The man who predicted the October 7 attack

October 5, 2026 • 8:15 am

You heard it here first, and only now, nearly three years later, the Free Press has reported on this.

When I was in Israel in September of 2023, I met Yigal Carmon, the head of MEMRI. He’s described this way by Wikipedia:

. . . . the president and co-founder of MEMRI, an organization which monitors and translates Arabic and Persian publications, radio and TV broadcasts, and religious sermons into many languages and circulates them over the Internet.

Carmon was a colonel at Aman, the Israeli military intelligence service, and later counter-terrorism advisor to Israeli prime ministers Yitzhak Rabin and Yitzhak Shamir.

Malgorzata, who translated over 5,000 articles from English into Polish for MEMRI, gave me an introduction to Carmon, and I spent a lovely day with him in and around Jerusalem. After our “security tour,” (see below) we had a fateful lunch.

On January 17, 2024, with Yigal’s permission, I posted an exchange I had with him during my September visit. Here’s from my post:

Yigal is an email friend of Malgorzata, and she put me in touch with him before I went to Israel last September. The second day I was in Jerusalem, I visited MEMRI, and Yigal took me to lunch, along with a reporter named Benjamin Weinthal (name given with permission). During that lunch, Yigal said offhandedly, “You know, I think there will be a war between Hamas and Israel in September or October.” I was stunned, but the reporter wasn’t taken aback and in fact was the first journalist to report Yigal’s prediction.  I said “How do you know this?”  Apparently the buzz that MEMRI got from the Arab world had given him a hint.  Yigal added that there might be a terrorist attack, and if, say five or fewer IDF soldiers were killed, there probably wouldn’t be a war. But if it were ten or more, he added, Israel would probably go to war.

Of course at that time Yigal had no idea that the attack would be on Israeli civilians, not IDF soldiers, and far more than ten would die.

Later, Yigal gave us a “security tour” of the Jerusalem area, pointing out spots of interest in the Arab/Israeli conflict. When I returned to America, I sent his wife (who also gave me several great tours of Jerusalem) a copy of my two trade books as a token of gratitude. They were sent to the MEMRI offices. [JAC: They were returned six months later. No packages got into Israel at that time.]

On October 6, I informed Yigal that I mailed the books, and wrote this email (I’ve bolded the interesting bits):

From: Jerry Coyne Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 1:32 PMTo: Yigal Carmon

Hi Yigal,
I am sending two of my books, as per your wife’s request, to MEMRI, so if the package below comes, please sign for it. They are autographed.
Hope all is well in Israel. Where is that war you predicted?
best,Jerry
And Yigal answered the same day. Here is what he said:
From: Yigal Carmon
To: ​Jerry Coyne​
Fri 10/6/2023 12:43 PM
Thank you , Jerry. We will read at least significant parts of them.
Give me some 3 weeks more – as I predicted. I said Sept. or October….😂😂🤣🤣

As you can see, that exchange was on October 6. The very next morning when I woke up, I learned that all hell had broken loose. Hamas had attacked Israel, killing 1200 people, almost all civilians. Yigal was right, but the toll wasn’t 10 or 100, but 1200, and more then ten IDF soldiers. A war, according to Yigal’s prognostication, was then inevitable. Yigal’s prediction had been previously published in MEMRI, but apparently the Israeli government paid no attention.

Of course that day changed everything. It was the beginning of the war and its concomitant rise in Israel and Jew hatred in the world—something that I never could have predicted—as well as the beginning of my own awareness of antisemitism and the onset of my sympathies for Israel (“the more they hate us, the Jewisher we get”).

Now the Free Press is late to the party (see the article by Weinthal), but still accurate, with this article published today). If you’re a subscriber, click to read it:

A few excerpts:

In August 31, 2023, Yigal Carmon, a counterterrorism adviser to Israeli prime ministers Yitzhak Shamir and Yitzhak Rabin more than a generation ago, published a warning on the website of his think tank, the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI). “Signs of Possible War in September–October,” said the headline of the article, written from Jerusalem in Carmon’s succinct, often brusque style.

Carmon, MEMRI’s 80-year-old founder, didn’t predict specifically that Hamas would instigate the war, or that it would begin on Israel’s border with the Gaza Strip. But he stressed that there were increased rumblings and threats of a major operation coming from the militant chiefs in the Middle East that he and MEMRI constantly monitor through Arabic- and Persian-language media channels. “The leaders of the terror organizations have recently increased their threats of a comprehensive regional war, in response to Israeli threats to assassinate terror operatives and those who dispatch them,” wrote Carmon.

Carmon’s warning proclaimed that Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), and other Iranian-backed proxy groups were acquiring and deploying increasingly sophisticated weapons and tactics that would compel a major Israeli reprisal. Those weapons “can cause a large number of Israeli fatalities,” Carmon wrote.

But that didn’t cause alarm in Jerusalem or Washington—or cause much reaction at all. President Joe Biden’s national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, said the week before Hamas’s attack that “the Middle East region is quieter today than it has been in two decades.”

And those in Israel’s national security establishment who did respond to Carmon’s prediction of doom resolutely dismissed it. “At this time, I believe that neither Hezbollah nor Hamas have an appetite for a full-blown confrontation with Israel, because they understand how devastating it would be for them,” retired Israeli general Amir Avivi told Iran International on September 5, 2023.

