Immiscible

19 thoughts on “Immiscible”

1. Very well done!

2. Excellent!

3. Nice work!

   That religion is dense surprises no one really. What were they thinking?

   1. Nice shot!

4. “Hir,” huh? Huzzah!

   Zhe did a nice job on the cartoon, too.

5. Ha! No solution to that problem.

6. Nice one. Not even a catalyst could increase the chances of a colloid here.

   1. Catalyst? A catalyst can only increase the rate It can’t stabilise a product which is unstable on its own.

      An emulsifier is another story.

7. This of course parallels the history of science, where it was once blended into theism, and then gradually it was not.

8. More soap needed

9. OMA to NOMA in 3 steps.

10. Not sure I understand it, but glad to see you are subscribing to WEIT. I know all about the dreaded Templeton prize!

11. Lucky they don’t *explode*. Carbon + FOOF, maybe?

    (Don’t try THIS at home, kids! :))

12. Ah, but there’s some sort of…spirit snaking up the right side, there!

13. I wish the cartoonist had used “religion” instead of “ideology”.

    Every philosophy student is going on and on about how science is also an ideology.

    1. But it’s not, so we can ignore them. 🙂

       1. True, and word wise it is an archaic definition, but the religious and the ‘philosopher’ endlessly nitpick. They focus on the wrong thing.. which is tremendously irritating to people like us.

          1. Well, as long as it keeps them occupied…

             (I wonder if those philosophy students take many science courses?)

             1. And [obviously] you have nailed it. To each their own, but I wish we could get them mildly interested in the scientific method and knowledge. I keep trying.
                How for example, could you not be excited about the LIGO breakthrough??

Comments are closed.