Quebec considering blasphemy law

September 17, 2015 • 2:00 pm

O Canada! What is happening to you? Perhaps this has been in the works for some time, but it was new to me.  Kyle Shileder at Townhall.com  reports that mischief is afoot in Quebec:

The Quebec Parliament is currently debating whether to pass Bill 59, a bill that would grant the Quebec Human Rights Commission (QHRC) the authority to investigate so-called “hate speech”, even without a complaint being filed.

The Head of the QHRC, Jacques Frémont has already openly said that he plans to use such powers, “to sue those critical of certain ideas, ‘people who would write against … the Islamic religion … on a website or on a Facebook page’” according to Canada’s National Post.

Two years ago, the Canadian Parliament abolished “hate speech” conveyed by the Internet or telephone as part of human rights laws. Why this step backwards? It appears, as suggested above, to be a reaction to the misguided efforts to protect criticism of Islam. How dare Frémont single out Islam and ignore other faiths? There’s further evidence:

Marc Lebuis, the Director of Point de Bascule, which publishes research and information on the threat posed to Canada by Islamist organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood, pointed out in his testimony before the Quebec Parliament that this resurrection is motivated in part by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).

What Mr. Frémont did not tell Radio-Canada when he alluded to these UN resolutions on December 2, 2014 is that they originally came from the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the OIC, that claims equivalence between hate speech, blasphemy, criticism of Islam and defamation of religions.

Lebuis is rightly aware that Quebec’s proposed law will not be applied uniformly just as Section 13 [the section overturned in 2013] was not. In 2008, Lebuis filed a complaint against an Imam whose writings lauded beheading and exterminating homosexuals, denigrated Jews, and called for violent jihad in any place Muslims had the power to overthrow non-Muslim rule.

The Human Rights Commission declined to hear the case.

Let us make no mistake about it: it is odious for any democracy to prohibit criticism of any religion, be it Christianity, Islam, or Scientology. Such a prohibition is contrary to Enlightenment principles and inimical to social progress. “Hate speech” is often a euphemism for “criticism of religion,” or even “criticism of ideas I don’t like.” Yes, there can be genuine hate speech, like that uttered by the Imam above, but I don’t believe any of it should be banned unless it calls for imminent violence.

That’s the way the U.S. operates—or is supposed to. Is there any reason why our enlightened neighbor to the north shouldn’t follow suit? Not that I see. Fortunately, the saner Canadians are raising serious questions about this bill (see here, here, and here). Even some Canadian Muslims, peace be upon them, feel that the bill is unnecessary. Let us hope it dies a quiet death.

Here’s a map showing where blasphemy is criminalized. Black means you can be executed for it, red means you can be imprisoned for it, orange means you can be fined for it, and yellow means there are local restrictions on blasphemy. France and Australia—seriously?

blasphemy-laws-map16

Here’s the chipmunk!

September 17, 2015 • 11:00 am

Here’s the answer to today’s earlier “spot the chipmunk” post, with a comment by photographer Diana MacPherson:

Here is the chipmunk with a circle around him. They blend in so well in the leaves. When I saw this one, he hid behind a tree. It was cute that when I peered around the tree, he moved more behind the tree! 🙂

Squirrels of course do that too. I think it’s a behavior genetically instilled by natural selection, and one could test that by looking at the behavior of naive, hand-reared squirrels (or chimpmunks).

chipmunkreveal

 

Radio show today

September 17, 2015 • 10:15 am

I’ll be appearing on KPCC (a Southern California Public Radio Station) live today; the show is AirTalk with host Larry Mantle, and the topic is, as usual these days, the issue of faith versus fact.

The time is approximately 2:30 pm Chicago (Central) time (it could start as late as 2:40), 3:30 pm EDT (i.e., time in New York), and 8:30 pm London time. You can listen to it live here.

Schrödinger’s bacterium: physicists plan to put a microbe in two places at the same time

September 17, 2015 • 9:15 am

Okay, this is WAY above my pay grade, but I’ve been sent articles on this by several authors, including an explanation at the Guardian. It’s a description by two theoretical physicists of an experiment that uses quantum superposition to put a bacterium in two places at the same time. They plan to collaborate with experimentalists to actually carry it out. Here’s what the Guardian says about it:

The researchers plan to build on the work of others at the University of Colorado who showed in 2013 that a tiny, vibrating aluminium membrane could be placed in a superposition of states.

“We propose to simply put a small microbe on top of the aluminum membrane. The microbe will also be in a superposition state when the aluminum membrane is in a superposition state. The principle is quite simple,” Dr Li said.

The researchers plan to go one step further in a second experiment that would entangle the position of the microbe with the spin of an electron inside it. “The purpose of the second experiment is to make the system useful. It can be used to detect defects of DNA and proteins in a microbe, and image the microbe with single electron spin sensitivity,” Dr Li said.

Li said he hoped to conduct the experiment, but that leading scientists in the field had laboratories better equipped to take the project on, and that he hoped to collaborate with them. “If the top group in quantum electromechanics want to focus on doing this experiment, I think a microbe could be put into a superposition state in three years,” he said.

The experiment is proposed in a paper by Tongcang Li and Zhang-Qi Yin (full pdf here) placed at ArXiv before publication. The abstract:

Schrödinger’s thought experiment to prepare a cat in a superposition of both alive and dead states reveals profound consequences of quantum mechanics and has attracted enormous interests. Here we propose a straightforward method to create quantum superposition states of a living microorganism by putting a small bacterium on top of an electromechanical oscillator. Our proposal is based on recent developments that the center-of-mass oscillation of a 15-μm-diameter aluminium membrane has been cooled to its quantum ground state [Nature 475, 359 (2011)], and entangled with a microwave field [Science, 342, 710 (2013)]. A microorganism with a mass much smaller than the mass of the electromechanical membrane will not significantly affect the quality factor of the membrane and can be cooled to the quantum ground state together with the membrane. Quantum superposition and teleportation of its center-of-mass motion state can be realized with the help of superconducting microwave circuits. More importantly, the internal states of a microorganism, such as the electron spin of a glycine radical, can be prepared in a quantum superposition state and entangled with its center-of-mass motion. Our proposal can be realized with state-of-art technologies. The proposed setup is also a quantum-limited magnetic resonance force microscope (MRFM) that not only can detect the existence of an electron spin, but also can coherently manipulate and detect the quantum state of the spin.

And here’s the diagram of the experiment from the paper:

Screen Shot 2015-09-16 at 10.23.23 AM

Because this is all beyond my ken, I asked Official Website Physicist™ Sean Carroll for a comment on the feasibility of the experiment. (Note that Sean is giving the famous Gifford Lectures next year and has an intriguing Book on Everything coming out next May). His take:

As far as Schrödinger’s microbe is concerned — there’s no problem in principle, though I am quite dubious in practice. Quantum mechanics says that things can be in superpositions of different locations, and everything in the world (including bacteria) is governed by the rules of quantum mechanics, so it’s certainly conceivable.
The problem is that to count as a “superposition” you need to keep the system unentangled from the rest of the world — once the thing interacts with the environment, the superposition branches the whole wave function of the universe (the phenomenon known as “decoherence”). That’s why we can’t even imagine doing it for real cats; they’re always breathing and radiating heat and so forth, thereby interacting with their environments. It seems to me that the same would be true for a bacterium, or anything else that we would qualify as “alive” — unless you were talking about very short time periods indeed. (I’d be much less skeptical if it were a freeze-dried bacterium.) Note that the paper is a theoretical proposal, not an experimental result.
Well, I don’t fully understand this experiment yet (remember Richard Feynman’s dictum that if you think you understand quantum mechanics, you really don’t), but at least I understand it a bit more. Readers with physics expertise are invited to comment, explaining the design and its feasibility. Seriously!
And Matthew Cobb tells me that the experiment is being heavily discussed and criticized on Twi**er, noting, “Many people are saying in comments they don’t understand it and are suggesting authors don’t, either.” But he added this funny tw**t. I wonder if Deepak Chopra will tout this study as support for his woo.
IMG_3047

h/t: Grania

Readers’ wildlife photos

September 17, 2015 • 8:00 am

We’ll have a special truncated edition of Readers’ Wildlife today as there will shortly be a Spot the Chimpunk picture. But we have four lovely pictures of bees from reader Mark Sturtevant; this is the first of two batches.

I now have a hefty number of what I hope are interesting pictures of insects and other arthropods. This latest installment has a theme, which is bees.

There are several different families of bees. Most bees are quite hairy, and their hairs are of course used to gather and carry pollen. Another character of most bees is that the hind leg has an enlarged 1st tarsal (foot) segment. This is especially true of some of the social bees like this honeybee (Apis mellifera). Here, what looks like a whole leg segment at the end of the hind leg is really the 1st segment of the foot. I bring these points up for a reason, as we will learn soon. All of the following bees belong to solitary species. Most bees are solitary, and solitary bees are critical plant pollinators that deserve a lot more appreciation.

1HoneyBee

I am not great at identifying all kinds of bees, but I think this one is a male long-horned bee (Svastra obliqua?), given its wonderfully long antennae. This is one of my favorite pictures that I have taken this summer.

2LongHorned

This bee is similar to the previous, and is either a female long-horn bee (they have shorter antennae) or it is a digger bee (perhaps genus Habropoda). It looks like it got stuck in a bag of Cheetos.

3DiggerBeePollen

We had swarms of tiny halictid bees in our garden. There are several genera of these green ‘sweat bees’, and so I do not know the species that we have around here. I had a lot of fun taking pictures of these little beauties in the yard, but they were also challenging due to their small size and also for their speed since they would usually zip from flower to flower.

4Halictid1b

Finally, and just for fun, we have some urban wildlife, from a tw**t by “x” via Matthew Cobb:

Screen Shot 2015-09-17 at 6.04.27 AM

I wonder if it had a cheesesteak before it found a smoke. (I also suspect someone put the smoke into its claw, since the cigarette is lit.)

Buffalo Springfield Week: Rock & Roll Woman

September 17, 2015 • 7:15 am

We have two more songs in Buffalo Springfield Week, which will finish up nicely tomorrow. This song, clearly by Stephen Stills, appeared on the “Buffalo Springfield Again” album in 1967.

Back then Stills had a great, gravelly blues voice, as you can see on this cut. The guitar work is superb, and the change of pace and styles clearly presages Stills’ later work with Crosby, Stills, & Nash—especially “Suite: Judy Blue Eyes,” one of the great rock songs of our time.

There’s a woman that you ought to know,
And she’s coming, singing soft and low,
Singing rock and roll, she’s a joy to know.
‘Neath the shadow of a soothing hand
I am free there, just to make my plans,
Dream of far away lands, anything close at hand.
And she will follow me wide, do you know,
Familiar places she’s been by, that I know,
Could it be, she don’t have to try.
And tomorrow, she’s a friend of mine
And the sorrow, I see her face is lined
She’s no longer blind, she’s just hard to find.

Here’s a live version—clearly lip-synched, but it’s nice to see the group when they were all very Young, bedecked in psychedelic clothes and beads.

Thursday: Hili dialogue

September 17, 2015 • 6:30 am

It’s Thursday, with a high of 69°F predicted, and the storms will start tomorrow. But Monday, my Big Trip Day, is predicted to be fair. I have a big podcast radio interview today, but more on that later (you can listen live). In this day in 1787, the United States Constitution was signed in Philadelphia: a BIG DAY for all Americans. Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is just messing with Andrzej:

A: What are you worried about?
Hili: I’ve lost the Higgs boson somewhere.

P1030373

In Polish:
Ja: Czym się tak martwisz?
Hili: Gdzieś mi się zgubił bozon Higgsa.
And here’s a bonus Hili-and-Cyrus “buddies” picture from Andrzej’s Facebook page:
12027746_10207085521403752_2114163785059971878_n