. . .Three years later, Carmon’s credibility has been bolstered by a string of recent reporting by the American and Israeli media claiming that he was not the only one sounding the alarm, and that Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu received advance warnings about a possible attack, including from the United Arab Emirates and Egypt. According to The Atlantic, Egypt’s intelligence chief flew to Tel Aviv less than two weeks before Hamas’s attack to report that the group seemed to be preparing for a major assault. Netanyahu’s office has denied that claim.

When I spoke to Carmon, he told me that Israel’s government didn’t need secret intelligence from Egypt or anywhere else to see that a catastrophic war could be coming. “It was all open-source. We’re not dealing with secrets,” he said about himself and MEMRI, the NGO that he started in 1998 and still leads, and that’s headquartered in Washington but has offices in Jerusalem and a number of European and Asian capitals. “We believed them. We didn’t dismiss it as bullshit,” he said of the threats issued by Israel’s enemies.

This week, Carmon is expanding on his warnings with the publication of a new report titled Chronicles of a Disaster Foretold and shared exclusively with The Free Press. In it, he lays out in much more detail the Arabic-language media and social media posts that pointed to Hamas’s preparations for an attack in 2023. The report also outlines evidence that the Palestinian militant group was channeling outside aid into weapons development.

I won’t describe the rest of the piece, which you can read for yourself (a subscription is worth it), but here are two more bits:

Particularly alarming in retrospect was a large Hamas military drill staged in Gaza in September 2023. MEMRI reported on the military drill at the time, and Carmon now believes it was essentially a “final walkthrough” for what occurred a month later.

. . . So how did Israel fail to better anticipate an attack? Carmon now believes that Netanyahu and his government were lulled into a false sense of security by their views that Hamas’s leadership was focused on this economic growth and that Qatari-supplied cash flowing into Gaza was essentially buying peace. That money was easily diverted into Hamas’s military growth, such as “building Hamas military power and its labyrinth of underground tunnels,” according to the new report by MEMRI.

I remember asking Yigal, after hearing him and the reporter, why the Israeli secret services (there are three) didn’t pay attention to MEMRI.  I don’t recall his answer, but it was something along the lines of “the security services are jealous of their own information and don’t pay attention to stuff coming from other sources.” Pity, that. Imagine if Israel had beefed up security at the border with Gaza before October!

h/t: Anna

12 thoughts on “The man who predicted the October 7 attack”

  1. I’m not surprised. Hamas doesn’t like it when things look good or calm as it means they may seem weak. Israel just plays them out until it happens again, and again, and again…..

    Pardon my cynicism.

    1. “Had his original plan succeeded, it would have been, by a wide margin, the worst attack in Israel’s history…”

      Stunning information. Thank you, Jim, for this note.

  2. Well, I think it’s a hindsight question. One has to consider that not only was the information mentioned in this piece being assessed, but so were countless other strands of info at the same time. In hindsight it’s easy to point to those that turned out to be correct and ask why they weren’t seen as the correct info. Beforehand, not so easy.

    1. I’d say better safe than sorry. And there was a confluence of information about Hamas attacks at that time. It would have been better to beef up the security arrangements at the southern border.

      1. Israel has always had these very difficult calls to make, weighing enemy intel and intent, as well as allies’ support/opposition. Two best examples might be Six-Day War and Yom Kippur War.

  3. Very interesting. And what would be the best action if this intel was not dismissed? It is still hard to know what best to do.
    1. Massively and visibly mobilize the Israeli military to cancel the nascent attack? Alerting both the public and they enemy? But the enemy response would be to chill things down until complacency sets in again.
    2. More quietly mobilize the military to allow the attack to begin? Kill the terrorists as they concentrate and cross the border, but also keeping it out of the public as much as possible? This would be great if it worked really really well, and would carve a big hole out of Hamas. But war is immediately unpredictable, and Israeli casualties would justifiably cause a lot of anger over not warning the public.
    3. Pre-emptively strike? But the results would not likely be as comprehensive, and that would still awaken anti-Semitism since much of the public just don’t get it. I think this is the least terrible of bad choices.

  4. Israel had a number of warnings of the attacks, both open (as Carmon notes) and military. As an example, the military observers watching the Gaza border repeatedly warned of preparations for invasion on the other side of the fence. Those and other warnings were ignored by their superiors and by the politicians.

    In addition, there were many warnings from militray, intelligence, and civilian observers that the concept was faulty. It relied on technology, which was superb. But technology can be overwhelmed—it only works if there are troops immediately available if an overwhelming attack occurs. And there were not enough troops immediately available. Nor would it have taken entire divisions to repel Hamas. We know the number and type of units that it would have taken to repel the attack. And in fact, one of those units had been transferred out of the area immediately prior to the attacks, possibly because of political pressure.

    All of this requires a National Investigation with subpoena powers. A mechanism for this exists in Israeli law, but Netanyahu continues to oppose it. The country (according to polls) and the security forces strongly favor establishment of such a commission.

  5. You are a pundit! (Or maybe pundit adjacent.) Interesting stuff. I frequent the MEMRI web site but had no idea that Malgorzata had done so much work for them. Well, Carmon’s prediction came true. October was a time of distraction for Israel, as the country was in the midst of the judicial reform crisis.

    1. I get a weekly email compendium from them. I have to brace myself to open it, as I always feel physically ill after reading it. The people who man it and contribute to it are unsung heroes imho. Very sturdy folk.

  6. Thanks for recommending The Free Press. It can be hit or miss, but I agree that on net, it’s worth it.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *