Readers’ wildlife photos

May 14, 2014 • 4:24 am

One photo today, and of course it’s from Stephen Barnard, who’s monitoring a pair of eagles (with at least two chicks) near his place in Idaho. I think that this is one of the best bird photos he’s sent (click to enlarge).  Look at this primaries!

His caption:

One brought a fish to the nest and the other landed a few seconds later.

Eagles

Jesus ‘n’ Mo ‘n’ rage

May 14, 2014 • 4:14 am

The New Jesus and Mo strip ponders  the demise of Islamic  literalism, but the future doesn’t look bright:

2014-05-14

But I have to wonder whether we have any right to criticize Islam in this way, given that Catholics in the U.S. also beef when they’re publicly criticized? After all, as we learned yesterday, it’s only a matter of degree.

h/t: Linda Grilli

Wednesday: Hili dialogue

May 14, 2014 • 3:01 am

Hili and the new d*g Cyrus are not getting along. . . .

A: What are you thinking about?
Hili: How do you teach good manners to a big dog?
A: With extreme caution.

10325647_10203358390147800_5574849293100723720_n

In Polish:

Ja: Nad czym się tak zastanawiasz?
Hili: Jak się uczy dużego psa dobrych manier?
Ja: Ogromnie ostrożnie.

 

Gato a mano, with added WEIT

May 13, 2014 • 12:32 pm

I gotta teach, so this will have to hold you over, and anyway I’m dispirited at the number of apologists for bad Islamic behavior infesting my home.

Apparently this video was made by reader Kevin: it’s a cat video with a special book surprise at 1:41. It’s heartening to see that my authorial efforts can help cats defend themselves.

Crows find a novel use for coat hangers

May 13, 2014 • 9:41 am

We should all know by now that corvids (ravens, crows, etc.) are amazingly smart animals. But this is a new one on me. Amusing Planet gives a brief report and some nice photos of how crows in Tokyo make their nests using anthropogenic material. Indented prose is from the article:

Food isn’t the only motivation factor that drive crows to adaptability. Crows also demonstrate intelligence when building nests, using whatever materials that are available to construct them. A typical nest is composed of interlocking twigs, often recycled from the old nest, and pieces of wires of various lengths and thickness, gathered from the surrounding, to strengthen the nest structure. Tokyo residents have observed that crows in the city have learned to use coat hangers instead.

Photo from Goetz Kluge:

crow-nest-hanger-1[2]

In such a large city, there are few trees, so the natural materials that crows need to make their nests are scarce. As a result, the crows will often steal hangers from the people who live in apartments nearby, and carefully assemble them into intricate nests. The completed nests almost look like works of art.

Photo by Badaunt:

crow-nest-hanger-8[2]

Nests built from hangers were also discovered in other Japanese cities. In Fukuoka City, the Jungle Crow would often make nests atop power lines during the breeding season that could cause large blackouts due to short circuiting. The Kyushu Electric power company actually has “crow patrols” that search out and destroy hanger nests on their power grid.

Photo by Brian G. Kennedy:

crow-nest-hanger-2[6]

I seem to recall that my friend Amy, our erstwhile Japanese Correspondent who has vanished, told me that in Yokohama that crows would rip open garbage bags to steal the hangers.

 h/t: Todd

Two talks to attend: Portland and Minneapolis

May 13, 2014 • 8:35 am

As a courtesy to readers in the Midwest or Pacific Northwest, I’ll announce two upcoming talks, one on free will and the other on the failures of faith.

The first is near Minneapolis, and is this coming Sunday:

Presented by August Berkshire
Sunday, May 18, 2014, Roseville Library (near Minneapolis)
Program starts at 2 pm and is free and open to the public

“The Illusion of Free Will and its Impact on Moral Responsibility”

The question of whether or not we have free will has been debated for thousands of years. What affects do determinism, indeterminism, and randomness have on free will? What are the obstacles to perceiving free will as an illusion?

If free will is an illusion, what does this say about praise, blame, responsibility, ethics, justice, revenge, punishment, rehabilitation, cooperation, and altruism? Is life worth living? Should we be optimistic or pessimistic about the future?

Our speaker, August Berkshire, will discuss the ramifications of a natural universe without gods or free will, in which evolution shapes our thoughts and actions. He will conclude that it’s a good thing that we don’t have free will!

