.

*Massimo Pigliucci and I have had our differences, but I have to say that I very much like his latest post on his Substack, The Philosophy Garden, called “Let’s talk about (biological) sex—part I”.

The story begins back in October of last year, when I was invited to give the opening keynote at the annual CSICon, the major conference of scientific skeptics, held in Las Vegas and organized by CSI, the Center for Skeptical Inquiry. (They publish Skeptical Inquirer magazine, for which I write. The former editor was a friend and esteemed colleague.) The title of my talk was “Why bother? The nature of pseudoscience, how to fight it, and why it matters.” I’ll publish an article based on it soon.

Shortly after me, my friend Steven Novella, of Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe fame and a neurologist by profession, got on the stage and delivered his talk, entitled “When skeptics disagree.” I found myself nodding along, except when Steven got to the “controversy” about biological sex. He said that biologists themselves disagree on the best definition of sex: does it have to do with chromosomes? Is it about anatomy? Behavior?

I immediately thought, uh-oh, here comes trouble! You see, I knew that one of the speakers slated for later on in the conference was my colleague Jerry Coyne, an evolutionary biologist and author of Why Evolution Is True. I expected Jerry to seriously disagree with Steven’s characterization of the “controversy.” And sure enough, he did.

Now, Jerry and I have at times not seen eye-to-eye about some matters, from technical issues concerning the nature of evolutionary theory to the roles of science and philosophy with respect to each other. But I thought in this case Jerry was right on target. Still, I let the matter go because of the policy explained above, and because CSICon is a friendly gathering where I’d rather have a nice conversation with fellow skeptics over martinis than fight yet another useless round of the culture wars.

Skip a few months ahead and a colleague of mine, a philosopher, sends me a paper just published in the prestigious journal Biology & Philosophy. The authors are Aja Watkins, of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Marina DiMarco, of Washington University in St. Louis. The title of their paper is “Sex eliminativism.” It is a highly technical, clearly written and very well argued paper. But it also is, I think, fundamentally flawed, and a good example of why some scientists really dislike philosophers.

Watkins and DiMarco maintain that biological sex does no useful work as a concept in science, which is wrong, but Massimo is going to argue more about that in Part II, which he says will be on the site tomorrow.

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili expresses General Disdain:

Andrzej: What are you doing?
Hili: I’m expressing a general aversion to everything.
In Polish:
Ja: Co ty robisz?
Hili: Wyrażam ogólną niechęć do wszystkiego.

*******************

From Things With Faces, a scary drink:

Another from Things with Faces; a happy cheese spread:

From The Dodo. I hope this cat got adopted!

Posted on Masih’s site. Translation of the first post. of the Australian senator Fatima Payman claiming that women are treated well in Iran:  “Masih Alinejad responds to Australian Senator Fatima Payman:’ The only thing that is ‘guaranteed’ to women under the Islamic Republic is systematic oppression. Your words erase the suffering of millions of Iranian women'” @AlinejadMasih

I hadn’t before seen this picture of Mahsa Amini dying in hospital.

Is this for real? It was apparently posted on Trump’s Truth Social site, but I haven’t looked for it, nor do I think I have access. Trump Gaza Hotel???

Crowds lining the roads in Israel on the way to the funeral of Shiri Bibas and her sons. This makes me tear up, especially with the sound on:

From Simon, who says, “What a moron (if true)”. I’m betting it is true!

This has to be one of the biggest opsec fails I've ever seen in my life. The actual director of the FBI driving around in the most conspicuous vehicle imaginable made even more so by it being neon red.

Alejandra Caraballo (@esqueer.net) 2025-02-25T21:36:24.853Z

From Malcom; a cat helping a duck! Be still my beating heart!

From my Twitter feed (no, it’s not all Nazis there); a fantastic proposal. Sound up!

From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I reposted:

A Czech couple gassed to death upon arriving in Auschwitz.

Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-02-27T10:35:18.466Z

A beautiful nudibranch from Matthew:

Got to visit one of my dad’s favorite spots from when he was in college – the tidepools at Dana Point – and found my first Spanish Shawl nudibranch 🥹🦑🐙🌿 #nudibranch

JA Fields | NonCompliantCyborg (@noncompliantcyborg.bsky.social) 2025-02-02T20:04:29.125Z

Wednesday: Hili dialogoue

February 26, 2025 • 6:45 am

Welcome to a Hump Day (“Yim Humpbe” in Kanuri) : it’s Wednesday, February 26, 2025, and National Pistachio Day.  I have a nice bag that was a Coynezaa gift from a reader, and, unusually all the nuts in the bag are open. But I’ve had more depressing experiences, when a fair number of nuts in the bag aren’t open and you have to either discard them or smash them (cracking with the teeth is a bad idea!)  This was Brit Kate Quilton‘s problem, and so she headed to California to understand the unopened nuts. Note the shaking machine that can harvest 10,000 nuts by shaking a tree for just three seconds.

