Tuesday: Hili dialogue

March 18, 2025 • 6:55 am

Welcome to The Cruelest Day: March 18, 2025, and it’s National Sloppy Joe Day.  I love them, but the sandwich seems to have gone extinct. (It’s loose ground beef, onions, and ketchup on a bun, and my mom used to make them.) Here’s one:

Buck Blues, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

It’s also World Social Work Day, National Lacy Oatmeal Cookie Day (?), and National Agriculture Day.

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the March 18 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*David French has an intriguing (and probably accurate) op-ed in the NYT called, “Don’t fool yourself into thinking it will stop with Columbia” (archived here). Greg Mayer, who sent the link, says, “One part of his legal analysis seems to have a lacuna in it, but it’s quite good. A few excerpts:

Columbia University is now the epicenter of the American culture war. The Trump administration is targeting a former Columbia student — and the university itself — as a test case for its new authoritarian regime.

. . . .While that statement sounds damning, the reality is that [Mahmoud] Khalil was detained because of his protest activity and not because he’d provided illegal support for terrorists. As an administration official told The Free Press, “The allegation here is not that he was breaking the law.”

In an interview with NPR, Troy Edgar, the deputy secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, made it clear that the administration was targeting Khalil’s expression. “We’ve invited and allowed the student to come into the country,” Edgar said, “and he’s put himself in the middle of the process of basically pro-Palestinian activity. And at this point, like I said, the secretary of state can review his visa process at any point and revoke it.”

But there is no visa to review. Khalil is a permanent resident now. Make no mistake, the arrest and detention of Mahmoud Khalil are a direct attack on free speech.

While I’m appalled by the administration’s actions, I’m not surprised that the case arose out of what someone was doing at Columbia. The university has been in various degrees of political turmoil for decades.

. . . .In other words, universities possess a double obligation — to protect students and faculty and staff members from discrimination and harassment, while also protecting free expression on campus. It’s not an easy task. It requires a combination of wisdom and courage.

But the Trump administration possesses neither wisdom nor courage, and it is now in the process of using claims of antisemitism on campus as a justification for grave violations of due process and free speech. The Red Scares of 20th-century anti-communism are being replaced by a new frenzy, whipped up against left-wing supporters of the Palestinian cause.

French also chastises Columbia for its antisemitic atomosphere, but his main point is that freedom of speech is going to be destroyed in all universities if Trump keeps up like this.

When I told Greg that I pretty much agreed with French, he told me about the lacuna in logic:

It’s not that his argument differs from yours (indeed, I think you two agree in all or most details), but that concurrence from an evangelical Christian lawyer in the NYT is notable.
The lacuna is here. French writes:
A different statute, 8 U.S.C. Section 1182, says that any alien who “endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization” can be blocked from entering the country. Violation of that same statute can be grounds for deportation as well.
The cited USC means the First Amendment doesn’t fully apply to visa-seekers (because endorsing terrorist activity is protected for citizens). He also states that violation can be grounds for deportation of an alien (i.e. one who is already here), but doesn’t make clear if that includes green card holders or not
So when he then says that:
. . . even if Khalil did endorse terrorist attacks on Israel, that is still constitutionally protected speech. The First Amendment permits advocacy of violence, including illegal violence. The First Amendment permits advocacy of violence, including illegal violence . . .
it’s not clear if green card holders enjoy that constitutional protection.
His noting that there has been an absolute failure of due process, and that it is astounding that the “remedies” include taking over and reorganizing the academic structure of a private university, are noteworthy.

Finally, I found this thread about the piece on Twitter (click to go to site), noting a “remarkable admission” by the NYT, to wit:

Khalil is still being detained in Louisiana, with the Trump administration hoping that a conservative Southern judge will rule on his case. But it will go to the Supreme Court.

*And another NYT op-ed, showing why the Democrats were wrong to criticize Chuck Schumer when he pushed his fellow Senate Democrats to vote for a Republican bill against a government shutdown: “There’s a price for promising what isn’t possible in Congress” (archived here). It’s by Brendan Buck, a Republican, but I agree with him here:

On Friday the Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, committed the grave sin of accepting reality, and his party is now furious.

Democrats were outmaneuvered by House Republicans on a measure to fund the government, and the only options for Democrats by late last week were to fold and vote for it or plunge into a government shutdown for which they were likely to pay a heavy political price.

Mr. Schumer understood this and spared the country and his party from the damage. It is dangerous territory for members of Congress to try to convince their base — or themselves — that they have more power than they do. At some point the bill comes due.

The truth is that this funding fight was over the moment House Speaker Mike Johnson was able to pass the G.O.P. bill without the help of the minority in the House. Still, some Democrats have deluded themselves into thinking the threat of shutdown provided some kind of leverage to rein in President Trump’s assault on the federal work force. Others believed that if they showed Mr. Trump the party was willing to fight, they would be in a stronger position next time. This is nonsense.

Shutdowns are not resolved through a negotiated peace or compromise. They almost always end when one side has taken a brutal political beating long enough that it finally throws in the towel. The party that forced the shutdown usually gets nothing but demoralization.

. . . . .As a result, I have sat through more than a couple of government shutdowns. Mr. Schumer is right that a shutdown was not a winning play for Democrats. It never is for the party that puts one into motion. In this case, it would have been an incredible political gift to Mr. Trump, who would love to change the subject from the market free fall and his sagging approval rating.

Yep, shutting down the government would have been a win for the Republicans had the shutdown been effected by the Democrats. Nevertheless, the younger and “progressive” Democrats were all for it, calling Schumer an out-of-touch fogey.  But Schumer has been around long enough to know whose bread gets buttered, and he’s right. It’s not only bad for the government to shut it down now, but especially bad for Democrats, who don’t seem able to avoid doubling down on what made them lose.

*A headline at the Free Press caught my eye: “Things worth remembering: Death is a friend.” It’s by Sean Fischer, Bari Weiss’s editorial assistant at the site.” WHAT? And again we have the site osculating religion:

Earlier this year, I wrote about my mom’s devastating misdiagnosis. After battling mysterious symptoms for years, she was told by her doctors, at the age of 61, that she had early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. There was no hope of a cure, only a prolonged goodbye. I was 21 then. And though my mom made an unexpected, miraculous recovery, 18 months later, I will forever be grateful for my aunt’s gift, Anam Ċara: A Book of Celtic Wisdom, which I leaned on in those anxious days.

The author, John O’Donohue, was an Irish poet, philosopher, and former Catholic priest, who died in 2008 at the age of 52. This book, published in 1997, blends ancient Irish philosophy, Christian theology, and lyrical poetry—offering an immersive introduction to the spirituality of my ancestors, the Celts.

The root of this spirituality is friendship. Anam Ċara is Gaelic for “soul friend,” the Celtic term for a companion who acts as a guide and teacher through life. In such a friendship, O’Donohue explains, your spirits join. “You feel free to release yourself into the trust and shelter of the other person’s soul.”

But to the Celts, friendship doesn’t exist simply between humans. It is also a way of relating to God, to nature, and all its inhabitants. “To be holy,” O’Donohue writes, is “to be natural, to befriend the worlds that come to balance in you.” The Celts rejected divisions between heaven and earth, time and eternity. To me, in that time of uncertainty, this was profoundly comforting.

Though I grew as a deeply faithful Christian, when I was confronted with my mom’s mortality, I felt divided from the God I thought would protect her. The church’s teaching, that eternal peace waits for us in another life, didn’t lessen my family’s suffering. But here was O’Donohue, with a message for those who are left behind on Earth in the wake of death. “That which seems to pass away on the surface of time,” he writes, “is in fact transfigured and housed in the tabernacle of memory.”

In other words, the division between the living and the dead is false.

. . . .We are bound to the rhythms of the Earth, which include death.

So you have to befriend it.

No I don’t have to fricking befriend it. I don’t want to die! I may reach the point where I’m so feeble or in so much pain that I don’t mind dying, but I will never befriend it. Nor did Christopher Hitchens, even when he knew he was terminally ill.  As he said, dying is like being at a party, and Death taps you on the shoulder and says, “You have to leave now, but the party will go on.”  And I want to go on, too.

*Also from the FP we have an article on our “progressive” Democratic governor, J. B. Pritzker (I did vote for him and he’s pretty okay, but sometimes off the rails). He’s off the rails this time with hypocrisy: “Is JB Pritzker wants to lead the Trump resistance. But is he turning his back on DEI?

Since the election of Donald Trump, Democratic Illinois governor JB Pritzker has emerged as a key figure in the Resistance 2.0. A longtime proponent of diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, Pritzker has described Trump’s attack on DEI as an attempt to “tear down” civil rights. He also called Trump “unfit to lead” after the president suggested DEI played a role in a tragic aircraft collision in January in Washington, D.C.

But, according to a Free Press review of internet archive records, Pritzker’s own family nonprofit appears to have scrubbed a slew of DEI language from its website on March 11. The Pritzker Family Foundation eliminated the phrase justice and equity from its mission statement and jettisoned the word inequities to describe its focus on social justice. The group also removed the word equitable from the statement that said the group had a “deep desire to create more just and equitable outcomes.”And the foundation removed an entire sentence from its website that read: “Learn more about our ongoing efforts to apply a lens of Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI) to our grantmaking here,” which linked to a downloadable foundation document detailing its “ongoing journey” to embrace DEI. This document can no longer be found on the foundation’s site, but was located by The Free Press on the internet archive.

. . .The document, which according to its file name was created in 2021, said that “diversity and inclusion” are “central to the foundation’s work.” It described how the organization is analyzing “inequitable systems” that discriminate against minorities as it shapes its philanthropic giving.

Progressive activist Misty Gaither says the alterations cast doubt on whether the Pritzker Family Foundation was serious about promoting DEI in the first place. “If anyone can so quickly scrub their website, their efforts have been performative at best over the last several years,” Gaither, who advises companies on DEI and is the former vice president of DEI and Belonging at Indeed, told The Free Press.

The Pritzker Family Foundation did not respond to a request for comment on the changes to its website. A spokesperson for the governor’s office said Pritzker has “been clear” that he will not roll back government DEI programs in Illinois and is continuing to push back against the Trump administration.

Here’s the before and after when “equity” was scrubbed (click to enlarge).

In fact, I see that of the “DEI” acronym, it’s the “E”, for “equity” that is disappearing in various universities.  No surprise about that: who can object to “diversity” or “inclusion” in principle? But “equity” implies affirmative action of sorts, and not everybody is down with that.

*As the weather warms up, the pro-Palestinian crowd is becoming busy on campus again.  According to the Chicago Maroon, a legal memorial for Kir Bibas, the youngest of the three members of the Bibas family (mom and two young sons) who were kidnapped by Hamas on October 7, 2023, was vandalized. The two children were reportedly strangled to death with bare hands, and the Maroons for Israel, a pro-Israeli organization, put up a crib on campus to remind people of the savagery of Hamas. The University decried the vandalism.

The University released a statement denouncing the vandalism of a Maroons for Israel (MFI) installation on the quad as a violation of “the University’s longstanding commitment to free expression.”

A University Student Centers–approved MFI installation on the main quad outside Swift Hall was vandalized on March 7, per a MFI statement.

The installation consisted of a crib containing an Israeli flag and a poster with photos of Kfir Bibas, a nine-month-old Israeli taken hostage during the October 7, 2023 attacks and later killed. The poster was partially ripped and left on the ground.

In its statement, the University restated its position regarding damage to approved installations and noted that the University of Chicago Police Department (UCPD) is currently investigating the incident. The University also shared information about how students can receive support for freedom of expression–related concerns.

“Maintaining UChicago’s environment of free expression for a wide diversity of perspectives takes unremitting effort on everyone’s behalf,” the statement read.

In its March 7 statement posted on Instagram, MFI condemned the vandalism.

“Earlier today, our crib installation highlighting the barbaric murder of Kfir Bibas was vandalized on the University of Chicago quadrangles,” MFI wrote. “We are appalled at this inhumane behavior, which shows insensitivity at best, and support at worst, for the slaughter of an innocent nine month old infant whose only crime was being Jewish.”

“This act of hatred does not discourage us, but only motivates our advocacy on campus,” MFI continued. “We are committed to working with the administration and appropriate personnel to penalize the perpetrators of this heinous act. Jewish students can’t look away from antisemitism, and neither should you.”

Over the last year, MFI’s installations have been vandalized or stolen several times. During the pro-Palestine encampment last spring, Israeli flags and pro-Israel signs on the main quad were repeatedly stolen or removed from their approved locations by unknown individuals. At the time, an MFI representative told the Maroon the “desecration of a University-approved installment” was “despicable and shouldn’t be tolerated at the University of Chicago.”

Below is a tweet showing the desecration. This happened, as the article says, repeatedly in the last couple of years, as the pro-Pals continually ripped down expensive Israeli flags and pro-Israel and “bring them home” banners, an illegal act. As far as I know, not a single pro-Palestinian installation was vandalized. So it toes.

But when I looked at the University’s statement condemning the vandalism, which was a good affirmation of free expression on campus, I was amused to see this (my bolding).

The ability of RSOs to display messages of their choice is an important form of free expression on our campus, and vandalizing such installations is never acceptable. The University also does not tolerate harassment directed at individuals or groups.

Maintaining UChicago’s environment of free expression for a wide diversity of perspectives takes unremitting effort on everyone’s behalf. Students in need of support can contact the Dean-on-Call.