August Berkshire is a past president of Minnesota Atheists and a past vice president of Atheist Alliance International. He has been an atheist activist since 1984 and is the author of numerous pamphlets. He is the owner of the ATHEIST car license plate for Minnesota and is proud to be listed in the reference book “Who’s Who in Hell.” His following the trail of reason and evidence has led him to the conclusion that neither gods nor free will exist, and that we can live happy, fulfilled lives without either one.

The second is a week from tomorrow in Portland. Note the use of Professor Ceiling Cat’s trademark in its description:

Screen shot 2014-05-12 at 9.24.35 PM

 

 

 

 

 

Ditching the hijab in Iran

May 13, 2014 • 6:04 am

Let’s first review the various types of clothing worn by Muslim women, often under state edict. What we’re talking about today is the hijab, the covering of the head and chest (upper left in picture below) that is a mandatory garment in Iran

Hijab-Veil-types

Now defenders of these kinds of garments often say that they’re worn voluntarily by Muslim women—and sometimes they are. But it’s hard to disentangle “truly voluntary” from “I’m used to wearing them because I was forced to since childhood” or “voluntary because I’ll be arrested/vilified if I don’t wear them.” When I was in Turkey, in a university that banned headscarves, many Muslim women told me they favored the ban, for it it were legal, some Muslim students would wear them and shame the others for “not being good Muslims.” They didn’t want that kind of pressure to dress in a certain way.  A woman from the BBC link cited below says likewise:

“My problem is not having to wear the headscarf. My problem is not having a choice,” writes one woman on the Facebook page. “Stealthy freedom means, just for a few seconds, I will be what I want to be,” writes another.

But the true sign that these garments are worn under coercion is what happens when the national and social bans are lifted. Do women then doff them?

In Iran, they’re doffing hijabs illegally, a real sign of how women are chafing at having to be covered, presumably because the sight of their naked heads and necks might incite uncontrollable lust in Muslim men. As reported by both the BBC and the Guardian, there’s now a Facebook page where Iranian women can post pictures of themselves unveiled. What these women are doing is illegal, but heartening. As the Guardian reports:

Thousands of Iranian women are taking off their veils and publishing pictures of themselves online, igniting a debate about the freedom to wear or not wear the hijab.

A Facebook page set up by London-based Iranian journalist Masih Alinejad 10 days ago has attracted more than 130,000 likes, with women across Iran sending unveiled pictures taken in parks, at the seaside and in the streets.

Go have a look at the page called “Stealthy Freedoms of Iranian Women”. Most of the captions written by the women are in the local language, Farsi, but a few are translated into English by the Guardian. Here are some (indented captions from the Guardian).

“My stealthy freedom while driving in the streets of Tehran,” wrote Maryam alongside an image showing her behind the wheel. “I like to feel the wind blowing on my face.”

10250109_862580193756076_9072109188463029728_n

Another post showed a mother with her daughter. “The beautiful seaside in Kish [Island],” the younger woman wrote. “We strolled on the rocks and experienced the cool breeze flowing through our hair. Is this a big request?”

10151753_862329717114457_7683719641905281395_n

 A young woman from the city of Fuman, in the northern province of Gilan, sent a picture of her in the woods. “I took this picture stealthily in the spring,” she wrote. “It makes me feel happy.”

This is what freedom looks like:

10264740_861715827175846_6515432343594381634_n

A few others I’ve selected, with captions in both Arabic and English:

Screen shot 2014-05-13 at 7.44.57 AM 10311966_865950983418997_2036431101986312672_n

Screen shot 2014-05-13 at 7.47.18 AM 10341857_865727640107998_7859862912141093535_n

Screen shot 2014-05-13 at 7.49.07 AM 10313047_865167416830687_8882521974027524082_n

Screen shot 2014-05-13 at 7.50.47 AM 10277896_865135280167234_8795949942156132519_n

Screen shot 2014-05-13 at 7.53.01 AM 10300778_865034020177360_1559560623394183523_n

There are hundreds of these photos on the Facebook page—they’re pouring in from Iran as if from an uncorked bottle. Go look at them! And the bravery of these women, and their plaintive and simple desire to dress as they please, makes me tear up.  But it also makes me feel great to see them defying the misogyny and repression of Islam.

h/t: Steve

 

 

Surprise: Ukraine referendum a total farce

May 13, 2014 • 5:12 am

Sunday’s “referendum” about the fate of eastern Ukraine was, as many predicted, a complete sham.  That, of course, was the plan of the thug Putin, who intends to bring that part of the country under Russian control, if not a part of Russia itself.  The vote for “sov ereignty” was 90% in favor, not quite as indicative of thuggery as, say, an election in China or North Korea, but pretty close.

