Even moar travels, food and drink

November 22, 2012 • 9:14 am

I am now in Edinburgh—cold, gray and rainy, and just the way I remembered it when I once lived here for five months (the worst five months for this town: November-April).  But I’m warmed by the memories of fine comestibles yesterday.

It was too rainy yesterday to essay our planned trip to Cambridge—a walking town—so we went instead to Oundle, a lovely old town that is home of a famous school. Here’s a bit of downtown Oundle:

And below is the Oundle School for well-heeled Brits. Tuition there is well above tuition at universities like Cambridge and Oggsford (the Oundle School is of course for younger students). It’s not quite in the class of Eton, but is up there, and was disgorging male students in coats and ties, and females in equally spiffy garb.

(UPDATE: A reader below has noted that this is where Richard Dawkins went to school. That was news to me.)

Observing Oundle is thirsty work, so we drove a few miles north to a fine pub, the Shuckburgh Arms in Southwick, with a thatched roof and a lovely fire. Another wonderful feature is that pints—good pints of real ale—are only two pounds each, all day and seven days a week!

Here’s what was on tap:

The two on the left are from a local brewery, Neen Valley (we visited it afterwards), and I had the BSA (Blond Session Ale), which was a wonderful pint.  I find myself shying away from very hoppy beers these days: American microbrews tend to be too hopped, perhaps since American brewers equate hops with quality, and I’ve been put off by overly bitter beers like Dogfish Head 90 Minute IPA. Give me a well-balanced session pint any day!

The menu was extensive, featuring local game (click to enlarge):

Guess what I had? (Answer below.) While waiting for lunch and quaffing a pint, I enjoyed another British tradition: PRIME MINISTER’S QUESTION TIME.  This occurs for half an hour each Wednesday, when all the members of the House of Commons get to fire questions at the Prime Minister. It’s very lively and also funny, as the members growl and make other low sounds, snickers, and noises of disapprobation during both the questions and answers. I’d like to see this in the U.S.:

(To my left is a wonderful fire in a nook underneath the beam.)

My lunch: partridge (with a potato cake, sauteed leeks, broccoli, and cauliflower). The publican told me that his father-in-law had shot the bird on his property. It was my first partridge! I tried to eat it with a knife and fork, but that was a bad business, and I finally picked it up and gnawed off the meat. The publican told me that was the way to do it!

It was a delicious bird, juicy but not gamey (I like gamey), and a substantial lunch. We then visited the very small Nene Valley brewery, talked to the brewmaster, and picked up a few bottles.

After that the rain worsened and we repaired home, later to consume a delicious homemade dinner of pasta shells with cheese, spinach, and tomato sauce, washed down with a bottle of Italian chardonnay (not shown) and a very fancy Valpolicella, which was inky black and brimming with raspberry fruit and hints of mint:

Because of the flooding yesterday, many roads were closed this morning and I barely made my train to Edinburgh. But I have arrived in Auld Reekie to speak to the local humanists—tomorrow evening. In the meantime I plan to visit the National Museum of Scotland and scrape up a pint or two and some local grub. I’ll be glad to receive suggestions for pubs in the center of town.

Details of my talk in Edinburgh are here.

Happy Thanksgiving!

November 22, 2012 • 8:13 am

I’m dining in Edinburgh this evening, so there’s scant chance of turkey, but that’s okay, for I’m going out to eat with the local humanists.  And for breakfast tomorrow at my B&B I have four options:

1. Scottish smoked salmon and scrambled egg (tempting, but inferior to #3):

2. Haggis with poached egg and potato scone (McSween’s Haggis, with minced beef and sans offal, is good, but that’s not on offer, so I’ll eschew this choice).

3. Traditional Fry (the one I will choose, of course), with my choice (any or all) of bacon, sausages, mushrooms, tomato, hash brown, baked beans, and either poached, scrambled, fried, or boiled eggs. The consumption of vile, canned baked beans for breakfast is a moral failing of many in the U.K. I can only surmise that many years ago, in the absence of real breakfast food, someone opened a can of beans, and since then it’s become a “tradition.”

4. Or I could have the Health Nuts’ Choice: continental breakfast.  That’s for weenies.

Happy Thanksgiving to everyone about to gorge in the U.S. Here’s a suggestion about what to be thankful for (and a biology lesson):

h/t: Julie

Science class in Louisiana, ctd.

