Welcome to Thursday, January 23, 2025 and National Pie Day, a most excellent day. What should it be: cherry, pecan, lemon meringue, or an old favorite of mine that I haven’t had for years: sour cream/raisin pie? It so happens that I am receiving a shoofly pie, sent from an Amish bakery in Pennsylvania, and it should arrive today. This is what it will look like. If you haven’t had this molasses based pie, you haven’t lived (good with coffee for breakfast!)

It’s also International Sticky Toffee Pudding Day (perhaps Britain’s best dessert), National Rhubarb Pie Day (the world’s WORST dessert), and National Handwriting Day (mine gets worse as I age).
There’s a Google Doodle today; if you want to play a Moon game, click on the screenshot below:
Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the January 23 Wikipedia page.
Da Nooz:
*Throughout the U.S., state and city officials are planning to either thwart or refuse to enforce Trump’s proposed plans to deport immigrants who came here illegally. I can even see this in my neighborhood email group. Anticipating this, Trump is now planning to investigate any official who does this:
The interim leadership of the Justice Department has ordered U.S. attorneys around the country to investigate and prosecute law enforcement officials in states and cities if they refuse to enforce the Trump administration’s new immigration policies, according to an internal department memo.
The three-page memo, intended as guidance to all department employees for carrying out President Trump’s executive orders seeking to limit immigration and foreign gangs, asserts that state and local officials are bound to cooperate with the department under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause and could face criminal prosecution or civil penalties if they fail to comply.
The memo came as the Department of Homeland Security prepared to make targeted raids in cities, including Chicago and San Diego, with high numbers of undocumented immigrants — setting up a possible confrontation with local officials. The document underscored the central role the Justice Department will play in enforcing Mr. Trump’s hard-line immigration agenda.
“Federal law prohibits state and local actors from resisting, obstructing, and otherwise failing to comply with lawful immigration-related commands,” wrote Emil Bove III, the department’s interim deputy attorney general and a former member of the president’s criminal defense team.
U.S. attorneys’ offices and officials from various branches of the department’s Washington headquarters “shall investigate instances involving any such misconduct for potential prosecution,” Mr. Bove wrote, pointing to the same federal obstruction law used in the federal indictment against Mr. Trump that accused him of inciting the rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
Mr. Bove also warned localities against taking action to contradict the new federal policies and instructed the department’s civil lawyers to “identify state and local laws, policies, and activities” that flout Mr. Trump’s executive orders and “where appropriate, to take legal action to challenge such laws.”
I am still dubious whether the loudly announced raids will take place, but believe me, they have scared the bejeezus out of people in my town. And I suppose the law is the law, and Trump has the right to do this. We’ll see about the optics of these deportations soon—if Trump does indeed carry out his “promises.”
*As Chicago baseball announcer Harry Carey used to say, “HOLY COW!” Yes, the Wall Street Journal editorial board has denounced Trump—for pardoning the January 6 insurrectionists. And rightly so! An excerpt:
Republicans are busy denouncing President Biden’s pre-emptive pardons for his family and political allies, and deservedly so. But then it’s a shame you don’t hear many, if any, ruing President Trump’s proclamation to pardon unconditionally nearly all of the people who rioted at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. This includes those convicted of bludgeoning, chemical spraying, and electroshocking police to try to keep Mr. Trump in power. Now he’s springing them from prison.
This is a rotten message from a President about political violence done on his behalf, and it’s a bait and switch. Asked about Jan. 6 pardons in late November, Mr. Trump projected caution. “I’m going to do case-by-case, and if they were nonviolent, I think they’ve been greatly punished,” he said. “We’re going to look at each individual case.”
Taking cues from the boss, last week Vice President JD Vance drew a clear line: “If you committed violence on that day, obviously you shouldn’t be pardoned.”
So much for that. The President’s clemency proclamation commutes prison sentences to time served for 14 named people, including prominent leaders of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, who were organized and ready for violence. Then Mr. Trump tries to wipe Jan. 6 clean, with “a full, complete and unconditional pardon to all other individuals.” The conceit is that there are hundreds of polite Trump supporters who ended up in the wrong place that day and have since rotted in jail.
Out of roughly 1,600 cases filed by the feds, more than a third included accusations of “assaulting, resisting, or impeding law enforcement.” The U.S. Attorney’s office said it declined “hundreds” of prosecutions against people whose only offense was entering restricted grounds near the Capitol. Of the 1,100 sentences handed down by this year, more than a third didn’t involve prison time. The rioters who did get jail often were charged with brutal violence [they then give examples].
. . . There are more like this, which everyone understood on Jan. 6 and shortly afterward. “There is nothing patriotic about what is occurring on Capitol Hill,” one GOP official tweeted. “This is 3rd world style anti-American anarchy.” That was Marco Rubio, now Mr. Trump’s Secretary of State. He was right. What happened that day is a stain on Mr. Trump’s legacy. By setting free the cop beaters, the President adds another.
Them’s rough words for Trump from the WSJ!