It’s also a thin day for holidays: just Thermos Bottle Day and Levi Strauss Day (he was born on this day in 1829).

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the February 26 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

Breaking Nooz: The House passed a GOP budget plan last night.

The House on Tuesday narrowly passed a Republican budget resolution that calls for $4.5 trillion in tax cuts and a $2 trillion reduction in federal spending over a decade, clearing the way for major elements of President Trump’s domestic agenda.

The nearly party-line vote of 217 to 215 teed up a bitter fight within the G.O.P. over which federal programs to slash to partially finance a huge tax cut that would provide its biggest benefits to rich Americans.

It came after a head-spinning hour in which Republican leaders tried to put down a revolt among conservatives who wanted deeper spending cuts, failed to do so, canceled the budget vote and then reversed course minutes later and summoned lawmakers to call the roll.

*Trump is not having a good week as his popularity ratings are tanking, judges are blocking some of his orders (undocumented immigrants can no longer be plucked from Quaker churches), Republicans are squabbling over the budget, and there are big protests from American Republicans over the dismantling of government.  There are many articles, but here’s one about federal employees quitting rather than engage in the DOGE mishigass:

A group of 21 civil servants with technology expertise resigned on Tuesday rather than help implement an array of changes to the federal government being pushed by the billionaire Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency.

The government employees had worked for the U.S. Digital Service, a technology-focused unit housed in the executive branch, that had been rebranded by Mr. Musk and President Trump as the United States DOGE Service. The resignations pared the unit, which had already been reduced by layoffs, by roughly a third.

“We will not use our skills as technologists to compromise core government systems, jeopardize Americans’ sensitive data, or dismantle critical public services,” the resigning group wrote in a letter addressed to Susie Wiles, Mr. Trump’s chief of staff. “We will not lend our expertise to carry out or legitimize DOGE’s actions.”

The resignations, which were reported earlier by The Associated Press, come as Mr. Musk and his allies have begun to radically reshape the size and scope of the federal government, engaging in layoffsending contracts and attempting to shutter entire agencies. Most recently, Mr. Musk created confusion for millions of federal employees by issuing a directive ordering them to detail what they had worked on during the previous week as a condition of keeping their jobs. Several Trump appointees ordered employees at their agencies to ignore Mr. Musk’s directive, even as workers received contradictory information about whether they need to comply with it.

The mass resignation at the technology unit is the latest action being taken by federal workers to resist President Trump and Mr. Musk’s extreme overhaul of government. Other civil servants have engaged in public protests, filed lawsuits and even filmed staff members working for Mr. Musk’s team in an attempt to identify them.

Maybe Carville is right (see next piece); he recommends that Democrats stand aside and let Trump ruin the government before stepping up to take over.

*My favorite Democratic curmudgeon, James Carville, has a NYT op-ed called “The best thing Democrats can do in this moment.” First, the irascible Carville characterizes Republicsns:

The Republican Party is all too often effective at campaigning and winning elections, but there’s another fact about it that a lot of Americans forget: The Republican Party flat out sucks at governing. Even Tucker Carlson agrees with this. For all the huffing and puffing on the campaign trail in 2016, the first Trump administration largely amounted to tax cuts for the wealthy, 500 miles of a border wall and a destructive pandemic gone viral. George W. Bush got us into a harebrained war in Iraq and then tried to privatize Social Security while letting our financial system drive smack into the Great Recession. And George H.W. Bush governed his way into a one-term presidency because of the economy.

For round two in office, instead of prioritizing the problems he campaigned on — public safety, immigration and the border, and most of all the economy — President Trump is hellbent on dismantling the federal government. . . .

He then notes that, given the power balance, there’s nothing we Democrats can do to stop this. So Carville proffers a novel solution:

. . . . With no clear leader to voice our opposition and no control in any branch of government, it’s time for Democrats to embark on the most daring political maneuver in the history of our party: roll over and play dead. Allow the Republicans to crumble beneath their own weight, and make the American people miss us. Only until the Trump administration has spiraled into the low 40s or high 30s in public approval polling percentages should we make like a pack of hyenas and go for the jugular. Until then, I’m calling for a strategic political retreat.