November 21, 2012 • 9:55 pm

by Greg Mayer

In my previous post I noted that Zack Kopplin, at the time a Louisiana high school student and now a Rice University undergrad, has led efforts to repeal Louisiana’s creationist Science Education Act of 2008. Zack saw the post, and contacted Jerry, asking us here at WEIT to highlight some of the more recent and egregious actions of Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal. Zack has a post at his site with more details, but here are some of the lowlights. (By the way, Zack’s Facebook page is a more frequently updated account of developements on this front, and WEIT readers should follow there for the latest.) According to Zack,

My review of the Governor’s voucher program identifies at least 20 schools who use a creationist curriculum or blatantly promote creationism on their websites.  These 20 schools have been awarded 1,365 voucher slots and can receive as much as $11,602,500 in taxpayer money annually.

Among the most egregious is Northeast Baptist School, in West Monroe, which uses BJU Press science textbooks, one of which was highlighted in my previous post. Zack notes that the University of California won a lawsuit in 2010 that successfully defended its right to not accept high school credits from courses based on creationist textbooks. Faith Academy, in Gonzalez, has a student handbook that states that students must “defend creationism through evidence presented by the Bible verses traditional scientific theory.” (Their spelling is as bad as their science!) And taking the cake is Claiborne Christian School, also in West Monroe, where students are “taught to discern and refute lies commonly found in textbooks, college classrooms, and in the media”, and whose newsletter has approvingly cited the claim that scientists are “sinful men”. Each of these schools are eligible for hundreds of thousands of dollars of state support.

Gov. Jindal has recently gotten some good publicity for demanding that the Republicans “stop being the Stupid Party.” But as Newsweek’s John Avlon quickly noted, Jindal himself has presided over Louisiana’s plunge into creationism:

Marco Rubio said Earth’s age is a great mystery. Fellow rising star Bobby Jindal’s state teaches creationism alongside science. Both Republicans are preaching reform, but if they and others keep pivoting away from common-sense science, the GOP will remain the Stupid Party—and fail.

Jindal is promoting the “Stupid”, not preventing it.

Good luck to any student raised on this bilge trying to succeed in the 21st century. As the desperate Louisiana high school student pleaded to his science teacher, as the teacher explained creationism in the now classic Doonesbury comic, “Please stop. I’d like to get into a good college.”

Even moar fudz

November 21, 2012 • 11:06 am

Yesterday I left Oggsford for the wee village of Denton, where one of my oldest college chums lives with his English wife. But on the way we stopped for refreshment at The Three Conies in the village of Thorpe Mandeville, a pub with good beer, great food, and (important at this time of year) an open fire.

It’s tied to the Hook Norton Brewery, which is okay because Hook Norton makes fantastic beers. There’s a selection of four cask ales:

Sadly, they were out of Old Hooky, one of my favorite pints, but the Flagship was very good.

There’s nothing like a good pint, a plate of haddock and chips, and an open fire on a drizzly day:

For dinner at my friends’ there was an appetizer of shrimp, washed down with a fine Condrieu; and,with the main course (stuffed peppers), I was given a choice of four great red wines (below). It was a very tough decision. I love Cote Rotie (Rhones are the best), but there were two spectacular Portuguese wines as well as the 2001 Viña Ardanza from La Rioja Alta, one of the two or three best Riojas I’ve ever had (I’ve previously sampled only the 2004 vintage). Kudos to the person who guesses which one I chose!

After dinner I had the luxury of watching a live (televised) football match: Juventus played Chelsea in the Champions League.  For those of you who follow football, you’ll know that Chelsea had a miserable showing, losing 3-0 in Turin.  And, this morning, Chelsea fired its coach Roberto di Matteo, a serious mistake given what he did for Chelsea last year.  When Abramovich (the gazillionaire owner of Chelsea) finds a replacement, it will be the ninth manager of his team in nine years.

Pope embarrasses church again, says Catholics should accept the Virgin Birth

November 21, 2012 • 9:16 am

Well, we already knew this (I think), since that asseveration is part of the Nicene Creed, that litany of beliefs that should embarrass any thinking person. Still, it’s nice, at least for us atheists, that the Pope has once again made himself and Catholicism figures of fun by affirming that Jesus was born of a virgin. As Yahoo News (via Reuters) reports, the Pope has given us a Christmas gift: an affirmation of the impossible.

 Pope Benedict published the last part of his trilogy on the life of Jesus on Tuesday, delivering an early childhood narrative which strongly reaffirms the doctrine of the virgin birth as an “unequivocal” truth of faith.

