As I made a visit to Facebook last night, and saw that about 40% of the posts were about Donald Trump, all saying basically the same thing—the man is an idiot—I began to experience the phenomenon of Trumpfenschmerz, or “Trump Weariness.” I wanted to write on my page, “Can we talk about cats instead?”, but I knew I’d be excoriated for it. I refrained. But now there’s one more thing to say about Trump—to call your attention to a new article about him in The New Yorker.
As much as I disliked and distrusted Trump before I read the piece, and figured that it couldn’t get worse, it has. The article, now called “Donald Trump’s Ghostwriter Tells All” (in print it was called “Donald Trump’s Boswell”), discusses the revelations of Tony Schwartz, the guy who ghostwrote Trump’s book The Art of the Deal. And he’s repudiated Trump, describing him as a completely self-absorbed man with not a jot of empathy for anyone, no deep knowledge of anything, and no attention span. Trump would, says Schwartz, be a horrible President—even worse than we envisioned given Trump’s minuscule attention span.
Schwartz feels so bad about having written this book (his description of how he wrote it is fascinating) that he’s donated all the profits, which are considerable, to charities Trump wouldn’t like—such as those helping migrant workers.
You owe it to yourself to read this piece, though I suspect 99% of the readers here already despise Trump. I wonder what Republicans who read it will think—if any Republicans do read the New Yorker.
Follow-up:
Donald Trump Threatens the Ghostwriter of “The Art of the Deal”
Schwartz:
Trump responded:
It’s possible that Trump thought Schwartz was saying “axe maniac.” Nevertheless, there appears to be some evidence for this claim too.
http://media.salon.com/2015/09/trump_shining.jpg
Trump is certainly a dull (witted) boy.
“Trumpfenschmerz”!
Love it!
‘Drumpfenschmerz’ also has a nice ring to it.
Schwartz aptly describes Trump as a sociopath.
You might also want to read Could Donald Trump Pass A Sanity Test?
Should we not be hearing this 6 months ago?
I believe it’s “Drumpfenschmerz.” 🙂
Great episode.
Yes, I loved it too–a masterful example of mocking with a point. I wish I knew how to do it, having never learned how to be funny or bring relief with insightful ridicule.
But Oliver nailed it with Drumpf. I wish that name stuck longer than the week or so after the show aired.
Too bad there isn’t an “evil” programmer out there to hack the net and change every extant instance of Tr*mp to Drumpf.
We can all contribute by using his ancestral name whenever possible.
Yeah, I read Mayer’s piece. It’s fanTAStic.
I concur (read it a couple days ago? perhaps yesterday… am in a time warp).
More off-the-cuff sociopathy from the douche: https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/21/the-certain-trumpet-donald-trump-new-york-times-interview-baltics-russia-nato/
That article is pretty Orwellian
It’s gonna be unbelievable, so unbelievable, it’s really gonna be unbelievable.
Could we just see some more wildlife photos, instead?
Seriously, though- the only reason Trump’s gotten as far as he has is that he’s tapped successfully into the unbelievably deep wellspring of anger and ignorance that is unfortunately all too prevalent in this arrogant, self-centered country today. I theorize that, had he not existed, another Trump “clone” would have been manufactured by circumstances to play his role.
And yet, there was a piece on NPR this a.m. with interviews from blue collar people, life long Democrats, in Pennsylvania, pledging to vote for Trump because “he gives us hope.” When asked if his “hopeful” messages have any substance (as in “I’ll put you all back to work”), they said they didn’t care if he could deliver. They just wanted to feel “hopeful.” Speaking of SCARY.
Oooo, this ___ resonates !
Writing as one who, over scores’ worth of time, knows: H O P E ? Hope is a Woman – Killer. Chapter Nine of http://bluemaas.public.iastate.edu .
Frickin’ frightening.
Blue
JC, it wouldn’t matter one iota if his supporters read the Article. As Trump himself said, if he took out a gun in Times Square and began shooting, he wouldn’t lose one vote. In addition, many of his supporters have such a deep abiding hatred for all things Hillary, that they would vote for another Hitler, before voting for Clinton.
No, I didn’t read the article because I don’t have to read this article or any articles or anything at all because I go with my gut, meaning I have keen instincts which make me much better than a lot of experts and hey — look out the window, it’s a bird! Reminds me of how important I am.