The Deans-on-Call here are worse than useless, as they cannot do anything without the permission of the administration. Nothing! And at least some of them don’t even bother to hide their political sympathies towards Palestine. Here’s a photo that a Jewish student took of a Dean-on-Call during the encampment last year (I added the arrow). Look at her “watermelon” fingernails and Palestinian colors. There are pictures of other Deans-on-Call dressed in red, green, white and black during the protests. Seriously, the University shouldn’t allow Deans-on-Call to take sides in such a way.

*Although this BBC headline is ungrammatical, the content is good: “Vending machine for ducks to tackle bread feeding.” (h/t: Matthew)

A special vending machine for feeding ducks appropriate food has been installed in a park after complaints the birds are becoming ill due to people feeding them bread.

It follows a request from volunteers at Burrs Country Park in Bury, Greater Manchester, who have reminded people that bread is bad for ducks’ health and the quality of their water.

The new solar-powered machine, supplied by the Feed The Ducks Initiative, offers £1 portions of healthier alternatives such as barley, oats, peas and chopped lettuce.

Bury councillor Alan Quinn said the council was “delighted” to support the scheme, adding: “Don’t let it be said that we duck the big decisions.”

“Everyone likes to feed the ducks and this initiative will help ensure that the birds are getting a healthy diet,” he said.

The national Feed The Ducks Initiative has been working with local authorities across the country to install the vending machines in a push to reduce bread feeding.

It has pledged to maintain and replenish them with necessary foods.

Users can pay £1 to dispense a handful of duck food, with 90% of costs going towards the initiative’s running costs and the remainder going to the Friends of Burrs Country Park group to help fund events and park maintenance.

A sign on the machine states: “Bread makes ducks ill and does not contain the right nutrition or calories that they need to grow or keep warm.

“Rotting bread pollutes the water and cause nasty surface algae, which kills wildlife and gives ducks diseases.”

Believe me, I’ve had this idea for years. But why pay for a machine and restock it when they’ve got ME to give them a complete diet?

*An update from Jim Batterson on the return to Earth of the two “stranged” astronauts (he doesn’t like “stranded”)

Butch and Suni undocked and pushed away from the ISS just after 1:00 AM EDT this morning as Crew-9 ended its duty on the ISS, turning it over to the recently arrived Crew-10.  The pair left a few days earlier than planned because the weather forecast for the intended splashdown area is unsettled for the end of this week—or at least NASA says.  They have been flying out a protected ellipsoid around station and now, as I write this morning just after 7am EDT, they should be below station and beginning a series of approximately 90-minute orbits that will culminate with the firing of their main deorbit thrusters at 5:11 pm EDT this afternoon, splashing down in the Gulf of Mexico off Florida at 5:57 pm EDT.  Live coverage should start on Space.com and maybe even C-Span (as this very dangerous business has seemed to take on a political tone) at 4:45pm EDT.

There is a good full timeline summary of Butch and Suni’s excellent adventure on Space.com this morning here.
I conclude by saying that NASA, my home for 32 years and my father’s home for 31 years before me (1939-his death in 1970) is dead to me now.  I watched on C-Span last night as the NASA spokesman referred to Butch and Suni as “stranded” and returning to the “Gulf of America”.  This was the official NASA voice using Trump’s words!  So it is over for me, a second generation NASA engineer.  On TWiV, Vince Racaneilo and either Paul Offit or Dan Griffin have said, in talking about public health, that when you mix science and politics, you get politics.  Most recently, one of them observed that when you mix science and politics you get death.  They are very smart people.

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is still studying entomology:

Hili: This insect is annoying.
A: Why does it bother you?
Hili: It’s running back and forth.
In Polish:
Hili: Ten owad jest natrętny.
Ja: Co ci przeszkadza?
Hili: Biega tam i z powrotem.

*******************

Two cat-related photos from reader.  First, one from Peter Hearty in the UK, who says:

Not sure if this counts as a wildlife photo or not, but did you know there’s a giant cat looking down on us from the surface of the moon? Taken in my back garden in Southend-on-Sea, England, 16 Mar 2025.

Here’s reader Simon with his two moggies, all watching the terrific animated movie “Flow”:

From Cat Memes:

From Masih, who apparently was blocked on social media for advocating for a Woman’s March against Muslim theocracies:

From Divy: cats and ducks being cozy:

From Malcolm; a clever way to feed homeless cats:

From my Twitter feed:

And from my BlueHair feed; Larry the Cat, whom I follow:

Wishing a very happy St Patrick’s Day to all of my friends celebrating in Ireland and around the world, especially O’Larry who’s the guard cat at Jameson:

Larry the Cat (@number10cat.bsky.social) 2025-03-17T15:12:16.357Z

From the Auschwitz Memorial, one I reposted:

This Croatian Jewish girl didn't even survive the train journey to Auschwitz. She was 16. Her mother and brother were gassed upon arrival.

Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-03-18T10:31:47.750Z

Two posts from Matthew. Look at this unit! (There are more in the thread):

And another:

And a leucistic coot:

Well, I did not have "Leucistic American Coot" on my Bingo list today. Did anyone? Seen just a bit ago in #WoodlandCA #Birds

Jonathan Eisen (@phylogenomics.bsky.social) 2025-03-17T00:01:14.437Z

Monday: Hili dialogue

March 17, 2025 • 6:45 am

Welcome to a dreary Monday: March 17, 2025: St. Patrick’s Day and National Corned Beef and Cabbage Day.  The latter dish, odiferous but loved by my father, was often on offer at the Coyne dinner table. But I much prefer my corned beef in a sandwich–on rye with hot mustard, as served at Katz’s Deli in New York. As for Saint Paddy’s Day, Chicago is the American city most famous for celebrating it, for once a year they dye the Chicago River a lurid green with a nontoxic dye. It looks like this:

There’s also a Google Doodle celebrating the day; click on it below to see where it goes:

It’s also Act Happy Day and Submarine Day. Here’s why the latter is celebrated today:

On March 17, 1898, St. Patrick’s Day, Irish-born engineer John Philip Holland demonstrated a submarine he designed, the Holland VI, for the U.S. Navy Department, off the coast of Staten Island. During the demonstration, the vessel was submerged for 1 hour and 40 minutes. Holland launched the submarine the year before, on May 17, 1897, after it was built at the Crescent Shipyard in Elizabeth, New Jersey. The submarine was noteworthy for having features that would become the standard for submarines in future years. It and other of Holland’s submarines are also noteworthy for being the first to run on electric batteries when submerged, but on internal combustion engines when on the water’s surface. We celebrate the Holland and all other submarines on March 17 each year.

Here’s the Holland VI, which cost the Navy $150,000

Official U.S. Navy Photograph, now in the collections of the National Archives., Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the March 17 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*Trump ordered large-scale military strikes on the Houthis in Yemen, saying that this was intended as a warning for Iran, who backs the Houthi rebels. And it gives a hint that Trump himself might order strikes on Iran designed to take out their capacity to build nuclear weapons.

The Houthi militia in Yemen has vowed to retaliate after President Trump ordered large-scale military strikes on targets controlled by the group that it says killed at least 31 people.

The group, which is backed by Iran, said that women and children were among those killed in the strikes on Saturday, the most significant U.S. military action in the Middle East since Mr. Trump took office in January.

For more than a year, the Houthis have launched attacks against Israel and threatened commercial shipping in the Red Sea in solidarity with their ally Hamas, which led the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel that set off the war in Gaza.

The U.S. airstrikes targeted Houthi-controlled areas across Yemen, including the capital, Sana, as well as Saada, al-Bayda, Hajjah and Dhamar Provinces, according to reports from Houthi-run media channels. The strikes killed at least 31 people and wounded 101, “most of whom were children and women,” said Anis al-Asbahi, a spokesman for the Houthi-run health ministry.

The casualty figures could not be independently verified, and the United States has not given any estimates for the number of people killed or wounded in the strikes.

. . . The U.S. Central Command, which posted a video of a bomb leveling a building compound in Yemen, said that the United States had employed precision strikes to “defend American interests, deter enemies and restore freedom of navigation.”

U.S. airstrikes also targeted a power facility in the northwestern town of Dahyan, in Saada Province, causing a nightlong electricity blackout, residents said.

. . . . Mr. Trump said in a statement on his Truth Social platform that the strikes were also intended as a warning to Iran, the Houthis’ main backer.

“Support for the Houthi terrorists must end IMMEDIATELY!” he wrote. He also warned Iran against threatening the United States, saying, “America will hold you fully accountable, and we won’t be nice about it!”

*The WaPo reports that both non-Canadian and Canadian foreigners are cancelling trips to the U.S., the former out of fear and the latter out of reprisal. It is, of course, entirely due to Trump, and it hurts Americans in the tourist industry. First, the non-Canadians:

International travelers concerned about President Donald Trump’s trade policies and bellicose rhetoric have been canceling trips to the United States, depriving the U.S. tourism industry of billions of dollars at a time when the economy has started to appear wobbly.

Canadians are skipping trips to Disney World and music festivals. Europeans are eschewing U.S. national parks, and Chinese travelers are vacationing in Australia instead.

International travel to the United States is expected to slide by 5 percent this year, contributing to a $64 billion shortfall for the travel industry, according to Tourism Economics. The research firm had originallyforecast a 9 percent increase in foreign travel, but revised its estimate late last monthto reflect “polarizing Trump Administration policies and rhetoric.”

“There’s been a dramatic shift in our outlook,” said Adam Sacks, president of Tourism Economics. “You’re looking at a much weaker economic engine than what otherwise would’ve been, not just because of tariffs, but the rhetoric and condescending tone around it.”

And the Canadians:

As with any sense of betrayal, there is distress, incomprehension and anger.

Since taking office in January, President Donald Trump has launched broadsides against Canada, America’s closest ally. He has repeatedly said Canada should be the 51st statetalked about erasing the border and started a trade war.

Trump’s rhetoric and actions have left many Canadians baffled and infuriated. Some have responded by canceling their trips to the United States — and in certain cases, they’re writing messages to let Americans know how they feel.

Canadians have sent notes explaining their decisions to U.S. hotels, tourism agencies and elected officials. “The hurt is what comes through the most,” said Heather Pelham, a Vermont tourism official who estimates that her office has received about two dozen such missives.

It’s not just individuals changing their plans, but also school districtslaw firms, businesses and nonprofits. While it’s too soon to say how large or enduring the effect of such cancellations will be, they’ve already shown up in airline data.

Flight Center Travel Group Canada, one of the country’s largest travel agencies, said that over the past three months, about 20 percent of preexisting leisure trips to the United States were canceled. In February, bookings to the United States by Canadian vacationers fell 40 percent compared to the same month last year. Both figures are unprecedented in the agency’s 30-year history apart from during the pandemic, said Amra Durakovic, a company spokeswoman.

This is all sad, and I want to tell foreigners, “Hey, we’re not all like that!”  It’s worse with Canada since Trump has stupidly said he’ll make it our 51st state, and you can imagine how that resonates with Canadians. And most Americans LIKE Canadians and laugh at the “51st state” trope.  The only upside is that maybe if enough Republicans get burned by Trump’s policies like this, Vance won’t be elected President in 2028.

*Speaking of which, Trump continues to deport immigrants who, he says, were criminals, even though I don’t think we have that evidence for many of these. And this despite a federal judge’s order:

The Trump administration has transferred hundreds of immigrants to El Salvador even as a federal judge issued an order temporarily barring the deportations under an 18th century wartime declaration targeting Venezuelan gang members, officials said Sunday. Flights were in the air at the time of the ruling.

U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg issued an order Saturday blocking the deportations but lawyers told him there were already two planes with migrants in the air — one headed for El Salvador, the other for Honduras. Boasberg verbally ordered the planes be turned around, but they apparently were not and he did not include the directive in his written order.

“Oopsie…Too late, Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, a Trump ally who agreed to house about 300 migrants for a year at a cost of $6 million in his country’s prisons, wrote on the social media site X above an article about Boasberg’s ruling. That post was recirculated by White House communications director Steven Cheung.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who negotiated an earlier deal with Bukele to house migrants, posted on the site: “We sent over 250 alien enemy members of Tren de Aragua which El Salvador has agreed to hold in their very good jails at a fair price that will also save our taxpayer dollars.”

The law, invoked during World Wars I and II and the War of 1812, requires a president to declare the United States is at war, giving him extraordinary powers to detain or remove foreigners who otherwise would have protections under immigration or criminal laws. It was last used to justify the detention of Japanese-American civilians during World War II.

The ACLU, which filed the lawsuit that led to Boasberg’s temporary restraining order on deportations, said it was asking the government whether the removals to El Salvador were in defiance of the court.

“Oopsie”?  To be sent to a place where you’ve never lived? If that’s to be done, it has to be done legally, after a court decision. I heard yesterday on NPR that Trump had even mentioned sending American criminals to Honduras. Now that is without a doubt illegal.  The man knows no limits.

*The Wall Street Journal announced that “There’s a good chance that your kid uses AI to cheat.”  It’s easy!

A high-school senior from New Jersey doesn’t want the world to know that she cheated her way through English, math and history classes last year.

Yet her experience, which the 17-year-old told The Wall Street Journal with her parent’s permission, shows how generative AI has rooted in America’s education system, allowing a generation of students to outsource their schoolwork to software with access to the world’s knowledge.

Educators see benefits to using artificial intelligence in the classroom. Yet teachers and parents are left on their own to figure out how to stop students from using the technology to short-circuit learning. Companies providing AI tools offer little help.

The New Jersey student told the Journal why she used AI for dozens of assignments last year: Work was boring or difficult. She wanted a better grade. A few times, she procrastinated and ran out of time to complete assignments.