In the book, 137 pages in its English version, Benedict also urges his readers to stop seeing God as someone who limits personal freedom.

“The Infancy Narratives – Jesus of Nazareth” will be published around the world in some 20 languages. It goes on sale on Wednesday.

It is bound to be another international bestseller like the previous volumes. The Vatican said a million copies had already been printed and more runs were expected soon.

Oy vey; would my books sell as well!

But here’s the good part:

One section of the book is called “Virgin Birth – Myth or Historical Truth?”

The Church teaches that Jesus is the son of God and was not conceived through sexual intercourse but by the power of the Holy Spirit, one part of the divine trinity.

Note that the Trinity is not an explicit claim of the New Testament, but a doctrine (now ironclad) made up by Church fathers from some questionable references in the New Testament. And it’s not accepted by many Christians (e.g. “Unitarians”, Christian Scientists, and Mormons). Once again, theology has just made something up.  But I digress:

In simple language that is at once academic but still easily accessible to a non-specialist readership, Benedict says the story of the virgin birth is not just a reworking of earlier Greek or Egyptian legends and archetypal concepts but something totally new in history.

“It is God’s creative word alone that brings about something new. Jesus, born of Mary is fully man and fully God, without confusion and without separation…” he writes.

“The accounts of Matthew and Luke are not myths taken a stage further. They are firmly rooted, in terms of their basic conception, in the biblical tradition of God the Creator and Redeemer,” he writes.

“Is what we profess in the Creed (a Christian prayer that includes belief in the virgin birth) true? he asks. He answers: “The answer is an unequivocal yes”.

Catholics should see belief in the virgin birth and the resurrection of Jesus from the dead as “cornerstones of faith” because they are undeniable signs of God’s creative power.

Yeah, but so are the creation, the Flood, Adam and Eve, Moses parting the Red Sea, and so on. Why aren’t those cornerstones of faith? Or are the resurrection and virgin birth “undeniable” for some reason that doesn’t apply to the other stuff?

“If God does not also have power over matter, then he simply is not God,” Benedict writes. “But he does have this power, and through the conception and resurrection of Jesus Christ he has ushered in a new creation.”

Is Pope Benedict a Biblical fundamentalist, then? We know that he isn’t, for he hasn’t overturned the Church’s doctrine of accepting evolution, a doctrine that blatantly contradicts Genesis. (I should note, that, that Ratzi’s book bears both his own name and his Popeish monicker, and thus doesn’t constitute official church doctrine.)

In fact, in his new Golden Book of Jebus, Ratzinger indeed suggests that parts of the Bible are metaphorical (he uses the euphemism “interpreted history”). The Yahoo story continues:

Benedict also tackles the “question of interpreted history,” or the attempt by the gospels to understand events after they took place in the context of the word of God and their relationship to prophesies in the Old Testament.

“Hence the aim (of the evangelists) was not to produce an exhaustive account, but a record of what seemed important for the nascent faith community in the light of the word. The infancy narratives are interpreted history, condensed and written down in accordance with the interpretation,” he writes.

In other sections of the book Benedict discusses the genealogy of Jesus, the figure of St Joseph, the story of the wise men who the Bible says paid tribute to the infant Jesus in the manger in Bethlehem.

He writes of the symbolism of Jesus having been born in a manger: “From the moment of his birth, he belongs outside the realm of what is important and powerful in worldly terms.”

The pope dedicates a section of the book to the Bible story of the three kings who paid tribute to the infant Jesus.

Benedict says that while he believes in the story of the adoration of the Magi, no foundation of faith would be shaken if turned out to be an invention based on a theological idea.

Well, that’s about as weaselly as it gets. First of all, why does he believe in the story of the adoration of the Magi? Just because it’s in the Bible? If that’s so, then does he believe everything in the Bible as literal truth? Certainly not, for he rejects the creation story.

Second, as has always been clear, the things that to Christians are non-negotiable “truths” of the Bible are those fables on which their faith rests most heavily. Therefore they can dispense with the parting of the Red Sea and the curing of lepers, buut not with the Resurrection, which is the most important fable that Christians must accept as literal truth.

But if that’s the case, then why not treat Adam and Eve likewise?. For without the Original Duo, and Original Sin, the crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus would make no sense (as they say, “Did Jesus die for a metaphor?”).

