John Oliver goes after Bari Weiss and CBS News

December 21, 2025 • 9:28 am

A reader sent me a video-containing email with the header “John Oliver destroys Bari Weiss”, with the message below saying, “Somebody had to do it.”  Well, yes, somebody should criticize the Free Press, which is becoming, in my view, more political (right-centrist) and less full of news. And even news stories aren’t really written by seasoned reporters, and it shows.  Plus the site has a lot of clickbait.

Further, CBS New’s decision to make Bari Weiss a big macher in the news division shows questionable judgment at best. Weiss, who’s enormously ambitious, has simply spread herself too thin, and it shows.

Those are some of the things criticized by “comedian” John Oliver in his 34-minute rant below. Oliver is rightfully distressed that Bari Weiss has suddenly become editor-in-chief of CBS News, something that concerns me.  CBS has a distinguished history of reporting, including Edward R. Murrow, who took down Joe McCarthy on that network, as well as America’s Most Trusted Anchor, Walter Cronkite. Granted, Weiss is not an anchorperson, and editors usually stay off the air, but she’s already hosted a town hall interview with Erika Kirk, something I found cringeworthy. And Weiss promises that there will be many more town halls to come. Oy!

But Oliver, whom I almost never watch, goes after Weiss and CBS in the too-long and unfunny rant below.  I’m always mystified that people find Oliver worthy of watching. He’s like the latter-day Jon Stewart, all sweaty, ranty, and, most sinfully, not funny at all.  He doesn’t make you think, as Maher does: he goes after the low-hanging fruit that his followers want to eat.  To me, his humor and political perspicacity are far less engaging than Bill Maher’s.  And Oliver is hyperbolic, and when he characterizes Weiss’s written resignation from the NYT as “self-mythologizing.”  He also faults her for having control over the direction of CBS news but “not being a reporter.” Well, she was a columnist and surely engages with the news, so I don’t find being a “reporter” disqualifying from being an editor.  But others may disagree.

That said, I am losing interest in the Free Press as well, and yet I keep subscribing—almost entirely because I love Nellie Bowles’s Friday TGIF columns.

I’ll quote with permission from an email sent me by reader Jim Batterson when I sent him the link to the rant below. He stopped subscribing to the Free Press a while ago. Bat:

I think Bari lost her focus. She had a good focus on Israel and antisemitism as well as the excesses of Woke back when she left the New York Times. She started off Common Sense and early versions of The Free Press with proper in-depth critique if I recall correctly, but at some point spread herself all over the map…more chaos than heterodoxy.  I unsubscribed from TFP somewhere around when she was giving oxygen to the “it escaped from a lab” speculation, piling on Fauci, and starting her love affair with religion (I had thought her Judaism was much like my ow—cultural— and that she was of the Jewish people, not a deeply observant Jew).

Listening to Oliver is a painful experience to me.  Freddie deBoer points out the problem with Oliver’s sneering, progressive condescension.  deBoer’s column is largely about gender, but I’m highlighting the problems with Oliver’s progressivism combined with his hyperbolic humorlessness:

I get it: nominating John Oliver as a symbol of liberalism’s failures was well-worn territory a decade ago. This argument has already been made, all the ideological fruit plucked. And the broader debate about liberal condescension as a profound political advantage for the right has percolated in its current form since the 2016 election and in a more general sense for longer than any of us have been alive. I hate to fight yesterday’s war, and I hate to bore you with arguments that have already been made. But at some point, when you see liberals share the same videos week after week of an annoying British man sneering down a camera lens to tell you how stupid everyone else is, you do have to ask if the American left-of-center has any sense at all of how much their project has been damaged by their reputation for patronizing self-righteousness. If the Trump era has proven anything, it’s just how wildly sensitive voters are to the perception that someone somewhere is judging them. That level of sensitivity to vague slights is stupid and the grievance usually disingenuous, but that’s politics, baby. And Oliver is such a pitch-perfect caricature of progressive self-regard – snarky, aloof, judgmental, incurious – that I sometimes wonder if his show is a brilliant op pulled off by the Heritage Foundation.

One of the great weaknesses of contemporary liberalism is the absolute inability to take an L on any issue; scroll around on BlueSky and you’ll find, for example, vast throngs of progressives who are completely unwilling to admit that mass immigration of unskilled labor into the United States is deeply unpopular. I think the left’s control of our arts, culture, and ideas industries have left too many of us thinking that we can’t lose a culture war. But in the broad sense, we currently are.

A pox on both their houses. Without further ado:  Oliver tires to take down Weiss.

Trump’s speech last night and Jimmy Kimmel’s response

December 18, 2025 • 9:45 am

Last night Trump did one of his prime-time self-justifications speeches. I skipped it but listened to the 18-minute bit of bombast and braggadocio just now. It’s the usual palaver, extolling his administration as having effected more positive change than any other administration in American history. (He settled eight wars in ten months!!)  There’s a lot of Biden-bashing. I suppose this is a response to his slipping approval ratings.

If you didn’t hear it, you can listen to the one below.

Here’s Jimmy Kimmel’s 16-minute response from the same night, as well as his intro to his show. The video below has garnered over 1.5 million views since it was put up last night.  Here’s the YouTube intro, but it’s no substitute for the clip, which you should watch (h/t Bat).

We had a surprise national address from Donald Trump tonight, former special counsel Jack Smith testified that his team gathered “powerful evidence” to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump broke the law, Trump has been spending his time putting up plaques on the White House insulting and trolling other Presidents, there was a Senate hearing this morning about the little incident with the FCC that got us an unwanted vacation a couple of months back, Ted Cruz took the opportunity to call Jimmy “profoundly unfunny,” the new footage from the soon-to-be released documentary about Melania came out today, the Oscars are now moving to YouTube starting in 2029, and we sent Mark Hamill out to Hollywood Blvd to stand on his star and see who noticed and who did not!

It’s pretty heavy-handed, and not as funny as Bill Maher would have been, but it’s decent satire, with a lot of truth in it. Trump definitely has a loony side: bave a look at the plaques he put under the photos of previous Presidents. So much narcissism!

Kimmel also discusses yesterday’s Senate hearing about the FCC’s temporary ban on Kimmel’s show, with Kimmel lambasting Senator Ted Cruz.  Don’t miss the made-up exchange at 8:55, and then a funny bit at the end with Mark Hamill.

Bill Maher prognosticates the headlines

November 30, 2025 • 11:00 am

It looks as if “Real Time” will be off the air for a two months: yahoo! news says, “. . . . Maher will be taking a break from Real Time until late January.” I’ll miss the humor and also the posts.  We don’t even have a “new rules” post today, but below are two minutes of Maher guessing what the headlines will be when he’s absent.

This one is pretty funny, albeit brief.

Bill Maher’s New Rule: let’s try to get along without effacing our differences

November 23, 2025 • 10:10 am

Here’s Bill Maher’s latest comedy-and-politics bit from “Real Time,” called “New Rule: The Banishing Act.” It is part of a series he’s made asking for comity between people on opposite ends of the American political spectrum. This time, he argues, banishing people from your life if they voted for Trump, or are even anti-Trump Republicans, is not going to help anybody, much less the Democratic Party.

In fact I know several such people who won’t talk to Republicans, and that would make for some unpleasant holiday dinners. (My dad, for example, voted for Nixon—an earlier and less malign version of Trump—but I accepted it and moved on.)

At any rate, Maher notes, correctly, that liberals engage more in this form of ghosting than do conservatives, and Maher shows some of the articles written by liberal discussing it. (Litt’s article in the NYT is here, and, fortunately, his answer is “no”. In contrast, Sarah Jones’s piece says it’s okay to go “no contact with your MAGA relatives”; it’s archived here.)  Maher’s point is that this form of ghosting, accompanied with arrogant pronouncements, can only hurt Democrats. As he says, “Ultimatums don’t make people rethink your politics; they make them rethink you.” (Note that Maher mentions some prominent “wokeisms”, but also blames Republicans for their own missteps.