The student turned to OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini, to help spawn ideas and review concepts, which many teachers allow. More often, though, AI completed her work. Gemini solved math homework problems, she said, and aced a take-home test. ChatGPT did calculations for a science lab. It produced a tricky section of a history term paper, which she rewrote to avoid detection.

The student was caught only once.

Around 400 million people use ChatGPT every week, OpenAI said. Students are the most common users, according to the company, which offers a free version and advanced services costing as much as $200 a month. OpenAI hopes students will get into a lifelong habit of consulting ChatGPT whenever they have a question, a role played by Google for almost three decades.

Of students who reported using AI, nearly 40% of those in middle and high schools said they employed it without teachers’ permission to complete assignments, according to a survey last year by Impact Research. Among college students who use AI, the figure was nearly half. An internal analysis published by OpenAI said ChatGPT was frequently used by college students to help write papers.

I wish there were a way to embed the use of AI programs in text, like a written watermark, to identify cheaters. But I don’t see how that could be done. And note below that it’s getting almost impossible to detect, even using detection programs. If this goes on, grades, already inflated, will become more and more meaningless.

Carter Wright, a high-school English teacher outside of Houston, Texas, said he has spent hours chasing AI plagiarism, using free trials of detector software and checking edit histories in students’ Google Docs. His students always seemed always one step ahead.

“It’s almost impossible for me to stop all the cheating unless we were to completely get rid of the technology,” Wright said.

*And from the BBC, an example of how every bit of popular culture has to be sanitized these days. The article is “Will Snow White be a ‘victim of its moment?’ How the Disney remake became 2025’s most divisive film.” I had no idea!

You wouldn’t think that the war in Gaza would have much impact on a Disney remake. But the live-action Snow White, a revamped version of the 1937 animated classic Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, has become a flashpoint for social and political divisions, even before its global release next week.

There was some backlash to the casting of Rachel Zegler, of Colombian descent, as the heroine. More recently, there has been blowback both about Zegler’s pro-Palestinian comments and about pro-Israel comments by Israeli actress Gal Gadot, who plays Snow White’s stepmother, the Evil Queen. And there is an ongoing debate about whether there should have been dwarfs at all, live or CGI. The film’s director, Marc Webb, said in Disney’s official production notes, “I think all good stories evolve over time. They become reflections of the world that we live in”. He has likely got more than he bargained for, as reactions to Snow White inadvertently reflect the most polarised aspects of the world today. Like political rhetoric in countries around the world, responses to the film’s production have been loud, irate and sometimes ugly.

Oh for crying out loud! Do politics really have to cause such a ruckus in art?  You’re supposed to suspend disbelief!  There’s more!

Snow White has been in the works since 2019, and began in earnest with Zegler’s casting in 2021. Since then attacks on its so-called “wokeness” have proliferated, making the film a lightning rod for opinions that have little to do with the fairy tale it is based on. A recent Hollywood Reporter article asked, “Have some PR missteps combined with anti-woke outrage turned marketing the film into a poisoned apple?” And alongside such measured reporting there have been heated responses in the media. The editorial board of the New York Post – owned by Rupert Murdoch, the conservative mogul whose company also owns Fox News – weighed in this week, declaring the film a financial disaster before it has opened, writing: “Disney ‘Snow White’ controversy proves it again: Go woke, go broke!”

The original film needed an update if it was going to be remade at all. In its day it set a high bar for Disney’s future animated films, but it also introduced the song Someday My Prince Will Come, blighting the expectations of generations of girls by setting them up to wait for a Prince Charming to make their lives complete. Meanwhile, Snow White happily sweeps the floor for the dwarfs until he shows up to rescue her with a kiss after she bites the Queen’s poisoned apple. Soon after her casting announcement, Zegler told the television show Extra that in the old Snow White “there was a big focus on her love story with a guy who literally stalks her”. In fact, the original film states that he “searched far and wide” to find her after falling in love at first sight, and he disappears for most of the film, so no need to take that comment too seriously. Zegler was excited and laughing when she said it

Some people also rejected the idea that a Latina actress could play a character called Snow White; alongside criticisms of such non-traditional casting, Zegler was subject to racist trolling. This was a similar reaction to that experienced by the black actress Halle Bailey when she was cast as Ariel in 2023’s The Little Mermaid.

The film stumbled into more trouble simply because its lead actresses expressed political opinions. On X in August 2024, Zegler thanked fans for the response to the Snow White trailer, adding, “and always remember, free Palestine”.

Gadot has posted her support for Israel on social media, and especially since the 7 October attacks by Hamas has been outspoken in defence of her country and against anti-semitism. That led to some short-lived calls by pro-Palestinian social media users to boycott the film simply because she is in it.

And then there are the dwarfs. Ableism! But real people with dwarfism are complaining about losing roles because Disney’s new dwarfs are CGI (“computer-generated imagery”).  Bolding below is mine:

Even when people reacting to the film have agreed on a basic principle, like more opportunities for actors who have dwarfism, they have disagreed on how to get there. Peter Dinklage, perhaps the world’s most well-known actor with dwarfism, questioned the entire project before many details were known, calling the 1937 film “a backwards story of seven dwarfs living in a cave together”. Disney announced the next day, “To avoid reinforcing stereotypes from the original animated film, we are taking a different approach with these seven characters.”

As it turned out, the seven characters are CGI, and Disney has reclassifed them as “magical creatures”, not dwarfs. What do they look like? Even a glimpse at the trailer reveals that they look exactly like CGI dwarfs. They are still named Happy, Grumpy, Sleepy, Sneezy, Doc, Bashful and Dopey.

The changes have caused a backlash from some people with dwarfism, who have rebutted Dinklage and accused Disney of depriving them of acting roles. As recently as this week, one told the Daily Mail, “I think Disney is trying too hard to be politically correct, but in doing so it’s damaging our careers and opportunities.”

If stuff like this is going on (and it should be waning if wokeness is waning), then all art will be leveled out into anodyne, inoffensive pablum. And you ask why I’m depressed!

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Kulka and Hili and squabbling again. Hili blames Kulka!

Kulka: Do we have to fight with each other?
Hili: It’s not me who is the aggressor.
In Polish:
Kulka: Czy musimy ze sobą walczyć?
Hili: To nie ja jestem agresorem.

*******************

From Cat Memes. Put those marshmallows in a S’more and toast them!

From the Absurd Sign Project:

From The Language Nerds:

From Masih, who loves the Kurds but hates Iran:

From Jez (a Brit), who adds, “Doesn’t say much for the British media’s coverage of the conflict.”

From Luana. The problem is really quite bad in California:

From Malcolm, a passel of adorable kittens:

From my feed, a pissed-off Amazon driver:

From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I retweeted:

17 March 1937 | A French Jewish girl, Michel Erdelyi, was born in Rouen.She arrived at #Auschwitz on 13 February 1943 in a transport of 998 Jews deported from Drancy. She was among 802 people murdered after selection in a gas chambers.

Auschwitz Memorial (@auschwitzmemorial.bsky.social) 2025-03-17T03:00:05.742Z

Two posts from Dr. Cobb. Matthew says this first one is true:

The Beginning and End of Philosophyexistentialcomics.com/comic/593

Existential Comics (@existentialcomics.com) 2025-03-10T16:13:50.904Z

It took me a while to get this one:

Yes I have.

Matthew Cobb (@matthewcobb.bsky.social) 2025-03-12T15:50:18.790Z

Sunday: Hili dialogue

March 16, 2025 • 6:45 am

Welcome to the Sabbath for goyische cats: Sunday, March 16, 2025, and National Panda Day.  Here are some your specimens on display: 25 young pandas making their first appearance this year at the China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda (CCRCGP) and the Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding in southwest China’s Sichuan Province. I once visited the Chengdu Research Base and got to lightly pet a sleeping panda.  Is there any cuter animal?

It’s also National Corn Dog Day (didn’t we just have that?), Freedom of Information Day, Buzzard Day, Curlew Day, and National Artichoke Heart Day.

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the March 16 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*A federal court has blocked Trump’s attempt to deport Venezuelans, with the deportees reported to be gang members.

A federal judge on Saturday ordered the Trump administration to cease use of an obscure wartime law to deport Venezuelans without a hearing, saying that any planes that had departed the United States with immigrants under the law needed to return.

As of early Sunday morning, it was unclear whether any such planes had departed or returned.

On Saturday, the administration published an executive order invoking the law, the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, to target Venezuelan gang members in the United States.

But shortly after the announcement, James E. Boasberg, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., said he would issue a temporary order blocking the government from deporting any immigrants under the law.

In a hastily scheduled hearing, he said he did not believe the law offered grounds for the president’s action, and he ordered any flights that had departed with Venezuelan immigrants under the executive order to return to the United States “however that’s accomplished — whether turning around the plane or not.”

This will surely wind up, along with all the other contested deportations, in the Supreme Court.

*Andrew Sullivan’s Weekly Dish column is called “The return of the McCarthyites“, with the subtitle, “Trump and Vance say they are for free speech. Yeah, right.” And he’s with me that Mahmoud Khalil’s speech doesn’t warrant deportation:

It’s important to note that this is not about protection from woke professors or ideologically captured deans. It’s protection from direct surveillance by the federal government. The Trump administration has launched a massive, all-of-government, AI-assisted program called “Catch and Revoke,” which will scan every social media comment and anything online they can use to flush out any noncitizen who might be seen as anti-Semitic or anti-Zionist or anti-Israel or indeed just getting on Marco Rubio’s wrong side.

Mahmoud Khalil, a green card holder, has not been accused of a crime. And that is the point. A White House official explained: “The allegation here is not that [Khalil] was breaking the law.” A DHS spokesman elaborated to NPR:

“We’ve invited and allowed the student to come into the country, and he’s put himself in the middle of the process of basically pro-Palestinian activity. And at this point, like I said, the Secretary of State can review his visa process at any point and revoke it.”

“Pro-Palestinian activity” is the reason. The DHS document citing the law being used against Khalil — and thereby potentially every other noncitizen, including green card holders — has this legal formula:

[T]he Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe that your presence or activities in the United States would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.

Note the astonishing breadth of this legal formula. You could, for example, be a Ukrainian exile who furiously opposes the Trump administration’s new policy toward Russia. Under the Rubio standard, if you do not have citizenship, merely expressing your views in a way that jeopardizes US foreign policy interests is now a deportable offense. The Trump administration, unless a court stops them, has effectively removed the First Amendment from tens of millions of inhabitants of this country.

It’s actually worse: if you merely potentially could say such a thing, you can be deported for a pre-crime, or rather pre-noncrime. Every noncitizen in the US now has to watch what they say about foreign policy — or else. You may have just arrived from Putin’s Russia, and are now being told by Trump: don’t think you now have free speech just because you’re in America. The US government is monitoring your every word and can deport you if you say the wrong thing. You have to wait until you’re a citizen to be free.

. . . .The White House mocked him from their X account: “SHALOM, MAHMOUD.” Take a second to absorb that monstrosity: the glib and spiteful use of a Jewish term for goodbye to a Muslim. And not from some nasty X nutter. From the president who is supposed to represent all of us, but is, in fact, a deranged, bigoted troll.

I’m going to pause now for the unnecessary paragraph that is yet somehow necessary. I despise Hamas for its North Korean-level brainwashing of children, its Nazi-level anti-Semitism, and its barbaric use of women and children as human shields. I have absolutely no time for campus protests that go over the line into intimidation of other students. If crimes have been committed, I have no problem prosecuting. But offensive speech? It’s allowed in America. Handing out fliers? It’s how America began! A campus can (and should) discipline its students; but the federal government intervening to seize a legal resident and trying to deport him for speech — along with a dragnet for finding others to throw out — is an outrage in a free country.

Can the Trump administration win this fight? I suspect they can. Rubio says he intends to deport any noncitizen who merely “supports Hamas” — not materially supports, but just supports Hamas — and not just in the past, but in the future.

I’m going to pause now for the unnecessary paragraph that is yet somehow necessary. I despise Hamas for its North Korean-level brainwashing of children, its Nazi-level anti-Semitism, and its barbaric use of women and children as human shields. I have absolutely no time for campus protests that go over the line into intimidation of other students. If crimes have been committed, I have no problem prosecuting. But offensive speech? It’s allowed in America. Handing out fliers? It’s how America began! A campus can (and should) discipline its students; but the federal government intervening to seize a legal resident and trying to deport him for speech — along with a dragnet for finding others to throw out — is an outrage in a free country.

Can the Trump administration win this fight? I suspect they can. Rubio says he intends to deport any noncitizen who merely “supports Hamas” — not materially supports, but just supports Hamas — and not just in the past, but in the future.

Sullivan asserts that “the reason this is happening is because the government being assailed on American campuses and streets is not any government, and not even the American government, but the government of Israel. It’s part of a much broader campaign to chill criticism of the Jewish state.” Okay, I’ll grant that this is the motivation, but there are those of us who will defend any speech, like Khalil’s, so long as it is First-Amendment protected, no matter how much we dislike it. He adds, “As for all those brave center-right defenders of free speech on campus these last few years? Just see if they are condemning this. And if they aren’t, never take them seriously on this subject again.”  I am condemning it, though I deny being a “center-right defender of free speech.” Not all defenders of free speech, my dear Mr. Sullivan, are on the Right.