But I don’t see the Virgin Birth as such an unequivocal truth. Nothing really depends on that tale except the notion that Jesus was an extraordinary (i.e., divine) being.  And by holding fast to such a ludicrous doctrine, the Pope is making things tough for his Church, and harder for adherents to accept its doctrine in an age of science.

I’d like to ask devout Christians or Catholic scientists, like Kenneth Miller, Francis Collins, or Simon Conway Morris, if they too believe in the “unequivocal truth” of the virgin birth.  My guess would be that Collins and Conway Morris would equivocate, muttering something about metaphor, while Miller would refuse to answer.

h/t: Grania

How The Wasp Got Her Handle

November 21, 2012 • 3:44 am

By Matthew Cobb

No Kipling this time, but some science from the 1920s. After the Beetle Handle post went round Twitter, ‘Wikispecies Editor’ @stho002 (aka S. E . Thorpe) who’s based in Auckland NZ, tweeted about this amazing and very tiny parasitoid wasp, Inostemma boscii, which has a stupendous ‘handle’ arching above its thorax. As can be seen in this photo taken by Thorpe and posted on Wikispecies, the structure is so long that the wasp even has a groove in its head to make space for the handle:

File:Inostemma boscii.jpg

A clue as to what on earth this outgrowth might be – sadly, it’s not a handle – is given by the observation that this is a female wasp. The ‘handle’ in fact contains the ovipositor, which is curled up in the handle when it’s not in use.

Here’s a rather nice drawing of an I. boscii wasp in flight, taken from here. Notice the lack of veins in the wings, with the exception of that rather odd short ‘strut’ in the forewings:

The Wikispecies page for I. boscii  includes a reference to a 1927 paper in the Bulletin of Entomological Research by  Dr J G Myers of the steampunk-sounding ‘Imperial Bureau of Entomology’. (The Bureau was apparently later transformed into CABI, the Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International (yes I know it’s not grammatical).)

Myers begins his excellent paper thus:

In the summer of 1925 I was commissioned by the New Zealand Government Department of Agriculture to attend the Second Imperial Entomological Conference and afterwards to enquire in Europe into the possibilities of natural control for some nine primary pests of the Dominion. As the pear leaf-curling midge presented at the same time the most pressing and the most promising of these problems it was decided to make a personal study of this insect, as intensive as time would permit. The various natural enemies discovered having now been determined by the kindness of Dr. Ch. Ferriere, through the Imperial Bureau of Entomology, the biological data acquired are here published for the first time.

In other words, he had to explore potential predators on the pear leaf-curling midge in Europe, which might be introduced to deal with the (apparent) problems created by the Perrisia midge for New Zealand’s pear production. However, it turned out that the midge was not much present in Europe, and certainly wasn’t a pest for pear growers. (It appears that Inostemma boscii is currently particularly useful in controlling pests of oil-seed rape, whose bright yellow flowers mark the European countryside in springtime.)

Nevertheless, Myers went to France in the summer and was able to observe both pest and parasitoids of the Platygasterid family (Inostemma and Misocyclops). His description of the behaviour of Inostemma boscii is a good bit of natural history:

This energetic little black wasp was first observed at Versailles on 16th July, when it was ovipositing during hot and brilliant sunshine in the eggs of PerrisiaMisocyclops was busy at the same time, as were also the midges themselves. The two Platygasterids were in the proportion of perhaps one to every eight midges, while among themselves the two species seemed in about equal numbers. On most subsequent occasions, however, and especially towards the middle of August, the Misocyclops was much the more abundant. Both species were observed on such of the intervening dates as the weather permitted. Inostemma takes from half a minute to more usually a minute for each oviposition. This is much slower than Misocyclops, but much quicker than I. piricola of the pearfruit midge, which Marchal (1907) found to require a quarter or half an hour or even longer. The long period is probably associated with the much longer ovipositor in Inostemma than in the other genus, and this in its turn with the extraordinary dorsal horn which sheathes the ovipositor and renders Inostemma  unique among insects.

“Unique among insects”! I’ll say! Some close observation revealed how the female Inostemma gets to work:

Before beginning oviposition Inostemma boscii  explores assiduously, burrowing in between the leaf buds and under the matted hairs which clothe them. While both Inostemma and Misocyclops  exploit the eggs in the young buds—the usual laying-place of the midge — Inostemma  is often seen also on the older leaves, which have begun to unroll along the midrib, but are curling more tightly on the margins as a result of midge attack. In such situations I never saw Misocyclops.

