Galápagos bound

Being too cheap to travel to the Galápagos on my own, I’ve wished for years for an invitation to go there as an “expert.” That’s about to come true, as I embark Thursday for a ten-day trip to the islands, courtesy of The Aspen Institute and the folks at Lindblad.  This is a “Darwin Year” voyage, complete with readings, discussions, and panels on evolution. (The other “experts” are Olivia Judson and Mark Plotkin). I’ll try to do some postings from the islands, though internet access is limited.

Over the last few weeks I’ve been rereading Darwin and others (especially Frank Sulloway) on the islands and their effect on Darwin’s formulation of 1859.  What is most striking from these readings is that the islands did not, as is often assumed, constitute a “eureka moment” for Darwin: he did not hit upon, nor even begin to formulate, his theory of “transmutation” until several years thereafter.

True, the Galápagos did constitute important evidence for the biogeographic chapters of The Origin, but this came as much from the plants (and Joseph Hooker’s analysis of them) as from the finches.  Indeed, “Darwin’s finches” are not even mentioned in The Origin!  This may be because Darwin botched his collections there, failing to put the island source on the collecting labels.  He was forced to reconstruct the biogeography of the finches (which at first he didn’t recognize as a group of close relatives) using specimens collected — and properly labelled — by Darwin’s manservant and by Captain Fitzroy himself.  Darwin’s failure to mention finches in The Origin may reflect his continuing uncertainty about the nature of the evidence.   He knew by 1859 that the 14 species were indeed closely related (ornithologist John Gould had determined that for him), but the uncertainty about their biogeography led to confusion about what role geographic isolation played in the origin of species.

Darwin’s plant collections, on the other hand, were properly labeled, for pressing plants on the spot is more conducive to accurate recording of localities.  And it was Joseph Hooker’s identification of the plants, their affinity, and especially the uniqueness of many species to specific islands, that helped convince Darwin he was on the right track.

Here, from Chapter 12, is the most famous mention of the Galápagos in The Origin.  Notice Darwin’s clever use of rhetorical questions to attack creationism.  How could a Victorian reader fail to be convinced by arguments like this?

The most striking and important fact for us in regard to the inhabitants of islands, is their affinity to those of the nearest mainland, without being actually the same species. Numerous instances could be given of this fact. I will give only one, that of the Galapagos Archipelago, situated under the equator, between 500 and 600 miles from the shores of South America. Here almost every product of the land and water bears the unmistakeable stamp of the American continent. There are twenty-six land birds, and twenty-five of those are ranked by Mr Gould as distinct species, supposed to have been created here; yet the close affinity of most of these birds to American species in every character, in their habits, gestures, and tones of voice, was manifest. So it is with the other animals, and with nearly all the plants, as shown by Dr. Hooker in his admirable memoir on the Flora of this archipelago. The naturalist, looking at the inhabitants of these volcanic islands in the Pacific, distant several hundred miles from the continent, yet feels that he is standing on American land. Why should this be so? why should the species which are supposed to have been created in the Galapagos Archipelago, and nowhere else, bear so plain a stamp of affinity to those created in America? There is nothing in the conditions of life, in the geological nature of the islands, in their height or climate, or in the proportions in which the several classes are associated together, which resembles closely the conditions of the South American coast: in fact there is a considerable dissimilarity in all these respects. On the other hand, there is a considerable degree of resemblance in the volcanic nature of the soil, in climate, height, and size of the islands, between the Galapagos and Cape de Verde Archipelagos: but what an entire and absolute difference in their inhabitants! The inhabitants of the Cape de Verde Islands are related to those of Africa, like those of the Galapagos to America. I believe this grand fact can receive no sort of explanation on the ordinary view of independent creation; whereas on the view here maintained, it is obvious that the Galapagos Islands would be likely to receive colonists, whether by occasional means of transport or by formerly continuous land, from America; and the Cape de Verde Islands from Africa; and that such colonists would be liable to modifications; the principle of inheritance still betraying their original birthplace.

16 Comments

  1. scotth
    Posted January 4, 2010 at 7:57 am | Permalink

    I made this trip with the JREF in August 2008. You are in for something you will never forget.

    Be sure to bring a laptop or portable HD to offload your digital media, you will take more photos and video than you can imagine. There is as much to see underwater as above, be prepared to record images while snorkeling if possible. Also, the geology is as fascinating as what’s living. A brief study of the geology before you leave might add to your enjoyment.

    Have a great time. As high as my expectations were before I arrived, they were completely demolished by the reality. This really one of “those” kinds of trips. I hope to return in January someday to see the very different behavior of the iguanas during breeding season.

  2. Posted January 4, 2010 at 8:11 am | Permalink

    Greetings,

    Enjoy the islands! I have been lucky enough to have gone five times as an instructor for a University course there.

    You WILL acquire more photos than you can believe!

    It is a life-changing experience. Enjoy the wonders of the evolving world!

  3. John D Stackpole
    Posted January 4, 2010 at 8:22 am | Permalink

    Are there Kittehs on the Gal-Islands?

    Be sure to post pictures of them.

  4. Posted January 4, 2010 at 8:23 am | Permalink

    So cool about trip. Have incredible time, which you obviously will.

    Interesting that young Charles bungled the labeling. Oops!

  5. Posted January 4, 2010 at 8:30 am | Permalink

    Tenure has its privileges.

    Don’t forget to pack some copies of PDL(TM) by Rick Warren to feed the Iguanas.

  6. ennui
    Posted January 4, 2010 at 8:33 am | Permalink

    The blue feet of the boobies matches well the green of our envy. Enjoy!

  7. Notagod
    Posted January 4, 2010 at 9:01 am | Permalink

    Oh the joy! Maybe, I will see you there, as I am awaiting an invitation to go there as an idiot to arrive.

    Very happy for you Dr. Coyne, enjoy!

  8. Posted January 4, 2010 at 9:14 am | Permalink

    This is a great opportunity. You’ll have a great time.

    Congratulations!

  9. KP
    Posted January 4, 2010 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    Didn’t Wells try to capitalize on Darwin’s “late” analysis of finches in Icons of Evolution?

  10. Sven DiMilo
    Posted January 4, 2010 at 1:26 pm | Permalink

    Yes, there are cats on the islands. Unfortunately.

  11. SeanK
    Posted January 4, 2010 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    This is a trip I’d like to take some day. I look forward to reading about your voyage and seeing some of the pictures you take.

  12. Sili
    Posted January 4, 2010 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    I really need to read Darwin at some point. I’m pretty sure I have a copy of the Origin, but Chuck know where it might be.

  13. Posted January 5, 2010 at 6:12 am | Permalink

    The Galapagos Islands are the most incredible living museum of evolutionary changes, with a huge variety of exotic species (birds, land and sea animals, plants) and landscapes not seen anywhere else.

  14. Posted January 5, 2010 at 9:13 am | Permalink

    Keep your underwater camera around your wrist, not in your bathing suit. I made that mistake and mine drifted away. A sea lion took it. After he decided it was inedible and wasn’t going to play with him, he let it go and I was able to retrieve it.

    Don’t take binoculars. It sounds crazy, but you won’t need them. If you want to see the animal, stand beside it.

  15. scotth
    Posted January 5, 2010 at 9:17 am | Permalink

    To be fair, I did use my binocs…. To look at the Southern sky. Philip is right, though… getting close to the animal is NO problem.

    • John D Stackpole
      Posted January 5, 2010 at 9:25 am | Permalink

      Even those Finches?


%d bloggers like this: