WTF, transitional forms?

23 thoughts on “WTF, transitional forms?”

1. Wouldn’t throwing him back in be a form of artificial selection?

   1. Just because homo sapiens was involved doesn’t automatically make it “artificial selection”. One could argue everything we do is “natural”.

2. “We do the evolving around here!”

3. Yeah, well he’s gonna remember that. In 200 or so millions years, he’ll be here for payback.

   1. And payback, as the saying goes, is a real female canine.

4. Two words:

   “Land Shark”

   . . . gulp!!!

5. It evolved a wood or stone limb? That’s so special!

6. A day in the life of Ken Ham.

7. That’ll show that uppity little fish! Take the tik right out of his talik!

   1. Coela-can’t!!

      1. And A-can’t-hostega!!
         There are others…

      2. Ha! That’s a good one.

      3. Good one!

   2. +1

8. What a jerk – throwing him back down the ladder of progress. That’s downright nasty. Does he think he’s God or something?

   1. Nah, he was probably a creationist keen on concealing evidence of evolution – perhaps the same one who tried to create fake human foot prints next to those of a dinosaur.

9. Looks to be a trout…

10. It obviously was a progressive liberal!

11. If he’s tasty, it’ll make fishing easier, so there’s that.

12. Yes fish – that niche is taken!

13. I have often wondered how a creationist can see a walking catfish and explain it away.

    I mean a catfish is indisputably a fish, which the Bible says in very plain language is a “kind” that only swims in the waters.

    Why isn’t a walking catfish “game over” to these people?

14. Saw this fish trying to evolve into a dragonfly. Anyone want to gang up with me to teach him (?) a lesson?

15. sub

Comments are closed.