When Inostemma oviposits, as soon as the tip of the abdomen touches the point of application, the dorsal horn, which has been lying closely appressed to the dorsum of the thorax, so as to be almost invisible to the naked eye, and to the lens appearing as a mere ridge, jerks violently upwards and retains this position during the act, with a wide space between its apex and the pronotum. It is then easily visible to the unaided eye.

The next bit is particularly intriguing, as the parasitoid targets the midge maggot’s brain, and either lays only one egg, or only one survives:

this Inostemma apparently always oviposits in the embryonic tissue which will later form the brain of the larval midge. But in spite of repeated examinations I was not able to discover the egg until considerable development had taken place. Even then it was by no means easy to distinguish, but by dint of examining many hundreds of larvae I eventually found eggs in one or other of the lobes of the supra-oesophageal ganglion. This examination was carried out day after day, but in no case was the Inostemma embryo found to have passed the blastula stage. All stages up to this were encysted in the brain, the egg having increased greatly in size (fig. 1). In the case of I. piricola Marchal found several more often than one in the same brain, but in the present species not one larva, of the hundreds examined, showed more than one such encysted egg. I think this is a constant difference; but the final result is the same in the two species, since only one I. piricola survives in each host larva.

Here is Figure 1 – the maggot’s noses (my favourite subject) are the two horn-like structures on the right. The shaded comma-shaped blobs to the left are its mouth hooks. The encysted egg is circular structure on the left, I think.

The final bit is pretty gruesome, in classic parasitoid fashion, and is reminiscent of “Alien,” for the larva hatches from the brain and makes its way through the body of the midge maggot, using its ‘huge curved mandibles’ (yikes!) as it goes:

At last, on 12th August, a midge larva was obtained with the cerebral cyst of Inostemma greatly enlarged and containing a larva at the primary or cyclopoid stage rendered familiar by Marchal’s work. The next day the cyst burst and the cyclopoid larva wandered into the body cavity. Even before the larva emerged from the cyst the huge curved mandibles were seen to work vigorously. Occasionally one would be opened completely so that its apex was outside the outline of the body, while the other was shut like the blade of a clasp knife. By the time the larva was mounted, 24 hours after discovery, it appeared to be ensconced in the gut of the host.

Here is Figure 2, showing the mandibles of I. boscii:

Can nothing stop this terrifying parasitoid? Myers concludes that I boscii seems pretty dominant, with no parasitoids attacking it (‘hyperparasites’), and its only predator being a ‘small spider’:

To sum up the life-history data, it seems that oviposition may occur at almost any time from the middle of July to the middle of August, but that development has apparently proceeded no further than the primary larva by the latter date. This would suggest that the later stages are passed in the wintering larvae of the host; but such an explanation is open to many objections. On the other hand it is almost impossible that I could have missed seeing the older larvae of Inostemma had they been present in my material, since I had learned to detect with facility the much less conspicuous early stages.

No signs of hyperparasites were found, nor do I think it probable that any exist. Possibly, as in the case of the related species attacking Contarinia, Inostemma sometimes lays in a midge ovum containing already a Misocyclops (Platygaster) egg or vice versa ; but I saw no instance of this. Cases where Torymus abbreviatus parasitised larvae already attacked by Inostemma were several times observed. The only direct enemy of Inostemma was a small spider which built its web on the pear shoots and seemed frequently to catch it. Inostemma apparently needs for ovipository activity hotter weather and brighter sunshine than any of the other Perrisia parasitoids.

And that, O Best Beloved, is how the wasp got her handle.

____________________

Reference:

Myers, J.G. 1927. Natural enemies of the pear leaf-curling midge, Perrisia pyri, Bouche (Dipt. Cecidom.) Bulletin of Entomological Research18(2): 129-138.doi10.1017/S0007485300019799

Cat regularly catches bus in Dorset

November 21, 2012 • 1:04 am

From last year’s Torygraph, contributed by alert reader Kaoru (whose girlfriend found the article), we learn that a cat named Artful Dodger. . . well, I’ll let the paper tell the tale:

The ginger moggie, who was named after the Artful Dodger from Oliver Twist, has taken to hopping on and off the public transport at the bus station near his home.

The 15-year-old Tom even sits on bemused passengers’ laps as the bus makes up to 10 mile round trips from Bridport to Charmouth in Dorset.

Dodger is such a regular customer that some of the drivers take tins of cat food to work with them to give to him. They even know what stop to let him off at.