The first test will come, says the Louisiana curmudgeon, when the GOP tries to pass a budget that raises the debt ceiling. What do we do? (See above; the budget passed and I haven’t heard Democratic reaction):

Already, many Democrats across the party are itching at their seams for a showdown. Instead of gearing up to fight them — as we love to do — the most radical thing we can do is nothing at all. Let the Republicans disagree with themselves publicly. Do not offer a single vote. Do not insert yourself into the discourse, do not throw a monkey wrench into the equation. Simply step away and let ‘em flirt with a default. Just when they’ve pushed themselves to the brink, and it appears they could collapse the global economy — come in and save the day. Be the competent party and not the chaos party. House Democrats know this; it’s time for everyone in our party — including the darlings who want to run in 2028 — to understand this as well. You won’t win or achieve anything meaningful going toe to toe with the Trump Administration right now.

. . . . This equation must be applied for the remainder of this year. Let the Republicans push for their tax cuts, their Medicaid cuts, their food stamp cuts. Give them all the rope they need. Then let dysfunction paralyze their House caucus and rupture their tiny majority. Let them reveal themselves as incapable of governing, and at the right moment, start making a coordinated, consistent argument about the need to protect Medicare, Medicaid, worker benefits and middle class pocketbooks. Let the Republicans crumble, let the American people see it, and wait until they need us to offer our support.

It’s a wiser approach than we pursued in the first Trump Administration, when Democrats tried and failed at the art of resistance politics.

It won’t take long: public support for this administration will fall through the floorboard. It’s already happening: Just over a month in, the president’s approval has already sunk underwater in two new polls. The people did not vote for the Department of Education to be obliterated — they voted for lower prices for eggs and milk. Democrats, let the Republicans’ own undertow drag them away.

The tide will turn, Carville says, in the November 2025 Virginia governor’s race.  Given that many fired federal workers live in that state, Carville says, “It looks set to be a resounding Republican defeat. This will be the first moment where we can take the offensive back and begin our crusade again.”  Well, perhaps.  I tend to like Carville, but remember that, while properly calling out the Democrats (his party) for wokeness, he also predicted that Kamala Harris would win.  I do agree that the best things that the Democrats can do is to play possum right now. This is good advice, but I think that many Democratic Congresspeople, seething with anger over the GOP victory, might not be able to effect this “strategic retreat.”

*This is pretty scandalous, but of course it’s the antisemitic BBC. The Free Press reports on a now-pulled documentary: “A BBC Documentary, Brought to You By Hamas.” (The subtitle is “How the British broadcaster made the terror group its silent partner in Gaza.”)

Abdullah Al-Yazouri, a 13-year-old boy living in the Gaza Strip, is a natural in front of the camera. In the BBC documentary, Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone, which first aired February 17, he and other youngsters guide viewers through wrecked buildings, rubble-strewn streets, and bloody, overflowing hospitals.

The film, which the network’s website proudly billed as a report on “four young people trying to survive the Israel-Hamas war as they hope for a ceasefire,” offers “a vivid and unflinching view of life in a warzone.” There are moments of levity, befitting a doc narrated by kids: We meet Renad, 10, who runs an online cooking channel on TikTok, conjuring up delicious dishes from whatever she and her sister can gather. Elsewhere, Rana, a young woman, has given birth prematurely to a baby girl.

For the most part, though, the film is grim—and some of the footage is disturbing. A surgeon tries to save the injured arm of a child on the operating table. Soon after, he passes the bloody, amputated limb to a colleague.

The message could not be clearer: Such is the horror inflicted by the Yehud—the Arabic word for Jew, which is spoken by Palestinians in the film, but sanitized in the BBC’s translation as Israeli, per the network’s long-standing practice.

Yet now it is the BBC that’s under fire over the documentary’s fishy sources and methods. It turns out that Al-Yazouri was anything but a random child-journalist. He is the son of Dr. Ayman Alyazouri, a deputy minister in the Hamas government. It took an investigation by David Collier, a British media researcher and activist who describes himself as “100 percent Zionist,” to bring this fact to light. Though obviously pertinent information, it was not disclosed to viewers.

The ensuing uproar extended across Britain’s political spectrum and forced the BBC first to issue a correction and then to remove the film from broadcast “for further due diligence.” Lisa Nandy, the Labour government’s culture secretary, has said she will demand answers about the film from BBC bosses. Kemi Badenoch, the leader of the Conservative opposition, has written a letter to Tim Davie, the beleaguered BBC director general, demanding “a full independent enquiry” into both the Gaza film and “wider allegations of systemic BBC bias against Israel.”

. . . Much of the problem, said Cohen, stems from the BBC’s Arabic language service, some of whose reporters are especially biased against Israel. Those attitudes then percolate into the main newsroom and influence coverage by the English services, he argues. In the five months following the October 7 attacks, the BBC Arabic Service made 80 corrections of its coverage, an average of one every other day. Thirty corrections were due to reports that described towns and communities inside Israel’s pre-1967 borders as “settlements.” On three occasions BBC Arabic described Hamas and Hezbollah—both designated terror groups under British law—as “the resistance,” according to a report by CAMERA, the pro-Israel media monitoring group. “BBC bosses absolutely know that there is a systemic problem of bias at BBC Arabic,” said Cohen, “but the fact that they have not admitted it is just pure gaslighting of the Jewish community.”