*I don’t much care for Prince Harry or Meghan Markle, as I see them as self-aggrandizing publicity hounds, but they’re presumably a lot richer now that Harry has won a lawsuit against the Sun newspaper group for “unlawful intrusion into his private life.”
The publisher of the Sun newspaper has agreed to pay “substantial damages” and apologised to the Duke of Sussex to settle a long-running legal battle over claims of unlawful intrusion into his life.
Prince Harry alleged journalists and private investigators working for News Group Newspapers (NGN) used unlawful techniques to pry on his private life – and executives then allegedly covered it up.
NGN apologised for “serious intrusion” by the Sun between 1996 and 2011, and admitted “incidents of unlawful activity” were carried out by private investigators working for the newspaper, in a statement read out in court.
It also apologised for distress it caused Harry through the “extensive coverage” and “serious intrusion” into the private life of his late mother, Princess Diana.
When he launched his claim, the prince alleged that more than 200 articles published by NGN between 1996 and 2011 contained information gathered by illegal means.
He repeatedly said he wanted the case to go to trial so that he could get “accountability” for other alleged victims of unlawful newsgathering.
NGN was “surprised by the serious approach by Prince Harry for settlement in recent days”, a source told the BBC.
A source close to the Duke of Sussex responded that the apology “provides all the insight you need”.
Speaking outside court on behalf of Prince Harry, his barrister David Sherborne described the settlement as a “monumental victory”, and said NGN had been “finally held to account for its illegal actions and its blatant disregard for the law”.
The BBC understands the settlements to both Prince Harry and former Labour deputy leader Lord Tom Watson have cost NGN more than £10m in pay outs and legal fees.
In total NGN has spent upwards of £1bn in damages and costs to those who claim their phones were hacked and their privacy invaded by the News of the World and the Sun.
. . . The apology also covers incidents of unlawful activities carried out by private investigators working for the Sun newspaper from 1996-2011, the statement said – but “not by journalists”.
You can find the apology here, though it does not admit the newspaper engaged in any illegal actions. There is no word what the “substantial damages” will be, but Harry is of course already extremely wealthy.
*Here’s a deceptive article in the NYT, (archived here) called “Even religious people don’t trust religious institutions.” It starts with the story of a Catholic who, for good reasons, no longer goes to church, but then segues into—you got it—the God-shaped hole that supposedly runs through humanity:
Often, church or temple leaders learn about accusations, and instead of dealing with them, they try to make the problem disappear by moving the perpetrator to another location. Upholding the public image of the institution is more important than protecting the vulnerable or seeking justice for them.
Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning.It’s bad enough when secular institutions do this. But religious institutions are supposed to provide a moral example, even when it’s not easy. When spiritual authorities ignore their values and their responsibility to the parents and children who trusted them, it’s crushing.
As a secular, mildly observant Jew, I don’t feel strongly about whether other Americans attend religious services or believe in God. But I do care about the pervasive — and honestly, warranted — cynicism that young people have about religious institutions, because I think it is contributing to a more disconnected, careless and cruel society.
In October 2023, Harvard’s Making Caring Common Project published a report about youth mental health problems that found that “nearly three in five young adults (58 percent) reported that they lacked ‘meaning or purpose’ in their lives in the previous month. Half of young adults reported that their mental health was negatively influenced by ‘not knowing what to do with my life.’” However, they found that young adults who belonged to any religion were more likely to report having meaning and purpose.
Religious institutions are certainly not the only potential avenue for meaning, purpose and value in society. But we can’t underestimate the power of their reach, even in an increasingly secular world. When they have epic moral failures, it affects all of us, because it makes everyone more suspicious of potentially welcoming communities. Religious organizations are one of the few kinds of groups left in America that are free to join and have few barriers to entry. Faith groups are among vanishingly few organizations that are meant for people of all ages, where the entire family can ideally feel welcome. I wish there were more secular communities that offered the same kind of support across life spans that religious groups provide, but at least for now, there are few nonreligious alternatives.
As Steven Tipton, a professor emeritus at Emory’s Candler School of Theology, points out in his new book, “In and Out of Church: The Moral Arc of Spiritual Change in America,” millions of Americans who say they have no religion in particular are actually “liminal” in that they may leave religious communities “only for a season.” It would help bring these liminals back if religious communities pursued “a truer, wider path toward the common good.”
Note the statement that we have to bring these people back to religion. But why can’t they join humanistic communities rather than ones that share belief in fictitious supernatural beings? And what accounts for all the recent palaver about this god-shaped hole mishigass?
*Medals from the Paris Olympics are decaying, especially the bronze ones. And it’s not even a year since they were handed out
For any Paris Olympic swimmers who are considering celebrating their bronze medals around a pool, they might want to think twice.
Reports are already rolling in from Paris from athletes claiming their bronze medals have visibly deteriorated before the Olympics have even concluded. American skateboarder Nyjah Huston was the first to publicly criticize the quality of the bronze medals just a week after winning his hardware in the men’s street event, posting a photo on his Instagram story that showed serious discoloration.
“They’re apparently not as high quality as you’d think,” Huston said. “It’s looking rough. I don’t know, Olympic medals, we gotta step up the quality a little bid. The medal looking like it went to war and back.”