*I hadn’t realized that Daniel Kahneman had died, nor that he died by assisted suicide in Switzerland (probably at the Dignitas facility). The WSJ gives the details in a post called “The last decision by the world’s leading thinker on decisions.” An excerpt (article is archived here).

n mid-March 2024, Daniel Kahneman flew from New York to Paris with his partner, Barbara Tversky, to unite with his daughter and her family. They spent days walking around the city, going to museums and the ballet, and savoring soufflés and chocolate mousse. Around March 22, Kahneman, who had turned 90 that month, also started emailing a personal message to several dozen of the people he was closest to.

On March 26, Kahneman left his family and flew to Switzerland. His email explained why:


This is a goodbye letter I am sending friends to tell them that I am on my way to Switzerland, where my life will end on March 27. 


Kahneman was one of the world’s most influential thinkers—a psychologist at Princeton University, winner of the Nobel Prize in economics and author of the international blockbuster “Thinking, Fast and Slow,” first published in 2011. He had spent his long career studying the imperfections and inconsistencies of human decision-making. By most accounts—although not his own—Kahneman was still in reasonably good physical and mental health when he chose to die.

He doesn’t appear to have had a fatal illness, either, though he said his “kidneys were on their last legs.” And so he went to his death still fairly healthy:

I think Danny wanted, above all, to avoid a long decline, to go out on his terms, to own his own death. Maybe the principles of good decision-making that he had so long espoused—rely on data, don’t trust most intuitions, view the evidence in the broadest possible perspective—had little to do with his decision.

His friends and family say that Kahneman’s choice was purely personal; he didn’t endorse assisted suicide for anyone else and never wished to be viewed as advocating it for others.

Kahneman didn’t want that to happen to him. His final email went on to indicate that he felt that it soon would:


I have believed since I was a teenager that the miseries and indignities of the last years of life are superfluous, and I am acting on that belief. 

He seems to have focused intently on another issue. As the next paragraph of Kahneman’s final email said:


Not surprisingly, some of those who love me would have preferred for me to wait until it is obvious that my life is not worth extending. But I made my decision precisely because I wanted to avoid that state, so it had to appear premature. I am grateful to the few with whom I shared early, who all reluctantly came round to support me.


I often think that this way of going is sensible: avoid the long, painful, and inevitable decline. And then I think that I really want to be around to see what happens next. I have not nearly reached the point when I think my desire to see what happens is outweighed by my decrepitude. Indeed, I wonder if that day will even come, and I’ll at least keep reading (so many books!), even as I fall apart in a hospital bed.

*Trump is considering restricting travel to America from 43 countries, and banning anybody coming from eleven of them:

The Trump administration is considering targeting the citizens of as many as 43 countries as part of a new ban on travel to the United States that would be broader than the restrictions imposed during President Trump’s first term, according to officials familiar with the matter.

A draft list of recommendations developed by diplomatic and security officials suggests a “red” list of 11 countries whose citizens would be flatly barred from entering the United States. They are Afghanistan, Bhutan, Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen, the officials said.

. . .The officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive internal deliberations, cautioned that the list had been developed by the State Department several weeks ago, and that changes were likely by the time it reached the White House.

Officials at embassies and in regional bureaus at the State Department, and security specialists at other departments and intelligence agencies, have been reviewing the draft. They are providing comment about whether descriptions of deficiencies in particular countries are accurate or whether there are policy reasons — like not risking disruption to cooperation on some other priority — to reconsider including some.

The draft proposal also included an “orange” list of 10 countries for which travel would be restricted but not cut off. In those cases, affluent business travelers might be allowed to enter, but not people traveling on immigrant or tourist visas.

Citizens on that list would also be subjected to mandatory in-person interviews in order to receive a visa. It included Belarus, Eritrea, Haiti, Laos, Myanmar, Pakistan, Russia, Sierra Leone, South Sudan and Turkmenistan.

Here’s the entire list:

Now I get North Korea, Iran, and Syria, but not every other country on the red list, as I can envision good reasons for visitors to come here, like a Cuban who wants to collaborate with an American biologists (we send plenty of our scientists over there).  And BHUTAN, for crying out loud? The happiest country in the world? What could be the reason for that?

*Trump is dismantling even more federal agencies, including two that are dear to my heart: the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe.

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order seeking to eliminate several additional federal agencies, including one that oversees the federally funded media outlet Voice of America (VOA), testing the limits of his authoritative power as he seeks to shrink the size and scope of the federal bureaucracy.

One order signed Friday night calls for the agencies — some of which are focused on minority business enterprises, museum and library services and homelessness prevention — to “be eliminated to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law.”

It also instructs the heads of agencies to “reduce the performance of their statutory functions and associated personnel to the minimum presence and function required by law,” and submit a report to the Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought confirming full compliance within seven days.

second executive order revoked 19 executive actions signed by President Joe Biden that promoted clean energy and environmental goals. The order terminates proclamations of national monuments created by Biden and ends the use of the Defense Production Act to expand the U.S. manufacturing of clean energy technology (including mandates for electric heat pumps and solar panels), among other Biden-era policies.

In a White House statement, Trump claimed the rules stem from “radical ideology” and were wasteful. One of the regulations that Trump canceled mandated a $15-an-hour minimum wage for federal contractors.

. . . . The U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM) — the parent of VOA, Office of Cuba Broadcasting, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Radio Free Asia — is a congressionally chartered and independent agency, and Congress passed a law in 2020 intended to limit the power of the agency’s presidentially appointed chief executive.

The order also targets other lesser-known but broadly impactful agencies such as the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, a nonpartisan global policy think tank; the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which supports and funds libraries, archives and museums in every state; Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, which focuses on labor disputes; the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund, which centers on economically distressed communities; and the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness.

Well, I remember the VOA and RFE when they broadcast independent news (not propaganda) to behind the Iron Curtain, and many people risked imprisonment for listening to them. Perhaps their days are over now that Communist Europe is largely gone, but those other agencies–the ones that promote clean energy, libraries, and museums–are they superfluous?  Trump and Musk wield sharp knives, and they wield them widely.

*A guy just won $50 MILLION in a lawsuit against Starbucks when a cup of their hot tea spilled into his lap. Before you start saying that’s ridiculous, consider the circumstances:

 A delivery driver has won $50 million in a lawsuit after being seriously burned when a Starbucks drink spilled in his lap at a California drive-through, court records show.

A Los Angeles County jury found Friday for Michael Garcia, who underwent skin grafts and other procedures on his genitals after a venti-sized tea drink spilled instants after he collected it on Feb. 8, 2020. He has suffered permanent and life-changing disfigurement, according to his attorneys.

Garcia’s negligence lawsuit blamed his injuries on Starbucks, saying that an employee didn’t wedge the scalding-hot tea firmly enough into a takeout tray.

“This jury verdict is a critical step in holding Starbucks accountable for flagrant disregard for customer safety and failure to accept responsibility,” one of Garcia’s attorneys, Nick Rowley, said in a statement.

Starbucks said it sympathized with Garcia but planned to appeal.

“We disagree with the jury’s decision that we were at fault for this incident and believe the damages awarded to be excessive,” the Seattle-based coffee giant said in a statement to media outlets, adding that it was “committed to the highest safety standards” in handling hot drinks.

U.S. eateries have faced lawsuits before over customer burns.

In one famous 1990s case, a New Mexico jury awarded a woman nearly $3 million in damages for burns she suffered while trying to pry the lid off a cup of coffee at a McDonald’s drive-through. A judge later reduced the award, and the case ultimately was settled for an undisclosed sum under $600,000.

Yes, that’s a bad injury, but in the end Starbuck’s is being sued for serving tea so hot that it could burn someone’s genitalia.  I’m not so sure that warrants a penalty of $50 million. And aren’t you supposed to be careful with drinks in cars?

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili thinks the flower are better on the other side of the fence:

Hili: Are our crocuses in bloom?
Andrzej: Our neighbours’ have been in bloom for a week but here they are just starting.
Hili: Discrimination.
In Polish
Hili: Czy nasze krokusy już kwitną?
Ja: U sąsiadów kwitną od tygodnia, a nasze dopiero zaczynają.
Hili: Dyskryminacja.

*******************

From the Absurd Sign Project:

From Cat Memes. Would you eat this?

From The 2025 Darwin Awards!!!/EpicFails:

From Masih, yet another brave Iranian woman:

From Malgorzata: This is at the University of Chicago, and it’s not good at all. This was certainly an approved installation, a memorial for the youngest Bibas child, who was murdered by Hamas as a hostage.  What horrible people these Chicago vandals are!  They really need to put cameras on stuff like this, or have a 24-hour watch on it.

Via Luana: The APA should be embarrassed. There are ONLY two sexes in all animals, for crying out loud:

From Reese: click to go to the totally adorable Substack video:

From my feed:

From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I reposted:

A French Jewish girl gassed to death upon arriving at Auschwitz. She was seven.

Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-03-16T10:13:57.416Z

Two posts from Professor Cobb. First, all kinds of animals on the farm:

Greetings and good morning it’s the Saturday farm rush hour with Mo & Emerald #rushhour

Chris, Caroline, Kara (@caenhillcc.bsky.social) 2025-03-15T09:03:58.872Z

Kakapos are the world’s only flightless parrot, with nearly all of them isolated on a predator-free environment in New Zealand. This sad post links to an article suggesting that they once were very widespread but were devastated by introduced Pacific rats between the 13th and 19th centuries.

Once widespread, now critically endangered: New study shows kākāpō are the 4th most common bird in NZ's late-Quaternary deposits (>1351 individuals from 274 sites), and occupied all forests and adjacent habitats, on the NZ mainland prior to human settlement authors.elsevier.com/c/1klUo-4PSD…

Jamie Wood (@larusnz.bsky.social) 2025-03-12T23:18:42.412Z

Saturday: Hili dialogue

March 15, 2025 • 6:45 am

Welcome to a CaturSaturday: it’s  March 15, 2025: the Ides of March. But for Jewish cats it’s the Idle of March, as they relax and read scripture on shabbos. And it’s National Egg Cream Day, celebrating a drink associated with Jewish areas of New York. This drink contains neither egg nor cream, but consists of seltzer, milk, and chocolate syrup, traditionally Fox’s U-Bet Chocolate Syrup. Here’s a finished one. I don’t know how this got invented, but it’s good, though now hard to get in New York City. Here’s Gem Spa, THE place to get the iconic egg cream, and I’ve had one there. If you’re in NYC, you have to get one!

It’s also National Corndog Day, Maple Syrup Saturday (be sure to buy the darkest one you can find), Natonal Peanut Lovers Day, Play the Recorder Day (see below) and National Pears Hélène Day.

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the March 15 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*I’m surprised, but Columbia University has disciplined more of its students who engaged in illegal protests last year. (h/t Jez)

Columbia University has expelled or suspended some students who took over a campus building during pro-Palestinian protests last spring and temporarily revoked the diplomas of others who have since graduated, officials said Thursday.

The university said in a campus-wide email that a judicial board brought a range of sanctions against students who occupied Hamilton Hall last spring to protest the war in Gaza.

Columbia did not provide a breakdown of how many students were expelled, were suspended or had their degrees revoked, but it said the outcomes were based on an “evaluation of the severity of behaviors.”

The culmination of the monthslong investigative process comes as the university is reeling from the arrest of a well-known Palestinian campus activist, Mahmoud Khalil, by federal immigration authorities last Saturday. President Donald Trump has said the arrest would be the “first of many” such detentions.

At the same time, the Trump administration has stripped the university of more than $400 million in federal funds over what it calls a failure to combat campus antisemitism. Congressional Republicans have pointed specifically to a failure to discipline students involved in the Hamilton Hall seizure as proof of inaction by the university.

Now we’ll leave aside what the meaning of “temporarily revoked diplomas” is, but it’s clear Columbia is doing it to get back the $400 million in federal dosh withheld by the administration (see the demands that the government levied on Columbia in the tweet below). It shouldn’t be necessary for it to reduce the anti-Semitic atmosphere without that pressure, though.

*As usual, I’m stealing a few items from Nellie Bowles’s snarky news/humor column in The Free Press, called this week, “TGIF: Everything’s computer“:

→ MAHA™: RFK Jr. went to a Steak ’n Shake with Fox News this week and proceeded to do an infomercial. This is the infomercial presidency, and every news hit comes with a promo code. In this country, it’s always 3 a.m. on the Home Shopping Network.

RFK: Steak ’n Shake just switched out and people are raving about these french fries, you taste them.
Sean Hannity: They’re amazing, they really are.

RFK, a little later: You taste these, it’s a completely different experience. The customers are raving about it. Steak ’n Shake has been great. We’re very grateful for them, for RFK’ing the french fries. They turned me into a verb.
Hannity: By the way, a plastic straw, thank god.

And it looks like someone ghostwrote RFK Jr.’s suspiciously pro-measles vaccine op-ed last week (you can rest easy knowing it absolutely was not me). Because here he is now: “It used to be, when you and I were kids, everybody got measles. And measles gave you lifetime protection against measles infection. The vaccine doesn’t do that. . . it used to be very young kids. . . they were protected by breast milk, and by maternal immunity. Women who get vaccinated do not provide that level of maternal immunity.” This administration is all about two steps forward, three steps back.

He says these things and then won’t own it, so it’s very hard to honestly debate or even properly make fun. Call him anti–measles vax, and there would be uproar from his community that he’s not anti-vax, no, no, just aware, alert, poly-vax-ual. It’s always: “I’m pro–measles vaccine, but also measles is a lie and the vaccine destroys the mother-child bond.” He speaks in riddles wrapped in conundrums. He is MAHA but also Steak ’n Shake and plastic. It’s crystals, but AI. I can’t live like this.

→ Cops are here to check on your religious status: Two uniformed police officers in Toronto, sitting before a Toronto Police logo, talked about how beautiful it is that so many people are “reverting” to Islam post–October 7 (Muslims believe we are all by default Muslim, so conversion is called reversion). Something about these guys in their official cop uniforms is extra alarming. It all feels a little Sharia-esque. And for good measure, in Cincinnati, the rabbi who runs a progressive Reform synagogue was disinvited from an anti-Nazi rally. See, he’s not anti-Zionist. Because it’s really, really hard to be Jewish and also think Jews don’t have a deep connection to Israel, since there’s so much about it in the Torah (the Old Testament, to my WASP friends out there). Tricky. Jerusalem is genuinely in so many prayers. Zion is too. Oh, Zion this. Oh, Zion that. Maybe in our davening it could be replaced with Park Slope or South Beach, but it’s not quite as evocative. Or, as the officers at my door suggest, you could simply revert.

→ I guess we all need to watch Snow White: Disney reportedly canceled the London premiere of its live-action remake of Snow White after fears of provoking an anti-woke backlash. The star, Rachel Zegler, has called the original Snow White plot “dated” and “weird,” which honestly, I’m sure it is. The big, beautiful moment is when the prince kisses our princess while she is in a coma. Where is the affirmative consent, sir? And how come all those dwarfs are giving advice? Do they have MSWs? The new Snow White is about “women being in roles of power,” which sounds weirdly like Meghan’s podcast.

What’s happening is this: We’re in an awkward transitional moment between two cultures right now, and movies take a while to make. So the old woke culture will still sputter out a few of these moralistic tales for the next year or two, movies where no jokes can be made, movies where the character whose whole thing was jumping is replaced by a character in a wheelchair and there’s no explanation. Captain America starring a man who says the character shouldn’t represent America, a bad place. That sort of thing. Soon, we will arrive into the new culture. Soon, we will enter the right-wing movie era, where diversity is that the female costar has a brunette best friend, who, at 135 pounds, is cast as hilariously fat. In the new movies it’s just a slow scroll of lines of code and the guys who get it get it, you know? Movies in 2026 will have mandatory quotas but it’s just for Chads of different heights. Soon, the women in roles of power will also be in comas.

*Because of funding cuts, the University of Massachusetts has rescinded every offer to its incoming biomedical class for the fall. (h/t Phil)

With federal research funding imperiled by brutal cuts under the Trump administration, biomedical graduate programs nationwide are making tough decisions that will scale back the next generation of scientists.

On Wednesday, news broke that UMass Chan Medical School—a public school in the University of Massachusetts system—has rescinded all offers of admission to biomedical graduate students for the 2025–2026 school year. That means an entire class of future scientists has been wiped out. Those who were initially accepted to the program can try to join again in a future cycle under a priority consideration that won’t require them to reapply, according to a letter sent to a previously admitted student that was shared on social media.

In a statement provided to NBC10 Boston, a spokesperson for the school confirmed that several dozen applicants had their acceptance offers rescinded. “With uncertainties related to the funding of biomedical research in this country, this difficult decision was made to ensure that our current students’ progress is not disrupted by the funding cuts and that we avoid matriculating students who may not have robust opportunities for dissertation research,” the statement reads.

Rachael Sirianni, a biomedical engineer in the Department of Neurological Surgery at UMass Chan Medical School who works on treatments for pediatric brain tumors, called the situation “heartbreaking.” Writing on Bluesky, Sirianni called it “a terrible loss for students. But it’s also a loss for all of science. Science *runs* on grad student labor.” But, she added: “Public medical schools have no other choice; there is no other source of funding, and everyone in academia is at extreme risk right now.”

. . . . UMass is the latest biomedical graduate program to make news for cutbacks amid the Trump administration’s new policies. The administration has halted new grant funding and is trying to radically cut support for so-called “indirect” research costs, which cover maintaining laboratory space and administrative functions, among other things. The cut has been temporarily put on hold amid a legal battle.

The article goes on to describe funding cuts at Duke, Vanderbilt, Penn, and other schools. It’s not a good time to be doing science, and I feel sorry for the new generation of STEM students coming up.  But I’m getting a bit more optimistic that Vance will not succeed Trump, so perhaps these policies might end in a few years.

*A Canadian nurse was found guilty of professional misconduct because she supposedly harmed transgender people by saying things like people cannot change their sex, or that she doesn’t believe people “are born in the wrong bodies.” The report, while not penalizing the nurse for saying there are only two sexes in humans, does deny that in its report (see below; h/t Enrico, note that the link goes to the law center that defended her):

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is disappointed that the Disciplinary Panel of the British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives, in a decision released today, has found nurse Amy Hamm guilty of professional misconduct for statements made about sexuality and gender in various articles. This decision will negatively impact the freedom of expression of regulated professionals in British Columbia and across Canada.

The panel found professional misconduct in relation to four items where Ms. Hamm expressly identified herself as a nurse while making “discriminatory and derogatory” comments. The Panel found that describing herself as a nurse in the biography attached to three articles she had written, and in one podcast, was enough to create a connection to her profession which brought her under the purview of the regulator.

In September 2020, Amy Hamm, a Vancouver-area nurse, co-sponsored a billboard that read, “I ♥ JK Rowling,” referring to the British author’s public defence of women’s right to female-only spaces, such as prisons and crisis centres, restrooms and changerooms, and sporting events.

A Vancouver city councillor publicly condemned the billboard on social media, prompting the advertising company, Pattison Billboards, to quickly remove it. The sign was up for just 30 hours, but it had already been defaced with paint balls by the time it was taken down.

A self-proclaimed “social justice activist” complained to the British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives (BCCNM) that Ms. Hamm was transphobic and, therefore, unfit to be a nurse. The complaint called for Ms. Hamm to be barred from her current and all future nursing positions. A second, anonymous complaint against Ms. Hamm accused her of “promoting and stoking hate speech towards trans and gender-diverse communities.”

Thus began Ms. Hamm’s more than four-year ordeal with the BCCNM. The matter was referred to the College’s Inquiry Committee for further investigation, which resulted in a 332-page report on Ms. Hamm’s tweets, articles, and other online activities. The report led to a citation (or charge) against Ms. Hamm that her allegedly “discriminatory and derogatory statements” constituted professional misconduct. There followed more than 20 days of disciplinary hearings starting in September 2022 and ending in March 2024.

(The BCCNM’s closing arguments can be read here. Amy Hamm’s closing arguments can be read here. The BCCNM’s reply can be read here.)

Here’s something from the ruling itself: a denial of the fact that there are two sexes.
The Panel understands that the statement that there are only two sexes – female and male – is an oversimplification that does not align with current medical or biological understanding. However, the Panel is also cognizant of the fact that most people, who do not have Dr. Bauer’s expertise, would consider there to be only two se xes. Stating there are only two sexes is not, in itself, discriminatory or derogatory to transgender people as it does not preclude the possibility of a transgender person transitioning to the opposite sex; rather, it is those statements which foreclose the possibility that a person assigned male at birth can transition to the female sex, or vice versa, that constitute discriminatory exclusion and erasure. The Panel therefore finds that the statement that there are only two sexes, without more, does not meet the threshold for discrimination.

I am not going to judge whether Ms. Hamm really did violate professional standards of conduct, but I do claim that the College of Midwives and Nurses doesn’t know much about biological sex, and that it’s wrong in saying that people can actually transition to their non-natal sex.

*A few days ago it looked as if the government would shut down because there weren’t enough votes in the Senate (and by that I mean Democratic votes) to allow a temporary budget bill to pass). Now it looks like it will, but that has exposed a generational divide among Democrats.  UPDATE: the bill passed narrowly yesterday: 54-46. The Dems who voted for the bill:

Democrats joining Mr. Schumer in voting to move it forward included several members of his leadership team — Senators Dick Durbin of Illinois, Brian Schatz of Hawaii and Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada — and two who have announced their plans to retire: Senators Gary Peters of Michigan and Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire. Democratic Senators John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York and Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire also voted yes, as did Senator Angus King, the Maine independent who caucuses with their party.

From the original story:

Senator Chuck Schumer’s sudden decision on Thursday to support a Republican-written bill to avert a government shutdown so enraged his fellow Democrats that some were already talking about primary challenges to the 74-year-old Democratic leader from New York.

The eruption of anger about Mr. Schumer’s seeming surrender thrust into public view a generational divide that has emerged as one of the Democratic Party’s deepest and most consequential rifts.

Younger Democrats are chafing at and increasingly complaining about what they see as the feebleness of the old guard’s efforts to push back against President Trump. They are second-guessing how the party’s leaders — like Mr. Schumer, who brandishes his flip phone as a point of pride — are communicating their message in the TikTok era, as Republicans dominate the digital town square.

And they are demanding that the party develop a bolder policy agenda that can answer the desperation of tens of millions of people who are struggling financially at a time when belief in the American dream is dimming.

In other words, the younger generation is done with deference.

Some who argue for more militancy in opposing Mr. Trump say the party’s elders tend to be less comfortable with the type of unbending political warfare that is called for.

“Our party needs more of a fighting spirit,” said Representative Chris Deluzio, a 40-year-old from outside Pittsburgh. “This is not a normal administration, and they’re willing to do dangerous things.”

You know, I am angry enough at the misigash that Trump has pulled that I can sort of see the point of ”resistance,” but I still think that the further Left the party moves, the less likely they are to win. After all Kamala Harris was more on the progressive side than centrist Democrats that might have beaten Trump, but Harris lost handily.  Seriously, do we want someone like AOC running for President (she won’t be doing that, but I am talking about someone sharing her views)? Would they stand a chance of winning? Would Bernie Sanders? I doubt it. Ask James Carville.

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn,  Hili and Andrzej are practicing entomology:

Hili: Something is walking on the ceiling.
Andrzej: I see, but I don’t know the name of this insect either.
In Polish:
Hili: Coś chodzi po suficie.
Ja: Widzę, ale też nie wiem jak się ten owad nazywa.

In honor of Play the Recorder Day, Stupsi reminds us from Berlin.

“Das ist ein schöner Stock. Er riecht gut. Hast du ihn auch so gern?” (Translation: “That is a nice stick. It smells good. Do you like it, too?”

Stupsi’s staff Natalie playing the recorder instead of the usual harpsichord (listen for the cat interpolations). All she can remember is that it’s a Bach minuet.

Lagniappe: Natalie’s best friend Susanna Borsch, who lives in the Netherlands.  As Natalie says, “We used to play a trio for almost a decade when we were young. She does a lot of playing; one of my favorites of her is her duo she has with her husband Adrian Brown, the finest recorder maker and the maker of the recorder I play in the little clip above. He also made the concertinas that he plays here.

Here are Susanna and Adrian playing “All in a Garden Green.”

*******************

From Cat Memes: a beautiful kitty with a broken heart.

From Strange, Stupid, or Silly Signs:

From The Language Nerds (I love those Irish women’s names like “Siobhan” and “Aoife”):

From Masih: somebody invite her to dinner! She really can dance and sing, and she has been through a lot.  The video is half an hour long and it is definitely worth watching. It includes Masihs favorite dish, gormeh sabzi, which brings her to tears. (I have had it, too, and it is great!)

From Luana: What the government demands from Columbia if the school is to get the $400 million withheld for anti-Semitism returned.

From Simon, two tweets. They are not eating the dogs, but the dogs are not eating!

Next lawsuit:Dogs vs DOGE

George Conway (@gtconway.bsky.social) 2025-03-14T17:05:14.400Z

Part II. I am not a big fan of d*gs, but I would never starve them.

Better than eating them?

George Conway (@gtconway.bsky.social) 2025-03-14T17:11:16.201Z

Two from my feed:

This is so sweet, even though the man is ashes.

From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I reposted.

Gassed on arrival at Auschwitz. Crime: being Jewish. Age: 5

Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-03-15T09:35:56.917Z

Two posts from Dr. Cobb. First, a sweet fishy:

We have a porcupine pufferfish friend that truly loves the Cam and we truly love him/her right back 🥰🐡 #porcupinepuffer #pufferfish #cutiepie #smile #coral #coralhead #coralcitycamera #miami #portmiami #miamibeach #biscaynebay #coralcity #civicpridethroughbiodiversity

Coral City Camera (@coralcitycamera.bsky.social) 2025-03-14T14:15:08.584Z

Stupendous: the lunar eclipse as seen from the Moon! Earth blocks out the Sun. (Blue Ghost is a private lunar lander.)

Oh this is beautiful and wondrous!A total lunar eclipse (seen from Earth) is a total solar eclipse seen from the moon.Here is the “diamond ring” of last night’s eclipse seen by Blue Ghost on the Moon! 🧪www.flickr.com/photos/firef…

David Grinspoon (@drfunkyspoon.bsky.social) 2025-03-14T14:21:25.004Z

 

 

 

Friday: Hili dialogue

March 14, 2025 • 6:47 am

We’ve reached the end of the “work” week, though many who say they’re “working from home” are , of course,, raiding the fridge or chilling with their cat.  But I digress: it’s Friday, March 14, 2025, and National Potato Chip Day.  Here’s how Lays makes them (the ruffled kind, which stands up better to dips, is my perennial favorite):

And of course it’s National Pi Day, since the date written in English is 3/14. But 15:09, or 3:09 p.m., it will be 3/14 15:9. Pi!