At the end of his journies the roving moggy returns to his home and owner Fee Jeanes.

Mrs Jeanes, 44, believes Dodger first took a liking to the buses as they are warm like greenhouses when the sun is on them.

The piece goes on to recount how Dodger learned to ride the bus to and fro, which you’ll have to see in the original piece. The article ends like this:

“The drivers buy cat food for him and he sits on people’s laps.

“Sometimes he just sits in the middle of the road and waits for the bus to turn up before he gets on.”

Dodger is familiar to regular bus passengers and drivers, but Mrs Jeanes still receives several calls a week asking if she has lost a ginger cat.

. . . A spokesman for bus firm First said they didn’t mind Dodger on their buses but didn’t actively encourage him.

He said: “The drivers have been asked not to feed it because we recognise that cat has an owner and we do not want to discourage it from returning home for food and shelter, but in principle we do not have a problem with it being around the bus station.

“Given this cat is elderly we suspect it would be eligible for free travel, perhaps a bus puss, if such a thing existed.”

Note the Freudian slip “bus puss” in the last sentence (I can’t believe that was deliberate!) “Artful Dodger” is an appropriate name!

I’m not sure what the age is for cats getting free bus passes, but since felids don’t pay taxes I don’t think they’d be eligible for a Senior Puss anyway.

Artful Dodger hops off the bus near his home in Bridport, Dorset Photo: Peter Willows/BNPS

Victory for first amendment: judge rules that Santa Monica can ban nativity scenes

November 21, 2012 • 1:00 am

A correct legal decision for the wrong reasons! Still, here’s an early holiday present: according to The Los Angeles Times, nativity scenes will not be allowed in a public park in Santa Monica, California:

In a closely watched case that has attracted national attention, Judge Audrey B. Collins denied a request from the Santa Monica Nativity Scenes Committee to erect multiple large displays depicting the story of the birth of Jesus in the park overlooking the ocean. The coalition of churches has erected the displays every December since the 1950s.

PHOTOS: Battle over Christmas displays

But last year, after requests for display spots exceeded the space allotted, the city held a lottery to allocate spaces. Atheists won 18 of 21 spots. A Jewish group won another. The traditional Nativity story that used to take up 14 displays was crammed into two.

I’m not sure whether the solution to having one religion’s displays on public land is to allow everyone’s religious displays (ego the lottery).  That still leaves some people out, and, even if such “let everyone’s faith be on tap” displays are legal, it would seem better to prohibit all such displays on public land. In the end, the judge decided that the banning involved not religious freedom, but logistical and financial difficulties for Santa Monica:

Controversy erupted, and as a result, the city decided the lottery would become increasingly costly. Last June, the City Council voted to ban all private unattended displays.

In October, Nativity scene proponents filed suit in federal court to allow the traditional Christian displays to continue. In a 27-page tentative ruling, Collins denied the group permission to erect their displays this year while the case is pending.

ABC News quotes from the ruling:

The coalition of churches that had put on the life-sized, 14-booth Nativity display for decades argued the city banned it rather than referee a religious dispute that began three years ago when atheists first set up their anti-God message alongside the Christmas diorama.

This is exactly why all such displays should be banned: so that judges don’t have to referee such disputes. In that sense the coalition of churches is correct.

The judge, however, said Santa Monica proved that it banned the displays not to squash religious speech but because they were becoming a drain on city resources, destroying the turf and obstructing ocean views. Churches can set up unattended displays at 12 other parks in the city with a permit and can leaflet, carol and otherwise present the Christmas story in Palisades Park when it is open, she said.

But that would seem to violate the First Amendment.

“I think all of the evidence that is admissible about the aesthetic impacts and administrative burden shows that this was a very reasonable alternative for the city to go this way — and it had nothing to do with content,” she said during a hearing in federal court in Los Angeles.

Yeah, right. As is often the case, the religious coalition makes a ridiculous comparison:

“The atheists won,” said William Becker, attorney for the Nativity group. He then went on to compare the city to Pontius Pilate, the judge at Jesus’ trial, saying: “It’s a shame about Christmas. Pontius Pilate was exactly the same kind of administrator.”

Well, the atheists did the right thing by entering the lottery, but there shouldn’t have been any lottery. If people want to put up scenes of baby Jesus at Christmas, let them do it on private land. What’s the insistence on using public parks for such displays, if not to deliberately breach the U.S.’s wall between church and state?

h/t: Linda Grilli