(Yes, I read the article. I never said I didn’t.)
+1
spot on!
It’s the parenthesis at the end that makes the post so perfect. +2
Oy.
The disconnect between Republicans and The New Yorker goes both ways — as exemplified most poignantly by the late New Yorker film critic Pauline Kael’s (possibly apocryphal) comment that she couldn’t believe Richard Nixon had been elected president since “nobody I know voted for him.”
After reading “Donald Trump’s Boswell,” my feelings about Trump’s ghostwriter, Tony Schwarz, are nearly as ambivalent as his are about Trump.
The best magazine profile of Trump that I’ve read is this one by McKay Coppins, written when Trump was gearing up for his presidential run.
The link to the Coppins piece above is behind a paywall. It can be accessed for free here: https://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppins/36-hours-on-the-fake-campaign-trail-with-donald-trump?utm_term=.jkBmJOQdv#.aiY5G6wN0
That Kael anecdote has been debunked:
http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2012/10/The-Fraudulent-Factoid-That-Refuses-to-Die
The real quote comes from a speech Kael delivered at the Modern Language Association:
“I live in a rather special world. I only know one person who voted for Nixon. Where they are I don’t know. They’re outside my ken. But sometimes when I’m in a theater I can feel them.”
As the article says, “Rather than showing out-of-touch insularity on Kael’s part, the quote actually shows Kael is perfectly aware of that insularity and is in fact making light of it.”
In somewhat related news, a survey has shown that readers of Harry Potter are overwhelmingly likely to be very anti-Trump, but the correlation is much lower for folks having only seen the movies.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/celebrity/harry-potter-readers-more-likely-to-dislike-donald-trump-says-study/ar-BBuCfvk?li=AA2qN5v&ocid=spartandhp
You have a hypothesis regarding the causation of this correlation? Muggles are indisposed to orange death eaters, maybe?
I’d aver that you could eliminate “of Harry Potter” and the sentence will still work.
I think the key word is “read”
😉
cr
– which of course is exactly what Musical Beef implied. Sorry for the superfluity.
cr
I will read the article. Which article can anyone suggest reading if someone despises Hillary, and believes she would also make a terrible president?
Have you read the book “Crisis of Character:A White House Secret Service Officer Discloses His Firsthand Experience With Hillary, Bill and How They Operate” by Gary J. Byrne?
I’m developing a theory – which is mine (there’s another one for someone’s “phrases I hate” list ; no great fan of it myself) :
Trump is a robot, developed in the late 1980s by the Rump of the Reagan executive, with the explicit aim of improving Reagan’s reputation by plumbing new depths.
Or maybe it’s Shrub’s team, working more recently, and the Real Trump is in a Matrix-like living battery. Or sleeping with Jimmy Hoffa’s fishes.
That would explain his absence from the Cleveland convention.
The idea that US presidents, beginning with Reagan’s second term, are digital constructs, has been developed in “Generation P”, a novel by Russian writer Victor Pelevin:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_%22%D0%9F%22
To PROGRAMME something(s) like that(those) … [disgust reaction]
Tony Schwartz sound like the guy who has taken many showers, attempting to get the dirty feeling off but, unlike Trump, has a conscience and that is the rub.
For most of us who have seen only a little of this character in action, nothing in the article surprises. How he continues to sucker the majority of the party is hard to understand, but just might be due to the low intelligence we perceive. Somehow, the people within this republican party are simply not capable of seeing how stupid their ideas have become. Just go back for a moment and look, but not closely, at all the candidates they started out with. Many of them were just plain nut jobs but the one still standing is a true psychopath.
Reblogged this on The Logical Place.
‘I wonder what Republicans who read it will think—if any Republicans do read the New Yorker’.
I wonder if any Republicans think.
The article was fantastic, and I say that with the same weariness about Trump (thanks, in part, to the relentless circle jerk that is the bubble of social media I reside in.) Of course, being an Australian and having no moderate US friends who might be swayed by such an article means that me reading it is purely for my pleasure – if pleasure is the right word…
I am glad to hear that I am not the only one suffering from Trump derangement. The big money boys will soon begin to back Trump. All we can do is donate to Clinton as upsetting as that makes some people.
.
You can remind people in your circle that Hillary does not hate anyone, and does not want to put up walls. She wants to take walls down that are barriers.
That is doing something that does not require donating.