British diver Yasmin Harper echoed the sentiment after capturing bronze in the women’s 3m synchronized springboard last week.
“There has been some small bits of tarnishing I will admit, yes,” Harper said. “I don’t know, I think it’s like water or anything that gets on the metal, it’s making it go a little bit discolored.”
The good news is that Paris 2024 Olympic organizers responded to the social media firestorm on Friday, assuring athletes that damaged medals will be “systematically replaced.”
“Paris 2024 is aware of a social media report from an athlete whose medal is showing damage a few days after it was awarded,” a spokesperson told The Daily Mail. “Paris 2024 is working closely with the Monnaie de Paris, the institution tasked with the production and quality control of the medals, and together with the National Olympic Committee of the athlete concerned, in order to appraise the medal to understand the circumstances and cause of the damage. The medals are the most coveted objected of the Games and the most precious for the athletes.”
Bronze medals are not actually made of bronze, but rather “red brass.” Both brass and bronze are copper alloys, but red brass is made of more zinc than bronze is. Bronze is generally harder and more durable than brass, but brass is more malleable and easier to shape.
Each Paris Olympic medal features a small piece of iron from the Eiffel Tower, collected over the last century during renovations. The medals were designed by the Chaumet House of Jewellery, a luxury jewelry and watch brand headquartered in Paris. The backs of both the Olympic and Paralympic designs are the same, including the hexagon-shaped piece of iron.
Here’s Huston’s medal, and it’s in bad shape:
Meanwhile, a gold medal from the St. Louis Olympics in 1904 has just been auctioned off for over $545,000. And back then they were really gold:
This was the first Olympics where gold medals were awarded and the Americans took advantage, winning 78 of 96 events. Unlike Olympic medals these days which are mostly made of silver with gold plating, these were smaller and made entirely of gold.
Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili contemplates Andrzej’s first book, written in the 1970s, about Polish politics and economics.
Hili: What book is this?A: A very old book about times very long ago.
Hili: Co to za książka?Ja: Bardzo stara książka o bardzo dawnych czasach.
*******************
From Merilee:
From Rawan Osman:
And from Cat Memes:
From Andrzej’s Facebook page: he noticed that many of the very people who go after Musk for supposedly making a Hitler salute admire groups that REALLY make Hitler salutes:
Speaking of which, here’s a group of cowards at Columbia doing their usual cowardly protest (h/t Luana), and FIRE calls them out. This is at Columbia University, of course, which I suspect will soon have to settle a large lawsuit for promoting an antisemitic atmosphere:
Speaking out is important, but shouldn’t involve disrupting a class on Israel or anything else. @Columbia is right to discourage disruptive behavior but should better educate students on what protests are protected. FIRE is ready to help. https://t.co/p8nbYZUpAy
— FIRE (@TheFIREorg) January 22, 2025
Bill Maher has a rather disgusting example of social progress:
We need to celebrate progress! #TrueStory pic.twitter.com/mHpm0uB8pv
— Bill Maher (@billmaher) January 22, 2025
From Malcolm: a cat missing its two front legs. But it’s doing fine!
Cat doesn’t have front 2 legs 🥺 pic.twitter.com/BGp36G8HVx
— Cats That Make You Go Awww (@CuteAdorableCat) January 14, 2025
From JKR, pointing out a failure of the American left:
A noisy part of the left still refuses to step outside their sex-is-a-social-construct bubble and acknowledge that their embrace of gender identity ideology has been a calamity. They were warned the right was capitalising on their betrayal of women and girls. They didn’t listen. https://t.co/aoprjiO8nz
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) January 20, 2025
Two tweets from Jez’s “lovely pets” thread:
19. Happy tail syndrome pic.twitter.com/w3MmyngBF8
— Wolf of X (@tradingMaxiSL) January 17, 2025
From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I reposted:
A Dutch boy was gassed to death upon arriving at Auschwitz. He was seven years old.
— Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-01-23T11:42:16.769Z
Two posts from Dr. Cobb. Did you know that male narwhal tusks are directionally asymmetrical (it’s the left one that’s big), but also there’s a vestigial one? (Only males have the long tusk, which is an enlarged incisor tooth.)
We all know male narwhals have one long tusk. In this cool display, the skull in the middle has been dissected to show that the right tusk is also there, but it's tiny, and embedded within the upper jaw.BTW female #narwhals are almost never displayed in #museums (the other skulls here are belugas)
— Jack Ashby (@jackdashby.bsky.social) 2025-01-22T14:25:11.466Z
Trees that produce baby trees, with the seeds growing before they’ve fallen from the tree. There’s a link:
Animals lay eggs or birth babies. Trees make seeds…except for the ones that have live babies, like we do?! I wrote for @biographic.bsky.social about the genetics of baby-having mangrove trees, and why they might have evolved this way: http://www.biographic.com/how-some-tre… 🧪
— Elizabeth Preston (@inkfish.bsky.social) 2025-01-22T13:58:39.833Z



