As the article points out, the Beeb has “Verify, a 60-journalist unit devoted to countering ‘disinformation’.” It flopped, and big time! As Malgorzata told me, she thinks the only Western MSM more antisemitic than the BBC is the Guardian.

*Another underwater cable serving Taiwan has been cut, and it isn’t the first one. It’s almost certain that this is a tactic that China is using to terrorize the island nation before they try to take it over (the target date, it’s rumored, is 2027). This time, though, the Taiwanese have detained the crew of a Chinese ship:

Taiwan detained a cargo ship and its eight Chinese crew members after an undersea fiber-optic cable was severed, in a stepped-up effort to police such incidents, which are often seen as part of China’s pressure campaign targeting the self-ruled island.

Taiwan’s coast guard said the incident was being handled as a national security matter and that deliberate sabotage hadn’t been ruled out. A string of such episodes has called attention to Taiwan’s vulnerability as it works to ensure that it has secure internet services to keep the island online in the event of an invasion or blockade by China.

Similar incidents elsewhere, including the cutting of data cables beneath the Baltic Sea, have brought global attention to security concerns surrounding the critical infrastructure.

Taiwan’s coast guard said it spotted the Togo-flagged cargo vessel in the area on Saturday evening. When it dropped anchor around 2:30 a.m. on Tuesday, the coast guard directed the ship to move away.

Within less than an hour, telecommunications provider Chunghwa Telecom reported that one of the undersea communications cables connecting Taiwan to its outlying islands and to nearby countries appeared to have been damaged by external forces. Internet services were largely unaffected, the Ministry of Digital Affairs said.

The coast guard escorted the vessel, identified as the Hong Tai, to a Taiwanese port for investigation.

China is engaged in a long-running campaign to pressure the people and leadership of Taiwan to give up their commitment to self-rule of the island, which is claimed by Beijing as its territory.

. . . Taiwan’s coast guard said that the ship was provisionally registered, crewed by Chinese nationals and backed by Chinese capital. “The possibility of China conducting gray zone harassment can’t be ruled out,” the coast guard said. In the past China has used tactics ranging from military drills that simulate a blockade of the island to cyberattacks and social-media campaigns, Taiwan authorities say.

Make no mistake about it: Beijing wants Taiwan, which it claims is part of the People’s Republic of China. And the Taiwanese won’t have any part of it.  There may be a war as China, heartened by Russia’s success in Ukraine, and noting Trump’s support of Russia, invades Taiwan.  That is going to be a bloody battle, but of course the Taiwanese will lose. The interesting thing will be to see whether the U.S. will help Taiwan in such a conflict.

*Bill Maher’s short (2 min) monologue this week is called “Hulk Smash”, about the dismantling of the government:

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is hunting indoors:

Hili: Theoretically there should be something interesting hidden here.
Andrzaj: It’s just a theory.
In Polish:
Hili: Teoretycznie tu powinno ukrywać się coś ciekawego.
Ja: To tylko teoria.

And a photo of the loving Szaron. It’s blurry but he is meowing:

*******************

From Now That’s Wild:

From Things With Faces, a ghoul at the bottom of your ice cream:

From Divy:

From Masih: a brave Iranian woman got arrested for removing not just her hijab, but also some of her clothes. World Hijab Day was on Feb. 1 and is best forgotten.

Yes, “progressivism” can make people sound stupid, if not actually become stupid. Here’s one:

From Bryan. This is amazing, and I’m assuming it’s real.  What a skill!

From Malgorzata, some non-humanitarian “humanitarian aid”, undoubtedly for Hamas:

From Malcolm, an adventurous kitten:

From my feed, “the cat came back” (sound up).

From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I reposted:

A Czech Jewish boy was imprisoned in the family camp at Birkenau, but did not survive. Nor did the Germans want him to. He was eleven.

Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-02-26T11:21:01.875Z

Two tweets from Matthew. First, his favorite planet, Mars, probably taken from the rover:

Saturday afternoon in Jezero Crater, Mars.

Paul Byrne (@theplanetaryguy.bsky.social) 2025-02-09T17:37:36.110Z

Matthew calls this one “more beautiful grimness”:

Whip spider (Paraphrynus laevifrons) covered with chloropid fly puparia. The parasitoid fly attacks the eggs carried by the female. When done, the maggots climb on the "childless" mom's back and pupate. She protects them during this period thanks to her motherly instincts.

Gil Wizen (@wizentrop.bsky.social) 2025-02-06T17:13:24.292Z