It’s also Learn About Butterflies Day (an important fact: many species are declining), Moth-er Day (honoring moths), National Reuben Sandwich Day, Science Education Day, National Save a Spider Day, and Purim, the Jewish holiday celebrating the saving of the Jews from massacre by the Persians. It’s celebrated with the consumption of latkes and Hamentashen, triangular pastries filled with fruit jam (said to resemble the hat of the villain Haman, who persuaded the Persian king to kill the Jews. The Jews were saved by the intercession of Queen Esther, and so we have the usual description of a Jewish holiday:

They tried to kill us;
They failed;
Let’s eat!

Here are some Hamentashen with poppy seed, raspberry, and apricot, though the traditional filling, and my favorite, is prune (good for the kishkes, too!):

Infrogmation of New Orleans, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Every year at this time the University of Chicago hosts a famous Latke-Hamantash debate (read the Wikipedia page), which has been going since 1946.  Six Jewish scholars here defend either the latke or the hamentash, pointing out the advantages of one over the other (3 defenders each) and the problems with the other side’s food item. It is supposed to be funny and defended on the basis of the scholar’s own field, so I would have to give an evolutionary reason why, say, the hamentash is superior (I was invited once but was out of town). It is always a tie!  Other schools have now started aping us, as they do with our Chicago Principles of Free Speech.

To see the debate 7 years ago on YouTube, go here (the proper debate starts at 18:16, preceded by remarks from Rabbi Anna (it’s run by Hillel) as well as some music by an a cappella chorus.

After the debate, fresh latkes and Hamentash are served. What’s a debate without a little nosh?

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the March 21 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*Although the U.S. has proposed a cease-fire between Russia and Ukraine. Russia isn’t having it.

Russian President Vladimir Putin said Russia wouldn’t agree to an immediate end to the fighting in Ukraine, as Moscow’s army made rapid gains toward expelling Ukraine’s forces from its Kursk region.

Any pause in fighting at this point would be in Ukraine’s interests, he said, adding that Russia wanted a truce that led “to a lasting peace and the elimination of the root causes” of the war, which he described as a crisis.

Putin’s comments were the first official response from Moscow to a U.S.-backed proposal agreed by Ukraine this week to pause the war, now in its fourth year. They came as President Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, was headed to Moscow to discuss the cease-fire proposal, according to two U.S. officials.

“The idea itself is good, and we of course support it, but there are questions we have to discuss,” Putin said Thursday.

Putin said it wasn’t clear how such a cease-fire would be enforced and whether it would give Ukraine the chance to shore up its forces.

Russia in the past has repeatedly ruled out a temporary cease-fire and voiced skepticism about any peace talks, insisting that a lasting agreement would take time.

Many of the “root causes” cited by Putin were set out in a draft treaty drawn up by Russian and Ukrainian negotiators in April 2022, weeks after Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine began.

Russia justified its invasion that year as a defense against NATO expansion, and that document envisions a postwar Ukraine that is a disarmed and permanently neutral state unaligned with any military blocs.

. . . . Moscow insists on keeping at a minimum the 18% of Ukrainian territory it already controls, an area equivalent to the state of Virginia in size.

In short, as the article notes, Russia has no incentive to stop the fighting. It will get 18% of Ukraine and a neutral state on its boundary. Given that nobody from the West wants to tangle with Putin, this will merely embolden other autocratic states to expand their areas.  Taiwan looks to be the next one to me. . . . And reader Merilee recommends this eloquent eight-minute video from the President of Finland, describing why people and countries should defend Ukraine.

*Trump’s Executive Orders to fire half the government is coming back to bite him, as a federal judge ordered the rehiring of many from several departments, saying that their firing had been a “sham”:

A federal judge on Thursday ordered six federal agencies to rehire thousands of workers with probationary status who had been fired as part of President Trump’s government-gutting initiative.

Ruling from the bench, Judge William J. Alsup of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California went further than he had previously, finding that the Trump administration’s firing of probationary workers had essentially been done unlawfully and by fiat through the Office of Personnel Management, the government’s human resources arm.

He directed the Treasury and the Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, Defense, Energy and Interior Departments to comply with his order and offer to reinstate any employees who were improperly terminated. His order stemmed from a lawsuit brought by employee unions who challenged the legality of the mass firings.

Judge Alsup concluded that the government’s actions were a “gimmick” designed to expeditiously carry out mass firings.

He said it was clear that federal agencies had followed directives from the Office of Personnel Management to use a loophole allowing them to fire probationary workers en masse based on poor performance, regardless of their actual conduct on the job.

“It is a sad day when our government would fire some good employee and say it was based on performance when they know good and well that’s a lie,” he said.

“It was a sham in order to try to avoid statutory requirements,” he added.

Well, I don’t know the proper procedure for firing, but it looks as though Trump’s EOs are going to land him in numerous court battles in the next couple of years. And I’m beginning to hope that Vance won’t be a shoo-in in 2028; but the Democrats still have to confect a strategy.

*The Free Press has an article about Mahmoud Khalil, the ex-Columbia student detained for supposedly engaging with pro-terrorist organizations during protests at his school.  The Free Press introduces a piece about it by noting the debate between free-speechers those who say the law allows for the deportation of Khalil, and saying that  “Yale constitutional law professor Jed Rubenfeld says they’re both wrong. The law, he argues, isn’t obvious on either side. And anyone who says it is is not telling the truth.” The article is Both Left and Right Are Wrong About Mahmoud Khalil.”

Political opinion, no matter how abhorrent, is protected speech in America. Expressing support for even the sickest terrorist butchers, like Hamas, is protected speech. In fact, even if Khalil had committed nonspeech, non-protected acts like blocking Jewish students from accessing parts of the Columbia campus, but the true reason for his arrest was because he’s pro-Hamas, he would still have a First Amendment retaliation claim—if he were a citizen.

But he’s not a citizen. His green card makes him a lawful permanent resident, but he’s still an alien. Thus the real question is whether, or when, or to what extent aliens have the same constitutional rights as citizens. Unfortunately for both left and right, the answer is complicated.

. . . . . And in many subsequent cases, the Court has not only endorsed Holmes’ great Abrams dissent, but expressly held, as in a 1945 case called Bridges v. Wixon, that “[f]reedom of speech and of the press is accorded aliens residing in this country.”

How can this make sense? How can Turner still be good law if aliens are protected by freedom of speech?

The answer is that Turner was not addressing lawfully admitted aliens. The case concerned aliens outside the United States and aliens who try to come here illegally. Foreigners outside America have never been held to enjoy constitutional rights, and as the Turner Court held, an alien “does not become one of the people to whom these [rights] are secured by our Constitution by an attempt to enter, forbidden by law.” By contrast, Abrams dealt with aliens who had entered the country lawfully and resided here for five to 10 years.

So do we have a clear answer now? Khalil appears to have entered the country legally, so that means he has full constitutional rights?

Not so fast. The Court has never held that an alien obtains the full panoply of constitutional rights the moment he is lawfully admitted here. Instead, the Court has created a kind of sliding scale in which legal aliens acquire constitutional rights as they “develop” more “substantial connections with this country.”

. . . .it’s pretty clear that Khalil has “substantial connections” to America.

So does that finally end the matter? Khalil enjoys constitutional rights as a lawful permanent resident, and the First Amendment does not allow people to be punished for expressing their political opinions, no matter how abhorrent. Case closed?

No, still not closed. Because Khalil’s case arises in a distinctive context: deportation.

If Khalil were being prosecuted in a criminal case, as Abrams was back in 1919—for example, under a statute prohibiting seditious dissent—his First Amendment rights would be violated and would protect him. But Khalil is not being prosecuted; he is in deportation proceedings. And those who support Khalil’s deportation will say this makes all the difference, because as the Supreme Court held in 1953, “Courts have long recognized the power to expel or exclude aliens as a fundamental sovereign attribute exercised by the Government’s political departments largely immune from judicial control.”

It goes back and forth until author Rubenfeld concludes:

Given these crosscutting precedents, it is sadly probable that judges’ reactions to cases like Khalil’s will tend to divide along partisan lines. A good bet is that the Southern District of New York judge currently hearing Khalil’s case will (if the case isn’t transferred to Louisiana) likely enjoin the administration from deporting him. Another fair bet is that the more conservative judges of the Fifth Circuit (if the case is transferred) will likely uphold the deportation.

But anyone who says the law is settled or obvious here is wrong, as is anyone who thinks they know how the Supreme Court will rule.

I don’t know! I don’t!  But I’m pretty sure this case, which looks to be repeated as Trump tries to deport people, will go to the Supreme Court. And, if the divide there is along partisan lines, Khalil will be out of here.

*The WaPo has a fascinating and long story (archived here) about the problem of curing rare diseases, disease for which companies have little financial incentives to develop useful drugs. The case discussed is that of Alaina Smith, a girl from Texarkana who came down at five with what seems to be about the most horrible disease you can have: free-living amoebas that can infect humans and eat their brains!

. . . . For the next week, Walter and Amanda [Smith] remained with Alaina in the hospital. No news was good news, and Alaina, by some miracle, seemed not only undamaged by brain surgery but nearly back to her old self. Then, as they packed up to return home for Christmas, several doctors appeared outside her door and beckoned the parents. “They just pointed at the word on their phone and said, ‘This is what she’s got,’” recalled Walter. “They couldn’t even pronounce it. They just said, ‘It’s not good. Don’t even google it.’”

Walter and Amanda took in the word: “Balamuthia.” They’d grown used to being treated, as Walter put it, “as just hicks from the country.” Amanda thought it was more the indifference of a system overwhelmed by demands. “We’re just ants on the anthill,” she said. For the most part they didn’t protest, or expect special treatment, or do anything but allow the doctors to think whatever they thought of them. Their first instinct was to respect their doctors, but they were coming to doubt their infallibility. They googled “Balamuthia” and learned that it was an amoeba that on very rare occasions entered the human brain and consumed it, possibly through the ingestion or inhalation of soil or compost. Walter immediately thought of the raised beds and the swirl of dust.

Even at that point there was still hope in the air — the possibility that the surgery might have completely removed the brain-eating amoebas. That sentiment was tested by yet another MRI, after which a nurse pulled Walter and Amanda into a room. Waiting for them were doctors in white coats. Six doctors sat on one side of the table. Walter and Amanda sat on the other. Someone had arranged for each parent to have a box of tissues — Walter instantly noticed this detail. The doctors showed them the second MRI. “It looked like a bomb had gone off in the back of her head,” said Walter. They listened to the doctors explain what they themselves obviously had only just learned about Balamuthia. How fewer than 200 cases had been reported worldwide and that it had killed 95 percent of the people it had infected. How there was still no known effective treatment for it, just a cocktail of drugs whose only certain effect was to sicken the patient. “They told us again not to look it up,” said Walter, “’cause they’d looked it up. And they’re like, ‘Holy shit, this kid is going to die.’”

Nothing worked until Mom did some Googling:

And there was zero chance that some pharmaceutical company was going to ride to the rescue with some new cure. “The only hope,” said DeRisi, “is drugs that have already been in people. And okay, if that’s true, let’s try every drug ever approved in Europe or by the FDA.” He set his graduate students loose on the problem. They grew Balamuthia in the lab and bombarded it with the 2,177 drugs approved in either the United States or Europe. All but one were ineffective. And the one, very oddly, stopped Balamuthia in its tracks. It was called nitroxoline. An antibiotic long used for urinary tract infections outside the United States, it was neither used nor approved for use in the United States. Its ability to kill Balamuthia inside a lab was no guarantee that it would do the same inside a human. But for the first time in the brief recorded history of this free-living amoeba, there was hope.

. . . . . Late one night that August, Amanda’s mother, Kathryn Keithley, just started googling “Balamuthia.” Amanda thought Walter had googled the story of each and every one of the small handful of Balamuthia survivors, but apparently not. For her mother now discovered the preprint of a new paper co-authored by, among other people, Joe DeRisi. It described a case study of the use of nitroxoline on a middle-aged white man who lived off the grid and had wandered into the University of California at San Francisco six months before Alaina had been diagnosed. The man had survived. Kathryn handed the paper to Amanda. Amanda read it and called their doctor at Children’s Medical Center Dallas, who said, “Where did you find this? Our people haven’t even found this.”

The upshot: the family got some leftover nitroxoline pills from a guy who had the amoeba and had been cured (it was too slow to get them right away from China, where they’re made), Alaina began taking them, and lo! she was cured. The lesson? Well, it’s hard to find cures for rare diseases, not only because companies lack the will and money to invest in those cures, but also because there are not enough cases to even do a controlled study of a drug. All you can do is test various drugs against the putative agent, and see if anything stops it, which is how it worked this time. As for the very many diseases that remain rare, there isn’t any good answer.

*The AP’s reliable “oddities” section describes the TSA catching a man at the airport smuggling a turtle (and not a small one) in his pants. And it was a red-eared slider, a common pet turtle and one of the denizens of Botany Pond.

A Pennsylvania man who was going through security at a New Jersey airport was found to have a live turtle concealed in his pants, according to the federal Transportation Security Administration.

The turtle was detected Friday after a body scanner alarm went off at Newark Liberty International Airport. A TSA officer then conducted a pat-down on the East Stroudsburg man and determined there was something concealed in the groin area of his pants.

When questioned further, the man reached into his pants and pulled out the turtle, which was about 5 inches (12 centimeters) long and wrapped in a small blue towel. He said it was a red-ear slider turtle, a species that is popular as a pet.

The man — whose name was not released — was escorted from the checkpoint area by Port Authority police and ended up missing his flight. The turtle was confiscated, and it’s not clear if the turtle was the man’s pet or why he had it in his pants.