Goddamn I hate that man. I hope a lot of people end up reading this.
It’s not good.
His opponent charges more for an hour speech than most Americans make in a year — and there must be a reason why organizations are willing to pay. No one gives away that money.
Both her and Bill have provided government access to people who”donate” to their ” charity”.
Someone who the FBI director said ” didn’t understand email and handling of secrets”
And a person promising to constitutionally undermine the first amendment.
Was it George Will be recommended picking a name from the phone book?
Organizations like Goldman Sachs routinely pay that much in speaking fees. Folks who command six-figure speaking fees include famous actors and singers, CEOs, and other politicians. If you look at the current line up of speakers for Goldman Sachs, it includes people like Lauren Bush, Tom Brokaw, Cardinal Timothy Dolan, and everybody’s favorite gadfly, Deepak Chopra. I suspect most of those people are commanding more in speaker fees than most Americans make in a year.
I am left oriented but departed company from the Left years ago over Islam. As an Australian I cant vote but would vote Trump if I could because he is a much more honest and genuine person than sociopaths Obama and Clinton. Leftists thes days are just closet nazis. They hate Israel, Any religion not Islam, and now Trump. Leftists, your hypocrisy makes me sick.
Where do you get this idea that Trump is honest and genuine?
For instance, Politifact has Trump rated at 75% of his statements are “mostly false” or worse. By comparison, only 27% of Hillary’s merit the same ratings, 26% of Obama’s.
You remind me of the guy who would burn his house down because the floor in the hallway needs a cleaning. Like the one trick pony who bombed when his trick failed. The leftists have let you down so you are ready for Trump? And you are happy to call them nazis yet think you know who the sociopaths are. Yes, if you were in America, republican would be for you.
The only time Donald Trump settled for second-best was when he heard that honesty was the best policy.
Others have already addressed the issue of Trump’s honesty – he’s not honest or genuine – but I have to ask how you can see Obama as a sociopath but not Trump. Trump does not care in the slightest about tenants in his buildings, students at his (gag) “university”, or business partners who lost considerable sums as a result of his lying all the way through the process of making the deal. As long as he gets his cut it’s all good.
In Drumpf’s mind, It’s not whether you win or lose; what matters is that Drumpf wins and everybody else loses.
I understand your opinion and share it to some degree. Nevertheless, I think that you have to moderate your qualifications if you wish to discuss with your opponents. Or maybe you have lost hope? I understand this also. Recently, I stopped commenting on a leftist blog (not this one) and almost stopped reading it, after the author and some commenters blamed the Orlando shooting on the alleged US hate culture and specifically on Trump.
Here, you need a good dose of Sam Harris:
Der Drumpfenlegion pays no mind to ‘The New Yorker’, and I doubt it would matter if they did. Last night’s Stephen Colbert bit where he goes to Cleveland and interviews convention-goers shows (at least anecdotally) they are spectacularly uninformed about Trump. He’s less a candidate than a refuge where hatred of Hillary, Obama, and Democrats can run riot.
Precisely. What’s worse is that most right-wingers don’t seem to want a candidate. All they want is a lightning rod onto which they can discharge their crippling levels of xenophobia.
Ezra Klein’s searing indictment of Trump at the Vox site makes a perfect supplement to the Mayer article.
http://www.vox.com/2016/7/21/12218136/donald-trump-nomination-afraid
He is a supremely dangerous Nazi/Fascist Reich-Wing, Racist, Xenophobic, Sexist, idiot and to be totally frank I am terrified. The thought of living in the Forth Reich of America with neo-Nazi Skin-Heads, Aryan-Nation psychopath’s, Meth-Head Bikers, and psychotic Gun-crazies patrolling the streets is horrifying. Please, Please win Hillary, save us from this monster.
Pretty much agrees with what we already know. Trump is a member of the rentier class who has spotted a gap in the market to become a demagogue.
“He preached the words of wisdom.
With his hands and with his mouth.
Then everyone believed him.
And then he believed himself”
The Ballad of J.J.Decay, Anti-Nowhere League
This article is a must-read.
Who doesn’t despise Trump, aside from Trump supporters (aka The Bigots of America)? What’s more interesting–trust me I have no bias–is who’s to blame for His Rise: https://jonestownbreakdown.wordpress.com/2016/07/28/orwell-strikes-again/