Nature Scientific Reports has an open-access article reporting a rare find: a mummy of a kitten (“juvenile”) of a sabre-toothed cat, found frozen in the Russian Republic of Sakha, in Siberia. You can read the report by clicking below, or download the pdf here.
Mummies are rare because an animal has to die and then be permanently frozen in ice, and then later discovered. This is, as far as I know, the first mummy of a sabre-toothed cat, though skeletal remains are known. (These skeletal remains were used to identify the species of cat; see below) It appears to be a young kitten, judging from comparison with a living relative, a three-week-old African lion (Panthera leo). The mummy’s remains were carbon dated to 31,808 ± 367 years ago, so it could have been contemporaneous with humans, who were probably in Siberia about that time.
Here’s a description of the specimen and then some photos:
The Badyarikha mummy (specimen DMF AS RS, no. Met-20-1) contains the head and the anterior part of the body preserved approximately to the caudal edge of the chest (Fig. 1). There are also incomplete pelvic bones articulated with the femur and shin bones. They were found encased in a piece of ice along with the front part of the cub corpse. The specimen is stored at DMF AS RS in Yakutsk.
Figure and caption from the paper (click figures to enlarge them):

And here’s a comparison of the heads of the specimen (top) with a preserved three-week old lion cub. The face of the sabre-tooth is flatter than that of the lion, but this is probably due to deformation of the specimen (see skulls below). But the mummified cats’ external ears (auricles) are not as prominent as those of the lion. (Smaller ears are a characteristic adaptation to cold climate, as protruding ears are a source of heat loss.) The mummy’s fur color was dark brown, with the paws and chin being lighter brown:
‘The authors make a big deal about the thickness of the neck, which shows that this was a muscular cat (compare with the lion cub below):

From the paper:
The mummy neck is longer and more than twice as thick as that of P. leo, ZMMU S-210286 (80.0 vs. 74.0, 52.0 vs. 32.0, respectively). The difference in thickness is explained by the large volume of muscles, which is visually observed at the site of separation of the skin from the mummified flesh.
Based on comparison of the skull with known fossil skeletons, they identified this cub tentatively as a juvenile Homotherium latidens.
Here’s an 8-minute movie about the genus Homotherium, showing a reconstruction of the animal and a lot of useful information:
And a photo of skulls of the sabre-tooth cub specimen (top row) and a 3-week old lion cub (bottom row). The enlarged arches, where chewing muscles are attached, suggest that the species was adapted to inflict a strong bite (perhaps to use its serrated incisor teeth), though I’m not a paleontologist and am just guessing.

The authors say this:
One of the striking features of the morphology of Homotherium, both in adults and in the studied cub, is the presence of an enlarged premaxillary bone, containing a lateromedially expanded row of large cone-shaped incisors that form a convex arch. Among all the unerupted teeth of the Homotherium cub mummy, only the upper and lower deciduous incisors protrude with their tops from the alveoli.
Here’s where the premaxillary bone is: the orange one in front. You can see that this bone is larger in the mummy than in the lion cub.
Finally, the configuration of the paws, which are far more rounded in the mummy than in a lion cub, support the suggestions from the cub’s ears that this was a cat adapted to the cold. Forepaw photos, with A-C being the mummy and D being a lion cub. Rounded paws, also seen in lynxes and other cold-weather cats, are better for walking on snow, as they act as “snowshoes” that give a greater area of contact with the snow:

And the authors’ interpretation:
The front paw of the juvenile Homotherium latidens has a rounded shape. Its width is almost equal to its length, in contrast to lion cubs with their elongated and relatively narrow front paw (Fig. 7). The wide paw, the subsquare shape of its pads, and the absence of a carpal pad are adaptations to walking in snow and low temperatures. The small, low auricles and absence of the carpal pad in Badyarikha Homotherium contrast with the taller auricles and normally developed pads in the lion cub. All these features can be interpreted as adaptations to living in cold climate.
The carpal pad (“2” in the lion photo) is apparently missing in the sabre-tooth, and this is said to be an adaptation to walking in snow, though I’m not sure why. But all the data indicate that this species of cat was muscular (the forepaws also suggest more muscles than the lion) and, as suggested from its Siberian habitat, adapted to a cold climate. You can learn more about the lifestyle of this genus of cat from the movie above.
h/t: Erik


Wowwww… I’m astonished by the condition of the specimen – what a tiny, but crystal clear insight into a world from long ago.
Those sabre-tooths are beauties – powerfully built, and what a set of teeth. They roamed around here (greater Cincinnati) a few years before I did.
Indeed. I still have vivid memories from decades ago of the mounted skeletons at the La Brea tar pits museum. IMO anyone visiting LA should take the time to go see it — 5 stars. Try to imagine your ancestors sharing their habitat….
The discovery of a lifetime! Such a beautiful kitty.
Thank you for this post. The video is so informative.
I’m just fascinated by the build of this cat. So well equipped to kill its prey. What a jaw and teeth. So different from a snow leopard with a long tail for balance in the mountains. No need for these cats. All the power is in the front end there it seems.
And there are toe beans!
I expect some of the buzz surrounding this discovery are questions about whether we could clone it. But I think that like practical nuclear fusion technology, being able to clone long extinct organisms will always be some decades into the future.
I’ve read that Smilodons are only distantly related to modern cats (Wikipedia says the lines diverged about 20 million years ago.)
I wonder if clones can be generated from species that distantly related?
There must be some sort of mix up here. That’s not a cat skull. I don’t even think that it’s a mammal skull.
What do you think it is, then? You seem so sure, you could at least tell us why you think these scientists missidentified it.
I suppose he means the picture that shows parts of a skull in colour. Not supposed to be a cat skull, just a generic skull…!
Okay, I suppose so. Odd that they picked something that looked so reptilian.
Alligator maybe? I mean, a cat’s skull is most certainly not elongated like that, and no mammal has teeth like that (except maybe the cetaceans).
Very interesting -note in English a scimitar-toothed cat rather than sabre-toothed…
… but that is a trivial point!