“We have seen travelers try to conceal knives and other weapons on their person, in their shoes and in their luggage, however I believe this is the first time we have come across someone who was concealing a live animal down the front of his pants,” said Thomas Carter, TSA’s Federal Security Director for New Jersey. “As best as we could tell, the turtle was not harmed by the man’s actions.”

He said the incident remains under investigation, and it wasn’t clear if the man would face any charges or penalties.

We’ll take that turtle for Botany Pond, please. It will be happy here!

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn,  Hili encounters baby Julia, offspring of the upstairs neighbors. As Malgorzata explains, “Andrzej wanted a picture of Hili with the baby but Hili didn’t want to come close. So he took some cat food and put it on the floor by the baby. Hili came to get the food and he could take the picture.”

Hili: Dry cat food on the floor by the baby must be a trick.
Andrzej: You guessed it.
In Polish:
Hili: Sucha karma na podłodze koło dziecka to jakiś podstęp.
Ja: Zgadłaś.

*******************

 

From Cats Without Gods:

From America’s Cultural Decline into Idiocy:

From Stacy via Colin, another one of those papers:

Masih has a thread on Twitter responding to Ilhan Omar, who dissed the brave Iranian. Here’s the first and last two tweets of ten. Omar never seems to sympathize with Masih’s campaign against Islamist misogyny, but apppears to side with Iran against Masih’s activism:

The last two tweets:

From Luana, a very funny tweet.

From Malgorzata. Am Yisrael chai!

From my feed, a great coincidence:

From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I reposted:

This Polish lawyer lived just eleven days after arriving in Auschwitz.

Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-03-14T10:06:44.371Z

And one post from Dr. Cobb. First, a phylogeography of knots, which date back at least ten thousand years:

 

Thursday: Hili dialogue

March 13, 2025 • 6:45 am

Welcome to Thursday, March 13, 2025, and National Jewel Day.  Here’s my favorite gem (after the fire opal): the star sapphire. I was once offered a gorgeous star ruby in the back alleys of Jaipur, India, by a dubious man. He wanted $300. But I wasn’t dumb enough to buy it.

Mitchell Gore, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

It’s also Donald Duck Day, National Chicken Noodle Soup Day, Popcorn Lovers Day, National Coconut Torte Day, and National Riesling Day (an undervalued wine, but one that’s rising in price).

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the March 13 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*SpaceX has delayed the flight that was to bring home two American astronauts,  Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams. stuck at the ISS for nine months after what was supposed to be a ten-day mission.  The flight is scheduled to bring four fresj astronauts to the ISS and swap them for four used astronauts, including Wilmore and Williams. See Jim Batterson’s post about this yesterday.

A crew of international astronauts slated to launch to the International Space Station on a mission that will take the reins from NASA’s Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, allowing them to return home after an unexpectedly extended and politically charged journey, will have to wait a bit longer.

“This is a ground issue. Everything was fine with the rocket and the spacecraft,” NASA spokesperson Darrol Nail said on the livestream.

SpaceX said earlier Wednesday that it could launch the Crew-10 mission again as soon as Thursday at 7:26 p.m. ET, though a decision to use that opportunity has not yet been made.

*On Tuesday the House narrowly passed (on party lines, of course) a bill that would keep the government open, for they were going to run out of money on Friday night.  But that bill still has to pass the Senate, and of course there’s a filibuster there that takes 60 votes. What Senate Dems will do is not certain!

President Donald Trump needs Senate Democrats’ votes to keep the government funded and open this week. But the group is still agonizing over whether to use this rare point of congressionalleverage to extract concessions from Republicans and risk taking blame for a government shutdown.

Some argue that voting for a bill to fund the government through September, which the House passed 217-213 on Tuesday, would empower Trump to dismantle more of the federal government. Others contend that a shutdown would hurt federal workers and the government even more.The group spent two hours on Tuesday debating the issue in a heated closed-door meeting without coming to a conclusion on a path forward.

“I think that we need further discussion,” Sen. Angus King (I-Maine), who caucuses with the Democrats, said as he exited the meeting. The group is meeting again Wednesday to hash out a plan.

Senate Democrats are under pressure from grassroots liberals to join House Democrats in withholding their votes. Activists want Democrats to negotiate language in funding bills that explicitly bar Elon Musk’s U.S. DOGE Service from impounding any congressionally mandated funds, in a bid to slow the Trump administration’s unilateral layoffs and cuts.

“This is really the only significant point of leverage the congressional Democrats have this year,” said Ezra Levin, co-founder of the grassroots liberal group Indivisible. “It’s crazy to me that any Democrat would be like, ‘Yeah, let’s vote for it.’ Have some respect for yourself.”

But some Democrats think they must surrender that leverage to avoid what could be a chaotic and politically risky shutdown.

This puts the Democrats between a rock and a hard place. Do we want more government workers to be (temporarily) laid off? That would be blamed on the Democrats, but long-term economic damage could be pinned on Trump. Both parties stand to lose something if the government shuts down, but the Republicans would lose more if it shuts down for a long period. I have no predictions about this, but I expect we’ll know by the time I post this on Thursday

*A group of separatists in Pakistan hijacked a train and are holding hostages, Some of the attackers are wearing suicide vests. (Article archived here.)

Separatist militants hijacked a train carrying more than 400 people in an isolated mountainous area of southwestern Pakistan on Tuesday.

A militant group that claimed responsibility for the attack said it was holding scores of security personnel who had been on the train, and it threatened to kill them if the Pakistani government did not agree to a prisoner exchange.

The fate of the rest of the passengers was not immediately clear, though security officials said that at least 104 of them, mostly women and children, had been rescued, and that 17 injured passengers had been taken to the hospital for treatment.

The militants, Baloch ethnic fighters, forced the train to stop in the Bolan district of Balochistan Province after opening fire on it, according to railway and police officials.

The train was traveling from Quetta, the capital of Balochistan, to Peshawar, the capital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province. It was scheduled to pass through several cities, including Lahore and Rawalpindi, near Islamabad. But it became stranded inside a tunnel about 100 miles from Quetta as it came under attack, and the driver was killed, according to the local authorities.

And according to The Jerusalem Post:

Attackers wearing suicide bombs were sitting next to passengers taken hostage after militants took over a train in southwest Pakistan, sources said on Wednesday, complicating rescue efforts a day after the country’s first such hijacking.

There are several secessionist groups in Pakistan, and Balochistan is one of them (it also includes parts of Iran and Afghanistan).  They won’t succeed here, but people are going to die and I can’t imagine what it would be like to sit next to a terrorist wearing a suicide vest.

UPDATE from the WSJ: It appears to be over, thank Ceiling Cat:

Insurgents who attacked a passenger train in Pakistan killed 21 hostages, the military said Wednesday, while security forces rescued over 300 others and killed all 50 of the assailants.

The military spokesman, Lt. Gen. Ahmad Sharif, told local media that three soldiers who had been guarding the track were also killed in the attack that began Tuesday in restive Balochistan province.

*Mahmoud Khalil, in custody in Lousiana, was the subject of a recent court ruling that said he couldn’t be deported. But yesterday a federal judge ruled that yes, he has to stay in Louisiana, and certainly in custody, even though no charges have been disclosed. Khalil is in a detention center, whatever that is.

A federal judge said that Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University student arrested after his participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations, would remain in Louisiana for now.

U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman set a schedule Wednesday for the lawyers to present written arguments later this week. He said that his order to keep Khalil in an immigration detention facility in Louisiana was due not to the merits of any arguments, but to provide time to address the “important issues that this case raises.”

Among those is in what court Khalil’s case should be heard. Lawyers for the government argued that the case shouldn’t be decided by a judge in New York, but rather in New Jersey, where he was first booked and processed, or in Louisiana.

Separately, Furman directed that Khalil’s lawyers be allowed phone calls with their client on Wednesday and Thursday. “Our access to our client is severely limited by the fact that he is in Louisiana,” said Ramzi Kassem, a lawyer for Khalil.

Outside the Manhattan courthouse Wednesday, more than 100 demonstrators gathered across the street, flanked by police officers. Many held pro-Khalil signs. “Hands off our students,” said one.

. . . .Columbia’s interim president Katrina Armstrong said Wednesday that she stood by all of her students and supported their right to express their views.

When U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were arresting Khalil, his lawyer said, she spoke over the phone to one of the agents on the scene who told her the State Department had revoked Khalil’s student visa. She told the agent that Khalil was a lawful permanent resident and he replied that the department also had revoked that and hung up, she said.

It sounds as if Armstrong supports Khalil’s staying in the U.S., as do I (as far as know the facts). It’s not clear if ICE can remove a green card, and I’m pretty sure that this is going to be ultimately settled by the Supreme Court. And about that I simply have no prediction.

*The more I read Bret Stephens in the NYT these days, the more I like him. He’s taking out after Trump again in a column called “Democracy dies in dumbness” (archived here).

Until [Trump], no U.S. president has been so ignorant of the lessons of history. Until him, no U.S. president has been so incompetent in putting his own ideas into practice.

That’s a conclusion that stock markets seem to have drawn as they plunged following the Trump triple whammy: first, tariff threats against our largest trading partners, spelling much higher costs; second, twice-repeated monthlong reprieves on some of those tariffs, meaning a zero-predictability business environment; finally, his tacit admission, to Maria Bartiromo of Fox News, that the United States could go into recession this year, and that it’s a price he’s willing to pay to do what he calls a “big thing.”

In short, a willful, erratic and heedless president is prepared to risk both the U.S. and global economy to make his ideological point. This won’t end well, especially in a no-guardrails administration staffed by a how-high team of enablers and toadies.

What else isn’t going to end well, at least for the administration? Let’s make a list.

The Department of Government Efficiency won’t end well. It is neither a department nor efficient — and “government efficiency” is, by Madisonian design, an oxymoron. A gutted I.R.S. work force won’t lower your taxes: It will delay your refund. Mass firings of thousands of federal employees won’t result in a more productive work force. It will mean a decade of litigation and billions of dollars in legal fees. High-profile eliminations of wasteful spending (some real, others not) won’t make a dent in federal spending. They’ll mask the untouchable drivers of our $36 trillion debt: Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and defense.

The threats to our allies won’t end well. It might seem sophomorically funny, sort of, to troll Justin Trudeau, just once, as “governor” of “the great state of Canada.” It’s grotesque, horrifying and idiotic to contrive phony pretexts to embark on a relentless trade war against our friendliest neighbor — not least because it has suddenly boosted the political fortunes of Trudeau’s successor, Mark Carney, at the expense of the Conservative leader, Pierre Poilievre.

The outreach to the European far-right won’t end well. . . .

. . . . . The Ukraine negotiations won’t end well. . . .

There’s more of this: Sunday’s arrest and threatened deportation of Mahmoud Khalil, a green-card holder and pro-Palestinian activist at Columbia, may even get pro-Israel civil libertarians to defend his rights while making a martyr of him on the far-left. But the pattern is clear. Ignoring the political corollary to Newton’s Third Law of Motion — that every action has an equal and opposite reaction — the administration will now reap precisely what it should avoid.

Trump’s critics are always quick to see the sinister sides of his actions and declarations. An even greater danger may lie in the shambolic nature of his policymaking. Democracy may die in darkness. It may die in despotism. Under Trump, it’s just as liable to die in dumbness.

I’m glad to see that he opposes the detention and threatened deportation of Khalil. Stephens is clearly the best conservative columnist at the NYT, and doesn’t waste his time defending (like Ross Douthat) a fiction like Christian doctrine.

*At the same time that Trump is rebuking and humiliating Zelensky, he’s resumed giving military aid to Ukraine—all while promoting peace talks. From the AP:

U.S. arms deliveries to Ukraine resumed Wednesday, officials said, a day after the Trump administration lifted its suspension of military aid for Kyiv in its fight against Russia’s invasion, and officials awaited the Kremlin’s response to a proposed 30-day ceasefire endorsed by Ukraine.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said it’s important not to “get ahead” of the question of responding to the ceasefire, which was proposed by Washington. He told reporters that Moscow is awaiting “detailed information” from the U.S. and suggested that Russia must get that before it can take a position. The Kremlin has previously opposed anything short of a permanent end to the conflict and has not accepted any concessions.

U.S. President Donald Trump wants to end the three-year war and pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to enter talks. The suspension of U.S. assistance happened days after Zelenskyy and Trump argued about the conflict in a tense White House meeting. The administration’s decision to resume military aid after talks Tuesday with senior Ukrainian officials in Saudi Arabia marked a sharp shift in its stance.

I really detest Putin, and it drives me up the wall to see Trump kissing his tuchas. But surely Russia won’t accept an end to the ceasefire without getting part of the Ukraine that it’s taken over. I suggest that part of the deal involve North Korea becoming part of Russia (only kidding, but it would be good for North Korea!).

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn,  Andrzej tells Hili, who’s becoming a little chonky, to get some exercise.

A: Hili, go and run a little.
Hili: There is no reason, one can exercise while lying down.
In Polish:
Ja: Hili, pobiegaj trochę.
Hili: Nie ma powodu, można się gimnastykować na leżąco.

*******************

From My Cat is an Asshole:

From The Language Nerds, a chemis-tree:

From Strange, Stupid, and Silly Signs:

Masih is testifying at the trial of her would-be assassins in New York, and of course she’s scared. But she’s also brave:

From Luana: Emma Hilton responds to a post (below)

. . .  and the post:

I thought this was a joke, but it isn’t (see here and here):

From my feed, a clumsy elephant:

From the Auschwitz Memorial; one that I reposted:

Thirteen-year old Austrian Jewish girl, gassed to death upon arriving at Auschwitz.

Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-03-13T10:15:50.802Z

Two posts from Herr Doktor Professor Cobb. First, concurrent movies:

Movies that take place at roughly the same time

Silent Movie GIFs (@silentmoviegifs.bsky.social) 2025-03-11T21:12:08.834Z

. . . and, as he says, “Be glad you’re not an octopus.” He means a female octopus:

"Male blue-lined octopuses inject females with venom during sex, paralysing their larger mates to avoid being eaten. Mating ended when the females regained control of their arms." #octopus #wildlife #nature 🧪

Barbara J. King (@bjking.bsky.social) 2025-03-12T13:17:35.396Z

Wednesday: Hili dialogue

March 12, 2025 • 6:45 am

Welcome to a Hump Day (“Letšatši la Hump” in Sepedi): it’s Wednesday, March 12, 2025, and National Milky Way Day, one of my favorite American Candy Bars. Here’s how the miniature versions are made:

It’s also National Baked Scallops Day and World Day against Cyber Censorship.

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the March 12 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*Trump imposted a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum from everywhere (it was going to be 50% for Canada, but he had a brief moment of semi-sanity and brought it back down).  The EU has retaliated:

The European Union announced up to about $28 billion in planned retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports early Wednesday, shortly after President Trump’s worldwide tariffs on steel and aluminum took effect. It was the latest escalation in the global trade turmoil triggered by Mr. Trump’s campaign to use tariffs as an economic cudgel against friends and foes alike.

Mr. Trump has appeared undeterred by the uncertainty and fear his tariffs have injected into the global economy, and he has not ruled out the possibility that his policies could cause a recession in the United States.

The E.U., which is already struggling with a lackluster economy, said its retaliatory tariffs were proportionate to about $26 billion in tariffs applied by the United States. But European officials emphasized that they were ready to strike a deal with the Trump administration, with Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, saying: “Jobs are at stake, prices up, nobody needs that.”.

No other countries immediately announced further retaliation. China did not directly address the U.S. tariffs, although its Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said the government would take “firm measures” to safeguard its interests.

The 25 percent tariffs on the import of steel and aluminum have the support of U.S. domestic producers. But they could hit a range of industries, including car manufacturing, and potentially slow down the American economy.

Anybody who favors tariffs is making a mistake, and that includes domestic metal producers. It will hurt all Americans: we pay more for foreign goods and other countries are less willing to import American goods.  I see no good justification for this, and, in fact, it seems to be one more sign of an unstable President. What embarrasses me is that, as an American, I am held to blame by other countries, and I did not vote for this loon.  Why are we going after Canada, one of our closest allies? The fentanyl/immigrant scenario painted by Trump is ludicrous.  Okay, I’ll have my coffee now.

*The NYT reports that more and more American universities are choosing to stay institutionally neutral (we were the first!).  The article is archived here.

According to a new report released on Tuesday from the Heterodox Academy, a group that has been critical of progressive orthodoxy on college campuses, 148 colleges had adopted “institutional neutrality” policies by the end of 2024, a trend that underscores the scorching political scrutiny they are under. All but eight of those policies were adopted after the Hamas attack.

“We must open the way for our individual faculty’s expertise, intelligence, scholarship and wisdom to inform our state and society in their own voice, free from institutional interference,” said Mark Bernstein, a regent at Michigan, after adopting the policy in October.

He said the university had historically refrained from issuing statements on momentous events, like the assassinations of Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy or during the two world wars.

“So institutional statements are a modern phenomenon and a misguided venture that betrays our public mission,” he said.

The universities are adopting such policies at a time when the Trump administration has moved aggressively to punish them for not doing enough to crack down on antisemitism and for embracing diversity, equity and inclusion policies.

It’s a shame that it took the threats of Trump to make universities realize that they had better either apply speech policies uniformly (which Harvard wasn’t doing) or stop making ideological, political, or moral statements entirely (save for those statements bearing on matters vital to the operation of the university. We have always had institutional neutrality (using our Kalven report) as a way to butttess free speech, for nobody need fear bucking any “official views.”   Here’s the way it works with us, which I think is optimal:

Most of the new policies apply to senior administrators, like college presidents and provosts. Others also encompass units like academic departments. And many apply to faculty members when they are speaking in an official capacity, but often make clear that faculty are free to express personal views, according to the Heterodox Academy.

I can, for instance, write a letter to the editor giving my position, but that’s just for credentials purposes and doesn’t show me speaking for anyone by myself. Finally, there are some miscreants that demand to have their say, or say that “now is a time when we MUST speak out”. Here we have one of the good ones (ours) and one of those who say, “well, now is the time for every college to speak up”:

No university is more associated with neutrality than the University of Chicago, where incoming students are furnished with the Kalven Report, the 1967 document that made the case for neutrality. The report, penned as violence upended college campuses during the Vietnam War, said the university “is the home and sponsor of critics; it is not itself the critic.”

Tom Ginsburg, director of the Forum for Free Inquiry and Expression at Chicago, says adopting neutrality signals to lawmakers that colleges are committed to welcoming diverse viewpoints.

“Because the statements tended to reflect the majority views on campuses, which are overwhelmingly left-leaning,” he said, “you can see how adopting it would be a way of saying to lawmakers: ‘This isn’t who we really are. We’re not indoctrinating people with contested positions.’”

But even the Kalven Report included a caveat that doesn’t settle precisely when universities should issue statements. Neutrality, the report says, still allows colleges to speak out when “the very mission of the university and its values of free inquiry” are threatened.

That moment is now, said Ms. McGuire of Trinity Washington University. “The erosion of knowledge and expertise that this administration has embraced is very, very scary,” she said, “and higher ed should be calling it out at every turn.”

Nope, nope, and nope.

*Early yesterday morning, Moscow was subject to a huge drone attack from Ukraine (article archived here).

Russian officials said Ukraine attacked Moscow before dawn on Tuesday with its largest long-range drone bombardment of the war, as both sides stepped up attacks ahead of talks intended to find a way to end three years of fighting.

The Russian Ministry of Defense claimed to have shot down at least 91 drones in the region around Moscow and more than 240 drones directed at other targets across the country.

The Ukrainian military said it had targeted Moscow’s oil refinery, which provides more than a third of the fuel consumed in the capital region, along with an oil production station in the Orel region. Neither claim could be independently verified.

Moscow’s mayor, Sergei Sobyanin, called the attack was the largest against the city since the start of the war. At least three people were killed and 18 others were injured in the broader Moscow region, the Russian authorities said, and four international airports temporarily suspended operations. Railway tracks near the Domodedovo airport south of Moscow were also damaged.

President Vladimir V. Putin was briefed on the attack, according to Dmitri S. Peskov, the Kremlin’s spokesman. Mr. Peskov said Russian air defenses were doing “a great job” but told reporters that the authorities “must remain on guard” because attacks would likely continue.

The predawn strikes — just hours before high-level delegations from Kyiv and the United States were scheduled to meet in Saudi Arabia to discuss a possible path toward ending the war — appeared intended to serve as a reminder that despite suffering attacks and enduring huge losses, Ukraine can still hit back at Russia.

I don’t WANT a compromise peace; I want Russia to get  its tuchas out of Ukraine and give back the Crimea as well. There’s no chance of that happening, though, and even less now that the Great Orange Peacemaker thinks that he’s forging his legacy by cozying up to dictators.

*Now we have cutting of useful research: according to the WaPo, the NIH has canceled over 40 grants studying why people hesitate to get vaccinated and how to increase the vaccination rate. Is this a surprise? Now that RFK, Jr. is in charge of Health and Human Services?

The National Institutes of Health will cancel or cut back dozens of grants for research on why some people are reluctant to be vaccinated and how to increase acceptance of vaccines, according to an internal email obtained by The Washington Post on Monday.

The email, titled “required terminations — 3/10/25,” shows that on Monday morning, the agency “received a new list … of awards that need to be terminated, today. It has been determined they do not align with NIH funding priorities related to vaccine hesitancy and/or uptake.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the new secretary of NIH’s parent agency, the Department of Health and Human Services, has disparaged vaccines for years. He gained national notoriety over the past two decades by promoting misinformation about vaccines and a conjectured link to autism, drawing widespread condemnation from the scientific community.

It is unclear if Kennedy had a role, directly or indirectly, in the move to cancel these grants. But his ascendancy to HHS leadership has caused a stir in the research community. Last week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, another part of HHS, was asked by the Trump administration to launch a study into a possible connection between vaccines and autism, despite repeated research that shows no link between the two.

Spokespeople at NIH and HHS did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Monday’s email was sent by Michelle Bulls, director of the Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration. It instructed NIH officials who dispense money to researchers around the country to send termination letters by the close of business Monday. It did not specify where the order originated.

Good time to do this, what with a measles epidemic afoot and more pandemics surely to come.  Yes, some scientific projects are less important than others, but I wouldn’t think that studying and dealing with vaccine hesitancy would be in the “unimportant” group.

*I haven’t been a fan of Prince Harry (is that still his monicker) and Meghan Markle since they came to the U.S. to have a peaceful life and then began on a life of endless self-promotion. Now Markle has a t.v. series (“With Love, Meghan”; and no, she doesn’t love us), and the indomitable Tina Brown gives it an ascerbic review at the Free Press, “Meghan Markle’s Buzzkill” (originally published on Brown’s substack, “Fresh Hell,” here).  It’s a hoot if you like sharp but funny criticism. A few examples:

With her unerring instinct for getting it wrong, Meghan has come out with a show about fake perfection just when the zeitgeist has turned raucously against it. Trump’s America is a foulmouthed and disheveled cultural place where podcasters in sweaty T-shirts, crotch-rot jeans, and headphones achieve world domination on YouTube. The real person of the moment is Pamela Anderson with her proudly wan, bare face. As early as 2015, the lifestyle OG Martha Stewart understood the tide was turning against overproduced flawlessness when, as she put it, she dug herself out of “a fucking hole” of Martha hate by trash-talking her own mistakes at a Comedy Central roast of Justin Bieber. Meghan, on the other hand, has never figured out a convincing persona. Masquerading as an influencer, she’s the ultimate follower, which inevitably means she is behind the curve.

. . . .The commercial blockbusters of the Harry & Meghan documentary and Harry’s explosive memoir, Spare, were Pyrrhic victories that alienated the House of Windsor for good and burned the Sussexes’ London Bridge to the ground.

What Harry and Meghan forgot was that the great thing about being royal is you can be as boring as fuck for as long as you live and still be treated as the most important person in the room. The only reason any of these deals were signed was for low-down dish on the royals, and Meghan, in another fit of vainglorious yearning—this time for a sit-down with TV’s ultimate deity—gave that away to Oprah for free, infuriating Netflix, whose multimillion-dollar deal got them sloppy seconds.

Four years later, the Sussexes’ life is now all about pretending: showing up at B-list charity galas that would have been tossed into a palace private secretary’s reject pile, making uninvited disaster tourism appearances, or going on mock royal tours that only serve to remind us they could have done the real ones with more sizzle than anyone else in the depleted House of Windsor.

It’s almost like H. L. Mencken is back again!

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is interpreting Andrzej’s gesture as aggressive, for she’s a cat.

Hili: Such wielding of a hand with a pen is a provocation.
A: No, it’s just a gesticulation.

In Polish:
Hili: Takie machanie ręką z ołówkiem jest prowokacją.
Ja: Nie, to tylko gestykulacja.

And a picture of loving Szaron:

*******************

From Animals in Random Places, a cat with aspirations to be a ballerina:

From Richard on FB, original source unknown:

From My Cat is an Asshole (I can’t find the artist, but you can buy this as a card here):

Twitter still isn’t letting us embed posts, so I’m putting up screenshots. If a post has a video in it, click on the post to go to the video on twitter. (Wed a.m.; It appears to be fixed now, so I’ll embed tweets tomorrow.)

Masih finds out that some Iranians have been charged by the U.S. for attempting to assassinate her. Unfortunately, they’re in Iran and would be impossible to put on trial. Meanwhile, Masih is attending the trial of people  who tried to kill her in another assassination plot. Iran is after her big time!

From Bryan, an amazing invention: sign-language glvoes that translate American Sign Language into audible speech (video tweet; click on screenshot):

From Emma Hilton, who rebuts a parody account, though the parody espouses something many people believe. Seahorses and

From Malgorzata, who has watched this several times and thinks it might help young people appreciate classical music (it’s not all classical). She’s right.

From my feed, panda-monium (click on screenshot to see video):

From the Auschwitz Memorial, one that I reposted:

32-year old woman in Auschwitz who tried to provision a resistance of the Sonderkommando (inmates who disposed of bodies). She was hanged.

Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2025-03-12T09:59:17.475Z

Two posts from Dr. Cobb. First, the amazing platypus;

A multi-tasking #platypus: chewing & scratching at the same time.When #platypuses dive, they cram their cheek pouches full of food, to chew when they surface. Platypuses don't have teeth (they wear down too easily): they've replaced them with ever-growing horny ridges.#Tasmania #fieldwork #WildOz

Jack Ashby (@jackdashby.bsky.social) 2025-03-11T09:01:22.130Z

Dead man’s fingers vs. live man’s fingers. That plant is a single multinucleated cell!

Dead man’s fingers & live man’s fingers. This seaweed is rad because it is “coenocytic;” the entire individual is one, single, multinucleate cell. #Codium #Seaweed #MarineLife 🦑🌊

Matt Bracken (@brackenlab.bsky.social) 2025-03-11T04:57:11.569Z