Note that at 5:50 Maher refers to the social media pile-on he experienced when he related that he had with Trump dinner at the White House—and Trump was actually nice and civil. For that Maher was excoriated by many people with Trump Derangement Syndrome. How dare he say anything good about Trump? That excoriating was  especially stupid because, during the dinner, Maher criticized Trump and his policies to his face. Maher still seems to be defensive about that pushback, but in fact he was right.

Do I have to add that I don’t think Trump is a good person, but admit that in a social situation he could be friendly and civil? Larry David’s NYT piece making the same point, is archived here and is mentioned by Maher.

In the end, I agree with Maher: “Can we please try to remember—especially at this time of year—that ghosting anyone who disagrees with you politically is not the way to fix what’s wrong with the country?”

The guests on the show are said to be “veteran political strategist Donna Brazile and Michael Render,” as well as Neil deGrasse Tyson and Andrew Sullivan, but the only ones I see are Brazile and Render.

Bill Maher on how socialism is tainting the Democratic party

November 18, 2025 • 9:41 am

This week’s comedy-and-news segment of Bill Maher’s “Real Time” explains why the creeping socialism of Democrats is good—but for Republicans. who wil exploit it to the max in attack ads. (We now have a socialist mayor of both NYC and Seattle.)  Maher quotes Virginia’s new Democratic governor, Abigail Spanberger, saying that “If the party doesn’t shift to the center, we will get fucking torn apart.” Maher argues that the new approbation for socialism by Democrats comes from their failure to get what they want under a capitalist system but, as he notes, the alternative is worse: “socialism doesn’t work.”

Well, of course the U.S. is already partly socialist: we have social security and Medicare, food stamps, and other government help for various groups (Maher describes some of these these). What he’s talking about is the dramatic extension of socialism proposed by people like Mamdani: free bus rides, free childcare, city-run grocery stores, and the like. To show the inimical effects of socialism, Maher uses as examples countries like North Korea, but that is “socialist” only in an extreme sense: it’s really a dictatorship in which a few get all the good stuff and most of the population goes without. But he’s right in general, as we can see what happened when Eastern Europe was under the thumb of the Soviet Union. (Malgorzata used to tell me about queuing up for hours to get a loaf of bread.) The Democratic Socialists of America, for example, call for completely open borders, defunded police, and other policies that would taint the Democrats in an election.

Some clips of the last DSA convention, showing a request for “jazz hands” instead of clapping, as well as for not wearing “aggressive” scents, tell the tale. The DSA is simply too woke for the American people, and it’s best if Democrats separate themselves from this group. Sadly, they’re pushing back on criticisms that they move towards the center, and, says Maher, that will be our undoing.  He’s right.

Bill Maher’s New Rules

November 11, 2025 • 10:50 am

Here’s the latest installment of Bill Maher’s comedy-and-politics segment of “Real Time”; this one’s called “New Rule: Democracy’s Last line of Defense.”

The last line of defense is in fact the Supreme Court, which is supposed to be a “check on executive power”.  Maher asserts that while Trump has lost a ton of cases (82 out of 87) in lower federal courts, he’s been victorious in 17 straight cases. And while the Court did in fact rule against Biden repeatedly, they’re bowing before Trump (I’m not sure about which 17 cases Maher’s referring to).  Trump apparently has, to override limitations on his powers, declared nine national emergencies, which you can see here.

The definitive decision, says Maher, will involve Trump’s levying of tariffs, which are taxes on imports; and the imposition of taxes is limited to Congress. Even if tariffs can have good results, the President still does not have the Constitutional right to levy them. Maher analogizes the Constitution to the Bible, something that can, at least for Trump, be ignored if he doesn’t like its stipulations.

The guests are Kenny Chesney, Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D), and Bill O’Reilly.

This is a serious bit, lacking the usual humor, but it should quiet down those people who still demonize Maher for having dinner with Trump at the White House and, worse, finding the President to be a genial host. (Remember that Maher went after Trump’s policies during that dinner.)

I am still hoping that the Justices will take seriously their duty to uphold the Constitution, but my confidence is wavering. . . .