As the New York Times reports (and let’s not have rants about how the paper is a propaganda organ of the U.S. government), this is what a “fair” referendum looks like:

Nearly everyone who cast a ballot appeared to be voting in favor of greater autonomy from the Ukrainian central government in Kiev. Opponents appeared to be staying away from the polls, as many had said they would. The ballot papers that could be seen in transparent ballot boxes in two cities, Donetsk and Slovyansk, were almost all marked yes.

Transparent ballot boxes. Great!

In one town, Ukrainian security forces shot a man to death outside a polling station as an angry crowd, ignoring warning shots, rushed toward a building that the soldiers controlled. In some other cities, voters took ballots that were run off on photocopiers and stuffed them into cardboard boxes that the organizers spirited off quickly, lest they be seized by pro-government forces.

. . . At a half-dozen polling places visited by reporters, except for those in Slovyansk, there were no voting rolls to consult; anyone who could show a local address in official identity papers was allowed to cast a ballot. Tatyana Us, a volunteer election official, referred to the practice as “open list” voting.

. . . In the town of Krasnoarmiysk, voters filed past a table on Sunday to pick up a ballot and a sausage sandwich. Crude secessionist propaganda posters hung near the polling station, touching dark themes of xenophobia and anti-Semitism. One depicted the current president, Oleksandr V. Turchynov, as a goat-like figure and asked, “Do you want Satan as your president?” Another said Ukrainians should reject the “European Jewish choice.”

And the sign of inequity:

Late Sunday, separatist leaders in Donetsk reported that the ballot on “self-rule” had gone in their favor, with almost 90 percent of the vote, and that 75 percent of the region’s eligible voters had gone to the polls. For the province as a whole, another organizer was quoted as saying, “on average, from every 1,000 ballots, only one is against.”

Another sign that this kind of drummed-up vote doesn’t reflect the will of the people comes from a Pew Poll published on May 8, indicating that while both east and west Ukraine lack confidence in the central government, big majorities in both regions want the country to remain unified—and that goes for Russian speakers. (Easterners, however, want both Ukrainian and Russian to be the country’s official languages:

A clear majority of Ukrainians agree that their country should remain a single, unified state, according to a pair of new surveys conducted by the Pew Research Center in Ukraine and Russia – after Crimea’s annexation by Russia, but prior to recent violence in Odessa and other cities. The survey in Ukraine also finds a clearly negative reaction to the role Russia is playing in the country. By contrast, the poll in Russia reveals a public that firmly backs Vladimir Putin and Crimea’s secession from Ukraine.

Here are the data:

PG-2014-05-08-ukraine-russia-0-01

And this is what is giving Putin confidence:

In Russia proper, the public also sees the matter as closed. More than eight-in-ten Russians (84%) think the March 16threferendum was fair and even more (89%) say Kyiv ought to validate the results, according to a new Pew Research survey in Russia, conducted among 1,000 randomly selected adults between April 4-20. The same survey finds that majorities of Russians (61%) agree that there are parts of neighboring countries that belong to Russia, and that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a great tragedy (55%). While the poll did not explicitly ask Russians whether they supported the Kremlin taking military action to protect ethnic Russians in Ukraine, nearly two-thirds (65%) agree that military action is sometimes necessary to maintain order in the world.

The data:

PG-2014-05-08-ukraine-russia-0-06

61% of Russians think that nearby countries should be part of their own, while only 28% disagree.

It is a curiosity of our time that we see Putin and his thugs repeating the kind of land grab—and the kind of call for annexation of “historically Russian” land—that resembles the actions of Hitler before WWII. If any Western country tried this kind of shenanigans, they’d be roundly excoriated for imperialism.

Some day we’ll find out that Putin is an oligarch in every sense: not just a monomaniacal tyrant who wrestles bears, but one who has enriched himself at the expense of his people.

I have no doubt that some readers will defend this phony referendum—and Putin himself—and I’ll continue to receive the kind of obscene and harassing phone calls that always follow my posts on this issue.  I’m truly puzzled why so many people want to defend this expansionism and Russian-sponsored violence.

Russians: this is your leader. Putin topless on horseback (. REUTERS/RIA Novosti/Pool/Alexei Druzhinin)
Russians: this is your leader. Putin topless on horseback (EUTERS/RIA Novosti/Pool/Alexei Druzhinin)